He died in 1926, but his stone says 1920. I suspect, however, that he
was dead when he was buried. At least one person has tried to tell me
to believe the stone, even though I have a family picture of him dated
1925.
Elizabeth C
ronald ferguson wrote:
Interesting! Elizabeth, ple
1familytree wrote:
I am reposting this as I sent it at 2 this afternoon, and as of yet have
not seen it appear on the list.
My apologies if you receive duplicates.
I suggest you become familiar with one of the less-desirable
idiosyncrasies of GMail before leaping to false conclusions :-)
Wh
Strange - I have done this often in the past - but today I did a
search - clicked OPTIONS while viewing the LIST - ADVANCED TAGGING -
then picked TAG - EVERYONE IN LIST with TAG 3. On the list view -
that happened. BUT when I went back to the Family view - the #3 TAG
was not marked?? In the uppe
Keith,
Works OK for me. When you tagged them did the cross appear below the tag3
heading for all those in the list?
Ron Ferguson
_
Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
View the Grimshaw
No it doesn't work. If you are adding a new person as spouse to a male then
the sex buttons are greyed out and it is already showing as a female (and
v.v).
If you start with a new unknown sex person the program seems to default so
that the person sits on the male side on family view. When adding a
Yes - and I think I am OK now -- wish there were a way to now DELETE
the original message!! I was looking at the wrong Adam Ulrich in my
file (I have 4) -- What can I say - it was before 7am here in the
Eastern part of the US - guess the brain was still sleeping.
Keith
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:0
If you want your tombstone images to show up in reports you will have to create
an event for the person, you can call it whatever you want like; tombstone
image, headstone photo, etc.
In the new event you can attach the photo, but remember that if you have more
then one tombstone image that you
Glad it's OK. We've all done it, Keith!!
Ron Ferguson
_
Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. En
You will probably want to add a couple of criteria to limit the records in
the list, e.g. for the 1930 census you would want: Individual, death date,
equal, blank OR Individual, death date, after, 1929
Mike
Michael J Method
phone= 317-284-1303
family research of: Method, Feehily, Fredrick,
leo macdonald wrote
In the new event you can attach the photo, but remember that if you
have more then one tombstone image that you want to print in reports
then you will have to add each photo to a new event. You can add
several images to one event but only the perferred photo will print in
t
Jenny:
My headstone photos are not attached to an 'Event' rather they are entered
under burial pictures found in the plus sign to the right of Buried in the
Individual's Information screen. I attach a picture to each person if
husband and wife (or more) are on the headstone. If you print an individ
Jenny:
I attach the tombstone picture to each person that appears on the
tombstone. The people could appear in various pages of a report, so I
would worry about duplication of a picture.
___
Leon Chapman
chap...@gmail.com
-
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Jenny M Benson wrote:
> leo macdo
Jenny,
Whilst I do not actually create an Event for my tombstone pics I do insert them
into the web page for the individual(s) named on them. Thus a multiname stone
will be linked to each of the persons named.
In effect this would be very similar to creating an Event and linking it to
each
I have put the link to 'my' family's stones to include most in the photo
gallery of each person. The multiple links do not take much memory space. When
I started I only had census photocopies and the gravestone to put in the photo
field, and I 'needed' to fill it up.
When your 'stone photo' is
In looking at my stuff, I find that some events were wrongly marked private.
Have you identified which are missing and
Rich in LA CA
--- On Sun, 8/9/09, 1familytree <1familytree@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: 1familytree <1familytree@gmail.com>
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Missing events in descen
We've discussed this in the past and Legacy told us that they were not
going to accommodate those of us who have a same-sex partner in the
Legacy program. Let's all of us tell them that is important to us to
have this in Legacy. If enough of us say we want and need it, they will
try to add it as
Thanks everyone. Some very excellent and helpful ideas!
From: Sharon Johnson
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2009 11:56:19 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries
I don't think that has been addressed yet as g
It's not a matter that we're *not* going to do it - it's a matter that the
way Legacy is structured we *can't* do it at this time without a complete
rewrite of the database structure. Of course, that would have a
trickle-down effect for the developers of the add-on programs and they'd
have to rewr
For those that have access to the new versions of the other programs, such as
Family Tree by Ancestry – how is this handled there? I would think that if the
other “competitors” have incorporated this, then Millennia would get on with it
and do it.
> Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Se
Sherry,
Is this database re-write ever going to happen? We have been hearing this same
response for at least three years now. I think Millennia needs to be honest
with their users. Either this re-write is going to happen or it isn't. This
excuse has ceased to be believable.
