[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Ok, now I found the Panotools' step-by-step instructions on how to compile hugin and all other relevent programs and I think I made it, hugin opens normally. Of course, autopano-sift throws me with error code 255 and now I'll search the internet for answer on that. --~--~-~--~~

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Harry, Sorry I am even later spotting your reply than you were in replying to my original message. I am just back from a trip and doing a check on here for things that might have been posted while I was away and I noticed it. Yes. The as the pop-up with the error message is not selectable/Cop

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Ok... I expected something just like this, thank you! So I'll just try to install all packages necessary, first this "libc6- dev", and then try to figure out the rest. Trying to carry on, thanks a lot! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you a

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Am Sonntag 26 Oktober 2008 schrieb Kiikonen: > Building C object CMakeFiles/cmTryCompileExec.dir/testCCompiler.o > /usr/bin/gcc   -o CMakeFiles/cmTryCompileExec.dir/testCCompiler.o   - > c /home/kiikonen/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/testCCompiler.c > /home/kiikonen/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/testCCompiler.c:

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Hi. Thanks a lot for your great effort on upgrading this awesome software! I'm just having overwhelming difficulties to set it up on my Ubuntu. I'm a quite new Ubuntu user and would like to make things in the straight and easy way. (at least the easy way for me...) So I'd like to ask that could t

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Thanks all the developpers and contributors for 0.7.0 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Hi George, Sorry for replying this late. I hoped Ippei would pick it up and than I forgot about it. This final error you mention is most probably a "non-fatal" error by Exiftool. I reported on 6 October: *"I just built the final 0.7.0 but I receive a "non-fatal" exiftool error in the end (maker n

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Are there any news on a Windows installer on sourceforge? I am eager to try it out! On Oct 6, 12:01 am, "Erik Krause" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Sunday, October 05, 2008 um 0:34 schrieb Bruno Postle: > > > Binary releases are expected to follow in the next few days. > > I'd be very grateful

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

PS having generated control points with an earlier version of Hugin I was able to save the project file and then open it in the current, released version. It then performed a stitch as expected producing a resulting file that I was happy with.However ... it ended the stitching process with

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Ippei, Harry, I have just tried Ippei's new release. I installed it on my PowerMac G5 machine. I also installed your new Autopano-SIFT-C plug-in replacing the previous one in "Application Support" I opened a recent project and tried using Autopano-SIFT-C to generate a few control points ... th

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Royal Photographic Society (UK) magazine to spread the word about hugin locally; and I think that it is getting out amongst the UK photographers. Peter. Peter Gawthrop [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lightspacewater.net From: "Pablo d'Angelo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Pablo d'Angelo wrote: > > It does not >> matter much to me if the GSOC projects are brought now or when the >> integration branch is finished. I just don't want to lose track of >> where the up to date changes are. > > To avoid delays and expose the new functionality earlier, I'd favor an >

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Bruno Postle wrote: > On Tue 07-Oct-2008 at 20:54 +0200, Pablo d'Angelo wrote: >> We could then merge the gsoc_integration branch into the trunk and >> contine developing the new functionality for the 0.8 release. > > Makes sense to me, who wants to do this? Probably there will be > some confl

[hugin-ptx] exiftool option (was Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released)

Tom Sharpless wrote: > One way to deal with exiftool problems is to not use exiftool. > > Some time ago I put a patch on the hugin tracker that makes running > exiftool an option in the preferences tab. I was told I couldn't > commit because it would introduce a UI label needing translation, and

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

On Tue 07-Oct-2008 at 20:54 +0200, Pablo d'Angelo wrote: > >As for the further development, I agree with Garry that we should do an >svn cp hutin/trunk hugin/branches/release-0.7.0 >to create a stable branch, which could be used for urgent bugfixes, >should the need occur. Ok, done based on rc6/

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Gerry Patterson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Pablo d'Angelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > > > We could then merge the gsoc_integration branch into the trunk and > contine developing the new functionality for the 0.8 release. > > Any obj

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Pablo d'Angelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > We could then merge the gsoc_integration branch into the trunk and > contine developing the new functionality for the 0.8 release. > > Any objections? > > ciao >Pablo > > > Hi all, I haven't been watching the GS

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Hi Bruno, Bruno Postle wrote: > Congratulations to everyone responsible for this release! Thanks a lot for doing the final hard work for making the release possible. Also thanks to all other developers who made this happen. I have been very busy with day time work and other commitments lately

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

On 2008-10-06, at 23:42, Harry van der Wolf wrote: > Ippei, > > for the RC6 George Row mentioned: > > >However each time there has been an error message at the end saying > >that "There has been a stitching error - please report the whole > >text" (at least I THINK that is what it said I have sen

[hugin-ptx] Re: Roadmap to 0.7.1 (was Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released)

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Bruno Postle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun 05-Oct-2008 at 23:36 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: > > > >- IMO it is too early for Fahim's and Onur's projects, so once Tim has > >integrated Celeste I propose that we release the gsoc_integration branch > >as 0.7.1 bet

[hugin-ptx] Re: Roadmap to 0.7.1 (was Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released)

On Sun 05-Oct-2008 at 23:36 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: > >- IMO it is too early for Fahim's and Onur's projects, so once Tim has >integrated Celeste I propose that we release the gsoc_integration branch >as 0.7.1 beta 1. It would be neat if we can pull this together as a >Christmas present. Four

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Hi Mac fans One way to deal with exiftool problems is to not use exiftool. Some time ago I put a patch on the hugin tracker that makes running exiftool an option in the preferences tab. I was told I couldn't commit because it would introduce a UI label needing translation, and there was a pre-r

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Ippei, for the RC6 George Row mentioned: >However each time there has been an error message at the end saying >that "There has been a stitching error - please report the whole >text" (at least I THINK that is what it said I have sent it away now. > >I have the text in case it is needed ... but I

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

On 2008-10-06, at 07:29, Bruno Postle wrote: > On Mon 06-Oct-2008 at 00:01 +0200, Erik Krause wrote: >> Am Sunday, October 05, 2008 um 0:34 schrieb Bruno Postle: >> >>> Binary releases are expected to follow in the next few days. >> >> I'd be very grateful if there where some. Best available from

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Bruno, I just built the final 0.7.0 but I receive a "non-fatal" exiftool error in the end (maker notes not recognised) for some sets of images. for other sets it works OK even though none of the sets do contain maker notes (beats me). I will investigate that one before release. As it is a "non-fat

[hugin-ptx] Roadmap to 0.7.1 (was Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released)

congratulations to everybody who has contributed to the 0.7.0 release. Bruno Postle wrote: > for Windows somebody (not me) > needs to create an installer - See Yuval's email, subject: "Misc > release stuff". to repeat again: the instructions and the code for the installer are in SVN. I'll be

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

On Mon 06-Oct-2008 at 00:01 +0200, Erik Krause wrote: >Am Sunday, October 05, 2008 um 0:34 schrieb Bruno Postle: > >> Binary releases are expected to follow in the next few days. > >I'd be very grateful if there where some. Best available from one >place - preferable the sourceforge download page

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Am Sunday, October 05, 2008 um 0:34 schrieb Bruno Postle: > Binary releases are expected to follow in the next few days. I'd be very grateful if there where some. Best available from one place - preferable the sourceforge download page. As soon as there are binaries please announce on Panotool

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Big big thanks. I had written a long, moving post about how much Hugin has evolved etc. but my sucky internet connection eated it. Short version, thanks to everyone involved, Hugin rocks big time. Waiting for the binaries/packages/installers to spread the words to the less techie friends :) On Oc

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.7.0 released

Bruno, This is great! Thank-you very much for your tireless efforts on getting this release out. I also want to send a big thank you to all the other developers and testers in the hugin-ptx community. Best Regards, - Gerry On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Bruno Postle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot