* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-03 21:03:16 +0200]:
> * Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-03 15:43]:
> > set status_format="Hello, I am mutt and my PID is `echo $PPID`"
> > and variations on that theme?
>
> have you tried that? i dont think so. ;-)
Then you think wrong. I d
Hi. I'm getting a bounce from a client who is using mac outlook
exchange. My mail is not showing up properly.
> This message uses a character set that is not supported by the
> Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the
> attached message. If the text doesn't display corre
> Hi !
> Is it possible to read Mailinglist of public folders on a
> Exchange Server with Mutt
>
> __
> Nik Engel NETWAYS GmbH
> Senior Systems Engineer Deutschherrnstr. 47a
> Fon.0911/92885-13 D-9042
* Heiko Heil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 06:55]:
> > > hh@server:~ > locale
> > > LANG=de_DE
> > > [snipped]
> > I read this to be the locale of your server.
> > I guess the locale of your laptop looks like LANG=de_DE@euro.
> Right.
> > 2 reasons I can think of:
> > 1. check /usr/lib/locale di
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 11:47:51AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> > Err... why are you using Mutt? Why not just set up an NFS share or FTP
> > access, and just *copy* the files from one server to the other?
>
> You answered this yourself
Reason is that the destination server doesn't store IM
Hi !
Is it possible to read Mailinglist of public folders on a Exchange Server with Mutt
__
Nik Engel NETWAYS GmbH
Senior Systems Engineer Deutschherrnstr. 47a
Fon.0911/92885-13 D-90429 Nürnberg
Fax.09
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 03:42]:
> #!/bin/bash
> for i in ~/mail/*
> do
> i=$(basename $i)
> echo folder-hook =$i \"set record=\'=$i\'\"
> done
>
> then simply source the output of this script.
> It might even be simpler than that, though ;)
exactly - "basename" is not
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:00:50PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % Is there a way to tell mutt to either:
> % a) use my IMAP subscriptions as my 'mailboxes' (to check for new mail)
> % b) tell mutt to consider all mailboxes as 'mailboxes'
> No, not really.
:-(
> % I don't like having to list all o
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:46:20PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> $ LANG=de_DE
> $ export LANG
> $ mutt -F /dev/null -f /dev/null
>
> mutt gives me this mini-help now:
> q:Ende d:Lösch. u:Behalten s:Speichern m:Senden r:Antw. g:Antw.alle ?:Hil
>
> Does it work for you now, too?
No :-(
* Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 07:21]:
> As to my experience (with procmail filtering), it is unreliable to
> expect that the send-msg-to-list address appears in To: or Cc:.
so this list distributes messages when the list is in the BCC header?
well, blame the list admin then!
[Heiko Heil is having problems with mutt speaking English even
though Heiko's locale is German.]
Just a thought: You do use the same (type of) shell on both
machines, right? If not, check that you are using the correct
terminology for the environment variables.
hth
--
Martin | PGP/GPG: | Ther
Ricardo --
...and then Ricardo SIGNES said...
%
% On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:00:50PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
...
% > % I don't like having to list all of my 50+ folders, to which procmail writes,
% > % just to have it tell me if there's new mail in them.
% > So whip up a little script that goes
Rory --
...and then Rory Campbell-Lange said...
%
% Hi. I'm getting a bounce from a client who is using mac outlook
% exchange. My mail is not showing up properly.
Yeah, but we need more details.
%
% > This message uses a character set that is not supported by the
% > Internet Service. To v
first thought: why does anyone send
problems with Outlook to this list?
* Rory Campbell-Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 09:09]:
> I'm getting a bounce from a client who is using mac
> outlook exchange. My mail is not showing up properly.
> > This message uses a character set that is
> > not
begin quoting what Sven Guckes said on Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:39:43AM +0200:
>
> feature request denied.
>
> macro index c !
That breaks "? for list" functionality. It would be better to assign
it to another key:
macro index I "!\r"
Then get used to using "I" when you want it.
msg266
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 02:46:23PM +0200, Martin Karlsson wrote:
> [Heiko Heil is having problems with mutt speaking English even
> though Heiko's locale is German.]
> Just a thought: You do use the same (type of) shell on both
> machines, right? If not, check that you are using the correct
> term
* Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-04-02 08:22]:
> begin quoting what Sven Guckes said on Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:39:43AM +0200:
> >
> > feature request denied.
> >
> > macro index c !
>
> That breaks "? for list" functionality. It would be better to assign
> it to another key:
>
> ma
* Heiko Heil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 15:24:07 +0200]:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 02:46:23PM +0200, Martin Karlsson wrote:
> > [Heiko Heil is having problems with mutt speaking English even
> > though Heiko's locale is German.]
> > Just a thought: You do use the same (type of) shell on both
* Heiko Heil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 11:54]:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:46:20PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > $ LANG=de_DE
> > $ export LANG
> > $ mutt -F /dev/null -f /dev/null
> >
> > mutt gives me this mini-help now:
> > q:Ende d:Lösch. u:Behalten s:Speichern...
> > Does it
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 04:04:21PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> Are the variables "export"ed?
> Start a new bash, and check if the variables are still there.
Yes, they are exported.
Other programms like gnupg are running in German language whithout
persuasion.
--
Cheers,
Heiko Heil
* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 14:04]:
> > > [Heiko Heil is having problems with mutt speaking
> > > English even though Heiko's locale is German.]
> > > Just a thought: You do use the same (type of) shell on both
> > > machines, right? If not, check that you are using the cor
Thanks for all your help.
I've got the answer - 'unset meta_key'.
Setting meta_key will strip the 8th bit of any 8bit key value, which is
both the key value of alt-key and mbyte characters.
best regards,
charlie
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:49:45PM +0800, ¬ö¬K¿³/Charles Jie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ca
* Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 08:56]:
> * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-03 21:03:16 +0200]:
> > * Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-03 15:43]:
> > > set status_format="Hello, I am mutt and my PID is `echo $PPID`"
> > > and variations on that theme?
> > have you
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 04:19:54PM +0200,
German Kraut Sven Guckes wrote:
> [...]
> come on - give more info!
> how did you install mutt - from source? deb? rpm?
^^^
> where does the binary get its locales?
>
> $ mutt -v | grep PKG
> PKGDATADIR="/home/gu
* Heiko Heil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 14:56]:
> German Kraut Sven Guckes wrote:
> > come on - give more info!
> > how did you install mutt - from source? deb? rpm?
> ^^^
> > where does the binary get its locales?
> > $ mutt -v | grep PKG
> > PKGDAT
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-03 22:46]:
> > > can mutt display its own process id?
> > * Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-03 15:43]:
> > > set status_format="Hello, I am mutt and my PID is `echo $PPID`"
> > > and variations on that theme?
> > have you tried that? i do
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 05:30:35PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> and next thing you know it'll be
> "handbuch handbuch" instead of "man man".
> no thanks.
shouldn't that be "hand hand"? (man is a shortcut for manual)
...i'm not really that funny but i try...
> (you English-only types are not su
i think i know the answer to this but i wanted to make sure...
if i have a send-hook:
send-hook somelist set pgp_autosign=no
it changes the value of pgp_autosign from there on out, yes? it is not
a temporary item just for this send afterwhich the global value of
pgp_autosign returns. that is
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 08:51:31AM -0700, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> i think i know the answer to this but i wanted to make sure...
>
> if i have a send-hook:
>
> send-hook somelist set pgp_autosign=no
>
> it changes the value of pgp_autosign from there on out, yes? it is not
> a temporary it
* Peter T. Abplanalp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 10:51]:
> i think i know the answer to this but i wanted to make sure...
>
> if i have a send-hook:
>
> send-hook somelist set pgp_autosign=no
>
> it changes the value of pgp_autosign from there on out, yes? it is
> not a temporary item just
Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> i think i know the answer to this but i wanted to make sure...
>
> if i have a send-hook:
>
> send-hook somelist set pgp_autosign=no
>
> it changes the value of pgp_autosign from there on out, yes? it is not
> a temporary item just for this send afterwhich the glob
On Thu, 04 Apr 2002, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> believe it or not some of us english (and americans too!)
> can muddle through another language too.
>
> > Sven [German Kraut]
>
> -peter [american swiss]
http://babelfish.altavista.com :)
-Tim [human equivalent of american curbside terrier]
Peter --
...and then Peter T. Abplanalp said...
%
% i think i know the answer to this but i wanted to make sure...
Hey, you have the manual; what more do you need? ;-)
%
% if i have a send-hook:
%
% send-hook somelist set pgp_autosign=no
%
% it changes the value of pgp_autosign from there
Sven --
...and then Sven Guckes said...
%
...
% system which uses *the* Bounce Shell?
Hey, where do I get this shell? Is it for use only on mail servers which
refuse mail, or on any mail server to be called when you want to refuse
a single piece of mail? How does it's scripting language look?
hh@server:~>export LANG=kraut
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 05:30:35PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> what about /usr/share/locale then?
ls: /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/mutt.mo: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
> check the logs then. did you install with "--disable-nls"?
No, I didn't.
> an
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 07:57:51AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Ricardo SIGNES said...
> % My procmail rules use regexes to generate folder names on the fly!
>
> Hmmm... So have procmail generate the folder name and then hand it off
> to a script which checks a list to see if it's known
* On 2002.04.03, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Simon White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 03-Apr-02 at 16:47, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > but maybe it's just that our Solaris machines
> > don't have proper locales installed. actually,
> > the local installation drives me up the
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 16:34:49 +0200]:
> I suppose you are using a non-bourne shell as EXECSHELL, are you? it might
> be /bin/sh on your system - but it is probably linked to bash?
Yes, I'm using bash.
> so my question is - have you tried accessing PPID with /bin/sh on a
Hi,
* David T-G [04/04/02 18:48:49] wrote:
> More importantly, multiple send-hooks can be applied to a single message,
> so mutt goes through them all applying everything that matches. If you
> had
> send-hook . set pgp_autosign=yes
> send-hook aol.com set pgp_autosign=no
> send-hook dad
Hi,
* Heiko Heil [04/04/02 19:00:52] wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 05:30:35PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > and next thing you know it'll be "handbuch handbuch" instead of "man
> > man". no thanks.
Hey, sometimes it would be really funny! Think of this one:
'katze < mahlzeit > katzeklo'
;-)
Rocco, et al --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hi!
%
% * David T-G [04/04/02 18:48:49] wrote:
...
% > Contrast this to an fcc-hook or a folder-hook, only one of which can be
% > applied; mutt goes through the list and stops at the first match, so your
% > default case -- if you even
I'm on a mailing list with an email address of A. The same mailing list
also works with an alternate email address of B. Both addresses are
listed in the "lists" command. And doing 'L' (list-reply) generates the
appropriate "To: " or "To: " headers.
I'd like to change this slightly. On messag
Eugene Lee wrote:
> I'd like to change this slightly. On messages sent to the mailing list
> via the alternate address B, I want 'L' to generate the headers using
> the main address A, i.e. "To: ". Messages sent to the main address A
> are fine and can be left alone. I'm guessing a send-hook wi
Hi all
I have just got GNUPG working with Mutt, and since I am still new to
Mutt and PGP I am very impressed.
However by default (my choice), I now sign all outgoing emails
(including this one I hope), I have increased the timeout threshold of
mutt remembering my secret key password so that it d
Me again! :)
Sorry if my previous email appeared as a thread to another message,
there is a reason though, which is why I have this question.
In Mutt, quite often I want to send an email to someone, but I want to
be able to highlight an email from them, and click "Send it to this
person, but it
ok, i've spent a number of hours over the last two days going over the
list archives for mutt and gnupg reading up on the conventions for
signing messages. it is now my understanding that there are 3 ways to
sign a message: pgp/mime, ascii armor, and application/pgp. i'm not
certain on the termi
Hi,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04/04/02 23:04:41] wrote:
> I have just got GNUPG working with Mutt, and since I am still new to
> Mutt and PGP I am very impressed.
Fine.
> However by default (my choice), I now sign all outgoing emails
> (including this one I hope), I have increased the timeout thresh
Hi,
* David T-G [04/04/02 21:59:38] wrote:
> Rocco, et al --
> ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
> % * David T-G [04/04/02 18:48:49] wrote:
> % > Contrast this to an fcc-hook or a folder-hook, only one of which can be
> % > applied; mutt goes through the list and stops at the first match, so your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
>
> given the above, i know mutt handles pgp/mime natively and that it can
> do application/pgp with the pgp_create_traditional. my problem is
> that neither of these formats appears to work if the recipient is
> using outl
Hi,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04/04/02 23:08:19] wrote:
> In Mutt, quite often I want to send an email to someone, but I want to
> be able to highlight an email from them, and click "Send it to this
> person, but it isn't a reply" - if that makes sense.
I try to repeat what you want to make sure I th
Dean --
First, I must note that you shouldn't just reply to any old message and
start a new thread. This has nothing to do with hooks or even any prior
musings.
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% Hi all
Hello!
%
% I have just got GNUPG working with Mutt, and since I am still new to
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:50:25PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> >
> > given the above, i know mutt handles pgp/mime natively and that it can
> > do application/pgp with the pgp_create_traditional. my problem is
> > that neither of these formats appears to work if the
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
[talking about PGP passwords and such]
%
% I type it every time because it's a security feature and I try to store
% passwords in my mind only. I do not even want to store it somewhere in
% memory and/or swap.
Good idea on how to store; better safe th
On Thu 04-Apr-2002 at 02:34:50PM -0700, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
>
> it is now my understanding that there are 3 ways to sign a message:
> pgp/mime, ascii armor, and application/pgp. i'm not certain on the
> terminology for the last two or even that there is a difference
> between them. might
Where can I get that pgp_outlook_compat patch? mutt.org has a link to
ftp.cm.nu, but I can't access it. Is there somewhere else I can get it?
-R
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:50:25PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> >
> > given the above, i know mutt handles pgp/mim
Dean --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% Me again! :)
Welcome back! Returning to the trough? :-)
%
% Sorry if my previous email appeared as a thread to another message,
% there is a reason though, which is why I have this question.
Funny you should mention that...
%
% In Mutt,
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:00:40PM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
:
: Eugene Lee wrote:
: >
: > I'd like to change this slightly. On messages sent to the mailing list
: > via the alternate address B, I want 'L' to generate the headers using
: > the main address A, i.e. "To: ". Messages sent to t
Peter --
...and then Peter T. Abplanalp said...
%
% On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:50:25PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
% > Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
...
% > > that neither of these formats appears to work if the recipient is
% > > using outlook. btw - the outlook is set up to use the g-data
...
% >
Robert --
...and then Robert Conde said...
%
% Where can I get that pgp_outlook_compat patch? mutt.org has a link to
% ftp.cm.nu, but I can't access it. Is there somewhere else I can get it?
See my reply, in this thread, to Peter and then surf over to
http://mutt.justpickone.org/
and
Eugene --
...and then Eugene Lee said...
%
% On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:00:40PM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
% :
% : Eugene Lee wrote:
% : >
...
% : > are fine and can be left alone. I'm guessing a send-hook will work, but
% : > I haven't been able to divinate the right combination.
% :
% :
David T-G wrote:
>
> ... that's my understanding as well. $p_c_t will only work if you have
> no attachments and use us-ascii characters, or at least that's the way
> it's been through 1.3.x so far.
yup - for attachments you'd need to use s/mime or PGP/MIME.
traditionally signed messages are us
Hi,
* David T-G [04/05/02 00:06:31] wrote:
> ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
> %
> [talking about PGP passwords and such]
> FWIW, if gpg is installed on your machine with the proper root permissions
> then it can keep the passphrase from being swapped out to disk, which
> means that you need onl
I know most of these things were already said, but some of it's speculation
and the complete answers may not be clear, so a bit of clarification:
On Apr 04, Bruno Postle [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Thu 04-Apr-2002 at 02:34:50PM -0700, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> > it is now my understanding t
Hi Dean,
> [...] then
> pressing "r" which adds in the in-reply-to line in the header. I then
> manually "E"dit the email headers and remove the reference to the reply.
> There must be an easier way - anyone? :)
If $edit_headers is set, you just have to remove the In-Reply-To line
when editing
> % Me again! :)
> Welcome back! Returning to the trough? :-)
Heh - I must be mad huh! ;)
> Yes, there is; use your aliases file or an external query to something
> like lbdb or abook or ...
Yep, I have just looked into and sucessfully installed lbdb, it was just
what I was looking for. Howev
On Apr 04, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> ...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
> % writing to, but my emails usually start by going into the folder for the
> % person that I am writing to and clicking an old email from them, then
> % pressing "r" which adds in the in-reply-to line in the
On 04/04/02, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> first thought: why does anyone send problems with Outlook to this
> list?
Well I've never had a bounce like this before. But I suppose it is
really a plea for enlightenment about character sets and encodings.
>
> * Rory Campbell-Lange <[EMAIL
On 04/04/02, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> % > This message uses a character set that is not supported by the
> % > Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the
> % > attached message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the
> % > attachment to disk, and then
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 21:08]:
> In Mutt, quite often I want to send an email to someone, but I want
> to be able to highlight an email from them, and click "Send it
> to this person, but it isn't a reply" - if that makes sense.
>
> I am just lazy for not wanting to h
> i once suggested a command which does just that -
> send a new mail to the sender of the current mail.
> but it was turned down. (noone needs this etc).
Damn, this seems like just the option I was wanting really. Its a shame
that it doesn't exist. A sort of "send new mail to recipient" featu
Hi,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04/05/02 01:50:49] wrote:
> Yep, I have just looked into and sucessfully installed lbdb, it was just
> what I was looking for. However I have to pass a query string to lbdb,
> so I am just working out how to display all entries in the system.
Maybe via "display_filter"
* On 2002.04.04, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In Mutt, quite often I want to send an email to someone, but I want
> > to be able to highlight an email from them, and click "Send it
> > to this person, but it isn't a reply" - if that makes sense.
>
>
* On 2002.03.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Rocco Rutte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> something like 'hostname | cut ...' to get the short name. If I - on
> Solaris - run 'hostname -s' it tells me: 'uname: not super user'. So I
> use a switch in my .profile to find wether this is Solaris
begin quoting what [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 10:04:41PM +0100:
>
> But I was wondering how other people do this and sign all outgoinging
> emails. Do you just accept that you need to enter your password every
> so often, and "thats life" so to speak?
Yes.
If it bothers yo
...David T-G made some exceleent suggestions...
ok, i got mutt 1.3.28, put dale's patch over it, compiled and
installed it. now my outlook can read the stuff. thanks!
however, if i am working without any attachments everything works fine
but as soon as i add an attachemnt, i no longer get the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there anything wrong with hitting F in the compose menu and filtering
the message through the "gpg --clearsign" command?
- -R
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:50:25PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
* On 2002.04.03, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> let's see what the configure script says:
>
> guckes@ritz:~/install/mutt-1.3.28> ./configure --help|grep icon
> --with-libiconv-prefix=DIR search for libiconv in DIR/include and DIR/lib
>
> so t
begin quoting what Peter T. Abplanalp said on Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:06:14PM -0700:
>
> a mime anyway so why not just add a pgp/mime part? is it even
> possible to send an application/pgp message with an attachment?
No. That's one reason inline signatures are evil.
msg26729/pgp0.pgp
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 05:22:51PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
:
: Were I you I'd have procmail recognize messages to/from B and rewrite it
: as to/from A so that mutt just knows about A.
Yup, that's easy enough for a single email address. But I've not
figured out how to do so while preserving mult
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 08:26:49PM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote:
>
> No. That's one reason inline signatures are evil.
>
i kind of figured; however, the gnupg plugin for outlook from g-data
handles it by inline signing the message and then signing the
attachment separately. it handles encryption
begin quoting what Peter T. Abplanalp said on Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:49:15PM -0700:
> that this would be considered "broken" by today's "standards." i
> guess if i want mutt to handle things the same way for those of my
> recipients who have to use outlook, i'm going to have to "fix" mutt or
>
David Champion wrote:
>
> It says "uname: not super user" because uname(2) is the syscall that
> sets the hostname.
>
> Just use uname -n on all operating systems, and don't trouble yourself
> with the switch. "uname -n" returns the nodename. The nodename is the
> "real" hostname, and has nothin
Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> i kind of figured; however, the gnupg plugin for outlook from g-data
> handles it by inline signing the message and then signing the
> attachment separately. it handles encryption the same way. i guess
> that this would be considered "broken" by today's "standards."
* On 2002.04.04, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> also, the fact that the 'hostname' command in FreeBSD has a '-s' switch
> (which trims off any domain information) seems to indicate that at least
> some people set it this way; uname -n seems to report
* On 2002.04.02, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Mark J. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 11:27:31PM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> > /usr/xpg4/bin/id -u
> To expand upon this:
>
> When SunOS becamse Solaris, its base moved from BSD (Berkeley's
> UNIX-based OS) to System
Eugene --
...and then Eugene Lee said...
%
% On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 05:22:51PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% :
% : Were I you I'd have procmail recognize messages to/from B and rewrite it
% : as to/from A so that mutt just knows about A.
%
% Yup, that's easy enough for a single email address. Bu
Jeremy, et al --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
%
% I know most of these things were already said, but some of it's speculation
% and the complete answers may not be clear, so a bit of clarification:
Thanks; that's always helpful!
%
...
%
% Both of these ("ascii-pgp" and S/MIME) are pre
Rory, et al --
...and then Rory Campbell-Lange said...
%
% On 04/04/02, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
% > % > This message uses a character set that is not supported by the
...
% > So it sounds like you have a MIME attachment that the Mac client can't
% > read. What is the format of your
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 08:54:26PM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> begin quoting what Peter T. Abplanalp said on Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:49:15PM -0700:
> > that this would be considered "broken" by today's "standards." i
> > guess if i want mutt to handle things the same way for those of my
> > re
Hi,
I've been using mutt for some time (I'm no expert, though) and I love it.
However, I've run into a recent problem which I need a solution for. I often
compose mail when I'm away from home via an ssh session into my home LAN which
has a dummy domain name for internal DHCP purposes.
The pr
> > As to my experience (with procmail filtering), it is unreliable to
> > expect that the send-msg-to-list address appears in To: or Cc:.
>
> so this list distributes messages when the list is in the BCC header?
> well, blame the list admin then!
Yes, and I won't waste time on politics, which i
EC wrote:
> The problem is that when I use mutt, the Return-Path header is sent with my
> dummy domain name, which causes certain (not all) SMTP servers to not deliver
> my message since the domain is unresolvable. When I use other mail clients
> (Pine, Eudora, Mail in MacOSX), the header is sen
--- Alexander Wasmuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any way I can get Mutt to send the desired "Return-Path" header?
>
> | 6.3.43. envelope_from
> |
> | Type: boolean
> | Default: no
>
> so "set envelop_from=yes" should do that, IIRC.
That did it! Thanks! :)
--ec
93 matches
Mail list logo
