Clifford,
658 reads: Initializing the TCP connection for Telnet3270 (3270 session).
Initializing the TCP connection for Telnet5250 (5250 session).
is it connected to your network/intranet? can/did you have remote access to
the HMC and is it working?
We don't have the OS/2 HMC's anymore and use
(My sentmail shows I sent this reply last Tuesday, but since
the archives don't have it, I guess that explains why I got
no response. Here it is again)
Thank you Alan for the information, but it is still not totally clear to me
what is happening.
It vaguely occurred to me that perhaps
IBM is expanding the authorized use of an IBM® System z® Integrated Facility
for Linux®
feature (IFL). As of November 18, 2008, an IFL may be used for execution of the
OpenSolaris operating system in addition to or instead of the Linux operating
system,
respective OpenSolaris or Linux
Thanks very much, Allan.
Suleiman Shahin
Send
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:27:29 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Number os SSL connections
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Yes, you would need that APAR. You could contact the support center, but =
as far as I know the limit
On Monday, 11/17/2008 at 07:09 EST, Mike Hammock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A zVM 5.3 user (not even one of our customers) is trying to use a 3590
to
migrate from their current ( about to expire) FLEX-ES system to a system
z
and is having problems.
From zVM he can (apparently) write to the
Thanks Alan, we can certainly give that a try.. But... I assumed (there is
that problem word) that if we mounted the tape cartridge, did a TAPE REW
then a TAPE DUMP * * A that it would wipe out any standard label on the
cartridge... that it would become a no-label tape no matter what it was
On Tuesday, 11/18/2008 at 08:54 EST, Mike Hammock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks Alan, we can certainly give that a try.. But... I assumed (there
is
that problem word) that if we mounted the tape cartridge, did a TAPE
REW
then a TAPE DUMP * * A that it would wipe out any standard label on
Mike, would it be possibe to network connect the two systems, and avoid using
tape at all?
Mike Hammock wrote:
Thanks Alan, we can certainly give that a try.. But... I assumed (there is
that problem word) that if we mounted the tape cartridge, did a TAPE REW
then a TAPE DUMP * * A that it
Normally yes, but... Their FLEX system will die tomorrow (or perhaps
the next day) but they are not getting a replacement System z for another
month or so. (Yes, they will be out of action for a while lonnngg
story...). So, by the time the z10 comes in, the FLEX system will be dead
and
GM, Listers,l
I defined DRCT area on one of CP owned pack, How do I make this alternate
DRCT avaialble ?
Do I need to IPL or Is there way to dynamically make new DRCT area active
?
Thanks for you info in advance,
Ann
On Tuesday, 11/18/2008 at 04:45 EST, Shimon Lebowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thank you Alan for the information, but it is still not totally clear to
me
what is happening.
It vaguely occurred to me that perhaps somehow SIE was doing it all
now (as I wrote bypass the simulation) at least
Yes, I had suggested that to the customer and it would be possible. It
would require some work (HCD/IODF, etc.) to make the volumes
available/known to the zOS system and then to set up and run the DFDss dump
jobs. They are trying to avoid this extra effort since they already have
the DDR
Note: you need a write link to a FULLPACK minidisk that covers the DRCT
area.
2008/11/18 Rich Greenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On: Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 09:40:01AM -0500,Aisik Chang Wrote:
} I defined DRCT area on one of CP owned pack, How do I make this alternate
} DRCT avaialble ?
} Do I need
And, as z/OS can use the tapes, what about using an MVS utility to take a
physical backup of the z/VM disks.
2008/11/18 Mike Hammock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Normally yes, but... Their FLEX system will die tomorrow (or perhaps
the next day) but they are not getting a replacement System z for
On: Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 09:51:55AM -0500,Rich Greenberg Wrote:
} On: Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 09:40:01AM -0500,Aisik Chang Wrote:
}
} } I defined DRCT area on one of CP owned pack, How do I make this alternate
} } DRCT avaialble ?
} } Do I need to IPL or Is there way to dynamically make new DRCT
With 5.2, CMS (not xedit) anything entered in CMS converted to uppercase when
the enter key was pressed. With 5.4, the characters no longer convert to
uppercase.
Can this be changed via a command to CP or CMS?
Ray Waters
NOTICE:
This e-mail is intended
On: Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 09:40:01AM -0500,Aisik Chang Wrote:
} I defined DRCT area on one of CP owned pack, How do I make this alternate
} DRCT avaialble ?
} Do I need to IPL or Is there way to dynamically make new DRCT area active
} ?
Just change the DIRECT statement in the source directory
Ray,
I'm confused. To my knowledge, nothing changed between 5.2 and 5.4 with
the way CMS commands are handled. Do you have an example?
Thanks!
Mike Donovan
Ray Waters
The Novell site can be very particular. I, too, use Mozilla / Firefox 3
successfully, but only when the Novell site deems me worthy.
David Dean
Information Systems
*bcbstauthorized*
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Mike,
I no longer have my 5.2 system up.
Our 5.4 after pressing enter:
q t
TIME IS 10:29:07 EST TUESDAY 11/18/08
CONNECT= 00:04:20 VIRTCPU= 000:00.01 TOTCPU= 000:00.02
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 10:29:07
In 5.2 it would be:
Q T
TIME IS 10:29:07 EST TUESDAY 11/18/08
CONNECT= 00:04:20 VIRTCPU= 000:00.01
I don't see this effect on 5.2.
LOGON AT 10:37:23 CDT TUESDAY 11/18/08
z/VM V5.2.02008-08-20 15:41
Ready; T=0.12/0.18 10:37:23
q t
TIME IS 10:37:26 CDT TUESDAY 11/18/08
CONNECT= 00:00:03 VIRTCPU= 000:00.26 TOTCPU= 000:00.60
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 10:37:26
Ray Waters wrote:
Mike,
I no
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What command is causing you a problem? Please post a snippet that
illustrates your problem.
I did notice that the logon command is echoed in mixed case by CP on
z/VM 5.3. It seems to have changed between z/VM 3.1 and z/VM
FYI -
My 5.2 and 5.4 2nd level are the same. The q t is NOT converted to
upper case. Nor are other commands like q alloc page or q xst.
At 10:31 AM 11/18/2008, Ray Waters wrote:
Mike,
I no longer have my 5.2 system up.
Our 5.4 after pressing enter:
q t
TIME IS 10:29:07 EST TUESDAY
This from 5.2
q t
TIME IS 11:46:12 EDT TUESDAY 11/18/08
CONNECT= 00:11:47 VIRTCPU= 000:00.03 TOTCPU= 000:00.05
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 11:46:12
q cplevel
z/VM Version 5 Release 2.0, service level 0601 (64-bit)
Generated at 08/02/06 11:10:50 EDT
IPL at 09/15/08 08:34:34 EDT
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 11:46:20
Nor on our z/VM 5.1 and z/VM 5.4 systems (note the lower-case cp q
cplevel):
---snip--
q cplevel
z/VM Version 5 Release 1.0, service level 0501 (64-bit)
Generated at 09/04/08 16:26:13 CST
IPL at 11/16/08 20:54:17 CST
cp q cplevel
z/VM Version 5 Release 4.0, service level 0801 (64-bit)
I don't yet have a 5.4 system, but here is a sample from a 2.3, 3.1, 4.4, 5.2,
and 5.3 system.
q cplevel
VM/ESA Version 2 Release 3.0, service level 0101
Generated at 03/11/02 16:44:14 EST
IPL at 08/17/03 03:40:50 EST
I run into the exact opposite problem.. ie when entering a pipe on the terminal
nothing gets translated to upper case, so one must remember that a 'FIND' or
'LOCATE' must be typed in upper case (assuming upper is what one is looking
for).
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating
On Tuesday, 11/18/2008 at 10:46 EST, Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What command is causing you a problem? Please post a snippet that
illustrates your problem.
I did notice that the logon command is
Isn't it to do with the SET LANG option? One of the options is UCAMENG or
something like that? This one is upper case only.
There is NO problem. Every thing works as before. I just noticed a difference
between our prior VM systems and 5.4.
Our prior systems would convert anything typed in CMS to upper case once the
enter key was pressed. Now with 5.4 the translation does not occur.
With 5.4:
q alloc = q alloc
q t =
Was your default language set to UCENG before?
(Q LANG)
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any
Alan, doesn't the setting of CP TERM MODE have an effect on commands?
In TERM MODE CP everything is uppercase.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 10:37 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Is there somebody having some experiences with that combination already?
Regards,
Wolfgang Buettner
Software AG - Sitz/Registered office: Uhlandstra?e 12, 64297 Darmstadt,
Germany, - Registergericht/Commercial register: Darmstadt HRB 1562 - Vorstand/
Management Board: Karl-Heinz Streibich
THANK YOU!! I was assuming that SIE was taking the REAL cpuid
of the hardware, but I just tested your suggestion that I
modify the virtual CPUID in the VMDBK, and it solves the
problem.
Thank you,
Shimon
Original message
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:04:41 -0500
From: Alan Altmark
The LANG does not make a difference:
q lang
AMENG
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 11:29:05
ind
AVGPROC-050% 03
XSTORE-00/SEC MIGRATE-/SEC
MDC READS-001384/SEC WRITES-74/SEC HIT RATIO-096%
PAGING-3/SEC STEAL-000%
Q0-4(0) DORMANT-00025
Q1-8(0)
What a mess! Very confusing. For clarification, Ray is asking (and
please confirm, Ray) about the ECHOING of certain commands. UCENG (or
other SET LANG) would apply to RESPONSES from commands. Vewy
diffewent.
In my experience, commands echoed by CMS are echoed as entered and
have been for a
Absolutely. For quite a few months now.
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must
not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any
information
Hello All,
Dang I miss working on VM.
Back in the good ol' days, I worked with Tom Wilson and Pete Jobusch on t
he
Purdue Batch System. I was wondering if someone still has this code, and
if
so, would they be willing to ship me a copy on CD or DVD (or place it on
an
FTP site?) Sorry, I
We have our z box on public addresses hence VM and all virtual Linux
servers are also. We have finally stared a push to move them onto 10
addresses. We have a layer 3 vswitch defined. The network group has given
me test ip addresses, subnet mask, and gateway addreses.
My problem is I can
For a guest LAN what is the device type used in the DEVICE statement for a
z/OS guest? MPCOSA or MPCIPA (or something else)?
My money's on Bill Scully's suggestion, below. Easily overlooked in the
stream of replies (and some replies seem to be coming out-of-order today).
We all get used to what we've been running for ages.
Perhaps Ray is running with a different PROFILE EXEC, or without common
change to SYSPROF EXEC
We moved a z/VM 5.3 703 system from a z/990 to a z/10. IPLed
successfully. When we attempted to IPL our TPF 4.1 guests, they would
go through rollcall and then take an HCP1455E CPU XX is not started
because it is in check-stop state. It turns out that the z/OS sysprog
who set up the LPAR had
On 11/17/2008 at 7:53 PM, Raymond Noal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
What do you recommend someone use to download files from the Novell site for
zSeries Linux files? I've tried MS Internet Explorer and Mozilla/FireFox and
neither of them works.
I try to use wget as much as possible,
This is not the case. I am in Term Mode VM.
Ray
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Walter
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 10:56 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 5.4.0 CMS commands are now mixed case
My
Doesn't it depend on which type of guest LAN you defined? I.e., TYPE
HIPERS or TYPE QDIO? The default is a hipersockets type. (I have no
z/OS experience!)
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Neale Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a guest LAN what is the device type used in the DEVICE
z/VM 5.3 will IPL in a z/VM mode LPAR on a z10, but it will only use
1 type of the CPUs. In my experience I had both CPs and IFLs defined
to the partition, but 5.3 would only use the CPs. It could see that
the IFLs were there, but they could not be varied online. What kind
of CPUs were defined
Ray Waters wrote:
This is not the case. I am in Term Mode VM.
How many lowercase EBCDIC characters can dance on the head of a pin?
--
Jack J. Woehr# Sen. Obama has achieved a great
http://www.well.com/~jax # thing for him and for his country.
http://www.softwoehr.com # - Sen.
Here's a straw to grasp at:
Local mod that allowed SCREEN INREDISP UPPER
??
