Hi All
I have been getting a load of mail with docs attached such as:
xx.pif
It is prompting me to consider some spam filter like spamassassin but i have
no idea where to start
any suggestions?
Martin
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 Jan 2005 08:47, Martin Hardie wrote:
Hi All
I have been getting a load of mail with docs attached such as:
xx.pif
It is prompting me to consider some spam filter like spamassassin but i
have no idea where to start
any
From: Martin Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All
I have been getting a load of mail with docs attached such as:
xx.pif
It is prompting me to consider some spam filter like spamassassin but i
have
no idea where to start
any suggestions?
Martin, for that kind of spam you need to consider a
From: Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 04 Jan 2005 08:47, Martin Hardie wrote:
Hi All
I have been getting a load of mail with docs attached such as:
xx.pif
It is prompting me to consider some spam filter like spamassassin but i
have no idea where to start
any suggestions?
-Original Message-
From: Erylon Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 1:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Spam assassin with Thunderbird
On Friday 03 December 2004 05:44 am, Todd Slater
wrote:
| On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 04:12:39AM -0800
Anyone?? Or is this rocket science?
-Original Message-
From: Tango Echo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:37 PM
To: newb-mdk
Subject: [newbie] Spam assassin with Thunderbird
How easy is to setup Spam assassin for Thunderbird?
I'm runnning 10.0 and have
-
From: Tango Echo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:37 PM
To: newb-mdk
Subject: [newbie] Spam assassin with Thunderbird
How easy is to setup Spam assassin for Thunderbird?
I'm runnning 10.0 and have found that the spam
abilities in thunderbird are far from
, 2004 4:37 PM
| To: newb-mdk
| Subject: [newbie] Spam assassin with Thunderbird
|
|
| How easy is to setup Spam assassin for Thunderbird?
| I'm runnning 10.0 and have found that the spam
| abilities in thunderbird are far from sufficient... Is
| it easy enough for someone to supply the steps
How easy is to setup Spam assassin for Thunderbird?
I'm runnning 10.0 and have found that the spam
abilities in thunderbird are far from sufficient... Is
it easy enough for someone to supply the steps or can
you point me to a good doc for (a quick) setup?
Thanks!
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 22:27, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 10:32 am, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
whack
My spam load is very low: Ham=4105 Spam=981 about 24%.
Hoyt:
I wouldn't call 24% low -- my personal scream and yell threshold is
about 15%, and I'm running comfortably below
On Sunday 25 July 2004 14:14, Erylon Hines wrote:
On Saturday 24 July 2004 04:04 am, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
| I need to install filters but have forgotten how they should be set
| up and at the moment I cant find my notes. I have trained
| spamassassin with enough email (spam ham) so they should
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 10:32 am, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
whack
My spam load is very low: Ham=4105 Spam=981 about 24%.
Hoyt:
I wouldn't call 24% low -- my personal scream and yell threshold is about 15%,
and I'm running comfortably below that at present. My ISP runs a reasonably
effective spam
On Friday 23 Jul 2004 20:02, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 18:25, SME Server Admin wrote:
Hiya
I now use Kontact on Mandrake 10 for all email.
At the moment I have a simple spam filter that I put in but I'm looking
for something I can use that will handle it for me, one
On Monday 26 Jul 2004 05:22, Rob Blomquist wrote:
FN? FP? auto-learn 0? local.cf?
I have no idea what these are. If you help me decode this, maybe I can
figure out what you are asking.
Rob
Ahh, a man with more understanding of these things than I ;)
At the moment I'm building up a
On Sunday 25 July 2004 11:22 pm, Rob Blomquist wrote:
Rob, do you check your inbox and spam folder for FN's and FP's before
running your script? I take it you have auto-learn 0 in your local.cf?
FN? FP? auto-learn 0? local.cf?
I have no idea what these are. If you help me decode this,
Rob, do you check your inbox and spam folder for FN's and FP's before
running your script? I take it you have auto-learn 0 in your local.cf?
FN? FP? auto-learn 0? local.cf?
I have no idea what these are. If you help me decode this, maybe I can
figure out what you are asking.
On Saturday 24 July 2004 04:04 am, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
|
| I need to install filters but have forgotten how they should be set up
| and at the moment I cant find my notes. I have trained spamassassin
| with enough email (spam ham) so they should be useful but cant get it
| to function.
Are you
On Sunday 25 July 2004 6:26 pm, SME Server Admin wrote:
Well. I've installed Spam Assassin via the instructions, however since
setting it up my inbound spam has dropped considerably :( Drat. No, really,
I wanted to sort out the rules... Anyway, it's monday tomorrow and
everything is busy in
On Sunday 25 July 2004 09:54 pm, Rob Blomquist wrote:
Now, I have a little script that runs spam-learn on my inbox, SpamPile
and a few others daily. Mine runs from KAlarm.
Now, get and setup my_rules_du_Jour and rules_du_jour. You can get it
from the Exit0 SA Wiki Page at
On Sunday 25 July 2004 8:05 pm, Chris wrote:
On Sunday 25 July 2004 09:54 pm, Rob Blomquist wrote:
Now, I have a little script that runs spam-learn on my inbox, SpamPile
and a few others daily. Mine runs from KAlarm.
Now, get and setup my_rules_du_Jour and rules_du_jour. You can get it
On Saturday 24 July 2004 00:42, Erylon Hines wrote:
On Friday 23 July 2004 10:04 am, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
| On Friday 23 July 2004 10:13, Erylon Hines wrote:
| On Friday 23 July 2004 01:25 am, SME Server Admin wrote:
snip
http://www.jennings.homelinux.net/mailserver_config.html
I'm not doing
On Friday 23 July 2004 01:25 am, SME Server Admin wrote:
| Hiya
|
| I now use Kontact on Mandrake 10 for all email.
|
| At the moment I have a simple spam filter that I put in but I'm looking for
| something I can use that will handle it for me, one that can learn if
| that's possible?
|
| TIA
|
|
On Friday 23 Jul 2004 16:13, Erylon Hines wrote:
On Friday 23 July 2004 01:25 am, SME Server Admin wrote:
| Hiya
|
| I now use Kontact on Mandrake 10 for all email.
|
| At the moment I have a simple spam filter that I put in but I'm looking
| for something I can use that will handle it for
On Friday 23 July 2004 10:13, Erylon Hines wrote:
On Friday 23 July 2004 01:25 am, SME Server Admin wrote:
| Hiya
|
| I now use Kontact on Mandrake 10 for all email.
|
| At the moment I have a simple spam filter that I put in but I'm
| looking for something I can use that will handle it for
On Friday 23 Jul 2004 18:04, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
http://www.jennings.homelinux.net/modules.php?name=Sectionsop=viewar
ticleartid=15
http://www.ee.columbia.edu/systems/spam.html
snip
These two refrences do not resolve on the server.
The Columbia Link has gone, but the other is there
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 18:25, SME Server Admin wrote:
Hiya
I now use Kontact on Mandrake 10 for all email.
At the moment I have a simple spam filter that I put in but I'm looking for
something I can use that will handle it for me, one that can learn if that's
possible?
TIA
Elwyn
On Friday 23 July 2004 10:04 am, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
| On Friday 23 July 2004 10:13, Erylon Hines wrote:
| On Friday 23 July 2004 01:25 am, SME Server Admin wrote:
| | Hiya
| |
| | I now use Kontact on Mandrake 10 for all email.
| |
| | At the moment I have a simple spam filter that I put in
Hi Guys
I have been dabbling with mailfilter and spamassassin. Spamassassin filters a
few spam messages received and I have managed to get filters sorted out with
KMail to send the SPAM* messages to a spam folder.
