Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-20 Thread Jeanette Russo
jeanette russo wrote: From: "jeanette russo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fw: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 05:25:35 PDT From: "Jeanette Russo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [[newbie] Linux for home consumers?]

1999-08-18 Thread Rick Fry
What does it take to write a video card driver that some hotshot unix guru programmer can't come up with? If they can talk the talk, how about trying to walk the walk? I keep hearing about what geniuses inhabit the Unix crowd, how about putting up or shutting up? Original Message

Re: [[newbie] Linux for home consumers?]

1999-08-18 Thread Theo Brinkman
Device specs would be nice. But Diamond doesn't release THEM either. Without documentation writing drivers is a tediously painful process of guesswork. Yes, geniuses inhabit the *nix crowd, but they're only geniuses, not psychics or gods. - Theo Rick Fry wrote: What does it take

Re: [[newbie] Linux for home consumers?]

1999-08-18 Thread John Aldrich
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, you wrote: What does it take to write a video card driver that some hotshot unix guru programmer can't come up with? If they can talk the talk, how about trying to walk the walk? I keep hearing about what geniuses inhabit the Unix crowd, how about putting up or

RE: [[newbie] Linux for home consumers?]

1999-08-18 Thread Ken Wilson
] Subject: Re: [[newbie] Linux for home consumers?] What does it take to write a video card driver that some hotshot unix guru programmer can't come up with? If they can talk the talk, how about trying to walk the walk? I keep hearing about what geniuses inhabit the Unix crowd, how

Re: [[newbie] Linux for home consumers?]

1999-08-18 Thread Steve Philp
Rick Fry wrote: What does it take to write a video card driver that some hotshot unix guru programmer can't come up with? If they can talk the talk, how about trying to walk the walk? I keep hearing about what geniuses inhabit the Unix crowd, how about putting up or shutting up? That's

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-17 Thread Ripcrd6
At www.thelinuxstore.com they are now taking orders for the PIA a Personal Internet Appliance. It comes preconfigured w/ Red Hat, and is fully functional as a linux box. All for only $199. Brian -Original Message- From: Dan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Richard Salts [EMAIL

Re: [[newbie] Linux for home consumers?]

1999-08-17 Thread Thomas J. Hamman
On 16-Aug-99 Rick Fry wrote: It's not the card. It's the monitor. The card is a Diamond A50. The monitor is a Pixie 770 which is a 17" monitor that both of my Windows run at 1280x1024 with 24 bit color. According to the monitor specs, it uses scan frequencies between 30-86Hz Horizontal and

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread kelvin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On this topic i agree with both Dan Brown and Aaron deRozario. Aaron has a point in that Linux is not difficult to learn or has a steep learning curve. It is just that users find it difficult 'cos they still have the Windows mindset. Example...I

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Richard Salts wrote: Somebody was saying to me that he believed Linux was a good corporate tool but not a good op system for home use because of it's steep learning curve. I disagree. Linux is more powerful, not more difficult, than Windows. If people are telling you

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread Stephan Rex
ady beaten Microsoft for the most superior OS. These are my thoughts only and do not represent anyone else. Stephan Rex - Original Message - From: Richard Salts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 3:16 PM Subject: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

Re: [[newbie] Linux for home consumers?]

1999-08-16 Thread Michael Scottaline
Richard Salts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Somebody was saying to me that he believed Linux was a good corporate tool but not a good op system for home use because of it's steep learning curve. What do the list subscribers here think? Think Linux-Mandrake isn't ready for Prime Time yet? I wonder.

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread Jeanette Russo
still doing a lot. Most people are not going to be willing to put the time into it that I have. Jeanette - Original Message - From: Richard Salts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 12:16 AM Subject: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Somebody

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread Jeanette Russo
] Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 4:31 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Richard Salts wrote: Somebody was saying to me that he believed Linux was a good corporate tool but not a good op system for home use because of it's steep learning curve. I disagree

Re: [[newbie] Linux for home consumers?]

1999-08-16 Thread Rick Fry
Cute. I'm running Mandrake 6.0 with crummy graphics, Windows 98 second edition and Windows 2000 release candidate 1 with 1280 by 1024 by 24 bit graphics and I haven't seen a bsod in months. I'm running on a celeron 400 with 128M of ram and 20G of disk space. Haven't frozen up or crashed in

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread Martin White
- Original Message - From: Stephan Rex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 11:16 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Hi Richard, I am a linux newbie, but have been in IT for 5 years no and from that back ground I would say Linux

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread chris
If by "home user" he means "the average user", then he's absolutely right (just scanning this list proves that). I'm sure there are people who happen to be using Linux at home, but tha's not really the point. If Linux was ready for the "home user", they'd already be using it. At 12:16 AM

Re: [[newbie] Linux for home consumers?]

1999-08-16 Thread John Connell
Rick Fry wrote: Original Message Follows I've only been using linux since May and it's now just about all I use at home. It's as easy to use as windows. In fact, I foret I'm not in windows, except no BSOD ;o)

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Jeanette Russo wrote: The problem is if you look at this list a lot of people start I just bought Linux Mandrake 6.0 and can't get it installed. So I think the install still needs work. This is currently being done. 6.1 will have a completely different installer. Red Hat

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If by "home user" he means "the average user", then he's absolutely right (just scanning this list proves that). Not quite. Follow some Windows mailing lists and you'll see people have quite some trouble getting that to work, also. Most of the

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread Richard Salts
Hello and thanks for your response. So installers are being worked on for both Mandrake and Red Hat? Very good. For what this is worth for anyone, I used the Workstation to install my copy of Red Hat 6.0 and it worked beautifully well. RH 6.0 is still on my D: drive and it works all right as

RE: [[newbie] Linux for home consumers?]

1999-08-16 Thread Joseph Gardner
oblem ( and we won't even charge you the M$ standard of $150 / hr - 1 hr min) G Regards, You're average Joe. Joseph Gardner -Original Message- From: Rick Fry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 7:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [[newbie] Linu

Re: [[newbie] Linux for home consumers?]

1999-08-16 Thread Jayce Steadman
Rick Fry wrote: Cute. I'm running Mandrake 6.0 with crummy graphics, Windows 98 second edition and Windows 2000 release candidate 1 with 1280 by 1024 by 24 bit graphics and I haven't seen a bsod in months. I'm running on a celeron 400 with 128M of ram and 20G of disk space. Haven't frozen

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread Dan Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No they aren't. Do you know any people who don't know anything about computers, who don't WANT to know anything about computers, who just want to surf, get email, and do processing, who run Linux? I don't. And if you I don't know any who do, but they _could_

RE: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread Thomas J. Hamman
On 16-Aug-99 Richard Salts wrote: Somebody was saying to me that he believed Linux was a good corporate tool but not a good op system for home use because of it's steep learning curve. What do the list subscribers here think? Think Linux-Mandrake isn't ready for Prime Time yet? I

RE: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread RICHARD FRIEDMAN
ick Rick Friedman Salant Corp. - MIS 800-472-8013 x75105 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Richard Salts [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 1:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [newbie] Lin

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread Andy Goth
I am a home user The only really big problem with the home user and linux is advertisement... remember "Where do you want to go today?" The first time you saw it was probably on tv. When was the last time you have seen a linux commercial? I never have... Linux doesn't get the

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread Guillermo Belli
I'm a home user.. I use Mandrake for everything: school work, web surfing, image manipulation, email, ICQ, IRC... nothing better tha a stable platform as linux. El dom, 15 ago 1999, escribiste: Somebody was saying to me that he believed Linux was a good corporate tool but not a good op

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-16 Thread Guillermo Belli
would get on hardware makers cases about drivers and easy of use This is only my opinion... But i feel linux is the next generation of mass os evolution. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 5:55 AM Subject: Re: [new

[newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-15 Thread Richard Salts
Somebody was saying to me that he believed Linux was a good corporate tool but not a good op system for home use because of it's steep learning curve. What do the list subscribers here think? Think Linux-Mandrake isn't ready for Prime Time yet? I wonder. Are there any home users on this list?

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-15 Thread Dan Brown
From: Richard Salts [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wonder. Are there any home users on this list? I'm a home user. I'm also a tech support rep for a major ISP. There's no way I'd recommend Linux to the majority of the people with whom I deal daily. For the most part, it's not a matter of

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-15 Thread Murray Strome
I am also a home user, although I am having a few problems, especially with my sound card (Acer FX-3D -- AD1816 which is supposed to be supported, but can't get it to work) and my mouse (don't think my Matsonic 3 button mouse on COM 1, configured as Generic 3 button mouse with 3 button

Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-15 Thread pete moss
i am a music composition and electronic music grad student. i got into linux because of the stereotypical MS windows hatred. i think it is great, but i wouldnt recommend it to the average joe. i worked for flashnet tech support for a while, and i definately wouldnt recommend it to most of the

RE: [newbie] Linux for home consumers?

1999-08-15 Thread Aaron deRozario
. -Original Message- From: Richard Salts [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 16 August 1999 13:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Somebody was saying to me that he believed Linux was a good corporate tool but not a good op system for home