Hey all,
I'm starting to write the what's new guide for the next release? Have
any favourite features that you think should be included, please let
me know!
thanks,
Glynn
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://ma
On 17/06/2009, at 12:48 PM, Che Kristo wrote:
Great idea, maybe a project (under the desktop community) focused on
the
effort would be a good idea? Particluarly with the ARM port...i'm
sure the
netbook will be a viable platform in the future
I'd certainly like to see someone have a try at
On 10/06/2009, at 12:57 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
on Tue Jun 09 2009, Brock Pytlik wrote:
Update manager does an image update which (for now) updates an
alternate BE. So, it's
technically correct when it tells you that an update is available
for the current BE
just after you've updated i
On 10/06/2009, at 12:13 AM, Calum Benson wrote:
On 9 Jun 2009, at 02:41, Glynn Foster wrote:
On 9/06/2009, at 9:49 AM, Dave Miner wrote:
As the set of packages that are present on the live CD is a
favorite topic of discussion among some of us, I thought I'd pass
along one pie
On 9/06/2009, at 9:49 AM, Dave Miner wrote:
As the set of packages that are present on the live CD is a favorite
topic of discussion among some of us, I thought I'd pass along one
piece of "data" (quotes because the methodology here is unclear to
me) that might provide some input. Those o
On 18/05/2009, at 1:12 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
Hello,
Seems like a silly question, but when is the next update b112 and
b113 going to be available when I do a pkg refresh?
I am talking of the /dev repository
Since the b111a it has gone silent.
It won't happen until after the 2009.06 l
On 30/04/2009, at 12:02 PM, Jim Walker wrote:
Glynn Foster wrote:
For a sneak preview of what's on the list for 2009.06, take a look at
http://www.gnome.org/~gman/opensolaris-whats-new/
Comments welcome - I may have overlooked it. I'll be working to
finalize this during the wee
On 30/04/2009, at 9:19 AM, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
On Apr 29, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Stephen Hahn wrote:
2. Isn't there a laptops page on opensolaris.com for the Toshiba
systems? Could we also link to the Laptop community for
discussions about other laptops?
the growing community of n
On 30/04/2009, at 5:49 AM, Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Glynn Foster [2009-04-28 03:40]:
On 20/04/2009, at 9:25 AM, Glynn Foster wrote:
Hey all,
I'm starting to pull together the What's New in 2009.06 guide.
I'll be
looking through the list of new packages in David's
On 20/04/2009, at 9:25 AM, Glynn Foster wrote:
Hey all,
I'm starting to pull together the What's New in 2009.06 guide. I'll
be looking through the list of new packages in David's release
notes, along with Cyril's excellent blog which details the changes
going
On 24/04/2009, at 11:51 AM, Vincent Murphy wrote:
All,
Here is a link to the agenda and con-call information for tomorrow's
Townhall meeting
http://wiki.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/
OpenSolaris_Townhall_Apr_24_2009
Unfortunately we've been unable to record this call today, so I would
e
On 21/04/2009, at 4:39 AM, Ghee Teo wrote:
On 04/20/09 17:26, Ken Mays wrote:
Glynn,
Add some more info on CUPS, printer support,
more precisely, newer version of CUPS and also CUPS print manager
(or system-config-printer)
http://blogs.sun.com/gheet/entry/cups_print_manager_in_build
Hav
On 21/04/2009, at 1:37 PM, Sriram Natarajan wrote:
For a web developer, OpenSolaris 2009.06 includes
* Additional DTrace probes within PHP as well as MySQL 5.1
* version updates for Tomcat, Ruby, Apache and PHP. Also, MySQL 5.1
database is included as well.
Component version informations
On 21/04/2009, at 4:35 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:26:49 PDT
Ken Mays wrote:
Add some more info on CUPS, printer support, and the new Nvidia
180.xx driver support for Nvidia Quadro 5800 video support.
