John Benik wrote:
We are trying to find the best way to stop using discrete profiles for at least
our virtual tape environment. What is the best way to do this, we know one
way is through the use of VLPOOL statements in the RMM parms, but this
means deleteing all existing profiles?? We
Gigantic news from the z team today. All the major press outlets have the
story. Looks like IBM may be answering at least one part of the in 10
years question a little early. :-) Watch the wrap!
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/26/technology/26compute.html
Walt Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On 4/25/2007 3:52 PM, Paul Schuster wrote:
Hello: Is there a way to prevent the SYSDSN ENQ from being removed
when you
dynamically de-allocate a data set?
There is the parameter S99NORES to prevent the ENQ from
Wow.
I guess that game of Trek the sysprogs have tucked away in one of the APF-
Authorised libraries is going to really kick butt now...
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:30:48 +0900, Timothy Sipples
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gigantic news from the z team today. All the major press outlets have the
I'm (half) thinking of getting a PS3 (never had a games console) so I
can have a play with Linux on the cell. Support is starting to ship in
the mainline kernel - for the main processor anyway.
Cheap (-ish) way of getting a Blu-ray player as well - Planet Earth
should look awesome.
Anyway, back
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 17:00 -0400, Tim Hare wrote:
You need only one instruction: DOIT
The rest is just operands and microding
g,d, r
Let's hope they get the default for the DO_WHAT_I_MEAN parameter
right.
Shane ...
--
For
...And the official press release is now available:
http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/070426/0244427.html
The http://www.ibm.com/press Web site should have the press release soon,
too, if anyone has Yahoo! blocked.
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
Specializing in
Hi
What are the best methods for software delivery ?
Background
Currently we deliver our software in 3480 cartridge IEBCOPY format
and in CD XMIT format.
We would ike to change our very very old 3480 tape drives to 3590.
--
Miklos Szigetvari
Development Team
ISIS Information Systems
I have about a billion ways - well not quite - to count records in a data set.
I am looking for advise as to what would be the most efficient way to run
either under TSO or BATCH.
We do have FILEAID and a couple of other tools. We are z/OS V1.7.
I want to just find out the total number of
Lizette
Cant think of anything which 'counts' records quicker than DFSORT
James F. Smith
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: 26 April 2007 20:36
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Better way to count records
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 14:34 +0200, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
We would ike to change our very very old 3480 tape drives to 3590.
*DON'T*
3590 is *not* a universal format. I have customers that have STK (Sun)
silos and are unable to use 3590.
Stand alone 3490(E) drives allow external tapes to
The Xbox is dead; long live the Zbox!
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - The easiest, most powerful way to surf a mainframe!
http://www.mackinney.com/products/SIM/simplist.htm
_
Win a webcam! Nominate your friends Windows Live Space in the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Better way to count records
I have about a billion ways - well not quite - to count records in a
data set.
Hi,
There are PTFs available for TriTune (AQM Solutions) and Intune (BMC) to
eliminate use of user key common storage. PTF for TriTune is TPN0049. I
believe the Intune PTF is BQM0022.
PROBLEM DESCRIPTION(S):
I was thinking of a batch SORT also.
Have a Nice Day !
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 8:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Better way to
On Thursday 26 April 2007 08:40, james wrote:
Lizette
Cant think of anything which 'counts' records quicker than DFSORT
James F. Smith
I agree. Sort copy to a dummy output file should work fine.
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
-
How we behave
Good Day Gentle Readers,
I have been looking for a glossary or definition of DFHSM terminology. For
example I would like to find the definition of primary space management. I
have refered to several DFHSM manuals but I cannot find what I am looking for.
I have found how I can apply or
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:36:15 -0400, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have about a billion ways - well not quite - to count records in a data set.
I am looking for advice as to what would be the most efficient way to run
either under TSO or BATCH.
We do have FILEAID and a couple of
In the HSM Implementation Cust. Gde., Storage Admin. Gde. Reference
there is a glossary.
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/r7pdf/dfsms.html
esmie moo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
04/26/2007 09:45 AM
Please respond
Internet or a CD/DVD in zipped TSO XMIT format.
Forget tapes. There are too many incompatible formats.
My $0.02.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:34 AM
To:
Hi
Thank you very much for everybody.
Unfortunatly the internet is not an option from our side , and I think
not an option from the customers side.
They would like to have something in the hand.
Till now the 3480 tape delivery worked.
Robert Justice wrote:
internet, as long as it's done
Thanks Carol,
I found what I was looking for in the DFSMShsm STORAGE ADMINISTRATION GUIDE.
Thanks again.
Carol Srna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the HSM Implementation Cust. Gde., Storage Admin. Gde. Reference
there is a glossary.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:58:36 -0400, Mark Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thursday 26 April 2007 08:40, james wrote:
Lizette
Cant think of anything which 'counts' records quicker than DFSORT
James F. Smith
I agree. Sort copy to a dummy output file should work fine.
--
//COUNT EXEC
All,
Just got bit by this one on one of my Development systems that was just
upgraded to 1.8 2 weeks ago. Symptoms looks like this:
IGW031I PDSE ANALYSIS Start of Report(SMSPDSE1) 570
-data set name-- -vsgt---
PERM.TOL.LOAD2
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:04:06 -0400, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all the ideas. I was hoping for something a little more TSO
oriented where the end user would only see the count of the file. By doing
strictly batch they would need to know JCL and where to look for the
Electronic delivery can save you $$$ if you have state sales tax.
Tapes may get to be real interesting in the near future.
IBM has withdrawn service for the 3490s that fit in an ATL (I think all
models). There may still be a standalone model that you can get service
for. That leaves 3590 and
When reading your email again I think you are really trying to solve a
different problem.
You have long running jobs. How a file is sized, 10 cylinders used in a
10 cylinder data set or 10 cylinders used in a 100 cylinder data set, is
not going to change how fast a job runs. The extra 90
I wonder if publicizing this will cause companies to be more open to
thinking of IBM when they think of large server needs.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:44:55 -0400, Jousma, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Just got bit by this one on one of my Development systems that was just
upgraded to 1.8 2 weeks ago. Symptoms looks like this:
snip
APAR Identifier .. OA20694 Last Changed 07/04/25
IGWLSD
Yep, same here.
The real problem here is that you cannot determine from a V
SMS,PDSE1,ANALYSIS command which latch to free. Had to take the dump,
send it to IBM, and they responded with the proper FREELATCH command.
So it elongated the problem. I just talked with the support center, and
they
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM Announces the Gameframe
I wonder if publicizing this will cause companies to be more open
On 25 Apr 2007 12:33:54 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:16:47 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote:
With the new instructions, I now count 751 instructions documented in the
POO. That's up a lot from the (IIRC) 143 for S/360.
It's called evolution, son. Like it or
---snip---
Thats a common misconceptions; disk drives are DASD's, but not every
DASD is a disk drive. Take the data cell - please!
-unsnip--
Not to mention Storage Tech's Solid State Disk !
Please point me in the right direction (manual , website) I need to get
answers for the following
1) How many ucbs above the line total without going into multiple
LCS etc can z/OS 1.8 support
2) How many ucbs without multiple LCS(?) can a systems support
I thought it
--snip---
nominally the argument is that complexity contributes to confusion and
failures ... KISS is frequently better because it minimizes confusion
which can be major source of failures, vulnerabilities, threats and
exploits. however, another
Clark Morris wrote:
The frustrating thing is that there is no compiler switch to tell most
of the compilers that these instructions can be used because the
target is known. ISV's normally have to hang back on using these
instructions because the target processor may not have the
instruction.
-snip
What are the best methods for software delivery ?
Background
Currently we deliver our software in 3480 cartridge IEBCOPY format and
in CD XMIT format.We would ike to change our very very old 3480 tape
drives to 3590.
Rick Fochtman wrote:
That increased instruction set allows for vastly increased capability,
in spite of the perceived complexity. Simple applications can still be
coded using simple instructions, but more complex requirements can be
met more simply and efficiently by using some of those added
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Latest Principles of Operation
Clark Morris wrote:
The frustrating thing is that there is no
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 12:26 -0300, Clark Morris wrote:
The frustrating thing is that there is no compiler switch to tell most
of the compilers that these instructions can be used
The IBMers contributing to GCC have been doing pretty well on this
front. GCC 4.1 uses 34 new instructions for z9
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:58:01 -0600, Jeffrey D. Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Latest Principles of
Hello,
we are experimenting with getting control of all ADRDSSU calls (the IBM DSS
user interface). To achieve this, we are thinking about renaming ADRDSSU and
supplying our own ADRDSSU frontend which will later call the real IBM
module.
Now my question - has anyone ever renamed modul ADRDSSU?
I have to agree with John. I would suggest building an install package
from XMIT output (or even do a 2 stage XMIT, ie create a PDS with XMIT's
of the different libraries, then XMIT the PDS to a flat file), and make
it available from the internet. If the customer can't get the file via
the
We just migrated from 1.4 to 1.7 on our production lpar about 1.5 weeks
ago.
The first shutdown on 1.7 caused JES2 not to come down clean, thus
forcing an ABEND to end it.
Our second shutdown did the same thing.
All of our NJE line printer are DRAINED.
Every thing looks fine, but I think it may
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 11:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Best practices for software delivery
I have to agree with John. I would suggest building
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:04:06 -0400 Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Thanks for all the ideas. I was hoping for something a little more TSO
:oriented where the end user would only see the count of the file. By doing
:strictly batch they would need to know JCL and where to look for the
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:21:07 -0500, Laine, Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We just migrated from 1.4 to 1.7 on our production lpar about 1.5 weeks
ago.
The first shutdown on 1.7 caused JES2 not to come down clean, thus
forcing an ABEND to end it.
Our second shutdown did the same thing.
All of
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:44:20 -0300, in bit.listserv.ibm-main_dummy
Clark Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24 Apr 2007 04:42:48 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Knutson, Sam)
wrote:
I have never IPLed SAD off anything but disk. For the other things you
can IPL from a tape unit like FDR, DFDSS, ZZSA
On Thursday 26 April 2007 12:07, Jon Renton wrote:
Hello,
we are experimenting with getting control of all ADRDSSU calls (the IBM DSS
user interface). To achieve this, we are thinking about renaming ADRDSSU
and supplying our own ADRDSSU frontend which will later call the real IBM
module.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:07:02 +0200, Jon Renton wrote:
Hello,
we are experimenting with getting control of all ADRDSSU calls (the IBM DSS
user interface). To achieve this, we are thinking about renaming ADRDSSU
and
supplying our own ADRDSSU frontend which will later call the real IBM
module.
You can control what functions are usable/available via RACF/TSS
profiles. That would be much cleaner than writing some front-end. I
worked at a company that did this, and even built-in some additional
function to build the control cards automatically for certain
functions. Problem was that it
In your shutdown process issues f omvs,shutdown
snip
We just migrated from 1.4 to 1.7 on our production lpar about 1.5 weeks
ago.
The first shutdown on 1.7 caused JES2 not to come down clean, thus
forcing an ABEND to end it.
Our second shutdown did the same thing.
All of our NJE line printer
We can protect the secret name using RACF. Using the rename method, we do
not need to change the original IBM module in case of an
error/emergency/etc. We can still use ADRDSSU directly.
The main aspect is - do any other z/OS subsystems (eg HSM) call the ADRDSSU
interface directly or does IBM use
IBM 3350A2/B2 modules on IBM 3830 Controller? Not sure about IBM 3375, I
was told we had them and most IBM DASD at that time, 1979 or so, at NVIP
but I was not aware of all we had back then. I think the IBM 3380 had 4
internal path selection.
Mark H. Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM
On 4/26/2007 1:45 PM, Jon Renton wrote:
We can protect the secret name using RACF. Using the rename method, we do
not need to change the original IBM module in case of an
error/emergency/etc. We can still use ADRDSSU directly.
I don't understand how you will protect the secret name using RACF.
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rick Fochtman) writes:
That increased instruction set allows for vastly increased capability,
in spite of the perceived complexity. Simple
Surely you're not serious! Is getting control an intent to prevent some
users from using ADRDSSU?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jon Renton
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 11:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Renaming
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:13:37 -0300, in bit.listserv.ibm-main Clark
Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Apr 2007 08:45:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Jaffe)
wrote:
Clark Morris wrote:
The frustrating thing is that there is no compiler switch to tell most
of the compilers that these
We want to gather information and modify the calls to ADRDSSU.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Anthony Saul Babonas
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. April 2007 20:06
An: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Betreff: Re: Renaming ADRDSSU
3880-xx Controller series followed by the 3990-xxx series
DASD was 3380-D, 3380-E, 3380-J, 3380-K, 3390-1, 3390-2, 3390-3 (today's
major image) and 3390-9 (a true SLED pulled by crippled and maimed dogs)
Yes, the 3380s had four paths. Do not recall if it was ever increased.
Bob Richards
- Original Message -
From: Jon Renton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:07 PM
Subject: Renaming ADRDSSU
Hello,
we are experimenting with getting control of all ADRDSSU calls (the IBM
DSS
user interface). To achieve this, we are
I usually do that with icetool
Walter Trovijo Jr.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Any STCs started without SUB=MSTR will need to be shutdown prior to JES2 being
shutdown.
Mark's suggestions are the way to go. JES2 being abended is not as big a deal
as it was in the olden days. And I think I read that JES2 in z/OS V1.8 should
be stating what tasks are holding up the JES2
We want to use the DFDSS user exit. In order to so the ADRDSSU call must be
changed! Otherwise the user exit will not run.
Jon
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von Pinnacle
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. April 2007 20:41
An:
Take a look at User Interaction Module (UIM) of ADRDSSU.
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
Banco Bradesco S/A
4254/DPCD Alphaville
Engenharia de Software - Sistemas Operacionais Mainframes
Tel: 55 11 4197-2021 Fax: 55 11 4197-2814
-Mensagem
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richards.Bob) writes:
3880-xx Controller series followed by the 3990-xxx series
DASD was 3380-D, 3380-E, 3380-J, 3380-K, 3390-1, 3390-2,
Thank you. I will have a look at it to see if it will help me solve the
problem.
Jon
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
von ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. April 2007 21:16
An: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:42:49 -0600, Anne Lynn Wheeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bit off topic: I find your input to these threads in general to be
quite useful. They appear to take a fair amount of work - are they
part of your jobs, or is this just a style you are comfortable with?
Thanks for sharing the info on this Bruce:
snip
Remember that it is true that a SYSDSN ENQ is held until the end of last
step that references the dataset. this is also true for GDG bases. My
test showed that this is true, both ENQs were released at the end of the
first step. But if you have
Another thing to look at is any outstanding replies. Issuing a p zfs
results in a WTOR, that until it is satisified will hang out there and
prevent JES2 from coming down clean.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original
In a recent note, McKown, John said:
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:30:30 -0500
I even did this with some files that resided on UNIX. You use pax to
create an archive, and direct it out to a z/OS legacy dataset with
LRECL=1,RECFM=FB,BLKSIZE=?. Then XMIT the pax archive and put it in the
In my PMR with IBM I asked if there was a known bug that caused this,
and the answer was:
The files can get cataloged incorrectly through a number of
different ways that is not dependent on IBM code
Sorry, I have been out of the office for a few days.
Yes, a FDRDSF restore or FDRCOPY copy
I just got:
IEW2766S D216 DDNAME SYSLIN IDENTIFIES AN HFS FILE
AS PART OF A DATA SET CONCATENATION. THIS IS NOT SUPPORTED.
So, now I must RTFM Using Data Sets to find the section that
states that JCL concatenation of HFS files _is_ supported,
since OS/390? Earlier? So I can start YA PMR.
Jon Renton wrote:
We want to use the DFDSS user exit. In order to so the ADRDSSU call must be
changed! Otherwise the user exit will not run.
snip
Why won't the exit run? The book sez:
8.5 Options Installation Exit Routine (ADRUIXIT)
The options installation exits routine can control
Thank you.
In the meantime could you please advise how CEEOCB flags the difference
between a value of NONE and an actual value - I presume that it is in
flags rather than in the actual data?
regards,
Anthony Fletcher - MNZCS
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A bit off topic: I find your input to these threads in general to be
quite useful. They appear to take a fair amount
Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A bit off topic: I find your input to these threads in general to be
quite useful. They
DASD was 3380-D, 3380-E, 3380-J, 3380-K, 3390-1, 3390-2, 3390-3 (today's major
image) and 3390-9 (a true SLED pulled by crippled and maimed dogs)
You forgot the old 3380-1 (the original).
It had four on a stick and you could have internal path contention.
Yes, the 3380s had four paths. Do not
did not realize that referencing the new GDG entry in a subsequent step would
retain the original ENQ EXCLUSIVE.
You'll find ENQ's promoted, but never demoted.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007i.html#33 Internal DASD Pathing
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007i.html#34 Internal DASD Pathing
minor addenda ... to previous
In a recent note, Robert A. Rosenberg said:
Subject: Re: sysdsn enq
Unfortunately due to a poor design in the ENQ support code it can be
forced to hold the ENQ longer than should be needed. The situation I
am talking about is when step 1 has an exclusive ENQ (DISP=OLD) while
step 2
Hi Tom,
What is MVCOS? (Where did you hear about it?)
Scott
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Scott Blackledge wrote:
What is MVCOS? (Where did you hear about it?)
http://shareew.prod.web.sba.com/client_files/callpapers/attach/SHARE_in_Tampa_Bay/S8162JE123550.pdf
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400
Gil's #1 point caused me issues for transmission of object files to VSE,
although with '/*'.
That's why I'd love a DLM option in z/VSE or something similar.
Later,
Ray
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent:
Hello: It seems that there are two ways to read the F1 DSCB of a data set
on a volume. What are the advantages/disadvantages of these two methods?
Thank you.
Paul Schuster
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
In a recent note, Ted MacNEIL said:
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:47:35 +
I don't thinks that's accurate.
DSN allocation is not cleared until EOJ.
Hence the scramble with GDG's in a job, especially if you create more than
one in
the same one.
I don't understand this allocation
And that poor design forced even worse design decisions on later developers
Paul, is there anything you like about z/OS?
UNIX has its warts too!
I remember when MicroSoft created the MS/Office bundle.
Macros that worked in the stand-alone releases of WORD XL stopped working,
and Micky-Soft
It is disturbing that the MVCOS instruction is not described in the latest
POP.
John P Baker
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
In a recent note, Hal Merritt said:
Subject: Re: Best practices for software delivery
Internet or a CD/DVD in zipped TSO XMIT format.
Think marketing; think marketing. Preload it on an iPod.
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:37:29 +1000, Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 04:15 -0500, R.S. wrote:
The message regards tape device.
How to find out what system holds the device ?
(except from checking it on every system console)
And to (partially) answer the question ...
When
In a recent note, Ted MacNEIL said:
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:10:00 +
And that poor design forced even worse design decisions on later developers
(just running with Mr. Rosenberg's idea.)
Paul, is there anything you like about z/OS?
Compared to CMS, several things.
UNIX
John P Baker wrote:
It is disturbing that the MVCOS instruction is not described in the latest
POP.
And, quite surprising.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Edward Jaffe wrote:
John P Baker wrote:
It is disturbing that the MVCOS instruction is not described in the
latest
POP.
And, quite surprising.
Not really--CSP didn't make it into the POP until some time after the Linux
developers had been using it.
Bob
Bob Rutledge wrote:
Edward Jaffe wrote:
John P Baker wrote:
It is disturbing that the MVCOS instruction is not described in the
latest
POP.
And, quite surprising.
Not really--CSP didn't make it into the POP until some time after the
Linux developers had been using it.
MVCOS has been
Paul Schuster wrote:
Hello: It seems that there are two ways to read the F1 DSCB of a data set
on a volume. What are the advantages/disadvantages of these two methods?
If you ever want to run your code in MVT or MVS on a Hercules
system, OBTAIN will work there too. CVAFDIR has a better
Rogers wrote on 27/04/2007 02:21:07 AM:
We just migrated from 1.4 to 1.7 on our production lpar about 1.5 weeks
ago.
The first shutdown on 1.7 caused JES2 not to come down clean, thus
forcing an ABEND to end it.
Our second shutdown did the same thing.
All of our NJE line printer are
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 04/26/2007
07:39:42 PM:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:37:29 +1000, Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 04:15 -0500, R.S. wrote:
The message regards tape device.
How to find out what system holds the device ?
Well, if it's RECFM=FB and RLSE or DFHSM spacemanagement, it's just a
calculation.
But, your underlying question. Your production work is using SMS
volumes and SDB? Isn't it? Then your question is almost moot, as in why
do you care?
Batch slowdowns are likely due to something else.
We have a utility called SyzCmdz that handles our shutdown (and IPL)
automation. Part of that shutdown uses a special utility that goes out to
USS and takes things down on that end nicely.
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Absolutely agreed on the CA thing. And they insist it be a tape. I
don't know what we'll be doing in a couple years if we achieve the
desired tapeless environment.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday,
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
