Hello,
Iam a OpenBSD user. I would like to know if there is any technique
specific to the US to be able to benchmark the IO for this OS. Also,
what result would be considered acceptable and what is not.
Thanks!!
Andres
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com
You may try DBT2 (TPC-C like) workload.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Sachin Gaikwad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello Sachin
>>
>> have you looked at using Benchmark Suite?
>>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Sachin
>
> have you looked at using Benchmark Suite?
> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/mysql-benchmarks.html
Yes, I am looking at it now.
But still I need TPC benchmark which is standard in
Hi all
Is there a MySQL TPC benchmark available to download ? If someone is
aware of such a thing, let me know.
Thanks,
Sachin
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 09/23/2008 02:42 PM, Ben A.H. wrote:
I figured that was what you meant... I guess my table didn't work (see above
message...don't ya' love plaintext :-O)...
Has anyone ever tried to benchmark the difference between utilizing ENUMs
vs. traditional relational databasing? I w
I figured that was what you meant... I guess my table didn't work (see above
message...don't ya' love plaintext :-O)...
Has anyone ever tried to benchmark the difference between utilizing ENUMs
vs. traditional relational databasing? I would think ENUM is ideal for items
I s
Dear List,
I am after a tool which benchmarks a file system in the same way that a
MySql InnoDB system is likely to access it.
That is, small random reads and writes in a very large file.
For instance, the tool 'bonnie++' is no good for this as is concentrates
too much on sequential read and
I have a server that has several hundred table in a few different databases
comprising almost a gig of data, all running on a rather old (3.23) version
of mysql. I have used the slow query log to identify queries and have
optimized the queries significantly. At this point the entries in the
slow-q
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> On 12/19/06, David Sparks wrote:
>> I noticed an interesting benchmark at tweakers.net that shows mysql not
>> scaling very well on hyperthreading and multicore cpus (see links at end
>> of email).
>>
>> Does anyone know what engi
On 12/19/06, David Sparks wrote:
I noticed an interesting benchmark at tweakers.net that shows mysql not
scaling very well on hyperthreading and multicore cpus (see links at end
of email).
Does anyone know what engine they are using for their tests? (Innodb,
myisam, berkdb heheh)
InnoDB, the
I noticed an interesting benchmark at tweakers.net that shows mysql not
scaling very well on hyperthreading and multicore cpus (see links at end
of email).
Does anyone know what engine they are using for their tests? (Innodb,
myisam, berkdb heheh)
In fact they seem to show that postgres is a
Hello.
In your query BENCHMARK() doesn't execute the query, it is
passed just like a string to the second argument of the BENCHMARK().
Raimundo Sierra wrote:
> It is not clear to me what benchmark really does. Example:
>
> SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE * FROM mytable where myV
ssage-
From: Raimundo Sierra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:37 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Benchmark()
It is not clear to me what benchmark really does. Example:
SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE * FROM mytable where myVarcharRow like 'sometext%'
It is not clear to me what benchmark really does. Example:
SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE * FROM mytable where myVarcharRow like 'sometext%'
or otherVarcharRow like 'someothertext';
takes approx. 0.3 seconds. If you benchmark this query, which to my
understanding should run and not
Hello.
See:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/mysql-benchmarks.html
OKAN ARI wrote:
> How can I test the performans benchmark of my MYSQL?
> For instance how can I learn query per second information? And any other
> informatioin?
>
> Thanks
>
>
--
How can I test the performans benchmark of my MYSQL?
For instance how can I learn query per second information? And any other
informatioin?
Thanks
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello.
Usually only benchmarks will show a real picture
for you. Create foreign keys, perform some tests. Then
temporary disable FKs using SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=0 and
repeat the performance measurement. Super Smack is a good
tool for such kind of analysis. See:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/
Here's some thing I've been thinking about.
I want to use INNODB without FKs. I don't need or want referential integrity
in my app (due to a schema and performance issue).
Basically I just create FKs in my OR layer and my app enforces the rules.
The column is still an _ID column so I visually k
Folks,
> FreeBSD 5.x does a lot of things really well, and it can be very
> fast too, but there's no stable release of 5.x yet, and the 5.x
> code is clearly hampered speedwise by the presence of loads of
> debugging code. From the 5.x documentation:
>
> ---
> NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD
#x27;t yet feel comfortable with using on production
> > machines. Only one of those issues is with benchmark numbers, but that
> > is certainly one of them.
>
> If you don't feel comfortable with 5_branch on production, that's fine, I
> respect your choice.
At 05:12 PM 5/29/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Now the fun part becomes which linux distro do you use? Which is faster?
Because trust me, each distro will benchmark differently.
Let the games begin!
Donny
I've seen benchmarks from people who did different linux distros, and they
were all pretty
Now the fun part becomes which linux distro do you use? Which is faster?
Because trust me, each distro will benchmark differently.
Let the games begin!
Donny
> -Original Message-
> From: JG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 4:34 PM
> To: [EMA
ng on production
machines. Only one of those issues is with benchmark numbers, but that is
certainly one of them.
Thank you,
Eric
I'll try FreeBSD 4.x later (with LinuxThreads) but I don't see how it will
do much better.
- Jeremy
I tried 4.10 FreeBSD with LinuxThreads using default mysq
those issues is with benchmark numbers, but that is
certainly one of them.
Thank you,
Eric
Eric,
The FreeBSD dev team sure isn't saying this.
We have/had lengthy threads going in FreeBSD-threads and other mailing
lists regarding this problem, nobody brought up running 4.x there.
The FreeBS
Err... I guess I owe Jeremy Zawodny an apology for mistyping his name. I
promise next time I won't type without reading.
His site is at http://jeremy.zawodny.com/. And I really recommend his
book "High Performance MySQL".
Sorry for the typo, Zawodny!
RV Tec
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For li
Eric,
> I am sure all FreeBSD users are sick and tired of saying this. USE
> 4.10
> Lots of people blindly follow version numbers but 5.x is a lot different
> than 4.x in ways I don't yet feel comfortable with using on production
> machines. Only one of those issu
Hi,
I am sure all FreeBSD users are sick and tired of saying this. USE 4.10
Lots of people blindly follow version numbers but 5.x is a lot different than 4.x in
ways I don't yet feel comfortable with using on production machines. Only one of those
issues is with benchmark numbers, but
JG,
> I am a FreeBSD user, but after having run benchmarks for
> the past 2 weeks, I think you'll be surprised when you see
> the results from Linux.
>
> Linux will outperform *BSD by nearly double when it comes to
> MySQL.
That's what I expect and hope for. Although, I thought that FreeBSD
wou
Facing this new scenario, I am going to give Linux a shot --
definitively, this one is going to outperform OpenBSD. Using the same
hardware, and the same options (as possible).
Does anyone have a hint for this?
Again, thanks a lot!
Best regards,
RV Tec
I am a FreeBSD user, but after
Folks,
Following some advices, I have decided to give FreeBSD a shot. So, I got
one test machine (P4 2.0GHz, 512MB), installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 on one
disk, and OpenBSD 3.5 on the other (both 40GB 7200RPM IDE disks) -- so I
could compare the results.
MySQL (4.0.20) is compiled from source, u
Carlos,
- Original Message -
From: ""Carlos Proal"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:09 AM
Subject: Innodb multiple tablespaces benchmark
>
>
> Hi all, specially to Heikki.
>
> Its rea
Hi all, specially to Heikki.
Its really amazing that multiple tablespaces are available before 2004,
congratulations to Innodb Oy Inc.
