Is there any client implementing it? I'd like to do some tests, but so
far I've found no clients with this extension
--
Fabio Forno,
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http
. On the ejabberd mailing
list I think you'll find all the help you need
http://www.process-one.net/en/wiki/ejabberd_events_and_hooks/
And if you are adventurous enough you can write them from external
applications http://blog.bluendo.com/ff/ejabberd-hooks-with-twisted
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl
for curisioty: bosh using the phone HTTP apis or implementing the
whole HTTP requests ?
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info
.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr
Hi, does anybody know a client supporting pep for avatars. We have
implemented it for a gateway we've written and our mobile client, but
we'd like to do some interoperability test before releasing
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
there is something wrong since I see nothing. Let's go to bug hunting!
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http
, then there is time for finding better solutions)
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
the perspective of 4/5 years of XMPP evolution, XEP-72
should be superseded by something better, such as io-data. XEP-72 just
replicates the typical HTTP request/response message pattern, where
XMPP has few advantages.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f
in general (problems while flushing)
and in all instances of ejabberd I've tested removed xep-138 after
starttls
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http
=9A8016C904ED74DB757864E788AB1D39?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Achangehistory-tabpanel
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org
are mutually exclusive. When activating tls
compression must be performed using tls compression.
M-Link should support it (at least the trunk version) and thanks to
Dave Cridland we are going to test it.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
for the w3c style ;)
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
___
JDev mailing list
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
Bug reports are your friend... :)
On some servers the report is already there ;)
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: f...@jabber.bluendo.com
fight spam much (much and even more much) better
than email.
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
JDev mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq
Forum: http
] without the need to
complement it with http://smoku.openid.pl/
Yes, the problem is that any integration I've seen so far includes in
some way the JID in the url, thus making it possible to automatically
harvest it
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED
to the
application for discovering which is the correct one to use.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be fine. In the
srv record you specify the s2s and c2s ports.
It can work also with different TLDs
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, which can be discovered through s2s
srv records).
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, a sequence of
cryptographically computed authentication tokens should be the best
solution. When you register with the gateway you pass you jid and the
one-time auth token, then the gateway uses it for connecting with the
server and, after the session is gone, the token is useless.
bye
--
Fabio
from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x xmlns=xmpp:roaming
jid[EMAIL PROTECTED]/jid
sign./sign
/x
/presence
(You should just be careful to reply attacks, if the connection is
encrypted there aren't problems, otherwise it should be better to ask
a challenge to the gateway before)
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D
the relay server
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and use your favourite language for controlling its
behavior.
Now it's up to server developers to say whether this makes sense or
not. As user I'd like it a lot.
Bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are interested you may ping via jabber)
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
naming of topics: with jms I can only subscribe to topics of
the server I'm connected to, while on XMPP you can subscribe to any
pubsub service
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
This is what we can have in a reasonable time, but for the future I'd
bet on direct support on IM clients or XMPP integration in browsers
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pubsub service which
anonimously subscribes to remote nodes and relays them)
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
OK, let's put some information about this on the wiki page, then. :)
Done:
http://wiki.jabber.org/index.php/Summer_of_Code_2008#JMS-to-XMPP_bridge
superfast ;)
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D
a service, just a requirement, then let users choose.
bye
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:18 AM, Joe Hildebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 18, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Fabio Forno wrote:
The only XMPP specific part I'd require is the creation of the initial
dictionaries for the most used namespaces, since EXI would be useless
without them.
Using
, could be in the scope of SoC and it would be very useful
for both client and server developers in order to start experimenting
stream optimizations.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
) client server developers that could use it
The only XMPP specific part I'd require is the creation of the initial
dictionaries for the most used namespaces, since EXI would be useless
without them.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
deliverables, the
only self contained project I've in mind could be a first
implementation of EXI
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Shouldn't be easier to port some existing c library such as expat?
Writing XML parsers from scratch is easy at all.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/1999/09/expat/index.html
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are sending (from
the code it's very difficult to understand what it has really been
sent)
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, then send STARTTLS to become encrypted )
Any one have pointers to a library for J2ME that supports this
switching mode ?
With Bouncy Castle you can upgrade a socket to TLS (we are using it in
our mobile client: it's not out only for packaging problems, but we'll
fix them asap)
--
Fabio
sending a further packet (or
packets if the buffer isn't full), but it has no knowledge where the
previous stanza was actually received or not. XEP-198 and a BOSH
transport instead allow preventing these situations.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL
it, but it can be done.
Usually, for example in j2me it's not possible, and, I think, more in
general in java and in other high level frameworks
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Konstantin Klyagin wrote:
Anyway, can someone recommend me a component that is being
installed on one server is by default accessible for users from
another server?
Mu-conference I think. I joined to many rooms in different servers
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber
Ulrich B. Staudinger wrote:
Sure, components may talk to users on other servers.
Provided they have a FQDN (intra-server communications work even without it)
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Try Jabber http://www.jabber.org
/
client.py, line 427 at _rawDataOut:
message to='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'bodyhello google talk/body/message
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Try Jabber http://www.jabber.org
of the Google Talk Service or
Client, or (c) access to the Google Talk Service or Client.
[...]
So what? They set up a server and they don't want you to use for
commercial purpuses. They also wrote a client and they don't want you to
resell it. All perfectly legitimate.
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto
if nothing changes.
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Try Jabber http://www.jabber.org
___
jdev mailing list
jdev@jabber.org
http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
. Imho S2S is just one of the aspects: an open protocol
would allow to implement 3rd party services (pubsub, notifications,
chats, any kind of bots, ...) without the need to re-engineer the
protocol or pay expensive licenses.
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp
Gaspar, Al (EES) wrote:
So how does one get an invitation to try gmail and check out Google Talk?
+1 offering invitations ;) anybody interested can mail fabio.forno at
gmail.com
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Try Jabber http
/weblogentry_view
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Try Jabber http://www.jabber.org
___
jdev mailing list
jdev@jabber.org
http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Also Slashdot is reporting the news
http://slashdot.org/articles/05/08/23/1313229.shtml?tid=217tid=215
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Try Jabber http://www.jabber.org
___
jdev mailing list
jdev
='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-sasl'
mechanismDIGEST-MD5/mechanism
mechanismPLAIN/mechanism
/mechanisms
Instead I get only an empty feature/ tag and the client hangs ...
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto Superiore Mario Boella
Jabber ID: xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Try Jabber http
Chris Chen wrote:
From what I can tell, after TLS negotiation, Google supports the
following mechanisms:
PLAIN
X-GOOGLE-TOKEN
Yes now I can get the mechamisms too. I've tried using plain, my gmail
account and talk.google.com as realm with no success :/
--
Fabio Forno, PhD
Istituto
and acks in your application.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
*** Employer line for sale ***
Phone: +39 011 2276 102 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jdev mailing list
jdev@jabber.org
http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
of pubsub subscriptions, where node visibility is configurable
will work, then if you want to protect messages from sniffing you can
use TLS connections or pgp on each message, servers support them
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
*** Employer line for sale ***
Phone: +39 011 2276 102 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED
restrictions.
(If you are stuck with clients, you could also write your specialized
C2S module with your own traffic shaping policies)
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
*** Employer line for sale ***
Phone: +39 011 2276 102 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jdev
not
since they are under the direct control of the server administrator.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica e Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 2276 102 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED
c2s, and
the messages will get delivered correctly.
Thanks, it works ;)
I can only send messages for existing users, but it is enough.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica e Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 2276
,
but not for components (components are under direct control of system
administrators, and if a spammer runs its own server, he or she could
send any kined messages...).
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica e Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy
message with rpc-like calls, the
only solution with the present server is to keep a connection open for
any possible user of this server. Am I right?
(I'd like to avoid to authenticate each time a message is sent)
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica e
, and no packets passed though a s2s stream. The s2s component
refused to send the message
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica e Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 2276 102 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED
is
working for.
As I've written it does not start any dialback attempt.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica e Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 2276 102 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED
it to get rejected.
Which suggests that your servers you are trying to test with are not
setup correctly and thus not even able to start a dialback attempt, can
normal users on your server send messages ok?
Yes, they can.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica
='jabber:client'
from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]' type='error'
error code='503' type='cancel'
service-unavailable
xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas'/
/error
body ciau /body
/message
/route
Any suggestion?
Thanks
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D. - Research Assistant
Politecnico di
write_dump writing data: iq
xmlns='jabber:client' type='error' to='[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Psi'
id='aaffa' from='msn.kamin.polito.it'
query xmlns='jabber:iq:register'
username[EMAIL PROTECTED]/username
password./password
nick/
/query
error code='503'Service Unavailable/error/iq
Any hint?
--
Fabio
(not under my control) or the server.
Now I'm looking for someone using Exodus here around in order to sniff
some raw XML
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 564 7137 - JabberId: [EMAIL
to the client (not under my control) or the server.
Now I'm looking for someone using Exodus here around in order to sniff
some raw XML ;)
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 564 7137 - JabberId
Hi,
I'm analyzing some messages logged by a component received with the
option archive, and I see that all the messages with a composing event
are duplicated. Has anyone an idea of why this is happening?
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so
.
For this reason perhaps I should update the JEP 72, adding that clients
offering soap services should be connected using the soap resource.
(CC to the standard-jigs ML)
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone
to the recipient.
As server I use the latest jabberd of the 1.4.x series with a default
configuration file.
Thank you for your help
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 564 7137
on from
where we left.
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 564 7137 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
.
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 564 7137 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo
/
This is documented here:
http://www.jabber.org/ietf/draft-ietf-xmpp-core-02.html#anchor3
Thank you. My doubt derived from some libraries that for iq/ elements
have methods such as sendAndWaitForResponse, which are blocking until
the answer of the last sent iq/ arrives.
--
Fabio Forno - PhD
packets of type message/ from a node to
another. With my surprise I've discovered that the arriving order was
rather random. Is this behavior documented somewhere, or it may depend
on server implementations?
Thanks for your help.
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip
this may be the solution for my needs: a server just bots
implemented as clients, with special karma settings for c2s
communications, almost equal to s2s ones (I can set up all the servers I
want, but living in a big organization is not easy to have all the FQDNs
I'd like)
--
Fabio Forno - PhD
Jan Niehusmann wrote:
Just *.jabberserver.tld. IN CNAME jabberserver.tld. would work, wouldn't
it?
Yes it should work, I didn't think of it.
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011
As far as I can understand components names must be in the form
mycomponent.myjabberserver forcing me to have a qualified domain name
in order reach them from other servers. Is it true or am I missing
something?
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed
it is possible or not.
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
Phone: +39 011 546 7137 - JabberId: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Ulrich Staudinger wrote:
Hi Fabio,
basically the karma settings shape bandwidth for connected clients. To
create a service (which a bot is) which doesn't suffer from karma
restrictions, think about creating a server component.
I've understood, but I don't know whether server components con
).
Any reaction or suggestion?
--
Fabio Forno - PhD Student
Politecnico di Torino - Dip. Automatica ed Informatica
C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24 - 10129 Torino (Italy)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo
77 matches
Mail list logo