I can also think of Codeina, multimedia codec support, and Compiz
fe
On 21/04/2009, at 4:26 AM, Brian Cameron wrote:
Glynn:
elisa is an exciting new media application. Might want to highlight
that since it uses OpenGL, it doesn't work on systems that don't
support
OpenGL (much like compiz).
Exciting until it somehow does a server grab and you can't get o
On 20/04/2009, at 10:59 PM, Calum Benson wrote:
On 19 Apr 2009, at 22:25, Glynn Foster wrote:
Hey all,
I'm starting to pull together the What's New in 2009.06 guide. I'll
be looking through the list of new packages in David's release
notes, along with Cyril&#x
On 20/04/2009, at 7:23 PM, Lurie wrote:
* Crossbow - Network Virtualization and Resource Management
* Volo - Low Latency Socket Framework
* Labeled branded zones
* Event-based cpu power management + deep C state support for newer
processors
* "Fast reboot" feature
We had Fast Reboot for 20
Hey all,
I'm starting to pull together the What's New in 2009.06 guide. I'll be
looking through the list of new packages in David's release notes,
along with Cyril's excellent blog which details the changes going into
Nevada. If you have any ideas of what should be covered, send them
thro
On 25/02/2009, at 6:27 PM, Colin Zou wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
Hey Guys,
What's your opinion about this issue?
This is really unacceptable to me.
Thanks for forwarding this email and asking for opinions.
I don't see any benefits by disabling iiim-panel and IM activate/
deactivate trigger ke
Hey,
On 25/02/2009, at 12:16 PM, david.co...@sun.com wrote:
Bug reporting is important, but personally I think it is equally
important that some of us be forewarned about certain build(s)--and
share the info--so we can make optimized choice of our time as to
whether we should save our efforts f
On 9/02/2009, at 11:32 PM, Luca Morettoni wrote:
> On 02/09/09 11:23, Glynn Foster wrote:
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/advocacy-discuss/2009-February/003882.html
>
> thanks Glynn, I'll missed it :)
>
>> (btw, 6 months from .11 brings us to .5, which i
On 9/02/2009, at 10:46 PM, Luca Morettoni wrote:
> Few month ago we talk about OpenSolaris next release, called 2009.04
> (adding 6 month to 2008.11) but now I see the ISO names and post
> talking
> about 2009.06... I missend some thread or post about new name?
Dan mentioned it earlier this mo
On 4/02/2009, at 10:49 PM, Greg Palmer wrote:
> Luca Morettoni wrote:
>> On 02/03/09 20:58, david.co...@sun.com wrote:
>>
>>> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>>>
>>> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
>>>
>>
>> great release, I hate it into a virtualbox installation and all
>> work
Hey there,
If you like to mirror the OpenSolaris ISO images, or know of someone
running a download mirror locally, here is the command you'll likely
to need -
rsync -avz pkg.opensolaris.org::osol_release_isos .
The total image is about 14 GB so far (which includes 2008.05, and the
variou
On 6/12/2008, at 9:29 PM, SV wrote:
> Well thank you Shawn, I actually get it from
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/
>
> which doesn't seem to have such a helpful link.
Good point - I've added that now.
thanks,
Glynn
___
indiana-discuss ma
On 21/11/2008, at 6:50 AM, Shinobu Matsuzuka wrote:
> We need "input method" one way or another for international users.
> To some extent, there is always some performance hit. Comparing with
> and without iiim is useful and in fact, I agree it is important. But
> that's not a reason to dis
Hey,
In preparation for the launch of 2008.11 later this month (I hope
everyone's been trying the release candidate!), we're looking for some
interesting stories involving OpenSolaris. Are you doing something
interesting with OpenSolaris in a hosting environment within your
company? Have y
On 10/11/2008, at 8:07 AM, Bruce Rothermal wrote:
> Installed OpenSolaris 2008.11 on laptop Acer Aspire 7520-5071. No
> drivers for either wifi or ethernet devices are available. Wifi is
> Atheros AR5007EG 64b. Ethernet is nVidia MCP67 Ethernet.
I'd very much encourage you to log a bug on th
On 8/11/2008, at 3:20 PM, Anon Y Mous wrote:
> I haven't tried 2008.11 yet, but my biggest fear is that they are
> going to change the awesome dark blue look of 2008.05 to something
> that's crappy looking.
>
> So far I looked at this link:
>
> http://www.gnome.org/~gman/opensolaris-whats-new
On 31/10/2008, at 3:58 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> But shipping FF3 as default browser undermines efforts like this (in
> your own distros SXCE and Indiana), because on this end you waste 10
> times the resources that others are trying to save piece for piece (in
> their distros). Why don't you mo
On 31/10/2008, at 3:21 AM, James Cornell wrote:
>> I think OpenSolaris isn't intended for production use yet.. and Sun
>> *does* have other versions which are fairly similar *and* offering
>> support contracts. Have you taken the time to contact a support rep?
>> (Sorry I don't know specifics or
Hey,
I've been jiggling around the release notes so that we have some
versioning in the URL namespace, rather than the rather abstract rn3
as we used for 2008.05.
From now on the release notes will look like this -
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/relnotes/MM/plat
On 16/10/2008, at 10:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 10/15/08 11:56, Stephen Le wrote:
>> I just performed an image-update from b98 to b99. On reboot, the boot
>> process stops at a grub prompt, suggesting that my grub configuration
>> got wiped. How can I boot into my system to restore my g
On 3/10/2008, at 10:43 AM, alan mcclellan wrote:
> Ah, I didn't even think to look. Not sure how well that would have
> served my purpose; our system is running on solaris 10 with the
> coolstack packaging of the AMP stack (and my install/admin notes are
> specific to its installation into
On 3/10/2008, at 8:58 AM, alan mcclellan wrote:
> Friend of mine recently set up OpenSolaris and sent me the following
> feedback, which I thought others might be interested in. -alan
Definitely, thanks!
> - So once I got my browser working I googled for "coolstack" and
> went to the Sun do
Hey,
A little while ago I sat down to go through the default bookmarks that
we include in Firefox. The following attached proposal is where I've
got based on a first pass (and some review from a few people I passed
it on to). The aim is to provide a set of useful bookmarks, but
certainly
On 24/09/2008, at 8:40 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
> Jason King wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > wrote:
>>
> Sounds like a perfect use of the group packages ips provides.
> See ss-dev
> or
> gcc-dev as examples:
>
>
>
Glynn Foster wrote:
> Userspace Utilities (compiler, archiving, editors, ...)
This is a difficult section to complete, and very much maps together with the
modernization/familiarity issues. I think the answer is close to what the SFW
consolidation (including PSARC cases in the pipeline) alre
Hey,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> When the time is right, I think a lot of folks are likely to pitch in.
>
> [Particularly if they can be convinced that their doing so is likely to
> be what ensures that their own machines may work ;) ]
>
> It would be good for someone to write up a little t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>> Would it help if that prioritized list was based on a particular
>>> vendor that had the reputation of following specifications closer?
>>> I've been in the room when Matthew Garrett has been politely venting
>>> his frustration within the Linux world, and wonderin
Ian Murdock wrote:
> Marketing folks: We need to come up with a prioritized list of the
> "most popular" laptop models out there. And we need to take into
> account that most popular may vary in different parts of the world.
Would it help if that prioritized list was based on a particular vendor
Gueven Bay wrote:
> Educate them, not copy Ubuntu for Solaris, please.
> Why doesn't anyone understand this?
> Why do we all need flashy installers even when the process is to 90% of the
> steps the same?
Respectfully disagree with a lot of what you've said, sorry.
This is probably going to g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I think SUNWCreq may actually be more than we want. Does anybody know
>> how big it and all of its dependencies is?
>
> Compressed, I believe it's about 90MB as of snv_67 (the numbers that
> Glynn posted were I believe the uncompressed sizes of the packages).
>
> Enc
Shawn Walker wrote:
> Thoughts on using SUNWCrnet + necessary items instead?
>
> Or is the point to get something simple quickly and hence the use of
> SUNWCreq since it is a "known variable"?
I can't speak for engineering, but I think it's good that it's a 'known
variable' - it's been tested,
Shawn Walker wrote:
> I think SUNWCreq may actually be more than we want. Does anybody know
> how big it and all of its dependencies is?
http://www.gnome.org/~gman/metacluster-cluster-mapping.png
Download, and enlarge in your favourite image viewer - it gives a pretty good
idea. From Peter's bl
Sara Dornsife wrote:
> I understand that, and I am all opensourcy myself, but in this case,
> initial conversations with Sun's TM lawyers need to be made by a Sun
> employee. I have the best interests of this community at heart.
I know a lot of people don't know Sara, or have a basic distrust of
Hey,
Tackling one little bit at a time - will reply to some of your other points
separately.
Dave Miner wrote:
> I would suggest that you explicitly *not* work on a package list, and
> instead work on a functionality list that's specific about what
> capabilities the user expects in a "core insta
Glynn Foster wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Glynn Foster wrote:
>> If anyone wants to suggest bits missed, or help provide a list for some of
>> the
>> other functionality, please feel free.
>
> If anyone wants to give this a go (or has core knowledge in a particular
&g
Ian Murdock wrote:
> That said, even longer term thinking is in scope as long as we
> don't get carried away--but that's project management 101. If
> Project Indiana is really an umbrella project, it should be
> producing a roadmap, gathering requirements that can inform
> what projects are the m
Dave Miner wrote:
>> What updates in Solaris require a reboot? For updates that do require
>> a reboot, having the last known good state available in the grub
>> menu would be the way to go here. FWIW, in Linux, we got it down to just
>> the kernel, and even that could be done in place with patch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>> > What updates in Solaris require a reboot?
>
>> I've been spoiled by using the Sun Update manager, so I just reboot
>> when it tells me I need to.
>>
>> I think Ian's question is what types of updates require a reboot or
>> what the criteria was for deciding t
Hey,
Glynn Foster wrote:
> If anyone wants to suggest bits missed, or help provide a list for some of the
> other functionality, please feel free.
If anyone wants to give this a go (or has core knowledge in a particular area),
I'd certainly appreciate input on things like -
S
Hey,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One additional question concerning "Package Management". Is there any
> requirement implied or unstated around a GUI-based package manager for
> Indiana? It wasn't clear if that was intended to be part of PKG-1.
No, I don't believe so - at least for a first relea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Glynn,
>
> I have a couple of questions on the specific requirements below. On
> general question is are the requirements within a section (such as
> "Installation") ordered by priority?
Some of the requirements probably need some thought about the order - especially
On 27/08/2008, at 5:17 PM, Andras Barna wrote:
> some thoughts,
> auto-login: imho it's a good thing (for home users) (/me hates
> pidgins' keyring thingy)
I think definitely for a LiveCD experience. The Fedora prompt sort of
gets in the way of the user experience.
> note: prolly you know but
Hey,
Just playing around with some LiveCD's, and figured I'd send the high-
level notes I made -
Fedora
o Nice bootsplash, and pretty sweet looking animated cursor
o Doesn't auto-login by default it seems
o 24px panel on top and bottom
o Panel objects for Firefox and Evolution, notifica
On 25/08/2008, at 5:33 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it is good to hear this from you, thanks.
>
> But really, I'm asking myself if there is actual interest. Because
> only 2
> or 3 interested users have ever contacted me since 2006. That makes me
> wonder if it was worth it.
It's likely
On 25/08/2008, at 4:48 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> This wonderful community seems to lack every interest in this.
