Re: [leaf-devel] openswan fix

2006-06-28 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello list, Openswan-2.4.5 ipsec.lrp package in CVS updated with the fix: http://leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/20/ Eric > Hello list, > > > > Issuing the command "ipsec auto --status" while there is no tunnel will > trigger a uclibc only

Re: [leaf-devel] openswan fix

2006-06-29 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Nataneal, >> I looked at the link and it appears to be a very old bug. >> > > So its fixed in newer versions of openswan? > No, the version used by Bering-uClibc is 2.4.5 which is the latest stable version released only a few weeks ago and still has the bug. Eric Usi

Re: [leaf-devel] apkg -u (upgrade)

2006-06-29 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Cedric, Very interesting! I still have some problems understanding how it exactly works ;) Why is the following piece added? else tar -zxpf $pth create_sha1 $pkg fi Regards Eric > > > I've implemented a simple upgrade co

Re: [leaf-devel] apkg -u (upgrade)

2006-06-29 Thread Eric Spakman
ems understanding how it exactly works ;) > Why is the following piece added? > > else tar -zxpf $pth create_sha1 $pkg fi > Regards, Eric Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easi

Re: [leaf-devel] apkg -u (upgrade)

2006-06-29 Thread Eric Spakman
nough to your script, but if the sha1sums and .list are correct a backup will remove the files that no longer exist. > For the moment, it's mainly useful for developers > who want to rapidly test their new version of a particular package without > rebooting or manually editing th

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-29 Thread Eric Spakman
ffect some other LEAF distro's... Eric > According to the latest news, it is being reported that the FSF is > forcing all distributions to carry all source code, including "spinoff" > distributions. For example, that means that MEPIS must carry the source > code to every

Re: [leaf-devel] beckup menu disappered

2006-06-30 Thread Eric Spakman
omplete buildenv, as Kp wrote. But if you want to use uClibc-0.9.28, your buildtool.cfg may need some small changes for the new config system. If you send me your buildtool.cfg file, I can make the changes for you if you like. Regards, Eric Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support w

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-06-30 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Mike, >> >> If you provide software to download the source then the link it points >> to _must_not_be_altered_. >> >> This is pretty sensible. >> > > Eric, > That's the way I understood things also (linking to up-stream source was > permis

Re: [leaf-devel] new tagged 2.4.2

2006-07-02 Thread Eric Spakman
ding cof files that usually >live in /etc ? (asterisk has many) > Just add them to asterisk init.d script. Instead of using the tagged 2.4.2 with uClibc-0.9.20, why not use the latest in CVS with 0.9.28? >Regards, >Andrea Fino > Regards, Eric Using Tomcat but need to do

Re: [leaf-devel] new tagged 2.4.2

2006-07-02 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, I don't know enough of CVS to see what goes wrong. You can try a fresh checkout of buildtool in a different directory. EricS >Eric > >Eric Spakman wrote: >... >> >> Instead of using the tagged 2.4.2 with uClibc-0.9.20, why not use the >> lat

Re: [leaf-devel] Docs

2006-07-03 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Paul, AFAIK pdf generation is still not ready... But you can checkout the XML document files from CVS: http://leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/leaf/doc/guide/ Eric > I went looking around the site for downloadable copies of the manuals for > Bering-uClibc. I found a link to a supposed

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
a lot about it. Although with a quick look there doesn't seem anything wrong with it, neither in sources.cfg nor in buildtool.cfg.. Eric > Hi Folks > > > according to KP's suggestion I focused on 2.4.2 > > - checking out from CVS was a breeze > > > I modif

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
be in a corrupted sources.cfg, where the setserial directory > line was concatenated with the previous line. > > Will check if this is on the CVS itself > This is very well possible, I seem to remember that I fixed something like this some time ago. Maybe after the 2.4.2 tag Eric

Re: [leaf-devel] Docs

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Paul, I fully agree, but unfortuanatly I can't do anything about it. I hope Mike can give the status of PDF (and/or HTML) generation. Eric >> -- "Eric Spakman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello Paul, >> > >> AFAIK pdf generation is

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
ot;broken" sources upstream and we don't have the time for it... Eric Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Ger

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
t alinea, the process is automatic now but the text still applies. > Thanks for the explanation > > > Will a new run fix this or will I have to set the referenced manually? > A new run should fix that. > > Erich > Eric Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support w

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
> Buildtool checks the link to the right uClibc loader when you start it (either 0.9.20 or 0.9.28), it's not possible to do two simultanious builds for two different environments. So don't ;)) Eric Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff don

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Don't know where that (double path) /staging/usr/bin//usr/bin/cc: comes from, doesn't do that on my host Eric > Eric > > > feels like a never ending story, herre the latest from the HEAD checkout > > build source/package: wlan-ng --

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Op Di, 4 juli, 2006 3:31 pm schreef Erich Titl: > Eric > > > feels like a never ending story, herre the latest from the HEAD checkout > > > -D__LINUX_WLAN__ ../shared/p80211types.c ../shared/p80211metamsg.c > ../shared/p80211metamib.c ../shared/p80211meta.c mkmetadef.c &

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, > The problem is in the linux-wlan-ng-0.2.3 directory, where CC is > redefined in config.mk > > luna > grep /usr/bin/cc * config.mk:HOST_CC=$(HOST_COMPILE)/usr/bin/cc > config.mk:CC=/data/leaf/bering-uclibc/devel/latest/src/bering-uclibc/build > tool/staging/usr/bin//usr/bin/cc > config

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, I just checked-in a slightly different version of wlan-ng's buildtool.mk, this is more in line with other sources. Can you check this one to see if it solves your problem? Eric Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly wit

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-05 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, I will take a look at it, although I can't remember seeing this in my test... Eric > Eric > > > some more information. Although wlan-ng appears to compile correctly, not > all is well in config.mk > > CROSS_COMPILE=/data/leaf/bering-uclibc/devel/latest/src/

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-06 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Erich, I tought about the same, but the strange thing is that HOST_COMPILE is empty with the latest commit and $CC points to the crosscompiler (the 2.4.2 tag should be set to current HEAD). But I will take a look at it this evening. Erc > Hello > > > following up to my compile problems wit

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi everybody, > > some of you may have seen my odyssey getting a buildenv for uClibc up and > running. With lots of help and patience by Eric Spakman I finally got the > CVS HEAD to compile without barfing on my SuSE 9.2 . > > Now the 2.4.2 tagged release is not as gentle, as

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-08 Thread Eric Spakman
me (which would be the implication if we create a 2.4.3 tag in CVS). Eric Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Ge

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, >I will download the current 2.4.2 tonight and see how it runs on my >environment. > Thanks! Eric - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, I think it's a temporary problem on shorewall's main site. I will keep an eye on it and change to an other site if the problem persist. Thanks for reporting. Eric >Eric > >Eric Spakman wrote: >> Hi Erich, >> >>> I will download the current

Re: [leaf-devel] buildtool problems

2006-07-10 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, The problem on the shorewall site is solved now, the www.shorewall.net link works correct again. Cheers, Eric Op Zo, 9 juli, 2006 11:40 am schreef Erich Titl: > Hi Eric > > > Eric Spakman wrote: > >> Hi Erich, >> >> >> I think it's a tempor

Re: [leaf-devel] new config system

2006-07-14 Thread Eric Spakman
les will be saved in the moddb package, so the concept of "locally added modules" doesn't exist anymore, the modules database is a repository of all kernel modules. > > Regards, > Cedric > Regards, Eric ---

Re: [leaf-devel] new config system

2006-07-14 Thread Eric Spakman
.cfg > That will also work. >I will rename buildtool generated moddb to something like stdmoddb on the >iso. > I think the ISO package list file in buildtool (to generate the CD) still has the moddb listed, I will change it so it wil be ad

Re: [leaf-devel] new config system

2006-07-14 Thread Eric Spakman
d/filelist >The ISO simply contains all packages found in $PKGDIR (no hard wired list) > Ok, so an exception should be made for the moddb package. > >Regards, >Cedric Regards, Eric - Using Tomcat but need to do

