Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

On 2014-02-09, Georg Baum wrote: Rainer M Krug wrote: On 02/07/14, 10:49 , Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de wrote: One feature where additional metadata would definitely help are branches. Not necessarily: With use the comment

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

On 02/09/14, 20:25 , Georg Baum wrote: Rainer M Krug wrote: On 02/07/14, 10:49 , Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de wrote: The idea would be that a round-trip framework is envisaged, which provides the facilities to easily expand

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

On 02/07/14, 17:35 , Rob Oakes wrote: Hi all, Hi Rob, good to hear from you on this topic. I have been following conversations with significant interest. I started a new job in the middle of last year. That combined with an 18-month old little boy have left me almost no time for

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

On 02/09/14, 19:44 , Georg Baum wrote: Rainer M Krug wrote: The idea would be that a round-trip framework is envisaged, which provides the facilities to easily expand it from one export backend (docx) to another (possibly odt? markdown?). IMPORTANT: this would NOT change ANYTHING in the

Re: Fwd: Windows uninstaller (v. 2.0.7-installer-1) deletes all icons at uninstall

Uwe Stöhr uwestoehr at web.de writes: Am 30.01.2014 09:03, schrieb Øyvind Anti-spam: It happens only when I install lyx silently, running from an elevated prompt: LyX-2.0.7-Installer-1.exe /S OK, I will have a lokk the next days. I never tested the silent installation. Another LyX

Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

09/02/2014 20:22, Pavel Sanda: Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Pavel Sanda wrote: If it's not too hard it would be nice to have some switch whether or not to sort the entries (the lfun list is not just random). I can do this, but the question remains what we want to have in our manual. IMHO the

Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I have not tried Juergen patch, but I have a couple remarks: * giving the LFUN_ACCENT_ACUTE name is totally pointless: users do not understand it and developers know how to read accent-acute anyway. The file would be much les intimidating with the real names. The

Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: * giving the LFUN_ACCENT_ACUTE name is totally pointless: users do not understand it and developers know how to read accent-acute anyway. The file would be much les intimidating with the real names. The real names are not really accessible from the doxygen

Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

10/02/2014 12:15, Jürgen Spitzmüller: Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I doubt this is possible with the script (which does basically just parse the doxygen comments). Of course we could extend that comments. Well, if DOXYGEN_END was replaced by }, or something like that, the script would have

Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Well, if DOXYGEN_END was replaced by }, or something like that, the script would have access to everything. Oh, I see. I'll have a look. What I would propose, however, is to add some initial paragraph to this manual that explains what lfuns are and how to use

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de wrote: On 02/09/14, 19:44 , Georg Baum wrote: Rainer M Krug wrote: The idea would be that a round-trip framework is envisaged, which provides the facilities to easily expand it from one export backend (docx) to another

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

On 02/10/14, 14:59 , stefano franchi wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de mailto:rai...@krugs.de wrote: On 02/09/14, 19:44 , Georg Baum wrote: Rainer M Krug wrote: The idea would be that a round-trip framework is envisaged,

Re: [patch] Fix bug 8874 Chunk insets behave differently form ERT insets when applying formatting

09/02/2014 15:30, Georg Baum: You mean resetFontEdit() should return return true if isPassThru() returns true? This would certainly make sense, but I am not sure if we should do it now. My proposed patch is conservative in the sense that the behaviour is not changed for any inset except the

Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Well, if DOXYGEN_END was replaced by }, or something like that, the script would have access to everything. Oh, I see. I'll have a look. The attached patch does that (use name as header, sort by FuncType, add short intro). Regards,

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

Guenter Milde wrote: On 2014-02-09, Georg Baum wrote: Rainer M Krug wrote: On 02/07/14, 10:49 , Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de wrote: One feature where additional metadata would definitely help are branches. Not necessarily:

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

On 2014-02-10, Georg Baum wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: On 2014-02-09, Georg Baum wrote: Rainer M Krug wrote: On 02/07/14, 10:49 , Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de wrote: One feature where additional metadata would definitely help

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

Rainer M Krug wrote: On 02/09/14, 20:25 , Georg Baum wrote: This is not possible. There are LyX features that simply do not appear in the exported LaTeX, so they can't be imported (e.g. branches or notes). It might be possible to support all LaTeX features, but the cost would be extremely

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

stefano franchi wrote: Anyway: I am willing to mentor a student through the process of producing a LyX-to-Word semantic-only exporter. Scare quotes are necessary, because I would have to learn as much as the student. If Rob can provide some guidance and expert advice (both as a previous

Copying from pdf (was Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion)

On 11/02/2014 2:59 a.m., stefano franchi wrote: /rantI had to convert a ~50,000 words book from LyX to Word last month and it took me 2 full days. I think I tried all exporters known to men (and women). They all failed to various degrees. In the end, I had better luck converting the file

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

Rainer M Krug wrote: On 02/07/14, 17:35 , Rob Oakes wrote: On another note, you should also probably have a discussion about how you want to handle maths. The math XML vocabulary in docx is pretty well contained, but it would still be an enormous job to translate it to LyX/LaTeX. For

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

On 02/10/14, 21:09 , Georg Baum wrote: Rainer M Krug wrote: On 02/09/14, 20:25 , Georg Baum wrote: This is not possible. There are LyX features that simply do not appear in the exported LaTeX, so they can't be imported (e.g. branches or notes). It might be possible to support all LaTeX

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

I have the feeling, this discussion can be summed up in two lines: 1) we would like to have a round-trip (docx backend) 2) but we need a sematic export (to docx) Rainer On 02/10/14, 21:09 , Georg Baum wrote: Rainer M Krug wrote: On 02/09/14, 20:25 , Georg Baum wrote: This is not possible.

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de wrote: I have the feeling, this discussion can be summed up in two lines: 1) we would like to have a round-trip (docx backend) 2) but we need a sematic export (to docx) Or perhaps: 1) we would like to have a round-trip (docx

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX--docx roundtrip conversion

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.dewrote: stefano franchi wrote: Anyway: I am willing to mentor a student through the process of producing a LyX-to-Word semantic-only exporter. Scare quotes are necessary, because I would have to learn as much as the

problems compiling Lyx for windows

Hi All, on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here: http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL.Win32 to compile Lyx 2.0.7 for windows as I want to modify the (hard coded) icons size, otherwise illegible on my high definition convertible laptop. I have

Re: [patch] Fix bug 8874 Chunk insets behave differently form ERT insets when applying formatting

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Thanks for looking at this. Thanks for the comments, I took all of them into account abnd submitted the patch. Georg

Re: problems compiling Lyx for windows

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Paola paola.manz...@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote: Hi All, on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here: http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL.Win32 to compile Lyx 2.0.7 for windows as I want to modify the (hard coded)

Re: problems compiling Lyx for windows

Paola schreef op 10-2-2014 22:01: Hi All, on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here: http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL.Win32 to compile Lyx 2.0.7 for windows as I want to modify the (hard coded) icons size, otherwise illegible on my high

Re: problems compiling Lyx for windows

On 10/02/2014 21:58, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Paola schreef op 10-2-2014 22:01: Hi All, on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here: http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL.Win32 to compile Lyx 2.0.7 for windows as I want to modify the (hard

Re: Fwd: lyx2.1 and libboost

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:29 AM, hatim dr.ha...@hotmail.com wrote: from: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/daily I don't see Tahr .deb's on there. Using the PPA didn't give an error? Do you mean that you downloaded a .deb file meant for a different Ubuntu version? Liviu, any idea when

Re: [LyX/master] Fix conflicting inset font defaults (bug #8874)

