Check your screensaver settings. In KDE & Gnome there appear to be
XScreensaver configurations that do power-related things. I'm not sure
how to change screensaver settings in other WM's though.
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 12:47, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA
Perhaps a BIOS setting?
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 12:47, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've got a thinkpad without APM/ACPI installed. I've set 'setterm -blank 0' in
> rc.local, I've set 'xset s off' in .xnitrc, I've turned off DPMS in
> XF86Config, b
Hey all,
I just had an interesting go-round with my newly-upgraded workstation.
I installed 2.6.0-test9 and found my mouse was behaving very strangely.
It jumped around the screen a lot, and the mousewheel was inoperative.
Nothing had changed except the kernel, so I dug into Google a bit and
the
> Did you do an apt-get update before the apt-get upgrade after you
> changed you sources.list file?
>
> If you didn't, apt is still hitting the sid repository instead of the
> experimental.
>
Yes, thankfully I've got the whole update/upgrade thing figured out. It
turned out that what I
Hmm, I wonder how many Debian types we have on this list. There must be
some, I'm sure.
I'm working on getting Debian going on my workstation. Thus far I've
installed Woody and upgraded to Sid. I'm running into trouble with one
thing, though. The version of XFree86 in Sid is still too old to s
I've been using KDE's built-in player myself. Works fine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry McBride
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 9:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: KDE 3.2.0 beta and XMMS problems
Anyone el
This is good software. I use it to keep all the Linux servers on our
campus up to date. It's pretty smart, especially as regards skipping
kernel updates so they can be done by hand (though this is configurable
if you're the 'run it and hope' type).
Collins Richey wrote:
Just found on freshmea
My best guess is its related to the NPTL stuff in the RH9 kernel. Have
you tried exporting LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.2.5 first?
Thanks. I've just tried LD_KERNEL_ASSUME and export it, but still have
the same problem.
Have you downloaded the latest FPSE from MS? The one that comes with
the CD's is
Well, there's one on the SxS site:
http://linux-sxs.org/storage/raid_setup.html
Matthew Carpenter wrote:
btw. Could you provide /etc/lilo.conf examples of soft-raid booting?
Thanks!
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Et
Timpanogas Research Group used to provide NetWare Filesystem support for
Linux. If I understand what happened correctly, they were basically
sued out of existence by Novell. Eventually they sold all assets to the
Canopy Group and went away. If you ask around on the LKML you *may* be
able to
The phone companies tend to be very conservative with distances so it is
indeed possible that another ISP could reach the spot. That said,
however, speed and reliability is always a rapidly diminishing quantity
with distance and line quality. Some DSL equipment will reach 50k feet
with pristine
- Severen as a "community project" could very well devolve into being
little better than the other dozens (nay, hundreds) of half-baked
homegrown distros. Of interest only to the hobbyists.
Quite true, but it's not intended for anyone else so that's OK.
- They are leaving a portion of the market
Michael Hipp wrote:
Collins Richey wrote:
According to the MozillaFirebird page, they are now using GTK2. No
clue abouty
OO.
There must be more to it than that. Unless GTK2 now runs on Windows.
GTK2 does run on Windows, but that's not what they did. They wrote a
set of libraries as part o
bof wrote:
When I load KDE, I am finding that no less than four copies of Kwrite
are also starting. Nothing I am doing will stop this.
I think this is KWrite trying to be 'helpful' and preloading itself for
performance reasons. IIRC KWrite is used as the built-in textfile
viewer for KDE, so i
It is my understanding that if you have Samba set up right and a
filesystem with proper ACL support that your users can modify their
permissions from Windows Explorer just as they would for NT server.
Here's a howto that is supposed to document this. Note that I've never
tried it. :)
http://w
Ben Duncan wrote:
Ok, did that. I have been testing some more.
This GETS weird. All files GOING thru the Laptops ftpd services
take about 4 seconds EACH regardless of size.
ie. a 20MB file transfered in 4 seconds, a 20K file - 4 seconds, a 1K file
4 seconds, and a (GET this !!!) 40 BYTE file - 4 s
Ben Duncan wrote:
It's just that, for SOME REASON, going thru the ftpd on the Laptop, to
upload and it slows to a crawl. Does'nt seem to change no matter which
ftpd service I install - have tried ProFtd, and the BSD ftpd as well.
I am really stumped now.
Wow, this is really a strange one. One s
By way of comparison!
ps aux | grep sylpheed
collins 3393 0.0 1.0 8324 5468 ?S07:03 0:04 sylpheed
Quite so. On my box however sylpheed doesn't support xft (something to
do with GTK configuration?). That is fast becoming a requirement as I
can no longer bring myself to loo
Can you clarify that? Is it worse than Mozilla-1.x? How much RAM are
we talking about here?
ps aux | grep thunder
a 2562 0.0 0.4 4492 1256 ?S12:24 0:00 run-mozilla.sh
a 2568 2.2 13.8 74064 35372 ? S12:24 0:34 thunderbird-bin
a 2569 0.0 13.8 74064 35372 ?
Michael Hipp wrote:
Is it stable enough for everyday use?
It is for me. It's pretty, fast, and stable so far, but a definite RAM hog.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/lin
> > Is your /etc/modules.conf correct with the proper aliases, etc?
> > some mod names have changed. I just modprobe the ones I want anyway
> > via a script.
>
> Yea, the entries in modules.conf are correct, as they work just fine
> for 2.4.21. modprobing via a script will work, but that sounds
> > Wait, didn't they switch to a different file? I think the new
> > kernel uses /etc/modprobe.conf, and a slightly different format to
> > boot. IIRC last time I lived dangerously (2.5.5x) I had to
> > basically recreate the whole thing because the included conversion
> > script didn't work for
Dumb question here ...
Are you guys talking about Mosix http://www.mosix.org/ or openMosix
http://openmosix.sourceforge.net/ ?
Michael
OpenMosix. Mosix switched to a non-OSS license some time ago, so
OpenMosix was developed using the last free version.
_
Haven't been particularly happy with using Konq or Nautilus for such
(they're a "look but don't touch" browser)?
Any recommendations appreciated,
Make sure you've got the latest Konqueror before giving up on it. I've
got 3.1.2 on my office PC and it both reads and writes just fine to
anythin
On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 19:54:44 -0500
Ben Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> emitted these signals:
> I set up a Mosix one about 2 years ago for a trade show.
> Not a problem and I really liked it.
>
Another vote for Mosix. My office workstation is currently a Mosix
cluster. I got tired of my compiles bo
> Sounds the same as our good friends at SCOdera. Of course Caldera did
> have its birth from a bunch of breakaways at Novell.
With one major diff: Novell knows (won't say out loud, but knows) that
NetWare is dead. The only question is whether or not they can shift
NetWare's services to Linux q
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:24:51 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its Novell's dying breath, attempting to find relevancy in a world
> where fileservers are ubiquitous.
>
Maybe not. Novell has a good groupware solution. If they put GroupWise
compatibility into Evo they'll have a
>
> I thought that there was an alsa daemon, alsad, that had to run?
>
Not last time I tried it. It's just a set of kernel modules with their
associated userland utils.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://
> > 1) The packages included were well chosen. There was a little of
> > everything for everyone, and not too much of anything irrelevant
>
> that's subjective Llama (I'm not disagreeing). But how does one define 'well
> chosen' and 'relevant'?
>
It seemed to me that they picked a set of categ
>
> I see I wasn't clear enough. I don't have to do the install.
> Professionals will do that. I only have to choose from the options of
> Slackware or Mandrake. I've never used either, so I have no familiarity.
> I have some reference texts on Red Hat, and I understand that Mandrake is
> clos
On Thursday 24 July 2003 01:04 pm, Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote:
> Folks,
>
> If you had to choose, with only a couple hours to decide, between Slackware
> and Mandrake for a laptop install, which would you choose? I don't know
> either of them well enough to make a logical decision, but I'm in the
But what they fail to recognize is while they focus on Linux, BSD
> is still developing and much of the Linux core which is NOT in question may
> be integrated into the BSD's at any time to provide the additional
> friendliness and HW support that they have been lacking.
This is actually not true.
>
> Again, what business would rely on software and support supplied in
> their spare time by out of work programmers asking for donations? What
> if the pilot-link page just went away? The lack of support for USB PDA's
> by the distros (I would be happy to hear if SUSE or Redhat support USB
> PDA'
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 10:25 am, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I just compiled 2.6.0 and everything works but sound. I configured the
> included ALSA to use my SBLive! and when I rebooted, it errored saying
> 'snd-crd-0: no such module' . I thought "
On Monday 14 July 2003 07:19 pm, Joel Hammer wrote:
> Well, I got the thing to connect and "sync."
> (See the problem below.)
>
> What it took was:
> kernel 2.4.20
> pilot-xfer (from pilot-link version 0.11.7)
>
> And, these two commands:
> cd /root/.jpilot
> pilot-xfer -p /de
On Monday 14 July 2003 06:38 am, Shawn Tayler wrote:
> I'll chime in with Slackware. I've found it to be relatively simple to
> follow the startup on it. Its become my fav.
>
> stayler
>
Last I checked Slack didn't use SysV init. The BSD initscripts would
probably really drive Ben crazy i
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 01:24 pm, Joel Hammer wrote:
> I'll give that a try, but, the program gave some options when I was all
> done with it. One, which I chose, specifically stated that it would create
> a CD readable by any CD reader.
> Joel
By which they mean that a non-burning CD drive will
The easiest way is to do ntp. Make sure the Time Service is started on Win2k
(assuming Win2k Server here, not sure Pro can do this) then set up your ntp
client as you would for Unix timesync. It works the same way.
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 12:20 pm, Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote:
> Folks,
>
> For
>
> Can anyone give me some hints. Why it is behaving like
> this? And how i will be able to connect that disk? I
> need to copy lots more files in that drive..I am
> checking/working on this server remotely because i am
> too far from the server...
>
I suspect your drive is not supported by the
It depends. If I'm doing stuff where I need the whole context (helping with
technical problems or whatever) then top replying and leaving the whole thing
can be the best thing. For other stuff, not so much. So I randomize,
inevitably picking whatever will get the most tomatoes thrown my way i
Aha! Desktop wars! My desktop is the best ever... as long as you've got
512MB RAM!
> > KWrite Rulez! :)
>
> yea, but its embedded in that virus called KDE.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sx
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 11:11 am, Tom Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 13:54, Michael Scottaline wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
> >
> > Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled furiously:
> > > On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
> > > > Could we do editor wars again t
I'll believe it when I see AutoCAD for Linux.
On Friday 27 June 2003 10:43 am, Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 08:36:59AM -0700, Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote:
> ...
>
> >I beg to differ. The latest issue of AIArchitect (American Institute of
> >Architects magazine) has recommended th
Well, it only allows connections from its own subnet by default. That's
actually sensible behavior for a product that's supposed to protect something
as fragile as XP. I'm surprised it was that permissive actually.
On Monday 23 June 2003 05:24 pm, Joel Hammer wrote:
> OK. I found out.
>
> Zone
There may be a firewall module that needs to be loaded in order to correctly
handle ftp. Unfortunately that system is so old that I no longer remember
what said module would be called. Ah, but Google remembers.
http://www.linux.net.nz/lists/NZLUG/2000/06/0086.html
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 03
Yeah, it came out on LinuxToday earlier this month. The vendor kernels appear
to have fixed it, but I don't know of an official kernel patch for the
Marcelo series. I think they just committed the fixes to 2.4.21 since there
doesn't seem to be lots of active exploitation going on.
On Wednesda
> At least now the global community is waking up and asking; Why do we
> have to upgrade every two years?
Of course, then one has to ask Red Hat why we have to upgrade every year as
well, as their patch support for non-Enterprise versions is now only a year.
Linux as a whole (certainly free
XFS isn't in 2.4.x mainline. You'll have to patch your other kernels with the
stuff from SGI.
On Wednesday 02 April 2003 04:11 pm, Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm running a many-boot system on a laptop (trying different flavors to
> compare them) with RedHat 7.2, SuSE 7.3, LFS and r
> >
> > If I ever learn this Linux stuff well enough, maybe I will set it p as a
> > server. Funny, I origionally bought it because I heard the P-Pro's were
> > optimized for Windows NT (which I used in my business). Scary days!
What they meant by that was that PPro did a great job with 32-bit c
I've been working on a new box to function as a failover for my spamfilter
server, and since all the PC's I have handy are junk I grabbed a Blue and
White G3 that was sitting on a shelf. It has a pair of 8GB SCSI drives and
should be fine as a secondary box. I then set it up with a software RA
On Thursday 27 March 2003 06:29 pm, dep wrote:
> begin Collins Richey's quote:
> | The sicko pacifists will puke over this one. The author's site is
> | getting hammered with hits.
> |
> | Some of us support the troops.
>
> you'll find this, then, um, amusing. it is written by the chairman of
>
M... fish...
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 03:22 pm, Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote:
> http://www.sjbaker.org/tux/homertux.html
>
>
> In Harmony's Way, and In A Chord,
>
> Tom :-})
>
> Thomas A. Condon
> Barbershop Bass Singer
> Registered Linux User #154358
> A Jester Unemployed
>
Have you run the checkpc command? That should check your lpr configuration to
see if anything is obviously incorrect.
On Friday 21 March 2003 10:03 am, Susan Macchia wrote:
> Yes I am using LPRng. I looked at /etc/lpd.perms and DEFAULT ACCEPT is the
> last line. I looked on the RH website and
So you're saying that InnoDB on MySQL is somewhat like ext3, an add-on to
existing functionality rather than a fundamental change. This seems to fit
MySQL's place in the market. It is useful for many people, since like ext3
InnoDB works well for basic functionality. It is not an Oracle killer
Something above and beyond the InnoDB transaction support added in the late 3
releases? I'm not a database guru, but I thought they covered at least most
of the transactional stuff at that point.
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 04:01 pm, you wrote:
> ___
> L
>
> Warning: Kernel & BIOS return differing head/sector geometries for
> device 0x81Kernel: 62749 cylinders, 16 heads, 63 sectors
> BIOS: 1023 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors
>
> Lilo still finishes and I'm still able to boot into my gentoo and
> libranet system.
> __
>
> Don't forget the number of people who own Microsoft stock. I can't even
> convince my wife that I would rather invest in outright criminal ventures
> than in Microsoft (yeah I know Microsoft is an OCV but it's hard to
> convince others of this :-).
>
> Bill
Yeah, that was my initial response
Check out http://www.linux-ha.org/ for High Availability clustering info. Of
particular interest is drbd, a network block device that allows you to have
an ethernet-based RAID1 between one box and another.
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 09:20 am, Net Llama! wrote:
> You could use rsync, although
Meaning the built-in XFree drivers work with my GF4. The nvidia drivers would
work as well with previous releases, but since my chipset (KT400) has not to
the best of my knowledge been added into 2.4 the 2.5.x kernel is my only
option. AFAIK the NVidia drivers require 2.4 for their kernel modu
If you don't want your profiles stored on the server then turn off Samba's
profile support. Windows will then store its own profiles locally. If you
turn on profile support in Samba then what you get is roaming profiles.
On Monday 24 February 2003 07:08 am, Brian Witowski wrote:
> Hey all,
>
>
I haven't noticed much difference except that it works properly now with my
GF4. I doubt most users would see a compelling reason to upgrade.
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 09:12 am, Dr. Jones wrote:
> How compelling are the changes to XFree? I am not sure which version I am
> running, but would
Not asking much, eh? ;) Your needs are complex enough that I would seriously
consider an experienced consultant for the switchover. Of course, I'm sure
in this economy that could be tough. It sounds like you're talking about
replacing the whole enchilada. On the server side that might not be
ll.
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:41 am, Aaron Grewell wrote:
> There doesn't appear to be any relationship at all between "Identities" and
> "Accounts" in KMail. They really should fix that, it's irritating.
>
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 04:23 am, Colli
It does look great. One minor niggle: the "and world-wide mirrors" part of
the top-center graphic is not readable at 1600x1200. It comes out too small.
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 06:05 pm, Kurt Wall wrote:
> Feigning erudition, Bob Hemus wrote:
> % tom wrote:
> % >
> % > Greets all,
> % >
>
There doesn't appear to be any relationship at all between "Identities" and
"Accounts" in KMail. They really should fix that, it's irritating.
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 04:23 am, Collins wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:44 pm, Tim Wunder wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:27 pm
At least for Jabber, Kopete seems to do the trick quite nicely and integrates
neatly into KDE 3.x. I haven't used it for other protocols.
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 06:44 am, Tim Wunder wrote:
> On 2/12/2003 9:36 AM, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 February 20
Re: A little chuckle
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 09:27:14 -0800
Aaron Grewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The worst is it's their own fault. If there's a web archive of their
> list I haven't found it.
A simple google "archives gentoo-user" led me to the archiv
PIM. I have 3.1 and do not have
> 'kpilot', id that is the program name.
>
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 09:27:14 -0800
>
> Aaron Grewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The worst is it's their own fault. If there's a web archive of their
> > list I haven'
The worst is it's their own fault. If there's a web archive of their list I
haven't found it. It is at very least badly hidden, if not nonexistent. I
couldn't do due diligence on my questions being dupes if I wanted to. I'm
getting ready to bug them about how the heck I get KPilot installed
This is a common anti-spammer tactic. If the previous caller's
smarthost suggestion doesn't work you'll either need an MX record (sort
of a pain with a dynamic address) or you'll have to find out how to use
comcast's SMTP server directly. Unless they're contracting with MSN
this shouldn't be too
28 at 10:28, Aaron Grewell wrote:
> Have you tried using the Konstruct tool from KDE's site? I've been
> trying to get it to compile using the tool since yesterday, and so far
> it has been kind of a pain. I had some weird XML/XSLT issues that were
> supposed to be fixed b
Have you tried using the Konstruct tool from KDE's site? I've been
trying to get it to compile using the tool since yesterday, and so far
it has been kind of a pain. I had some weird XML/XSLT issues that were
supposed to be fixed by different versions of the libs, but
upgrading/downgrading didn't
r.
>
> cat /proc/pci
>
> might give you more detail.
>
> Joel
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:13:11PM -0800, Aaron Grewell wrote:
> > Figure out which PCI slots are which (each has a number), then try
> > assigning IRQ's to each of your NIC slots and s
Figure out which PCI slots are which (each has a number), then try
assigning IRQ's to each of your NIC slots and see if a higher or lower
IRQ affects the ordering of the ETH settings. I've never tried to
actually specify which is which, but that's how I would try to do it.
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 1
The other thing that may come into play here is that Linux is much more
friendly to non-Unix types. I actually used FreeBSD before I ever
touched Linux. I had no idea what Unix was and I wanted to find out. I
was going to try Linux since I had heard the early rumbles of what I
knew was a massive
I've used both FreeBSD and Linux at different times, and both work well
on the server end. FreeBSD is alleged to be faster and more stable
under load, but I never had any occasion to verify that. Linux has the
advantage of greater third-party support and is much more usable as a
workstation than
I don't think there's much point in creating a Galeon-style browser
based on KHTML. Konqueror itself isn't particularly bloated (especially
compared to Mozilla). The issue is that lots of KDE stuff and lots of
QT stuff is required. I guess if the Apple KDE/QT emulation code got
ported then that
Wow, I've never heard of anyone being able to kill an LJIII. They are
some of the most indestructible printers I've ever seen. The easiest
way (once you've printed a test page to make sure the printer isn't well
and truly dead) is to plug it into a different machine. Use a different
cable as wel
There are several packages that have to be updated for the new kernel to
work properly, some of which are as ever-changing as the development
kernel itself. The ones I remember were e2fsprogs, xfsprogs, procps,
modutils, and alsa-utils. e2fsprogs and xfsprogs were cake, but procps
was big fun. T
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 15:44, Stuart Biggerstaff wrote:
> I think just a couple of things, and you've said this better than...
>
> At 03:14 PM 1/8/03 -0800, Aaron Grewell wrote:
> >Well, let me see if I can get this right. L1 cache is always built into
> >the processor.
out where best to store its
dataset.
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 14:21, Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote:
> Aaron Grewell <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed thusly on Wednesday, January
> 08, 2003 2:17 PM:
>
> > Both are available, but it should be noted that it's on-chip L3 cache.
>
erons wy behind the P4.
> >
> > BTW, There are P4 (as well as PIIIs) with 512kb L2 cache.
> >
> > On 08 Jan 2003 13:20:32 -0800, Aaron Grewell wrote:
> >
> > >The original Celeron had no L2 cache at all. Its performance was so
> > >abysm
ns wy behind the P4.
>
> BTW, There are P4 (as well as PIIIs) with 512kb L2 cache.
>
> On 08 Jan 2003 13:20:32 -0800, Aaron Grewell wrote:
>
> >The original Celeron had no L2 cache at all. Its performance was so
> >abysmal that Intel had to quickly come out with
The original Celeron had no L2 cache at all. Its performance was so
abysmal that Intel had to quickly come out with the Celeron "A" which
includes the 128KB L2 cache we know today. K-6-II and III chips
definitely gave better bang for the buck than the original Celerons, but
the Celeron A was the
Celeron fits into the budget category. Intel has always had these chips
and in the old days they were marked with "sx" (386sx, 486sx). Now
they're called Celerons, and there are several varieties. The only two
you should need to know about are P3 Celerons and P4 Celerons. These
are low-cache va
I hope not. That's a nasty business. The Promise RAID drivers are in
the later kernels but I'm not sure how well they work. My understanding
of the Promise is that most of the work is done by the drivers anyway,
so there's not much advantage over the in-kernel software RAID support.
I would ten
Have you got USB Legacy Support enabled in BIOS? Shouldn't be
necessary, but it might help.
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 10:17, Susan Macchia wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Hope you all had a good holiday. I spent some time trying to get my
> second PC installed with RH 8.0. I had some problems that I was
I'm not sure I understand, but here goes. The different drive letters
are quite normal for the Promise controller. Will it not install once
the RAID is on? That's a kernel support issue, so if Mandrake doesn't
support the Promise RAID setup then you'll have to make a kernel that
does before you
I'd be surprised if dosemu got you anywhere. These bios patchers
usually need to be in protected mode with direct hardware access. Try
making a freedos boot disk and using that. That's how MSI does their
bios boot disks and it seems to work fine. DR DOS should also work,
though I've lost the UR
Which file was it complaining about? It should have told you.
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 14:21, Bonez wrote:
> My kernel source is in /home/scott/kernel/linux-2.4.20.
>
> I copied the xfs patch file to that directory, and when running it with -p1
> the following .log file was generated with one sol
Oops, read failure on my part. You should be able to open the Makefile
and find the KERNELRELEASE= line. Look at the variables and see what's
there. I suspect you may find that EXTRAVERSION has been modified by
your previous kernel patch. Since patch didn't find what it expected (a
blank entry
Try -p1 instead of -p0. If that doesn't work, copy the XFS patch into
the linux-2.4.20 directory and patch from there, first with -p0 and then
with -p1. If that doesn't work, there's a mismatch between the patch
you got and your kernel.
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 13:17, Bonez wrote:
> Here's how I pr
There's no way the USB cradle will work with 2.4.2. USB cradle support
(initially for the Handspring Visor) was added in a much later rev of
2.4.x (x>10, IIRC), and the Palm Tungsten support is probably only in
the very latest, and maybe not even that. I know it's in 2.5, but I
doubt if you reall
Wow. It's hard to imagine a company treating its customers that badly
and expecting them to stick around. I've been extremely lucky I guess.
I've had 2 Asus A7V boards running fine for a couple of years now. I
recently swapped out one of them for an MSI KT4 w/Athlon XP 2000, mostly
because the
I've got a couple of Asus KT133-based boards (running RH8 no less) and
it seems to run fine. Are you using the latest kernel RPM? I had
issues with the shipped kernel that the update solved, though they
weren't on my KT133's. One was even OC'd for a year or so before sudden
stability problems pr
If you're going to do that you'll need to get ACPID and set it up in place of APMD.
Otherwise ACPI isn't going to do much for you. There may also be kernel patches
involved. ACPI has been under very heavy development as it is one of the subsystems
being enhanced in 2.5.x.
http://acpid.source
All their marketing stuff says it's great for streaming...
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 11:03, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
> Perhaps they have some affinity for "flowing"
>
> :)
>
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:10:25 -0800 (PST)
> Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Condon Thomas
Also, memory bandwidth will definitely have an effect. I can't imagine
running this on a box with UMA (onboard video using system RAM) would
work well. The one I've got will barely run X. You'll need a real AGP
card with a decent amount of memory, though there's no need for one of
those fancy hi
XFCE is quite usable (and did I mention blazingly fast?), but different
enough from what she's used to that I'm not sure she'll be happy with
it. You might want to look at Blackbox, which is both fast and familiar
(looks like WinXX). Fixing her panel issues is probably just as simple
as renaming
The important thing about the Tualatin is that it requires a different
mobo due to changes to the core. It's not supported by your average
PIII board. It's also a smoking chip by all accounts. One of the
reasons Intel killed it was that it could easily have cannibalized P4
sales had they ramped
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