Re: [leaf-devel] new config system

2006-07-15 Thread Eric Spakman
; are not really useful there. > Agree, although they can be usefull as backup (initrd) if you ever replace the initrd on the floppy. > > Regards, > Cedric > Regards, Eric - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Nee

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-07-18 Thread Eric Spakman
So I still don't see a problem... To answer David: I think this whole story only applies for distros still being maintained (with a limit of 3 years). Eric - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join Source

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-07-18 Thread Eric Spakman
y on other >projects to do it for you. > Even if you are right, it would only count for the linux source. We only use binutils and gcc to build the toolchain, we don't provide gcc or binutils binaries. I don't think it would ever be a proble

Re: [leaf-devel] new config/backup system

2006-08-19 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, >Eric & KP, > >Looks nice, been trying to catch up on things... > >Couple of questions, while we're doing the 3.0 flag day, would it be OK >if we made the package dependancies explicit, not part of the help file? > That would be a good idea. > >The

Re: [leaf-devel] new config/backup system

2006-08-21 Thread Eric Spakman
[ all elf files ] | while read elffile ; do for so in `readelf -d > $elffile |\ > grep NEEDED |\ sed 's/.*Shared library: //; s/\[\(.*\)\]/\1/'` ; do > > dep=`find_lrp_that_has_file $so` add_dependency $dep done done > > So you

Re: [leaf-devel] perl for Bering uClibc 2.4.2?

2006-08-24 Thread Eric Spakman
ges/uclibc-0.9/20/testing/ It depends on the libm.lrp package. Eric - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Downl

Re: [leaf-devel] webconf backup packages

2006-08-25 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Nathan, >Bering uClibc team, > >Eric alerted me to the broken backup packages webconf. (sorry) > >While looking at it, I have a quick question re the new backup system. > >Should it be possible to backup moddb/configdb to any of the destinations >in /var/lib/lrpkg/p

Re: [leaf-devel] webconf backup packages

2006-08-25 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Nathan, Thank you very much! > Hi Eric, > > > I just posted the source and binary versions of webconf.lrp and > webconf.lwp. Your changes to lrcfg.back.cgi were heroic. :))) > I decided to > shortcut the whole thing and make webconf (backup, at least) work with

Re: [leaf-devel] webconf backup packages

2006-08-26 Thread Eric Spakman
x27;t think this is intended. > Did you also used the latest webconf.lwp package? The daemon start/ stop script is part of the lwp package. >kp > Eric - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web

Re: [leaf-devel] runtime fixup of /etc/inittab for serial consoles

2006-08-26 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, Hmmm, not sure. I find it a bit of a clutch. What happens if an user edit the inittab for other changes like mgetty? I prefer specific configdb/sylinux.cfg for different hardware where also other changes can be done. Eric > >--Apple-Mail-3-25159442 >Content-Type: multip

Re: [leaf-devel] runtime fixup of /etc/inittab for serial consoles

2006-08-26 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, A real /etc/inittab is always present, it's part of the etc.lrp package... Eric >Look at the script. If a real /etc/inittab is present, it doesn't do >its magic. >It only does it if the proto is present and /etc/inittab is not. > >This is one of the most

Re: [leaf-devel] runtime fixup of /etc/inittab for serial consoles

2006-08-26 Thread Eric Spakman
certain types of hardware, so it's just a matter of copying the right configdb package to the storage media and of you go. Eric - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done

Re: [leaf-devel] runtime fixup of /etc/inittab for serial consoles

2006-08-27 Thread Eric Spakman
can also set some other standard options, like selecting the right modules in /etc/modules, some network options and comment out the normal ttys. I will keep your idea in mind. > Best and thanks, > > Paul > Regards, Eric ---

Re: [leaf-devel] latest cvs checkout does not compile

2006-08-28 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, It's probably your version of jade. Try to change libusb buildtool.mk file like this: Change: ./configure) to ./configure --disable-build-docs) Eric > Hi > > > Maybe I blew it again, altough I thought upgrading my development > environment was easy > > - I