Right now im migrating from 4.1.0 to 4.1.1 but im figuring out if there is a
downgrade in performance in order to use multiple tablespaces, obviously it
must
Hello,
I'm in the midst of using mySQL for some genetic information
searching based upon the GenBank data from the NCBI, National Center
for Biotechnology Information. In doing some testing on using mySQL,
and began to wonder if this data set would be of interest as a benchmark
fo
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 09:05 AM, David Steinbrunner wrote:
The Mac was HFS+ journaled. Disk: the stock Apple-supplied one. The
Linux machine was a default SuSE 8.0 installation. ext2 as the
filesystem? No idea about journaling. No SCSI or RAID, just an
internal IDE disk. Both machines a
The Mac was HFS+ journaled. Disk: the stock Apple-supplied one. The
Linux machine was a default SuSE 8.0 installation. ext2 as the
filesystem? No idea about journaling. No SCSI or RAID, just an
internal IDE disk. Both machines are really consumer-level machines,
no heavy-duty server hardware. That
usr 0.00 sys + 0.00
> cusr 0.00 csys = 881.86 CPU)
>
> Does that mean anything in this regard?
Run the benchmark again. Notice if the CPU is consistently around
100% or not. If not, it's disk bound. Otherwise, it's CPU bound.
> >What are the filesystems like on each
I just installed Panther on my G5 at home. Unfortunately, for some
reason I can't get the Perl module DBD::mysql to install (using
CPAN, had no problems doing this in Jaguar) so I can't run the
benchmark suite for now.
JP
I had similar issues, but I was also using a custom buil
Jeremy D. Zawodny:
> I was wondering if there is something I can do, configuration-wise, to
do something about those very slow 'inserts' (and 'updates') on the Mac?
Thanks in advance for any insight,
Did it appear to be disk or CPU bound?
Sorry, newbie here. I don't know how I can tell. The RU
;t get the Perl module DBD::mysql to install (using CPAN,
had no problems doing this in Jaguar) so I can't run the benchmark
suite for now.
JP
I had similar issues, but I was also using a custom build of MySQL,
which was not in a standard location.
Try this:
perl Makefile.PL --cflags=-I/p
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:19:59AM -0700, Van wrote:
>
> Jeremy:
>
> I believe that's what I was attempting to convey. My suggestion was that the
> G4 should not be disk bound (limited by disk bandwidth). The CPU on my DEC
> Alpha is a meagerly 300, but the disk can stream faster than my PIII t
Jeremy:
I believe that's what I was attempting to convey. My suggestion was that the
G4 should not be disk bound (limited by disk bandwidth). The CPU on my DEC
Alpha is a meagerly 300, but the disk can stream faster than my PIII true Intel
733MHz. That's why I suggested he look at the disk / c
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:56:22AM -0700, Van wrote:
>
> I can't imagine a G4 would be disk bound relative to an Intel machine, unless
> there is something very wrong with the disk or controller. Also, you might want
> to defrag your disk on the Mac.
>
> G4s have much more disk bandwidth than an
te:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 07:57:00PM +0100, Jan Pieter Kunst wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I recently ran the MySQL benchmark suite on a Dual 1 GHz G4 running Mac
> > OS X Server 10.2.8, and an 800 MHz Intel machine running SuSE Linux 8.0.
> > Both instal
s doing this in Jaguar) so I can't run the benchmark
suite for now.
JP
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 07:57:00PM +0100, Jan Pieter Kunst wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I recently ran the MySQL benchmark suite on a Dual 1 GHz G4 running Mac
> OS X Server 10.2.8, and an 800 MHz Intel machine running SuSE Linux 8.0.
> Both installations used the same my.cnf file.
&
roughput you would get in OS9.
I'd be curious what kind of numbers Panther shows. Once I get my
xServe setup, just arrived, I'll try running some tests myself.
On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 01:57 PM, Jan Pieter Kunst wrote:
Hi everyone,
I recently ran the MySQL benchmark suite o
ve
setup, just arrived, I'll try running some tests myself.
On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 01:57 PM, Jan Pieter Kunst wrote:
Hi everyone,
I recently ran the MySQL benchmark suite on a Dual 1 GHz G4 running Mac
OS X Server 10.2.8, and an 800 MHz Intel machine running SuSE Linux
8.0.
