You should use:
SELECT username FROM workflow.user WHERE username LIKE BINARY 'NicO' LIMIT
1;
reference:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/string-comparison-functions.html
On 12/12/05, Nico Sabbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> Hi,
> my mysql always executes case insensitive queries:
>
>
>
Nico Sabbi wrote:
Hi,
my mysql always executes case insensitive queries:
SELECT username FROM workflow.user WHERE username = 'NicO' LIMIT 1;
+--+
| username |
+--+
| nico |
+--+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
that field is of varchar(255) type.
I don't understand the r
Mohsen wrote:
> But himself solved his problem.
> with : mysql_query("SET NAMES utf8");
> Even 4.0.x
Wrong.
I decided to prepare two different versions for my software:
- A MySQL 4.0-friendly version using Romanizing method (Hats off to you,
Ehsan)
- A MySQL 4.1-compatible
AmirBehzad Eslami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/11/2005 18:36:25:
> On 24/11/2005, Alec worte:
>
> > I think this is your problem: MySQL does not properly support
Unicode
> > until version 4.1. I am successfully using FullText with MySQL
> 4.1 to sort
> > UTF-8 encoded Japanese text.
On 24/11/2005, Alec worte:
> I think this is your problem: MySQL does not properly support Unicode
> until version 4.1. I am successfully using FullText with MySQL 4.1 to sort
> UTF-8 encoded Japanese text. I see no reason why it should not work for
> Arabic - if you upgrade.
Dea
AmirBehzad Eslami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/11/2005 17:48:29:
> Dear list,
>
> I'm considering programming a simple "Search Engine" for a website,
> to find Arabic/Persian data within a MySQL database.
> This database contains a huge amount of data, encoded with
Unicode(UTF-8).
>
>
I have solved this problem, I was missing a slash in the path to the data
directory
Thanks,
James
- Original Message -
From: "Gleb Paharenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: Mysql 4.0 cpu usage
> Hello.
>
> A
Hello.
Are you able to connect to the server and found the states of its
threads with SHOW PROCESSLIST statement?
> Mysql 4.1 and 5 will NOT seem to play nice with french characters so I
have tried to
> revert back to 4.0.
>
> I am trying to install 4.0 on a Win2003 Dell PowerEdge 2850
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 15:39 -0300, James Sherwood wrote:
> Mysql 4.1 and 5 will NOT seem to play nice with french characters so I have
> tried to revert back to 4.0.
>
> I am trying to install 4.0 on a Win2003 Dell PowerEdge 2850 and when I run
> the service it uses a constant 25%cpu and seems l
Hello.
It is not clear from you message what's the problem. From your
calculations I can see that the length of int field in a flat
file row (BTW please send a piece of your file) is different
in mysqldump programs with different versions? How is the length
of integer fields related to cha
the version is 4.1.12.
show variables like this,
| character_set_client|
latin1
| character_set_connection|
latin1
| character_set_database |
latin1
| character_se
Hello.
> Any possible problems with this approach?
It is good, if it solved your problems.
>> So it works for me.
>
> I've ended doing this in a different way. I've created a patch which forces=
> a=20
> file to be read - /etc/mysql/mysql-client.conf (which is the same as .my.cn
On Monday 11 of July 2005 16:24, Gleb Paharenko wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I've tested your solution. It doesn't work for users which have SUPER
> privilege. This mentioned at:
> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/server-system-variables.html
>
> However, it works with with ordinary users which don't hav
Hello.
I've tested your solution. It doesn't work for users which have SUPER
privilege. This mentioned at:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/server-system-variables.html
However, it works with with ordinary users which don't have SUPER
privilege. Here are pieces of my my.cnf (the init_co
On Thursday 07 of July 2005 00:16, Gleb Paharenko wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
> For a pity, I could give explanations only for your query about
> selecting @@global.xxx variables. I think server returns correct
> results, because you're selecting global variables, while
> character_set_client, character_se
Hello.
For a pity, I could give explanations only for your query about
selecting @@global.xxx variables. I think server returns correct
results, because you're selecting global variables, while
character_set_client, character_set_connection, character_set_results
are session variables. A
A bit of a warning, if the fields are DATETIME rather than DATE, add the
appropriate hours:minutes:seconds to the test
WHERE datetimefield >'1999-02-01 23:59:59'. When comparing DATETIME fields
with date strings '00:00:00' is assumed and that can cause problems if one
forgets that.