Trying out maililter the logs show that the messages on the pop3 server
I downloaded spamassassin-2.31-2mdk.src.rpm and attempted to rebuild:-
# cd /pk
# rpm --rebuild spamassassin-2.31-2mdk.src.rpm
Installing spamassassin-2.31-2mdk.src.rpm
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6485
big snip
Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e
John I assume you got this off cooker?
I do not know what is wrong with your rebuild, but spamassassin-2.31-1mdk.rpm
is on Mandrake Club for 8.2 and it installs perfectly.
If you are not a club member let me know and I will send you the rpm as an
attachment.
BTW: In order for spamassassin to
Mark I am sending you this direct with a copy to newbie,as my newbie
messages
on this subject do no seem to be getting through, and I wanted to thank you.
First let me correct myself , you are quite right both postfix and
procmail are on
mandrake, I just didn't know that they were commandline
SystemAdmin ABC Mini Storage LLC wrote:
Yes indeed. The best I've come so far is reporting
the spam to
spamcop.net (including the one I recently received
from Microsoft, heh heh).
Sir Robin
--
Try the newsgroups at www.grc.com
gr.spam and grc.spam.news
a newsgroup project
SPAM
We all get it, but is there a good way of dealing with it.
Seems to me I would like to be able to set something up in mozilla
to send spam to, which either redirects it back to them, or zaps it.
Is there anyway of doing this.
John
--
John Richard Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want to
Miark wrote:
John,
Seems to me I would like to be able to set something up in mozilla
to send spam to, which either redirects it back to them, or zaps it.
Can't send it back cuz you never know where it really came from. But
you can set up a filter to set aside spam in a suspect
* shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] [21 Mar 02 17:10]:
also they should not include any known address of john the mandrake list
spammer.
A practical question (I hope!) on spam control:
Can procmail handle more than one address in a recipe?
e.g.
:0
* ^From.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* ^From.*[EMAIL
Have a look at SpamAssassin. I installed it a few weeks ago and with a
little tweaking it's getting nearly 100% of the spam that comes through my
machine
Ed
~~
At 06:45 PM Thursday, 3/21/2002, you wrote -=
* shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] [21 Mar 02 17:10]:
also they should not include any
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 01:48:34 -0500 (EST)
adam.e.willcox.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
I heard a second hand story from someone who had setup a defined list of
people who he could receive e-mail from in his evolution client. Anyone
whom wasn't on his list would
I heard a second hand story from someone who had setup a defined list of
people who he could receive e-mail from in his evolution client. Anyone
whom wasn't on his list would receive an automated warning saying if they
e-mail him again they must pay a 5,000 dollar fine. Eventually it caught
Has anyone had experience with spam filters - I am thinking of those routines
which will identify spammed messages and send relevant data to the growing
spam filter servers? I have had a cursory look at spamassassin and
mailscanner but have not got either running successfully.
Having
On Tue, 25 Dec 2001 10:47:10 +
Alan Dunford [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
Has anyone had experience with spam filters - I am thinking of those routines
which will identify spammed messages and send relevant data to the growing
spam filter servers? I
No, nothing like that, just an HTML attachment which when opened produced a
form inviting me to subscribe to some sort of credit checking/e commerce
service, I have just noticed that there is an e mail on this list from Tomek
Nowinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the source of my mysterious e mail
I wonder what country has .PL?
I always think .pl is a perl script?
On Saturday 08 December 2001 05:46, you wrote:
poczta.tvfamilijna.pl
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Take a look at Postini
http://www.google.com/search?q=Postinichk=on
Alex
Matt Greer wrote:
From: Matt Koppelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am a new sysadmin for my ISP.. we have a horrible spam problem here, and
no one has done anything in the past to resolve it.
I have decent linux experience,
.pl is poland, I believe.
Michael
--
Michael Viron
Registered Linux User #81978
Senior Systems Administration Consultant
Web Spinners, University of West Florida
At 11:17 AM 12/08/2001 -0500, you wrote:
I wonder what country has .PL?
I always think .pl is a perl script?
On Saturday 08
I received an e mail, obviously spam, which came to the e mail address which
I use exclusively for this list, it appears that addresses may have been
harvested (has any one alse had it ?)
Strangely though, it does not appear to be addressed to me, any ideas how it
got to me, the message
Spam? maybe, worm? more than likely. i got to you because Uncle Bill wants to
drag the internet to his knees so he can sell more stuff.
On Friday 07 December 2001 05:20, you wrote:
I received an e mail, obviously spam, which came to the e mail address
which I use exclusively for this list, it
On Friday 07 December 2001 10:20, you wrote:
About half my daily spam is e-mail that does not have my e-mail address.
I got around this by setting up a filter that puts to trash anything that
does not contain any of my actuall e-mail adresses.
I received an e mail, obviously spam, which came
No, not a worm some sort of invitation to subscribe to an internet trading
service - I send details, they set it up for free... yeah, right.
On Friday 07 December 2001 10:53 am, you wrote:
Spam? maybe, worm? more than likely. i got to you because Uncle Bill wants
to drag the internet to
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:20:33 -0800 (PST)
Paul Schwebel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt,
have you looked into setting up some regex's in the SMTP's configuration
file. This is one good way to start taking a bite out of all that crap
they're
On Wednesday 05 December 2001 11:19 am, you wrote:
Thanks, Mark. I am familiar with regular expressions from years ago when I
ran an SCO 4.2-based BBS (remember BBSes?). I'm getting back into *nix with
Linux, and I'm amazed at the number of things I've forgotten. Concise,
clear explanations
Thanks, Mark. I am familiar with regular expressions from years ago when I ran
an SCO 4.2-based BBS (remember BBSes?). I'm getting back into *nix with Linux,
and I'm amazed at the number of things I've forgotten. Concise, clear
explanations like yours are very helpful.
-Paul He can be taught!
I am a new sysadmin for my ISP.. we have a horrible
spam problem here, and no one has done anything in the past to resolve it.
I have decent linux experience, but i wouldnt
exactly call myself a pro.. :) i have been looking into blackmail, but it seems
very difficult to install.
I was
-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Newbie@Linux-Mandrake. Com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] SPAM FILTER
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:12:16 -0500
I am a new sysadmin for my ISP.. we have a horrible spam problem here, and
no one has done anything in the past to resolve it.
I have decent linux experience, but i
Spam Assassin is worth looking at http://spamassassin.sourceforge.net
It performs textual analysis of mails and scores them. It also looks up known
spammers and includes the Vipul's Razor collective spam database that was
featured on Slashdot a couple of days ago.
The Perl version is probably a
From: Matt Koppelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am a new sysadmin for my ISP.. we have a horrible spam problem here, and
no one has done anything in the past to resolve it.
I have decent linux experience, but i wouldnt exactly call myself a pro..
:) i have been looking into blackmail, but it seems
i dunno.. i dont have THAT much experience.. i've heard procmail is a
nightmare to install, i'm looking for something quick, and easy..
- Original Message -
From: Matt Greer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM FILTER
] wrote:
i dunno.. i dont have THAT much experience.. i've heard procmail is a
nightmare to install, i'm looking for something quick, and easy..
- Original Message -
From: Matt Greer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie
--- Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt,
have you looked into setting up some regex's in the SMTP's configuration
file. This is one good way to start taking a bite out of all that crap
they're sending at your mailservers.
snip
Could you explain what regex's in the SMTP'S
is a
nightmare to install, i'm looking for something quick, and easy..
- Original Message -
From: Matt Greer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM FILTER
From: Matt Koppelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am a new
Matt Koppelman wrote:
I am a new sysadmin for my ISP.. we have a horrible spam problem here,
greetings matt,
congrats on your new position.
everyone has a horrible time with spam. so do not feel alone.
no one has done anything in the past to resolve it.
because it is such a problem, is
, i'm looking for something quick, and easy..
- Original Message -
From: Matt Greer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM FILTER
From: Matt Koppelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am a new sysadmin for my ISP.. we have
Matt,
have you looked into setting up some regex's in the SMTP's configuration
file. This is one good way to start taking a bite out of all that crap
they're sending at your mailservers. That is definatelythe first place i
would start to look as opposed to finding a third party app to take care
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM FILTER
From: Matt Koppelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am a new sysadmin for my ISP.. we have a horrible spam problem here,
and
no one has done anything in the past to resolve it.
I
Could someone define what spam is for me? That is is there a dictionary definition for
Spam.
I thought spam was sending e-mail that someone is trying to sell me something or
someone sending me repeated e-mail even when I have asked them not to.
Get your own FREE E-mail address at
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:59 AM
Subject: [newbie] SPAM
Could someone define what spam is for me? That is is there a
dictionary definition for Spam.
I thought spam was sending e-mail that someone is trying to sell me
something or someone sending me repeated e-mail even
I'm sorry I didn't know the situation. It sounds to me like this was not a mistake. I
have made mistakes sending mail. I would apoligize for shure plus it would not be
multiple or bulk. You are right that the newbie list is not the place for it. No place
is the place for SPAM.
Get your own
it
and it was sent in bulk (via the Newbie list) thus it is SPAM.
Robert MacLean
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:59 AM
Subject: [newbie] SPAM
Could someone define what spam is for me? That is is there a
dictionary
I read that the list administrators send the junk mail to different
organizations. Could someone indicate one of them? I have some spam I want
to send to them in order to stop the spammers.
Thank you.
Olaf
Configuration: Celeron 333A, 128 MB, 6+3 GB HD, SoundBlaster 128 PCI,
Realtek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 04 August 2001 07:03, Olaf Marzocchi wrote:
I read that the list administrators send the junk mail to different
organizations. Could someone indicate one of them? I have some spam I want
to send to them in order to stop the spammers.
IL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
- Original Message -
From: Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
maybe English is a second language for this p
0
From: adam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
- Original Message -
From: Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
maybe English
ot;
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Dennis Myers wrote:
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:20:49 -0600
From: Dennis Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
If you are trying to hit the guy with a blast of copies you have set your
email to send everything in multiple copie
+1000
From: Anthony Daniell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
Does anyone know adam's email address as he keeps sending the same email to
the list
Just visiting this planet,
Please sign the Linux Driver petition
http://www.libran
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
Anthony,
It's right there on the message. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Mark
"If you don't share your concepts and ideals, they end up being
worthless,"
"Sharing is what makes
On Tuesday 27 February 2001 05:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday I posted that I had not come across this - I have now !
My question, I use Kmail and would like to bounce these but there
does not appear to be a filter rule "bounce" does anyone no how to do
this ? If not will forwarding
Kehley wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 21:56:59 -0500
From: Carl Kehley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
I don't really know which is more annoying-the autoreply, or the
poor spelling.
Cyber Sam wrote:
You my knowledge,
hless,"
"Sharing is what makes them powerful."
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Kyle Baker wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:02:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Kyle Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
The incredibly poor grammar an
- Original Message -
From: Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
maybe English is a second language for this person. In which case their
english isn't all that bad. Certainly much better then some folks
- Original Message -
From: Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
maybe English is a second language for this person. In which case their
english isn't all that bad. Certainly much better then some folks
- Original Message -
From: Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
maybe English is a second language for this person. In which case their
english isn't all that bad. Certainly much better then some folks
- Original Message -
From: Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
maybe English is a second language for this person. In which case their
english isn't all that bad. Certainly much better then some folks
- Original Message -
From: Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
maybe English is a second language for this person. In which case their
english isn't all that bad. Certainly much better then some folks
- Original Message -
From: Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
maybe English is a second language for this person. In which case their
english isn't all that bad. Certainly much better then some folks
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] SPAM
maybe English is a second language for this person. In which case their
english isn't all that bad. Certainly much better then some folks I know
that speak and write the language as their mother
2001 22:46:29 -0500
From: Adam Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] SPAM
Actually, this whole kinda thing is getting annoying. You guys are becomming
no better than the spammer. Please don't hate me for asking this, but why
are we dr
You my knowledge, having an
autoreply assigned to my email is not spamming, if in the opinion of the
moderators of this list it is considered spam, I should let you know that I run
a legal business on the web that requires that my customers get a timely reply
to all of there queries.
I
legal arguments aside, its unsolicited email that i (and others) receive from you it
is rude and inconsiderate, you can just as easily filter it
Cyber Sam wrote:
You my knowledge, having an autoreply assigned to my email is not spamming, if in
the opinion of the moderators of this list it is
For starters, you could be a little more apologetic and have explained
your position, rather than trying to make into a "list" problem,
especially in light of the fact you are apparently on this list for
help;-) How does it go..."You can catch more flies with sugar than with
sh*t"Don't bite
created on 04-nov-1998.
database last updated on 26-feb-2001 08:31:31 est.
domain servers in listed order:
ns.skyport.net 216.169.96.10
ns2.skyport.net
- Original Message -
From: "angry" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:44 PM
Subject: R
Presumably you subscribed to this list becuase you're a LInux-Mandrake user
who can benefit from the help of other users. The request that you not send
autoreplies to the list is perfectly legitimate. (And if one person actually
expressed it, you can be sure lots of others are at least
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 7:55
PM
Subject: [newbie] SPAM
You my knowledge, having
an autoreply assigned to my email is not spamming, if in the opinion of the
moderators of this list it is considered spam, I should let you know that I
run a legal business
I don't really know which is more annoying-the autoreply, or the
poor spelling.
Cyber Sam wrote:
You my knowledge, having an autoreply assigned to my email is not
spamming, if in the opinion of the moderators of this list it is
considered spam, I should let you know that I run a legal
the truth is that unsolicited e-mail IS Spam. and just what
kind of BS business are you hoping for help here.. maybe that someday you will
have a "real" website.. instead of just a "dotcom" name your mommy thinks is
catchy.???
If you do not like the fact that my company has
an
I vote for the poor spelling and improper grammar (it's=it is, as an
example). Spam can be dealt with. Incorrigibles cannot.
Rob
On Monday 26 February 2001 21:56, you wrote:
I don't really know which is more annoying-the autoreply, or the
poor spelling.
Cyber Sam wrote:
You my
Actually, this whole kinda thing is getting annoying. You guys are becomming
no better than the spammer. Please don't hate me for asking this, but why
are we dragging this out? Its getting kinda boring. You know where he lives.
Anyone who's in the general area go kick his butt, in the meantime,
I agree..
Adam Baxter wrote:
Actually, this whole kinda thing is getting annoying. You guys are becomming
no better than the spammer. Please don't hate me for asking this, but why
are we dragging this out? Its getting kinda boring. You know where he lives.
Anyone who's in the general area
The incredibly poor grammar and egregious spelling (in)ability
was far worse than the autoreply, which is saying a lot...
--- rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vote for the poor spelling and improper grammar (it's=it is,
as an
example). Spam can be dealt with. Incorrigibles cannot.
Rob
At 08:19 20/12/99 +0200, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't we have filters for this crap???
There has been a lot of this sort of shit coming through for the past couple
of days.
Can it be blocked please...
I think this is now the time for linux-mandrake.com to switch its mail
transport
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** URGENT ***
ACCEPT CREDIT CARDS FOR YOUR BUSINESS
AND INCREASE YOUR PROFITS 30%-50% !
INTERNET
STOREFRONT
HOMEBASED OR
100 matches
Mail list logo