Re: [leaf-devel] latest cvs checkout does not compile

2006-08-28 Thread Eric Spakman
-build-docs) >> > This helped, rerunning buildenv was not sufficient. > I will make this change in CVS also. > > BTW. does anyone know why S/MIME signed messages are _not_ showing up on > the list? > > Thanks > > > Erich > Eric -

Re: [leaf-devel] Shorewall 3.3.0

2006-08-28 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Tom, That's great news! Thank you very much! Eric Spakman > I have opened up the 3.3 development thread. > > > http://www1.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/development/3.3/shorewall-3.3.0 > ftp://ftp1.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/development/3.3/shorewall-3.3.0 > >

Re: [leaf-devel] olsrd

2006-09-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Adrian, I took a look at the sourcecode and don't see any reason why it shouldn't work. The only thing is that the code is not GPL-ed. Eric > > Does anyone know of someone who may have packaged the routing package > olsrd for Leaf, or can think of a reason why it migh

Re: [leaf-devel] runtime fixup of /etc/inittab for serial consoles

2006-09-05 Thread Eric Spakman
ful. A few things that could be done in a HW specific configdb/moddb in the case of a WRAP f.e. is setting the serial console, disabling normal consoles, selecting the wd1100 module with the right parameters and the correct NIC module. Eric -

Re: [leaf-devel] initial 3.0 beta feedback

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
ke a look. But I think it is in CVS somewhere... >webwlan was not either > Not sure, wil take a look. (I think there is a webwlan.lwp somewhere in CVS). >should we be saving /var/lib/random-seed in configdb? > It is saved. Eric --

Re: [leaf-devel] patch: enable traceroute in busybox

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, I don't want to enable traceroute in busybox, because it don't work out of the box with shorewall and it adds size. Traceroute can also be done from any host connected. I rather have a separate traceroute package. Eric >? busybox-1.2.1 &g

Re: [leaf-devel] dynamic generation of dropbear keys if not present

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, Good idea, will take a look. Eric >Please consider applying this patch to dropbear. It will dynamically >create the dropbear host key files if they don't exist. This is EXTREMELY >useful for bringup from scratch. If you don't have access to the serial >port

Re: [leaf-devel] dynamic modules building idea

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
ystem. Eric >I don't know how popular this is going to be, but I'll toss it out anyway. > >For 99% of leaf users, storage is no longer ultra critical. This idea >is not meant to eliminate the current way of doing things (for those >folks who really are tight on secondary

Re: [leaf-devel] example 'build modules' engine...

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, A few comments: -We do have tar -X, so you can use that. Take a look at the apkg upgrade code for an example. -The hardcoded name of the modules repository is somewhat ugly, maybe you can do something with "uname" to find the kernel version. Eric > Here's what I

Re: [leaf-devel] initial 3.0 beta feedback

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, >should we be saving /var/lib/random-seed in configdb? > Ok, understand the question. Yes, it should be saved ;-) Eric - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuf

Re: [leaf-devel] patch: enable traceroute in busybox

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
ke the idea, it could also be used for the CD-ROM image instead of using all kinds of mount, umount and dir commands in /etc/modules. Eric - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff d

Re: [leaf-devel] yet another functionality request for 3.0 - ancillary file storage .lrp

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Spakman
If there's no official behavior for this currently (I could be blind, > I'm cutting over to 3.x at high speed and not reading docs all that > well), would you mind if I created something? Do you have opinions about > how it should behave? > Eric ---

Re: [leaf-devel] xl2tpd does not compile

2006-10-25 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Are you sure you're using the latest checkout of apps/linux? The linux/if_pppol2tp.h file is part of the pppol2tp-linux-2.4.27.patch.gz patch in the linux CVS directory. Eric > Hi Folks > > > it appears that the xl2tpd package as distributed on CVs does not > compi

Re: [leaf-devel] xl2tpd does not compile

2006-10-25 Thread Eric Spakman
ent) and copy new files for privately changed packages to the source directory. > cheers > > Erich > Eric - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-

Re: [leaf-devel] xl2tpd does not compile

2006-10-25 Thread Eric Spakman
ewpoint it's somewhat more structured than having everything in one directory, but it's indeed not consistent with how it gets downloaded. Eric - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securit

Re: [leaf-devel] ez-ipupdate?

