Hi there,
I'm a new user to modperl, actually just trying to get it installed. I
installed it under my own directory ( I don't have root privs for the
machine ) fine, but when I start apache up it finds an old Apache.pm
(the one the sys admin installed), I need it to find mine the one that I
ins
RH supplied RPMs suck, please read the mailing list archive it was
discussed many time already. Grab the statically built RPM from
perl.apache.org.
> Hi all.
>
> I just installed modperl 1.21 with apache 1.3.9, both are custom RPMs
> that are basically based on the Red Hat RPMs (we just chang
At 00:28 -0700 99.12.5, Michael Dearman wrote:
> David Emery wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > Personally, I think the name mod_perl should be kept, and mod_perl hackers should
>start referring to themselves as "The Mod Squad". A logo could be created based on
>the shape of Linc's hair from the Mod
> Hi there,
>
> I'm a new user to modperl, actually just trying to get it installed. I
> installed it under my own directory ( I don't have root privs for the
> machine ) fine, but when I start apache up it finds an old Apache.pm
> (the one the sys admin installed), I need it to find mine the on
Mod_Perl Friends,
I'm writing from Tellme Networks, a start-up based in Palo Alto,
California. Check us out at http://www.tellme.com/.
Building a great team is the most important thing I do. We're looking to
hire someone (either full-time or as a consultant) who has experience
building web applic
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Lately, ScreamDesign has changed its policy regarding OSS and because of
>that mod_perl SourceGarden is looking for a new home. We would like to
>thank ScreamDesign for hosting our project for the last half a year,
>especially Pat and Philip who provi
Hi again, all,
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Victor Zamouline wrote:
> So, a company hiring VB developers knows that these are humble and
> obedient guys who will make the application work, even if an extra
> semicolon will ruin the whole program. And that is perfectly OK with
> such companies because the
Hi all,
On Sat, 4 Dec 1999, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> Just putting in use strict and -w doesn't cut it. There's a load of
> gotchas that people just have to understand and learn on top of Perl
> skills.
Too true. This is a topic in its own right. I believe that mod_perl
could be made into an
> > So when I spread the mod_perl word, I make sure I don't make my client
> > hire another bunch of VB programmers after what I told them about
> > mod_perl during the training. :)))
>
> Hang on, fellas, isn't this getting a bit unnecessarily evangelist?
> Tools like mod_perl are just that. Too
Yet Another Well Funded Startup
Company: DigitalWork.com
location: Chicago, IL
company: E-Commere B2B startup, probably largest true startup in Chicago
assets: 4 rounds of funding, VC's include Draper, Fisher Jurvetson
culture: startup -- stock options, pool table, stock options,
Although I like mailing lists, I am beginning to see a pattern.
A list becomes useful at around 5-20 daily contributions. At
around 30+, I glaze over and skip tons of stuff, wishing it
would end already. modperl is well over that limit, and I now
have to unsubscribe just to keep my day productiv
Suddenly, James G Smith uttered:
> "Victor Zamouline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >6) Eagle with a single red-blue-yellow feather in its wing, proposed by
> >Salve Nilsen
>
> I think I've kept up with the thread, but I may have missed a post
> or two. If I'm repeating, please forgive me.
>
>
Suddenly, James G Smith uttered:
> "Victor Zamouline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >6) Eagle with a single red-blue-yellow feather in its wing, proposed by
> >Salve Nilsen
>
> I think I've kept up with the thread, but I may have missed a post
> or two. If I'm repeating, please forgive me.
>
>
> > Talk to SourceForge which is sponsored by VA Linux Systems.
> >
> > http://www.sourceforge.com/
> >
> > I don't think they currently support mod_perl, but I bet they can be
> > convinced if you ask nice.
>
> Funny, the sourcegarden is a very similar service to sourceforge, but we
> want it
Suddenly, Stas Bekman uttered:
> Hi, folks
>
> You wouldn't beleive but I receive a great deal of mod_perl job offers.
> Here is a partial quote of the most generic content of the offer:
*Sigh*
Lots of jobs in the US, but none in Norway... :(
I've been lurking on this list a little while and
I think whenever you get advocacy posts then you see a flurry of posts.
If you don't like those types of posts, you usually pretty quickly
identify them by topic (currently it is the mod_perl programmers are in
demand subject line).. and can filter out...Delete delete delete...
I may be wrong, bu
> I think whenever you get advocacy posts then you see a flurry of posts.
> If you don't like those types of posts, you usually pretty quickly
> identify them by topic (currently it is the mod_perl programmers are in
> demand subject line).. and can filter out...Delete delete delete...
>
> I may
=
1. Known propositions for the name/symbol of Mod_Perl
=
1.1. Animals (independent symbols)
--
1.1.1. Eagle, proposed by Ged Haywood. Copyrighted by O'Reilly,
Victor Zamouline wrote:
>
> >Talking about "let's do something" topics on the mod_perl list is a waste
> >of time, unfortunately... The motto of this list regarding new things is
> >"think it, implement it and give it"...
>
> This is somewhat too straightforward, Stas. Look - I only suggested
I've been watching this thread for a week now.
I find the content rather tiresome and wish that there were more
discussion of technical issues related to using mod_perl as there used to
be on this list. But on the other hand I am pleased to see some new names
on the list that apparently belong
Salve J Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Suddenly, James G Smith uttered:
>> "Victor Zamouline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >6) Eagle with a single red-blue-yellow feather in its wing, proposed by
>> >Salve Nilsen
>>
>> I like this idea, but I'm seeing the Eagle from the mod_perl book in
>> g
I might as well pile on :-)
At TimeBills.com (www.timebills.com) we are looking for smart,
talented mod_perl/perl developers to help us build a complete suite of
small business applications.
We are location in Boston (Back bay for now, moving to South Station
in January). Seed funded and in the
Stas is right, I've been mass-deleting the "logo" and "demand" threads for
several days, resulting in a quite manageable list. The nice thing is, you
can always search the archive if you accidentally delete something (and you
*should* search the archive before posting, anyway, as well as check th
Have to be honest and say that compared to other mailing lists I'm on, this
one is the most professional and personal I've seen.
>From: Eric Strovink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: mod_perl list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Mailin
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Anthony Gardner wrote:
> Have to be honest and say that compared to other mailing lists I'm on, this
> one is the most professional and personal I've seen.
Thank you. From all of us, I'm sure.
On a technical (if not topical) point it would ease network traffic
and the pre
On Sat, 4 Dec 1999, Autarch wrote:
> I don't remember if this has been discussed before but anyway. If you're
> running Redhat 6.0 (and maybe 6.1?)
Just this moment installed a RH-6.1 system. It did not exhibit this
problem.
> there may be some weirdness when you
> try to install modperl. Bas
> On Sat, 4 Dec 1999, Autarch wrote:
>
> > I don't remember if this has been discussed before
> but anyway. If you're
> > running Redhat 6.0 (and maybe 6.1?)
>
> Just this moment installed a RH-6.1 system. It did
> not exhibit this
> problem.
fwiw, my install of RH6.0 didn't have this proble
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 09:41:03AM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "Tim" == Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Tim> I presumed (I've not looked) that it would reload the new interpreter
> Tim> in the same way that the original one was and thus would reload modules
> Tim> in the sa
I encountered a problem using Apache::StatINC with modules that have the
directive:
use base qw( SomeClass );
The error I got was the following:
[Mon Dec 6 07:35:47 1999] [error] Inherited %FIELDS can't override existing %FIELDS
at /usr/lib/perl5/5.0050 3/base.pm line 73
BEGIN failed--compi
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Tim Bunce wrote:
> I guess I could add something like this:
>
> DBI->default_connect_method("Apache::DBI::connect");
>
> which Apache::DBI could call, after a "use DBI;", to get itself
> plugged in.
that would be great, cos ive wanted to be able to supply my
own conne
Tim Bunce wrote:
> > I've always thought the "must load Apache::DBI before DBI" thing was a
> > bit weird anyway. Can't you just make it a flag that DBI looks at
> > that Apache::DBI sets?
>
> The idea was to avoid run-time overhead by setting things up a
> compile time.
>
> I guess I could ad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeffrey W. Baker) wrote:
>IMHO Apache::DBI causes more problems than it solves with it's
>"transparent" replacement of DBI functions. Can anyone point to an
>example where a subclass of DBI would not do everything that Apache::DBI
>does, except without the headaches?
Yes, here
Ken Williams wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeffrey W. Baker) wrote:
> >IMHO Apache::DBI causes more problems than it solves with it's
> >"transparent" replacement of DBI functions. Can anyone point to an
> >example where a subclass of DBI would not do everything that Apache::DBI
> >does, except
"Jeffrey W. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ken Williams wrote:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeffrey W. Baker) wrote:
> > >IMHO Apache::DBI causes more problems than it solves with it's
> > >"transparent" replacement of DBI functions. Can anyone point to an
> > >example where a subclass of D
Hello,
I am a newbie modperl'er and I am tyring to get system calls to return data
to modperl (via stdout). Based on what I have read, sfio need to be linked
in. Has anyone successfully done so and does stdout gets directed properly.
Anyone with success out there: can you share with me how yo
35 matches
Mail list logo