> Have you consi
Sorry. This should have gone back to the list.
-- Mensaje reenviado --
Subject: Re: MySQL 4.0 and concat
Date: Lun 11 Oct 2004 11:37
From: Alfredo Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El Lun 11 Oct 2004 08:35, escribió:
> Have you considered NOT comparing
Have you considered NOT comparing dates as strings but rather as date
values? That will avoid the use of CONCAT() completely.
SELECT *
FROM sampletable
WHERE datefield >= '1999-01-12' and datefield <'1999-02-01'
This example query will get all of the records from sampletable that were
entere
cess denied for user: '@localhost' to database 'mysql'
I can only bypass this error if I use -u root ?
Thanks,
Francois A
-Original Message-
From: Julian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 12:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mysql 4.0 windows
> May someone please send me the link to download mysql Binary distribution
> for the first time on windows XP, I have looked into mysql/downloads and
> they only have X86.
Windows XP, and every other windows platform, runs on X86 architecture.
That is the download you want.
Jeff
--
My
It's possibly due to your ssh connection but I couldn't answer you about
this because I only use mysql with phpmyadmin.
Regards
Yves wrote:
Thanks,
As it turns out, I was trying show variables like --
And had a syntax mistake
Does SHOW VARIABLES only show a certain number of
lines? When I ran
Thanks,
As it turns out, I was trying show variables like --
And had a syntax mistake
Does SHOW VARIABLES only show a certain number of
lines? When I ran this command, character_set was not
listed... the list seemed cut off just before it.
Unless it is an issue with SSH only showing x amoun
You can see it by executing the "SHOW VARIABLES" query on your server.
You will find the used charset in the 'character_set' variable.
You can also use the query "SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'character_set'" which
will directly match what you want.
Yves wrote:
Hello,
How can I see what char set is bein
Garg, Piyush (EM, GECIS) wrote:
Hi Everybody,
Is there any way we can tranform the Stores procedure and Triggers present under Oracle Custom Application to mysql.
Please tell ways or any tools which can help us rewrite the logic in Mysql.
Thanks and regards,
Piyush
Stored Procedures ar
At 17:25 -0700 3/16/04, Sasha Pachev wrote:
Kevin Carpenter wrote:
While downloading this a I got a number of virus warnings from
McAfee. I aborted the download.
Anyone else experienced this?
I emailed MySQL but didn't hear back.
Kevin:
Were you downloading a Windows or some other binary? If i
Kevin Carpenter wrote:
While downloading this a I got a number of virus warnings from McAfee. I aborted the download.
Anyone else experienced this?
I emailed MySQL but didn't hear back.
Kevin:
Were you downloading a Windows or some other binary? If it was Windows, I would
be concerned - the bu
Here are the instructions for doing a stack trace.
http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Using_stack_trace.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 2/13/04, 2:24:30 PM, Jaco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you perform a stack trace?
No, how do I do that?
/Jacob
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you perform a stack trace?
>> Original Message <<
On 2/13/04, 2:36:42 AM, Jacob Friis Larsen "[Eksperten" "admin]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding MySQL 4.0 crashed; Please help:
> Can someone help me find out what caused this crash?
> My system is a Red
he questions.
I have 3.23 that came with my Linux distribution and it's not
uninstalled -- but I don't think that should be the cause, though.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does the .err file tell you?
-Original Message-
From: Zhao, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MySQL 4.0 Installation Problem -- trying again
Thanks ... but yeas, I have done both
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MySQL 4.0 Installation Problem -- trying again
Charles,
First, you need to run the mysql_install_db script. That
Fatal error: Can't open privilege tables: Can't find file:
'./mysql/host.frm' (errno 13) ...