Am 10.02.2014 22:13, schrieb Georg Baum: commit 6b49b6b129af9417fea7ea907a44a46fbbd38340 Author: Georg Baum b...@lyx.org diff --git a/lib/doc/Customization.lyx b/lib/doc/Customization.lyx Hi Georg, when you change something in the docs, please also think of the Japanese version. If you

Re: Questions regarding LyX 2.1

Am 04.02.2014 17:04, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: - open the Math manual you find in LyX 2.1beta - press Ctrl+F (advanced Search) and search for qwert - LyX reaches the end of the document without finding anything and asks you to restart at the beginning. Press Yes - result: about half of

Re: [patch] disable automatic installation of cbgreek package on installation time

Am 04.02.2014 16:23, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: And, don't forget that I added cbgreek as convenience for Windows users so it should be possible to remove it because of problems wit Windows. Why don't you bundle the needed packages with the installer then ? You know that this

Re: Help KDE-Edu: WYSIWYG editor for math expressions

Percy Camilo Trive??o Aucahuasi wrote: categories to refine this compromises? or, can you suggest us the basic sequence for our possible iterations (e.g. which features should we tackle first; and so on)? Maybe you'll find this thread interesting.

Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: The first name is the LFUN_ version, normalized to look like the text versiopn. Shall we rename the enums to match the function names or do the opposite? Or do nothing? I'd say go for the first option. renaming the function names is not a good idea, since

Re: Fwd: lyx2.1 and libboost

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:29 AM, hatim dr.ha...@hotmail.com wrote: from: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/daily I don't see Tahr .deb's on there. Using the PPA didn't give an error? Do you mean that you

Re: problems compiling Lyx for windows

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Paola Manzini paola.manz...@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote: On 10/02/2014 21:58, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Paola schreef op 10-2-2014 22:01: Hi All, on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here:

Re: Fwd: lyx2.1 and libboost

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote: Liviu, any idea when we will have Tahr support in the PPA? I now set the daily recipes for Tahr; they should build shortly. OK, now I tried that, and the build does fail with a (different) error: make[1]: Entering

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

On 2014-02-09, Georg Baum wrote: > Rainer M Krug wrote: >> On 02/07/14, 10:49 , Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote: > One feature where additional metadata would > definitely help are branches. Not necessarily: With use the

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

On 02/09/14, 20:25 , Georg Baum wrote: > Rainer M Krug wrote: > >> On 02/07/14, 10:49 , Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote: >>> The idea would be that a round-trip framework is envisaged, which provides the

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

On 02/07/14, 17:35 , Rob Oakes wrote: > Hi all, Hi Rob, good to hear from you on this topic. > > I have been following conversations with significant interest. I > started a new job in the middle of last year. That combined with an > 18-month old little boy have left me almost no time for

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

On 02/09/14, 19:44 , Georg Baum wrote: > Rainer M Krug wrote: > >> The idea would be that a round-trip framework is envisaged, which >> provides the facilities to easily expand it from one export backend >> (docx) to another (possibly odt? markdown?). >> >> IMPORTANT: this would NOT change

Re: Fwd: Windows uninstaller (v. 2.0.7-installer-1) deletes all icons at uninstall

Uwe Stöhr web.de> writes: > > Am 30.01.2014 09:03, schrieb Øyvind Anti-spam: > > > It happens only when I install lyx silently, running from an elevated > > prompt: LyX-2.0.7-Installer-1.exe /S > > OK, I will have a lokk the next days. I never tested the silent installation. Another LyX

Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

09/02/2014 20:22, Pavel Sanda: Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Pavel Sanda wrote: If it's not too hard it would be nice to have some switch whether or not to sort the entries (the lfun list is not just random). I can do this, but the question remains what we want to have in our manual. IMHO the

Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I have not tried Juergen patch, but I have a couple remarks: > > * giving the LFUN_ACCENT_ACUTE name is totally pointless: users do not > understand it and developers know how to read accent-acute anyway. The > file would be much les intimidating with the real names.

Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > * giving the LFUN_ACCENT_ACUTE name is totally pointless: users do not > > understand it and developers know how to read accent-acute anyway. The > > file would be much les intimidating with the real names. > > The real names are not really accessible from the

Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

10/02/2014 12:15, Jürgen Spitzmüller: Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I doubt this is possible with the script (which does basically just parse the doxygen comments). Of course we could extend that comments. Well, if DOXYGEN_END was replaced by "}," or something like that, the script would have

Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Well, if DOXYGEN_END was replaced by "}," or something like that, the > script would have access to everything. Oh, I see. I'll have a look. > > What I would propose, however, is to add some initial paragraph to this > > manual that explains what lfuns are and how

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote: > > > On 02/09/14, 19:44 , Georg Baum wrote: > > Rainer M Krug wrote: > > > >> The idea would be that a round-trip framework is envisaged, which > >> provides the facilities to easily expand it from one export backend > >>

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

On 02/10/14, 14:59 , stefano franchi wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Rainer M Krug > wrote: > > > > On 02/09/14, 19:44 , Georg Baum wrote: > > Rainer M Krug wrote: > > > >> The idea would be that a round-trip

Re: [patch] Fix bug 8874 Chunk insets behave differently form ERT insets when applying formatting

09/02/2014 15:30, Georg Baum: You mean resetFontEdit() should return return true if isPassThru() returns true? This would certainly make sense, but I am not sure if we should do it now. My proposed patch is conservative in the sense that the behaviour is not changed for any inset except the

Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Well, if DOXYGEN_END was replaced by "}," or something like that, the > > script would have access to everything. > > Oh, I see. I'll have a look. The attached patch does that (use name as header, sort by FuncType, add short intro).

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2014-02-09, Georg Baum wrote: >> Rainer M Krug wrote: >>> On 02/07/14, 10:49 , Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote: > >> One feature where additional metadata would >> definitely help are branches. >

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

On 2014-02-10, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2014-02-09, Georg Baum wrote: >>> Rainer M Krug wrote: On 02/07/14, 10:49 , Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote: >>> One feature where additional metadata

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

Rainer M Krug wrote: > On 02/09/14, 20:25 , Georg Baum wrote: > >> This is not possible. There are LyX features that simply do not appear in >> the exported LaTeX, so they can't be imported (e.g. branches or notes). >> It might be possible to support all LaTeX features, but the cost would be >>

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

stefano franchi wrote: > Anyway: I am willing to "mentor" a student through the process of > producing a LyX-to-Word semantic-only exporter. Scare quotes are > necessary, because I would have to learn as much as the student. If Rob > can provide some guidance and expert advice (both as a previous

Copying from pdf (was Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion)

On 11/02/2014 2:59 a.m., stefano franchi wrote: I had to convert a ~50,000 words book from LyX to Word last month and it took me 2 full days. I think I tried all exporters known to men (and women). They all failed to various degrees. In the end, I had better luck converting the file from the

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

Rainer M Krug wrote: > On 02/07/14, 17:35 , Rob Oakes wrote: >> >> On another note, you should also probably have a discussion about how >> you want to handle maths. The math XML vocabulary in docx is pretty >> well contained, but it would still be an enormous job to translate it >> to

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

On 02/10/14, 21:09 , Georg Baum wrote: > Rainer M Krug wrote: > >> On 02/09/14, 20:25 , Georg Baum wrote: >> >>> This is not possible. There are LyX features that simply do not appear in >>> the exported LaTeX, so they can't be imported (e.g. branches or notes). >>> It might be possible to

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

I have the feeling, this discussion can be summed up in two lines: 1) we would like to have a round-trip (docx backend) 2) but we need a sematic export (to docx) Rainer On 02/10/14, 21:09 , Georg Baum wrote: > Rainer M Krug wrote: > >> On 02/09/14, 20:25 , Georg Baum wrote: >> >>> This is not

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote: > I have the feeling, this discussion can be summed up in two lines: > > 1) we would like to have a round-trip (docx backend) > 2) but we need a sematic export (to docx) > Or perhaps: 1) we would like to have a round-trip

Re: GSOC 2014 project list: on LyX<-->docx roundtrip conversion

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > stefano franchi wrote: > > > Anyway: I am willing to "mentor" a student through the process of > > producing a LyX-to-Word semantic-only exporter. Scare quotes are > > necessary, because I would have to learn as

problems compiling Lyx for windows

Hi All, on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here: http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL.Win32 to compile Lyx 2.0.7 for windows as I want to modify the (hard coded) icons size, otherwise illegible on my high definition convertible laptop. I have

Re: [patch] Fix bug 8874 Chunk insets behave differently form ERT insets when applying formatting

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Thanks for looking at this. Thanks for the comments, I took all of them into account abnd submitted the patch. Georg

Re: problems compiling Lyx for windows

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Paola wrote: > Hi All, > > on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here: > > http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL.Win32 > > to compile Lyx 2.0.7 for windows as I want to modify the (hard

Re: problems compiling Lyx for windows

Paola schreef op 10-2-2014 22:01: Hi All, on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here: http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL.Win32 to compile Lyx 2.0.7 for windows as I want to modify the (hard coded) icons size, otherwise illegible on my high

Re: problems compiling Lyx for windows

On 10/02/2014 21:58, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Paola schreef op 10-2-2014 22:01: Hi All, on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here: http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL.Win32 to compile Lyx 2.0.7 for windows as I want to modify the (hard

Re: Fwd: lyx2.1 and libboost

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:29 AM, hatim wrote: > from: > https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/daily I don't see Tahr .deb's on there. Using the PPA didn't give an error? Do you mean that you downloaded a .deb file meant for a different Ubuntu version? Liviu, any idea

Re: [LyX/master] Fix conflicting inset font defaults (bug #8874)

Am 10.02.2014 22:13, schrieb Georg Baum: commit 6b49b6b129af9417fea7ea907a44a46fbbd38340 Author: Georg Baum diff --git a/lib/doc/Customization.lyx b/lib/doc/Customization.lyx Hi Georg, when you change something in the docs, please also think of the Japanese version. If you

Re: Questions regarding LyX 2.1

Am 04.02.2014 17:04, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: - open the Math manual you find in LyX 2.1beta - press Ctrl+F (advanced Search) and search for "qwert" - LyX reaches the end of the document without finding anything and asks you to restart at the beginning. Press Yes - result: about half of

Re: [patch] disable automatic installation of cbgreek package on installation time

Am 04.02.2014 16:23, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: And, don't forget that I added cbgreek as convenience for Windows users so it should be possible to remove it because of problems wit Windows. Why don't you bundle the needed packages with the installer then ? You know that this

Re: Help KDE-Edu: WYSIWYG editor for math expressions

Percy Camilo Trive??o Aucahuasi wrote: > categories to refine this compromises? or, can you suggest us the basic > sequence for our possible iterations (e.g. which features should we tackle > first; and so on)? Maybe you'll find this thread interesting.

Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > The first name is the LFUN_ version, normalized to look like the text > > versiopn. Shall we rename the enums to match the function names or do > > the opposite? Or do nothing? > > I'd say go for the first option. renaming the function names is not a good > idea,

Re: Fwd: lyx2.1 and libboost

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:29 AM, hatim wrote: >> from: >> https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/daily > > I don't see Tahr .deb's on there. Using the PPA didn't give an error? > Do you mean that

Re: problems compiling Lyx for windows

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Paola Manzini wrote: > > On 10/02/2014 21:58, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> >> Paola schreef op 10-2-2014 22:01: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here: >>> >>>

Re: Fwd: lyx2.1 and libboost

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: >> Liviu, any idea when we will have Tahr support in the PPA? >> > I now set the daily recipes for Tahr; they should build shortly. > OK, now I tried that, and the build does fail with a (different) error: make[1]: