We have been running Domino (legacy Notes and now Xpages) applications on SuSE
successfully on zSeries. Now however am prompted to look at Red Hat on the same
platform. Does anyone use Domino on zSeries Red Hat? If so, how satisfied are
you with the compatibility, installs etc. Thanks
Hello.
We have installed Domino in Zlinux and we are using FDR/Upstream
to back up Domino DataBases.
The definitions for the type of Domino Logs is Arcive. It means,
after the backup, Domino reused the inactive logs.
Well, we have followed the instructions of Fdr
On 4/19/07, Fred Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm no Domino person (our Midrange Server guys are running the
benchmarks), but they showed me a display that they say demonstrates that
Domino recognises that there are 2x CPU's.
My understanding from measuring Domino is
Hi Folks,
How do we make Lotus Domino multitask to take advantage of additional
CPU's?
We're benchmarking Domino under z/Linux in a 2x IFL z/VM 5.2 environment.
I've defined 2x CPU's in the user directory entry for the guest and
INDicate USER shows CPU time against both IF
On 9/22/06, Rich Smrcina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, that's weird. On the other hand the cvs server is one of my best
behaved virtual machines.
Marcy is lucky since she has the tools to diagnose this ;-)So
we'll have a look when she has time.
--
Rob van der Heij
Velocity Software, In
Yes, that's weird. On the other hand the cvs server is one of my best
behaved virtual machines.
Marcy Cortes wrote:
I've got one that hangs every 7-8 days. It's not oversized, everything
else on the system is running fine. It's only this one cvs server.
(there's only 1 so I have nothing to com
sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation."
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rob van der Heij
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 2:21 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390
We've noticed that Domino machines that are running for extended periods
of time tend to run out of memory, suggesting a memory leak. We have to
reboot our virtual machine every couple of months or so for just this
reason.
Robert J Brenneman wrote:
The fact that the linux server i
do not have any Domino debug information. I have searched the
This sound more like your virtual server end up in the eligable list.
That happens when VM has not be tuned to prevent that, and your
virtual server is oversized. When it has been running long enough it
found enough useless data to ret
domino guest
is listed as being in E3 - if so, that could be the problem.
--
Jay Brenneman
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
I'm not sure it was the same thing, but we had a client running Domino
and we fixed the various hangs (could be similar to this) by giving each
Domino virtual machine two virtual processors. That way any one long
running Domino process couldn't lock out the whole server... Even when
I have a customer running Domino on Linux for zSeries under VM.
Unfortunately it is only used for outbound email (SMTP) at this time. :(
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Main: (866)569-7378
Cell: (414)491-6001
Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org
WAVV 2007 - Green Bay, WI
- Original Message
Does anyone successfully run Domino 6.5.x on Linux Vm?
As the Domino administrator I do not have a baseline for performance on any
of these boxes. Niether can I speak to the way the vm has been setup. I am
basing my opinion on my experience with the existing zlinux installs here
and the number
oth client and server here, are trials from the appropriate
page on IBM.com.
--
Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"This signature was once found posting rude
messages in English in the Moscow subway."
On 9/23/05, Rich Smrcina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a customer run
I have a client that is in the process of consolidating many Windows NT
servers running Domino onto fewer, larger Intel SLES8 systems. They're
happier than they were before.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gregg C Levine
I have a customer running a small Domino server on Linux for zSeries
(SLES8 for now). When they can scrape up more disk space they are
interested in moving their Domino on Windows server to Domino on Linux
for zSeries.
You will need to get a support statement for Domino to make sure that it
is
be a Domino
server on the Linux system, and Notes as clients everywhere else, with
the later intentions of migrating off of their badly done Exchange
setup. As for connecting the server to the outside world, well on that
subject I'll defer to the group for advice.
They now want me to draft a proof
I just did this, the install script looks for s390 to come out of uname
-m. There were no RPMs in the package that I installed.
Dave Czajkowski wrote:
I am running SLES8 for zSeries on a z990. My client is attempting to
install Domino. He previously had acquired a
I am running SLES8 for zSeries on a z990. My client is attempting to
install Domino. He previously had acquired a c82buna_Domino_654_linux.tar
file which contains a s390.rpm. When he attempted the install, he did not
get past the uname check for s390 (as opposed to s390x). He has since
> Subject: ClamAV and Domino on 390
>
> Any possibility? If so, has anyone tried it?
Works fine, although it is somewhat CPU intensive for high volumes of mail.
Our SMTPPLUS product uses it (and a number of other anti-spam/anti-virus
gadgets) to do virus scanning. We found it more pra
-end Intel
box. There are sites running Domino quite well on System/390, but I
have no direct experience with it.
Adam
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
Any possibility? If so, has anyone tried it?
+--+
| Chris Little OKDHS Platform Services |
| IS Operating Systems Specialist IV |
| email [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| work (405)522-1306 cell (405)229-7822
workload
>and 2 IFL engines for an eventual z/VM zLinux workload consisting largely
>of Domino and WebSphere.
>
>We're expecting to run 10 Domino email DPARs and possibly up to 10-20
>WebSphere servers, although we don't know just yet what those applications
>will be.
&g
sting largely
of Domino and WebSphere.
We're expecting to run 10 Domino email DPARs and possibly up to 10-20
WebSphere servers, although we don't know just yet what those applications
will be.
We're trying to determine how much real storage to include on this z890
processor. z890
Hi,
We're planning to acquire a z890 processor w/ 1 CP for a z/VM CMS workload
and 2 IFL engines for an eventual z/VM zLinux workload consisting largely
of Domino and WebSphere.
We're expecting to run 10 Domino email DPARs and possibly up to 10-20
WebSphere servers, although we don&#
Hi all,
we're migrating our domino ddbb to domino 6.5.3 in SLES8 for s390.
Is there any tool to backup the ddbb?
We're currently using Tivoli Storage Manager + Tivoli Data Protection for
Lotus Domino.
Thanks in adv
ores
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@kbtoys.com
Bill Bitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port
01/04/2005 08:58 AM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc:
Subject:Re: [LINUX-390] Domino on LINUX/VM
Doug, that'
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:58:07 -0500, Bill Bitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug, that's an interesting idea to run a virtual 2-way on the single
I used to think that something like that would be fun to run MVS as
well because MVS would enable one of the CPU's for I/O interrupts and
this would le
Doug, that's an interesting idea to run a virtual 2-way on the single
IFL. I never thought of that. It is, as you say, against conventional
wisdom, but this job is full of exceptions. I could see some challenges
in terms of lock contention, though this might be a case where Linux
use of Diagnose x'
Bill,
Thanks for the reply.
I am tempted to try defining two virtual processors for the Domino virtual
machine, even though there is only one real processor. I know this is
contrary to conventional wisdom, but it might make sense in this situation.
If I understand your comment, with only one
* IBM Lotus Domino 6.5 for Linux on zSeries Implementation
See: http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247021.html
This IBM Redbook will help the reader plan for, install, and configure the new
IBM Lotus Domino 6.5 product on an IBM zSeries system running Linux. We
discuss why you should
Doug,
The primary concern for running Domino in a 1-way configuraiton
is to avoid a background or mgmt Domino task from taking over the
system. The thought being that a second processor allows one to allow
other work to run. Depending on the heaviness of your Domino users,
you maybe be able to run
For a "production" evironment, I think you need one
more IFL engine. For the Proof of Concept, 1 IFL
should be ok!
A little tuning must be done deleting services that
you don't need in order to increase efficency of the
Domino Server.
Be carefull about level of Patch (us
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:39:27 -0500, Doug Fairobent
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> one and only IFL. I have read that Domino may not perform well with only
> one IFL, but I can hardly justify buying another IFL just to do a proof of
When I read that statement in the redbook it surpr
TECTED]
390 Port cc
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU> Subject
Re: Domino on LINUX/VM
12/10/2004 11:53
AM
Which kind of IFL you have??? (z800, z890, z900,
z990)???
How many users on Domino?
Are you using Domino only for Mail Systems?
--- Doug Fairobent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ha scritto:
> Is anyone running Lotus Domino on LINUX/VM on a
> uni-processor? I am
> planning on doing a Dom
Is anyone running Lotus Domino on LINUX/VM on a uni-processor? I am
planning on doing a Domino on Linux/VM pilot as a proof of concept using my
one and only IFL. I have read that Domino may not perform well with only
one IFL, but I can hardly justify buying another IFL just to do a proof of
Aristarc,
You can find a list of vendor products for Linux on zSeries at
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/solutions/s390da/linuxproduct.html
Take a look at TrendMicro. They have an AV solution that plugs into
Domino on Linux for zSeries.
Regards,
Peter
Linux for zSeries
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 01:41:32PM +0200, Aristarc Diez wrote:
> We're migrating our mail servers to Domino on Linux 390 ( zSeries).
> Does anyone know a good antivirus for Domino?
Consider front-ending the Domino servers with a Linux guest or an
Intel box running Exim, Amavis, and
0 [ææä] äå 07:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Antivirus for Domino on SLES8
We're migrating our mail servers to Domino on Linux 390 ( zSeries).
Does anyone know a good antivirus for Domino?
We're migrating our mail servers to Domino on Linux 390 ( zSeries).
Does anyone know a good antivirus for Domino?
TIA
...
: : :
: : Aristarc Diez : [EMAIL PROT
You didn't mention how many MIPS you're throwing at the z/Linux.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
James Melin
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 12:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Domino 6.5 performance a little disapp
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ryan Ware
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 1:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Domino 6.5 performance a little disappointing on zLinux
>
>
> The sad part is tha
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 1:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Domino 6.5 performance a little disappointing on zLinux
>
> Hipersockets are an absolute godsend. This of course requires you to have
> your DB2 data on the same phy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on To
390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc
IST.EDU>
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 12:06, James Melin wrote:
> using z/linux and
> WebSphere in a tuned environment using all of the available
> performance
> tweaks of that environment. This is repeatable.
>
>
Care to share those tweaks?
--
d by more CPU intensive "collaboration
> systems".)
I suppose it's a matter of comparison. Domino on Linux is a screamer
compared to Domino on z/OS.
It depends a lot on your application construction and design. As someone
else mentioned, if your applications assume that CPU and mem
IST.EDU> Subject
Re: Domino 6.5 performance a little
disappointing on zLinux
07/19/2004 11:56
AM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Por
M
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Domino 6.5 performance a little disappointing on zLinux
>
>
> >>Obviously I'm joking, but it just seems to me the phrase
> different horses
> for different courses seems to apply in spades here.
>
> And I agree. Perhaps yo
>>Obviously I'm joking, but it just seems to me the phrase different horses
for different courses seems to apply in spades here.
And I agree. Perhaps you could make this point to IBM's marketing
department. (And should you have driven this point home with them during
the commercial onslaught dur
ve ones in all
but the most mission critical apps.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Lashley/SCO [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 11:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Domino 6.5 performance a little disappointing on zLinux
>
> &g
ngs that
>>can be offloaded to the client processor. May not help in your
>>situation, but it tends to point up where Lotus needs to do some work on
>>Domino on platforms where CPU isn't infinite or free.
CPU processing speed is looking more and more like an unfortunate
> Comparisons between an in house Domino app when run on a 800Mhz Wintel
> with 500MB RAM versus a SLES8 zLinux guest machine with 256MB
> storage and
> 300MB of VDISK swap on an almost idle 192 MIP IFL show the Wintel box
> processing about 3 times faster. The numbers are co
Comparisons between an in house Domino app when run on a 800Mhz Wintel
with 500MB RAM versus a SLES8 zLinux guest machine with 256MB storage and
300MB of VDISK swap on an almost idle 192 MIP IFL show the Wintel box
processing about 3 times faster. The numbers are coming from the Domino
web log
> I installed domino notes on a Suse 7.2. ...
I assume you are referring to the Domino (server part) here not the
Notes client? If yes, it is ONLY suported on SUSE SLES 8 with service
pack 3 (might be SP2, but you should be at SP3). Several things were
added to get Domino 6.5 to work.
Thanks Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Post, Mark K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: Installing Domino Notes on Suse 7.2
Nilson,
I believe there was a "compat" rpm that would cont
Nilson,
I believe there was a "compat" rpm that would contain stuff like that.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nilson
Vieira
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 10:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installing Domin
That was it. IBM here tells me sys_epoll - will be standard in 2.6 required
for domino to not suck.
"Ferguson, Neale"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oftwareAG-USA.com To
>
I think it was the /dev/epoll feature which improves performance
compared to poll() or select().
Neale
-Original Message-
Actually, even if you get Domino to go under SLES 7, you don't want to.
SLES8 has a 2.6 backported feature added by SuSE to really make Domino
run.
I forget wh
Actually, even if you get Domino to go under SLES 7, you don't want to.
SLES8 has a 2.6 backported feature added by SuSE to really make Domino run.
I forget what it was but the IBM Linux guy we have here mentioned it today.
He said Domino will not perform well under RHEL 3, but would under
Nilson Vieira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 02.06.2004, 16:06:52:
> /home/notes/lotus/notes/latest/zlinux/tunekrnl: error while loading
> shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot load shared object file: No
> such file or directory
>
> I tried a few things but didn4t work.
>
> Can someone help me
Hi all
I installed domino notes on a Suse 7.2. When a try to run the application i get the
following message:
/home/notes/lotus/notes/latest/zlinux/tunekrnl: error while loading shared libraries:
libstdc++.so.5: cannot load shared object file: No such file or directory
I tried a few things
Seems to be fixed now.
Michael
FN>> You might want to rebuild the PDF. The bookmarks are badly constructed and
FN>> consisted of things that don't look like headings. The main part of the book
FN>> comes under the bookmark "The following terms are trademark...". I also
FN>> received some "bad o
Neale,
Thanks - I let the ITSO know.
-Mike MacIsaac, IBM mikemac at us.ibm.com (845) 433-7061
It may be a draft, but even so things like "Delete this note box when
done" are not the standard one expects from IBM. Perhaps Lotus should
give up Framemaker and use Epic?
Michael (ex Boeblingen documentation)
FN> Mike,
FN> You might want to rebuild the PDF. The bookmarks are badly constructed
Rich Smrcina wrote:
I can read it with Acrobat Reader 5.0.8 for Linux. I haven't scrolled
through the whole thing, but the first couple dozen pages look fine.
The Table of Contents is missing the entries for the main body of the
book (with
Xpdf 2.01) which means that I need to browse the book fr
x on 390 Port
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject:Re: New redpiece: IBM Lotus Domino 6.5 for Linux on z Series
> Impl
> ementation
>
>
> The copy I downloaded was even worse. Whole pages of garbage.
>
>
> Mark Post
>
&g
4/2003 04:50 PM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: New redpiece: IBM Lotus Domino 6.5 for Linux on z Series
Impl
ementation
The copy I downloaded was even worse. Whole pages of garbage.
Mark Post
-Original Messa
The copy I downloaded was even worse. Whole pages of garbage.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Ferguson, Neale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New redpiece: IBM Lotus Domino 6.5 for Linux on z Series
Mike,
You might want to rebuild the PDF. The bookmarks are badly constructed and
consisted of things that don't look like headings. The main part of the book
comes under the bookmark "The following terms are trademark...". I also
received some "bad object" messages from Acrobat (which may not be y
Hi list,
The subject redpiece is on:
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedpieceAbstracts/sg247021.html?Open
Abstract:
"We wrote this redbook to help the reader plan for, install, and configure
the new IBM Lotus Domino 6.5 product on a zSeries platform running Linux
under z/VM
Here is the IBM announcement from yesterday.
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/swnews/swnews.nsf/n/jmae5pvq94
Of course, this is not really news as this was posted on the Domino
6.5 beta site a couple of months ago.
Regards, Jim
> Does anyone have any new information on the Domino port for S390
> Linux? Interest is extremely high here.
> I had responses from one of the technical leads on the project about
> six months ago, but I've not heard much since. What's the word on the
> beta testers prog
Does anyone have any new information on the Domino port for S390 Linux?
Interest is extremely high here.
I had responses from one of the technical leads on the project about six
months ago, but I've not heard much since. What's the word on the beta
testers program?
Thanks for any i
> Is there any new information on the Domino to Linux S/390 - zSeries
> port? Planned release dates? I can't find anything at lotus.com on
> this. ...
Matt:
Here is the official word from Lotus.
Linux on zSeries is a growing and strategically important
platform within th
Have you bugged anyone at IBM lately? This is a hot topic for a number of
customers. I put in the word at LinuxWorld last week and was told that it
was still being looked at.
On Monday 19 August 2002 11:07 am, you wrote:
> Is there any new information on the Domino to Linux S/390 - zSer
gt;
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:07 PM
Subject: Latest work on Domino for s390 Linux?
> Is there any new information on the Domino to Linux S/390 - zSeries port?
> Planned release dates? I can't find anything at lotus.com on this. Any
> way to get in on some pre-release tes
Is there any new information on the Domino to Linux S/390 - zSeries port?
Planned release dates? I can't find anything at lotus.com on this. Any
way to get in on some pre-release testing? I'm sure I could find a place
to install a trial copy, should one be offered, on one of
> Being OS/390 R10 with many AS400's and looking for means to
> cut cost--Linux
> is being looked at, but if was support on or current
> platform--even under
> OMVS we would be interested..This would hold true to many
> Intel/Unix based
> products..
Well, Domino *is* a
Ronald,
I'm not really sure what you're saying here. If you're talking about Domino
specifically, it is supported on OS/390.
If you're not talking about Domino specifically, there are very few Intel
Linux packages that are not available on Linux/390, in the Open Source
Being OS/390 R10 with many AS400's and looking for means to cut cost--Linux
is being looked at, but if was support on or current platform--even under
OMVS we would be interested..This would hold true to many Intel/Unix based
products..
> Being OS/390 R10 with many AS400's and looking for means to cut
> cost--Linux is being looked at, but if was support on or current
> platform--even under OMVS we would be interested..This would hold true
> to many Intel/Unix based products..
Ronald: Domino is fully supported
> How do we know if we want to buy, if we can't kick the tyres? Why not
> produce a "developer release" (like Oracle) and gather feedback? If we
> are to believe all the marketing rhetoric about Linux, it should be a
> matter of just re-compiling the existing Domino
re
to believe all the marketing rhetoric about Linux, it should be a matter of
just re-compiling the existing Domino for Linux-Intel code-base shouldn't
it?
Regards, Mark Darvodelsky,
Royal SunAlliance Australia - Data Centre.
Phone: +61-2-99789081
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CAUTION - This message
l rep, call
> a branch office and ask for one.
Rich: A good summary of the requirement. Lotus/IBM is still reviewing
the business case for Domino on zSeries Linux. At this time no decision
has been made, but it is seriously being looked at. All I can say is
that if you really would buy this (no
nch office and
ask for one.
On Monday 10 June 2002 06:05 pm, you wrote:
> Matt,
>
> This topic comes up from time to time. Although IBM ran a survey
> sometime back, I never heard whether they had any serious intent to port
> Domino to L/390. If someone knows what is up IBM's
> I've no luck in searching for Domino to run on an S/390 Linux virtual
> machine. Does anyone have information on whether there is a Domino
> platform available to run there?
Domino is NOT available for Linux on S/390. IBM is investigating whether
to provide this, but it is no
sonable to consider licensing it, and running
Domino under USS, where IBM claims it is more robust, and has a
better max users/MIPS ratio. They seemed to imply that the
LINUX/390 version of domino would NOT be as robust.
We are still working towards doing LINUX/390 on the Z800(if, and when)
we get one,
Hi Matt,
Domino for Linux/390 is not available...yet. We've heard only that
something might be available next year. Others on this list will no doubt
provide some more details for you. In the meantime the recommended course
of action is to express your interest to IBM-Lotus. The more cust
dicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> paultz
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 7:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
Matt,
This topic comes up from time to time. Although IBM ran a survey
sometime back, I never heard whether they had any serious intent to port
Domino to L/390. If someone knows what is up IBM's sleeve, I would love
to hear their answer.
Regards,
Paul
I've no luck in searching for Domino to run on an S/390 Linux virtual
machine. Does anyone have information on whether there is a Domino
platform available to run there?
Thanks,
Matt Lashley
State of Idaho
002
13:17:31
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:[LINUX-390] Lotus Domino Server for L/390
Maybe it is existing too?
WBR, Sergey
> Maybe it is existing too?
Sergey: If you are asking: Is there a "Lotus Domino for Linux for S/390",
then the answer is not at this time. IBM does understand the requirement.
Regards, Jim
Maybe it is existing too?
WBR, Sergey
Thanks for your responses,
Barry
Rich Smrcina
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
om> cc:
Sent by: Linux onSubject: Re: Domino for Linux on
Well...technically they already do support it on zSeries (OS/390). But they
really need to be convinced that a Linux for zSeries port is necessary (with
all due respect to other vendors... )
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 03:06 pm, you wrote:
> Funny, this here says "all IBM @server platforms" Sh
Funny, this here says "all IBM @server platforms" Should hold them to this
claim :~) Unless they dropped Zseries from the @server line :~)
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/solutions/collaboration/
Regards,
Jon
Jon R. Doyle
Sendmail Inc.
6425 Christie Ave
Emeryville, Ca. 94608
Since R6 is going beta on a number of other platforms (including Linux for
Intel) we may hear some news soon.
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 12:34 pm, you wrote:
> Has anyone heard if a lotus Domino server will run on any flavor of Linux
> for S/390?
> I've got an lpar just
As of September 2001, the last word we had from Jim Elliott was IBM is
"considering a port of Domino to Linux on zSeries. IBM distributed a survey
on this subject some time ago to determine if there was sufficient interest.
Have your IBM rep contact me for a copy of the survey."
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
