Hey Gert,
Sorry about that, but in this age of spam moderating lists has become a
full-time job.
We cannot make a distinction between spam and posts from list members that
need to be approved, so we'd have to inspect each message individually.
This is not something any of us has enough timesl
Hey Martin,
I haven't had much time to review your patches yet, but here are a few
comments:
1) datetime_functions.patch
We now support overloaded functions, so I'd prefer this addition to be an
overload for to-string.
Problem is that we need to add support for overload in the doc generation.
I'
Hey Martin,
I added the missing file to NAnt.Win32.csproj.
I don't immediately see an advantage to converting our project file as long
as VS supports converting them to the version you're using.
Thanks,
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Martin Aliger [mailto:martin_ali...@gordic.cz]
Sent:
Hey Ryan,
Thanks for getting to the bottom of this.
Regardless of whether this'll fix the problem for Martin, we need to improve
our makefile to support other (mono) compilers beside mcs.
Can you add this to our roadmap ?
Thanks!
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmbo...@
Ryan,
The Mono team is dropping support for .NET Framework 1.x, hence mcs is no
longer available.
I believe Mono 2.6.x is the last release to support .NET 1.x.
We'll just need to check what version of Mono is available, or just check
for the compiler that is available (1.x: mcs, 2.x: gmcs, 4.x: d
think the
latter is more appropriate, as all files are available as child nodes.
Gert
From: Charles Chan [mailto:cchan...@users.sourceforge.net]
Sent: donderdag 1 april 2010 22:24
To: Richard Birkby; Gert Driesen
Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Bug tracker t
[nant-dev] sysinfo task
> Hi,
>
> On Mar 26, 2010, at 2:07 AM, Dominik Guder wrote:
>
>> Am 25.03.2010 17:12, schrieb Gert Driesen:
>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>
>>> I guess it won't make it in time for the 0.90 release.
>>> Personally, I even consider
Hey Dominik,
What version of NAnt are you running ?
I get a failure for the "foo(bar)" property:
Property name 'foo(bar)' is invalid.
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Dominik Guder [mailto:o...@guder.org]
Sent: vrijdag 26 maart 2010 22:37
To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
t: Re: [nant-dev] sysinfo task
Hi,
On Mar 26, 2010, at 2:07 AM, Dominik Guder wrote:
> Am 25.03.2010 17:12, schrieb Gert Driesen:
>> Hi Ryan,
>>
>> I guess it won't make it in time for the 0.90 release.
>> Personally, I even consider the sysinfo task deprecated.
>&
Hi Ryan,
I guess it won't make it in time for the 0.90 release.
Personally, I even consider the sysinfo task deprecated.
Gert
--
From: "Ryan Boggs"
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 5:03 PM
To: "Gert Driesen"
Cc: ; &qu
--
From: "Ryan Boggs"
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 4:45 PM
To: "Gert Driesen"
Cc: ; "Dominik Guder"
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] sysinfo task
> Hi,
>
> On Mar 25, 2010, at 8:10 AM, "Gert Driesen
Ryan,
We cannot allow parenthesis in property names, as that would screw up our
expression tokenizer.
I'm more enclined to a machanism that allows explicit control over the
property names that a given environment variable is mapped to.
Something similar to the file mappers in Ant would be great.
Ryan,
Problem is that you need consent from everyone that contributed code.
Note that I definitely don't have a problem with a more liberal license.
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: zaterdag 20 maart 2010 17:46
To: Gert Driesen
Cc:
Subjec
Hey Ryan,
Correct. There were plans once to change this, but it never happened (I'm
afraid).
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 16 maart 2010 2:53
To: gert.drie...@telenet.be; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: NAnt License
Hi,
Hey Charles,
Are you running the tests using the "test" target, or using the NUnit GUI ?
It's been a while since I ran the tests, but last time they were just fine.
Can you send me an example of this "mal-formatted" output ?
Gert
--
From: "Charles
Hi Ryan,
That would be great.
We could also look for an alternative in parallel (as NDoc is no longer
maintained).
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com]
Sent: zaterdag 6 maart 2010 2:09
To: Gert Driesen
Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Thanks dude!
-Original Message-
From: Charles Chan [mailto:cchan...@users.sourceforge.net]
Sent: zaterdag 6 maart 2010 4:25
To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [nant-dev] DocManager pages are now merged into MediaWiki
Big thanks to SF OPS -- the (old) documents have now be
me time (find the problem, fix it, and then
wait for the fix to be included in a release).
