Hi,
I tried to run java org.apache.log4j.performance.Logging with sample1.xml
in the log4j 1.1.2 bundle but got this error. If I change the line
to I'm able to run the test with a
few warning. I've checked the local copy of log4j.dtd and it looks fine,
no typo bug like "logj:configuration". I'v
Hi,
I'm trying to use log4J with servlets (running on weblogic)
When I try to create a category instance inside my servlet,
--
Category cat = Category.getInstance(NameOfTheServlet.class);
--
This causes internal server error. What exactly could be the problem?
I've import
At 01:37 AM 6/13/01 +0200, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
>
>Greetings,
>
>Here is a written critique of JSR47, the logging API shipped with
>JDK 1.4:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique.html
>
>If you agree with its contents, then you are encouraged to send a
>personalized request to
I read t
Hello Chris,
They could at the least change the way parents and children loggers interact. This is
an implementation detail that does not affect the public API of JSR47. If they cannot
accept input from the public, then what's the point of going through the act? Cheers,
Ceki
At 20:04 12.
I don't think so. If Sun is going to ship JSR47 with JDK 1.4, they have to
complete their test cycle. They won't accept anything but minor changes at
this point. Once that's done, I'd guess that a major change (like changing
from the JSR to log4j) will never happen.
Chris
Tivoli Systems
Dept
Hi Pier,
JSR47 is still in the public-review stage. Doesn't that mean that officially
alterations are still possible? Cheers, Ceki
At 00:43 13.06.2001 +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
>Ceki Gülcü at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Here is a written critique of JSR47, the loggi
Ceki Gülcü at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> Here is a written critique of JSR47, the logging API shipped with
> JDK 1.4:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique.html
>
> If you agree with its contents, then you are encouraged to send a
> personalized request to
>
> [EM
Greetings,
Here is a written critique of JSR47, the logging API shipped with
JDK 1.4:
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique.html
If you agree with its contents, then you are encouraged to send a
personalized request to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
asking them to adopt log4j as the logging
The only difference between InheritableThreadLocal and ThreadLocal occurs
when the thread local variable is initialized. Accessing/setting the value is
the same in both cases. Here is a simple example:
public final class SecurityAssociation
{
private static ThreadLocal thread_principal = new
> At 08:33 PM 6/11/2001 Greg Davis wrote:
> >I've noticed an incredible amount of inertia from people who
> don't know a lot
> >about logging but know they need it. The comments usually go
> something like:
> >
> >"Why should I use when there is a
> > logging package in JDK1.4".
>
At 08:33 PM 6/11/2001 Greg Davis wrote:
>I've noticed an incredible amount of inertia from people who don't know a lot
>about logging but know they need it. The comments usually go something like:
>
>"Why should I use when there is a
> logging package in JDK1.4".
I've had to deal a
Title: log4j with JMS
Hi,
I've written a JMSQueueAppender that basically writes to a JMS queue (very similar to the existing JMSAppender which writes to a JMS Topic). My question is : Each time a log request comes through, will new connection, session, and sender objects be created each ti
Dear Log4j Users,
I was hoping the BufferSize property of the SMTPAppender would control the
number of logging events sent in one e-mail message.
As quoted from the Javadocs:
"The number of logging events delivered in this e-mail depend on the value
of BufferSize option".
But it doesn't seem t
Anders,
Thanks for pointing out. Yes, that is basically the same idea. I like Ceki's
idea of using InheritableThreadLocal better. However, does anybody have any
example code showing some usage. I tried to read ThreadLocal as well, and
have not completely grasped the concept.
I also like Ceki's i
This is essentially the same idea that Ceki floated previsouly under the
name "Mapped Diagnostic Context" -- a per-Thread String-to-String map:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4j-dev&m=98051571516266&w=2
It's a good idea but hasn't been implemented yet (to my knowledge).
Cheers,
Anders
S
Hi all,
For last couple of weeks I have been using log4j and is working very well
for our logging needs. Ours is a typical J2EE architecture, with JSP,
servlets, EJB combination.
However, we need some client specific info such as the name of the user who
logged in, client ip address, request ty
John,
My previous answer got sent before your whoops. Whoops. :-)
At 15:51 12.06.2001 -0400, John Volkar wrote:
>Whoops,
>
>Sorry but this got sent before I got Ceki's response. Thanks Ceki! (I thought it
>looked like it should work!)
>
>Regards
>
>John Volkar
>
>-Original Message
John,
The NDC code is well tested. It should work all the time unless one *never* calls
NDC.remove(). I'd be surprised to hear otherwise. Ceki
At 15:48 12.06.2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Hmm,
>
>We are preparing to do some preliminary load testing on our application here, and had
>actually fig
Whoops,
Sorry
but this got sent before I got Ceki's response. Thanks Ceki! (I
thought it looked like it should work!)
Regards
John
Volkar
-Original Message-From: John Volkar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 3:49
PMTo: LOG4J Users Mailing ListS
Hmm,
We are
preparing to do some preliminary load testing on our application here, and had
actually figured on relying on the lazy NDC.remove() behaviour. (We
figured that at least initially it should be good enough.)
Does
it seem to not work 1)at all, or 2)poorly, or what?
I've
lo
At 12:37 12.06.2001 -0500, Wes wrote:
>We just began stress testing our application, and found memory leaks. Eventually, I
>isolated the leak to the NDC push/pop that we were doing in each thread that was
>created. Then, after looking more carefully at the NDC class documentation, I saw
>the
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
>
> Geoff,
>
> My first and foremost criticism on the JSR47 API is the lack of any
> provision for pluggability. The LogManger can be set at application
> initialization time but not the type (class) of the Logger to be used.
My understanding here is that the lead expert fo
We just began stress testing our application, and
found memory leaks. Eventually, I isolated the leak to the NDC
push/pop that we were doing in each thread that was created. Then, after
looking more carefully at the NDC class documentation, I saw the following
regarding the remove method:
At 09:22 12.06.2001 -0700, Shelly Dhiman wrote:
>I want to send the log to Syslog so in my properties file i'm using
>
>log4j.appender.A1=org.apache.log4j.net.SyslogAppender
>log4j.appender.A1.facility=LOG_LOCAL7
>
>I can't see any log in any of the files
>Could you plaese tell me what am i miss
I want to send the log to Syslog so in my properties file i'm using
log4j.appender.A1=org.apache.log4j.net.SyslogAppender
log4j.appender.A1.facility=LOG_LOCAL7
I can't see any log in any of the files
Could you plaese tell me what am i missing here
Shelly
-
Create a file named (ip address.lcf, i.e., 192.216.253.116.lcf. This is the
host that generated the log message and sent to SocketAppender) in a
directory on a machine where SocketServer is running. This file can contain
all the config info. IMHO, this is a good way as you can change the config
wi
Hi all!
I want to use the SocketAppender (because of EJB and avoiding java.io
calling).
I also want to use org.apache.log4j.net.SocketServer to listen to messages.
I want to log to two or more different files. Where do I put the info about
destination files, maxfile size, MaxBackupIndex, Patt
The "PropertyConfigurator.configur()" method doesn't throw an exception and
is of type void, so how do I know that no error occurred ??
That is, I don't wanne continue in my program if this goes wrong but can't
catch this ??
Eddie
---
Hi,
I've installed Log4J on my machine and was able to use it successfully
with simple java programs using simple (txt) and XML based config files.
I would like to know how Log4J is used with Servlets. A sample code
would
be of great help.
Thanks & regards,
Amit
---
Hi to all,
can anybody tell me if log4j if compatible with EJB Specifics (not
thread, not call to java.io)
Thanks a lot
--
Claudio D'Angelo
Software Consultant
ObjectWay S.p.A.
Via G.A. Boltraffio 7
20159 Milano (MI)
http://www.objectway.it
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell.:348-3033663
Numero Ver
Thomas,
By default *most* log4j appenders flush immediately. In particular, the WriterAppender
and its descendants flush an incoming LoggingEvent immediately.
As for the immediateFlush property mentioned by Steffen, it is set to true by default.
The immediate flush behavior can be overridde
Thilo, Steffen,
I strongly discourage you from creating a distinct category for every user. There is a
better way. See my previous mail on the same subject. Ceki
At 11:03 12.06.2001 +0200, Thilo Schottelius wrote:
>Dear Steffen,
>
>one solution would be to create a category for every user:
>
Steffen,
Log4j configurators support variable substitution. Such that
user=foo
log4j.appender.A1.file=/export/home/${user}/logfile.log
will be expanded to
log4j.appender.A1.file=/export/home/foo/logfile.log
Similarly, the system property "user" will be expanded. Let me know if this does not
Hi Thomas,
have you tried the immediateFlush option?
See
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/org/apache/log4j/WriterAppender.htm
l#immediateFlush
Steffen
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Tuft Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 June 2001 09:58
To: LOG4J Users Mailing Lis
Dear Steffen,
one solution would be to create a category for every user:
String user="xyz"
myCat=Category.getInstance("myClass"+user);
Then you can add the file appender for this category concerning to the users
home directory. You may receive the user name from your servlet or via JAVA
call:
Hi,
I've noticed that log-entries is 'hanging' somewhere during tailing of a
log-file. Don't know if it's the internals of log4j or a buffered stream.
Is it possible to flush pending log messages, i.e. force them to be written
to the prevailing appender(s).
--
Thomas
**
Hi!
We are using log4j
with Tomcat. We are currently using multiple instances of Tomcat on one UNIX box
with one properties file. The problem is that we want to log the output
separately for every user in his own directory. So the question
is:
Is there anything
like
log4j.appender.A1.
37 matches
Mail list logo