Bob Bates
Enterprise Hosting Services
w. (469)892-6660
c. (214) 907-5071
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
Two CP's, no IFLs. The CMS virtual machines worked fine. It wasn't
until IPLing the TPF guests that we discovered the issue.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Hayden
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 12:48 PM
To:
Greetings,
In the light of the restriction of 128 concurrent secured sessions on a
system, can one (I) utilise more than one SSL server, and what mechanism can be
used to have one server or the other service the connection?
Thanks.
Suleiman Shahin
One SSLSERV per stack, but you can have multiple stacks each with their
own IP address. When I get maintenance for TCPIP, it goes on a TCPTEST
server with its own SSLTEST server, different IP address but I can get
to the same system.
/Tom Kern
Suleiman Shahin wrote:
Greetings,
In the light
Now I see light -:) Thanks.
Suleiman Shahin
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:13:31 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SSLSERV
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
One SSLSERV per stack, but you can have multiple stacks each with their
own IP address. When I get maintenance for TCPIP, it
I have the source and documentation for the LARS Purdue Batch Subsystem.
I got my first look at it when I worked with Pete and Carol Jobusch. (I
wonder if they are still around and watching). I wanted to see if I
could get it working on VM/370 on Hercules and on z/VM 5.3. I was
looking to replace
Thom,
Is it freely distributable? Could it be put on a download site some where?
Dave Wade G4UGM
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thomas Kern
Sent: 18 November 2008 18:19
To:
I haven't looked at the copyright statements, but it seemed freely
distributable when I first got a copy. I don't know for sure, but it may
have been on a Waterloo Mods tape for a couple of years. I will look at
the copyright, but I do not have a server that it can be served out from.
Would
Tom,
Thanks for that, if it is ok I am sure I can find a site to store it on. I
asked about restrictions because some of this old stuff came with odd
distribution restrictions, some of which might be hard to satisfy these
days...
Dave Wade G4UGM
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
-Original
When it was originally distributed, it was freely distributable since it
was funded by public monies. We never did get money for it after the
fact.
Louis
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Wade
Sent: Tuesday, November 18,
If this is the same version of the code that I gave Tom, it originated from one
of the old VM Workshop tapes...1988 or 1989...I believe.
George Shedlock Jr
AEGON Information Technology
AEGON USA
502-560-3541
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL
From a google search (even the names don't change often!) , and then more
below...
---snip---
Re: SLAC VM Batch System availability ?
Thomas Kern
Wed, 26 Dec 2007 05:51:07 -0800
If you do find a Sysprog or User's guide, I would like to get a copy.
The last time I implemented the LARS/Purdue
More light coming -:) Thanks so much.
Suleiman Shahin
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:53:44 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SSLSERV
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Re: SSLSERV
One per TCPIP stack. You need to use some kind of connection distribution
outside the VM stack to manage
Sure. Send them to me and I'll put them up.
On 11/18/08 1:54 PM, Thomas Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't looked at the copyright statements, but it seemed freely
distributable when I first got a copy. I don't know for sure, but it may
have been on a Waterloo Mods tape for a couple of
Has anyone seen specs for the new CMS based SSL that will be available next
month for 5.4 (maybe earlier releases too)
Will it support more than 128 connections?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Suleiman Shahin
Sent: Tuesday,
Rather than posting your ³perceived solution² to your problem, can you tell
us what your actual problem is? What are you trying to solve, as opposed to
what you think the solution might be?
By the way: CMS has been able to accept lower case at the command line for
many years. CP tends to convert
On Tuesday, 11/18/2008 at 11:30 EST, Scully, William P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan, doesn't the setting of CP TERM MODE have an effect on commands?
In TERM MODE CP everything is uppercase.
Yes, TERM MODE CP would give the symptoms of upper case input redisplay,
but the example showed the
On Tuesday, 11/18/2008 at 02:51 EST, Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Has anyone seen specs for the new CMS based SSL that will be available
next
month for 5.4 (maybe earlier releases too)
Will it support more than 128 connections?
Yes. :-)
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM
Yes, you have seen the specs or Yes, it will support more than 128
connections?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 12:01 PM
To:
Hi,
I would like to know if anyone of you had already either installed or
configured Linuz on zSeries running natively on a LPAR with Xen. I know
that this might sound very weird for most of you , but a customer had
asked me about this and I need to understand the major drawbacks of this
LPAR implies the s390 (or s390x) instruction set and architecture.
Xen implies the i386 (or ia64 or x86_64) instruction set and architecture.
The two are really unrelated.
-- Rick;
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if anyone of you
On 11/18/2008 at 3:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if anyone of you had already either installed or
configured Linuz on zSeries running natively on a LPAR with Xen. I know
that this might sound very weird for most of you , but a customer had
asked me about
On Tuesday, 11/18/2008 at 03:06 EST, Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, you have seen the specs or Yes, it will support more than 128
connections?
Yes, I have seen the specs. Yes, it will support more than 128
connections.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
On Tuesday, 11/18/2008 at 09:54 EST, Kris Buelens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Note: you need a write link to a FULLPACK minidisk that covers the DRCT
area.
... because DIRECTXA looks at the ALLOCATION MAP on the volume to find the
DRCT area. Kind of prehistoric, after a fashion, but it makes
On Tuesday, 11/18/2008 at 12:43 EST, Bruce Hayden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Doesn't it depend on which type of guest LAN you defined? I.e., TYPE
HIPERS or TYPE QDIO? The default is a hipersockets type. (I have no
z/OS experience!)
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Neale Ferguson [EMAIL
Hmm. OK, how about this.
- He's on a real 3278 with the blue switch which selects: a,A / A
- Or perhaps a 3277, where the display is always in upper-case, even
though the keyboard strokes are in mixed case.
- Or, while we're grasping at straws, how about this: Someone removed
that APAR
Actually there have been 3277's that displayed mixed case. The test
room in IBM BE was equipped with a mixture of both. I always looked
for one that was mixed case capable. Even when I had no luck, I tried
to work with mixed case but couldn't verify my typings then.
2008/11/18 Scully, William
Came back from a meeting and my brain hurts
We are forcing the integration of VSE into a new Identity Manager (IDM) system.
Currently we manage security for VSE via a bunch of REXX execs up in CMS. With
a bunch of VSE systems, this was a good place to keep stuff that may need to be
sent
I've tried IE 6 and FireFox 2.0.0.6. In both cases the FTP transfer started and
it no sooner started and then finished. The resultant file of the transfer was
only 1K for what should have been an 2-3GB source file.
HITACHI
DATA SYSTEMS
Raymond E. Noal
Senior Technical Engineer
Office:
I've tried IE 6 and FireFox 2.0.0.6. In both cases the FTP transfer
started and it no sooner started and then finished. The resultant file
of
the transfer was only 1K for what should have been an 2-3GB source
file.
IE6 is known to fail reliably.
Firefox 2 should work, although 3 is obviously
Installing FireFox 3.x is my planned next step. Thanks to all who responded.
HITACHI
DATA SYSTEMS
Raymond E. Noal
Senior Technical Engineer
Office: (408) 970 - 7978
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Boyes
Sent:
It's dead, Jim. 8-)
AFAIK, all the 32-bit only versions are dead and gone out of service.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of August Carideo
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 4:55 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Z/Vm
I think z/VM 4.3's EOS was May 31, 2005
Scott R Wandschneider
Senior Systems Programmer|| Infocrossing, a Wipro Company || 11707 Miracle
Hills Drive, Omaha, NE, 68154-4457|| ': 402.963.8905 || Ë:847.849.7223 || ::
[EMAIL PROTECTED] **Think Green - Please print responsibly**
-Original
On Tuesday, 11/18/2008 at 04:58 EST, August Carideo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure I read correctly, but I thought support for z/VM 4.3 had
ended a while ago
someone is trying to tell me it ends April 2009
won't be 1st time I am wrong
EOS 5/31/2005 from this link ?
There is such a thing, I played with it about a year or two ago, I don't
remember too much about it.. It was maybe a XML parser in WEBSHARE ... I'll
look at my notes to see if I wrote anything down about it.. If i find anything
further I'll let you know.
-Original Message-
From: The
In the old days, an alternate directory area, was always built on another drive.
It was fairly easy.
On another CPOWNed pack, use CPFMTXA to format a few cylinders and mark it as
directory area.
When you do a DIRECTXA, it reads the directory record: DIRECTORY 123 3390
520RES
and put the
On Tuesday, 11/18/2008 at 06:01 EST, Les Geer (607-429-3580)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure I read correctly, but I thought support for z/VM 4.3
had
ended a while ago
someone is trying to tell me it ends April 2009
won't be 1st time I am wrong
EOS 5/31/2005 from this link ?
Mine's older, 1900. What do I win?
$FCOPY$ $PROFILE Z2 V 79 43 1 2/05/1998 14:07:48
$FCOPY$ HELPCMS Z1 V 79150 2 5/09/1900 15:25:11
$FCOPY$ XEDITZ2 V116901 7 8/24/1998 7:48:19
I do have other things that do
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just trying to do some housekeeping and got a strange display to a
simple listfile command.
It looks like the old Y2K bug is alive and well...
I did not know we had CMS file system in 1908...
You may want to get
I am not sure I read correctly, but I thought support for z/VM 4.3 had
ended a while ago
someone is trying to tell me it ends April 2009
won't be 1st time I am wrong
EOS 5/31/2005 from this link ?
http://www.vm.ibm.com/techinfo/lpmigr/VMLEOS.HTML
You are correct. April 2009 is the EoS
Those would be from VM/36 (unrelated to System 36, an early precursor to
VM/370 - that's a JOKE for those who find this years in the future).
What z/VM release level are those from?
Our z/VM 5.1 system reports $PROFILEs (to pick just one filetype) with:
Filename Filetype Fm Format Lrecl
Herman Hollerith invented it. That is why the initial CMS file system
had 80-byte fixed length records :)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huegel, Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:47 PM
Each night an automated process here uses DIRECTXA to write a current copy
of the USER DIRECT file (extracted fresh from VM:Secure, and with an
adjusted DIRECTORY statement) to a DASD different than the production
sysres.
It would only be used in a wildly unexpected disaster. We already have
I was just trying to do some housekeeping and got a strange display to a simple
listfile command.
It looks like the old Y2K bug is alive and well...
I did not know we had CMS file system in 1908...
listfile * * b (d before 2000-11-18 full
FILENAME FILETYPE FM FORMAT LRECL RECS
On Tuesday, 11/18/2008 at 05:27 EST, Tom Duerbusch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, in your method of putting another DRCT area on a pack, how would you
ever
use it?
It was just an experiment. Now you've made me gather more data. (sigh)
There are specific rules for bringing a directory
Hello,
Can any one tell me the best way or what commands to use to dump the reader and
print spool queues to tape?
Thanks
Yes, works fine (including the Rules Facility). What do you need to
know?
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Buettner, Wolfgang
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 11:24 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: z/VM 5.4 and
I am trying to run the following code:
code
/* */
date1='12 OCT 2008'
date2='13 OCT 2008'
trace i
date11 = DATE('B',date1)
date21 = DATE('B',date2)
say '--diff=:'date21-date11-1
exit
/code
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 11/18/2008
03:33:48 PM:
I am trying to run the following code:
code
/* */
date1='12 OCT 2008'
date1='12 Oct 2008'
date2='13 OCT 2008'
date2='13 Oct 2008'
Fussy, no?
Mark L. Wheeler
IT Infrastructure, 3M Center B224-4N-20,
Hey Phil, among others not sure what you mean. I worked Chemical Bank
between 1982-1986, IFR Publishing in London for 1987, and IBM since then.
..
Talk about paging space and recall times...
by the way, today we announced our intension to acquire Transitive to
enhance our virtualization options.
http://cathcam.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/ibm-annouces-plans-to-acquire-
transitive/
Can any one tell me the best way or what commands to use to dump the reader
and print spool queues to tape?
To dump all of the files on each of the reader, print and punch queues:
SPXTAPE DUMP vdev RDR ALL
SPXTAPE DUMP vdev PRT ALL
SPXTAPE DUMP vdev PUN ALL
You can also dump all of these with
I have a .het file (compressed AWS, I think). It has 9 tape files with
the real files named in a pattern for some sort of a file sharing
system. I will write a rexx exec tomorrow to rename each file to it's
original fn/ft and create a VMARC for each tape file. I will then create
an AWS tape-file
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
