On 8/24/07, Steve Francisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip!]
> If the command line doesn't have a way to cause $_GET to be populated,
> then what other way of invoking PHP could I use?
> -- Steve
Steve,
You'd need to transpose the $_GET variables from the request to
$argv variables via
On 8/24/07, Steve Francisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip!]
> Thanks Daniel, I can certainly do that in Java without much trouble,
> however I was hoping to avoid needing to do things in each php file to
> convert argv into $_GET. I want to be able to serve standard PHP
> without modifying each
> On 02/10/2007, Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > One important thing we forgot to discuss is to drop VS6 support fin
> > 5.3 and finally move to VS2005.
> >
> > It has a couple of side effects but it is a one time job and should
> > make our life easier on windows from 5.3 and up.
On 10/15/07, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.potentialtech.com/cms/node/48
>
> Hope that article doesn't come across as too harsh, but I really feel
> like it needed to be said.
>
> --
> Bill Moran
> http://www.potentialtech.com
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
On 10/24/07, John Mertic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, remove any lines in your php.ini that reference those files.
>
> John
>
> On 10/24/07, sivasakthi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > When ever i have executed the php files it throws the following warning
> > message,
> >
> >
>
Ken,
This same issue was referred to back in 2004 on the php.net site.
I just looked it up and the post can be found by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from 9 September, 2004, on this page:
http://us.php.net/errorfunc
On Nov 23, 2007 12:32 AM, Ken Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I complet
On Nov 28, 2007 5:49 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> >
> > On 28.11.2007, at 00:28, Pierre wrote:
> >
> >> One word: transparency.
> >>
> >> It is amazing how it helps to discuss things instead of acting like that.
> >
> > I find it amazing how oblivious t
On Nov 29, 2007 6:03 AM, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>
> > I do not care for IBM problems. Not at all. If people want to commit
> > they can do it in their free time. If IBM now thinks they have to make
> > PHP suitable for their own stuf
On Nov 29, 2007 12:01 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > this thread popped up. It almost seems like the beginnings of a
> > long-term hostile takeover plan, beginning quietly in the shadows.
>
> Come on... Really.
>
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
> [EMAIL PR
On Nov 29, 2007 1:09 PM, David Coallier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2007 12:49 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So, what, exactly, is the fuss all about?
> >
> > Richard, the problem with a CLA (moral quibbles apart) is it prevents any of
> > the core contributors doing
On Nov 29, 2007 5:56 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it is not more important. 99.9% of PHP users don't care what process
> we have, they care about how well PHP works for them. If we had best
> process in the world but no support for what people need - people won't
> use PH
On Nov 30, 2007 10:13 AM, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Dan Scott wrote:
>
> > In that case, you should:
> >
> > 1) Have a legal entity that you can assign copyright to (PHP Group and
> > PHP Documentation Group are not legal entities and therefore cannot
> > hold
On Nov 30, 2007 10:37 AM, Jay Pipes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> With PHP, the situation is different. The foundation of PHP was laid by
> Rasmus Lerdorf together with a large group of independent developers,
> and the central parts of PHP underly a different license and copyright
> regime
On Dec 3, 2007 4:01 PM, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Was hoping to send this off earlier but I was travelling for the past
> week and had very limited email access.
>
> As promised in the past few weeks we have spent a significant amount of
> time in reviewing the garba
That looks great, Andi.
Thanks.
On Dec 3, 2007 4:38 PM, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry about that. Does the attached PDFed screenshot work for you?
>
> Andi
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daniel Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Markus,
If for some reason the PDF attachment didn't come through to you
on the list, let me know and I'll upload it to one of my servers for
you to download and use, as well.
On Dec 3, 2007 4:40 PM, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That looks great, A
On Dec 3, 2007 4:49 PM, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>
> > Sorry about that. Does the attached PDFed screenshot work for you?
>
> No, as you can't attach files here
>
> Derick
>
> --
> Derick Rethans
> http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no
On Dec 4, 2007 2:46 AM, Ronald Chmara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd have to (sadly) ask that anything that slows down PHP by 5%, to
> improve performance for programmers that, uhm, "leak" or otherwise
> gobble RAM, that they, uhm, refactor their code as professional
> programmers.
In the ge
On Dec 7, 2007 9:51 AM, Nathan Rixham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In-Built PHP Functions for parsing of basic arithmetic and if possible
> fraction to decimal and decimal to fraction
PHP already handles half of what you're looking for by default.
> $arithmetic_string = "3*5";
> echo arith($a
On 20 November I finally sent a request for a PHP CVS account
(danbrown), but still haven't received any acknowledgment. However, I
realized that I was having problems with my email intermittently, with
some messages not routing through properly. Does anyone here know how
I could check on the
On Dec 12, 2007 10:33 AM, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20.11.2007 21:57, Daniel P. Brown wrote:
> > Assisting with maintenance of the php.net site, documentation,
> > and bug fixes, as well as further developing the runtime and
> > including bundled packages (perhaps such as the TT
I would say, if anything, there are two viable choices that
wouldn't adversely affect the PHP project:
1.) Have the Internals list read-only by all but (a)
developers/contributors and (b) people granted permission after having
posted useful information via the General list.
2.) Probab
On Dec 13, 2007 10:19 AM, Sean Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >2.) Probably a better idea, just click that DELETE button on any
> > emails you don't feel like reading or responding to. I find that, in
> > a case study performed by myself just now, it takes me about a
> > half-second to ac
On Jan 5, 2008 3:48 PM, Stefan Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> >> typing into PHP, even if it is optional. Passing $_REQUEST['age'] to a
> >>
> > that $_REQUEST['age'] has been checked for numeric before the functio
>
> would you please not use $_REQUEST in any of your examples? $_REQU
On Jan 6, 2008 5:06 AM, Stefan Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
> > It may be off-topic for the initial post, but I disagree
> > wholeheartedly with the above statement, Stefan. There are
> > innumerable reasons where $_REQUEST would be much more economic than
> > writing out a
On Jan 10, 2008 9:39 AM, Sam Barrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 14:56 +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> > So you reject scalar type hinting because it isn't type casting and
> > can therefor confuses newbies - but scattering seemingly random
> > brackets around your code (to s
On Jan 11, 2008 10:30 AM, Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -1
>
> Readability degrades quite a lot.
+1 (b)
Readability will only degrade as much as the coder allows it to.
Besides, I don't get the impression that array() is going to
disappear, only that another option is to be
On Feb 5, 2008 3:23 PM, Pierre Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
> functions in HEAD/php6 but returning always FALSE.
Personally
+1
--
Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix Geek
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Devel
On Feb 5, 2008 3:26 PM, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2008 3:23 PM, Pierre Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
> > functions in HEAD/php6 but ret
On Feb 5, 2008 5:46 PM, Mike Willbanks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I know they've been marked "deprecated" and all, but, really, what's
> > the cost/penalty to having a couple functions around for legacy apps?
> >
>
> Then we will continue to be at the same old issue of they exist, people wi
Bah. You're right. I glanced over it.
Guess my Russian's not as good as I thought it was to miss a city
name like that.
On Feb 7, 2008 10:43 AM, Vesselin Kenashkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> location: г. Москва
>
> in translation: city of Moscow
>
>
If people want to SPAM about a seminar, why not at least mention
where it's going to be held? :-\
2008/2/7 Аленка <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Навыки эффективности. Умение управлять собой и временемДата проведения
> семинара: Одиннадцатое - двенадцатое февраля 2OO8 г.
> Продолжительность: 2 дня
>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 21:28, Klaus Silveira wrote:
> I have noticed that master.php.net has been offline for a few days now,
> resulting in a failure to login at the PHP Wiki. Are you guys having this
> same issue?
It had been going up and down, yes, and now it's completely down.
We're work
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 06:04, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
> judging from the lack of interest I guess you are right.
> I will remove the cvs/cvsup subdomain from our zone file, and the cvsup.php
> file (any any other cvs(up).php.net reference from the codebase, and I cc'ed
> the systems@ list, so that
Greetings, all;
This coming Monday, 16 April, 2012, between the hours of 18:00 and
20:00 EDT (22:00 to 00:00 GMT), the one of the primary php.net servers
will be undergoing a critical preventative maintenance operation. In
this two-hour maintenance window, we do expect a period of
interru
Just a reminder, see the below message.
On Apr 13, 2012 3:43 PM, "Daniel Brown" wrote:
>Greetings, all;
>
>This coming Monday, 16 April, 2012, between the hours of 18:00 and
> 20:00 EDT (22:00 to 00:00 GMT), the one of the primary php.net servers
> will
d/or https://bugs.php.net/.
Thank you.
On Apr 16, 2012 6:15 PM, "Daniel Brown" wrote:
> Just a reminder, see the below message.
> On Apr 13, 2012 3:43 PM, "Daniel Brown" wrote:
>
>>Greetings, all;
>>
>>This coming Monday, 16 April, 2012, betwee
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 18:13, Kris Craig wrote:
>>
> Yeah one of the problems that really frustrates the hell out of me is that,
> after I've answered a question or responded to an objection, somebody new
> jumps in and raises the exact same issue. When I tell them to read earlier
> in the threa
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:30 PM, freeone3000 wrote:
> I'm working with a third-party PHP extension that makes a call to
> zend_auto_global_disable_jit. However, in PHP5.4.5, there is no
> zend_auto_global_disable_jit available, nor is it in its traditional
> header. Commenting out all zend_auto_gl
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Does anybody know who is responsible the snaps.php.net machine? It seems
> to be serving 5.4 builds under then name of php-trunk and that confuses
> people. Not only we don't have "trunk" as such since the move to git,
> people expect
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Maciek Sokolewicz
wrote:
>
> NNTP works great! The only pain in the ass is that it's hellishly slow and
> very very often times out, making the reading of longer threads (like this
> one) take... ages...
> Perhaps it could be mirrored / load distributed as well? Da
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://snaps.php.net/ only have php 5.3 and 5.4 snapshot.
>
> I think it will be great to also have 5.5.
David had sent me an email about that a couple of days ago, and
I'd said that I would add the snaps the following day, but mus
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 8:47 AM Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, Ben Ramsey wrote:
>
> > If you use TweetDeck, you can grant access to others, without needing
> > to pass around the credentials.
>
> Yes, that is exactly how we are using it.
I'm presuming the credentials were chang
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> As per Derick’s idea, we can arrange a webinar for those interested in
> better understanding how it works. Note that this will not be a webinar
> for the faint of heart – opcode caches are complicated pieces of software;
> Attendees should
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Seva Lapsha wrote:
> PHP is a collective mind. Any dictatorship would mean a degradation for it.
> If you don't like how it's managed, there is an easy path:
>
> 1. Earn authority.
> 2. Propose a change.
> 3. Implement it.
> 4. Maintain it.
>
> Start with 1.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:25, Rodrigo
Saboya wrote:
>
> But I think the changelog link is broken =P
This will depend on your local mirror. While I've just been in
touch with the mirror maintainers around the world, it may still take
an hour or so before it shows live in your area.
A lit
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 16:30, Hannes
Magnusson wrote:
>
> Now that 5.3.0 is out, are you looking into fixing run-tests.php or all tests?
>
> Like I warned about; if you enable any of these features in your
> php.ini and then run the test suite.. there are only a handful of
> tests that actually pa
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:40, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On behalf of Ilia (so the subject typo won't hide the RC3 from testers):
>
> The second release candidate of 5.2.12 was just released for testing
> and can be downloaded here:
Just semantics, but wouldn't this then be the *third* release can
2010/6/11 Jesús Espino :
> Hi, i ask a week ago for a SVN account for Pear projects, but nobody
> has reply me.
>
> It's the correct list, i have to ask in another one??
You asked on 3 June[1], last Thursday. Sometimes it takes several
days or weeks (or months), so you would normally just hav
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:12, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
> btw: why can't we see the status changes in the Changes tab at the bugreports?
> it would be an interesting to check how many bugs were first marked as
> bogus then re-opened and fixed.
You can check here to see the email dispatched when
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 21:12, Daniel Mcdonald wrote:
> Maintaining the PHP Documentation, as I have advanced PHP knowledge aswell as
> my native language is English (also know a few other EU languages which could
> help with translations etc.). I've contributed notes before to php.net, and
> h
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 21:24, Scott MacVicar wrote:
>
> using a name like "admin" in your email headers isn't going to be very
> receptive.
I was thinking the exact same thing. Glad not to be the only one. ;-P
--
Network Infrastructure Manager
Documentation, Webmaster Teams
http://www.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:50, Daniel Jänecke wrote:
>
> Well, isn't the problem here more people asking on IRC rather than using
> a search engine before? Renaming will not solve that.
In this case, one might argue that it would. Instead of "what's a
T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM?" you would have,
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 06:47, Richard Quadling wrote:
>
> And probably all sane, rational people will agree with you (and me).
>
> It's the loonies I worry about!
The person who submitted that is a "mongoid." The term they were
trying to be funny about is "mongoloid," which is a racial
class
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 20:47, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi,
[snip]
> Please not I'm not requesting to do it now and here, only trying to
> get a feeling/poll about git usage.
You might recall several conversations on this during the period
where Gwynne was migrating us from CVS to SVN in 2008/09.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 16:56, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> Can't say I feel strongly about it, but I have a feeling that unless we
> change our versioning scheme a slight bit, we'll be stuck in the 5.x realm
> for a very long time (and I do think it actually reflects badly on the way
> the language
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 14:36, Felipe Pena wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm here again to presents another proposal, which adds support for
> instantiating a class and calling its methods and accessing its properties
> on same command.
>
> Example:
>
>
> class bar {
> public $x = 'PHP';
> }
>
> class foo
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 15:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
> You have to wait unzil the TTL is over
> Jesus why is the TTL so hughe?
>
> lxr.php.net. 61221 IN A 94.23.222.92
>
> [ha...@srv-rhsoft:~]$ dig A lxr.php.net @NS2.EASYDNS.COM
> lxr.php.net. 86400 IN CNAME sp2.php.net.
> s
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 21:00, Tommy Pham wrote:
>
> Here are the results after some further tests for the same platform:
>
> * max float value: 1.7976931348623E+308
> * min float value: 9.8813129168249E-324 <<
> floatval('1.00e-323') weird ...
>
> PHP wil hang when the value
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:42, Martin Herrman wrote:
>
> I already had --disabled-all. I have now tested with -Os instead of
> -O2 which results in a 2.8MB executable. So that helps a bit :-)
Try running `strip` on there to take out the excess symbols.
--
Network Infrastructure Manager
Doc
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 05:11, Richard Quadling wrote:
>
> Considering the hack of Hannes' credentials a while ago, can we trust
> that the above message is REALLY from Hannes?
>
> Hmm.
>
> Just spreading some fud in this world of calm.
He was discussing the same thing in IRC yesterday, so eve
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 06:05, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
>
> expose_php = Off?
I think what he and others mean is that they want the option to
leave the logo, credits, et cetera, completely out of the build at
compile time.
--
Network Infrastructure Manager
http://www.php.net/
--
PHP I
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 05:38, Sebastian Beyer
wrote:
> Translating the documentation
Into...? If you're undecided, we could use more people on the
Klingon translation team.
--
Network Infrastructure Manager
http://www.php.net/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To u
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 08:47, Nam Gi VU wrote:
> It is convenient to have a trailing comma when defining an array - so as
> easy to add/remove code to add/remove an entry to the array
>
> array(
> 'key00' => 'value00',
> 'key01' => 'value01',
> 'key02' => 'value02',
> ...
> )
>
> I su
On Feb 19, 2008 2:09 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really like what Stefan did here with his traits RFC. Very solid
> work, even if there are still some people not convinced if they want
> this feature in, I have seen little complaints about the way this
> proposal wa
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Lokrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I am not sure here is the right place to mention this, but
> I still think it will be cool, if there is some spell checking
> before posting news on php.net. There are mistakes like
> the word 'Addded' -> per
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Eugene San <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I want to raise a discussion on subject that is very important for PHP
> usage on Embedded platforms.
>
> I am myself working on projects where we use PHP to manage embedded
> devices. Everything was fine but
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Google Summer of Code sponsors students to work on Open Source
> projects over each summer. This RFC introduces guidelines and goals
> involving how we handle the SoC process.
[snip="important info"]
Philip (or
> Philip Olson wrote:
> > As for where the mentor SoC money goes, I think it finds its way
> > towards random PHP user groups.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The money goes directly to the students. PHP as a project does not take
> any money.
> T
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Alain Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It appears that my server bounced a mail from one of the servers that manages
> this list.
>
> This was because 216.92.131.4 is in a black list at dynablock.njabl.org
>
> Someone might want to check.
[snip!]
Looks
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Google just announced the final assignments for their Summer of Code
> program for this year.
> On behalf of the PHP project I'd like to welcome our students and give
> you some general information about the
Of interesting note: the list rejected my earlier (second) reply
to your message, Johannes. It claimed the Google BlogSpot URL was a
SPAMMY URL.
--
Dedicated Servers - Intel 2.4GHz w/2TB bandwidth/mo. starting at just
$59.99/mo. with no contract!
Dedicated servers, VPS, and hosting from $2.
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> start 326616
> GET 327256
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> POST 327516
> POST 327588
> POST 327652
> POST 327712
> POST 327892
> POST
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Richard Quadling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If not having the OS option means more windows bugs will be fixed as the
> core-devs won't know if it is *nix or windows, then don't ask for the OS.
> (He he).
Please, Rich. Even Microsoft isn't capable of that!
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm with Derick here. We should push out new releases when there are security
> issues
As am I. The EOL announcement itself justifies the release:
"We will continue to make critical security fixes available on
Just a quick note to whomever did the mail server configuration:
After a [enhancement pill name here] SPAM message "from" me (not
really, but you know what I mean) hit the Internals list and bounced
back, I saw the 550.
"550: we're manly enough already"
Nice. That made my mornin
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Pierre Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Lars Strojny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi everbody,
>>
>> regarding my mail from yesterday, I've also created an RFC for the new
>> error level.
+1
Sorry, I thought I'd already
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at the
> point where it might actually have some benefit to us, do we have some
> volunteers who have some time to try converting over the repository and al
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd love to see this conversion. Let's make sure we get enough folks to
> volunteer to check the history of our source trees although we should in
> any case keep the CVS one around for browsing "just in case"...
Is thi
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:15 AM, Richard Quadling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As a windows user my observations/opinions are ...
taken with a grain of salt. ;-P
Isn't discussion about how to add on to SVN and which tools will
be better-suited for development a decade from now cou
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Barry Carlyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was suggested that students write about what they have done and what they
> aim to achieve by the end
Can you name specifically three things you've learned during the
first half of the summer that you didn't know be
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Barry Carlyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) working with object orientated properly, writing classes and the like,
> this is my first time using classes that I have written,
> 2) working with version control, git and cvs, I publish to my git local
> repo, and then
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Pierre Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I strongly disagree, for two reasons:
>
> 1. We are going to release an alpha3, that's the perfect time for such change
> 2. The OB code is messy right now, Mike's work cleaned it up and makes
> it more maintainable. 5.3 is
Hannes,
I think both Thiago and Elizabeth are correct. Call me old-hat: I
prefer CVS but I'm well aware that it's a daunting task to learn
that new technology for people who would otherwise not use it. In
fact, most projects - including PHP - are moving away from CVS, in
favor of SVN
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was hoping to have at least 30 respondees at this stage, but actually have
> 29 (and that includes Hannes' abstention). However, to keep y'all up to
> date, here's where we're up to with Greg's proposals.
Sorry for comi
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Chris Stockton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm going to stop this tally at 50 responses. That should be enough to show
>> us where people generally are coming from.
There are about six total concurrent threads on this right now.
Would it make sense to create
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Josh Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/18 Keryx Web <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Triple colon as in suggestion 1 and 2 is a readability nightmare - yes in
>> both suggestions.
>
> Is that why you voted for 3? Because triple colons are hard to read?
Is that
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is the same as just making internals@ read-only. Once we have an
> internals-core, many core people will just unsubscribe from the internals
> list. I know I probably would. And once the core developers no longer
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Hannes Magnusson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Read the whole thread before posting please:
>
>> "external" patches and "general" discussions would still be on the
>> internals@ list, as it would be the main discussion list.
I have been reading the entire thre
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 16:26, Brian A. Seklecki
wrote:
>
> All:
>
> Is anyone interested in adding POSIX 1003.1-2001 gethostname(2) support? I'm
> interested in sponsoring a small contract development initiative.
>
> I need something more reliable than $_ENV[]. Not all shells export
> $HOSTNAME
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:42, Kenan R Sulayman wrote:
> Hey Folks!
> I've got a error in compiling PHP ( 5.3+ ) (or executing the compiled PHP
> bin).
> It occurs with including php_xdebug.dll (alt. known as xDebug Server ).
>
> When executing the compiled binary of PHP.
>
> Any suggestions?
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Peter Cowburn wrote:
> On 5 December 2017 at 13:57, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
>
> Furthermore, while some have karma to approve VCS accounts, they may not
>> have karma to grant karma – so approving the accounts without granting
>> actual karma does not really ma
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> On Di, 2018-01-02 at 11:49 +0100, Nikita Popov wrote:
>> li...@rhsoft.net, who have recently been
>> aggressively derailing
>
> He was blocked in 2012 already:
>
> https://externals.io/message/59395#59421
I hadn't even noticed this t
93 matches
Mail list logo
