Was typing mine before I read this Paul, maybe respond later, brain hurts.
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Jun 2015, at 13:50, Paul Gerrard
0060c3f9be9c-dmarc-requ...@listserv.american.edu wrote:
Rich,
With the pressbook I was thinking more of the distributor name on the
pressbook
Exactly. As has been proved in this thread, there was a public announcement
when 'Lion Films International' was formed in September 1955. To me, it is
entirely out of the question that this name could've been used anytime before
this date.
Helmut
I think Threadgall may just have been
Rich,
With the pressbook I was thinking more of the distributor name on the
pressbook itself. Poster images may help as well, but as you say, more of a
guideline, since they might not have finalised every single detail before
compiling the pressbook, and it might not be an exact copy
Neither the quad, 3-sht, domestic 1-sht or International are offset, they're
hand drawn/stone litho.
The disputed International is different plates to domestic 1-sht.
My understanding is they reused those plates (for different posters.)
So if saved (for 6+ years) what were created for
David,
just curious: At this point, do you have any doubt that this poster was printed
in 1955 or later? In my view, it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that
the production company listed on the Bidll poster did not exist before 1955.
Also, back in the days, rent was cheap, but the
I’d just like to say I’m impressed by the research capabilities of MOPO as a
group. Fun to see folks working together on something they love. It unleashes
genius.
Alan
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
Indeed, it's been a blast, it never ceases to amaze me the depth of
knowledge of so many who are willing to share it too.
That said, it will be good when it is all over and we can go back to the
adverts.
:P
regards,
*David Rew
[mob] 0402 925 158*
bidll.com
The same number B.L. 838 can be seen on the domestic onesheet sold by Heritage.
Fact remains that the distributor of the Bidll poster did not exist before
1955, so it seems that the original plates were edited and re-used for this
poster. IF the Bidll poster had indeed been printed in 1949, it
I'm pretty certain they didn't reuse the original plates.
While obviously very similar, it's a different rendering.
Other than changes to text, if you look at the detail the images are
illustrated differently throughout.
Subtle, but the variances can't be down to differences caused by separate
Did Greg give any indication of what the number might look like if it were
a re-release? Would Stafford Co issue a new one (or blank it out)? I
hate to differ from Greg, as he obviously has a load of experience in this
area. I bought some of my first posters from him all those years
Indeed, Richard.
As was discussed prior, the art of the bidll piece is not the same as
the HA '49 copy.
The are 2 different critters.
On Jun 26, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Richard C Evans wrote:
I'm pretty certain they didn't reuse the original plates.
While obviously very similar, it's a
Unfortunately I have not heard back from Greg as yet to my follow up
email where I asked about the (actual) number on this poster or his
opinion on the re-release question, I do not know him at all so could
not be too forward in chasing him up. I did provide him with a link to
the MoPo
Well said, Helmut. Points are worth pondering.
And the omitted (deleted) production /London Film Co, logo and name
(the text at the top of the poster) still makes no sense, were it
from the 1st release --- international / territory release or not.
Questions, questions, that's for sure.
Just had an email back from Greg Edwards in the UK (Rare Film Posters),
who I asked after a suggestion from John Reid and Vesna (from the thread
on Vintage Movie Posters Forum
http://vintagemoviepostersforum.com/discussion/1108/rare-english-one-sheet-the-third-man/p1)
- I told him the queries
.From: David RewSent: Thursday, 25 June 2015 11:45To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDUReply To: David RewSubject: Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)
Just
Phew, the cavalry arrived.
Quad is B.L. 833.
I believe rather than 49, release year for Third Man was 50.
BIDL looks to be B.L. (three figures).
Game still on.
Phew, almost waved the white flag last night after the Big Bruce email.
On 25 Jun 2015, at 11:44, David Rew wrote:
Just had an
power to him and
to people like him. -d.
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 06:39:18 +1000
From: shadow@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Really? Is this about what EMP does when they discover they've made
another mistake
with Grey since day one of his auctions buying and selling posters.
Philipp
Sent from my iPhone
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:45:54 -0700
From: jpotok...@ca.rr.com
Subject: Re: [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man
(1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
I wrote to Bruce to ask his
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:45:54 -0700
From: jpotok...@ca.rr.com
Subject: Re: [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
I wrote to Bruce to ask his thoughts on this poster and discussion. He wrote
me back and also said I could post his reply
The number at the bottom of this The Third Man UK poster currently
listed on BIDLL http://bidll.com/Listing/Details/420722 is
*B.L. 838*
regards,
*David Rew
[mob] 0402 925 158*
bidll.com
for serious collectors
https://www.facebook.com/bidll Follow us
customers applaud. More power to him and to people
like him. -d.
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 06:39:18 +1000
From: shadow@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Really? Is this about what EMP does when they discover
Subject: Re: [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
I wrote to Bruce to ask his thoughts on this poster and discussion. He wrote me
back and also said I could post his reply to MOPO:
Jeff
I personally think it is very likely that it is from 1955
I wrote to Bruce to ask his thoughts on this poster and discussion.
He wrote me back and also said I could post his reply to MOPO:
Jeff
I personally think it is very likely that it is from 1955 or so.
Here is why:
IMDb only lists a handful of films from Lion International. But
because
Now ... this is what I refer to as a hi-res' pic of a poster.
ad
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:58 AM, David Rew da...@bidll.com wrote:
Just wanted to offer this follow-up.
As you know I had written to Mr Peter Snell owner of CEO of British Lion
Film in the hope he might be able to help with
All this has been very interesting, but I wonder how it affects the
question of value. In general, however, is a rare re-release poster worth
more than an original release poster which is fairly easily obtainable?
Tommy
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Helmut Hamm texasmu...@web.de wrote:
I
I must admit that I have somewhat lost track about the back and forth around
this poster. However, the information that Paul has dug up can hardly be
contradicted:
http://www.archive.org/stream/motionpicturedai78unse#page/n481/mode/2up/search/%27lion+international+films%27
Motion Picture Daily
According to chap at Canal relating to Third Man, British Lion distributed
internationally. (Under what name?)
And accounts of Woolf's IFD have them utilising Lion International from 1950.
Since Lion didn't distribute in the USA prior to 55, then presumably, once they
started to in 55 after
Richard,
THE THIRD MAN was originally released in Germany by 'Deutsche London Film' in
1950. The first re-release must've been around 1956, and the poster still shows
this company as distributor. By the end of 1956, they either changed names or
went out of business.
It would make sense that
And shot thru some nice, soft diffusion, too.
:)
On Jun 23, 2015, at 5:46 AM, allen day wrote:
Now ... this is what I refer to as a hi-res' pic of a poster.
ad
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:58 AM, David Rew da...@bidll.com wrote:
Just wanted to offer this follow-up.
As you know I had written
That’s why I think the Lion International is relevant, but not as relevant as
the absence of the London Film logo. To use another rule that is not applicable
all of the time: on original release the info of the production company is
always there, while on rereleases the distributor info is
Under London Films International for the 1st release (an offshoot of
London Films who owned British Lion), according to the Sydney Herald article
that David posted.
I originally had the same sort of doubts as you, and that’s why I
researched backwards to try and find if the Lion
I don't know, is the original UK release easily obtainable? HA is the
only one on record who has sold the original back in 2006 for US$5,750
in comparison the BIDLL one http://bidll.com/Listing/Details/420722
has a starting bid of just USD$2,750
David
Tommy Barr wrote on 24/06/2015 12:32
Just wanted to offer this follow-up.
As you know I had written to Mr Peter Snell owner of CEO of British Lion
Film in the hope he might be able to help with the puzzle of the poster.
Although he did not respond directly to me he did kindly pass on my
email to Studio Canal to respond. For
Hi All
Well as you know our NZ based collector and seller of this rare poster
on BIDLL http://bidll.com/Listing/Details/420722has been following the
conversations on MoPo with much interest, and although he did not ask me
to pass on this message I felt I would let you know that he said: /
It's really good of them to reply so quickly. However, I should point out
that the 1st image you attached is not a quad, but (most of) a first
release US Half Sheet style B.
The 2nd image is a really nice one of the original quad though.
Paul
_www.movieposterstudio.com_
It’s in Ed Harris’ Britain’s Forgotten Film Factory: The Story Of Isleworth
Studios. 2012.
And also Derek Threadgall’s 1994 British Film Institute publication, Shepperton
studios: an independent view.
Which Ed Harris may have got it from.
Just spotted, thanks to that humongous Third Man quad
Rich, Without looking at these in detail, you also have to take domestic
distributors into account. For example, British Lion distributed Third Man
and Fallen Idol (produced by London Films) domestically, hence Lion logo on
quads. It's all very complicated when British Lion are owned by
Good Morning all!
Once again my beauty sleep has worked wonders for my skin, the wrinkles
have fallen to one side, which has made me a little blind in one eye as
I see I have a lot of reading.
Well if nothing else I have enjoyed the hunt and the excellent resources
that have been used and
David,
It appears Lion International was indeed created in 1955, just after the
old British Lion collapsed with Korda’s London Films and was resurrected
under new ownership. Some brief columns in the Sept 21, Nov 15 and Dec 2
editions of Motion Picture Daily 1955 describe the set-up of the
As i noted earlier about the start of Lion International:
You can find it here: http://www.screenonline.org.uk/film/id/457344/
and here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Lion_Films. Granted it
does not say that Lion Internantional Flms started then, but it's
clear that the
Sure there's room for margin/error there, but then again the London
Film logo is on the one vetted original British onseheet.
Op 22 jun 2015, om 15:30 heeft Richard C Evans het volgende geschreven:
Think this is a lesson for not putting too much faith in the logic
of what's printed on
If this is accurate then IFD (Independent Film Distributors) was using Lion
International from 1950.
(IFD apparently existed 50-59.)
Think this is a lesson for not putting too much faith in the logic of what's
printed on posters.
Quads for Third Man, Fallen Idol, and Small Back Room, have London and Lion
logos.
Lion logo not on Third Man 1 and 3 sheet.
Likewise, Fallen Idol 1-sheet, 6 sheet just the London Films logo.
That is why I think it is telling that the London Film logo, basically
Alexander Korda's signature, is not on the poster in question whilst
it is on the few posters I resarched up and until Korda's last
production Richard III.
I must admit though that the info on the several depots of
10 smartphone.
From: Richard C Evans
Sent: Saturday, 20 June 2015 18:06
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Reply To: evan...@mac.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The
Third Man (1949)
The unfavourable scenario (presumably no one is thinking
fake), is that it could
that way.
Simon
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
*From: *Richard C Evans
*Sent: *Saturday, 20 June 2015 18:06
*To: *MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
*Reply To: *evan...@mac.com mailto:evan...@mac.com
*Subject: *Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet
the last time Heritage sold this poster which was
five years ago, they listed it as an early 1950's re-
release and it sold for $900.
Todd Feiertag
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:38:07 +1000
From: da...@bidll.com
Subject: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The
Third Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L
: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:38:07 +1000
From: da...@bidll.com mailto:da...@bidll.com
Subject: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The
Third Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
An exciting find has just been listed on BIDLL by a known
: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:38:07 +1000
From: da...@bidll.com mailto:da...@bidll.com
Subject: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The
Third Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
An exciting find has just been listed on BIDLL by a known
English One Sheet - The
Third Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
An exciting find has just been listed on BIDLL by a known
New Zealand based collector.
For overseas buyers please note - the currency is in NZ$ -
that's almost chicken feed in most other countries!
Good luck
sold this poster which was five
years ago, they listed it as an early 1950's re-release and
it sold for $900.
Todd Feiertag
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:38:07 +1000
From: da...@bidll.com
Subject: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third
Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
+1000
From: da...@bidll.com mailto:da...@bidll.com
Subject: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third
Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
An exciting find has just been listed on BIDLL by a known New
Zealand based
mailto:da...@bidll.com
Subject: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man
(1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
An exciting find has just been listed on BIDLL by a known New
Zealand based collector.
For overseas buyers please note
Apparently, British Lion Films Ltd. was formed in January 1955, after the
owners of London Films encountered some financial troubles. I believe that
'Lion International Films' as a division of London Films existed before that.
Helmut
The only slight question mark in my mind is whether Lion
That's so odd, isn't it? With all the internetsites available, we can't say
categorically when a subsidiary of an important company started.
Wim
Op 20 jun 2015, om 17:40 heeft Paul Gerrard het volgende geschreven:
Different companies! Eagle-Lion was Rank as you correctly say; but Lion
] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)
Thanks Paul
Some incredibly valuable insight I appreciate you sharing, I've learned
something. So, essentially the dig is on to find out about Lion International.
Hopefully Richard Evans can share more, unless the send button on his phone get
: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man
(1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
An exciting find has just been listed on BIDLL by a known New
Zealand based collector.
For overseas buyers please note - the currency is in NZ$ - that's
almost chicken feed in most other
Helmut,
Not sure what you intended with this follow-up message, but just to avoid
confusion:
You're right that British Lion Films Ltd was (re-)created in 1955 as a new
limited company when Korda went bust, but as you said in your previous
message British Lion as a company existed long
True, but information like this proves to be so important. And there so much
more info on lots of older stuff available. By the way wikipedia states that a
controlling share of British Lion was bought in 1946 by London Films. Then in
1955 LF went into receivership and British Lion Films Lt.d
What about the British Film Institute - worth a call to them don’t you think -
given their trade papers, info and resources.
Alan
Please Visit Our New Website:
WWW.MUSEUMOFMOMANDPOPCULTURE.COM
And Our Ebay Store:
http://stores.ebay.com/Museum-Store-Gifts
On Jun 20, 2015, at 8:52
Unfortunately the internet wasn't around in the 1940s ;)
Paul
_www.movieposterstudio.com_ (http://www.movieposterstudio.com)
In a message dated 20/06/2015 16:52:33 GMT Daylight Time,
w...@bqjansen.demon.nl writes:
That's so odd, isn't it? With all the internetsites available, we can't
Different companies! Eagle-Lion was Rank as you correctly say; but Lion
International was part of London Films/British Lion. It's just that we can't
be 100% sure when Lion International started...
Paul
_www.movieposterstudio.com_ (http://www.movieposterstudio.com)
In a message dated
Just my silly joke. Yes, you're right there's a lot of information out
there - perhaps too much sometimes - it's just the tracking down, the
collating, and filtering out the misinformation. Not always easy - especially
with
the speed of my broadband connection!
Paul
In a message dated
The unfavourable scenario (presumably no one is thinking fake), is that it
could be an International RR?
(Prior to that horrible RR which is based on it. I think based on the actual
printed poster, and no connection to original plates.)
Would they bother doing it for International RR?
English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)The unfavourable scenario (presumably no one is thinking fake), is that it could be an International RR?(Prior to that horrible "RR" which is based on it. I think based on the actual printed poster, and no connection to original plates.)Would they bo
Entirely possible Wim. It’s just another conjecture. Personally though I’d lay
more money out for the one that appeared at HA.
Simon
From: Wim Jansen
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 7:04 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man
To: evan...@mac.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The
Third Man (1949)
The unfavourable scenario (presumably no one is thinking fake),
is that it could be an International RR?
(Prior to that horrible RR which is based on it. I think based
on the actual printed poster
Reply To: evan...@mac.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)
The unfavourable scenario (presumably no one is thinking fake), is that it
could be an International RR?
(Prior to that horrible RR which is based on it. I think based on the
actual
Seems very sound, based on that information (if the wiki info is
correct, that is). And as mentioned before.. why would a second plate/
art be done for an international release OS? The art is very similar
to the HA copy, but it is NOT the same. Why go to that added creative
trouble and
I wrote to one of the people I know at the BFI a day or so ago asking if
they could help shed some light, I am waiting to hear back - as an
aside, they own a Quad for the film, not a UK1SH
I also wrote to Peter Snell, CEO of British Lion (yes, I used Google to
find him/the company) but
of info that sways me into thinking
that way.
Simon
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Richard C Evans
Sent: Saturday, 20 June 2015 18:06
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Reply To: evan...@mac.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949
that sways me into thinking that way.
Simon
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Richard C Evans
Sent: Saturday, 20 June 2015 18:06
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Reply To: evan...@mac.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third
Man (1949)
The unfavourable
As London Films went bust in 1955 and Lion International Films was set up as a
distribution company in January 1955 (surely wikipedia is right on this one) I
am sorry to say it’s almost sure to be a re-release. Why should London Films
take off their logo for an international issue? Or are there
*To: *MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
*Reply To: *evan...@mac.com mailto:evan...@mac.com
*Subject: *Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The
Third Man (1949)
The unfavourable scenario (presumably no one is thinking fake),
is that it could
:06
*To: *MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
*Reply To: *evan...@mac.com mailto:evan...@mac.com
*Subject: *Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third
Man (1949)
The unfavourable scenario (presumably no one is thinking fake), is
that it could
my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Richard C Evans
Sent: Saturday, 20 June 2015 18:06
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Reply To: evan...@mac.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The
Third Man (1949)
The unfavourable scenario (presumably no one is thinking fake
with that sort of info that sways me into
thinking that way.
Simon
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Richard C Evans
Sent: Saturday, 20 June 2015 18:06
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Reply To: evan...@mac.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The
Third Man
that way.
Simon
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Richard C Evans
Sent: Saturday, 20 June 2015 18:06
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Reply To: evan...@mac.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The
Third Man (1949)
The unfavourable scenario (presumably no one
.
Simon
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
*From: *Richard C Evans
*Sent: *Saturday, 20 June 2015 18:06
*To: *MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
*Reply To: *evan...@mac.com
*Subject: *Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third
Man (1949)
The unfavourable scenario (presumably no one
To: evan...@mac.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man
(1949)
The unfavourable scenario (presumably no one is thinking fake), is that
it could be an International RR?
(Prior to that horrible RR which is based on it. I think based on the
actual printed
Evans
*Sent: *Saturday, 20 June 2015 18:06
*To: *MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
*Reply To: *evan...@mac.com mailto:evan...@mac.com
*Subject: *Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The
Third Man (1949)
The unfavourable scenario (presumably no one
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:38:07 +1000
From: da...@bidll.com mailto:da...@bidll.com
Subject: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third
Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
mailto:MoPo
Thanks Paul
Some incredibly valuable insight I appreciate you sharing, I've learned
something. So, essentially the dig is on to find out about Lion
International.
Hopefully Richard Evans can share more, unless the send button on his
phone get in the way again. ;)
cheers
David
...@bidll.com
Subject: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third
Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
An exciting find has just been listed on BIDLL by a known New
Zealand based collector.
For overseas buyers please note - the currency is in NZ$ -
that's almost chicken feed
ago, they listed it as an early 1950's re-release and it sold for $900.
Todd Feiertag
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:38:07 +1000
From: da...@bidll.com
Subject: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949
2015 09:38:07 +1000
From: da...@bidll.com
Subject: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
An exciting find has just been listed on BIDLL by a known New
Zealand based collector.
For overseas buyers please
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:38:07 +1000
From: da...@bidll.com mailto:da...@bidll.com
Subject: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man
(1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
An exciting find has
years ago,
they listed it as an early 1950's re-release and it sold for $900.
Todd Feiertag
--
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:38:07 +1000
From: da...@bidll.com
Subject: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man (1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man
(1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Looks nothing like the 50s re-release here:
http://movieposters.ha.com/itm/film-noir/the-third-man-selznick-r-1950s-british-one-sheet-27-x-40-/a/693-64326.s
Looks like
Hi David,
This actually popped up in a previous thread several years ago:
_http://www.mail-archive.com/mopo-l%40listserv.american.edu/msg29685.html_
(http://www.mail-archive.com/mopo-l@listserv.american.edu/msg29685.html)
Like Rich Evans said, on face value the version with the A rating –
for $900.
Todd Feiertag
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:38:07 +1000
From: da...@bidll.com
Subject: [MOPO] [FA] ULTRA Rare English One Sheet - The Third Man
(1949)
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
An exciting find has just been listed on BIDLL by a known New
Zealand based collector.
For overseas
An exciting find has just been listed on BIDLL by a known New Zealand
based collector.
For overseas buyers please note - *_the currency is in NZ$_* - that's
almost chicken feed in most other countries!
Good luck to the all bidders! Or buy now and save yourself the stress!
92 matches
Mail list logo