---
Ron Bernier,
For years we have been hearing that many often requested features would
require a complete rewrite. There must be quite a list by now. The
only thing we've never heard is just when this complete rewrite will be
happening. Or even when it will get started. I doubt very much that it
will be L
Remember you can mark all uses of an event as private in the event
definition *or* you can mark just one person's use of that event as
private from the Individual's Information screen *or* both. Have you
checked both places?
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 2:44 PM, 1familytree<1familytree@gmail.com> w
There are only two that I know of - the same sex relationships and Unicode.
Thanks for using Legacy.
Sherry
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
supp...@legacyfamilytree.com
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
We are changing the world of genealogy!
When replying to this message, please include a
Do you know if allowing Alternate Names to be included in the Name Index is
still on the wish list for Descendent Book Reports in Word?
Ruth Nerud
baber...@worldnet.att.net
- Original Message -
From: "Sherry/Support"
To:
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 1:22 PM
Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [L
Sherry,
What about witnesses/roles. That has been requested countless times and that
also keeps getting the age old response that it requires a re-write of the
database. Why can't Millennia just be honest with their users and admit that
they have no intention of implementing any of these requ
Legacy has coded the names so that Word can create the Name Index. In the
RTF Descendant Book Report, under Name Index, it says:
"[Note: Using your word processor, generate an Index here.]
[All names have been marked as index entries in this document.]
[Erase these three lines.]
In Word 2007, c
It creates it on the screen as Preview in Legacy, it creates it in .pdf but
it does not have coding to print Alternate Names in Word. It should read All
names except Alternate Names have been marked as index entries, etc. because
it never did in Ver. 7 or Ver. 6. I have to manually add the code
Thank you Mike, I am now aware of this "idiosyncrasy" which is/was news to
me.
Boy, people on here are sure intolerant of "newbies"
I even apologized in advance.
Can you tell me of any other idiosyncrasies that I should look out for?
Just trying to use Legacy
Thanks again for pointing out the
Ron,
Where are you reading into her response ANYTHING to indicate such a re-write
was either promised or in progress? She is simply stating the fact that the
current structure will not accept such a change. Any re-write has to make
economic sense for the company. And there needs to be enou
Ruth-
Do you have the deluxe version? Alternate names
in the name index shows up in my Legacy. I went to:
Reports » Reports Menu » Books/Other » Descendants button.
Make sure the "Index Options" is checked, and
click "Index Options." Make sure that BOTH
"Include a Name Index" and "Include a
Seems to me there is ample way to handle such things, if desired, in existing
program, no call for it in Geneology and there are plenty of ways to handle it
for Family History.
Walt Conner
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
Robert, I have BOTH checked. This has been reported and acknowledged as a
bug by Legacy staff. You aren't doing what I am. Go to Books>Publishing
Center>Descendant Report. Create a book in .rtf format. When it opens up in
Word, go to Options>View. Check All under Formatting marks. Go back to you
Her responses always give the impression that at some point in time a re-write
will happen. I am asking that Millennia be honest with their customer for a
change and give us an honest answer as to whether or not this re-write is or is
not going to happen. In other words, stop making excuses an
I think the question about Alternate names does not belong as a part of this
thread. This thread is about Same Sex Relationship Entries. It is easy to
start another thread that has as its subject Alternate names. I don't think
using a thread about Same Sex Relationship Entries should suddenly be
Ron,
It took from Legacy 2 to Legacy 7 to get Drop Down Box Charts which did not
require a complete re-write, seems to me you are being a might impatient,
why all the fuss especially since there is a work around.
Walt Conner
" stop making excuses"
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http
I just realized that myself - I should have changed the subject. Sorry.
Ruth
- Original Message -
From: Leonard Johnson Sweden
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries
I t
I will now bring this thread back on topic! THE TOPIC IS SAME SEX
RELATIONSHIP ENTRIES!!!
On 04 January 2009 Denise L. Moss-Fritch revised her web site. On her web
site she gives details about a work around for same sex couples. This work
around, according to the web site, is provided by Technica
Millennia markets Legacy as suitable for both genealogy and family
history. And it's not as though people in this thread are requesting a
new feature in the program (such as witnesses or Unicode), which may or
may not ever happen. People here are requesting the fixing of an
existing bug. Sam
Walt,
You may be satisfied with using work arounds. If a work around keeps you
happy, then that is fine for you. Many of us are not happy with using an
inefficient work around. As to your quote " stop making excuses" - taken out
of context and has absolutely no meaning or value.
Ron Bernie
I did just as you, creating the report in Publishing Center.
On the Contents tab, Descendant Report is highlighted.
On the Additional tab, the box by Index Options is checked. Click on Index
Options. On the Name Index tab, check the box by Include a Name Index and
the box by Include Alternate
I did just as you, creating the report in Publishing Center.
On the Contents tab, Descendant Report is highlighted.
On the Additional tab, the box by Index Options is checked. Click on Index
Options. On the Name Index tab, check the box by Include a Name Index and
the box by Include Alternate
Ron,
I only drop in for a couple of days every 6 months and this fuss about
nothing is one reason. While the quote you mention may not mean anything to
you, neither does your fuss mean anything to me.
"Same sex marriages have been legal in other countries for
many years before they were legal
Jay,
Responders to this list come from many cultures, including some where
English is not their native tongue. Add in the fact that email tends to get
dashed off rather quickly and it is easy to see how messages can
unintentionally come across as curt. The gmail issue must come up every few
w
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:26:15 -0500, "Ruth Nerud"
wrote:
>Do you know if allowing Alternate Names to be included in the Name Index is
>still on the wish list for Descendent Book Reports in Word?
Ruth:
It probably would have been a good idea to start a new thread (subject
line) for this topic.
Ok, I got you now. I previewed it, and it is showing alternate
names. Then I generated a RTF file, and the format is different, but
the alternate names are there. When I preview it, it looks like this:
CARNEAL
Nancy15
~Nannie..18
Joseph...43
~Joey22
Robert Carneal USA wrote:
But, when I do an RTF, the "worm" character is moved. It looks like this:
CARNEAL
Nancy15
Nannie~..18
Joseph...43
Joey~22
Thanks for the chuckle, Robert. For future reference, your 'worm'
character - never heard of that one
Second Request
Any ideas?
Pat
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pat
Date: Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 2:31 PM
Subject: Search Problem
To: LegacyUserGroup List
Is there a way that I can search for those persons who need Census events?
For example: 1) All persons who might appear in the 193
Pat,
There have been two replies to your question which, when taken together, give
the answer.
Ron Ferguson
_
Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http:
Hi Pat,
Many users record census events differently. To give you the best solution
can you tell us how you record the census events?
First do you record them as an event or a source to events such as
occupation or residence.
If you recorded it as an event
Secondly is your event title "Census" w
Well, Ron, I certainly hope that everyone connected to your extended family is
of the same religion as you- not that religion is a preventative measure
against being homosexual- and lives/lived in the same country and state as you.
The "I don't have anyone like this in my database" argument is
Sorry, meant to address to Walter, not Ron
- Original Message
> From: Patti Wyble
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 4:42:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries
>
> Well, Ron, I certainly hope that everyone con
This message thread has become disruptive to the LegacyUserGroup (LUG).
Please stop this thread. Do not reply to it.
The LUG is not a free forum for political or social commentary, activist
issues, religious opinion or morality lectures. Millennia Corporation
reserves the right to ban discussion
I sent the resolution to this group on 8/9/2009 6:44 pm. Please read your
postings.
Valerie
-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Pat Patton
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 5:41 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject
I'll probably get banned - but since I live in a state where same-sex
marriage is legal, this is not a hot-button issue here. It ceased to be
a hot-button within weeks of becoming legal so Jim, I suggest you get
with the times. This was not about the social issues but about the
capabilities of
This will require several steps. I use the 1900 census for this example so if
you are trying to do others you will need to adjust the dates accordingly. The
1900 census heading says "include every person living on June 1, 1900". This
works if the census taker was being precise about who was e
In fairness to the staff. When (no names) someone at a convention slipped and
stated that an update to fix something was on the way, and later found out the
fix was much bigger than it appeared at first, the feeding frenzy caused a
version to be shipped before complete (my guess). The crew may
Sherry,
After the misery we have gone through for the past 15 months with Legacy
7, I am sure that the majority of Legacy users would not look forward to
a "complete rewrite of the database structure".
Sherry/Support wrote:
It's not a matter that we're *not* going to do it - it's a matter t
I have entered the hard disk directory information, of my Google Chrome
browser, in the Legacy > Customize > Launch > Alternate Applications >
Alternate Web Browser location. I verified that the correct hard disk
location is/was correct by selecting the "Launch" button. Sure enough the
Goog
58 matches
Mail list logo
