--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
He's not talking about adding plugins to the allow list, but adding
variables/commands to the allow list. Example being the "play" command,
which can be executed on clients regardles of "cl_restrict_server_commands"
value.
On 5/4/07, Whisper <[EM
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
It was bloody ManiMod that was the main cause of the issue in the first
place /sigh
On 5/4/07, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> Hope ManiMod, SourceMM, SourceMod, and Eventscripts all g
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Hope ManiMod, SourceMM, SourceMod, and Eventscripts all go on that allowed
list right off the bat.
On 4/27/07, Alfred Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you write a plugin that runs client commands and you believe you have
> a command tha
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
try 36!
--
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
. Mai 2007 03:34
An: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Betreff: RE: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
(cl_restrict_server_commands)
I agree with LDuke on this.
All these new features and lock-down type changes are all good, however the
biggest threat that I see at the moment, is
ards,
Adam.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LDuke
Sent: Wednesday, 2 May 2007 11:53 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
(cl_restrict_server_commands)
--
[ Picked text/plain from
Bind s kill
LDuke wrote:
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I can think of only 2 major plugin functions affected by this.
One is server forwarding. I've heard from people operating 50 servers that
all forward to one, and I've joined many of these types of servers, so I'm
not u
LDuke wrote:
> I can't think of another valid reason to use a client exec from a plugin. I
> don't understand why there is so much outcry. What client commands (other
> than those listed above) are you execing on players that you miss so much
> with the restrictions?
>
> Grant
> (L. Duke)
The abil
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
The alias command, however there's no chance on valve unlocking that
due to it's potentially unsafe nature. This is why it was ideal to have the
end user be able to choose.
There's a huge difference between enforcing a certain cvar and policing
e
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I can think of only 2 major plugin functions affected by this.
One is server forwarding. I've heard from people operating 50 servers that
all forward to one, and I've joined many of these types of servers, so I'm
not unhappy about this change at
First of all it is the users responsibility to protect themselves from such
attacks seeing as they can come from anywhere. The MOTD can point to a
malicious website... what does that have to do with client exec?
Secondly this is a pattern by Valve. They add these great "features" that
break mods a
The question is, are you willing to take responsibility for security
breaches on client machines as a result of executable code you have sent
those machines via the Source network system?
The simplest example would be to point the internal browser at a site
which contains IE exploits, there are m
t;> Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server
>> beta (cl_restrict_server_commands)
>>
>> Yes, I commend Valve for getting betas out now instead of having
>> things come out broken. I've already tried to help by letting
>> Alfred know about som
ied to help by letting Alfred know about
> some
> issues with the new release. I'm just curious as to what the missing
> cl_restrict... is about.
>
> Dan
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NaughtyGeek
> Sen
I agree:-)
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NaughtyGeek
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 10:24 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
(cl_restrict_server_commands)
I
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NaughtyGeek
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 11:24 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
(cl_restrict_server_commands)
I'm really going to have to disagree with
s] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
(cl_restrict_server_commands)
The betas are awesome...nobody is disagreeing with that. The point is
that a fairly major feature has been changed...and it wasnt even in the
changelog. And then when asked about it, it was like an afterthought
"Oh
d, zBlock
needs to be updated."
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NaughtyGeek
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 11:24 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
(cl_restrict_serve
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NaughtyGeek
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 11:24 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
(cl_restrict_server_commands)
I'm really going to have to disagree with you on this
s] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
(cl_restrict_server_commands)
I'm really going to have to disagree with you on this one. We all jumped
up and down and said we needed betas before releases and here we are
with a beta to test. Change is a necessary evil and most of the people
he
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NaughtyGeek
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 11:24 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
(cl_restrict_server_commands)
I'm really going to have to disagree with you on t
@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
(cl_restrict_server_commands)
I'm really going to have to disagree with you on this one. We all jumped up
and down and said we needed betas before releases and here we are with a
beta to test. Change
Keeper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:56 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
(cl_restrict_server_commands)
Plugin makers work hard to make plugins that help server operators as well
as bring some new fun into th
I'm really going to have to disagree with you on this one. We all jumped up and
down and said we needed betas before releases and here we are with a beta to
test. Change is a necessary evil and most of the people here seem to have made
assumptions with the information that was provided. The cl_r
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 10:23 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
(cl_restrict_server_commands)
Amen. What is going on here? It seems
> > broken... I really don't see how you can remove a perfectly
>> >> functional
>> >> > and
>> >> > > save
>> >> > > feature out of the blue.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On 4/26/07, Affordable
; > broken... I really don't see how you can remove a perfectly
> >> functional
> >> > and
> >> > > save
> >> > > feature out of the blue.
> >> > >
> >> > > On 4/26/07, Affordablegameservers.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gt; > able
> > > to run commands on clients (ie plugins will work now without
the cvar
> > set
> > > to
> > > 0)
> > > thanks
> > > dex
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
plugins will work now without the cvar
> > set
> > > to
> > > 0)
> > > thanks
> > > dex
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alfred Reynold
; now its always on) or that its been removed period so now servers are
> > able
> > > to run commands on clients (ie plugins will work now without the cvar
> > set
> > > to
> > > 0)
> > > thanks
> > > dex
> > >
> > >
t
> > to
> > 0)
> > thanks
> > dex
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alfred Reynolds
> > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 5:28 PM
> > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
>
Reading what he said:
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 2:12 PM
> To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
> Subject: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
> (cl_restrict_server_commands)
>
> The cl_restrict_server_commands cvar is not found in the beta version I
; dex
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alfred Reynolds
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 5:28 PM
> To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
> Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
> (cl_restric
D]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alfred Reynolds
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 5:28 PM
> To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
> Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
> (cl_restrict_server_commands)
>
>
> The restrict cvar has been remo
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alfred Reynolds
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 5:28 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
(cl_restrict_server_commands)
The restrict cvar has been removed, zBlock needs to be updated.
- Alfred
PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Alfred Reynolds
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. April 2007 23:28
> An: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
> Betreff: RE: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
> (cl_restrict_server_commands)
>
> The restrict cvar has been removed, zBlock needs to
.com
> Subject: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
> (cl_restrict_server_commands)
>
> The cl_restrict_server_commands cvar is not found in the beta version I
> get kicked from zBlock enabled servers for not having
: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine Dedicated server beta
(cl_restrict_server_commands)
The cl_restrict_server_commands cvar is not found in the beta version I get
kicked from zBlock enabled servers for not having it set to 0. Also server
plug ins can exec
The restrict cvar has been removed, zBlock needs to be updated.
- Alfred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MaydaX
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 2:12 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: [hlds] RE: [hlds_linux] Source Engine
The cl_restrict_server_commands cvar is not found in the beta version I
get kicked from zBlock enabled servers for not having it set to 0. Also
server plug ins can exec client commands.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list a
40 matches
Mail list logo