Tony McCreath wrote:
I've just upgraded to .Net 2.0 and in the process converted my NAnt tasks.
However, NAnt (0.85) cannot read these tasks once compiled into .Net 2.0!
I am specifying -t:net-2.0
Have you tried changing the default framework in NAnt.exe.config?
Gary
Martin Aliger wrote:
Uhm. I'm not sure, I know what you are speaking about. You're refering to IM
(instant messaging) itself? The purpose of the miranda program is irrelevant
in my referal. I just like their web site layout, ideas and mainly addons
site. I think NAnt's task site should be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like this email list.
No, email is synchronous - you get to choose when to read email (except
when that's a job requirement). IM on the other hand is intended for
immediate response.
Gary
-
Gert Driesen wrote:
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Martin Aliger
Hello,
agreed - 1.0 soon is a good thing. I see only one big thing
which we should
addess in 1.0: VS2005 projects. Or MSBuild cooperation. The
same thing.
Since many developers are
Martin Aliger wrote:
This is another thing worth of implementation under 1.0.
I'd like something like Miranda-IM has. See http://www.miranda-im.org/ and
their Addons site.
That's a nice idea, but I can't imagine how to justify putting it into
1.0.
Besides, I've never been very fond of
Ramya Niranjan wrote:
In RC3 I see that there is not task to sort a directory for
subdirectories/files matching a search pattern (wildcard). I have
created
one such custom task and tested the same. This works fine. Please
let me
know if I could submit this code as a part of the
It's now been almost 6 weeks since rc4 came out.
There are three open bugs filed since then, none of which are
showstoppers in my opinion. There are two others closed and one deleted.
There are a couple of problems reporting in the mailing list since then,
some of which seem significant to
I just factored out a build file snippet into a separate target,
changing the if/if task containing the snippet to an if= attribute
on the new target. Much to my surprise, the include task within the
snippet stopped working.
Doing this triggered my memory, and sure enough the documentation
Martin Aliger wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for ftp and/or http put task. And as good as I look for
it, I don't see any! I believe there was some work on FTP task! I
check both NAnt's and NAntContrib's latest online documentaions and I
found only get task for getting the file. I need to upload
LievenQ wrote:
The problem is that visual studio doesn't have a system like
pkg-config. To solve this, I was thinking about creating a pkg-config
like system for visual studio myself. The package files would be
simple visual c++ 2005 proprety sheets, so that they are fully
supported with
There are currently no open P9 bugs. Only two bugs were submitted in
the first half of May, nine in all of April. Of the nine in April, two
were duplicates, one had already been fixed, one was user error, one has
been fixed, two are pending more information. I've marked one of them
postponed,
Gert Driesen wrote:
Gary, were you able to reproduce this issue ? It's working fine here.
I think that the issue described by the submitter is due to the way command
line arguments for batch files are processed, and as such this has nothing
to do with NAnt itself.
I didn't try, because
Ahmed, Shabana wrote:
I am not sure if this is how I get tot he verbose. But, I got the
latest nightly build and this is the error I get. I am still unable to
build the examples. Please let me know what u think. Thanks.
C:\work\nant\binnant.exe -verbose
Offhand, I'd say this is the wrong
Jay Flowers wrote:
I have been accumulating nAnt tasks, types, and functions for a
while. I had asked on the nAnt dev group if they would like to
include them but received no
Two points:
First, contributions like this should really be taken to the NAntContrib
developers mailing list.
Martin Aliger wrote:
Reasoning:
There are scenarios where you have to test, whether some element/attribute
is present in the xml. Its _not_ an error, if such element/attribute is
missing. Since xmlpeek task report it via exception, and even with
failonerror set it is considered error, blaming
Martin Aliger wrote:
Ah, you want to suppress standard logging too... Hmm - there is not an
attribute to do that. exec task always log all standard output as Info
level messages, and standard error as Warning level messages.
NAnt always write all messages up to level Info when run normally, up
Daniel Halan wrote:
I cant seem to find any info on how one could use ${xx} without it
tried to be replaced by a var.
Meaning I would want the ${xx} to be left alone...
Was checking the source code but it seems that there is no handling
for it (PropertyDictionary.cs, L:330).
A good
So I
Morris, Jason wrote:
Where did you get NCover from?
http://ncover.org/
- or -
http://ncover.sourceforge.net/
IIRC, I had this problem when I used the version from SourceForge, but
if you go to ncover.org, that version seems to work a lot better. Plus,
I found ncover.org's version
Troy Laurin wrote:
On 9/20/05, Gary Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but on the other hand there are some
things that make can do easily, but which are tricky or more work to do
in NAnt - such as adding a project-wide pre or post compile step.
That actually sounds like a good idea
Gert Driesen wrote:
...
- what should happen, if referenced fileset have another basedir ?
- what should happen, if exclude/include of 2 filesets conflicts ?
- is every possible combination of those covered in test cases?
For mine use, I dont combine basedirs and dont use excludes at all, but
Byrd, Payton wrote:
I have been encountering a problem in using NAnt that is not
necessarily a bug in NAnt, but just a real-world inconvenience brought
on by Word.
We create deployment documents in Word to describe deployment
instructions. Whenever we add a command line option such as -v
Kevin wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I just joined this list.
I’m working on a program that will spawn NAnt, and what I really want
to do is to be able to capture all of the output from all of the
executable programs that NAnt spawns. The reason why I want to do this
is because I want to provide
Troy Laurin wrote:
I have no issues with making the shell configurable, that's definitely
a Good Idea, although the actual nature of how to configure it would
probably need discussion. Would it be a normal (magical) property, or
a special parameter like the logger? Presumably it could be
Martin Aliger wrote:
(Regardless of what the decision is, the test cases need to
include all combinations of asis, include, exclude, fromdir,
relative basedir, absolute basedir, and omitted basedir.)
That would be really nice. Unfortunatelly possible combinations grow with
factorial - noone
Martin Aliger wrote:
Hi Gary,
as I implemented it, it converts scanned files from first fileset to full
path asis includes. So
fileset id=foo1 basedir=X:\nant\t1
include name=world.peace /
include name=world.war/
/fileset
fileset id=foo2
Marcin Hoppe wrote:
On 4/29/05, Shelly Midha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..
exec program=C:\[...]\SDK\v1.1\Bin\sn
arg value=-q /
arg value=-k /
arg value=${key.pair}.snk /
/exec
/target
/project
Values of arg tag's value parameter must not contain spaces, AFAIK.
I don't know
Troy Laurin wrote:
Just a pie-in-the-sky (whatever that means)...
These kind of issues aren't all that uncommon in builds... how
feasible is a meta-element attribute that can be nested under any
element and decorates it with an attribute. If the attribute
meta-element supported if/unless and
Troy Laurin wrote:
Marcin,
I don't have a link to good unit tests right now, but I do have some
suggestions that unit tests should follow...
Neither do I, but this happens to be an area in which I'm interested
(specifically I'm interested both in automating Subversion and in unit
testing), so
Troy Laurin wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:46:28 -0800, brant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason why we don't just use the existing Wiki as the Default
Home page; and build up the content from that?
I'm not so sure this is a good idea.
I think a wiki is an excellent collaboration
Gert Driesen wrote:
You have some very good points there, but I'm not sure that
CruiseControl is a very good example of a website... the left-hand
menu is good from a UI point of view... as you say, the link target
areas are large, and links and elements are all very obvious... but
the menu
From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 2:37 AM
I'm sorry I didn't get to this sooner, as I come down on the
hate side of hierarchical menus that Troy mentioned, at least
for home pages.
The problem is that hierarchical menus encourage large menus
with many entries.
From: Jamie Briant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 12:49 AM
The first is dangerous because when a programmer decides to change
some
build.config's to build.local.config (for example) they are
guaranteed
at some point to miss one. Not every time. Not even very often. Just
From: Castro, Edwin Gabriel (Firing Systems Engr.) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 1:53 PM
You know, I was just trying to do something similar to this... I was
writing a bash script to automate compilations of a few projects and
I
...
couldn't figure out how to mimic
From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 1:53 AM
But the xmlpeek task is definitely something different as a user expects
a
given property to be set to a value. If we don't output anything at a
all,
when no matching node is found then that property will not be set
From: Clayton Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 10:48 AM
Hi,
+1 for outputting the target framework
Gary, would the quiet (-q) switch solve the verbosity issue?
If you are looking for even less output there are other
commandline tools that also add another quiet
From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 2:04 PM
Hi,
I wonder if we should output the name of the target framework when
starting
a build, and perhaps also output it again whenever you change the target
framework
What do you think ?
NAnt's verbosity has
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 1:12 AM
If this is still true then I wonder how the parallel task in Ant works
around it.
Properties in Ant are always read-only, so there shouldn't be any issue
unless two parallel tasks attempt to create the same new
I've been following this dicussion from the sidelines, and one idea that has
occurred to me that may help, and should probably be addressed anyway, is
having Gump produce its own public/private key pair for signing strong names
for the assemblies. By using a separate key, you reduce the GAC
From: Alex Hildyard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 6:06 PM
Is it possible to repeat an arbitrary set of tasks with a user-defined exit
condition? If not, could I propose this as a new task?
Might I ask exactly what you're trying to accomplish with this? That might
help with
39 matches
Mail list logo
