On 9/18/09 11:58 AM, "Schuh, Richard" wrote:
> Hey Zeke Boyes, who is Bill Schuh? I don't even know of a relative by that
> name :-)
It's your lawful good alter ego, arch nemesis of Chuckie. The Saturday
morning cartoon starring the Billster debuts next TV season, along with
"Danger at Rockland
On 9/18/09 9:38 AM, "Huegel, Thomas" wrote:
> A little OT, but curiosity calls.. What is the max. storage that z/LINUX
> can use?
Last time I looked at the Linux memory management code (a while back) it was
4TB, but that's probably expanded by now. The documented z/VM limit of 8TB
has been arou
On 9/18/09 9:32 AM, "Bill Holder" wrote:
> That is indeed one important question, but there was another one, the
> question of whether this was a denial of service attack exposure, which i
> t
> is not.
I think that's a point of view question.
If I am another user on the same VM system, happy
On 9/17/09 2:16 PM, "Adam Thornton" wrote:
> "Administrator typo" is not a failure mode the operating system is
> designed to protect you from.
That may be true now, but I think the point of the argument is that it
should not be.
On VMS, if you have a SYSTEM priv bit set, the system will sti
On 9/17/09 5:18 PM, "Alan Altmark" wrote:
> If I get my way, ENABLE CLEAR_TDISK will become the default and you won't
> be able to change it. :-)
Want a requirement? 8-)
-- db
On 9/15/09 12:09 PM, "Daniel P. Martin" wrote:
> *cough*SHARE requirement?*cough*
WAVV requirement WRIBDB04 submitted.
I suggested a SYSTEM CONFIG option and corresponding SET command to warn
user/operator and optionally halt IPL if a user requested LOGON or issued an
IPL command with a default
Professional models? I just can't connect them with our zLinux fashion.
Anyone has the same feeling with me?
The only “professional models” I’ve ever seen at SHARE were booth bunnies at
the Orlando SHARE.
Definitely identifiable as “not attendees”, if nothing else by dress (or lack
thereof). 8-
CPVOL Format cyl 0.
> Is there a way to remove a volume label? (ICKDSF only has a way to ADD
> a label.)
> > Hmph. 3 Harvard Square, Cambridge, MA (Our Fair City).
>
> So it would seem from Google Maps, but in fact, the Boston Area branch
> of
> DC&H is located in a culvert that runs *beneath* CarTalk Plaza.
Except that it's on the 3rd floor. See photo in Wikipedia.
-- db
> be kind enough to direct all future inquries to my attorneys, Dewey,
> Cheatham, and Howe, LLC, New York, attention: Chuckie.
Hmph. 3 Harvard Square, Cambridge, MA (Our Fair City).
> Yes, we have an emergency 1-pack 3390-3 IPLable z/VM sysres DASD ...
> but
> how many newbies do? No IBM doc that I recall describes creating a 1-
> pack
> emergency IPL disk, nor the importance of creating it immediately after
> fully completing the first z/VM installation for the first time (w
If you did SET RUN ON in the PROFILE EXEC, it won't. That's why I said "if".
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Dean, David (I/S)
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 9:55 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: DASD additions for zLinux
So the
As soon as the entries are in the user directory, you can log on to the console
of the Linux guest and issue #CP LINK * cuu cuu MR, and BEGIN (if the Linux
guest stopped when you logged in. Linux will then detect the device and you
can proceed. #CP DISC to disconnect and leave the Linux guest r
On 9/2/09 8:09 PM, "Alan Altmark" wrote:
> Alas, my friend, it was your second level system on fullpack minis that
> used the same volsers! You forgot to change one! The LPAR I/O config was
> "in conformance to policy".
I stopped using fullpack minidisks for 2nd level systems long, long ago.
On 9/2/09 6:59 PM, "Alan Altmark" wrote:
>
> Eye of the beholder? The point is to avoid an IPL/re-IPL disaster. If
> you pick up the correct volumes at IPL and use DEVNO minidisks, then all
> users, including the 2nd level system, will have the correct volumes
> backing their minidisks. No wor
On 9/2/09 5:07 PM, "Alan Altmark" wrote:
> I don't think the packaging format is an issue. If people are *permitted*
> to run shareware on their z/VM systems, they do.
I respectfully disagree. If there is a configuration management system in
place on the system, it should be possible for ANYTHIN
If we were talking about overrides to change the USERIDs used, not the volume
labels, I think I'd be more accepting of this. I don't see where changing the
volume ids really helps much with separating the two. If you don't change the
PPFs, then it's still just as easy to accidentally update prod
Your safest bet is probably to use VMARC format (see the IBM VM Download page),
it's pretty much a standard on VM.
This is one of the tools I'd really like to VMSES-package, at least until the
day we can convince the IBM lawyers that having a "contributed tools" minidisk
would be a Good Thing.
Install to minidisks that start on cyl 1 on your level 2 userid. When you're
ready to go production, you can copy the maintained system from cyl 1 to end to
cyl 0 to end on your new IPL and spool packs with the relocate option in DDR.
The IBM install tapes are deliberately 1 cyl short of a real
> I'm not aware of an existing formal requirement, but yes, we know and
> agree. It's on the "list", though not sure exactly when it might
> appear...
WAVV Requirement WRIDB03, submitted today. Ask and ye shall receive.
-- db
> If you are referring to CP_Owned slots, you can define up to 255.You
> always want to have some slots defined as Reserved, so you can add
> volumes to the list while your system is running.
>
> Hint: Gaps in slot numbers defined in your CP_Owned list are filled in
> with Reserved slots, wh
> Excuse me for this probably simple question. I want to dump multiple
> 3390-3 DASD volumes to one 3590 volume. What would be the DDR command
> for this?
Multiple INPUT, OUTPUT, DUMP ALL command cards.
Example input to DDR:
SYSPRINT CONS
INPUT 100 3390 FOOBAR
OUTPUT 181 3490
DUMP ALL
INPUT 1
On 8/24/09 7:12 PM, "Alan Altmark" wrote:
> I am rapidly moving to the opinion that VM TCP/IP should use a VSWITCH and
> let the VSWITCH handle failover at the hardware level rather than needing
> multiple IP addresses, VIPAs, and dynamic routing.
> When VSWITCHes first became available, I was
On 8/20/09 1:15 PM, "Bill Munson" wrote:
> I think Jim goes into it briefly with this presentation - a follow up to
> 9117
> 9118 - Servicing and Maintaining z/VM with VM/SES - Live Demo
I've seen a previous version of this -- it covers how to apply pre-packaged
service and local mods to IBM-pa
On 8/19/09 5:57 PM, "Kris Buelens" wrote:
> If you invent your own product IDs, you can even catalog your own files when
> copied to 19E. With a new release, VMFCOPY can be used to copy all files of a
> given product ID from the old to the new 19E. That's what I did to store some
> customer cod
Can you explain some more regarding the this process and how to set it up.
Here's the high-level version:
1) Create a PRODUCTS userid and create a reasonably large minidisk at a
known address (I use 31A for historical reasons - it was used in VM/IPF as the
shared tools disk). You coul
Does the z/VM Monitor data provide the timestamp of the underlying IODF in any
of its records? Can someone explain what is meant by IODF?
IODF is the way that z/OS defines I/O configurations. It's possible to force VM
to use the same method, but it disables the dynamic discovery functions in
On 8/13/09 2:22 PM, "Marcy Cortes" wrote:
Can you email me that chart?
Or is it paper?
And thanks Alan A for that link. That helps.
The copy I have is paper, but I'll try to get it scanned and send it to you
offlist.
> interesting to try and locate the knee.
I found a copy of the Reed Mullen chart I mentioned.
On a z990, the MP effect for VM kicked in seriously at 14 processors for VM
workload. For z/OS workload the MP effect became serious at 9 processors.
I suspect that the z10 is a very different animal,
Sounds like you have a good case for it, then. It does what it does very
well, and if you're really tight on resources, then it's probably a viable
solution for you. It increases the administrative work to support terminals,
though, but you've already considered that. And, as you say, it gets
Reed Mullen used to have a chart in one of his presentations that
showed that the MP effect was still present for VM workload but that
the impact was smaller than for Z/OS and kicked it later in the curve.
I don't remember the precise numbers (and the z10 probably has changed
everything) but
Unless you really, really need sophisticated VTAM connectivity (ie, you funnel
people into a session manager and need more function than a dialed terminal can
provide) or you're REALLY REALLY tight on CPU on the standard engine side, it's
kinda overkill for just terminal support. The telnet serv
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 16:06, Gary M. Dennis wrote:
>> Does anyone know of a way to access very large chunks of DS8000 storage
>> without minidisk definitions?
>>
>> We are looking for a way to allocate substantial increments of storage
>> (several terabytes at a time) with the least admini
MAILBOOK (which does this and a whole lot more) is still available.
On 7/30/09 3:05 PM, "Thomas Kern" wrote:
I use the MAILIT package from the IBM Downloads website.
/Tom Kern
On 7/27/09 1:03 PM, "sunny...@wcb.ab.ca" wrote:
> What will happen if one zlinux running on 2 z/VM?
> There is a IP conflict and dasd R/W conflict.
> So it is the same as running two linux server sharing the same IP and the same
> disks?
Exactly.
> And z/VM has done nothing with
On 7/25/09 2:46 AM, "Rob van der Heij" wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 3:59 AM, David Boyes wrote:
>
>> If you want this to work, then you need to configure CSE in your VM
>> installation so that CP enforces that a user can be logged in on only one
>> system
On 7/24/09 6:19 PM, "sunny...@wcb.ab.ca" wrote:
> We sometimes accidently turn on one linux guest on two z/VM systems.
Bad, BAD idea. If they are in separate systems and the disks are shared R/W,
then they will corrupt each other, and probably damage both to the point of
being completely unusabl
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
> Behalf Of Alan Altmark
>:
??? Actually, I didn't understand that at all. What were you trying to show --
the steps in the IBM SYSPROF?
> (One can dream, right? I know - not on Thursdays
Do you still have the original that you submitted?
I doubt it. Someone made me clean my file closet. Names will not be mentioned.
-- db
> As for at what moments to invoke such an exit (eg before accessing the
> A-disk, after accessing the D disk, etc) a committee would end up with
> a massive number of options and choices.
Sure. I know what I'd suggest, but if I'm going to do the writing, then a
consensus is useful.
> Instead,
> FWIW, I can't find a Requirement for this in the requirements database.
I submitted one 4 or 5 years back and had it closed SUG. If someone has a more
concrete set of suggestions, I'd be glad to write it up.
-- db
> Does anyone know of a document that provides a xref between numeric IBM
> machine types, and an english description of what than machine is?
Sales Manual app on IBMlink. It used to be more complete, but IBM took out a
lot of the older stuff (boo hiss!) not too long ago.
(seriously, guys, does
> Many years ago, IBM had a package, I think it was called REXX/CUA. I am
> not in the office today or I could give you the product number. We
> wrote
> several menued execs using it. I don't remember the price, if there was
> a price. It was ALL in REXX and XEDIT.
CUA2001. I think it's in the IBM
> Easy for you to say.
Sent Jim a set of iptables rules that should do the job.
Would anyone else find a VM-based "screening"/firewall virtual machine useful?
Would you contribute time or money to it's creation? If so, let me know
off-list and I'll see what we can coordinate. We've been runnin
> z/OS being the current
> poster
> child
I can just see the rain-drenched vista of the Poughkeepsie IBM plant in the
poster with a soaking wet z10 sitting on the lawn out front, with the word
"Give." in a big white square at the bottom of the poster.
-- db
Simple answer: put a Linux guest in front of the VM TCP stack with the old
address as the external address, renumber the VM stack to a RFC1918 address on
an internal guest lan, and enable IP Masquerade in iptables. That gets you all
sorts of useful info, and lets you shut them down cold. Add one
> After a z10, it would always be a z11 if IBM suddenly switched over to
> binary, right? Then a z100, etc...
Well, actually, assuming any reasonably rational base, 11 would always follow
10. The question gets interesting when you reach n symbols in a single position
(assuming zero as minimum).
First guess: you don't have NAMESRV in the PORT section of your PROFILE TCPIP.
Should be both TCP and UDP port 53.
Second: seriously consider using a very small Linux guest and bind9 for this.
You get a lot more functionality and your networking people will be lots
happier if they have a famil
If some folks can agree on what it should do, I'll do the writeup. I don't
think it's going to be very high on the priority list, though, since the
workaround is so easy.
> I think CP doesn't do wildcards because we didn't ask for it. We didn't
> a
> sk for it because we could
> throw togethe
> Wouldn't it be nice if you could 'ifconfig
> eth*'?
You can in Plan 9. 8-)
> >Hello Les,
> >
> >I was looking through the handover from Dick. I have tried the EOT=N
> but no
> >luck either.
> >
> >The parms now look like:
> >PARM P002NT EXIT=LPRXPSE EPARM='EH=N EOT=N C=LPRP' HOST=161.9=0.24.70
> #
> >PORT=9100 PRINT=P002NT SECURE=NO TI
> >
> > #
> >
> We are preparing for a test and loading the database is taking forever.
> Paging is high. I/O devices are less than 5% busy. CPU is never more
> than
> 20%. An Oracle file import is taking over 14 hours. Any Idea's with
> this
> little bit of info to go on
If you can give the LPAR a little bit o
> All these Tivoli products ship with WAS and/or DB2 bundled inside of
> them.
> How come RACF and zSecure can't ship ISPF bundled within. Seems like
> the product would more useful that way :)
Amen! It *can't* cost more to support it bundled. And PVM so that we can do CSE
properly while you wr
Use your performance monitor and extract the data for his students from the
general data.
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
> Behalf Of Mary Zervos
> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 10:53 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subje
Yep. You can still get them from good engineering libraries, but you need to be
on good terms with the library. They're expensive journals. The ACM and IEEE
digital libraries still index them if you pay for those.
It seems kind of penny wise, pound foolish (those two journals are some of
IBM's
Sort of. There is some information on the line protocol, but nothing official.
There is a implementation of a PVM end node on one of the CBT tapes that could
probably be used as a basis.
I do have a somewhat working implementation for very simple Linux console
terminal support, but it's not gen
Last I checked, still special bid only. And quite expensive.
Maybe I should look at writing a replacement (at least a client implementation).
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Matthew Donald
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:12 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.U
Two things:
1) make sure you followed all the steps in the program directory. The
PDF panels and code are not in the default ISPF libraries, and you
need to modify the ISPF startup exec to add the additional Txtlib and
maclibs.
2) make sure the ISPF saved segment is not overlapping somethin
> David also proposed, I thought, writing a requirement that we publish
> the
> procedure, as you suggested. THAT is what I was suggesting is a
> non-starter.
Not guilty, your honor. I was speculating that you could provide a PXEboot
image that could boot from another source over the network, an
> The desire to have a DVD-based DR system would be a good requirement to
> levy against IBM Backup and Restore for z/VM.
Wilder idea: how about a PXEboot based system? If the HMC could issue a PXEboot
request for a particular LPAR, then you could set up a TFTP server on your
choice of systems a
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
> Behalf Of Alan Altmark
> [snip]
> Users coming in from different networks can be given different logos
> ONLY
> IF they are telnetting to a separate TCPIP stack (e.g. TCPIP2) since CP
> has no a
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
> Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
> We've got multiple tape libraries now and so multiple RM_AUTO_LIBRARY
> statements.
> RMSMASTR has a nasty habit of failing to initialize when one of these
> libraries i
> IBM, has anyone submitted a requirement?
> Marcy
If not, I just wrote it up and will submit it via WAVV.
The early version I have (really REALLY old) seems to run OK in linemode. I
don't know if the modern version would. Certainly all the ISPF goodies in the
modern one don't work.
I have to admit that I've not tried it there but it is written in REXX although
the file I/O is the z/OS EXECIO.
> Hi list, I would like to ask if there's a way to e-mail a CMS file as
> an
> attachment and not as the text itself. We have been trying to achieve
> this
> but haven't succeeded yet. All we get is the file as text, not as
> attachment.
Two ways you could do it : Use XMITIP or (for a more full-fu
> You could use IBM Softcopy Librarian to download both book manager and
> PDS formats.
>
> http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/df/ebrsclwj.exe
That will get you the individual files. I think he's asking if .iso images of
the entire collection can be downloaded in one swell foop (analogous to th
> We have the "shutdown -
> h"
> in
> the inittab.
Hmm. But you are still getting the shutting down for reboot message, which
seems odd to me. I think there's something funny in your init scripts for
starting/stopping Oracle -- there should be something there that makes the
shutdown process sy
> It
> appears that linux sends the termination response to vm before it has
> really completed it's (linux)shutdown. In linux's inittab we have
> "shutdown -h" coded.
But your example shows a automatic reboot and the system trying to come back
up. Something else is wrong... do you specify vmpoff
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/06/teddy_bears_now_symbolize_frau.html?mid=daily-intel--20090609
Somebody needs to correct these... people. They're messing with the Bear.
n Db
n
On 6/3/09 1:13 PM, "Tom Duerbusch" wrote:
> Once you get a VSE system up (via tape), you have VSE Virtual Tape available.
> You can use that with the IP flavor (instead of the VSAM flavor) to store VSE
> Virtual Tapes. Now, you can get a TB USB drive for around $1,500 and they are
> portable. H
Others will probably chime in to tell you exactly what numbers to use, but the
gist of the matter is that you adjust the CP SET SHARE value for the "special"
userids to be higher than the others, but lower than the machines you need to
access the system to fix it if it breaks, eg test and dev sh
>> So, why don't you just update the message put out in MSG10 to
>> say what you want?
>>
>> Mark Post
Because he'd still have to be running VTAM for that to work.
The other solutions mentioned allow him to drop VM/VTAM immediately,
with no chance of someone working around the message using a m
> To access the online library catalog enter D PONY below
> It was the easiest way to handle it.
And they get a pony. Woo-hoo.
-- db
> Does anyone have any ideas short of just sending all users an email
> telling them to use telnet instead of SNA?
If you have PVM, there is a way to set a notification on an attempt to connect
to a host. You could also stand up YVETTE, which has a system message screen.
You also might ask Rick
On 5/21/09 4:33 PM, "Carlos Martinez" wrote:
> If there really is a need to access a VSAM file from VM/CMS does it really
> have to be VSAM?
If you need to do random access to the file, then yes, you need VSAM. Your
method works fine IF you only need sequential access to the file AND you can
Try
TAPE MODESET (3590C
TAPE WVOL1 (TAP1
TAPE REW (TAP1
On 5/21/09 4:12 PM, "Lee Stewart" wrote:
Same error... Even TAPE WVOL1 (3590C
Lee
Imler, Steven J wrote:
> Use ... TAPE WVOL1 ... to re-initialize the tapes.
>
> JR (Steven) Imler
> CA
> +1-703-708-3479
> steven.im...@ca.com
>
> -
On 5/21/09 2:24 PM, "Hal Schmitigal" wrote:
I don't know if I qualify as "SES Expert" but here's what I do/know:
> 1) A PSP bucket can have a "PTF EXCLUDE LIST". (I am working with
> 0901RSU, which in this case the list is empty.) When we order a PSP
> bucket for a particular RSU, if there are a
If it's on the same system, check and see if you can find a copy of RXLDEV.
That gives you REXX functions to handle CP logical devices, which makes writing
stuff like this a lot easier.
Failing that, you can also use line-mode TELNET connections as TTY devices.
That gives you a virtual 3215 as
On 5/21/09 3:46 AM, "Fred Schmidt" wrote:
>
> What do you recommend as a solution to allow more than one person to fulfil
> the role of making changes to z/VM system configuration files such as SYSTEM
> CONFIG
Use CMS EXECUPDT on the file, and generate it from the updates. This also
gets you ele
On 5/20/09 9:46 PM, "Jim Bohnsack" wrote:
> [snip] Was there a separate VM/370 1401
> emulator or were you just running DOS or DOS/VS under VM/370?
Honestly, I don't remember much about it other than they kept paying for the
darn thing month after month and that the programs were Crawling Horror
On 5/20/09 3:54 PM, "Tom Duerbusch" wrote:
> When mainframes just started getting into IP communications, one of the things
> we were warned about is to filter out any unnecessary IP traffic that is not
> for the same subnet that the mainframe was on. The reason that I remember, is
> that the IP
On 5/20/09 11:56 AM, "David L. Craig" wrote:
> I must be missing something here. Shops that had it before
> IBM decided to drop support (because there weren't any problems
> to resolve) will continue to get it as they upgrade VM, but
> new shops cannot get it for love nor money?
As long as you
On 5/20/09 4:29 AM, "jose raul baron" wrote:
> - Does VSAM still exist in z/VM 5.4 ?
You can still use it if you have it, but no new licenses are available and
the product has been pulled from marketing. It still works, and you use the
same installation instructions as you did on 4.4. It also ha
PostScript would probably be the logical PJL choice insofar as it would allow
you to define abstract words (I've seen sites that defined PS equivalents for
the Xerox DJDE inline commands) and change the meaning by using a header file
to define the magic words. Run that through a Linux guest runn
On 5/14/09 3:57 PM, "Craig Dudley" wrote:
> Hi,
> I wonder if anyone is attaching a LTO4 (Linear Tape Open, Generation 4),
> via FCP, to a z9 or z10 running zVM 5.4?