Well, since I failed to use RPM to install MySQL 4.0 over 3.23 -- I am
not sure if I have to unstall the latter before I install the former,
the manual does not mention that, I went ahead to do a fresh bi
Gabriel Ricard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running MySQL 4.0.14 on Mac OS X 10.2.6 on a development server. We
> have around 60 tables on the development server and the production
> servers. 18 tables that exist on the production server are replicated
> to our development server. We use the
Devin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I noticed that my MySQL 4.0.13 Slave Replication server is having
> a wierd problem. If you look at the master.info file on the slave
> it keeps updating like it is really updating the slave but in
> the mysql.err log it shows:
>
> 030609 16:12:08 Slave I/O t
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 24 May 2003, Egor Egorov wrote:
>
>> DAVID CLARK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > OK, I messed up. I've been running MySQL 3.23, and I
>> > wanted to upgrade to 4.0 so I could use the new
>> > boolean functions. So I downloaded th
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 18:49, Juan wrote:
> Does the last binary version available of MySQL
> (4.0xx) support UNICODE?
Unicode will be available since 4.1. There is no binaries for 4.1 yet.
--
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is spons
* Dieter Stelzner
[...]
> I have opened a conection to a MySQL-Server database. How I can get a list
> of all available tables inside the database via ODBC with an SQL
> statement?
Send a "SHOW TABLES" command. Full syntax:
SHOW [OPEN] TABLES [FROM db_name] [LIKE wild]
http://www.mysql.com/doc/e
hi all,
i get the following error logdid anyone try to compile mysql with ssl before?
030116 14:34:13 InnoDB: Started
/usr/local/mysql-4.0.9-gamma/libexec/mysqld: ready for connections
mysqld got signal 11;
This could be because you hit a bug. It is also possible that this binary
or one of t
Your probably better off getting it and compiling it by hand.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Florin Andrei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 4:36 PM
Subject: MySQL-4.0 and PHP with Red Hat 8.0
> Anyone tried to use MySQL-4.0 and the precom
That optimization is for fields without an index AFAIK.
Sincerely,
Steven Roussey
http://Network54.com/?pp=e
sql,query
-
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.c
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Dean Ellis wrote:
> The annoying thing about it, for me, is that MySQL 4.0 has been perfectly
> stable and perfectly usable for us until 4.0.3, which so far has yet to
> produce a usable client library. I keep pulling from CVS and recompiling,
> hoping that one day soon I
Hello
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Quinten Steenhuis wrote:
> Has anyone successfully gotten MySQL 4.02 running on Debian? I'm
> running into problems if I use alien to convert the RPMs.
Yep, we're using 4.0.2 on Debian. You may want to grab MySQL .tar.gz
instead of .rpm and install it somewhere into /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sql,query ...
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 02:30 pm, walt wrote:
> There has been some issues with gcc 3.x if I remember correctly. I know
> RedHat released another beta because of problems with gcc 3.x. Have you
> tried it on a box with gcc 2.9x ?
Dean Ellis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 27 August 2002 11:39 am, Lenz Grimmer wrote:
> > As soon as it actually *is* stable :)
> >
> > On a more serious note, we are currently working on preparing the first
> > release of 4.0 (4.0.3) that will be declar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 11:39 am, Lenz Grimmer wrote:
> As soon as it actually *is* stable :)
>
> On a more serious note, we are currently working on preparing the first
> release of 4.0 (4.0.3) that will be declared "Beta" instead of "Alpha".
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 17:17, Scott Pippin wrote:
> When will MySQL 4.0 be released as a stable version?
As soon as it actually *is* stable :)
On a more serious note, we are currently working on preparing the first
release of 4.0 (4.0.3)
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:17:46AM -0600, Scott Pippin wrote:
> When will MySQL 4.0 be released as a stable version?
Where there have been no reported bugs for a sufficient amount of
time.
Jeremy
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 09:50:33PM -0400, Quinten Steenhuis wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Has anyone successfully gotten MySQL 4.02 running on Debian? I'm running
> into problems if I use alien to convert the RPMs. I could install from
> source, but I want to avoid cruftiness and make it easy to upg
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 04:21:43PM +0200, Sander Pilon wrote:
>
> It has not been for us. Replication, query cache and fulltext stuff
> is borked. But, it's an alpha. Alpha's aren't supposed to be stable.
What replication problems have you seen?
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Technic
Hi,
I've currently my website and two forum which runs with MySQL 4.0.2
flawlessly (and which a huge number of visitors for one of my forum).
mysql> \s
--
mysql Ver 12.10 Distrib 4.0.2-alpha, for pc-linux-gnu (i686)
Connection id: 125151
Current database:
Current user:
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
> On Thu 2002-06-27 at 16:33:43 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >
>> But Still Noone have throwed some light on the Date when MySql 4.0
>> Release will be made formally which could enable me to use the Unions
>> Can anyone in this group please let m
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 13:11
> To: Arul
> Cc: MySQL
> Subject: Re: MYSQL 4.0
>
>
> Arul wrote:
>
> >Hi
> >
> >Any idea when MySQL 4.0 stable release wi
Hi.
On Thu 2002-06-27 at 16:33:43 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> But Still Noone have throwed some light on the Date when MySql 4.0 Release
> will be made formally which could enable me to use the Unions
>
> Can anyone in this group please let me know...
Nobody throws in a date, because
Hi
I'm running MySQL 4.0.2 compiled from the source tree on this site:
www.gnist.no (The largest online bookstore in Norway)
Used 4.0.1 earlier but that version had some small problems with fulltext
search.
Server version: 4.0.2-alpha-log
Uptime: 2 days 12 hours 40 min 2
uot;Thomas Spahni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "MySQL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:42 AM
Subject: Re: MYSQL 4.0
> Hi Thomas
>
> I am always ready to give a try ..
> But u see Managers will not be ready to take such a risk...and Morever our
Arul wrote:
>Hi
>
>Any idea when MySQL 4.0 stable release will be made..
>As of now only Alpha is released..
>
>Also any sites which run on 4.0 Alpha
>
>
>
4.0.1 has been very stable for us:
[root@db1 root]# mysqladmin version
mysqladmin Ver 8.23 Distrib 4.0.1-alpha, for pc-linux-gnu on i6
ni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "MySQL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: MYSQL 4.0
> Hi Thomas
>
> I am always ready to give a try ..
> But u see Managers will not be ready to take such a risk...and Morever our
> client w
t;
Cc: "MySQL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: MYSQL 4.0
> Arul,
>
> as you are intending to use open source software for free why not give it
> a try and help with debugging?
>
> 4.0.1 is remarkably stable except for some g
Arul,
as you are intending to use open source software for free why not give it
a try and help with debugging?
4.0.1 is remarkably stable except for some glitches in replication and
boolean fulltext search. Alpha status applies mainly to the newly
developed features.
Go ahead and have fun!
Thom
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 05:27:29PM +0930, G r e g L a w r i e wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> Would you mind sharing how many machines 'half your servers' might
> be, what type of work are they doing and how long have they been up
> for / how stable would you consider them to be?
Half of "my" server is,
TED]]
Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2002 16:23
To: Arul
Cc: MySQL
Subject: Re: MYSQL 4.0
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:15:11PM +0530, Arul wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any idea when MySQL 4.0 stable release will be made..
> As of now only Alpha is released..
Rumor has it that 4.0.2 might be beta.
> Also any sit
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:15:11PM +0530, Arul wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any idea when MySQL 4.0 stable release will be made..
> As of now only Alpha is released..
Rumor has it that 4.0.2 might be beta.
> Also any sites which run on 4.0 Alpha
Yes. Half my servers have been moved to what will be 4.0.2.
What table types are you using?
Anthony
> I've been running 4.0.1-alpha on a development server for our new internet
> bookstore. Holds around 1.3million books, 100k bookcovers and a lot of
> other information.
>
> I haven't experienced any crash/problems except for one bug that brings
> down My
I've been running 4.0.1-alpha on a development server for our new internet
bookstore. Holds around 1.3million books, 100k bookcovers and a lot of other
information.
I haven't experienced any crash/problems except for one bug that brings down
MySQL: using two 'match-against' in fulltext search wit
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 07:16:34AM -0700, va ku wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We want to use only MYSQL4.0 for our production database. Please
> let us know when the Beta release is scheduled.
When it's ready. :-)
Seriously, check the archives. This comes up a lot and the answer is
nearly always the same.
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 01:21:44PM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> On Saturday 09 March 2002 12:46 pm, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> > That reminds me of an easy feature request. ?Would it be possible to
> > have a slave-auto-start=no option (or something like that) in my.cnf?
> > There have been cases whe
On Saturday 09 March 2002 12:46 pm, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> That reminds me of an easy feature request. ?Would it be possible to
> have a slave-auto-start=no option (or something like that) in my.cnf?
> There have been cases when I want to start a server but do not want
> replication to start on i
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 12:31:20PM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
>
> Jeremy:
>
> I think I now understand what happened, or at least I have a
> pausilble theory that explains what I see in the logs.
>
> When I had you kill the broken mysqld last time it went down in the
> middle of updating db3-re
On Thursday 07 March 2002 10:48 pm, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> The 4.0.x slave I had just rebuilt the other day died about 40 minutes
> ago and produced a core file each time. ?It got caught in the cycle of
> "core dump, restart, core dump, restart..."
Jeremy:
I think I now understand what happened
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:10:02PM -0800, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> >
> > I have tracked down and fixed the assertion failure issue. However,
> > I am still not certail why the sql thread does partial reads. I have
> > pushed my fix into the public tree, so let's have you pull it and
> > try again.
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:14:31PM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> On Thursday 07 March 2002 10:48 pm, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> > The 4.0.x slave I had just rebuilt the other day died about 40 minutes
> > ago and produced a core file each time. ?It got caught in the cycle of
> > "core dump, restart, c
On Thursday 07 March 2002 10:48 pm, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> The 4.0.x slave I had just rebuilt the other day died about 40 minutes
> ago and produced a core file each time. ?It got caught in the cycle of
> "core dump, restart, core dump, restart..."
Jeremy:
I have tracked down and fixed the asse
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 10:41:32AM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> On Thursday 07 March 2002 11:39 pm, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> > 020307 21:39:03 ?Error in Log_event::read_log_event(): 'read error',
> data_len=193,event_type=2
> > 020307 21:39:03 ?Slave SQL thread: I/O error reading
> event(errno=-1
On Thursday 07 March 2002 11:39 pm, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> 020307 21:39:03 ?Error in Log_event::read_log_event(): 'read error',
data_len=193,event_type=2
> 020307 21:39:03 ?Slave SQL thread: I/O error reading
event(errno=-1,cur_log->error=57)
> assertion "mi->io_thd == thd" failed: file "slave.
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 09:48:41PM -0800, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> Hey Sasha,
[snip]
> I'll keep it off-line until I hear from you on what data you need.
Oops. Here's the info form the error log:
---snip---
020307 21:39:03 Slave I/O thread initialized
020307 21:39:03 Slave SQL thread initia
Varshavchick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gentlemen,
>
> Can you advice please if I'd wish to change the database format from
> myisam to innodb should I upgrade to mysql 4.0 to get better performance
> and stability, or switching to innodb alone under 3.23 will do the
> trick?
Switc
Hi!
First, please don't email things directly to me or to the announce
list. The best way to get help for a problem, is to write an email
only to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; In the future, please also change the
subject line to something that is appropriate and don't respond to an
email that has nothin
Hello,
I'm encountering a serious program fault at using MySQL Win32 client library
LIBMYSQL.DLL.
I found LIBMYSQL.DLL not thread-safe. When 10 threads are launched to run
the following two blocks of C statements, very quickly a program fault
window pops up to LIBMYSQL.DLL.
block #1 --
Hi, glad to hear that it is not only me...
I got the same error on Pentium 200MMX, even when compiling the
source. I found that configure prepared gcc for Pentium Pro, so the quick
and dirty
fix was to hardcode Pentium into the configure script.
This must be a bug...
Tor Rune Skoglund, Gyldenlø
Harald Fuchs writes:
> In article ,
> Robert Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm getting the exact same error when trying to install MySQL 4.0 on RedHat 7.0 --
>both the binary distribution and the RPM.
> > Previous binary versions of MySQL have
I'm getting the exact same error when trying to install MySQL 4.0 on RedHat 7.0 --
both the binary distribution and the RPM.
Previous binary versions of MySQL have worked just fine on the same machine.
/Rob
At 10:07 -0800 2001/12/06, em huynh wrote:
>I also tried using the binary distribution
Hi!
On Nov 26, sherzodR wrote:
>
>
> Use "%" instead of "*"
>
> cheers
> --
> sherzodR
>
>
> On 26 Nov 2001, Harald Fuchs wrote:
>
> >According to the manual, section "New Features of Full-text Search to
> >Appear in MySQL 4.0":
> >
> >* `*' is a truncation operator.
> >
> >The query
> > S
Use "%" instead of "*"
cheers
--
sherzodR
On 26 Nov 2001, Harald Fuchs wrote:
>According to the manual, section "New Features of Full-text Search to
>Appear in MySQL 4.0":
>
>* `*' is a truncation operator.
>
>The query
> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM documents WHERE MATCH(txt) AGAINST ('Versailles'
johnlucas-Arluna writes:
> Hi folks
>
> I really need to use some of the new features of version 4, particularly the
> UNION joins.
>
> Has anyone had any experience with using the UNION, does it work ok and
> fast?
>
> Also, could you indicate your confidence level with regard to running ver
>
> I think MySQL 4.0.0 is in it's alpha state.
> Wouldn't it be more right to get a 4.0.0 beta and several release
candidates than a 4.0.1 version?
4.0 is in its alpha state. 4.0.0 is the first alpha release, and 4.0.1 the
second and so on. It is, IMO, essential to give every release its own
id
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:13 AM
Subject: Re: MySQL 4.0 updated?
> When a new version is available it will have a new version number. The
> current version is 4.0.0 but there will almost certainly be a 4.0.1
> soon. If y
When a new version is available it will have a new version number. The
current version is 4.0.0 but there will almost certainly be a 4.0.1
soon. If you look at the change history in the documentation, there have
already been changes put into 4.0.0.
If you need quicker access to changes, you ca
Ed Carp writes:
> >Description:
>
> make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/mysql-4.0.0-alpha/sql'
> gcc -DMYSQL_SERVER -DDEFAULT_MYSQL_HOME="\"/usr/local\"" -
> DDATADIR="\"/usr/local/var\"" -DSHAREDIR="\"/usr/local/share/mysql
> \""
Sommai Fongnamthip wrote:
> Hi,
> If I install mysql-4.0 to upgrade in mysql-3.23.xx with old setting value
> (use myisam type), Could I need to change or re-load my old db?
AFAIK, If you are keeping the table type, you can just copy the .MYI, .MYD, and .frm
files to the new location. O
Hi!
On Oct 19, Mark Maunder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this is a bug. The script to recreate the problem is included
> below. This problem appears consistently as long as there's a fulltext
> index and a regular index on the same field and you do an update to
> change the case of a single char.
I
Mark Maunder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this is a bug. The script to recreate the problem is included
> below. This problem appears consistently as long as there's a fulltext
> index and a regular index on the same field and you do an update to
> change the case of a single char. It doesn't matter
> Britt> o Lock optimization - MySQL executor acquired
> Britt> more locks than required for common queries.
>
> Just a note: The extra locks are only relevant for Gemini and BDB tables,
> not for MyISAM or InnoDB tables.
The extra locks issue does apply to InnoDB for update statements
Hi!
First I have to apologize to the email list for this discussion: It
certainly doesn't belong here. On the other hand, as the creator of
MySQL and one who has personally sued by NuSphere corporation I can't
let things like this go unanswered.
> "Britt" == Britt Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi!
> "Britt" == Britt Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Britt> Now that the patch for Gemini has been created and made
Britt> available for the new MySQL 4.0 alpha release we are
Britt> back whole again.
I wouldn't really agree with this.
Britt> I am told that binaries for the compl
Hi!
> "Michael" == Michael Furgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Monty and all:
Michael> I have re-applied all the Gemini table handler support and
Michael> ported it to MySQL 4.0. It is too large to send as an email
Michael> so the patch can be found at:
Michael> ftp://ftp.nusphe
:31 AM
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: MySQL 4.0 - Order By & Limit
>
>
>
> Point well taken.. The query is as follows:-
>
> SELECT * FROM dddeli WHERE title LIKE "%$keyword%" ORDER BY title
> desc LIMIT $start,$end;
>
> Where $keyword is the k
Now that the patch for Gemini has been created and made
available for the new MySQL 4.0 alpha release we are
back whole again.
I am told that binaries for the complete MySQL 4.0
with support for Gemini tables are now available via
mysql.org for everyone to use (MyISAM and InnoDB also).
These
> Hi!
>
> > "Michael" == Michael T Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 12:49:26AM +0300, Michael Widenius wrote:
> >> We agreed a long time ago with NuSphere that the small hooks would be
> >> copyrighted by MySQL AB, but as the concrete paperwork has not
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo