Is there any client implementing it? I'd like to do some tests, but so
far I've found no clients with this extension
--
Fabio Forno,
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
F
ooks. On the ejabberd mailing
list I think you'll find all the help you need
http://www.process-one.net/en/wiki/ejabberd_events_and_hooks/
And if you are adventurous enough you can write them from external
applications http://blog.bluendo.com/ff/ejabberd-hooks-with-twisted
bye
--
Fabio For
: bosh using the phone HTTP apis or implementing the
whole HTTP requests ?
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=2
liability, but a new and better method (xep-0198) is
being defined for this purpose.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
___
ps Gajim too?
>
Well, so there is something wrong since I see nothing. Let's go to bug hunting!
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabber
Hi, does anybody know a client supporting pep for avatars. We have
implemented it for a gateway we've written and our mobile client, but
we'd like to do some interoperability test before releasing
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.b
s the olny way to make it
happen, then there is time for finding better solutions)
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php
ken from the perspective of 4/5 years of XMPP evolution, XEP-72
should be superseded by something better, such as io-data. XEP-72 just
replicates the typical HTTP request/response message pattern, where
XMPP has few advantages.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jab
.net/browse/EJAB-499;jsessionid=9A8016C904ED74DB757864E788AB1D39?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Achangehistory-tabpanel
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabber
ken in general (problems while flushing)
and in all instances of ejabberd I've tested removed xep-138 after
starttls
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> Bug reports are your friend... :)
On some servers the report is already there ;)
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
__
t; compression), TLS (with TLS compression), TLS (with XEP-0138 compression)
> and TLS (with TLS and XEP-0138 compression - SHOULD NOT happen, but might)
Yep, it is so. Nevertheless no server appears to offer xep-138 after starttls
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.b
for the w3c style ;)
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscri
ly exclusive. When activating tls
compression must be performed using tls compression.
M-Link should support it (at least the trunk version) and thanks to
Dave Cridland we are going to test it.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber
Hi,
is there any server which supports TLS and compression together? In
ejabberd it seems feature that will added in feature releases, in
other servers I don't know. Is there anybody aware of a server
implementing it, so that we can test with out mobile client?
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluend
roubles, unless we are so
confident that we can fight spam much (much and even more much) better
than email.
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.o
n as [EMAIL PROTECTED] without the need to
> complement it with http://smoku.openid.pl/
Yes, the problem is that any integration I've seen so far includes in
some way the JID in the url, thus making it possible to automatically
harvest it
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.
rcase without supplying any means to the
application for discovering which is the correct one to use.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
main has a different port, which can be discovered through s2s
srv records).
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SRV records for all this domains you should be fine. In the
> srv record you specify the s2s and c2s ports.
It can work also with different TLDs
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and it can login to your
server:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
(You should just be careful to reply attacks, if the connection is
encrypted there aren't problems, otherwise it should be better to ask
a challenge to the gateway before)
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ssion is gone, the token is useless.
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
oblem is that your
credentials must pass through the relay server
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lback)
(now we're going off topic, if you are interested you may ping via jabber)
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
his way you could let the server do what it does better, routing
messages, and use your favourite language for controlling its
behavior.
Now it's up to server developers to say whether this makes sense or
not. As user I'd like it a lot.
Bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
point was just: privacy should never be a stopper for
designing a service, just a requirement, then let users choose.
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> > OK, let's put some information about this on the wiki page, then. :)
>
> Done:
>
> http://wiki.jabber.org/index.php/Summer_of_Code_2008#JMS-to-X
uld be technical solutions (e.g. a local pubsub service which
anonimously subscribes to remote nodes and relays them)
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> look into the different aspects of reading and publishing (atom) feeds
> in general would be worthwile i think.
This is what we can have in a reasonable time, but for the future I'd
bet on direct support on IM clients or XMPP integration in browsers
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ect could concentrate on
just replicating the JMS functionalities on pubsub
- define naming of topics: with jms I can only subscribe to topics of
the server I'm connected to, while on XMPP you can subscribe to any
pubsub service
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:18 AM, Joe Hildebrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Fabio Forno wrote:
>
> > The only XMPP specific part I'd require is the creation of the initial
> > dictionaries for the most used namespaces, since EXI would
for our case
2) client & server developers that could use it
The only XMPP specific part I'd require is the creation of the initial
dictionaries for the most used namespaces, since EXI would be useless
without them.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e encoding of
unknown namespaces as EXI already prescribes.
I think that such a library (in Java or C), with no client/server
integration, could be in the scope of SoC and it would be very useful
for both client and server developers in order to start experimenting
stream optimizations.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tarting coding and
it's difficult to devise a project with controllable deliverables, the
only self contained project I've in mind could be a first
implementation of EXI
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
prefixes, so it doesn't understand
> query like the following: xmlns:v='jabber:iq:version'> (but routes them happily).
This is just an implementation issue of a specific server and I'm
surprised hearing of it, since also basic XEP examples such as this
one use them:
ht
/www.xml.com/pub/a/1999/09/expat/index.html
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which needs to be Tweaked a bit now.
Shouldn't be easier to port some existing c library such as expat?
Writing XML parsers from scratch is easy at all.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re useful a dump of the xml you are sending (from
the code it's very difficult to understand what it has really been
sent)
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g problems, but we'll
fix them asap)
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
essing the whole class of problems I've listed
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt;
> So, it is more work to check it, but it can be done.
Usually, for example in j2me it's not possible, and, I think, more in
general in java and in other high level frameworks
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ta was sent. If the connection is broken
the application gets an error only when sending a further packet (or
packets if the buffer isn't full), but it has no knowledge where the
previous stanza was actually received or not. XEP-198 and a BOSH
transport instead allow preventing these situations.
ll these things (and others I surely forgot) make XMPP on of the best
choices for asychronus messaging in distributed architectures,
especially when thousands and more of simultaneous online clients are
involved.
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Bluendo srl
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bluendo.com/en/products
Konstantin Klyagin wrote:
> Anyway, can someone recommend me a component that is being
> installed on one server is by default accessible for users from
> another server?
Mu-conference I think. I joined to many rooms in different servers
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mar
Ulrich B. Staudinger wrote:
> Sure, components may talk to users on other servers.
>
Provided they have a FQDN (intra-server communications work even without it)
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Try Jabber http://www.jabb
Gaspar, Al (EES) wrote:
> So how does one get an invitation to try gmail and check out Google Talk?
+1 offering invitations ;) anybody interested can mail fabio.forno at
gmail.com
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Try Jabber h
enough. Their client is far less attractive than
other clients (VoIp a part, i haven't tried yet) and so they need
something more. Imho S2S is just one of the aspects: an open protocol
would allow to implement 3rd party services (pubsub, notifications,
chats, any kind of bots, ...) without th
ny of those servers if nothing changes.
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Try Jabber http://www.jabber.org
___
jdev mailing list
jdev@jabber.org
http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
ent, (b) use of the Google Talk Service or
> Client, or (c) access to the Google Talk Service or Client.
[...]
So what? They set up a server and they don't want you to use for
commercial purpuses. They also wrote a client and they don't want you to
resell it. All perfectly legit
client.py, line 422 at _rawDataIn:
client.py, line 427 at _rawDataOut:
hello google talk
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Try Jabber http://www.jabber.org
___
Chris Chen wrote:
> From what I can tell, after TLS negotiation, Google supports the
> following mechanisms:
>
> PLAIN
> X-GOOGLE-TOKEN
Yes now I can get the mechamisms too. I've tried using plain, my gmail
account and talk.google.com as realm with no success :/
--
Fabio
DIGEST-MD5
PLAIN
Instead I get only an empty tag and the client hangs ...
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Try Jabber http://www.jabber.org
___
jdev mailing list
jdev@jabber.org
http://mail
Also Slashdot is reporting the news
http://slashdot.org/articles/05/08/23/1313229.shtml?tid=217&tid=215
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Try Jabber http://www.jabber.org
___
jdev mailing
lecom/weblogentry_view
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Try Jabber http://www.jabber.org
___
jdev mailing list
jdev@jabber.org
http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
those restrictions.
(If you are stuck with clients, you could also write your specialized
C2S module with your own traffic shaping policies)
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
*** Employer line for sale ***
Phone: +39 011 2276 102 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pubsub subscriptions, where node visibility is configurable
will work, then if you want to protect messages from sniffing you can
use TLS connections or pgp on each message, servers support them
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
*** Employer line for sale ***
Phone: +39 011 2276 102 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED
message sequence number
and acks in your application.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
*** Employer line for sale ***
Phone: +39 011 2276 102 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jdev mailing list
jdev@jabber.org
http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
e not
since they are under the direct control of the server administrator.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica e Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 2276 102 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROT
just like c2s, and
the messages will get delivered correctly.
Thanks, it works ;)
I can only send messages for existing users, but it is enough.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica e Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phon
the name of the component name changes, I really
don't understand what's worng.
Are there other sources for better learning elements?
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica e Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone:
ing
it to get rejected.
Which suggests that your servers you are trying to test with are not
setup correctly and thus not even able to start a dialback attempt, can
normal users on your server send messages ok?
Yes, they can.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip.
onsible for, and dialback is
working for.
As I've written it does not start any dialback attempt.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica e Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 2276 10
em, and no packets passed though a s2s stream. The s2s component
refused to send the message
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica e Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 2276 102 - JabberId: [EMAIL
send message with rpc-like calls, the
only solution with the present server is to keep a connection open for
any possible user of this server. Am I right?
(I'd like to avoid to authenticate each time a message is sent)
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Au
s evil for client entities,
but not for components (components are under direct control of system
administrators, and if a spammer runs its own server, he or she could
send any kined messages...).
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica e Informatica
C.so Duc
error message:
xmlns='http://jabberd.jabberstudio.org/ns/component/1.0'
from='s2s'>
from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]' type='error'>
ciau
Any suggestion?
Thanks
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Auto
13:22:29 2004 mio.c:418 write_dump writing data:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Service Unavailable
Any hint?
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica e Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 564 7091 - J
t know whether
this was due to the client (not under my control) or the server.
Now I'm looking for someone using Exodus here around in order to sniff
some raw XML ;)
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (I
t know whether
this was due to the client (not under my control) or the server.
Now I'm looking for someone using Exodus here around in order to sniff
some raw XML
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (I
Hi,
I'm analyzing some messages logged by a component received with the
option "archive", and I see that all the messages with a composing event
are duplicated. Has anyone an idea of why this is happening?
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed I
he latest jabberd of the 1.4.x series with a default
configuration file.
Thank you for your help
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 564 7137 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
I should update the JEP 72, adding that clients
offering soap services should be connected using the soap resource.
(CC to the standard-jigs ML)
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011
ould go on from
where we left.
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 564 7137 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTE
hout risking of having too crowded or empty branches
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 564 7137 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jdev mail
e examples.
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 564 7137 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.or
raries that for elements
have methods such as sendAndWaitForResponse, which are blocking until
the answer of the last sent arrives.
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 564 7137 - J
ht packets of type from a node to
another. With my surprise I've discovered that the arriving order was
rather random. Is this behavior documented somewhere, or it may depend
on server implementations?
Thanks for your help.
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip
Jan Niehusmann wrote:
Just *.jabberserver.tld. IN CNAME jabberserver.tld. would work, wouldn't
it?
Yes it should work, I didn't think of it.
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phon
ntails.
At present this may be the solution for my needs: a server just bots
implemented as clients, with special karma settings for c2s
communications, almost equal to s2s ones (I can set up all the servers I
want, but living in a big organization is not easy to have all the FQDNs
I'd li
out wehther it is possible or not.
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 546 7137 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL
As far as I can understand components names must be in the form
"mycomponent.myjabberserver" forcing me to have a qualified domain name
in order reach them from other servers. Is it true or am I missing
something?
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Aut
Ulrich Staudinger wrote:
Hi Fabio,
basically the karma settings shape bandwidth for connected clients. To
create a service (which a bot is) which doesn't suffer from karma
restrictions, think about creating a server component.
I've understood, but I don't know whether server components con int
le in this case).
Any reaction or suggestion?
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabb
83 matches
Mail list logo