On Tuesday 29 July 2003 05:03 pm, Graham Banks wrote:
> Aron Smith wrote:
> > On Monday 28 July 2003 04:50 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 09:20, Aron Smith wrote:
> >>>On Monday 28 July 2003 03:34 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 09:58, Eric Huff wrote:
> >
Aron Smith wrote:
On Monday 28 July 2003 04:50 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 09:20, Aron Smith wrote:
On Monday 28 July 2003 03:34 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 09:58, Eric Huff wrote:
BTW a shrimp on the barbie --why would you put shellfish on a doll
; >
Shrimp
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 02:18 am, Frankie wrote:
> Nah, they're all inflatable.
I prefer the term "adjustable"
--
/\
Dark>
On 28 Jul 2003 at 23:55, Aron Smith wrote:
> On Monday 28 July 2003 11:18 pm, Frankie wrote:
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen
> > Kuhn
> > Sent: Tuesday, 29 July 2003 6:42 AM
> > To: Mandrake Newbie
> > Subject: Re: [newbie] Intro
> >
>
On Monday 28 July 2003 11:18 pm, Frankie wrote:
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen
> Kuhn
> Sent: Tuesday, 29 July 2003 6:42 AM
> To: Mandrake Newbie
> Subject: Re: [newbie] Intro
>
> On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 12:49, Aron Smith wrote:
> > Whot the Aussie gals a
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen
Kuhn
Sent: Tuesday, 29 July 2003 6:42 AM
To: Mandrake Newbie
Subject: Re: [newbie] Intro
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 12:49, Aron Smith wrote:
> Whot the Aussie gals ain't real?
Nah, they're all inflatable.
--
FRANKI:
I'll have you know
Oh, you [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 28 July 2003 06:26 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
> On Monday 28 July 2003 04:50 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 09:20, Aron Smith wrote:
> > What y'all need to see are "Balmain Bugs"; makes ya rethink eating
> > shellfish. We do have some prawns here
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 15:12, Frankie wrote:
> FRANKI: Stephen, you sick bastard.. your giving Aussies a
> bad name here. :-)
Mate, that's like impossible to do in the first place.
--
Tue Jul 29 08:40:01 EST 2003
08:40:01 up 15 days, 43 min, 2 users, load average: 0.26, 0.31, 0.31
---
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 09:58, Eric Huff wrote:
> > BTW a shrimp on the barbie --why would you put shellfish on a doll ; >
>
> Shrimp is stephen's pet name for ken.
BTW, in relearning "English" - we don't say "shrimp" here - it's
"prawns"
--
Tue Jul 29 08:30:01 EST 2003
08:30:01 up 15 days, 33 mi
On Monday 28 July 2003 04:12 am, ed tharp wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 12:11, burns wrote:
> > gee, I'm terribly sorry, but I didn't see any 'fees', but I might get a
> > few 'foes' if I don't, eh? So how much are these 'fees' and what was the
> > address to send them to? Will you take cash, all
On Monday 28 July 2003 13:33, Aron Smith wrote:
>
> ** Death by Pun (we killed stephen last week it's just now wearing off) :
> ))
Nah...(free to Frank Zappa):
Stephen's not dead, he just smells funny.
--
Good luck,
HarM
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.m
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 12:11, burns wrote:
> gee, I'm terribly sorry, but I didn't see any 'fees', but I might get a few
> 'foes' if I don't, eh? So how much are these 'fees' and what was the address
> to send them to? Will you take cash, all in coin of course, pennies to be
> exact.. LOL
>
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:12:45 +0800
"Frankie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> insightfully noted:
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen
>Kuhn
>
>On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 09:05, Aron Smith wrote:
>
>>> what'sa matter stephen Nigerian letter not working th
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 09:05, Aron Smith wrote:
what'sa matter stephen Nigerian letter not working this week ?
BTW a shrimp on the barbie --why would you put shellfish on a doll ; >
To make the doll smell more real.
They have meds for that.
--
Brant Fitzsimmons
[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen
Kuhn
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 09:05, Aron Smith wrote:
>> what'sa matter stephen Nigerian letter not working this
week ?
>> BTW a shrimp on the barbie --why would you put shellfish
on a doll ; >
>To make
> BTW a shrimp on the barbie --why would you put shellfish on a doll ; >
Shrimp is stephen's pet name for ken.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Why not ship him the equivalent in lead? $400.00 in USD of lead ingots should wiegh in
at about 280 pounds, and will cost about $1000.00 USD to ship to Australia. Stephen,
the way I see it, you owe him about $600.00 ! See what you get for not sharing? LOL!
Man,...what some guys will do to be abl
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 02:19, burns wrote:
> LOL How new am I? Just born! I have a USB connected JamCam, and I have
> installed the gtkam through Control center, in multimedia/graphics, I now
> have GTkam. I have set my JamCam, and gtkam says it has received 4 frames,
> but there are no thu
On 7/28/2003 at 9:32 AM Stephen Kuhn wrote:
>> BTW a shrimp on the barbie --why would you put shellfish on a doll ; >
>
>To make the doll smell more real.
Man, I saw that one coming! Can't believe you walked into that one Aron!
Lanman
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go t
Oh No! You don't get off that easy. It's $400 in pennies, and the receiver
pays the shipping, or no deal... (:>)
larry
On July 27, 2003 11:31 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 02:11, burns wrote:
> > gee, I'm terribly sorry, but I didn't see any 'fees', but I might get a
> > f
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 09:05, Aron Smith wrote:
> what'sa matter stephen Nigerian letter not working this week ?
> BTW a shrimp on the barbie --why would you put shellfish on a doll ; >
To make the doll smell more real.
--
Mon Jul 28 09:30:01 EST 2003
09:30:01 up 14 days, 1:33, 2 users, load
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 02:11, burns wrote:
> gee, I'm terribly sorry, but I didn't see any 'fees', but I might get a few
> 'foes' if I don't, eh? So how much are these 'fees' and what was the address
> to send them to? Will you take cash, all in coin of course, pennies to be
> exact.. LOL
>
LOL How new am I? Just born! I have a USB connected JamCam, and I have
installed the gtkam through Control center, in multimedia/graphics, I now
have GTkam. I have set my JamCam, and gtkam says it has received 4 frames,
but there are no thumbnail images, nada.
So now I wait for some p
On Sunday 27 July 2003 03:49 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 21:23, burns wrote:
> > Hi, just climbed aboard, wanted to try this out to see if I have the
> > technic right..
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > larry
>
> Did you pay the initial MDK Newbie Email List Fee?
> (Payable to ME - either
gee, I'm terribly sorry, but I didn't see any 'fees', but I might get a few
'foes' if I don't, eh? So how much are these 'fees' and what was the address
to send them to? Will you take cash, all in coin of course, pennies to be
exact.. LOL
larry
On July 27, 2003 10:49 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrot
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 21:23, burns wrote:
> Hi, just climbed aboard, wanted to try this out to see if I have the technic
> right..
>
> thanks
>
> larry
Did you pay the initial MDK Newbie Email List Fee?
(Payable to ME - either by cheque, money order or credit card)
--
Mon Jul 28 08:45:00 EST
On Sunday 27 July 2003 07:40 am, burns wrote:
> On July 27, 2003 07:07 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Sunday 27 Jul 2003 12:23 pm, burns wrote:
> > > Hi, just climbed aboard, wanted to try this out to see if I have
> > > the technic right..
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > larry
> >
> > Welcome aboard
hi Larry,
It seems that the camera is supported by gphoto2. If you did a multimedia
install, it should be under . Run the program and it
should be fairly intuitive setting up the cam. The website is...
http://www.gphoto.org
Once the pics are retrieved you can manipulate them with a numb
On July 27, 2003 07:07 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 27 Jul 2003 12:23 pm, burns wrote:
> > Hi, just climbed aboard, wanted to try this out to see if I have
> > the technic right..
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > larry
>
> Welcome aboard, Larry. Looks OK to me
>
> Anne
I have a digital camera, (jamc
On Sunday 27 Jul 2003 12:23 pm, burns wrote:
> Hi, just climbed aboard, wanted to try this out to see if I have
> the technic right..
>
> thanks
>
> larry
Welcome aboard, Larry. Looks OK to me
Anne
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> Add my name to that list as well!
And mine. I hate HTML e-mails and tell everyone I know to use plain text.
--
Live long and prosper!
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Sunday 30 June 2002 02:32 am, you wrote:
> Yes, Sridhar, you have nailed it. There is a time and place for html,
> and email is not it. Kind of like using a backhoe to weed your garden.
> I side with you and all the others who join in the denouncement of the
> heinous html email. :)
>
>
> L8
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 06:41, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 11:25:28 +0100, John Richard Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I perfer netscape, but cannot be bothered to install it.
> >
> > So I use kmail, the composer has limited
> > character set usage,(I do not mean fonts)
dfox wrote:
Randy Kramer wrote:
> > And, if spammers wanted to reach people who have specified their
> > preference not to receive HTML / XML mail, they'd have to send plain
>
> Spammers could care less. Most of the spam I get now is all html or
> in chinese. They don't even care if the person o
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 07:12 pm, Charlie wrote:
> June 12, 2002 04:26 pm, shane wrote:
> > if good to you means sending html, unless netscape still does, your out
> > of luck.
> >
> > do you want to be hated on email lists? all the html senders are, linux
> > list and non alike.
> >
> > i stil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 08:54 am, John Richard Smith did speak unto the
huddled masses, saying:
> On Tuesday 11 June 2002 22:57, you wrote:
> Well, all this seems to be telling me that I cannot expect or hope
> to ever get a good quality emailer
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 22:57, you wrote:
Well, all this seems to be telling me that I cannot expect or hope
to ever get a good quality emailer from Mandrake.
Plain text means lack of scope, one uniform font, one uniform font
size , no resizing of sections of text, no bold type, no font colour
or, you can just set a filter to /dev/null for any mail with or Linux Maniac wrote:
> > Maybe there should be an other email format, let's call it nextmail.
> > It would be xml based and would NOT be compatible with the current
> > email system, even the adress would be different like
> > newbie
> Besides, what can't be said in plain text e-mail? Do you lack the necessary
> communication skills to use simple words? Did Tolkien write using fancy fonts
Well, discounting Elvish perhaps, no.
> and colours? My point is that HTML mail is simply unnecessary. Do you want
> /italics/, _underlin
> Another point, John: If you really want to see something ugly, take a look at
> an html e-mail with html disabled. You'll see that the message becomes
It also is a good visual indication of how wasteful HTML email can be. I
have seen numerous examples of dozens of etc. ;(
Want to bu
On Monday 10 June 2002 06:34 pm, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> On Monday 10 June 2002 04:39 pm, s wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, I vote for kmail too, tho after 30 or 40 thousand messages, it
> > starts to choke. :)(had to rename my Mail folder today). :(
> >
> > -s
>
> My version has a delete function. V
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 11:10, you wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:46:08 +0100
>
> John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 June 2002 15:17, you wrote:
> > > Besides, what can't be said in plain text e-mail? Do you lack the
> > > necessary communication skills to use simple
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, John Richard Smith wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 June 2002 15:17, you wrote:
> >
> >
> > Besides, what can't be said in plain text e-mail? Do you lack the
> > necessary communication skills to use simple words? Did Tolkien
> > write using fancy fonts and colours? My point is that HT
Warren Post wrote:
>
> I'm not familiar with Calypso, so I can't compare, but I use Evolution
> 1.0.2, and it certainly is full featured. It's also a bit buggy, so if
> there's a more recent version grab it. Another full featured client is
> Aethera, although I haven't tried it.
>
> Warren
>
>
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 01:49 pm, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:46:08 +0100, John Richard Smith
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 June 2002 15:17, you wrote:
> > > Besides, what can't be said in plain text e-mail? Do you lack the
> > > necessary communication sk
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:46:08 +0100, John Richard Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 June 2002 15:17, you wrote:
> >
> >
> > Besides, what can't be said in plain text e-mail? Do you lack the
> > necessary communication skills to use simple words? Did Tolkien
> > write using fancy font
Hey all,
I just installed Ximian Gnome last night and noticed that the installer
now has an option to install only Evolution. Therefore, if you're
interested in using Evolution and want the most recent version without
having to install all of Ximian Gnome and without waiting for Mandrake
to relea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 6:46 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
> Plain text is all right as far as it goes, I don't mind using it for
> say Newbie, or just sending an order to some sales person,
> but 99% of the world traffic in emails is HTML. Yes it is
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:46:08 +0100
John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 June 2002 15:17, you wrote:
> >
> >
> > Besides, what can't be said in plain text e-mail? Do you lack the
> > necessary communication skills to use simple words? Did Tolkien
> > write using fancy font
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 15:17, you wrote:
>
>
> Besides, what can't be said in plain text e-mail? Do you lack the
> necessary communication skills to use simple words? Did Tolkien
> write using fancy fonts and colours? My point is that HTML mail is
> simply unnecessary. Do you want /italics/, _und
Using html email is somewhat like asking to borrow my phone and calling
Afhganistan. Rude at best. (I learned that right here last year)
Lee
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 10:17 am, you wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:16:00 +0100, John Richard Smith
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 00:34, you wrote:
> On Monday 10 June 2002 04:39 pm, s wrote:
> > On Monday 10 June 2002 03:37 pm, Gerald Waugh wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 June 2002 11:28 am, Bulloved wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > What Linux email clients do people on the list prefer?
> > >
>
I perfer netscap
Warren Post wrote:
> I'm not familiar with Calypso, so I can't compare, but I use Evolution
> 1.0.2, and it certainly is full featured. It's also a bit buggy,
Well they _did_ say they were trying to write something like Outlook ;-)
Seriously, though, Evolution is impressive. I'm back with Mo
I'm not familiar with Calypso, so I can't compare, but I use Evolution
1.0.2, and it certainly is full featured. It's also a bit buggy, so if
there's a more recent version grab it. Another full featured client is
Aethera, although I haven't tried it.
Warren
On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 09:28, Bulloved
On Monday 10 June 2002 04:37 pm, you wrote:
> On Monday 10 June 2002 11:28 am, Bulloved wrote:
>
>
> > What Linux email clients do people on the list prefer?
>
> I like kmail
Same here, but my wife uses Evolution.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrake
On Monday 10 June 2002 05:34 pm, you wrote:
KMail is very functional and easy to use, but I wish it had an option to not
preview a message until I explicitly tell it too, as I could do with Outlook
Express. I understand that I can take off html preview completely but that
isn't what I want.
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:28:29 -0400, "Bulloved" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> After having made numerous attempts at installing various distros of Linux
> over a period of three years with no success,I was delighted to find that
> the Mandrake 8.2 installer worked without a hitch. I now
On Monday 10 June 2002 04:39 pm, s wrote:
> On Monday 10 June 2002 03:37 pm, Gerald Waugh wrote:
> > On Monday 10 June 2002 11:28 am, Bulloved wrote:
> >
> >
> > > What Linux email clients do people on the list prefer?
> >
> > I like kmail
>
> Yeah, I vote for kmail too, tho after 30 or 40 thousa
> What Linux email clients do people on the list prefer?
>
> TIA for any assistance anyone can offer.
I tried Sylpheed-Claws (not regular Sylpheed) and Evolution
as an Outlook Express convert. Evolution has the best search
tools, and it has other tools like unto the full Outlook.
But it loads r
On Monday 10 June 2002 03:37 pm, Gerald Waugh wrote:
> On Monday 10 June 2002 11:28 am, Bulloved wrote:
>
>
> > What Linux email clients do people on the list prefer?
>
> I like kmail
Yeah, I vote for kmail too, tho after 30 or 40 thousand messages, it starts to
choke. :)(had to rename my
Go ahead and install 7.1. You're going to like it...A LOT! However, XF86
4.0 is still a little buggy so you will want to load the older version
that comes with 7.1. You will be prompted as to which one you wish to
load. I will forewarn you though. It is very likely that an upgrade from
your curren
> I currently have Mandrake 6.0 installed on its own hard drive
> I did the default workstation install. There is currently one
> problem... annoying, does not appear to be hurtful... HDA5
> seems to be messed up on every other boot forcing fsck to run
> during the boot sequence, which so far ha
62 matches
Mail list logo
