PROFS is still around, although the new name (and new version) is now
OfficeVision. You can get more details on OfficeVision/MVS here:
http://www.ibm.com/software/applications/office/officevision/index.html
Yes, it's available for ordering. The IBM product number is 5685-106.
Re: Faxing, I think
Mary,
>IXC431I GROUP RIOXCF44 MEMBER MHSE JOB RIODSA01 ASID 004E 236
>STALLED AT 04/03/2008 12:46:08.172851 ID: 1.1
...
>Can anyone give me some information on this? I'm at a loss since I don't
>see an RIO** job or STC, etc.
Do a D XCF,grp,rioxcf44,all. What you *should* see is only STCs at an ex
RON,
If the HDS box is configure and have definition for 3390 without running
ickdsf, is it posible that I from PC will create 3390 disk with the data
which is created in the PC hard disk?
Sorry that it seem that I claim that I have the only features of SRDF,
Emulates 3390 etc..and nobody have
John,
>They will NEVER be changed once they are used for an IPL. Instead, I will
>change the IEASYSnn member to point to a new GRSRNLnn member that has
>never been used before. But the question remains as to why I cannot more
>easily recover from this sort of user error?
I don't think using ano
> Does anyone know what causes a SYSTEM STALLED message? We have a
> multi-system sysplex, 2 LPARS, no CF.
The messages manual offers several possibilities for IXC431I
> I am unfamiliar with checking the utilization of the XCF
> Communications paths. Is there a command I issue or is there anot
Someone already pointed out a solution is to share a PARMLIB and a
common RNL specification. I have to side with IBM's choice on this one.
It is much better to have a system dead with a clear indication of what
you messed up than for it to be alive but perhaps confused having made
dangerous assump
Shai
I'm trying not be HDS only in my reply. Your claim of " Nobody in MF market"
is a pretty hard pill to swallow - in fact I choked!
Just for the record:
>
> Nobody in MF market have the MFNetDisk features.
>
> The features are:
>
> 1. Emulate 3390 with data in PC the same as IBM emulates
Shai,
Without knowing it you are the one that is setting up XP and Home-brand
desktops as the reference architecture for your product. Throughout this
thread for example, you consistently refer to XP as if it is your OS of
choice, and PC as the platform. You are postioning your product as a
workst
Shai,
Let me see if I have this right. You have been contacted by someone with
some model of HDS Disk array formatted for MF, but they don't have a MF to
connect it to. You want to read the data from the MF formatted volumes via
Fibre Channel.
If that's it, then I'm afraid you are out of like. Th
Radoslaw and Eric.
I did make it known when I changed to full time employee back in 2003. I felt
that I could no longer regard my posts as 100% untainted by my employment staus
at that point - but I try.
As for the software, HMDE = Rapid Exchange. It has changed names again and is
now called C
I have a program (there are several available) that sends an email with the
condition codes implemented as the last step of a job, and our scheduling
product (SyzAuto) automatically adds that step for every job that it runs.
One of the accounts that gets notified is a email task that accepts th
>http://www.rogerdmoore.ca/INF/EIPSPTTa.html
Wow, it's a small small world.
I used to attend lectures given by Ian Sharp, in the 1970's, at UWaterloo.
And, he was a Bridge partner of mine in thew mid-1980's.
Is he still around?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
---
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, McKown, John wrote:
> I admit to being uninterested in the product (nothing new about that
> with me, at times) and a bit bored with it as well.
>
Oh, just to mention. I am not saying that Shai should not post here. I'm
just remarking on this particular product/function.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 5:49 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Shai Hess and his product (was CA ESD files Options)
>
>
> I haven't tried very hard, but I s
On 03/04/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I was at Varian Associates, I wrote a PROFS-to-Telex interface. I
> wonder if anyone still uses PROFS (officially discontinued in favor of the
> great-in-theory-but-wretched-in-practice Lotus Notes)? Or even Telexes?
> At the t
>Because you're not in a Sysplex doing rolling IPLs?
That doesn't work if the RNL is different/wrong on any system.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send emai
I haven't tried very hard, but I see no need for this product.
And, I'm sick of hearing about it.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTEC
>Ran into that problem several months ago. I had
system "A" up on a good RNL. IPLed system "B" with one that didn't match and
BOOM! Wait state on system
"B".
I have always hated this limitation.
As far as I'm concerned, the first system IPL'd should read the RNL.
The rest should query as they co
When I was at Varian Associates, I wrote a PROFS-to-Telex interface. I
wonder if anyone still uses PROFS (officially discontinued in favor of the
great-in-theory-but-wretched-in-practice Lotus Notes)? Or even Telexes?
At the time, there was a legal requirement that Telexes met but email did
n
Brad,
When I was working at P&H Mining, when they still had a mainframe, they did
faxing through CICS, a special PC that came with the product, and a Unix
application that ran on the mainframe. This was the only Unix system we had on
the mainframe. The only problem is - I can't remember the n
Brad Wissink wrote:
We currently are using PSF download to send purchase orders to InfoPrint/AIX
V4.1 and then faxing from there to the vendor. We have learned that fax
support will no longer be included in InfoPrint on any platform. So I was just
curious as to how other shops are dealing wit
Security Center does have sysplex support
using the coupling facility
but that's been pretty reliable,
it might be the victim.
The product has mulitple address spaces.
Did you give Vanguard a call?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / sig
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:14 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Another RNL question
>
>
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:44:53 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
>
> >> --
You might be surprised just how many fax solutions are just because
that's the way it's always been done and the recipient would -much-
rather have email.
To answer your question, we email. Be aware we have had problems when an
individual goes on vacation and the mailbox fills up.
-Original
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 14:50 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
> If you must fax, then email to a fax server inside your own
> organization. I figure that I could put up a Linux/Intel system to do
> this in a couple of days.
This is a bigger job than you might think. Your customers have a wide
variety of
We have 2 engines, no ICF or CF, and 2 LPARS in a SYSPLEX that share both
engines. I am unfamiliar with checking the utilization of the XCF
Communications paths. Is there a command I issue or is there another utility
I can use to check them?
Thanks,
Mary
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mai
The messages indicate delay's in XCF processing.
Are you by any chance running an ICF on a shared engine?
If you are not running a ICF or a CF, check the utilization of your XCF
Communications paths.
HTH,
Does anyone know what causes a SYSTEM STALLED message? We have a
multi-system sysplex, 2
Yes, we do. I've narrowed it down to possibly an XCF problem with Riovision.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dave Kopischke
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 4:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: system stalled message
On
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:53:58 -0500, Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM wrote:
>Can anyone give me some information on this? I'm at a loss since I don't see
>an RIO** job or STC, etc.
Do you have Vanguard Security products ??? I've seen RIO* messages in
association with the RIOVision tasks. Not sure if t
Well done, Greg. You said what I was thinking far better than I did.
Shai, it's not a matter of 1 or 2 of us not liking your product, the point is
that your ignorance of our experiences and attitudes have most likely excluded
you from the VAST majority of the mainframe sites represented on thi
Hi Everyone,
Does anyone know what causes a SYSTEM STALLED message? We have a
multi-system sysplex, 2 LPARS, no CF.
Here is the message,
IXC431I GROUP RIOXCF44 MEMBER MHSE JOB RIODSA01 ASID 004E 236
STALLED AT 04/03/2008 12:46:08.172851 ID: 1.1
LAST MSGX: 04/03/2008 12:43:10.885316 17 S
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
04/02/2008
at 09:53 PM, shai hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> You can have a problem with XP/Linux if you surfing the Internet
>looking for unreliable sites (XXX site, maybe for the guy who reboot the
>PC after 2 hours :)), or if you open email from non authorize pe
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/02/2008
at 04:35 AM, Sascha Weng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I have a programm written in Cobol which runs monthly on a z/Os-System.
>The programm reads inputrecords and writes them in a database (DB2) and
>in different outputfiles. It consumes nearly the same num
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
04/02/2008
at 11:18 PM, shai hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> MF is a close system, and there are no millions of genius evil people
>who try to hack the MF.
XP is also a closed system.
>because MF does not have antivirus software.
It has AV software, but only needs
Thanks everyone. I'll check these out.
Mary :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dave Thorn
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 2:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Workload Manager
Another good one would be Barry Merrill'
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
04/01/2008
at 10:38 PM, shai hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>So in general you can have very cheap storage (HARD DISK) which can
>emulate any 3390 size disk (all models and all size, even 100 cylinders
>is OK ) which can replace any tapes
No. One aspect of real tapes
Not that I had any real interest but your ignorance in the mainframe
architecture would certainly eliminate any intention I could ever have of
running your product. If you knew more about the design and what protects the
mainframe you would know why most (if not all) hacks wouldn't work in a
p
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:31:34 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
>
> But the question
>remains as to why I cannot more easily recover from this sort of user
>error?
Because you're not in a Sysplex doing rolling IPLs?
--
Tom Marchant
Actually, with the proper investment in application/planning, it *IS*
zero down time.
But it is not ZERO down time.
It is simply LESS downtime. In our shop, to simply recycle a CICS region
(down then up) takes a minimum of about 10 minutes (no, I've not done a
stop watch on this)
Of course, th
I will be out of the office starting 04/03/2008 and will not return until
04/08/2008.
If this is a customer emergency please call my cell phone.
520-977-7196. For non-emergency DFSORT related issues please contact Vicky
Vezinaw.
---
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:44:53 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:21:19 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>> >
>> >Just another "I hate sysplex" message from me.
On 3 Apr 2008 12:50:45 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown,
John) wrote:
>We don't do this, but I'd look at using email. If you must fax, then
>email to a fax server inside your own organization. I figure that I
>could put up a Linux/Intel system to do this in a couple of days.
That's our solution a
>> John McKown wrote:
>> > Can anybody tell me the logic
>> > at IPL time to force the IPL'ing system into a wait state
>> if the new
>> > system's RNL does not match the RNL of the sysplex?
>>
Ran into that problem several months ago. I had system "A" up on a good RNL.
IPLed system "B" with one th
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:47:59 -0700, Edward Jaffe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark Zelden wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:27:11 -0400, Craddock, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes the job can run anywhere that has an available initiator for the job
>>> class. However as a practical matte
Ed said;
> ROTFLMAO! This JES2 job scheduling design flaw has been around since
> before I started programming for a living!
Aw geez Ed, don't sit on the fence. Tell us what you really think :-)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signof
In a message dated 4/3/2008 1:32:47 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SLA is.
>>
Sorry, old T-rex performance term for Service Level Agreement. What your
users want and what they can live with. Corporately how to allocate resources
to
get your business done within b
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Stitt
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 2:43 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Another RNL question
>
>
> I've learned to update the one used at IPL time. Then make
> t
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Wissink
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 2:41 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Faxing from the mainframe
>
>
> We currently are using PSF download to send purchase orders
> t
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:27:11 -0400, Craddock, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Yes the job can run anywhere that has an available initiator for the job
class. However as a practical matter (at least with JES2) the job almost
always runs on the same system where it is submitt
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 11:17 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Another RNL question
>
>
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:21:19 -0500, John McKown wrote:
> >
> >Jus
I've learned to update the one used at IPL time. Then make the change
dynamically specifying that member to be used. That way things "SHOULD" be
the same upon the next IPL of one of the systems.
The biggest problem I run into are enqueues that will not release, thus
holding up the dynamic RNL ch
We currently are using PSF download to send purchase orders to InfoPrint/AIX
V4.1 and then faxing from there to the vendor. We have learned that fax
support will no longer be included in InfoPrint on any platform. So I was just
curious as to how other shops are dealing with faxing from the mai
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 10:09 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Another RNL question
>
>
> John McKown wrote:
> > Can anybody tell me the logic
> > at IPL
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Lyon
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 10:09 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Another RNL question
>
>
>
>
> >I agree with that. What I was saying is that this is the
Sorry, I should have looked before I typed. It is on the INTRDR
statement:
$HASP838 INTRDR AUTH=(DEVICE=NO,JOB=YES,SYSTEM=YES),BATCH=YES,
$HASP838 CLASS=A,HOLD=NO,HONORLIM=NO,PRTYINC=0,
$HASP838 PRTYLIM=15,SYSAFF=(LPR3),TRACE=NO
Z/os 1.7.
When the se
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eatherly, John D [EQ]
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 9:43 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Another RNL question
>
>
> We have a parmlib that is shared by the whole sysplex.
Another good one would be Barry Merrill's listservwhile it's
generally oriented toward his MXG product there are often performance
discussions there as well. See www.mxg.com And system performance is
one of the main areas of interest at CMG...if you can get out of the
office.
Dave Thorn * S
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:59:13 -0500, Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi Everyone,
>Does anyone know of a Workload Manager users group or listserver?
>Thanks,
>Mary Yukus
IBM-MAIN. :-)
Actually there is a WLM group on news.software.ibm.com, but the last time
I checked (over
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:27:11 -0400, Craddock, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> If you do not use a SYSAFF card thereby taking the default of
>SYSAFF=ANY
>> will a job run only on the LPAR that it is submitted from? Can it ever
>run
>> on an LPAR other than the one submitted without a SYSAFF card
You are here. This is it.
Although Al Sherkow runs a list for capacity/billing concerns/performance
concerns. I don't follow that one as I find it above my head, too
management oriented for me.
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:59:13 -0500, Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi Everyon
Oh? What level of JES2 allows for a SYSAFF setting on the JOBCLASS ?
INTRDR has a SYSAFF. JOBCLASS has a QAFF (at least on z/OS 1.8 JES2).
But I'm not recalling any vaguely current JES2 with SYSAFF on JOBCLASS...
-
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:44:49 -0500, Hal Merritt wrote:
>Well, actually, ther
Snipped
(I'm sure you know..)
ICF is not required for a sysplex. Only for a parallel sysplex. You can
still achieve high availability with a basic sysplex. Just not the
highest
availability.
End Snipped
Still beats a chickenplex - hundreds of servers tied together with IP.
Daniel McLau
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:12:25 +0200, R.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Tom Marchant wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:21:19 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>>> Just another "I hate sysplex" message from me. No, don't bother to justify
>>> it. At my shop, it is not justifiable as far as I am concerned (only o
Hi Everyone,
Does anyone know of a Workload Manager users group or listserver?
Thanks,
Mary Yukus
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN IN
Well, actually, there is no default. The action taken depends on the
SYSAFF setting for the job class. And I'm too lazy to look up -that-
default :-)
Our scheduler runs on a 'penalty box' (an LPAR capped to save on
software costs) and submits jobs there as do our TSO users. However, all
jobs witho
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:20:47 EDT, Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>In a message dated 4/1/2008 10:07:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>Ed Gould must be on vacation. So, I'm posting this instead. ;-)
>
>>>
>Haven't heard from him since prior to SHARE-maybe he's sh
Weird situation...don't seem to have any. Our mainframe is the report
generator and most of this is quick ad hoc stuff. No one is hollering, so
we must be meeting whatever the SLA is.
Daniel McLaughlin
Z-Series Systems Programmer
Information & Communications Technology
Crawford & Company
46
> If you do not use a SYSAFF card thereby taking the default of
SYSAFF=ANY
> will a job run only on the LPAR that it is submitted from? Can it ever
run
> on an LPAR other than the one submitted without a SYSAFF card?
Yes the job can run anywhere that has an available initiator for the job
class. H
In a message dated 4/3/2008 12:55:59 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Monthend/quarter end here. SDSF shows input queue currently at 9,818 with
a high of 9925 shortly before that.
>>
How are you doing with SLA's???
**Planning your summer road trip?
Monthend/quarter end here. SDSF shows input queue currently at 9,818 with
a high of 9925 shortly before that.
I'll keep my dinosaur, someone else can feed the chickens.
Daniel McLaughlin
Z-Series Systems Programmer
Information & Communications Technology
Crawford & Company
4680 N. Royal Atl
If I LMCOPY/REPLACE a number of members into a PDSE, one copy command
per member, when is space occupied by the replaced members available
for reuse?
o At the end of LMCOPY command?
o When I LMFREE the LIBDEF?
o When I free the DDNAME?
o Other (specify)?
What's the tradeoff between electively
Or use S99 COMP-5. COMP-5 Truncates by Binary Integer Rules instead of
Cobol Picture Rules.
Darren
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Poil
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Opti
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
Radoslaw,
I don't know if you are aware of it or not, but Ron Hawkins works for Hitachi.
When he writes something about DASD, especially HDS DASD, I take it as fact. I
just looked at a past posting of Ron's from today, and I didn't see any mention
of the fact that he w
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:21:19 -0500, John McKown wrote:
Just another "I hate sysplex" message from me. No, don't bother to justify
it. At my shop, it is not justifiable as far as I am concerned (only one
box).
Sysplex *is* justifiable on one box.
With a good sysplex design,
Thank you, all!
Timothy, I am impressed, almost everything you said in your introduction is
true.
I am still ‘digesting’ your options (didn’t have much time, had some problems
with JES2). Just wanted to thank you for such an elaborate answer.
I am considering options 1b and 2b, although we neve
Radoslaw,
I don't know if you are aware of it or not, but Ron Hawkins works for Hitachi.
When he writes something about DASD, especially HDS DASD, I take it as fact. I
just looked at a past posting of Ron's from today, and I didn't see any mention
of the fact that he works for Hitachi, so you
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:21:19 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>
>Just another "I hate sysplex" message from me. No, don't bother to justify
>it. At my shop, it is not justifiable as far as I am concerned (only one
>box).
Sysplex *is* justifiable on one box.
With a good sysplex design, you can shift all p
I got an answer back from IBM development today on it, and they're in
essence saying the same thing, albeit more generically. The answer I
got was
"Rex...According to development:
All data sets can potentially display SMS data now therefore the change.
Apart from the SMS data, information shoul
Shai, you seem to spend a lot of time pomoting your own product, either
openly or subtly. Methinks you may already been contacted by those that
are interested or want further information. Hint?
You right, PC is not a good name, better to say that my produ
Yes, the default is SYSAFF=ANY, which will allow the job to run in any system
in the MAS. There is a command which can be executed at JES2 initialization
(from the init parms), that will set the INTRDR default to *, which will
effectivly change the default so that jobs will run only on the syst
A job can run on any LPAR that has a job class matching the one on the
job card. This is the simple answer; where a job runs can be managed
with WLM and other things such as automation.
Dave Thorn * Senior Technology Analyst * SunGard Computer Services * 600
Laurel Oak Road, Voorhees, NJ, 08043
O
Bill Johnson wrote:
> If you do not use a SYSAFF card thereby taking the default of SYSAFF=ANY will
> a job run only on the LPAR that it is submitted from? Can it ever run on an
> LPAR other than the one submitted without a SYSAFF card?
>
> TIA
>
> Bill Johnson
>
>
It depends. Wit
If you do not use a SYSAFF card thereby taking the default of SYSAFF=ANY will a
job run only on the LPAR that it is submitted from? Can it ever run on an LPAR
other than the one submitted without a SYSAFF card?
TIA
Bill Johnson
-
You rock. That
Ron Hawkins wrote:
Shai,
Just to get things right, there is no such thing as a 3390 ot 3990
controller. There are Disk arrays that can have CKD volumes connected by
FICON or ESCON, or FBA LUNs connected through Fibre Channel or iSCSI. There
is also a plethora of storage that is FBA Fibre Channel
John McKown wrote:
Can anybody tell me the logic
at IPL time to force the IPL'ing system into a wait state if the new
system's RNL does not match the RNL of the sysplex?
I'm pretty sure it just issues the LPSW instruction. ;-)
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Centu
>I agree with that. What I was saying is that this is the way we avoid the
issues all together. We had some finger checks early on when we were
started doing sysplex and decided to have a shared parmlib to avoid it. This
library has grown some to have other members that are shared. We have
> > There is a BIG difference between a PC and an x86 server class
> machine. You seem to be unaware of the knowledge and attitude of your
> audience. Your recent >comments have made me reconsider the minor interest
> I had in your product. I don't think I would touch it now with a ten foot
> po
John McKown wrote:
On z/OS 1.8, if that makes any difference. Can anybody tell me the logic
at IPL time to force the IPL'ing system into a wait state if the new
system's RNL does not match the RNL of the sysplex? Now, I understand why
all systems in a sysplex need the same RNL. But I am curious
I agree with that. What I was saying is that this is the way we avoid the
issues all together. We had some finger checks early on when we were started
doing sysplex and decided to have a shared parmlib to avoid it. This library
has grown some to have other members that are shared. We have 6
John,
On a production sysplex, surely the wait state is the only sensible thing to do?
At that stage in system creation, GRS is expected to be active and it has found
that to carry on would compromise the integrity of the resources - it must fall
in its sword to protect your data and other syst
There is a BIG difference between a PC and an x86 server class machine. You
seem to be unaware of the knowledge and attitude of your audience. Your recent
comments have made me reconsider the minor interest I had in your product. I
don't think I would touch it now with a ten foot pole.
>>> s
We have a parmlib that is shared by the whole sysplex. And the GRSRNL is one
of the members that is in that library. That way, they are always the same.
You don't have to duplicate members.
Thanks
John Eatherly
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PR
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (shai hess) writes:
> Buffer overflow is a programming error. if you use some C command (reading
> strings command etc...) you can have a problem.
On z/OS 1.8, if that makes any difference. Can anybody tell me the logic
at IPL time to force the IPL'ing system into a wait state if the new
system's RNL does not match the RNL of the sysplex? Now, I understand why
all systems in a sysplex need the same RNL. But I am curious as to why I
am not
RON,
Linux is also IBM MF with Linux :).
Thanks,
Shai
On 4/3/08, shai hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> RON,
>
> When I talking about PC I mean PC, PC is not only XP but also Linux.
>
> As I mention before, My product can run in Linux using a software which
> enable the dot net to run i
RON,
When I talking about PC I mean PC, PC is not only XP but also Linux.
As I mention before, My product can run in Linux using a software which
enable the dot net to run in Linux.
Thanks,
Shai
On 4/3/08, Ron Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Shai,
>
> If you are talking medium an
RON,
I need to access the data of the 3390 disk inside the box. There must be
something that will enable it. The CKD is not standard in non FICON
interface.
I heard that there is API which enable server to access the 3390 data.
Maybe a driver is needed in the PC.
Can you give me more informat
Shai,
If you are talking medium and enterprise companies, then I disagree
completely with the fact that "millions of companies" use the PC for
production. Millions of companies use W2003, LINUX or the UNIXen for
production, but they do not use XP and they do not run on a PC using the
latest gamer'
Does anyone have an MPF exit that parses a message for some variable info
and then issues a command to MVS that they would be willing to share. I
want to automatically start programs/transactions that have been stopped
because they have been abended. There is a sample IMS exit to do this but I
wo
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 01:01:52 -0500, Victor Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi all,
>I noticed that some version of smp/e like in os/290 2.10 or z/os 1.5, when
>applying ptf, smp/e will complain that some ptf are missing, in fact those
>ptfs are superceded. One method I know is to download those p
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