2006-11-23 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, There is no reason for it, that's why it's just available ;-) http://leaf.sourceforge.net/bering-uclibc/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=12&MMN_position=32:32 ezipupd.lrp Eric > Is there a reason the ez-ipupdate package for 3.x is

Re: [leaf-devel] Documentation in Shorewall Configuration Files

2006-11-23 Thread Eric Spakman
re shipping. > > There is no shorewall version 5, the current Stable Release version is 3.2.6 which is what we use. The development release is version 3.3.5, which will become 3.4.x when stable. When this version is stable, that o

Re: [leaf-devel] ez-ipupdate?

2006-11-23 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, ;-))) > Doh, I'm an ass. I found it just after I sent the note out... I was > thinking, "I know it was in 2.x..." > > - > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel a

Re: [leaf-devel] Documentation in Shorewall Configuration Files

2006-11-23 Thread Eric Spakman
r documentation will not match the code we're shipping. >>> >>> >>> >> There is no shorewall version 5, the current Stable Release version is >> 3.2.6 which is what we use. The development release is version 3.3.5, >> which will become 3.4.x when stab

Re: [leaf-devel] Documentation in Shorewall Configuration Files

2006-11-23 Thread Eric Spakman
plicate the shorewall documentation on the LEAF site? >> Isn't it much simpler to just provide a link to Tom's documentation? >> > > Eric, > Aren't we discussing the Shorewall man page? > > > The man page ships with Shorewall, but we strip it for si

Re: [leaf-devel] Documentation in Shorewall Configuration Files

2006-11-23 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Mike, > > Eric, > Ah. We are in agreement then, or I think so. Do you still plan on a > "shordoc" package? > I don't know, a router/firewall is not really a good platform to read documentation... Maybe Erich's suggestion will work, creating some sort of webco

Re: [leaf-devel] small glitch in ssh/scp in bering-uClibc

2006-11-28 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, I suppose you are talking about openssh, not dropbear ssh/scp? No problem to add that value to the ssh_config file, will do that later today. Eric > Hi Folks > > > Starting with bering-uclibc3.x I observed an error when trying to use > ssh/scp. > > debug2: calli

Re: [leaf-devel] small glitch in ssh/scp in bering-uClibc

2006-11-29 Thread Eric Spakman
o suppress the warning without disabling ipv6 support in the config. > I have never seen this > happen on a 1.x glibc based Bering. I must admit, I never explored the > ssh_config file neither. > Because 1.x glibc Bering didn't support ipv6 at all > cheers > > Eri

Re: [leaf-devel] QBox - Back under active development

2006-11-29 Thread Eric Spakman
es on your own. Btw, what's wrong with shorewall's QOS implementation? Regards, Eric > Hello all, > > > I just wanted to touch base and let you know I'm starting a cycle to > get QBox updated, and will be using Bering-uClibc 3.0. > > I may actually branch

Re: [leaf-devel] QBox - Back under active development

2006-11-29 Thread Eric Spakman
e is and will never be "easy", you always need to know what you are doing. But having a good UI and convenient installation is a big pre. > Best of luck either way, > > > Paul > Eric - Take Surveys.

Re: [leaf-devel] ulogd does not use new logfile after rotation

2006-11-30 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Both logfiles (shorewall.log and ulogd.log), served by ulogd are rotated by there own cron scripts. ulogd.log once a week and shorewall. log every day. In both cron scripts ulogd is reloaded. Eric >Hi Folks > >again, I should learn to change subject, sorry > >in my att

Re: [leaf-devel] ulogd does not use new logfile after rotation

2006-12-01 Thread Eric Spakman
about the problem you have with logrotating? >cheers > >Erich Eric - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on

Re: [leaf-devel] ulogd does not use new logfile after rotation

2006-12-01 Thread Eric Spakman
you don't use shorewall you don't need ulogd. Eric - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT

Re: [leaf-devel] ulogd does not use new logfile after rotation

2006-12-01 Thread Eric Spakman
figdb. > The correct place to change this is the ulogd cron.daily file, lrp.conf is for configuration of the logfiles served by syslogd. I will look for an option to pass the ulogd.conf logfile parameters to the cron.daily script, so this will handled automatically (like done in mhttpd). > chee

Re: [leaf-devel] ulogd does not use new logfile after rotation

2006-12-01 Thread Eric Spakman
s done now in the lastest mhttpd(s) packages in CVS or create some sort of API that will pass logfile names and daemon names used in a package to a common cron script for reloading and logrotating. > cheers > > Erich > Eric -

Re: [leaf-devel] ipt_CONNMARK.o

2006-12-19 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, I just checked rc1 and it's in the modules tarball: 2.4.33\kernel\net\ipv4\netfilter\ipt_CONNMARK.o Eric > It looks like ipt_CONNMARK.o is not in the Bering*_modules.tgz file > in the iso image. > > Can we please get this in as part of the standard build before >

Re: [leaf-devel] Oops

2007-01-06 Thread Eric Spakman
> > Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/ > http://www.geocities.com/paulgrogers/ > Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." > (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL > :-) > Eric

Re: [leaf-devel] Perl

2007-02-25 Thread Eric Spakman
ewall interpretation, the combination would be at least somewhere between 400 and 500 kbyte (compressed). That's a lot more than the current 90 kbyte... Eric - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT

Re: [leaf-devel] Perl

2007-02-25 Thread Eric Spakman
ckage. > I don't see a lot of embedded distributions in this list, only sharp, symbian and wince but no linux based. Eric - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay

Re: [leaf-devel] rt2400

2007-02-27 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, This is always of interest, please send the patch. Eric > Hi folks > > > I added the rt2400 module to the ralink directory. I have a patch for > ralink if this should be of interest. >

Re: [leaf-devel] libstdc++

2007-03-04 Thread Eric Spakman
.lrp But the library is also pretty big, more than 400 kbyte... > -- > Mike Noyes > http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ > SF.net Projects: leaf, sitedocs > Eric > > > - > Take Survey

Re: [leaf-devel] libstdc++

2007-03-04 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Mike, > > Eric, > Thanks for the information. If I have this straight, either choice is > about the same resource wise. > > microperl 350 kbytes libstdc++ more than 400 kbyte > Not entirely, the microperl package (tar.gz) is 350 kbyte (without probably needed modules) th

Re: [leaf-devel] libstdc++

2007-03-05 Thread Eric Spakman
mat) is > 64062 bytes. > > > Sum of uncompressed filesize is 182kb. > That's definitly worth looking at. But the software doesn't seem to be very actively developt... Is it a dropin replacement for the gcc libstdc++ libraries? > > > Natanael Copa >

Re: [leaf-devel] RTL8111B driver

2007-04-05 Thread Eric Spakman
import your files? > The easiest way is to checkout the /leaf/src/bering-uclibc/contrib/ directory, create the r1000 directory, cvs add that directory. Copy the new files to it, cvs add them and do a cvs commit. > Thanks > > > Erich > Eric

Re: [leaf-devel] RTL8111B driver

2007-04-05 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Mike, > > Erich, > Disregard my last post. You omitted a path 'bering-uclibc' from the > import command. > > http://leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/leaf/src/bering-uclibc/apps/ > The correct path is: leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/leaf/s

Re: [leaf-devel] Again: dhcpcd still seems to malfunction in beta2

2008-01-07 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Do you still have "CONFIG_FEATURE_IFUPDOWN_IP_BUILTIN=y" enabled in busybox? This shouldn't be because we are using the full version of the iptools. Eric > KP > > > KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb: > >> On Saturday 05 January 2008 22:27:29 Erich Titl wr

Re: [leaf-devel] xntp problem with busybox 1.8.2 (was dhcpcd still seems to malfunction in beta2a)

2008-01-07 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Strange, neither the version of ntpd or iptools has changed between the two betas and the initrd basicly only contains busybox. So I wonder what can cause this problem... besides an ntpd init script (busybox change in init applet?) or a busybox command used in the ntp scripts.. Eric

Re: [leaf-devel] xntp problem with busybox 1.8.2 (was dhcpcd still seems to malfunction in beta2a)

2008-01-07 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Erich, Because it works for KP, did you make any change to the ntpd package or did you compile your own? Eric >> >> >> Strange, neither the version of ntpd or iptools has changed between the >> two betas and the initrd basicly only contains busybox. > > Yes,

Re: [leaf-devel] Intel e1000 network drivers

2008-02-18 Thread Eric Spakman
ome sourceforge intervention. We can't remove directories from CVS ourselves. > Erich > Eric - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.c

Re: [leaf-devel] etc.local

2008-02-25 Thread Eric Spakman
in local.local (local.lrp), >> that's where that package is meant for. Or to have a specific package >> with the added files and a .local file. > > That is the way I do it right now, my local.local file is constantly > growing though. > Or just add the etc/netwo

Re: [leaf-devel] etc.local

2008-02-25 Thread Eric Spakman
ckage is meant for. Or to have a specific >>>> package with the added files and a .local file. >>> That is the way I do it right now, my local.local file is constantly >>> growing though. >>> >> Or just add the etc/network to local.local >> > >

Re: [leaf-devel] etc.local

2008-02-25 Thread Eric Spakman
l, which holds files and >> directories to be backed up. So this should not hurt, or does it? > > I meant .conf not > Nope, it's really .local. Using .conf would not cover all files that might change. Eric --

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering uClibc with Kernel 2.6

2008-03-11 Thread Eric Spakman
kernel and you have to do a switch_root to give init the control and do some other housekeeping. Eric - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering uClibc with Kernel 2.6

2008-03-11 Thread Eric Spakman
is beyond the physical memory size of the system, because of the upper limit. This isn't possible with the simple initramfs fs. Eric - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R)

Re: [leaf-devel] Alpha Test File Server Add-On Packages - Where Should I Put Them?

2008-03-19 Thread Eric Spakman
added to leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/leaf/src/bering-uclibc/contrib/ which you can do with your sourceforge account. Or you can send me the sources and I can add it. It would be a pity if the setup would get lost. Eric > Hi, > > > I've been experimenting with using Bering-uClibc as a

Re: [leaf-devel] The packaging of Haserl.

2008-03-30 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Mats Erik, I have no objection in putting these binaries in a seperate package. Especially if it makes maintaining easier. Regards, Eric > Hello folks, > > > I will the next few days commit a major overhaul of Webconf, > resulting in new versions of at least five webcon

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: Suggested Change to Default Configuration for dhcpcd

2010-10-25 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello David, The reason for that was that the dnsmasq is serving as dns server, it gets its upstream servers from /etc/dhcpc/resolv.conf See also: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/buci-dnsmasq3.html http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/buci-network3.html Eric 2010/10/25 davidMbrooke >

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: module options for auto-loading

2010-11-15 Thread Eric Spakman
David, If I remember correctly, the option "Check tainted module" is needed. But I can't remember which modules needed it. Please check before commiting that change. Eric > > Hi Andrew, > > I won't promise that *nothing* is broken, but everything I tried work

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc4: module options for auto-loading

2010-11-15 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Kp, That's it ;) Eric 2010/11/15 KP Kirchdoerfer > Am Montag, 15. November 2010, 14:09:29 schrieb Eric Spakman: > > David, > > > > If I remember correctly, the option "Check tainted module" is needed. But > I > > can't remember which modul

[leaf-devel] Fwd: making heyu.lrp ???

2014-03-08 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello list, Can someone help Jean-Roch with this package? I don't have a development environment at the moment. Thanks, Eric Begin forwarded message: *From:* jeanro...@users.sf.net *Date:* 8 maart 2014 04:24:23 CET *To:* espak...@users.sf.net *Subject:* *making heyu.lrp ???* *Reply-To:* j

<    1   2   3   4   5   >