> And if SPARC-Indiana ever ships, it will only work on today's
> "supported" hardware (which is currently limited to the XVR-2500 and
> may even include two additional frame buff
Hey,
On 13/08/2008, at 11:28 AM, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
> Most of the disk space in gnome-themes is used by the icons:
>
> $ du -sk * | sort -n
> 5 LargePrint
> 23 hicolor
> 32 HighContrast
> 32 HighContrastInverse
> 273 HighContrastLargePrint
> 278 HighContrastLar
On 13/08/2008, at 9:57 AM, Brian Cameron wrote:
>
> Glynn:
>
>> I believe the UI spec details the configuration from the OpenSolaris
>> 2008.11 LiveCD - not the additional applications that you can install
>> from the repository. Absolutely agree with you that any installed
>> software should app
Hey,
On 13/08/2008, at 4:32 AM, Brian Cameron wrote:
>
> Calum:
>
> Of all the new applications that is going into the next release,
> I think "xchat" should go into the default Applications->Internet
> menu. Please, please!
>
> Bluefish might be another good choice to add, since we otherwise
> d
On 12/08/2008, at 10:53 PM, Ivan Wang wrote:
>>
>> The iso for build 95 will available via bittorrent
>> very soon. So you
>> should be able to use that.
>>
> Hi Sanjay,
>
> Is b95 based iso only available through bittorrent? or one can
> download it via normal http sites like dlc.sun.com?
Th
On 7/08/2008, at 7:47 AM, Hugo Garcia wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need to reinstall the OS. I noticed the readme at
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/rn3/
>
> where I must do
>
> $ pfexec pkg refresh
>$ pfexec pkg install [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>$ pfexec pkg install [EMAIL PROTEC
Hey,
I just cleaned up, and posted a bunch of new OpenSolaris stuff here -
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/advocacy/mktgdownloads/
includes new fan buttons, and OpenSolaris iPhone backgrounds (for
those who haven't seen them before).
Glynn
On 2/08/2008, at 11:29 AM, Stephanie Brucker wrote:
>
>> - It would be great to detail how to connect to an encrypted network
>>(WEP/WPA) through use of the dladm create-secobj command.
>
> The table at the end of the Network Configuration section has a link
> to documentation for the WiFi
On 2/08/2008, at 11:09 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> In the finding CIFS shares section, wouldn't it be better to call it
> "the
> Nautilus file browser" instead of the "Sun Java(TM) Desktop System
> file
> browser"? I thought most JDS branding was gone in 2008.05.
I'd probably not even use
On 2/08/2008, at 10:17 AM, Kathy Slattery wrote:
>
> I have been leading a group of writers working on a
> companion to the "Getting Started" Guide. The idea
> is to document some useful procedures to help configure
> an OpenSolaris laptop after the OS is installed.
>
> Please take a look at a re
On 30/07/2008, at 10:37 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Glynn Foster wrote:
>> Is having no drivers better than having broken drivers? Agreed that
>> this
>> is a lofty goal and many SPARC systems will be headless anyway.
>> Wonder
>> if it's somethin
On 30/07/2008, at 9:59 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Glynn Foster wrote:
>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/problem_statement/
>
> Some specific comments on pieces in my neck of the woods:
>
>>DSK-4: Systems (including laptops) upon connec
On 30/07/2008, at 5:42 AM, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Glynn Foster
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>
>>
Hey,
While we're already neck deep in development towards producing a
release in November, it seemed like a good idea to start putting
together a problem statement for 2008.11, much like we did for 2008.05.
Back then, the problem statement stood for a set of lofty goals for
what we wanted t
Hey,
On 28/07/2008, at 2:19 PM, Brett wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I installed the dhcp server for opensolaris using "pkg install
> SUNWdhcs" and went to configure it with the following result:-
> -bash-3.2# /usr/sbin/dhcpconfig -D -r SUNWfiles -p /var/dhcp
> dhcpconfig: Can't load library: /usr/sadm
On 16/07/2008, at 12:02 PM, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> It is true that I can download the pkg from the above download page.
> It
> looks like I have no other option. My question is why VirtualBox is
> not
> in the IPS?
No good reason - we're working on trying to get it in as soon as
possible.
On 10/07/2008, at 6:00 AM, Sebastien Roy wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 10:31 -0700, Barbara Lundquist wrote:
>> See important Release Note at:
>>
>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/rn3/
>
> Minor suggestion: Since the people who download OpenSolaris at
> www.opensolaris.
On 10/07/2008, at 5:36 AM, Ken Mays wrote:
> So anyhow, I'd like to see an updated Live CD snapshot for Aug 2008
> of OpenSolaris 2008.x with the newer GNOME 2.22.x release and latest
> ON build 93/94.
There will be in effect 2 ISOs being produced. The re-spin of 2008.05
(planned for August
On 10/07/2008, at 4:04 AM, Abraham Tehrani wrote:
>
> What is the difference between downloading a 650MB CD ISO,
> installing, then
> firing up IPS to download another 1 GIG worth of updates, then
> another X MB
> of extra applications; instead of downloading everything you need in
> one
>
On 8/07/2008, at 4:13 PM, Mike Gerdts wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> I'm not disagreeing with you in any way, j
On 8/07/2008, at 5:56 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
>> So I'd appreciate any thoughts you have in terms of 'development
>> platform' - do you mean C, Java, Perl, Python, Ruby, C#, C++? Or web
>> developer - Rails, Django, PHP, Javascript, ...? What about compilers
>> and IDEs? Which ones? Would you in
On 8/07/2008, at 11:53 AM, MC wrote:
>> OpenSolaris 2008.5 is downright broken as a development platform
>
> If someone outside this list is saying that (they are) then people
> here should be listening.
>
> I suggest a package that reconfigures the system as a development
> platform, and an
On 4/07/2008, at 4:02 AM, Rob wrote:
> Is there any plans to spin a new iso for all of the latest fixes to
> opensolaris? All of the IPS fixes alone are worth a new iso, imho.
We should have an ISO re-spin available sometime around August - a
little unclear yet what fixes will be made, since
On 30/06/2008, at 5:18 PM, Ryan de Laplante wrote:
> I had the impression that no matter what, there will only be two ISO
> releases per year. For everything else we use IPS?
There should be a set of ISOs coming, which will effectively be builds
prior to 2008.11 being officially released. Ide
On 19/06/2008, at 3:30 AM, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:02:21PM +0800, Alfred Peng wrote:
>
>> Not sensitive about font myself. Is this related to that the
>> Firefox is
>> started up remotely?
>
> Probably, but the same problem exists on the local display. Firefox
> 2 is
>
On 18/06/2008, at 5:49 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> that is *wild* because I see this
>
> -bash-3.2# pkg search -r smbd
> en_CA.ISO8859-1: unknown locale
> INDEX ACTIONVALUE PACKAGE
> basename file usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> basename file
On 18/06/2008, at 5:24 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> This "indiana" name thing is just confusing to someone new.
> I want to be able to install this and then call it what it is.
I've actually started to thrown down feelers about losing the Indiana
name from now on. I agree there's a good deal of
On 12/06/2008, at 8:53 AM, Rob wrote:
>>> correct, I installed a new 2008.5 system from cd, ran pkg list >
>>> before.txt, did a pkg install SUNWsvn, did a pkg list > after.txt
>
> Here are my results:
>
> diff /root/before.pkg.list /root/after.pkg.list
[snip]
There's a good chance that the d
On 12/06/2008, at 8:49 AM, Rob wrote:
> I'm sure news of release came up in many internal sun corporate
> meetings, but please point me to a publicly available announcement
> of last weekend's update. Is there a better source for announcements
> then this mailing list that I don't know abou
On 11/06/2008, at 5:17 AM, Mike Gerdts wrote:
> If I am paying for unencumbered binary packages from pkg.sun.com, I
> should have access to the source code used for building those binary
> packages without extra cost. Presumably the access would be in the
> form of a mercurial repository, and/or
On 9/06/2008, at 9:55 AM, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 08:18 -0700, Nick wrote:
>> error6.txt
>> error7.txt
>> error8.txt
>
> Ouch! It's not polite to post megabytes of logs to mailing
> lists. I'm surprised it was let through, mailman normally
> puts long messages like th
On 9/06/2008, at 7:49 AM, Sean Sprague wrote:
> Gilles,
>
>> Just upgraded 2008.05 to 2008.11 ... Update went very well...
>> really... but now, when I enable visual effects, I don't have a
>> window
>> manager anymore. I have to get back to Visual Effects -> None to
>> get a
>> proper window
On 3/06/2008, at 5:23 AM, Alfred Peng wrote:
> Totally agree. We really need to have a process/roadmap ready to make
> sure SFE specs are in good shape. The sfe mailing
> list(https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgbuild-sfe-devel)
> seems to be a good start point that could address the c
On 5/05/2008, at 9:32 AM, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:35:56PM +1200, Rob Giltrap wrote:
>
>> http://dlc.sun.com/torrents/info/os200805.iso.torrent
>
> Is there a reason this isn't on the website?
None, and I agree it should be listed. I'm trying to get a few of the
other mir
On 5/05/2008, at 7:01 AM, Paul Fisher wrote:
> 9 out of 10 times the online documentation pages are returning as
> blank.
> Is there a problem, or is this just load (and can we fix that too)?
> Just as an example, this link:
> http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/IPS/snap3.html
Yeah, unfortun
I'm proud to announce that the first release of the OpenSolaris (TM)
operating system, OpenSolaris 2008.05 is now available to download
http://www.opensolaris.com/get/
As you'll notice, we've also launched a new site for users, www.opensolaris.com
.
OpenSolaris 2008.05 is a Live CD, allow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Good idea - I'd do so if time permits.
Okay - let me know if you don't. I can easily do it tomorrow or over the weekend
at the summit.
Glynn
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opens
Hey,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Indiana gang,
>
> The 1st batch of Release Notes for OpenSolaris 2008.05 are posted at:
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/rn3/
>
> This batch includes bug numbers:
> 1633 from Jan
> 1156, 1472, 1045, 1333, 1685 from Ethan
> 1
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> OpenOffice.org package gone from IPS? Thanks
Nope, 2.4.0 is on pkg.opensolaris.org for RC3 installs.
Glynn
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> Perhaps we should move to the opensolaris.com forum to help doing the
> debugging:
>
> http://forums.opensolaris.com/index.jspa
>
> (The new forum seems to be better designed and more functional than the 'ol
> Jiva forum, IMHO.)
That site is still in beta test, so I'd
Mario Goebbels (Webmail) wrote:
>> As I mentioned in my earlier reply, based on the MD5 checksum that
>> Stephen quoted, the image on the torrent should be the non-LZMA
>> version. Are you seeing a noticable degradation in all areas or just
>> from an installation perspective?
>
> It wasn't so
Hey,
Marcelo Leal wrote:
> Hello all,
> Ok, now (i think), i understand the full concept aroud project Indiana
> and all the "problems" that were generated with the project
> creation... I mean, "OpenSolaris" will be a SUN's distribution, not a
> "community" distribution!
> I think that is reall
Mario Goebbels wrote:
>> I'm not thrilled about the colors. I find the overall
>> shades are cold,
>> gloomy.
>
> As I posted in website-discuss: Is there a version with the "fiery" color
> scheme? I think it'd look nicer, because they're warm colors.
Sun has decided to go with the multi-color
1 - 100 of 270 matches
Mail list logo
