Re: Compiling RTG on EL9

Total blast from the past, Nick! We're using rtg2 on our network and John, I appreciate you sending this link over with the update.  Just discussing internally that we need to get this server updated and not sure how that'll all go over. Best wishes, Drew! Best Regards, Jason On 7/12/24

Re: Compiling RTG on EL9

Have you tried the rtg2 fork on github? https://github.com/synergycp/RTG2 Its still pretty old, like 2009, but there was an update made just 2 years ago with MariaDB support. I stopped using rtg/rtg2 around 2015, but I was always a huge fan of it. -John > On Jul 12, 2024, at 6:19 PM, Nick

Re: Compiling RTG on EL9

Drew Weaver wrote on 12/07/2024 14:37: I am just curious with the demise of EL7 if anyone else is working on trying to compile RTG for EL9. If you don’t know what RTG is it’s just an old SNMP poller/graph plotter that some networks have found useful in the past. Drew, Whoa, that's some

Re: IRR mirrors de-sync from ARIN or irrd4 bug or ARIN streaming is broken?

>From the CAIDA study on this : "In October 2021, we found matching Route Origin Authorization objects (ROAs) for around 20% of RADB IRR records, and a consistency of 38% and 60% in v4 and v6." Do think much

Re: eero outage

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 06:10:24PM -0700, Warren Kumari wrote: >On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 5:56 PM, Niels Bakker <[1]niels=na...@bakker.net> >wrote: > > * [2]war...@kumari.net (Warren Kumari) [Wed 10 Jul 2024, 23:03 CEST]: > >More seriously, erm, you mean Eero like the wireless

Re: Dissecting the FCC’s Proposal to Improve BGP Security

> On Jul 11, 2024, at 11:02, t...@pelican.org wrote: > As a not-security person trying to get to grips with this, am I > mis-understanding the type of attack that this is pushing to mitigate? > My current understanding: > -Bad guys announce space for Facebook / Amazon / banks / whatever > -Some

RE: Dissecting the FCC’s Proposal to Improve BGP Security

On Thursday, 11 July, 2024 07:23, "Hank Nussbacher" said: > [ > https://www.kentik.com/blog/dissecting-the-fccs-proposal-to-improve-bgp-security/ > ]( > https://www.kentik.com/blog/dissecting-the-fccs-proposal-to-improve-bgp-security/ > ) As a not-security person trying to get to grips with

Re: IRR mirrors de-sync from ARIN or irrd4 bug or ARIN streaming is broken?

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 07:10:48PM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote: > nothing! I suspect the mirror is out of sync. > > Now NTT mirror: Seems reloading helped: $ date Thu Jul 11 03:50:22 UTC 2024 $ whois -h rr.ntt.net 199.52.73.0/24 route: 199.52.73.0/24 origin: AS132055 descr:

Re: IRR mirrors de-sync from ARIN or irrd4 bug or ARIN streaming is broken?

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:37:22PM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 9:26 PM Job Snijders via NANOG > wrote: > > > Indeed, it appears both NTT’s and RADB’s mirror instances are > > desynchronized in relationship to ARIN’s IRR. Both NTT and RADB > > should do a database

Re: IRR mirrors de-sync from ARIN or irrd4 bug or ARIN streaming is broken?

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 9:26 PM Job Snijders via NANOG wrote: > > > Aliaksei, > > Indeed, it appears both NTT’s and RADB’s mirror instances are > desynchronized in relationship to ARIN’s IRR. Both NTT and RADB should do a > database reload to rectify the issue. > > Desynchronisation can happen

Re: IRR mirrors de-sync from ARIN or irrd4 bug or ARIN streaming is broken?

Rubens, ARIN-NONAUTH was deprecated two years ago: https://www.arin.net/vault/announcements/20220404-irr/ Aliaksei, Indeed, it appears both NTT’s and RADB’s mirror instances are desynchronized in relationship to ARIN’s IRR. Both NTT and RADB should do a database reload to rectify the issue.

Re: IRR mirrors de-sync from ARIN or irrd4 bug or ARIN streaming is broken?

If you look at TC, you will see that this object is part of ARIN-NONAUTH: https://bgp.net.br/whois.html?q=199.52.73.0%2F24 route: 199.52.72.0/22 descr: Ernst & Young, Gurgaon Cyberpark, India origin: AS132055 mnt-by: MNT-EYL changed:

Re: eero outage

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 5:56 PM, Niels Bakker wrote: > * war...@kumari.net (Warren Kumari) [Wed 10 Jul 2024, 23:03 CEST]: > > More seriously, erm, you mean Eero like the wireless devices? Aren't they > supposed to be mesh wifi thingies, and so traffic is local? Like, if eero. > com / an eero

Re: eero outage

One post says it was working an hour ago. https://www.reddit.com/r/amazoneero/comments/1e07nlj/eero_up_down/ On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 5:56 PM Niels Bakker wrote: > * war...@kumari.net (Warren Kumari) [Wed 10 Jul 2024, 23:03 CEST]: > >More seriously, erm, you mean Eero like the wireless devices?

Re: eero outage

* war...@kumari.net (Warren Kumari) [Wed 10 Jul 2024, 23:03 CEST]: More seriously, erm, you mean Eero like the wireless devices? Aren't they supposed to be mesh wifi thingies, and so traffic is local? Like, if eero.com / an eero service goes down, well, … ¯\_(ツ)_/¯? From what I can tell from

Re: eero outage

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 3:06 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > Does anyone know about the big eero outage going on? > If only there was some sort of outages list, where big outages would be discussed…[0] More seriously, erm, you mean Eero like the wireless devices? Aren't they supposed to be mesh wifi

Re: Akamai connectivity issue across several states

Hello, just saw this - I'll ping you off-list. On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 04:07:09PM +, Schylar Utley wrote: >We are seeing significant connectivity issues across several states to >what appears to be only Akamai served websites. > > > >Most of all the traceroutes to

Re: Netrality NOC contact?

Thank you to everyone who responded off-list. Finally got things sorted out. Nothing like losing a line-card on a holiday weekend ...  On 7/6/24 16:36, Bryan Holloway wrote: Trying to get a hold of a meat-popsicle in Netrality's NOC. Their web-site only lists an e-mail address and no

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS?

On 2024-07-06 14:57, Crist Clark wrote: If you’re LG, you own the software, you do cert pinning. Also, realize many (most? almost all?) are going to outsource the management of their vanity TLD to one of the existing companies in that market. Think of a brand that sells, I don’t know, shoes.

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

On 7/5/24 3:53 AM, Jeroen Massar via NANOG wrote: And... we all still have ICANN as an ultimate power, and the TLD itself, next to the above registrar. If you recall the facebook outage from last year, one of the interesting things from it was they are their own registrar for their domains.

Re: HE.net problem

On Thu 04 Jul 2024 18:16:28 GMT, Randy Bush wrote: > hak whacked me to add > http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/nagios-plugins/check_zone_rrsig_expiration.html > to my nagios deployment. > > anyone have some known sick in various ways dns zones against which to > test? Those domains are

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

FWIW I think TLDs should cost much more, like millions, other than where they provide legitimate internationalization or specific community service functions (TBD.) 1. They're just polluting the name space, many seem frivolous like .RODEO or .FISHING (yeah those are real.) 2. Vanity corporate

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS?

On 7/6/24 8:06 PM, Robert McKay via NANOG wrote: On 2024-07-06 21:11, John Von Essen wrote: Ok…. now a rabbit hole. I looked at some vanity TLDs, and it appears the ALOT of big companies have their names as TLDs, but almost none of them are using it for anything. Why is that? Is it just a

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS?

On 07/07/2024, 01:06:59, "Robert McKay via NANOG" wrote: People aren't used to URLs not ending in .com or possibly their local ccTLD. Anything else looks suspicious or isn't even recognised as a URL and less people will visit it. True but when you are multinational you probably have a

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

> If I have an LG TV and it wants to update to .LG and LG is > DNSSEC signing the whole chain, that sure seems more likely to be legit > than .lg.tv or some such. .lg and .he were mentioned as possible brand TLDs, but those are not allowed, because they are reserved for possible ccTLDs. gTLDs are

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS?

On 2024-07-06 21:11, John Von Essen wrote: Ok…. now a rabbit hole. I looked at some vanity TLDs, and it appears the ALOT of big companies have their names as TLDs, but almost none of them are using it for anything. Why is that? Is it just a copyright play to protect the name from some else

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

According to Bill Woodcock : >-=-=-=-=-=- > > > >> On Jul 6, 2024, at 22:41, Paul Ebersman wrote: >> I've been surprised that none of the folks that got TLDs seem to be >> leveraging the technical/security brand protection like they could. > >A few are. A very few. SNCF. A few banks. I can't

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

It appears that Bill Woodcock said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >> On Jul 6, 2024, at 22:11, John Von Essen wrote: >> I saw something online that said $250,000 but that didn’t make sense if its >> all paperwork. > >Heh. I see you are unfamiliar with ICANN. They’ve said that same paperwork >is likely to

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

If you’re LG, you own the software, you do cert pinning. Also, realize many (most? almost all?) are going to outsource the management of their vanity TLD to one of the existing companies in that market. Think of a brand that sells, I don’t know, shoes. Running a TLD is not part of their core

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

> On Jul 6, 2024, at 22:41, Paul Ebersman wrote: > I've been surprised that none of the folks that got TLDs seem to be > leveraging the technical/security brand protection like they could. A few are. A very few. SNCF. A few banks. > If I have an LG TV and it wants to update to .LG and LG

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

essen> I saw something online that said $250,000 but that didn't make essen> sense if its all paperwork. woody> Heh. I see you are unfamiliar with ICANN. They've said that woody> same paperwork is likely to cost $375k in ICANN staff time for woody> the next round. Because, you know, inflation

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

> On Jul 6, 2024, at 22:11, John Von Essen wrote: > I saw something online that said $250,000 but that didn’t make sense if its > all paperwork. Heh. I see you are unfamiliar with ICANN. They’ve said that same paperwork is likely to cost $375k in ICANN staff time for the next round.

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

I've found this conversation hugely of interest… The below isn't really a question, more of a high level clarification/further thinking. First, what actually happened and the impact (correct me if any of this is wrong): A stupid phishing complaint to NetSol by a 3rd party got he.net put into

Re: getting the memo, Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

See how little it has been necessary for me to pay attention to them since my net handle was assigned back in the early 90s or maybe late 80s? ;-) Cheers, -- jra3 On July 6, 2024 11:11:50 AM EDT, John Levine wrote: >According to Jay R. Ashworth : >>data I heard that that *was* a registry-side

Re: getting the memo, Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

According to Jay R. Ashworth : >data I heard that that *was* a registry-side hold (and hence it didn't matter >that it was NetSol). Or perhaps that NetSol was still the registry for .net -- >that's out of date now, isn't it? Uh, yeah, Verisign spun off the NetSol registrar over 20 years ago in

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

- Original Message - > From: "Robert L Mathews" > > However, if "example.com" uses "ns1.he.net" and "ns2.he.net" as its > nameservers, > having the second of those instead be "ns2.he.org" will keep "www.example.com" > reachable if he.net is placed on clientHold. > > That was presumably

Re: TLD jingle mail, Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 6:25 PM John Levine wrote: > > Also, getting your own TLD doesn't necessarily make your risks less, it just > makes them different. You now have a direct relationship with the registry > back end provider that you have to not screw up, and due to ICANN's rules, > there is

Re: TLD jingle mail, Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

It appears that Bill Woodcock said: >ICANN’s going to open another round of TLD applications, and I expect a lot of >companies to go into that with their eyes more >open than last time, knowing why they’re doing it. It’s not about brand >protection, it’s about disintermediating the root >of

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

no risk of our domain names getting put on clientHold, but I still don't trust the *registry* not to put one of our domain names on their equivalent "serverHold". We provide nameservers for our customers in .net, .biz and .org (run by separate companies) to mitigate that risk. And

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

ebersman> - don't have all your business critical domains under the same ebersman> registrar (unless it's of the CSC/markmonitor class) jeroen> There is always going to be single point of failures in a jeroen> hierarchical tree like that. Everything in internet/infrastructure is risk tradeoffs

Re: Out-of-Bailiwick DNS? (Was: HE.net problem)

> On Jul 5, 2024, at 09:53, Jeroen Massar via NANOG wrote: > Please note that: > - Markmonitor is owned by Newfold Digital / Endurance International [1] > - Network Solutions is owned by Web.com [2] > - Web.com is... owned by Newfold Digital [3] > > And...

Re: HE.net problem

>> what foss dns monitoring tools do folk use to alert of >> - iminent delegation expiry >> - inconsistent service (lame, soa mismatches, ...) >> - dnssec signing and timer issues >> - etc. > https://github.com/berthubert/simplomon thanks. may play hak whacked me to add

Re: HE.net problem

On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 at 06:59, Randy Bush wrote: > not to distract from everyone diagnosing someone else's problem, but ... > > what foss dns monitoring tools do folk use to alert of > - iminent delegation expiry > - inconsistent service (lame, soa mismatches, ...) > - dnssec signing and

Re: HE.net problem

.  Ryan Hamel From: Mel Beckman <m...@beckman.org> Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2024 12:20 PM To: Jay Ashworth <j...@baylink.com> Cc: Ryan Hamel <r...@rkhtech.org>; nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: HE.net problem   Caution: This is an external em

Re: HE.net problem

aylink.com>> Cc: Ryan Hamel mailto:r...@rkhtech.org>>; nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org> mailto:nanog@nanog.org>> Subject: Re: HE.net problem Caution: This is an external email and may be malicious. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments. Ou

Re: HE.net problem

> On 4 Jul 2024, at 21:53, Crist Clark wrote: > >  > On the other side of this, we all may be learning the value of not having all > of you NS records in a single zone with a domain under a single registrar. The majority of real large DNS hosting providers have their authoritative under

Re: HE.net problem

not to distract from everyone diagnosing someone else's problem, but ... what foss dns monitoring tools do folk use to alert of - iminent delegation expiry - inconsistent service (lame, soa mismatches, ...) - dnssec signing and timer issues - etc. randy

Re: HE.net problem

After a metric ton of screaming, we did get the issue solved. Thanks everyone, and we WILL be following up with the powers that be. Reid On Thu, Jul 4, 2024, 3:31 PM Reid Fishler wrote: > Network Solutions has decided to put our domain name on Client Hold due to > a single phishing complaint

Re: HE.net problem

cjc> On the other side of this, we all may be learning the value of not cjc> having all of you NS records in a single zone with a domain under a cjc> single registrar. >From some trainings I did on how to be sure your DNS was robust: - don't have all your business critical domains under the

Re: HE.net problem

It appears that Reid Fishler via NANOG said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Network Solutions has decided to put our domain name on Client Hold due to >a single phishing complaint about a web page, which happens to just be a >page of information about another domain from bgp.he.net. Network Solutions >has been

Re: HE.net problem

.org > Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2024 4:52:14 PM > Subject: Re: HE.net problem > On the other side of this, we all may be learning the value of not having > all of you NS records in a single zone with a domain under a single > registrar. > > (From someone who has personal domains h

Re: HE.net problem

*Sent:* Thursday, July 4, 2024 12:20 PM > *To:* Jay Ashworth > *Cc:* Ryan Hamel ; nanog@nanog.org > *Subject:* Re: HE.net problem > > Caution: This is an external email and may be malicious. Please take care > when clicking links or opening attachments. > > Our he.net dns a

Re: HE.net problem

jra> We have a report on outages that he.net has been placed in ICANN jra> client hold, and people's DNS service is falling over on this jra> Independence day. Seems to have had hold removed 20:20 zulu, according to whois. Domain back in .net and working again.

Re: HE.net problem

anything for that domain. At the moment, a simple DNS trace (dig he.net +trace) cannot complete fully. Ryan Hamel From: Mel Beckman Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2024 12:20 PM To: Jay Ashworth Cc: Ryan Hamel ; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: HE.net problem Caution

Re: HE.net problem

Network Solutions has decided to put our domain name on Client Hold due to a single phishing complaint about a web page, which happens to just be a page of information about another domain from bgp.he.net. Network Solutions has been contacted, and refuses to handle this issue in ANY expedited

Re: HE.net problem

fully. Ryan Hamel From: Mel Beckman Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2024 12:20 PM To: Jay Ashworth Cc: Ryan Hamel ; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: HE.net problem Caution: This is an external email and may be malicious. Please take care when clicking links or opening

Re: HE.net problem

. At the moment, a simple DNS trace (dig he.net +trace) cannot complete fully. Ryan Hamel From: Mel Beckman Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2024 12:20 PM To: Jay Ashworth Cc: Ryan Hamel ; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: HE.net problem Caution: This is an external email

Re: HE.net problem

I've been informed that the CEO of HE is on this as of 1512EDT. I approve of the scale of this response. :-) Cheers, -- jra On July 4, 2024 2:55:34 PM EDT, Jay Ashworth wrote: >We have a report on outages that he.net has been placed in ICANN client hold, >and people's DNS service is falling

Re: HE.net problem

Our he.net dns appears to be fine at this time: $ nslookup server ns1.he.net Default server: ns1.he.net Address: 2001:470:100::2#53 Default server: ns1.he.net Address: 216.218.130.2#53 > set type=A > jet.net. Server: ns1.he.net Address:216.218.130.2#53 Name: jet.net Address:

Re: HE.net problem

Cool, thanks. We had a couple of other reports of people making support calls and being asked to reboot their modems, so I wanted to make sure tier 3 had gotten it. And I figured tier 3 would be here. :-) Cheers, -- jra On July 4, 2024 3:00:12 PM EDT, Ryan Hamel wrote: >I called their

Re: HE.net problem

I called their support when that outage thread came in, they're already aware and taking a look now. Ryan Hamel From: NANOG on behalf of Jay Ashworth Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2024 11:55 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: HE.net problem Caution: This is an

Re: charging for config changess

0bruyn%22%20%3caa...@heyaaron.com%3e>> > *To*: heasley > > *Cc*: North American Network Operators' Group > > *Subject*: Re: charging for config changess > *Date*: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 13:39:54 -0700 > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 11:01 AM heasley wrote: > > Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 02:

Re: charging for config changess

Reply-To: Aaron C. de Bruyn mailto:%22aaron%20c.%20de%20bruyn%22%20%3caa...@heyaaron.com%3e>> To: heasley mailto:heasley%20%3ch...@shrubbery.net%3e>> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group mailto:North%20American%20Network%20Operators'%20group%20%3cna...@nanog.org%3e>> Subject:

Re: Any representitives from ip2location lurking

FWIW I've communicated with them via supp...@ip2location.com On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 12:33 PM Jim Bonnet via NANOG wrote: > Hello folks, > > Are there any folks from ip2location lurking on the list? Could you ping > me directly. We have a geofeed issue I'd like to ask about. > > Thank you. > Jim

Re: charging for config changess

On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 11:01 AM heasley wrote: > Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 02:17:12PM -0700, Randy Bush: > Many of those things could be automated via a customer portal. > Oh totally. Want to update your reverse DNS record? Just put in a credit card number and *bam* $250 charge to your card. ;)

Re: charging for config changess

On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 02:17:12PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > has charging for config changes a la > https://www.arelion.com/customer-excellence/customer-support/online-technical-change-pricing > become common while i was not looking? admittedly, i have not looked > for a long time.

Re: charging for config changess

From experience, I can imagine that Arelion has a very small subset of customers that are blowing up their tech support for changes like these constantly. I'm sure it's a punitive measure to deter these guys. Aaron On 30.06.2024 20:33, Tim Burke wrote: First I've heard of a provider doing

Re: charging for config changess

Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 02:17:12PM -0700, Randy Bush: > has charging for config changes a la > https://www.arelion.com/customer-excellence/customer-support/online-technical-change-pricing > become common while i was not looking? admittedly, i have not looked > for a long time. Many of those things

Re: Geolocation IP - www.firstinterstatebank.com

> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8805 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9092 will show you how to use 8805 randy

Re: Geolocation IP - www.firstinterstatebank.com

Yes, all ranges have geofeed. Regards, -- Jarek Kasjaniuk pon., 1 lip 2024 o 15:14 Christopher Hawker napisał(a): > > As trivial as this sounds, do you have a geofeed for your ranges set-up? > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8805 > > Regards, > Christopher Hawker > > Get Outlook for

Re: Geolocation IP - www.firstinterstatebank.com

As trivial as this sounds, do you have a geofeed for your ranges set-up? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8805 Regards, Christopher Hawker Get Outlook for Android From: NANOG on behalf of Jarek Kasjaniuk Sent: Monday, July 1,

Re: charging for config changess

AS7545 charge fees for changes. Even for trivial things such as updating RDNS records. CH Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> From: NANOG on behalf of Tim Burke Sent: Monday, July 1, 2024 11:33:46 AM To: Randy Bush Cc: NANOG Subje

Re: charging for config changess

First I’ve heard of a provider doing it… and we do business with 3356, the one carrier I’d expect to do something like this :-) Might just be me, but I rarely have to have config changes done on circuits after provisioning, short of enabling dual stack bgp on a circuit that didn’t have it

Re: Looking for DISA/DOD contact

I guess I could try that. My fear is that it would simply end up being read by the same people you get when you call the DISA helpdesk, and that they would see who it was from, tie it to a closed ticket where they already told me they couldn't help me because I wasn't military or a government

Re: Looking for DISA/DOD contact

Thank you. That is helpful. Mike On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 12:31 AM wrote: > The people at DISA you were dealing w/ aren't a Tier I service desk, > they're the service desk that lower service desks open tickets w/. > > Think of DISA as a Tier I ISP and the normal .mil user as a residential >

Re: Looking for DISA/DOD contact

The people at DISA you were dealing w/ aren't a Tier I service desk, they're the service desk that lower service desks open tickets w/. Think of DISA as a Tier I ISP and the normal .mil user as a residential user. See if one of your customers can put you in contact w/ their IT people (Usually a

Re: Looking for DISA/DOD contact

Thanks. That makes a little more sense to me. I know the questions DISA asked me when I called them, and I couldn't imagine just having the MIL-side email correspondent open a ticket directly with DISA. They would likely be more overwhelmed than I was. I'll talk to a couple of my customers

Re: Looking for DISA/DOD contact

One option is you said you have companies that do business with the DOD. Have one of them reach out to a contracting person about opening a ticket. That also allows there to be a claim that unblocking is mission essential vs someone trying to communicate with family. Normally the contracting

Re: Looking for DISA/DOD contact

Thanks again,Scott. I'll be patient! Mike Tindor On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 12:18 PM Scott Q. wrote: > All that sounds very familiar, I'm 100% sure it's the same issue. > > As I said, there are DISA folks here, they might reach out and give you > further steps. They did in my case, you just

Re: Looking for DISA/DOD contact

All that sounds very familiar, I'm 100% sure it's the same issue. As I said, there are DISA folks here, they might reach out and give you further steps. They did in my case, you just have to be more patient / on the ball than I was... Good luck! On Saturday, 29/06/2024 at 11:44 Mike Tindor

Re: Looking for DISA/DOD contact

Scott, Thanks for responding. Unfortunately, I think my situation is a little more dire, or at least involved. I probably should have said this before, but I had done TCP 25 outbound testing from our /23 to various .MIL MX's that I know were responding and could not establish a connection /

Re: Looking for DISA/DOD contact

There are DISA folks lurking here. I had a similar issue where our block was labeled as residential by their new firewall, and DISA front-desk isn't yet trained on this mechanism so they can't help. I escalated the issue to a lot of groups but in the end I gave up, too much bureaucracy. The

Re: Azure Looking Glass

I think we found the issue. Looks like a pmtu issue with our upstream provider and their connection to the microsoft fabric. Working with them now. Thank you everyone for helping. Some reached me off list to help. John On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 10:31 PM Lincoln Dale wrote: > Presumably

Re: Azure Looking Glass

Presumably nothing stops you spinning up an instance in Azure and doing pings/traceroutes yourself. But perhaps you could be doing this from your own IPs towards . Have you configured your end in a manner that doesn't do MTU 1500 or that relies on PMTUD to function? If yes, well perhaps start

Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs

Nokia you want the G6 XS-010XR-P line and the 230 enclosure UBNT also has XG and GPON PoE devices, you can dual power them from their USB + 24V passive - Their XGS unit does not do POE. I don’t recommend using the GPON SFP modules, the device they go in may not signal to you enough information

Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs

Calix just announced this today. GPR4001XH XGS pon with 4 poe ports. One 10G three 1G. https://eng2e.seismic.com/i/SKeXK2oT6LIeLYiJ9M34v3KmSECpxeMqY6LBELSMD5NrHbPHQMax6LgQq___VX3rmzgEL5I1STXPLUSSIGNGdM4fR3p15v670b1ZmzzJJPLjtUpPdMS8EQUALSIGN On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 9:31 AM Chris Hills wrote: >

Re: AS6762 Looking Glass Down

>> Seems that do not support IPv6 :-/ >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> >> Marcin Gondek / Drixter >> http://fido.e-utp.net/ >> AS56662 >> >> Od: NANOG w imieniu użytkownika >> Chris Welti via NAN

Re: AS6762 Looking Glass Down

; > Od: NANOG w imieniu użytkownika > Chris Welti via NANOG > Wysłane: środa, 26 czerwca 2024 06:58 > Do: Aaron Atac ; Nanog > Temat: Re: AS6762 Looking Glass Down > > Hi Aaron, > > have a look at https://www.tisparkle.com/looking-glass &

Re: AS6762 Looking Glass Down

Hi Aaron, have a look at https://www.tisparkle.com/looking-glass Cheers, Chris On 25.06.24 19:13, Aaron Atac via NANOG wrote: Hi, It seems the looking glass provided on peeringdb for AS6762 is down. Anyone on the list know if there's an alternative link or when it might be back up?

Re: interesting article on video encoding

On 6/22/24 23:15, Michael Thomas wrote: not exactly this list's main focus, but i suspect that lots of people here's day job is to move these bits around as fast as possible once they are being streamed.

Re: Looking for anycast DNS services..

; permanently remove any copies of this message from your system and do not > > retain any copies, whether in electronic or physical form or otherwise.  > > Thank You. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sean Barton > > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 6:47

Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs

On 19/06/2024 16:35, Brandon Martin wrote: I believe many of these were resolved with XGSPON, but you should consult your OLT vendor.  At minimum, expect to potentially into a situation where you cannot bulk upgrade the ONT firmware from the OLT over the OMCI but instead have to do it with L3

Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs

Am Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2024, 17:35:04 MESZ schrieb Brandon Martin: > On 6/19/24 09:30, Karsten Thomann via NANOG wrote: > > As the ONT should all be using OMCI, any reason not using Zhone ONT with > > another OLT Vendor to avoid the CLI issue? > > Or are they that special and don't work with other

Re: MA statewide 911 outage and resolved shortly afterwards?

Interestingly, I saw this post on social media showing some confusion across state lines. I believe this person lives around 100 miles from the nearest border of Maine. Note the first alert doesn’t specify which state is affected but the second does. Commenters on the post indicate they received

Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs

On 6/19/24 09:50, daveb wrote: You could try a GPON/XGSPON ONT SFP (SFU mode provisioning) in your favorite PoE switch/router. This is probably your best bet. I think basically everybody has a "ONT on a stick" in their catalog now for both XGSPON and GPON. Then provide your own switch that

Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs

On 6/19/24 09:30, Karsten Thomann via NANOG wrote: As the ONT should all be using OMCI, any reason not using Zhone ONT with another OLT Vendor to avoid the CLI issue? Or are they that special and don't work with other OLT? I know with GPON, there are some nuances in the OMCI that cause

Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs

You could try a GPON/XGSPON ONT SFP (SFU mode provisioning) in your favorite PoE switch/router. On 6/19/2024 5:55 AM, chiel via NANOG wrote: Hello, I'm looking for a for a vendor that has XGS-PON/GPON ONT's with PoE ports (preferable 4). Adtran and Calix don't seem any model that has

Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs

Calix GPR8802x is the only Calix XGSPON capable device that I know of with POE, but it's a full 1RU business oriented device and not really designed (or priced) for standard residential CPE. 380W total, up to 60W per port spread across 6x Gigabit ports, and 2x 2.5G ports Rest is a 10G WAN SFP+

Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs

Yes, Nokia has some ONTs with PoE, but are not really the requested size. I'm only aware about the U-090CP-P and the bigger U-00160CP-P, but they have 9 Ports or more... Not aware about any standard G- or XS- residential ONT with PoE.. I've never used the U series ONT, so no real life

RE: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs

I think Nokia has a few ONT's with POE Thank you Travis Garrison -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of chiel via NANOG Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 4:55 AM To: list Subject: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs Hello, I'm looking for a for a vendor that has XGS-PON/GPON ONT's

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >