Thanks for the update Erik. I hope they find out who is behind it.
- Original Message -
From: Erik Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:19 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] Steam Status
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked
Rock wrote:
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Last night late when the steam site came back up I think they posed that they were
getting DOS'd and the site was on the same pipe as the rest so everything was down.
Wounder if that is the case again today.
Nice single point of
]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] steam down?
Ryan Schulze wrote:
oh come on valve, you have had steam out for quite a while now, you
should know by now that steam updates need a certain amoutn of
ressources on your end to deleiver to all thoose folks that are forced
to update.
I'm not much for Steam
Change the bans to non permanent ones.
banid 300 STEAM...
That way they don't get written by writeid, and are forgotten when the
server restarts.
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 21:56, john wrote:
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Arie M wrote:
john wrote:
Hi,
The system I use for banning relies on a central
Hi,
The system I use for banning relies on a central banfile that is updated
and exec'd on mapchange by means of the server config file. However, if a
ban is removed from the central banfile, the server still remembers all
that have been previously banned, unless they are removed manually or the
john wrote:
Hi,
The system I use for banning relies on a central banfile that is updated
and exec'd on mapchange by means of the server config file. However, if a
ban is removed from the central banfile, the server still remembers all
that have been previously banned, unless they are removed
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Arie M wrote:
john wrote:
Hi,
The system I use for banning relies on a central banfile that is updated
and exec'd on mapchange by means of the server config file. However, if a
ban is removed from the central banfile, the server still remembers all
that have been
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Brian A. Stumm wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Alfred Reynolds wrote:
This is a bug, it shouldn't change these files every time (note that it
will occasionally when we need to add new functionality, but this
shouldn't be often). We are looking into it.
On a related
:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Steam Update autoexec.cfg?
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Brian A. Stumm wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Alfred Reynolds wrote:
This is a bug, it shouldn't change these files every time (note that it
will occasionally when we need to add new
On Thursday 18 December 2003 05:45, Brian A. Stumm wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Alfred Reynolds wrote:
This is a bug, it shouldn't change these files every time (note
that it will occasionally when we need to add new functionality,
but this shouldn't be often). We are looking into it.
On
Care to make any sense at all.
This one is just not worth my time.
- Original Message -
From: i rule [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: pleas idle in #gtfo with Brett Fernicola (Was: [hlds_linux]
Steam detection, but it didn't
(Was: [hlds_linux]
Steam detection, but it didn't ban?)
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Why is Brett still on this list? He obviously profits nothing from it,
since he's just that good.
At what?
Brett, post a link to your 'So Called' CAL-i matches, for us all to see!
I for one am looking forward
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:13 AM
Subject: Re: pleas idle in #gtfo with Brett Fernicola (Was: [hlds_linux]
Steam detection, but it didn't ban?)
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Why is Brett still on this list? He obviously profits nothing from it,
since he's just
(Was: [hlds_linux]
Steam detection, but it didn't ban?)
If you actually read my posts I used to play Cal, I have no time left
with
school to play as hardcore as I used to, but I can still jump in any
clan
scrim and kick ass like its my job.
Get over it, or just play me and shut up is all I have to say
FatDaddy wrote:
I move that Brett be banned from the list. His comments are beyond
insulting, vulgar and useless. Whatever knowledge he may bring to this
mailing is hidden behind a shroud of immaturity.
For the good of the community please do not offer any further response
to his rants. Please do
right on, plz act alfred
-- Original Message --
From: FatDaddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: pleas idle in #gtfo with Brett Fernicola (Was: [hlds_linux]
Steam detection, but it didn't ban?)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 03:07:57 -0500
Gentlemen,
Please
is either.
TLP
- Original Message -
From: FatDaddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:07 AM
Subject: RE: pleas idle in #gtfo with Brett Fernicola (Was: [hlds_linux]
Steam detection, but it didn't ban?)
Gentlemen,
Please put your dicks away. I do not care
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:04 AM
Subject: Re: pleas idle in #gtfo with Brett Fernicola (Was: [hlds_linux]
Steam detection, but it didn't ban?)
I've helped people many a time with certain shit so eat a dick.
I profit a few good lauphs from dumb shits like you.
- Original
(Was:
[hlds_linux] Steam detection, but it didn't ban?)
Again - as Valve requested please refrain from the language.
I am certain
it is not the sort of language you use on a daily basis with
other mature
people. Please refrain from using it here.
Shane
PHXX Staff
- Original Message -
From
(Was: [hlds_linux]
Steam detection, but it didn't ban?)
agreed, can we please get him off the list? This is the latest in an
ongoing line of immature, uncalled for abuse from someone who adds
nothing to the list. I asked some weeks ago, why are you on the list at
all Brett?
--
Nathan Woodcock
magnet all over your 1U server
box.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 5:48 PM
Subject: pleas idle in #gtfo with Brett Fernicola (Was: [hlds_linux] Steam
detection, but it didn't ban?)
f*** it, i can't resist.
--- Brett
Thanks man, what more would you like to know in specifics.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 7:13 AM
Subject: Re: AW: [hlds_linux] Steam detection, but it didn't ban?
Brett,
You make a vary valid point about Hackers
The NetCrawler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: AW: [hlds_linux] Steam detection, but it didn't ban?
Brett Fernicola wrote:
Yes I am a cocky son of a bitch, but you have to understand I am one of
few
admins who runs their server simply
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: AW: [hlds_linux] Steam detection, but it didn't ban?
Truth Hurts dont it.
Let me guess, you server runs VAC and when you read all of that you got
pissed cause your releazied I just took a piss all over your
I second that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Bunce
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 12:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: AW: [hlds_linux] Steam detection, but it didn't ban?
This is a multi-part message in MIME format
Why is Brett still on this list? He obviously profits nothing from it,
since he's just that good.
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
Brett Fernicola wrote:
a bunch of stupidity
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Why is Brett still on this list? He obviously profits nothing from it,
since he's just that good.
At what?
Brett, post a link to your 'So Called' CAL-i matches, for us all to see!
I for one am looking forward to seeing the next Heaton in action.
]
Subject: Re: pleas idle in #gtfo with Brett Fernicola (Was: [hlds_linux]
Steam detection, but it didn't ban?)
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 16:43:56 +1030
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Why is Brett still on this list? He obviously profits nothing from it,
since he's just that good.
At what?
Brett, post a link
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ok? we just told you. vac sucks obviously. there are many bugs. it
doesn't
catch many of the hacks. what are you waiting for? valve to respond
saying, 'yea, there are bugs and it doesn't work all the time?'
you'll probably come back
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you should check yourself man. You got serious personality issues.
Talk about positive energy? Every single bit of your rants could be viewed as
the same. How do you expect positive responses when you keep being an ass in
return.
Actually he only wanted an
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: AW: [hlds_linux] Steam detection, but it didn't ban?
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ok? we just told you. vac sucks obviously. there are many bugs. it
doesn't
catch many
Hahahahhaha! Man, Brett, you never cease to entertain with your
meaningless and childish drivel. Keep up the good work, you real big
dog, you.
And don't you go letting me down, claiming that you write this tripe
without the utmost sincerety. If I found out you're not as stupid as you
portray
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 1:12 PM
Subject: RE: AW: [hlds_linux] Steam detection, but it didn't ban?
Hahahahhaha! Man, Brett, you never cease to entertain with your
meaningless and childish drivel. Keep up the good work, you real big
dog, you.
And don't you go
According to the great words of Brett Fernicola:
Any real Proffesional level CS player like my self
You actually make a living playing CS? Wow! I didn't realize the
tournament awards had grown so high!
-Mad
--
A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a
proof. And when
According to the great words of Brett Fernicola:
Follow my advice and you too will have a good server.
I can't wait to check out your server. Although I'm sure it's full 24/7
since it's so hot, so I'll never be able to get on. Any chance you can
reserve me a slot?
-Mad
--
Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: AW: [hlds_linux] Steam detection, but it didn't ban?
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ok? we just told you. vac sucks obviously. there are many
bugs
and you too will have a good server.
You should charge money and have seminars for this level of advice.
- Original Message -
From: Timothy Lynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 1:12 PM
Subject: RE: AW: [hlds_linux] Steam detection, but it didn't
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:48 PM
Subject: pleas idle in #gtfo with Brett Fernicola (Was: [hlds_linux] Steam
detection, but it didn't ban?)
f*** it, i can't resist.
--- Brett Fernicola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I am a cocky son of a bitch, but you have to understand I am one
Hi all,
My Steam DoD v1.1 linux server show like 3xx ping in the master server list,
but when I or other players join the server, it show back the correct ping
like 3x in game, although it can fix by refresh 1 or 2 times to my server in
the main page or put my server to the favorites section, but
Hi all,
My Steam DoD v1.1 linux server show like 3xx ping in the master server list,
but when I or other players join the server, it show back the correct ping
like 3x in game, although it can fix by refresh 1 or 2 times to my server in
the main page or put my server to the favorites section, but
Hi all,
My Steam DoD v1.1 linux server show like 3xx ping in the master server list,
but when I or other players join the server, it show back the correct ping
like 3x in game, although it can fix by refresh 1 or 2 times to my server in
the main page or put my server to the favorites section, but
Wow - according to that STEAM site link Jorma gave me, the linux server file
is something like 700+ mb in size (I'm guessing it's the same as the windows
one...) - is that right?
Jay.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
Jay Anstiss wrote:
Wow - according to that STEAM site link Jorma gave me, the linux server file
is something like 700+ mb in size (I'm guessing it's the same as the windows
one...) - is that right?
ftp://ftp.blueyonder.co.uk/blueyondergames/halflife/steam/server
Jens
We have released an updated dedicated server engine binary. This update
fixes the exploit published by SYZo[SND] (release on Wednesday). The
update also contains a fix for kick messages not being displayed in the
UI properly.
This release is not mandatory so you will need to manually update at
If any update should be mandatory, isn't it this one?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alfred
Reynolds
Sent: 21 November 2003 01:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] Steam update: engine binaries
We have released an updated
yer can we make it mandatory
- Original Message -
From: Peter Holcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 12:54 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Steam update: engine binaries
If any update should be mandatory, isn't it this one?
-Original Message
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Alfred Reynolds wrote:
We have released an updated dedicated server engine binary. This update
fixes the exploit published by SYZo[SND] (release on Wednesday). The
update also contains a fix for kick messages not being displayed in the
UI properly.
This release is not
, 2003 2:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] Steam update: engine binaries
We have released an updated dedicated server engine binary. This update
fixes the exploit published by SYZo[SND] (release on Wednesday). The
update also contains a fix for kick messages not being displayed
Just log the output of hlds_run to a file to check what it downloads.
Passwords don't expire BUT if you use an account on another machine it
will invalidate the password on the first machine (so use 1 account per
machine).
If you run with -autoupdate then all you will ever need to do is issue
an
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfred Reynolds
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 2:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] Steam update: engine binaries
We have released an updated dedicated server engine binary. This update
fixes the exploit published by SYZo[SND] (release on Wednesday
Yay! A response! cool - maybe this issue will get fixed soon.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alfred
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Steam update: engine binaries
We are talking
thx for the security update. just a thought, there was tons of
non-patched 3.1.1.1 server, even 3.1.1.0 out there. could won servers
stop auth with the outdated and force them upgrade with the latest
patches? the non-patched server also affect the reputation on hosting
Valve product, as some
be frustrating when you're reliant
on someone else to help make your product or service work properly! :)
-- trog
Original Message
From: Vernon Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 2:22 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Steam update: engine binaries
Yay
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Brooking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:25 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Steam doesnt use DNS to find its resources?
What does my ISP have to do with valve hard coding addresses?
Its picking one
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Brooking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And whats that got to do with the issue in hand?
The issue is name resolution. Verisign stupidity can (and has) effect that.
Nope it didnt you might want to find out what verisign thing actually
did before making such
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Steam doesnt use DNS to find its resources?
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Brooking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:25 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Steam doesnt use DNS to find its
That explains everything.
F Microsoft.
- Original Message -
From: Frank Stollar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 6:53 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Steam Update Deleting all files !
gault wrote:
i'm sure that you just hire microsoft
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Hi,
Do i need one steam account per logical server (process hlds) to get -autoupdate
working ??? is it a joke or is it me going in the wrong way ?
Cheers.
--
microsoft doesn't mean dumb. but such an practice need to be changed.
Frank Stollar wrote:
gault wrote:
i'm sure that you just hire microsoft engeneers !
VALVe was founded by people from Microsoft...
SCNR
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list
On Monday, October 06, 2003 8:02 AM [GMT+1200=NZT],
Christopher Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did anyone read this news item?
http://www.ukterrorist.com/newsarchive/3937/
Sounds like a bad idea [tm],
Sounds like bullshit to me :)
-Simon
___
To
aye. bullshit (tm) indeed. on various occasions VALVe representatives have
already said steam will remain a free service, and
hl/cs/tfc/dmc/ricochet/etc will not require anymore moneys than the cd key
purchased earlier.
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Simon Garner wrote:
On Monday, October 06, 2003 8:02 AM
Invader Zim wrote:
aye. bullshit (tm) indeed. on various occasions VALVe representatives have
already said steam will remain a free service, and
hl/cs/tfc/dmc/ricochet/etc will not require anymore moneys than the cd key
purchased earlier.
Let's hope it stays this way. As of current, Valve is
Yes I know. Jeez get with the program. If you don't run autoupdate every
time your server starts, and start it just with hlds_run direct, you bypass
the delays and bugs and errors in the steam content delivery system. Which
is what the original poster was trying to do. The downside is you
(BarrysWorld/GAME)
GAME DIGITAL LTD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.barrysworld.com/
http://play.game.net/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nick McLaren
Sent: 26 September 2003 16:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] Steam Account
Create a steam account for every HLDS process.
That way the autoupdate works sanely.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
McLaren
Sent: 26 September 2003 16:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] Steam Account per HLDS process
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 4:50 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Steam Account per HLDS process?
Use hldsupdatetool with one steam account on a central box to pull down
the dedicated server files you need, then roll them out to your boxes
via FTP or whatever. You don't need
Nathan Woodcock - BarrysWorld wrote:
Use hldsupdatetool with one steam account on a central box to pull down
the dedicated server files you need, then roll them out to your boxes
via FTP or whatever. You don't need a steam account to run a dedi
server, it runs just like the old version.
What are
- Original Message -
From: James Sykes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Create a steam account for every HLDS process.
That way the autoupdate works sanely.
That's just mad and one of the reasons why steam is failing under
the load atm.
Steve / K
___
James Sykes wrote:
Create a steam account for every HLDS process.
That way the autoupdate works sanely.
What about the ClientRegistry.blob file? Would you need to put each process
under it's own user account on the machine now too? If each steam account is
being run under one user account,
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
Hartland
Sent: 26 September 2003 17:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Steam Account per HLDS process?
- Original Message -
From: James Sykes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Create a steam account for every HLDS process.
That way
We have release an update for Counter-Strike that fixes the shield crash
exploit. As this update is not mandatory you will need to manually run the
update tool to get this update. If you have specified -autoupdate on the
command line the next time you run your server it will update itself.
How to
to
work and update fine.
What am I missing?
-Original Message-
From: Britt Priddy (PZGN) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] ./steam -update and +autoupdate and multiple
servers
Sorry - when I refer to running
I must be doing something wrong but I don't see the drawback yet.
I running about 12 servers with 4 games each, every update is done under one
account and each hlds process is started under a diffrent linux user login.
So one steam account and 48 diffrent users running it. Everything seems
, 2003 7:09 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] ./steam -update and +autoupdate and multiple
servers
I must be doing something wrong but I don't see the drawback yet.
I running about 12 servers with 4 games each, every update is done under
one
account and each hlds process
I am though and it seems to be workign fine.
-Original Message-
From: Britt Priddy (PZGN) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] ./steam -update and +autoupdate and multiple
servers
The only drawback is you
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I'm not really having the same problem, didn't start updating yet... But my concern is
that my customers will see the user and login, how can hide this from my customers...
Anyone ANY suggestion?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nander
Paardekooper
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] ./steam -update and +autoupdate and multiple
servers (2)
This is a multi-part message in MIME
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] ./steam -update and +autoupdate and multiple
servers
ok, to take this a step further.
On one machine, we could have 5 servers, but the way we have it set up
is all 5 servers have different_ip:27015
?
Britt
- Original Message -
From: Argus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] ./steam -update and +autoupdate and multiple
servers
ok, to take this a step further.
On one machine, we could have 5 servers
Geoff King said:
Info was posted on the HLApps list.
Here's the original message. Note that you have to query *each* region
to get a 'full' list. Alfred later warned that if tools did this
excessively he may have to impose rate limits.
-EvilGrin
Thanks! Has anyone created a qstat rc file
Its bad enough that I now have to registere every f*cking computer
seperately and then have ot figure out how the hell im going to reimage
and then stick the friends lists and account details per computer on
again each time I put on a new HDD image.
I have an internet cafe as well...
just in case
Once again a client thing.
I installed steam, told me game was unavailable (Pardon, this game I
have paid for and downloaded 350mb for isnt available ?) then it tells
me I need to clear the cache before I can play this game.
I delete the cache, I restart steam because it couldnt properly delete
-
From: Drew Broadley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:17 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] Steam: CS just disappeared ?
Once again a client thing.
I installed steam, told me game was unavailable (Pardon, this game I
have paid for and downloaded 350mb
As the subject says Steam Forums are back online :)
Steve / K
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
I'm having a strange problem with my server after upgrading to
Steam/1.6. In the Steam server browser, my servers ping shows up
anywhere from 300-600ms. But if you add the server to favorites, or join
the server, the actual pings are around 60-80. I think this is why my
server is staying pretty
] steam it baby
so you must be looking like the person in this picture :)
http://www.gamequarter.be/gfx/upload/deadsteam.jpg
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 12:02 PM
Subject: AW: [hlds_linux] steam it baby
i am
Is it just me, or is the account creation screwed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hlds_l]$ ./steam -create [email] [pass] no no
Checking bootstrapper version ...
Creating Account
Connection Reset
I have tried several times removing the clientblob (rm -rf
~/.steam/ClientRegistry.blob)
and also tried running
Erik van den Berg wrote:
so you must be looking like the person in this picture :)
http://www.gamequarter.be/gfx/upload/deadsteam.jpg
Hillarious. Can we use that? Who owns the copyright?
Florian.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or
Well after nearly two days to dismal failure Im now downloading
steam cached install from fileshack which is maxing out my line
at 250Kb/s instead of the 400b/s / constant disconnects that
is steam.
Conclusion for those of you that havent managed to get it via
steam give up and download it like a
here's one, but the server might be a litte busy:
http://games.xs4all.nl/downloads/downloads.php?dl=79
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Monil Patel wrote:
Can anyone give me i direct url to a steaminstall_cs.exe which i can wget
from linux?
--
Manager
+44 (0)7732 901 493
www.reload-network.co.uk
- Demand the best, demand Reload-Network
- Original Message -
From: Invader Zim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] steam it baby
here's one, but the server might
Florian -
Thanks for posting the links to Steam CS on adminmod.org - that saved me so
much time!
Appreciated!
- Original Message -
From: Florian Zschocke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 7:55 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] steam it baby
Brian A. Stumm wrote:
Whoa, I understood the LAN part but somehow overlooked this part. You
gotta be kinding me... I just got done warning a local Monthly LAN
organization that has a deal scheduled on the 21st of the month about this
but didn't even think about the dev side...
I myself don't care
Ok...I was finally able to update my server and now when I try to connect
from a workstation to my server, I fire up Steam and I get Checking for
Steam updates... and then Fatal Error: Failed to connect to any... As of
now, I have no way of testing my server! Anyone have the same problem?
Mike
-(Deacon)
-Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:25 PM
-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Steam FAQ's (Read first before posting for
-help)
-
-
-Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
- -If desireable, the network administrator of such an event can limit
- -internet access to only the TCP/IP ports which
BlankHello? Thursday release?
http://www.steampowered.com/index.php?area=getsteamnow
There are currently no download locations available.
The Steam 1.0 (non-beta) installer will be made available on Thursday,
September 11.
No news or updates.
___
There probably won't be a release tonight, they are still working on it
which either means something broke. Or they just simply don't have it
finished.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
:P
- Original Message -
From: Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Steam client version?
There probably won't be a release tonight, they are still working on it
which either means something broke. Or they just
Mad Scientist wrote:
If everybody read the information provided before asking questions,
well, there's probably be nobody left using this list...
I think people ask this question inspite of having read that
because it is so unbelievable, hoping for Valve to realize what a
terrible idea this is
If everybody read the information provided before asking questions,
well, there's probably be nobody left using this list...
Nah, we'd have Eric (Decon) to keep us company.
But back on the subject... is valve really trying to kill off the userbase
that it strove to attain?
I might be a rare
901 - 1000 of 1081 matches
Mail list logo