Bot
I'm not entirely sure what to do about the slow insert results, they
are the slowest part no matter how you configure it, it seems. I've
attached some benchmark results I ran on a dual 2GHz G5 for comparison.
Both MyISAM and InnoDB.
Here are the insert results though:
MyISAM:
ins
Hi everyone,
I recently ran the MySQL benchmark suite on a Dual 1 GHz G4 running Mac
OS X Server 10.2.8, and an 800 MHz Intel machine running SuSE Linux 8.0.
Both installations used the same my.cnf file.
The results are comparable in all benchmarks except one: the 'insert'.
In that on
Hi!
Mark Matthews, the author of Connector/J commented on the speed improvements
of JDBC since the eWeek benchmark.
Best regards,
Heikki
- Alkuperäinen viesti -
Lähettäjä: "Mark Matthews"
Vastaanottaja: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lähetetty: Thursday
Chris,
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Nolan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:43 PM
Subject: That eWeek benchmark...
> Hi all,
>
> Looking back over the eWeek benchmark that's linked to from ww
Hi all,
Looking back over the eWeek benchmark that's linked to from www.innodb.com
(where MySQL is a match for Oracle), I made a few observations.
Firstly, both MySQL and Oracle achieved basically identical performance
levels. This puzzles me as many tests I have seen online show MySQL to
and they usually login to the system at the
begining of the the day and remain connected untill they knock of. I
have setup two test machines, one with Pg and the other with Mysql. Both
machine have the same data (sample).
I am looking for a benchmark utilty that the simulate a user session.
For
Does anyone know how or better still can point me in the right direction on testing a
newly install MySQL application server. We would like to run some tests to see what
needs tweaking if any.
Thanks
Jon L. Miller, MCNE, CNS
Director/Sr Systems Consultant
MMT Networks Pty Ltd
http://www.mmtnet
In the last episode (Jul 29), Asif Iqbal said:
> On my E420R with 4 x 450MHz and 4 gb mem what mysql variables should I need to
> play with to improve the following output
>
> mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE(&
On my E420R with 4 x 450MHz and 4 gb mem what mysql variables should I need to
play with to improve the following output
mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
+------+
| BENCHMARK(100,
In the last episode (Jul 29), Asif Iqbal said:
> Now I am running these processes for my mysql serever
>
> /bin/sh /usr/local/mysql/bin/safe_mysqld --datadir=/usr/local/mysql/data
> --pid-file=/usr/local/mysql/data/webrt.pid
>
> /usr/local/mysql-standard-4.0.13-sun-solaris2.8-sparc/bin/mysqld
> -
i got 0.96 on a dual XEON 2G 1G ram , its a dell box
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:41:00AM -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>> Solaris SPARC 420R 4 * 450 MHz, 4GB - 2.93 secs ... Yikes.. Any
>> suggestion on how to improve it ?
>
> Get a faster CPU.
> --
> Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux
e windows. You got 4 CPUs, use
> them :) All that "benchmark" query does is tell you how fast one cpu
> is.
>
>
--
Asif Iqbal
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8B686E08
There's no place like 127.0.0.1
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list a
In the last episode (Jul 29), Asif Iqbal said:
> Solaris SPARC 420R 4 * 450 MHz, 4GB - 2.93 secs ... Yikes.. Any
> suggestion on how to improve it ?
Run it 4 times simultaneously in separate windows. You got 4 CPUs, use
them :) All that "benchmark" query does is tell you how
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:41:00AM -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> Solaris SPARC 420R 4 * 450 MHz, 4GB - 2.93 secs ... Yikes.. Any suggestion on
> how to improve it ?
Get a faster CPU.
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://jeremy.zawodny.c
Solaris SPARC 420R 4 * 450 MHz, 4GB - 2.93 secs ... Yikes.. Any suggestion on
how to improve it ?
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, John May wrote:
> Xserve 1ghz - 1.08 sec
>
> G3 333mhz - 2.78 sec
>
> - John
>
>
> >On my p4 2gig
> >
> >mysql> SELECT
; no less.
>
> Yes, you were beaten by a single horse CPU running on a Windoze
> machine (how are you going to live it down).
> I'm surprised no one has > 3ghz CPU's out there. I never thought my
> computer was that fast. Maybe it was the wind di
70 5168
-Original Message-
From: NTLUG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RES: What is a good benchmark?
> On my p4 2gig
>
> mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
> +
IL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RES: What is a good benchmark?
> On my p4 2gig
>
> mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
> +--
ing on Win2k no less.
Yes, you were beaten by a single horse CPU running on a Windoze machine
(how are you going to live it down).
I'm surprised no one has > 3ghz CPU's out there. I never thought my
computer was that fast. Maybe it was the wind direction?
Mike
mysql> selec
I got disappointing results compared with the ones posted here:with a
dual xeon 2Ghz, 2GB ram, freebsd 5.1, mysql
mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
+------+
| BENCHMARK(100,
>Is it me or do these dual athlons seem rather responsive!
Yay!! I win (so far... heh)!
I ran it on one of our servers (not idle... running apache w/ CGIs and db calls ~
140,000 scripts/day )
We are using as many tricks as we can.
0. mysql 4.0 binary from mysql.com
1. we set the n
I get the following on dual Athlon MP 1666MHz 1GB RAM which is 40% cpu
loaded
mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
+------+
| BENCHMARK(100,
Dual P3 933, 2 gig RAM, IDE RAID-5
+--+
| BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye")) |
+--+
|0 |
+
ql" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 6:46 PM
Subject: RE: What is a good benchmark?
> 1 row in set (0.54 sec)
>
> 2x Athlon2100
> 2GB Ram
> Linux 2.4.20
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jake Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wedn
1 row in set (0.54 sec)
2x Athlon2100
2GB Ram
Linux 2.4.20
-Original Message-
From: Jake Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Mysql
Subject: What is a good benchmark?
I ran this benchmark on my pIII 500 and was wondering what everyone else
was
personal Win98 Duron650 128MB Mysql 4.0.13 - 1.37 sec
busy server Redhat 7.0 Celeron 333 380MB Mysql 3.23.54 - 3.11 sec
> -Original Message-
> From: Jake Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 5:34 PM
> To: Mysql
> Subject: What is a
On my P3 600MHz 256MB RAM, Redhat 8:
1 row in set (2.01 sec)
>>> "Hubbard, Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/23/03 11:39AM >>>
On my 2 * 2.8Ghz 2GB RAM, Redhat 8:
mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
+-----
> On my p4 2gig
>
> mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
> +--+
> | BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye")) |
> +---
+--+
| BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye")) |
+--+
|0 |
+--+
1 row in set (1.91 sec)
PI
Hello Guys,
AlphaServer EV6 processor 500mhz/1Gm memory with Linux
mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
+------+
| BENCHMARK(100,
PROTECTED]
Assunto: RE: What is a good benchmark?
On my p4 2gig
mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
+------+
| BENCHMARK(100,
On my 1Ghz Mac PowerBook with 1GB RAM using version 4.0.13 with OS 10.2.6
mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
+------+
| BENCHMARK(100,
Xserve 1ghz - 1.08 sec
G3 333mhz - 2.78 sec
- John
On my p4 2gig
mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
+------+
| BENCHMARK(100,
On my 2 * 2.8Ghz 2GB RAM, Redhat 8:
mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
+------+
| BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye")) |
+--+
|
uli 2003 16:45
Betreff: RE: What is a good benchmark?
> On my p4 2gig
>
> mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
> +
On my 1.8GHz p4 with 512Gig of RAM I get:
mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
+------+
| BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye")) |
+--+
|
On my p4 2gig
mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
+------+
| BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye")) |
+--+
|
I ran this benchmark on my pIII 500 and was wondering what everyone else
was getting?
mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100,ENCODE("hello","goodbye"));
+------+
| BENCHMARK(100,
nt: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:54 PM
Subject: URGENT : Benchmark
> Help me ...
>
> Antonio Jose Rodrigues Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:Hi All,
>
> I almost finish my MSC Thesis and my thesis is iSCSI Performance. I would
like to make tests using Fibre Channel and iSCSI with MYS
Help me ...
Antonio Jose Rodrigues Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi All,
I almost finish my MSC Thesis and my thesis is iSCSI Performance. I would like to make
tests using Fibre Channel and iSCSI with MYSQL. Please I will need informations
(cookbook) how does implement tunning on MySQL - Linu
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 20:51, mos wrote:
> At 09:40 PM 10/2/2002, you wrote:
> >For science fair I'm doing a project on MySQL. For my introduction, I
> >need some articles, benchmarks, or anything else credible that I can put
> >in the bibliography. If anyone can help me out, I'd be extremely
> >ap
At 09:40 PM 10/2/2002, you wrote:
>For science fair I'm doing a project on MySQL. For my introduction, I
>need some articles, benchmarks, or anything else credible that I can put
>in the bibliography. If anyone can help me out, I'd be extremely
>appreciative! Thanks.
SS,
Benchmarks are no
For science fair I'm doing a project on MySQL. For my introduction, I
need some articles, benchmarks, or anything else credible that I can put
in the bibliography. If anyone can help me out, I'd be extremely
appreciative! Thanks.
root,
Saturday, September 14, 2002, 9:55:54 AM, you wrote:
>Description:
r> I want to install MySQL-bench-3.23.52.1.i386.rpm with KDE RPM
r> I get as answer: MySQL-DBI-perl-bin needed.
r> I already had downloaded and installed this module:
r> Mysql
if you have downloaded the src of mysql and installed it you can
find the mysql benchmark in your /usr/local/sql-bench
Else you also have downloads seperately on the mysql site for only
the benchmark (in rpm and others).
Grtz.
Luuk
On 4 Aug 2002, at 1:58, savaidis wrote:
>
> Is the
Is there any standard method or benchmark to run localy or remotly to my
host to help me to setup MySQL better
or to check various computer/configurations?
I could find anything on http://www.mysql.com/information/benchmarks.html
links.
Only at third part software but it is in C++, not .sql
, July 30, 2002, at 09:09 AM, Daniel Kiss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where can I find some benchmark test result documentation.
> First of all, I'm interested in comparing MySQL, Oracle and MSSQL speed
> in different situations.
>
&
Daniel,
Tuesday, July 30, 2002, 4:09:00 PM, you wrote:
DK> Where can I find some benchmark test result documentation.
DK> First of all, I'm interested in comparing MySQL, Oracle and MSSQL speed in
DK> different situations.
Check some links in the manual:
http://www.mys
Hi,
Where can I find some benchmark test result documentation.
First of all, I'm interested in comparing MySQL, Oracle and MSSQL speed in
different situations.
Thanks,
Daniel
-
Before posting, please check:
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: object pool benchmark over 100mbit lan
Hello!
To be fair with the marvellous mysql, I like to post new benchmarks of the
my object pooling over 100mbit LAN.
Previous post are about a Mysql server running into the same machine where
the
> We are developing a benchmark (only querying) between
> MySQL, SQLServer2000, and Access 2000
> We are using as base, the Database propose by TPC.org (www.tpc.org)...
> With the records they propose and the indexes they proposed
>
> But for the testing we are using I
We are developing a benchmark (only querying) between
MySQL, SQLServer2000, and Access 2000
We are using as base, the Database propose by TPC.org (www.tpc.org)...
With the records they propose and the indexes they proposed
But for the testing we are using INNODB tables, with the
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:04:26PM -0600, Tyler Spivey wrote:
> ok - this might seem unbelieveable but:
> why are the benchmarks:
> shell> cd sql-benchmarks #or whatever it is
> shel> perl run-all-tests --user=root --password=password
> and then on another screen i have mysql up -
> and a \s say q
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
