Le 24/06/2022 à 08:28, Dr Eberhard Lisse a écrit :
He did address it by complete path prefixed by python2.
I would think the scrip itself uses python3 and therefor works.
I saw that indeed.
Thanks,
JMarc
el
On 2022-06-21 12:06 , Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 20/06/2022 à 15:28, Rudi
He did address it by complete path prefixed by python2.
I would think the scrip itself uses python3 and therefor works.
el
On 2022-06-21 12:06 , Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 20/06/2022 à 15:28, Rudi Gaelzer a écrit :
That successfully converted the original to format 544, which the
frontend
On terça-feira, 21 de junho de 2022 13:27:12 -03 José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> This is problematic on so many levels. :-)
> Notice that your python2 is using python3's standard library and so the
> disaster is unavoidable.
>
> Something is wrong with your python2 installation because that should n
On Tuesday, 21 June 2022 17.06.00 WEST Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Are you sure that you do not have another file names "lyx2lyx"
> somewhere? "locate" may be able to determine that.
>
> JMarc
It is unlikely because lyx always knows the relative location of lyx2lyx.
So even if there are two lyx
On Tuesday, 21 June 2022 13.44.01 WEST Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> Hits a snag right at the beginning:
>
> rudi@stix|Plasma Modes>python2 /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx Langmuir-
> lyxformat-508.lyx > /dev/null
> File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/site.py", line 93
> print(message, file=sys.stderr)
>
Le 21/06/2022 à 14:39, Rudi Gaelzer a écrit :
lyx2lyx is a python script. How do I verify the path for python scripts?
It is not in the paths for shell commands, listed by which.
According to dnf, the only package that provides lyx2lyx is
lyx-common-2.3.6.1-6.fc36.noarch
Are you sure that you
On segunda-feira, 20 de junho de 2022 13:44:47 -03 José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> If you still have the 508 format file could you run:
>
> $ python2 /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -lyxformat-508.lyx >
> /dev/null
>
> The only difference from your command above is that this is running the
> convert
On terça-feira, 21 de junho de 2022 07:06:28 -03 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 20/06/2022 à 15:28, Rudi Gaelzer a écrit :
> > That successfully converted the original to format 544, which the frontend
> > was able to render.
> > Is it possible that there's a bug in the automagic process?
> > I'm
Le 20/06/2022 à 15:28, Rudi Gaelzer a écrit :
That successfully converted the original to format 544, which the frontend was
able to render.
Is it possible that there's a bug in the automagic process?
I'm running the installation from the rpm packages distributed for Fedora core
35/36.
Could it
On Monday, 20 June 2022 14.28.18 WEST Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> That worked. First, I copied the original .lyx to
> -lyxformat-508.lyx, then ran
> $>/usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -lyxformat-508.lyx -o .lyx
>
> That successfully converted the original to format 544, which the frontend
> was able to r
On sexta-feira, 17 de junho de 2022 08:08:04 -03 José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 June 2022 18.19.22 WEST Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> > I'm trying to open a LyX file with an older format:
> > \lyxformat 508
> >
> > But I got the error message: LyX: Conversion script failed
> > It says that th
On Wednesday, 15 June 2022 18.19.22 WEST Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> I'm trying to open a LyX file with an older format:
> \lyxformat 508
>
> But I got the error message: LyX: Conversion script failed
> It says that the lyx2lyx script failed to convert the document.
>
> What should I do in this case?
On 6/15/22 13:19, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I'm trying to open a LyX file with an older format:
\lyxformat 508
But I got the error message: LyX: Conversion script failed
It says that the lyx2lyx script failed to convert the document.
What should I do in this case?
You can try running lyx2lyx on the s
I'm trying to open a LyX file with an older format:
\lyxformat 508
But I got the error message: LyX: Conversion script failed
It says that the lyx2lyx script failed to convert the document.
What should I do in this case?
--
Rudi Gaelzer
Physics Institute - UFRGS
BRAZIL
Registered Linux user # 15
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Rich Shepard wrote:
Slackware-14.2/x86_64. I've reinstalled all packages that were in the
system before I borked it, but I must still be missing one. The newest
gzipped build log is attached. I don't see what's missing.
My apologies to all; I think my brain hasn't thawed f
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Can you tell me again what system this is? You should make sure that you have
all tools for building qt5 apps.
JMarc,
Slackware-14.2/x86_64. I've reinstalled all packages that were in the system
before I borked it, but I must still be missing o
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Can you tell me again what system this is? You should make sure that you
have all tools for building qt5 apps.
J-Marc,
Slackware-14.2/x86_64.
Do you have a command named moc5, for example? (BTW moc is a helper
program used by Qt to preprocess
On 2/21/21 12:50 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 17/02/2021 à 22:51, Rich Shepard a écrit :
>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>>> The build log says:
>>> == The found moc compiler is for Qt 4.8.7 but the Qt library version
>>> is 5.12.8.
>>
>> JMarc,
>>
>> Yes, I saw that
Le 17/02/2021 à 22:51, Rich Shepard a écrit :
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The build log says:
== The found moc compiler is for Qt 4.8.7 but the Qt library version
is 5.12.8.
JMarc,
Yes, I saw that and have no idea what 'moc' is. Also, I run Python3 here
and
have both
On 2021-02-21 06:29, Daniel wrote:
On 2021-02-17 21:22, Rich Shepard wrote:
I've had to rebuild lyx-2.3.6.1 and not before have I had a problem like
this. There's apparently a missing library or other dependency and I
don't
see what it is when I look at the build log (attached).
Please let me
On 2021-02-17 21:22, Rich Shepard wrote:
I've had to rebuild lyx-2.3.6.1 and not before have I had a problem like
this. There's apparently a missing library or other dependency and I don't
see what it is when I look at the build log (attached).
Please let me know what's missing.
Rich
Maybe r
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 05:09:59PM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > Just to try something different, do you feel like trying the cmake build?
> > Let us know if you want instructions for how to use cmake.
>
> Scott,
>
> I can try that. Since I switch
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Just to try something different, do you feel like trying the cmake build?
Let us know if you want instructions for how to use cmake.
Scott,
I can try that. Since I switched from Red Hat-7 to Slackware-8.0 in 2003
I've built Lyx using the SlackBuild
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 04:32:48PM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Rich Shepard wrote:
>
> > Did that and had the same result.
>
> I don't see a different issue in the build log with --enable=qt5 in the
> config options. That build log is attached.
Just to try something differe
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Rich Shepard wrote:
Did that and had the same result.
I don't see a different issue in the build log with --enable=qt5 in the
config options. That build log is attached.
Rich
lyx-build.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The build log says:
== The found moc compiler is for Qt 4.8.7 but the Qt library version is
5.12.8.
You might want to use --enable-qt5 as configure option.
JMarc,
Did that and had the same result.
More thoughts and suggestions needed.
Than
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The build log says:
== The found moc compiler is for Qt 4.8.7 but the Qt library version is
5.12.8.
JMarc,
Yes, I saw that and have no idea what 'moc' is. Also, I run Python3 here and
have both qt-4.8.7-x86_64-4 and qt5-5.12.8-x86_64-1_SBo ins
Le 17/02/2021 à 21:22, Rich Shepard a écrit :
I've had to rebuild lyx-2.3.6.1 and not before have I had a problem like
this. There's apparently a missing library or other dependency and I don't
see what it is when I look at the build log (attached).
Please let me know what's missing.
Rich
The
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, Hartmut Haase wrote:
what does configure say?
Hartmut,
The SlackBuild script calls for:
./configure \
--prefix=/usr \
--libdir=/usr/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX} \
--sysconfdir=/etc \
--localstatedir=/var \
--mandir=/usr/man \
--docdir=/usr/doc/$PRGNAM-$VERSION \
--ena
what does configure say?
Am 17. Februar 2021 21:22:44 MEZ schrieb Rich Shepard
:
>I've had to rebuild lyx-2.3.6.1 and not before have I had a problem
>like
>this. There's apparently a missing library or other dependency and I
>don't
>see what it is when I look at the build log (attached).
>
>Plea
I've had to rebuild lyx-2.3.6.1 and not before have I had a problem like
this. There's apparently a missing library or other dependency and I don't
see what it is when I look at the build log (attached).
Please let me know what's missing.
Rich
lyx-build.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed da
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Wild guess:
moc_FileMonitor.cpp:13:2: error: #error "This file was generated using the
moc from 4.8.7. It"
#error "This file was generated using the moc from 4.8.7. It"
^
The "moc" binary that you have in the path is from Qt 4.8.7, and the Qt
Le 01/12/2020 à 01:20, Rich Shepard a écrit :
Somehow, at some time since 3.5.3.2 was released I managed to lose by lyx
build directory on my Slackware-14.2/x86_64 workstation. I restored it and
downloaded lyx-2.3.6.tar.xz but trying to build it fails when a 'build-all'
command cannot be found.
Somehow, at some time since 3.5.3.2 was released I managed to lose by lyx
build directory on my Slackware-14.2/x86_64 workstation. I restored it and
downloaded lyx-2.3.6.tar.xz but trying to build it fails when a 'build-all'
command cannot be found.
The complete output is attached.
I've looked a
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
There's no such system-wide file. It's your file that's being used. LyX
only stores the filename, and searches both the user- and
system-directories for it.
Riki,
I've it all figured out now. The UI file used on the 32-bit host (the
soon-to-be
On 8/20/19 11:57 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> I'm migrating to a new server/workstation and now I FUBAR'd lyx so it
> does
> not load.
>
> While looking in preferences to see if I could set the default window
> size
> there (for a 1250x1024 dpi monitor) I did not find an appropriate
> setting.
> But I
I'm migrating to a new server/workstation and now I FUBAR'd lyx so it does
not load.
While looking in preferences to see if I could set the default window size
there (for a 1250x1024 dpi monitor) I did not find an appropriate setting.
But I did see that the UI file was a system-wide one rather th
Just to clarify #2, when you say "compile" you mean File > Export
(as opposed to View), correct? If you click the viewer button or use
the View menu to generate a PDF, LyX automatically opens the PDF in
the designated viewer program (intended behavior).
Paul
On 08/31/2016 03:48 PM, Joon Ro wrote:
Hi,
I have been using LyX 2.2.1 for a while, and I found the following two
issues:
1. Saving a document frequently gives me an error saying that it
failed to move the temporary copy to the original one. I end up
getting multiple temporary files
Hi,
I have been using LyX 2.2.1 for a while, and I found the following two issues:
Saving a document frequently gives me an error saying that it failed to move
the temporary copy to the original one. I end up getting multiple temporary
files such as filename-aZ7872.lyxI'm using SumatraPDF as my p
Dear Friends of LyX,
in the preamble I entered:
\usepackage{ifthen}
\renewcommand{nomgroup}[1]{%
\ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{A}}{\item[\textbf{Roman Symbols}]}{%
\ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{G}}{\item[\textbf{Greek Symbols}]}{%
\ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{C}}{\item[\textbf{Abbreviations}]}{%
\ifthenelse{\e
2014-11-10 14:40 GMT+01:00 Graham Smith:
> Hello Jurgen,
>
> Sorry for the delay in replying, I missed your response.
>
> It won't compile because of R code chunks which have been altered.
>
> What was originally:
>
>
> [image: Inline images 1]
>
> has been changed to:
>
> [image: Inline images 2]
Graham Smith wrote:
> I am trying to open a file in 2.1.2, which is about a year old (last
> opened 30th October 2013, as I update it annually), but not sure which
> version of Lyx it was last edited in.
>
> I am getting an error that the file was created in an older version of lyx
> and the lyx2
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 08/24/2014 11:58 PM, Jim Rockford wrote:
>
>> I'm getting some strange behavior in exporting a Lyx file to the Open
>> Office format (Windows 7, Lyx version 2.1.1)
>>
>> I get a message indicating that the export was successful, but no fil
On 08/25/2014 06:46 AM, raymond lam wrote:
Hi,
I am using the latest version of Lyx and my uni pc is in version
2.0.3. When I am trying to open the Lyx documen I created from my
laptop in my university pc. a error pop out an said:
Document format failure:
C:\Users\myusername\AppData\Local
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:46 AM, raymond lam wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using the latest version of Lyx and my uni pc is in version 2.0.3. When
> I am trying to open the Lyx documen I created from my laptop in my
> university pc. a error pop out an said:
> Document format failur
On 08/24/2014 11:58 PM, Jim Rockford wrote:
I'm getting some strange behavior in exporting a Lyx file to the Open
Office format (Windows 7, Lyx version 2.1.1)
I get a message indicating that the export was successful, but no file
emerges, at least not in the present working directory. It's as
Hi,
I am using the latest version of Lyx and my uni pc is in version 2.0.3.
When I am trying to open the Lyx documen I created from my laptop in my
university pc. a error pop out an said:
Document format failure:
C:\Users\myusername\AppData\Local\Temp\lyx_tmpdir.Hp4252
I'm getting some strange behavior in exporting a Lyx file to the Open
Office format (Windows 7, Lyx version 2.1.1)
I get a message indicating that the export was successful, but no file
emerges, at least not in the present working directory. It's as if I did
nothing.
The seemingly most relevant
x internals.
>
I'm maintain the culmus-latex package, so this failure is of interest to
me. Where there any errors when running the installation script related to
the updmap command?
I'm aware of at least one possible failure there (
http://www.guyrutenberg.com/2012/04/20/installing-c
I'm checking with Fedora guys to see who's responsible for the package as
it seems like a bad configuration error.
If that's the case we can avoid further posting, but maybe add it in
general for the knowledge base (in case someone would encounter the error
in the future).
Thanks & Nice weekend,
M
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Mordechai Butrashvily
wrote:
> Good news.
> Apparently the map file was not configured properly.
> All fonts are ok, and after running updmap-sys --enable in the correct
> folder, solved all issues.
> It's time to get more familiar with Lyx and Latex internals.
Gr
Good news.
Apparently the map file was not configured properly.
All fonts are ok, and after running updmap-sys --enable in the correct
folder, solved all issues.
It's time to get more familiar with Lyx and Latex internals.
Scott, do you still think it's worth to add to wiki?
If so, I'll be glad to
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Mordechai Butrashvily
wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> First, thanks. I was aware to this website and many others which I tried to
> follow.
>
> It seems like a more intrinsic issue here, as the same document worked fine
> previously, and on a new system it lacks something (
Hi Scott,
First, thanks. I was aware to this website and many others which I tried to
follow.
It seems like a more intrinsic issue here, as the same document worked fine
previously, and on a new system it lacks something (and all other
documents with Hebrew text using culmus). Writing documents i
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Mordechai Butrashvily
wrote:
> Hello friends,
>
> It seems like the last resort I can refer too with these matters.
> Please accept my apology if it's not the first time a question like this is
> asked, but the more you try the more you learn (hopefully).
> Searchi
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> I do not trust patient related data or important data onto a server
> I do not have control over.
>
This depends, of course, on the sensitivity of the data. Dropbox isn't
secure enough for just about anything. SpiderOak seems to take a
I do not trust patient related data or important data onto a server
I do not have control over.
My MacMinis at the practice and at home each have Time Machine
running and talk to each other with Unison.
My MacBookAir talks to the one at home with Unison, anytime I open
or close it, and before and
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> I do all important stuff with Version Control, synchronize with Unison
> to at least two other machines, and all have Time Machine running, the
> Airbook however not as frequently as the other two.
>
For automatic (and very frequent) ba
Hi el,
Thanks for your advice. I will definitely need to use some sort of backup
for my coming thesis.
Best regards,
VNK
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> I do all important stuff with Version Control, synchronize with Unison
> to at least two other machines, and a
I do all important stuff with Version Control, synchronize with Unison
to at least two other machines, and all have Time Machine running, the
Airbook however not as frequently as the other two.
Similar mechanisms exist for Windoze and Linux.
el
On 9/17/11 5:11 PM, VNK wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I'
On 09/17/2011 04:11 PM, VNK wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I've done what you said. The problem is solved. Thank you.
>
> Best regard,
> VNK
If the problem repeats itself please warn us. We take the file format
integrity seriously.
As Richard said this is quite unusual and so the suspect is a corruptio
t's call it
> "Lab1.lyx".
> Today, when I open that file, I get the error:
>
>> *LyX: Document Format Failure: Lab1.lyx ended unexpectedly, which means
>> that it is probably corrupted*
>
> This is the screenshot of the error
> http://imghost.ucoz.org/uploa
On 09/17/2011 03:18 AM, VNK wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Yesterday, I used LyX to compose my lab report normally, let's call it
> "Lab1.lyx".
> Today, when I open that file, I get the error:
>
> *LyX: Document Format Failure: Lab1.lyx ended unexpectedly, w
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 3:07 PM, VNK wrote:
> I do not dare to try the solution you provided. Anyway, thanks for your
>
You could always experiment on a backup copy. But hopefully someone
more familiar with the file format will chip in.
Liviu
hat I get
> when opening from a terminal on Linux:
>
> liv@liv-laptop:/tmp$ lyx-svn Lab1.lyx
> Paragraph ended in line 5187
> Missing \end_layout.
> Paragraph ended in line 5306
> Missing \end_layout.
> Error: Document format failure
>
&g
.
>
They're not needed to check how it opens in LyX. This is what I get
when opening from a terminal on Linux:
liv@liv-laptop:/tmp$ lyx-svn Lab1.lyx
Paragraph ended in line 5187
Missing \end_layout.
Paragraph ended in line 5306
Missing \end_layout.
Error: Document format failure
I open
the lyx file with notepad++ and delete most of the sections containing
figures, I can open it without error.
Best regards,
VNK
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 9:18 AM, VNK wrote:
> >> LyX: Document Format Failure: Lab1.lyx end
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 9:18 AM, VNK wrote:
>> LyX: Document Format Failure: Lab1.lyx ended unexpectedly, which means that
>> it is probably corrupted
>
[..]
> I'm using Windows 7 32-bit, LyX 2.0.3
>
I suppose you come from the future, since the last LyX stable is
2.
Hi everyone,
Yesterday, I used LyX to compose my lab report normally, let's call it
"Lab1.lyx".
Today, when I open that file, I get the error:
> *LyX: Document Format Failure: Lab1.lyx ended unexpectedly, which means
> that it is probably corrupted*
This is the screens
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2011-07-10, Michael Joyner wrote:
>
>> I tried inserting any and all of the following into my document and the
>> results do not show up in the output. :(
>
>> ⚀⚁⚂⚃⚄⚅⠁⠃⠇⠏⠛⠟⠯⠿⡯⡿⢿⣽⣿✘✗✦
>
I am using xelatex mode with a Cherokee Glyphed set o
On 2011-07-10, Michael Joyner wrote:
> I tried inserting any and all of the following into my document and the
> results do not show up in the output. :(
> ⚀⚁⚂⚃⚄⚅⠁⠃⠇⠏⠛⠟⠯⠿⡯⡿⢿⣽⣿✘✗✦
LyX supports ca. 2400 out of ca. 15000 Unicode symbols if used with
"traditional" LaTeX (latex, pdflatex).
If more c
I tried inserting any and all of the following into my document and the
results do not show up in the output. :(
⚀⚁⚂⚃⚄⚅⠁⠃⠇⠏⠛⠟⠯⠿⡯⡿⢿⣽⣿✘✗✦
I have attached sample file and PDF.
--
---
- Learn to speak Cherokee: http://www.cherokeelessons.com/
- Cherokee Language Help BBS/Chat:
http://www
Create a LyX document which uses underline and export as Latex. Now
import the Latex document. The underline is not 'swallowed' by LyX and
shown as underline, but remains in ERT. Also, the document doesn't
compile. However, if another word is now underlined, then the document
does compile, and
On 20 Apr 2011, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> I found that Lyx was not generating the index with at least two files I
> tried it on.
>
> After a lot of experimentation I managed to get an index using a
> semi-manual method:
>
> 1. Export the file as latex (luatex and possibly other formats work).
> 2
I found that Lyx was not generating the index with at least two files I
tried it on.
After a lot of experimentation I managed to get an index using a
semi-manual method:
1. Export the file as latex (luatex and possibly other formats work).
2. Run latex on myfile.tex (did it twice)
3. Run makeinde
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Gustaf Arrhenius
wrote:
> Dear Lyx-team
>
>
>
> I’ve just downloaded Lyx and tried out the first supposedly super-easy
> tutorial. It failed and I got a obscure error message, see attached. I’m
> afraid that such errors at such an early point will discourage a lot
First try with lyx 2.0.0alpha5 of xetex. Log is attached. Failure is
! Undefined control sequence.
l.67 \ExplSyntaxOn
This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9997.4 (TeX Live 2011/dev)
(format=xelatex 2010.11.9) 9 NOV 2010 08:20
entering extended mode
restricted \write18 enabled.
%&-
On Monday 25 January 2010 16:13:30 Stefano Franchi wrote:
> I am trying to open a lyx file produced by a conversion script and
> Lyx (1.6.5) fails claiming lyx2lyx could not convert it.
> The lyx file is in lyx format 2.16 (or so it claims in its header).
>
> Launching lyx2lyx from the console gi
I am trying to open a lyx file produced by a conversion script and
Lyx (1.6.5) fails claiming lyx2lyx could not convert it.
The lyx file is in lyx format 2.16 (or so it claims in its header).
Launching lyx2lyx from the console gives the following error:
Warning: An error ocurred in 225,
Traceb
In all the years I've used LyX I've never seen this before: while checking
the spelling of my document, a message box popped up reading, "The
spellchecker has failed. No word lists can be found for the language
'latex'."
The last word checked (which I had added to my personal spelling
diction
On Friday 13 March 2009 15:41:48 Stefano Franchi wrote:
> Dear Lyxers,
>
> I am trying to convert a batch of old documents written with
> Framemaker into LyX. There is a nifty little utility that allows the
> conversion and I have used it successfully in the past (mif2lyx). However,
> it ha
Dear Lyxers,
I am trying to convert a batch of old documents written with Framemaker
into
LyX. There is a nifty little utility that allows the conversion and I have
used it successfully in the past (mif2lyx). However, it has not been
maintained since 2000 and it produces lyx files in t
C++ Compiler: g++ (3.3.4)
You've a fairly old version of g++. Maybe upgrading gcc might solve the
problem ?
Vincent
Thanks, I installed gcc-4.3.2 locally and ... LyX compiled successfully
(even without re-compiling Qt beforehand).
If the error was due to the old compiler
>> C++ Compiler: g++ (3.3.4)
You've a fairly old version of g++. Maybe upgrading gcc might solve the
problem ?
Vincent
Hi everybody,
making lyx 1.6.0 on Suse 9.2 with a local install of Qt 4.4.3 fails with
"Menus.cpp:85: error: forward declaration of `struct
lyx::frontendMenuDefinition'" (see more output of make below).
Same error comes up if I try compiling it against Qt 4.3.2 (I had used
this Qt instal
> Qt: 4.4.0 (compiled by me
i guess this will be the problem :)
maybe the following link can help you
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212086#c6
pavel
Hello. I've not been able to compile LyX 1.5.5. The error
is that reported in bugs 4499 and 4734, caused by
forward declaration of struct QSessionManager.
I had the same problem with LyX 1.5.4
and Qt 4.3.4. It occurs with the target
make all.
Qt: 4.4.0 (compiled by me - no
configuration
Hello
I'm not able to create a .deb package with checkinstall,
on Ubuntu Hardy amd64.
Here is the tail of 'make check':
PASS: test_convert
FAIL: test_filetools
PASS: test_lstrings
1 of 3 tests failed
Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I Just made it work on a Windows XP machine like this,
>From the LyX for windows faq, I learned you can open a dos box and run
lyx -dbg 3
and that lets you see the error messages and such. If I were using
windows, I would always start LyX that way. From the errors I see
there, it appears to me a
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Andrew Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Using Lyx 1.5.2 and MiKTeX 2.5 on XP. I am trying to use the Sweave
> to create literate-article documents. I haven't found great
> documentation for how to do this on a windows install, but I have
> pieced
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Andrew Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using Lyx 1.5.2 and MiKTeX 2.5 on XP. I am trying to use the Sweave
First question that comes to me: what version of R are you using?
Liviu
Hi all,
Using Lyx 1.5.2 and MiKTeX 2.5 on XP. I am trying to use the Sweave
to create literate-article documents. I haven't found great
documentation for how to do this on a windows install, but I have
pieced together the following steps, that ultimately fail when I try
to produce any layout by
our advice, then LyX read it perfectly, no lyx2lyx
> > failure.
> >
> > I have other LyX files on the removable disk (created with 1.5.3 on
> > Ubuntu) which open with no problems. I don't quite follow the details
> > of what is happening, but if I copy the
G. Jay Kerns wrote:
Thanks! As it turns out, when I copied the file from my removable
SanDisk to follow your advice, then LyX read it perfectly, no lyx2lyx
failure.
I have other LyX files on the removable disk (created with 1.5.3 on
Ubuntu) which open with no problems. I don't quite f
G. Jay Kerns wrote:
Dear Paul,
Thanks! As it turns out, when I copied the file from my removable
SanDisk to follow your advice, then LyX read it perfectly, no lyx2lyx
failure.
I have other LyX files on the removable disk (created with 1.5.3 on
Ubuntu) which open with no problems. I don&#
Dear Paul,
Thanks! As it turns out, when I copied the file from my removable
SanDisk to follow your advice, then LyX read it perfectly, no lyx2lyx
failure.
I have other LyX files on the removable disk (created with 1.5.3 on
Ubuntu) which open with no problems. I don't quite follow the de
G. Jay Kerns wrote:
Dear LyX users,
I am in the process of graduating from Windows to Linux. I installed
LyX 1.5.3 on an Ubuntu Gutsy using the Synaptic Package Manager.
Now it seems that I cannot open any of my old LyX files (<= 1.5.2).
It says that "(Myfile) came from an earlier version of L
Dear LyX users,
I am in the process of graduating from Windows to Linux. I installed
LyX 1.5.3 on an Ubuntu Gutsy using the Synaptic Package Manager.
Now it seems that I cannot open any of my old LyX files (<= 1.5.2).
It says that "(Myfile) came from an earlier version of LyX, but
lyx2lyx failed
Jim Burton schrieb:
I'm unable to open a file created in a 1.5.x version of Lyx in my older
one (1.4.3).
You need to export your file in LyX 1.5.x as LyX-file in the format of LyX 1.4.x. The resulting file
gets then the file extension ".lyx14" and this can you can open with LyX 1.4.x.
regar
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
