phat base
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 11:13:19AM -0700, Nick Shaffner wrote:
VAC updated yesterday, more of the same:
* New detections.
* New detection technology.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 12:01:33AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any chance we can get statistics on how many people are being banned
for cheating. The best would be like the Steam statistics, a nice graph with
new VAC releases marked.
While theres mention of statistics, what about
What I mean is simple, I can do whatever I want with my server.
According to the laws and our constituition, everyone has granted to
right to speak freely as long as someone wants to ear it. Extreme right
groups are forbiden by law, but single persons are free to adopt that
ideology, except
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 06:21:20PM +0300, Mihai Badila wrote:
a small feature, let us choose the radar background color. i personally
prefer black, much more contrast. i'm sure it's wanted by many.
thanks,
mike
Yup, I'd LOVE it, black with white dots please.
Cheers,
James.
On Mon, May
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 10:21:31PM +0100, Jess Kitchen wrote:
On Tue, 4 May 2004, Kenny @ Emsco wrote:
Yeah that's happened since I can remember with HL. I think it's a feature
not a BUG.
One that was inherited from Quake iirc. (whatever happened to nine inch
nails anyhow?)
Trent
Note to self.
Don't add:
exec server.cfg
to your server.cfg, gets itself into a nasty loop.
You'll want:
mapchangecfgfile server.cfg
(I've given myself the dumb award.)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
Being the gamesmaster for the ISP I work at, I'm getting a few people
asking me about CZ, since I've bought it already they haven't yet.
Most want to know what to expect, i.e. is there going to be more anticheat
stuff, more or less resource hogging etc... I don't know the answers,
wondering if
stuff, I'll start clean off the CZ CD's then
purchase it with my CD-key... I hope this makes sense when I go to do it
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
James Clark
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 11:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
an empty server
cpu% mem%
24.7 48.4
metamod + amxmod, cs is unplayable without _real_ player management utilities
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 04:40:25PM +, wouter v/d Bergh wrote:
http://www.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=65878goto=newpost
with...
Matt Judge wrote:
They have added nothing to this game since they bought it.
The fact that they decided to control cheating shows how little they
have contributed.
They haven't got a fscking clue.
Matt.
dual_bereta_r0x wrote:
James Clark wrote:
an empty server
cpu% mem%
24.7
all those extra CPU cycles gone? I can't really think of any great
improvements.
It ramped up horribly with voice chat, security modules and in game
hltv-like-stuff-when-dead-guff.
/rant
-Original Message-
From: James Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 March 2004 12:25 AM
represents a large
enough percentage of players to spend time and money on, especially on
such an aging game. Use Winex or something.
Like I said, marketshare guff.
You must have an MSCE =D
-Original Message-
From: James Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 March 2004 02:16 AM
.
Nothing I can do about it. :(
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 18:38, James Clark wrote:
The number of people on this list that have their IP listed in some sort
of black-list is depressing, here are a couple of examples from the last
two hours or so. Enjoy.
James.
From: LuZiFeR [EMAIL
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 08:30:51AM -0600, Mike Kercher wrote:
He looked at his SpamAssassin report and thought he'd throw it out there.
Yup.
For the most part, it was all gibberish.
How?
*MOST* people have an ISP that
issues them a dynamic IP address, which is subject to change at any
spam has
totally destroyed any reliable communication across the Internet without
using a IM client :(
Exactly. If you want reliable communication, use a phone :)
SMTP is fucked - the protocol relies on trust and things being done
correctly - of which humans are terrible at both, thats why
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 08:24:37AM +0100, Jens Bergmann wrote:
Hi James,
4. Run your new steam to get the update.
./steam -command update -game cstrike -dir /path/to/steam/ -username
leethaxor -email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -password password -verify_all
5. Fix liblist.gam...
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von James
Clark
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. M?rz 2004 22:38
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [hlds_linux] [OT] Black Lists
The number of people on this list that have their IP listed in some sort
of black-list is depressing, here
I had some funkiness when updating my server and managed to sort it be
following these simple steps.
1. Run your steam update the old fashioned way. This will update your
steam client.
./steam -update cstrike /path/to/steam/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] password
2. Remove the blob, the blob is bad.
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:34:30PM -0400, Tyler [TASF]Overkill Schwend wrote:
Yes.
Bwahahaha! biten in the ass by MS.
Windows is shit.
--
James.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Clark
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 7:25 PM
Stormtrooper wrote:
The main problem I have with making a 1.9.2 release is not knowing the
format of the STEAM ID. I can't find any explaination as to what X
is in STEAM_0:X:123456
If I knew what X stood for I could more easily make an offical patch to
support the STEAM ID's.
Can someone from
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 08:26:14PM -0400, Daniel Stroven wrote:
That was beta, not final release.
Maybe you missed my point?
The beta worked, and it worked very very well, flawlessly you might say.
The final version is shit.
Final versions are supposed to be BETTER than beta version.
--
James
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:28:12PM -0400, Daniel Stroven wrote:
amx_invis
http://amxmod.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=9100highlight=amxinvis
works great in my opinion but I try to keep it low key.
Does it work on 1.6? A few of the amx plugins I had working mint in
1.5 don't work as they did in
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 09:24:04PM -0400, Tyler Overkill Schwend wrote:
Oh come on, I see updates for my Linux boxes just as often as the
Windows boxes...
but how often to those updates require a restart?
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:23:24AM +1200, Simon Garner wrote:
For those that hadn't heard... looks like HL2 won't make September 30 :(
www.planethalflife.com
-Simon
Anyone that thought it would was stupid.
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:55:01AM +1200, Simon Garner wrote:
On Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:33 AM [GMT+1200=NZT],
James Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone that thought it would was stupid.
Well, Valve were pretty adamant it would.
In any case, I don't mind if they delay it a bit
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:49:26PM -0500, Michael Ressen wrote:
It's getting late in the day. What's goin on?
Eric?
Michael Ressen,
Michigan Burbs Network Administrator
Fuck sake, shut up.
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:39:11PM -0700, Mad Scientist wrote:
According to the great words of James Clark:
My 1.5 server was x.1.1.0 and it has been patched (build date is nice
and new).
But it is now a x.1.1.1 server.
Great... I just patched and went up to x.1.1.1 and... segmentation
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 01:49:28PM +1200, Jeremy Brooking wrote:
James Clark wrote:
You should have been running at least 1.15 metamod - it has been out
for months. Infact 1.16 has been out for months - although I still use
1.15 - as I saw nothing in the changelog that affected CS
./steam -update cstrike
Checking bootstrapper version ...
Updating Installation
[Source file BSLTime.h, line 53] CUnpackedTime out of range (year 2003, month 6, day
31, hour 3, minute 50, second 50, millisecond 714, microsecond 0)
___
To unsubscribe,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:09:13AM +1000, Adam Smith wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Frank Stollar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Simon Garner wrote:
But it affects other cards as well. And it doesn't affect all OpenGL
games?
It's a Win2k and WinXP issue,
oh wait, somewhere in here:
http://www.majorgeeks.com/
Better yet:
http://www.sheep-design.de/com/index2.htm
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 05:43:21PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
since i updated to hl 3.1.1.1c1 my server starts 2 hlds_amd processes???
why? is that correct? what does the 2nd one do?
9317 ?00:00:01 screen
9318 pts/300:01:14 halfd
9320 pts/301:19:35 hlds_amd
And what if some punk with a keygen gets lucky and generates your key,
then goes and plays CS - then you go to play and it says the key is in
use and you get banned?
As far as I know you'd have to be VERY lucky to do this with WON.
Yes I do know what it is like for this to happen - I bought
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:26:16PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lol dont make me smack you :)
seriously that guy offered me $400 for it and its less than 2 months old.
Retail procs with paperwork and all the warranties on it thru manufacturer
are good.
Why don't you post what you would
Looks like steam is updating again.
Just like Christmas this is =D
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 04:21:19PM -0400, Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
only reason I ask is that I dont take playing 1.6 on steam very seriously,
kev
Why not?
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 10:42:21PM -0400, Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
-On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 04:21:19PM -0400, Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
- only reason I ask is that I dont take playing 1.6 on steam very
-seriously,
-
- kev
-
-Why not?
hmmm. well, couple reasons. The biggest is that every
I LOVE YOU VALVE!
here here =D
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
When you connect to a CS server with the client you get greeted with
the server number, is there a way to rcon this number from the server?
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
I help admin Roob's NS server and it has just recently started acting a
little strangley. Clients seem unable to use their custom sprays.
Not all clients and not the same clients each game and occasionally it's
fine but most of the time all they see is the Half-Life (Y) default instead
of
I have ran several tests with 3.1.1.0 and 3.1.1.1 with 32 players and there
are huge latency difference's. I highly recommend sticking with 3.1.1.0. The
big issue however is no commercial DoD users can play on a 3.1.1.0 server.
One way to kill DoD...
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:19:00PM +1200, Jeremy Brooking wrote:
Can anyone confirm what the issue I was having was?
Lack of patience. When I was running VAC after Valve announced a modules
update it was very always tedious trying to get the new modules.
--
James.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:53:00PM +1200, Jeremy Brooking wrote:
Try reading the error again.
Too late, I deleted it already.
You see its happening _before_ it attempts to download the security
module.
I recall it saying timeout - I would have thought it was timing out
trying to do something
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 12:40:07AM -0500, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
James Clark wrote:
3110b here.
Why wouldn't you use 3110c instead?
Probably =P (game cstrike) (version 46/3.1.1.0/2147)
What ever that is? It's been ages since I did the last update - just
sitting tight till one point six, man
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:59:28PM -0500, Britt wrote:
Is the majority of people running this 3111c? Or are you sticking with the
3110beta ?
I've been watching and see different opinions and info posted regarding the
differences and it seems that CPU usage is still a concern regarding these
- All that having to restart servers after a VAC update.
(ending up with 1000 emails asking why 99% of New Zealands Gaming
Servers are down and having little IRC sh*t's spamming I skipped school
to play cs now the servers arent even working)
A server restart should take about 1 min at most
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:18:28AM +1200, Jeremy Brooking wrote:
have processes running on the machine to monitor, Drew would be one of
the few people I wouldnt have any doubt in when he says There have ever
been any cheats on these machines
I believe Drew as well.
though my opinion means
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 03:19:38PM +0200, [TD]MoD wrote:
You should try sv_voiceenable 0... see how it goes
I don't need to try it - thats what I use.
--
James.
And it didn't lower cpu usage?
Nothing signigicant that I noticed. I'm not about to start flicking it
on and off to
However I would love to not let them change the min_rate and max_rate
and some others. Should be a way to disable those from rcon and need to
be done via the config only.
If you put what you want in your server.cfg it will at least be put back
to the defaults on map change. At least this is
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 12:21:20AM +0200, John Oxley wrote:
Not possible, I don't have access to the varsity firewall. Can anyone put the
file(s) on a webpage for me.
Even if you had the files you'd be screwed - more than likely.
Add -insecure to your command line and get cheating death.
--
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 09:04:39PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
My 32 player server only shows above 1% cpu usage when the player count gets
over 12-15 (hits 60-70% by 32 tho..). Thats on a 1800+ AMD
1% @ 12-15 then 60-70 @ 32 sounds very stange measuring issue?
Not really, hlds is an
use mutt =)
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 03:59:48PM -0700, Jedi wrote:
I guarantee that if you treated people in real life they people are
treated on these lists you'd be spitting blood and teeth.
Ha. Nah, he'd just have no mates... probably spend too much time talking
to people on a mailling list arguing
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:55:18AM +1200, Simon Garner wrote:
Hi guys/Valve,
I was just wondering if you were aware of the following problem. It only
started occurring to me since a few weeks (maybe a month or so) ago, so
I'm guessing it's an issue with a recent VAC update.
Now that I think
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 12:11:05PM +1200, Simon Garner wrote:
Hmm well, depends which way you look at the map I suppose. If HL calls
up and down Z, then Z it is.
Linear algebra.
http://www.anth.org.uk/NCT/images/Plancoor.gif
--
James.
___
To
Anyone out there have a mirror of the RC2.65 Firearms Linux Server?
Of the 5 or 6 Mirrors listed on the firearmsmod site non seem to work =(
Cheers,
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:58:41PM -0800, m0gely wrote:
James Clark wrote:
Anyone out there have a mirror of the RC2.65 Firearms Linux Server?
Of the 5 or 6 Mirrors listed on the firearmsmod site non seem to work =(
Cheers,
James.
This seamed to work for me (a listed mirror):
ftp
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 07:52:09AM +0100, Grayback wrote:
I have the same problem, P4 2GHz with 1Go DDR, and redhat 7.2.
A debian will be better? (I can't install freebsd)
Yes.
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 08:26:00PM +0100, Smets Jan wrote:
My friend was playin' CS and got IMed, and MSN came up in its
usually way in the lower right, and as it came up, his screen
basically turned into a flickering wallhack As soon as MSN
went away, his screen went back to normal. I
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:27:45PM -0800, Ronin wrote:
I wouldn't count on going to 2500+ speeds. That's a pretty damn healthy
jump (600Mhz or so). Buying a processor for the express intent to OC is
fine and dandy, but that's not what you want to do on a system that you plan
on making your
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:14:05PM -0500, Me wrote:
I forgot to mention that I have no mods running. I'm runnin NS. I don't
know if that uses more CPU than CS or TFC.
Click!
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:36:29PM -0800, m0gely wrote:
the 44% utilization. I was expecting something around
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:51:19PM -0600, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Heh, yeah, you made things so much clearer with your bottom post to the
top post and not trimming anything else away ;)
That is why he shouldn't have top posted, it ruins the flow.
--
James.
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 12:58:16PM +1300, Jeremy Brooking wrote:
I plan on running CD for a few days optional, until people get the hint
to install it.
Do what I do. Don't run C-D during the week and make it required during
the weekend. I'm starting to get the feeling that C-D is going to
. Valve know.
--
James.
---
Andrew A. Chen
Divo Networks
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, James Clark wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 02:58:14PM -0800, Andrew A. Chen wrote:
Hey, quick question about these log lines:
L 03/02/2003 - 14:50:37: #deMo :: wow sir1431563145 connected,
address
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:08:47PM +1030, vOrTeX wrote:
Hi,
I see no difference, the log has always looked like this for me :/
Feb 27 14:51:57 games logger:
L 02/27/2003 - 14:51:57: Secure: shit12662700541 was detected cheating
and dropped from the server.
For all those that want
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:11:40PM -0500, Justin Mitchell wrote:
Yah, if i recall correctly 1.3 used gobs more cpu than previous versions. I
had to shut down my server b/c of it.
- Multicast spectator added.
- Voice communication added. -- hate it (so much)
I'd say these did it. Not entirely
-network.net/chnetphp/
--
James.
- Original Message -
From: James Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: HLDS Linux List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:06 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] [OT] [UA] Cheating-Death
A big thank you to the UA team on reviving Cheating-Death.
I had a quick
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:46:06PM -0500, Tyler Overkill Schwend wrote:
The readme for Cheating-Death says:
Cheating-Death 2.2 for Linux Servers
http://www.unitedadmins.com/cdeath/
NOTICE:
---
Cheating-Death does not work with MODs that can use Valve's
anti-cheat (VAC).
This means
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:23:52PM -0500, Tyler Overkill Schwend wrote:
The UA forums are useless... full of a bunch of n00bs all asking
the same question regarding the client. I'm having problems with
the server... It loads, runs fine for a while, and after about 5
minutes, boom. Crash. And
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:47:15PM -0500, Tyler Overkill Schwend wrote:
Ok, that looks to have done it. Now... What's with the movement
when in spec? I seem to notice this happening again, where you
float in a diamond while in spectator mode.
You'll get used to it =)
--
James.
Is it just me or has no one said anything in the last 18hours?
List problems?
I wish you would gib bodies in CS =)
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 07:57:15PM -0800, Timothy Lynn wrote:
Thus spaketh [EMAIL PROTECTED] on :
: Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Map configuration
:
:
: Make a mapname.cfg in the maps folder with the settings you want.
Double check that. I always had it in the cstrike root, which I know
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:30:18AM -0600, the Professor wrote:
He is right about being able to run his server any way he wants.
That is right, he can run it how he wants. If that means changing all of
his players names so be it, it is up to the player to protect themselves
(i.e. read only
.tar.gz
--
James.
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 04:50:49AM +0100, Sebastian wrote:
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Hi guys,
just a short question, I am planing on releasing a mappack, for the clients
I will make an installer, for all server admins I will make...
Yeah,
... 300+ CS maps on it
Thats [EMAIL PROTECTED] right?
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 09:20:17PM +1300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No,
Stupid users are how virii spread.
Not always.
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 12:13:50AM -0800, Brian A. Stumm wrote:
Forget that fancy crap.
Here here. I use Mutt.
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 10:58:53PM -0500, Kerry Dorsey wrote:
Even WITH VAC, the cheating is unbearable. Against the modern hack, VAC is
completely ineffective. Any noob w/ a late version of *(insert fav hack
here) can run around in virtually any server w/ aibots, wallhacks, ESP, etc.
Only
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:48:06PM -0500, Justin Mitchell wrote:
To insecure mode I go.
Let us know if that fixes the problem
Yes, fixed the problem.
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:27:51AM -0500, Matt wrote:
Could this be the end of the HL Linux server as we know it?
Only if it's true. Always take Slashdot posts with a grain of salt.
If it was true, and the linux server disappeared - i'd stop playing CS
and running CS servers.
I wonder if the
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:05:04PM -0600, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
my servers have been getting that alos in the last few days
I've gotten that a couple of times :\
I thought it was something I'd done!
Man that was driving me nuts last night.
To insecure mode I go.
--
James.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:07:01PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, it wasn't an official Press Release. It was just a simple news post.
These are not anywhere close to being written up like a Press Release.
What I find interesting, is that this Linux list responds and complains more
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 04:03:02PM +1300, James Clark wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:07:01PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, it wasn't an official Press Release. It was just a simple news post.
These are not anywhere close to being written up like a Press Release.
What I find
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 04:11:58PM +1300, Jeremy Brooking wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 16:06, James Clark wrote:
*A good example of this would be that idiotic grammar thread.
Oops =)
Or anything posted by Eric (the Deacon remix)
Absolutely
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:23:49PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
check over here...
http://joe.to/32players.html
great reference on how to make them.
also has premade player spawn entity files.
http://maps.joe.to/ents
--agenthh
Seems he even has a bunch for download:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 07:15:19AM -0600, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Yes, I've seen people with wallhacks and aimbots, sometimes
both. And something someone referred to as speedhack, but
this one wasn't proved.
I saw a working speed hack about a week ago. Banned on sight.
I too have seen
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:52:27PM -0500, Tyler Overkill Schwend wrote:
Well I guess mostly this was directed at The Deacon. I think
MOST people prefer forums...
Thats because MOST people like waiting for webpages to load. Forums get
very hard to keep up with, I find. Go away for a week
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:07:53PM -0500, Tyler Overkill Schwend wrote:
Would y'all use an HLDS_Linux forum if I set one up?
I wouldn't. I don't think it is a bad idea, some people might like it.
I like email.
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:03:09PM -0600, Jay Carter wrote:
what's it going to take to get some action from you guys?
Silence doesn't have to mean there is no action. It's the time of year
when people take time off work gets a bit lax etc. No news is good news -
lets hope like hell!
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:46:21PM -0800, HoundDawg wrote:
LOL... but, I haven't seen those types reply yet... they must be on
vacation.
HoundDawg
We're just working too damn =
--
James.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:52:15AM -0800, Erik Johnson wrote:
All of the Valve mailing lists will be down this coming weekend from Friday
the 13th to Monday the 16th.
Dodgy time to start moving, what out for black cats and witches!
--
James.
___
To
Has anyone seen this before?
--
KKrcon version 2.11 running in interactive mode
Server: blah.blah.co.nz
Port: 27015
Type 'q' to quit.
kkrcon status
Error: No challenge response
--
FROM CHANGELOG:-
*) Fixed module bug: No error would be returned if you try to Rcon to a working
IP on an
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 11:41:16PM +0100, Rene Luckow wrote:
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 22:12, Mike Guadagnino wrote:
Hi there -
Up till now I have banned players that VAC detects, no questions
asked... as it is usually someone with an obviously moronic name and/or
behavior. Recently
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 12:35:45PM +1300, Jeremy Brooking wrote:
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 12:18, James Clark wrote:
Doesn't mean it can't be discussed again =)
Get him to remove and reinstall CS, that should fix it. He's got
24hrs to do something other than play the game
nobody STATED for how long bans last
Yes. Eric did.
(ok, there was ONE person who said that, but we need confirmation)
and there was NOTHING conclusive about it
Eric, IMO would be a trust worthy source...
Maybe a lot of topics mentioning VAC, but very little VAC-related.
If you haven't
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 10:37:41AM +, Guðmundur Ö. Ingvarsson wrote:
Okay, just to get this all straight
A first time offender gets banned 24 hours right? If not that should be
acceptable
A second time offender should get a week ban.
A third time offender is permanantly banned.
This
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:16:22AM -0600, Rusty Zipper wrote:
Quick question for you ner.. er, guys, about VAC. I have had it running on
my servers for some time now, and I've NEVER seen it catch anyone. Am I
doing something wrong or what? I mean, it says Server is Secure when it
starts up,
A policy that allows for one warning is a license to steal until caught.
- UNIX system administration handbook.
Meaning that people, like myself, would no longer be able to play CS
until we either purchased a new CD for a new CD Key or stole one,
if we were cheating or if VAC had a
How many software products do you use that are 100% accurate and
stable, not only for you, but for thousands of users on thousands of
different machines with thousands of different configurations?
Windows 95 =) bwahahhaha
___
To unsubscribe, edit
I may be biased, but I don't think that's a good idea until VAC is
100% accurate
I agree.
(which is highly improbably of ever becoming a reality.)
I don't agree.
Then im sure youd be able to name 1 piece of software that is 100%
secure and foolproof.
The argument wasn't
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