> And if yes, are there any zVM utilities (DDR, SPXTAPE, etc) that support
> LTO4s?
No native CP or CMS commands support SCSI tape
Mono is already ported (thanks to the ever-brilliant Neale Ferguson).
Didn't Evolution used to be open source? Did Novell make it closed source when
they took over Ximian? If it's open source, then it should be possible to get
someone to port Mono (which is open source) and Evolution (which i
On 5/6/09 12:17 PM, "Schuh, Richard" wrote:
> Really remote - about 2000 miles away.
Yeah, that would definitely qualify as remote. I think it would be a timing
problem mostly -- can the device deliver data in the expected time frame for
IPL to look valid -- but I suspect there's going to be no
Did it once on a 4361. Haven't tried it recently. I suppose it would depend a
lot on how far away and how good the channel extenders were.
On 5/5/09 6:47 PM, "Schuh, Richard" wrote:
Has anyone ever ipled a stand-alone program, Hidro in particular, from a
remote tape drive? Is it even possibl
On 5/1/09 4:20 PM, "Alan Altmark" wrote:
> Morituri te Salutant! :-)
Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori, sed dulcius pro patria vivere, et
dulcissimum pro patria bibere. Ergo, bibamus pro salute patriae.
-- db
One thing though: There is a non-VM version of VMARC that can extract the files
on other platforms (Leland rocks!). I know of no utility that can extract FCOPY
archives on other platforms.
On 4/29/09 3:00 PM, "Huegel, Thomas" wrote:
I'll second the FCOPY idea. I use it everyday to 'archive' m
On 4/29/09 10:28 AM, "Bob Bates" wrote:
> They are not because each is defined separately. From User2 try LINK User1 700
> 701 RR and see what that gets you.
>
> Just like all the users having 191, that doesn't mean they are shared with one
> another.
Although you should NOT share disks used f
I don't suppose it's possible to duplicate the entry node MVS1N? If it's only
role is to route files, it might be worth fixing the SPOF. Then you could have
dual links and just let one go down with MVS1N.
Another option would be an outboard NJE node that isn't dependent on MVS1N at
all. Use an
On 4/26/09 9:37 PM, "Les Geer" wrote:
> I haven't looked through the code which handles how files are queued
> and transmitted in any great detail. However, what you describe
> sounds reasonable. In your MVSPLEX example, MVS1 must be first
> in the group list so it will always be picked.
Or a
On 4/23/09 8:00 PM, "Mark Wheeler" wrote:
> Following David Boyes' example, set up something like:
> LINKDEF MVS1A NODE MVS1 TYPE SNANJE LUNAME MVS1ALU ASTART RETRY
> PARM MVS1A BUFF=3840
> LINKDEF MVS1B NODE MVS1 TYPE SNANJE LUNAME MVS1BLU ASTART RETRY
> PA
I think you could use link groups here. You'd have to define MVS1A and MVS1B to
VM, then create a group MVS1 that contains the MVS1A and MVS1B links. You could
then route files passing through RSCS to GROUP MVS1 and it would pick the first
available link to queue it on. If MVS1A went away, then
On 4/22/09 2:57 PM, "Mike Walter" wrote:
>> in a corner under the bush
> I knew that Africa was pretty exotic, but bushes with corners? Now that's
> just wrong. ;-)
Not really. The bush roots formed a enclosed space. I doubt the hyena was in
any shape to notice.
-- db
On 4/21/09 2:42 PM, "Schuh, Richard" wrote:
>> It'll perform like a hyena with a bullet through it's head
> I almost hate to ask, what is the source of that analogy?
OK, but remember: you asked...
Earlier in my career, I did telco install and design work for a lot of
overseas installations. Whil
On 4/22/09 10:38 AM, "Gary M. Dennis" wrote:
> Only A to B as we have no broadcast requirement.
You will. Efficient implementation of multicast will need a similar
transport capability.
On 4/21/09 2:21 PM, "Marc Schoechlin" wrote:
>> Shut down the provided Linux system and type IPL CMS. Presto. VM system.
>
> :-) I asked for a z/VM system with maint access
Install the demo system there. There's plenty of space, and that actually
might be a legal venue. And you can do anyt
Shut down the provided Linux system and type IPL CMS. Presto. VM system.
On 4/21/09 2:06 PM, "Marc Schoechlin" wrote:
Thanks, thats interesting. LCDS only seems to provide linux systems.
401 - 500 of 1510 matches
Mail list logo