Regards,
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Charles Chan [mailto:cchan...@users.sourceforge.net]
Sent: vrijdag 5 maart 2010 4:26
To: Ryan Boggs
Cc: Gert Driesen; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sub
Hey Charles,
AFAIK this is a Mono issue. I get the same bad performance on Mono/Windows.
However, I'm sure our implementation can be optimized a lot.
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Charles Chan [mailto:cchan...@users.sourceforge.net]
Sent: donderdag 4 maart 2010 6:42
To: Ryan Boggs
Cc: n
Hey Charles,
I have no problem with dropping .NET 1.x as supported runtime, but I
definitely want to retain .NET 1.x as target framework.
There's no reason why we should drop support for that.
Regards,
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Charles Chan [mailto:cchan...@users.sourceforge.net]
Se
Hey Charles,
You should make it clear if you want to drop sypport for .NET 1.x as a
runtime environment (CLR), or as a target framework.
Regards,
Gert
--
From: "Charles Chan"
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 4:20 AM
To:
Subject: [nant-dev] Dro
urceforge.net]
Sent: dinsdag 16 februari 2010 21:35
To: Gert Driesen; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt status report [2010-02-14]
Gert,
A few more questions? Hope you don't mind ... :)
Charles
- Original Message
From: Gert Driesen
To: Charl
s ok if this is not high on your todo list, but you should keep it in
mind.
That way you don't introduce stuff that is not portable / cross-platform.
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Chan [mailto:cchan...@users.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: dinsdag 16 februari 201
Hey Charles,
That function - which I consider to be internal - may indeed not be part of
any official release.
So in this case, you can only build NAnt with:
* a "nightly" build (which hasn't been uploaded in quite a while due to
scp/rsync issues with sourceforge)
* a bootstrap of NAnt (though mak
Hey Charles,
It's great to have new blood joining the NAnt team, but may I ask which
project admin you contacted to become member ?
Regards,
Gert
--
From: "Charles Chan"
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 4:23 AM
To:
Subject: [nant-dev] [INTRO] S
Hi Rasmus,
Feel free to post patches to the developer mailing list.
For isolated changes, you can even send me the modified source(s).
Great to have you on board!
Gert
From: Rasmus Jelsgaard [mailto:ras...@jelsgaard.com]
Sent: dinsdag 8 september 2009 20:24
To: nant-developers@lis
roject when it still
hasn't reached 1.0! At the moment anyone checking the project page
would think this project was dead and that MSBuild has won; that's a
real shame because NAnt is awesome and I still think it's the better
build solution.
--
Bruce
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:00:16 -07
Hi Leszek,
I agree that a new version should be released.
I would first like to release a new beta/release candidate though.
Now only to find time ... :(
Gert
--
From: "Leszek Ciesielski"
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 10:58 AM
To:
Subject: [nant-d
Hi Manjusha,
No, this is not something we currently support in the task.
Gert
From: Lokhande, Manjusha
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 6:44 AM
To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [nant-dev] PostBuildEvent
Hi,
I have a PostBuildEvent defined in my .csproj file.
But I do n
Hi Steve,
I've added support for Windows SDK 6.1 to CVS.
I don't think we explicitly need to check the Wow6432Node registry keys.
I tried to run NAnt both compiled targeting .NET 1.0 (which means it will
run in WOW64) and .NET 2.0 on Vista x64, and had no problems.
I'll try to get a new nightly
Hey Andrew,
Most of the initialization is started here:
void Initialize(XmlNode elementNode, PropertyDictionary properties,
FrameworkInfo framework)
in NAnt.Core.Element
I'd suggest debugging NAnt running a simple project if you want to learn
more.
If you have any specific questions, I'll be gl
Hey Shovavnik,
The (n)make method is used for bootstrapping NAnt; meaning, building a
minimal version NAnt -without relying on NAnt itself - that can be used to
build the full version of NAnt.
That full version is actually built using the NAnt.build file. That build
file is used to build bo
Hey Robin,
Currently, the exec task will log all output that the external process
writes to stderr as warnings. I don't think we should consider all output to
stderr as actual errors.
I'd suggest fixing your buildhelper to return a non-zero exit code when
execution fails.
Gert
From:
Mark,
We ship with #ziplib v0.85.1.271, but the directory in which it's stored
changed since earlier versions of NAnt.
You probably extract the lastest version of NAnt into a directory containing
an older version.
Gert
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Eric,
We do not yet support .NET Framework 3.5 for the task.
In order to support both .NET 2.0 and 3.5, we need to use reflection for the
MSBuild assemblies and we have problems loading the 3.5 version of the
MSBuild assemblies.
I don't recall the exact details, but I'll contact the develope
Eric,
Can you send me a small repro for this issue?
Thanks!
Gert
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
Fetzer
Sent: woensdag 16 april 2008 23:47
To: NAnt Developers
Subject: [nant-dev] Upgrade to latest nightly build
I upgraded to try out the 3.5 st
Eric,
For .NET, we now use an explicit set of assemblies that we can automatically
resolve to a full path.
This set can be configured in the NAnt.exe.config file.
I have now added the System.Data.OracleClient assembly.
You can double-check the configuration file to make sure our list is
complet
Paul,
You'll need to use the bootstrap version of NAnt to build NAnt 0.86.
To create the bootstrap version:
(linux / cygwin)
$ make bootstrap
or
(windows)
$ nmake -f Makefile.nmake bootstrap
Hope this helps,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesda
The first beta for NAnt 0.86 is available NOW !
This release focuses on extending our already strong support for multiple
target frameworks, bringing improved flexibility and performance.
As of this release, our framework support chart looks like this:
Framework Target
Hi Dries,
There's no real reason why ResourceFileSet is sealed, so I'll change that.
Gert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dries
Samyn
Sent: woensdag 28 november 2007 22:42
To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Mark Reid
Subject:
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 16 november 2007 16:44
To: Gert Driesen; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] Strict execution of managed applications
Hi,
Cool! Thanks a lot - I'll give it a shot on our Spring.NET codebase asap.
keep up the great
Hi,
Today, I've finally introduced support for running a Managed application on
a specific version of a CLR.
We've been supporting running an application on a given CLR for quite a
while now, but we did not provide direct support for forcing an application
to run on a specific CLR version.
Me
Chris,
I'm not sure this is something we should "fix".
If we do this, then we should do it for both onsuccess and onfailure. We
then risk hiding the original build outcome.
Gert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Lambrou
Sent: maanda
Hi,
I've decided to spend some more time on NAnt. Initial results of that work
are available in today's nightly build.
Some of the more visible changes since the 0.85 release are:
Framework support
* Added support for targeting .NET Framework 3.5
* Experimental support for targeting Silverlig
Jason,
NAnt developent has not ceased, but I haven't spend much time on it later
(except from bug fixes).
Release notes that list some of the changes since the 0.85 release:
http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/latest/releasenotes.html
New contributors are always welcome :-)
Gert
_
Alex,
Pick the area you're most interested in. What experience do you have ?
Gert
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex
Rovner
Sent: maandag 9 april 2007 16:47
To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [nant-dev] Nant Contributions
I would lik
tinuation of a thread on general@gump.apache.org: http://
> mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/gump-general/200702.mbox/%
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> On Feb 17, 2007, at 12:43 AM, Gert Driesen wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Curt Ar
Hi Jay (or anyone else with an opinion on this),
Few small questions:
I'm adding a first version of a task to NAntContrib (which can
be used in combination with spawned processes), and wondered if that task
should fail if the process you're waiting for exits with a non-success exit
code (!= 0)
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Aliger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: donderdag 21 december 2006 16:36
> To: 'Abhilash Panickar'; 'Gert Driesen'
> Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Building VS2005 projects
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nant-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony McCreath
> Sent: donderdag 9 november 2006 0:42
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [nant-dev] .Net 2.0 Task dlls
>
> I've just upgraded to .Net 2.0 and in the process co
Paul,
The task uses the NUnit API to run the tests. As a result, the unit
tests are executed in the CLR that is hosting NAnt.
I will soon add an task that will run the nunit-console.exe
that corresponds with the target framework.
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma
nathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Martin Aliger'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] aspnet_compiler task
Gert,
I currently have one task i wrote for .NET 2.0, t
Hi Martin, Ram,
Nothing prevents us from having a separate NAnt.Contrib assembly
for 2.0 specific extensions (tasks, functions, filters, …).
We could also conditionally build these extension when NantContrib
is built targeting .NET 2.0, but then the official binary distribution woul
Announcing NAnt 0.85.
Binary and source distributions are available for immediate download from:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=31650
About NAnt:
NAnt is a free .NET build tool, allowing applications to be built targeting
both Microsoft .NET and Mono while supporting both W
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Baxter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Csc Task Ignoring References
> So is it that the csc compiler will ignore a /refe
Ryan,
In that case, csc cannot locate the referenced assemblies.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Baxter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 5:57 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] Csc Task Ignoring References
>I have a build script that looks something like the followi
No, this will only be supported after the 0.85 release. We do
support.NET 2.0, but not (yet) VS 2005 solutions and project.
Gert
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramprakash
Gopinathan
Sent: woensdag 11 oktober 2006 18:33
To: nant-developers@lists.
Amish,
Do you have a self-contained repro you can share for this issue ?
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "amish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 9:19 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] Problem in add reference of the other project
in
> Hi
> I am new to NANT.
> I have tw
John,
This appears to be due to some change in .NET 2.0 wrt to the assembly
loader.
I'll commit a workaround to cvs in a minute.
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nant-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Cole
> Sent: woensdag 13 september 2006 17:24
> To: na
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nant-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Toby Johnson
> Sent: vrijdag 18 augustus 2006 16:24
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [nant-dev] Upgrade ziplib to 0.84?
>
> Are there any plans to upgrade to the latest zip
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'mike61079'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] VSWebCache ObjectDir
>> I have the same setup as you, everything is in distinct
>> directories and then it ends up sh
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Gert Driesen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'mike61079'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] VSWebCache
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Gert Driesen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'mike61079'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 11:16 AM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] VSWebCache O
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'mike61079'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
; "'Gert Driesen'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] VSWebC
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nant-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mike61079
> Sent: maandag 31 juli 2006 22:13
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] VSWebCache ObjectDir
>
>
> Actually this just happened to me. I compiled the
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Martin Aliger
> Sent: vrijdag 28 juli 2006 17:02
> To: 'Andrew Davey'; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Continuing work on
>
> Andy,
>
> its quite a time since th
Martin,
We needed this to mimic the behavior of Visual Studio for web projects.
Visual Studio first writes the compiler output to that directory, and as
such the path specified in AssemblyKeyFile is resolved relative to that
directory.
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Martin Aliger
> Sent: vrijdag 14 juli 2006 12:59
> To: 'Gary Feldman'; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Release 0.85 and beyond
>
> Hello,
>
> agreed - 1.0 soon is
it tests to run on the active target
framework.
eg. even when running NAnt on MS.NET 2.0, we'd be
able to support running unit tests on MS.NET 1.0.
This can ofcourse not be achieved when using the
NUNit API.
Gert
- Original Message -
From:
Shmarya Rubenstein
To
cvs ? If the patch checks out fine, I'll either commit it myself or
give you permissions to commit it yourself.
Are you familiar with cvs ?
Gert
- Original Message -
From:
Shmarya Rubenstein
To: Gert Driesen
Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tu
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Flex
> Sent: maandag 3 juli 2006 11:10
> To: Gert Driesen; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Flex
> Sent: donderdag 29 juni 2006 11:50
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?
>
> Guys, I'm completely newbie both to nant
Announcing NAnt 0.85 Release Candidate 4.
Binary and source distributions are available for immediate download from:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=31650
About NAnt: NAnt is a free .NET build tool, allowing applications to be
built targeting both Microsoft .NET and Mono wh
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Gary Feldman
> Sent: dinsdag 16 mei 2006 17:32
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [nant-dev] Bug tracking status
>
> There are currently no open P9 bugs. Only two bugs were s
> -Original Message-
> From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: zondag 23 april 2006 11:14
> To: 'Trevor Misfeldt'; 'nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Internal error: illegal characters in
> exec ca
Sanjiv,
There have been reports of similar issues in the past, and these were always
caused by a bad install of the .NET Framework.
Can you trying reinstalling the .NET Framework 1.1 redistributable?
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Trevor Misfeldt
> Sent: maandag 27 maart 2006 6:01
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [nant-dev] Internal error: illegal characters in exec call
>
>
> I got this error with t
Righardt,
This is now fixed in cvs, and the fix will be part of the next nightly build
or release.
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Marais Righardt
> Sent: woensdag 12 april 2006 11:09
> To: 'nant-developers@lists.sourcefor
Michael,
This is now fixed in cvs, and will be part of the next nightly build or
release.
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Michael George
> Sent: dinsdag 11 april 2006 21:30
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sub
Harmon,
Expansion of environment variables in path should not be part done in
FileUtils, as this is not something that should to be done for all paths.
The modifications should be limited to the task's support for C++
(meaning src\NAnt.VSNet\Vc*.cs).
Can you also make that patch against NAnt cv
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ahmed, Shabana
> Sent: vrijdag 21 april 2006 18:31
> To: Gert Driesen; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [nant-dev] The system cannot find the path specifi
Ahmed,
Please provide a verbose build log (NAnt.exe -verbose).
Also, I suggest upgrading to a recent nightly build
(http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/latest).
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ahmed, Shabana
> Sent: vrijda
Hi Christian,
I've fixed the dynamic assembly issue locally, and commit it to cvs in a few
minutes.
I'll let you know when I've finished uploading a new nightly build for you
to test.
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Chris
> - Original Message -
> From: "Crawford, Christina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 8:24 PM
> Subject: [nant-dev] New service task action types
>
> Request new action types to the Nant servicecontroller task:
>
> Uninstall a service
> Install a service
Not
Hi Michael,
Do you have a small repro you can share ?
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Michael O'Brien
> Sent: dinsdag 14 maart 2006 16:19
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [nant-dev] Custom tasks from
Hi John,
I'm gonna update NAnt to use NUnit 2.2.7 first, and see if there are any
critital issues that need to be fixed first.
I'll try to ship a new release candidate this or next week.
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Joh
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Martin Aliger
> Sent: dinsdag 7 februari 2006 10:33
> To: 'Gert Driesen'; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [nant-dev] resgen speed
>
> G
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Martin Aliger
> Sent: dinsdag 7 februari 2006 8:03
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [nant-dev] resgen speed
>
> Gert,
>
> you wrote (in response to one issue report):
>
>
Jeremy,
You ran into a known issue for NAnt 0.85 RC3, which was fixed since.
Try using a recent nightly build
(http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/latest).
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jeremy Veeder
> Sent: maandag 30
Jayakumar,
Usage of WebDAV for deployment is actually deprecated, but you could try
using a more recent version of NAnt
(http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/latest).
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Gnanadesikan Jayakumar
>
Mohammed,
I ran into this issue myself once, but I could not reproduce it later on.
Can you consistently reproduce this issue ?
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Farooq Mohammed
> Sent: donderdag 5 januari 2006 18:39
> To: n
Rick,
The task currently does not support .NET 2.0 solutions or
projects.
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Rick Garibay
> Sent: dinsdag 24 januari 2006 22:31
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [nant-dev]
Arun,
Are you sure you've "installed" NAnt correctly ?
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of arun kumar
> Sent: zaterdag 14 januari 2006 10:58
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [nant-dev] Please give me the
Martin,
Overloading of functions is not (yet) supported. I'm definitely in favor of
this, but if I recall correctly Ian and Jarek ruled against this in favor of
implicit conversion of function arguments. Ian, please correct me if I'm
wrong.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Aliger"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Martin Aliger
> Sent: vrijdag 30 december 2005 15:25
> To: ! nant
> Subject: [nant-dev] VS 2005 project support (via MSBuild)
>
> I was thinking about Reflection too. Have to try it.
>
> But - m
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, December 9, 2005 06:39 PM
>To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: [nant-dev] Question about nunit-gui
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm unittesting an application that uses Firebird. In every test I shutdo
>-Original Message-
>From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, December 9, 2005 09:06 AM
>To: 'Martin Aliger'
>Cc: ''Gert Driesen'', ''Gert Driesen'', ''! nant''
>Subject: Re: [nant-de
has stabilized ? This is our policy for all new
tasks.
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Martin Aliger
> Sent: dinsdag 6 december 2005 21:15
> To: 'Ian MacLean'; 'Gert Driesen'
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of chellu pradeep
> Sent: dinsdag 6 december 2005 23:24
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [nant-dev] NAnt Error
>
> INTERNAL ERROR
>
> System.MissingMethodException: Method no
Brian,
Can you send me a small repro for this issue ?
Thanks !
Gert
>-Original Message-
>From: Rassier, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 10:53 PM
>To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: [nant-dev] Bug Report
>
>My last NAnt failure asked to s
1 - 100 of 975 matches
Mail list logo
