Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 06:57:54 +
From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache
>From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Write-back forces a simultaneous write to memory with every write to
cache, so there's a ram access delay at every write. Write-through writes to
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 06:14:15 +
From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 50CT LCD
>Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 00:48:52 -0500
>From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: 50CT LCD
>
>Is the 50 LCD compatiable with the 70CT?
Yes. between the 50 and the 70 *everythin
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 06:05:36 +
From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] display brightness
>Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:29:47 +0800
>From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] display brightness
>
>
>> > OTOH, the flourescent is *very* tightly bound - it's screw
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 00:48:52 -0500
From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 50CT LCD
Is the 50 LCD compatiable with the 70CT?
John
**
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
http://www.silverace.com/lib
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 00:43:40 -0500
From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 3M RDF-C
> >I was looking through the literature on the the 3M RDF-C transflective
film
> >to see if they recommend it with a colored display and they do say it is
for
> >colored characteres or b
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 05:53:53 +
From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:53:20 -0500
>From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: cpu cache
>
>Hi
>
>What is the differance between the write through and write back settings in
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 00:49:27 -0500
From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] display brightness
> >well to loosen glue. Do you know the address of the dimmer for the
> >backlight? Is it possible to completely shut it off? Is there any kind of
> >sdk availible for the libr
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 12:48:58 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Touch-Screen Libertto alternative from Fujitsu
(P-1000 Lifebook)
At 09:12 PM 26/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 04:05 +
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] Touch-Screen Li
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 04:05 +
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Touch-Screen Libertto alternative from Fujitsu (P-1000 Lifebook)
|Believe someone here was looking for a Libretto to be outfitted with a touch-screen.
|Why build when you can buy, right?
|
|d =)
Here! After my ema
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 00:02:11 -0400
From: "Gennadiy Tsygan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache
>From what I remember from old computer articles, write back should be
faster. Can't remember why.
- Original Message -
From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Librett
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 23:58:50 -0400
From: "Gennadiy Tsygan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
I need to stress that my experiences are based solely on my L110 running
WinXP. With XP and Win2000 hibernation is controlled by the OS, so
"hardware" hibernation is
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:40:19 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Touch-Screen Libertto alternative from Fujitsu
(P-1000 Lifebook)
At 05:16 PM 26/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 17:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
>From: David Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Touc
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:32:34 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 3M RDF-C
At 12:27 PM 26/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:47:52 -0500
>From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: 3M RDF-C
>
>I was looking through the literature on the the 3
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:25:41 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] display brightness
At 11:07 AM 26/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:03:31 +
>From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] display brightness
>
>
>
>>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:36:42 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
At 01:01 PM 26/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 19:57:19 +
>From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:56:00 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Phantom disks??
At 10:01 PM 25/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 05:57:02 +0100 (GMT/BST)
>From: Digby Tarvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] Phantom disks??
>
> > >
> > >The final c
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:47:26 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] (Re)Installation...
>The fist is I think it would be prudent to attempt to backup my
>Linux install on to tape or some other media, and re-install onto
>the new partitions from backup. Whilst I havn't inve
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:27:54 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
At 11:38 AM 26/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:32:00 -0400
>From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
>
> >
> > The major differenc
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:31:13 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Memory expansion for 70CT
At 12:21 PM 26/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:21:02 +0100
>From: "Mark Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Memory expansion for 70CT
>
>
>
>Hello there,
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:29:47 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] display brightness
> > OTOH, the flourescent is *very* tightly bound - it's screwed and glued and
> > taped and generally very cuddled up to the screen :-)
>
>But it does come apart. A little fingernail po
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:23:38 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
> > I went from an L50 to an L100 and I'm very happy with it ... it IS bigger
> > than the L50/70 and it does have some quirks in terms of
> > hibernation/suspend but its more than made u
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:15:57 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
At 09:52 AM 26/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:57:29 -0500
>From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
>
>Hi Tom
>
>Thanks for
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:10:55 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
At 05:11 AM 26/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 08:06:52 -0400
>From: "Gennadiy Tsygan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:13:44 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
At 06:41 AM 26/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:38:44 +
>From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
>
>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:07:20 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Cell phones and Libretto
At 11:52 PM 25/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 06:49:20 +
>From: "Cerulean Skies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] Cell phones and Libretto
>
>>From: Ra
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:04:21 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Phantom disks??
At 08:07 PM 25/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 03:02:24 +
>From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] Phantom disks??
>
>{Digby]
So the puzzle I
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:05:25 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Phantom disks??
At 08:17 PM 25/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 03:12:58 +
>From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] Phantom disks??
>
>
>>>I wonder if there's any
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:53:20 -0500
From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cpu cache
Hi
What is the differance between the write through and write back settings in
the bios? I changed mine from write back to write through and now my 70 is
really moving!!!
John
*
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 17:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Touch-Screen Libertto alternative from Fujitsu (P-1000 Lifebook)
http://www.fujitsupc.com/www/products_notebooks.shtml?products/notebooks/p1000
$1499 gets you a mini-notebook with touch screen display.
Be
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:42:34 +
From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 19:57:19 +
>From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
>
>>From: "Gennadiy Tsygan" <[EMAI
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:35:51 +
From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Memory expansion for 70CT
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:21:02 +0100
>From: "Mark Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Memory expansion for 70CT
>
>
>
>Hello there,
>
>I'm trying to confirm that a me
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:38:45 +
From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:02:39 +
>From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
>
>>From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PR
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:31:48 -0500
From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Memory expansion for 70CT
> Hello there,
>
> I'm trying to confirm that a memory expansion card (16Mb) out of a
libretto 50 will also work in the faster libretto 70. Is this true?
>
Yes they do
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:02:39 +
From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
>From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>If the fat is damaged, then it will in all likelyhood bluescreen when the
>file access occurs as the pointers will be all
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 19:57:19 +
From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
>From: "Gennadiy Tsygan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Deleting cookies or temp files will not give you Blue screen. The worst
>effect of loosing cookies will be that web si
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:57:08 -0400
From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Fw: [langalist] LangaList Standard Edition 2002-04-22
Here's a utility I intend to try with my Librettos. From LangaList.
> 5) Automatic Power-Off From DOS
>
> When you exit Windows, you have several choices
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Kevin McClelland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
On Fri, 26 April 2002, "John Musielewicz" wrote
>
> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:57:29 -0500
> From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:47:52 -0500
From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 3M RDF-C
I was looking through the literature on the the 3M RDF-C transflective film
to see if they recommend it with a colored display and they do say it is for
colored characteres or backgrounds. To inst
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:21:02 +0100
From: "Mark Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Memory expansion for 70CT
Hello there,
I'm trying to confirm that a memory expansion card (16Mb) out of a libretto 50 will
also work in the faster libretto 70. Is this true?
The 50 has a cpu speed of 7
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Kevin McClelland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
On Fri, 26 April 2002, Pres Waterman wrote
>
> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:32:00 -0400
> From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:45:57 +
From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:32:00 -0400
>From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
>
> >
> > The major difference is the internal design. 50 and 70
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:27:06 -0500
From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] display brightness
- Original Message -
From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Libretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [LIB] display brightn
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:40:24 EDT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Libretto 70CT
Hey everyone! Does any one want to swap a Libretto 70CT for a ps2+2
games+more?? Its worth about £260. If anyone wants a swap then email me!
Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:32:00 -0400
From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
>
> The major difference is the internal design. 50 and 70 are basically 486
> architecture while 100 are Pentium class architecture. This can be show in
Why would you say that? Th
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:19:13 -0400
From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] UK libretto options stock clearance
> Silly lazy question but does the 50 have type a II slot (for the disk)
please?
Yes
>
> Also the MCS (EPR) would give me USB yes?
No. Only on the L1x0 series do
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:16:48 -0400
From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Lib 100 for sale
>
> Oh, Tom, you can NEVER have enough libbies. I bought FOUR on Ebay, and not
> at the same time. Stocking stuffers. You've obviously never lost one. It's
> like a death in the famil
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:17 +
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] New Libretto L5
I would contact companies in Japan in order to persuade them to sell the Libbies
worldwide. E.g. the company, which sells the size-of-L110 VAIO U1 (see other topic)
for about $1400 + $40 H/S + $105 e
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:06:51 +
From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
>Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 00:38:03 +0700
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
>Is the FAT info always at the beginning of the p
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:03:31 +
From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] display brightness
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:55:20 -0500
>From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] display brightness
>I need to mess with the lcd. I modified a reflective
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:52:20 -0400
From: "Lawrence Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
- Original Message -
From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Libretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 00:38:03 +0700
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
> My point is not that the cookies and temp files are required, but that
> you'll get a blue screen if you destroy the files system on which they are
> stored. If the FAT points to so
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 00:38:09 +0700
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
> Deleting cookies will not save any significant amount of space anyway.
The suggestion was not just cookies, it was cookies + history + temporary
Internet files
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:03:19 -0500
From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
- Original Message -
To: "Libretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:26 AM
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:24:49 -0
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:06:08 -0500
From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Re: [lib] Parts for 50-110CT
- Original Message -
From: "Lines, Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Libretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 11:41 AM
Subject: [LIB] Re: [lib
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:09:02 -0500
From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
- Original Message -
To: "Libretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:21 AM
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 23:18:01 +0
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:57:29 -0500
From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
Hi Tom
Thanks for the info. I was doing a search for third party power supplies and
such for the 100/110 and didn't find much. I found a bunch for the 50/70
though. Has anyone
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:55:20 -0500
From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] display brightness
Hi Neil
Thanks for the tip on the memory. I pulled it and it solved my problems.
Interesting the memory passed every diagnostic test I ran on it. Maybe I
have a bad socket. I
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:41:03 -0700
From: Daniel Seiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Interesting site..
Hello
http://shop.conics.net/
*
Daniel Seiden
Internet Services - http://www.basiclink.com
Dan's Digital Images - http://dan.digit
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:37:10 -0500
From: "Lines, Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [lib] Parts for 50-110CT
>Has anyone used this place for parts? They seem to have pretty good prices
>and carry a complete line.
I'll let you know next week when the order arrives...
;-)
Nick.
***
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:28:57 -0700
From: Daniel Seiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re[4]: [LIB] New Libretto L5
Hello
From what I have heard they offer very good service. I have a
friend who purchased a unit from them and has been very happy with
the service and support that he has
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:22:34 -0400
From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [LIB] New Libretto L5
I spoke with Dynamism yesterday, and although they do NOT accept the Toshiba
FDC settlement freecard, they do offer a courtesy discount up to $200 if you
have one. Since they ar
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 23:18:01 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
>I am still working on my &*(^%& 70CT and its rebooting problem.
>Basically I am thinking of selling it as spare parts and getting a 100
>or 110CT. I was wondering- what are the main diff
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:38:44 +
From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 08:06:52 -0400
>From: "Gennadiy Tsygan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
>
>Deleting cookies or temp files
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:24:49 -0400
From: "Lawrence Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] 70CT verses 100CT
The major difference is the internal design. 50 and 70 are basically 486
architecture while 100 are Pentium class architecture. This can be show in
many cases:
(1) When put in st
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:30:21 +
From: T i m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re: [LIB] UK libretto options stock clearance
Cheers Nick ..;-)
T i m
>
> From: "Lines, Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 01:01:16 -0700
> To: Libretto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LIB] UK
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 08:06:52 -0400
From: "Gennadiy Tsygan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] "Hardware" hibernation in L110
Deleting cookies or temp files will not give you Blue screen. The worst
effect of loosing cookies will be that web sites remembering you login and
preferences will f
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:39:26 +0100 (GMT/BST)
From: Digby Tarvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: (Re)Installation...
Further to my 'Phantom disk' thread, I am starting to resign myself to
the need to regard the first run through as a test install, and wipe
everything and try the partitioning again
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 02:58:58 -0500
From: "Lines, Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] UK libretto options stock clearance
>Also the MCS (EPR) would give me USB yes?
No. The 50/70 EPR doesn't have USB ports and,
just to really compound the misery, you can't add
USB by using a PCMCIA a
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 07:30:13 +
From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] UK libretto options stock clearance
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 07:44:37 +0100
>From: T i m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [LIB] UK libretto options stock clearance
>
>Hi,
>
>Silly lazy question but d
69 matches
Mail list logo
