RE: OT - ugh!

al Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2012 9:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! You can look at it in one of two ways: Either you and MBS got very lucky, or you got very smart. The niches you've chosen are specialised eno

Re: OT - ugh!

linkedin.com/profile/view?id=2881785> >> >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* Tony Patton [mailto:apco...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 07, 2012 5:06 PM >> >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* Re: OT - ugh! >> >>

Re: OT - ugh!

; > > ** ** > > *From:* Tony Patton [mailto:apco...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 07, 2012 5:06 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: OT - ugh! > > ** ** > > I'm one of them. We don't use AppSense yet, but at least one o

RE: OT - ugh!

LOL.. Are you able to give us some of the stats Jacob? They'd be very interesting I'm sure. James. -Original Message- From: Jacob [mailto:ja...@excaliburfilms.com] Sent: Thursday, 9 February 2012 5:37 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - ugh! 1 million view

Re: OT - ugh!

ystem Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - ugh! Ok rub in. I suck. :-P That's assume. :) -Original Message- From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 9:51 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! What surprised me after I posted my

RE: OT - ugh!

Unfortunately no... VMWare and RDP -Original Message- From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 12:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! LOL, ummm do they "do" anything Citrix related? Or is this more related to

Re: OT - ugh!

--Original Message- > From: Jacob [mailto:ja...@excaliburfilms.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 2:37 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: OT - ugh! > > 1 million views? That is all? > > I can offer content that will exploded your views...

Re: OT - ugh!

dad, and 13-y/o look at? :-) > >Regards, > >Michael B. Smith >Consultant and Exchange MVP >http://TheEssentialExchange.com > > >-Original Message- >From: Jacob [mailto:ja...@excaliburfilms.com] >Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 2:37 PM >To: NT System Admin Is

Re: OT - ugh!

day, February 08, 2012 10:20 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: OT - ugh! > > Ok rub in. I suck. :-P > > That's assume. :) > > > > -Original Message- > From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] > Sent: Wednesday, Februa

Re: OT - ugh!

LOL, ummm do they "do" anything Citrix related? Or is this more related to the "open directory" thread? Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com On 2/8/12 10:36 AM, "Jacob" wrote: >1 million views? That is all? >

RE: OT - ugh!

: RE: OT - ugh! 1 million views? That is all? I can offer content that will exploded your views... -Original Message- From: Mathew Shember [mailto:mathew.shem...@synopsys.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 10:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - ugh! Ok rub in. I

RE: OT - ugh!

1 million views? That is all? I can offer content that will exploded your views... -Original Message- From: Mathew Shember [mailto:mathew.shem...@synopsys.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 10:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - ugh! Ok rub in. I suck. :-P That&#

RE: OT - ugh!

Ok rub in. I suck. :-P That's assume. :) -Original Message- From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 9:51 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! What surprised me after I posted my very first article was how fast I was

Re: OT - ugh!

t; Regards, >> >> >> >> Michael B. Smith >> >> Consultant and Exchange MVP >> >> http://TheEssentialExchange.com >> >> >> >> *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com >> <mailt

Re: OT - ugh!

gt;>Michael B. Smith >> >>Consultant and Exchange MVP >> >>http://TheEssentialExchange.**com <http://TheEssentialExchange.com> >> >> >>*From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com >><mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com&g

RE: OT - ugh!

ecially if you want greater traffic. Thanks, Mathew -Original Message- From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 8:40 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! Out of curiosity, do you guys worry about SEO and your blog? Or do you

Re: OT - ugh!

egards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com <mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com>] *Sent:* Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:32 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:*

RE: OT - ugh!

- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Jonathan Link wrote: >> I'm doing RFPs and vendor selection and all that right now, and every >> sales

RE: OT - ugh!

System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! If you get into anything just for the money, you will not make it. And it by chance you do make it, you will not be happy. I give away a lot of time and info for free (as I know MBS, ASB and BD do). I have actually told prospects that I have an article

Re: OT - ugh!

oney to take the course (using a fellow >>>> CTPs partner status to get it dirt cheap) but that is a set of software >>>> with a LOT of options. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>>Carl Webster >>>> >>>> Consul

Re: OT - ugh!

is.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:53 -0800 Subject: Re: OT - ugh! > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Jonathan Link > wrote: > >> I'm doing RFPs and vendor selection and all that right now, > >> and every salesdroid I talk to wants to do the touc

Re: OT - ugh!

If you get into anything just for the money, you will not make it. And it by chance you do make it, you will not be happy. I give away a lot of time and info for free (as I know MBS, ASB and BD do). I have actually told prospects that I have an article written that covers the work they want me t

Re: OT - ugh!

312.625.1438 | c   - 312.731.3132 -Original Message- From: Jacob Kisner [mailto:jbdkis...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:52 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! "Because we feel you are not diversified enough to address our issues." Same issu

Re: OT - ugh!

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote: > I do try to get my name in front of past customers at > least once a quarter, usually via a quick-tip of some type that I think would > apply to their environment. Well, you're an independent consultant, which is a bit different. You're

RE: OT - ugh!

Tuesday, February 07, 2012 5:06 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! I'm one of them. We don't use AppSense yet, but at least one of our contracts will be using it this year. Never know when things come in handy :-) I'm thinking of setting up a blog/wiki type sit

Re: OT - ugh!

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote: > I'm sure you feel more confident dealing with someone you trust than > with someone who you just "found on the Internet". Absolutely. But I also know how sales works. They've been trained to ask how I'm doing at the start of the call

Re: OT - ugh!

sentialExchange.com > > > -Original Message- > From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 4:20 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: OT - ugh! > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Michael B. Smith > wrote: > > It wo

RE: OT - ugh!

- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 5:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Jonathan Link wrote: >> I'm doing RFPs and vendor selection and all that right now, >> and every salesdroi

RE: OT - ugh!

r software purchases (no services) I agree that it gets in the way. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 4:20 PM To: NT System Admin Issues S

Re: OT - ugh!

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Jonathan Link wrote: >> I'm doing RFPs and vendor selection and all that right now, >> and every salesdroid I talk to wants to do the touchy-feeling >> in-person meeting thing. > > If you tell them that you don't like to be handled, they won't. > A lot of sales peop

Re: OT - ugh!

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote: > It would always > bore me how they’d spend time talking about the bosses and subordinates and > the wives and the kids – but you know – it makes a difference. It’s called > “relationship building” and it helps establish trust and rapport.

Re: OT - ugh!

mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:32 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: OT - ugh! > > ** ** > > I'm just converting all the documents I wrote into posts. It's actually > kind of handy to have them all

Re: OT - ugh!

;http://www.carlwebster.com/> > > From: James Rankin > Reply-To: NT Issues > Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 20:18:25 + > > To: NT Issues > Subject: Re: OT - ugh! > > Been a big help to me too. I am just trying now how to work out how to > get the most work from two

Re: OT - ugh!

sadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>> Subject: Re: OT - ugh! Been a big help to me too. I am just trying now how to work out how to get the most work from two clients. I have an offer in the post for ten days' work for a fairly high-profile client but also an overlapping offer for a month

Re: OT - ugh!

Yes - thanks to you for sharing guys!  It's very encouraging to read your success stories and the way you got there. Much appreciated! Don K From: James Rankin To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 2:18 PM Subject: Re: OT

Re: OT - ugh!

> > ** ** > > *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:32 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: OT - ugh! > > ** ** > > I'm just converting all the documents I wrote into posts. It's ac

Re: OT - ugh!

add 1 or 2 more readers for you. > > >Carl Webster > > Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional > > http://www.CarlWebster.com <http://www.carlwebster.com/> > > From: James Rankin > Reply-To: NT Issues > Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 19:31:49 + >

Re: OT - ugh!

> turned down over the years while working for that big client. Thanks! > > ** ** > > *From:* Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] > *Sent:* Monday, February 06, 2012 11:01 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: OT - ugh! > > ** ** &g

Re: OT - ugh!

James Rankin mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com>> Reply-To: NT Issues mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 19:31:49 + To: NT Issues mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>> Subject: Re: OT - ugh! I'm just converting all the documents I wr

RE: OT - ugh!

Monday, February 06, 2012 11:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - ugh! I hate to sound corny or mystical, but I'll write it anyway: if you believe, the Universe will provide. You just have to be willing to open the damn door when opportunity knocks. Regards, Michael B. Smit

RE: OT - ugh!

] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:32 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! I'm just converting all the documents I wrote into posts. It's actually kind of handy to have them all stored online rather than drag them everywhere with me. I've already had a guy from Ap

Re: OT - ugh!

Citrix Technology Professional > > http://www.CarlWebster.com <http://www.carlwebster.com/> > > From: James Rankin > Reply-To: NT Issues > Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:39:29 + > > To: NT Issues > Subject: Re: OT - ugh! > > Well, I decided to start blogging

Re: OT - ugh!

gt; CTPs partner status to get it dirt cheap) but that is a set of software >>> with a LOT of options. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>>Carl Webster >>> >>> Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional >>> >>> http://www

Re: OT - ugh!

yris.sunbelt-software.com>> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:39:29 + To: NT Issues mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>> Subject: Re: OT - ugh! Well, I decided to start blogging up a bit of AppSense stuff, and I seem to be enjoying it! Good call. Mr Webster, I offer no apologies

Re: OT - ugh!

to get it dirt cheap) but that is a set of software >> with a LOT of options. >> >> Thanks >> >> >>Carl Webster >> >> Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional >> >> http://www.CarlWebster.com <http://www.carlwebster.com/> >> &

RE: Consulting (was: OT - ugh!)

ilto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 2:36 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Consulting (was: OT - ugh!) Oh yeah, absolutely. Creating and maintaining a professional network is critical. I swap-off jobs and leads with probably 8-10 other independent consu

RE: Infrastructure Specialist defined - was: OT - ugh!

How long will you be in Seattle, MBS? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 3:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Infrastructure Specialist defined - was: OT - ugh! The last time I was in Seattle, I tried one on

Re: OT - ugh!

t; > Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional > > http://www.CarlWebster.com <http://www.carlwebster.com/> > > From: James Rankin > Reply-To: NT Issues > Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 20:16:47 + > > To: NT Issues > Subject: Re: OT - ugh! > > I actuall

Re: OT - ugh!

B. Smith > >> Consultant and Exchange MVP > >> http://TheEssentialExchange.com > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 8:20 PM > >> To: NT Sys

Re: OT - ugh!

Citrix Technology Professional > > http://www.CarlWebster.com <http://www.carlwebster.com/> > > From: Andrew Baker > Reply-To: NT Issues > Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:17:21 -0500 > > To: NT Issues > Subject: Re: OT - ugh! > > *>>If it gets any better, MB

RE: OT - ugh!

ilto:jstew...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 7:03 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! I've spent the last year working for an ERP consulting company and I've been in a lot of small businesses that have outsourced IT support. I have yet to meet a client who

RE: OT - ugh!

...@briandesmond.com w – 312.625.1438 | c   – 312.731.3132 -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 6:20 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! You can look at it in one of two ways: Either you and MBS got very lucky, or

RE: OT - ugh!

rian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 4:04 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - ugh! I want it now. :) Three clients isn't enough. I have 5 HUGE clients and clos

Re: OT - ugh!

: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 8:20 PM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: Re: OT - ugh! >> >> You can look at it in one of two ways: >> >> Either you and MBS got very lucky, or you got very smart. >

Re: OT - ugh!

-Original Message- > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 8:20 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: OT - ugh! > > You can look at it in one of two ways: > > Either you and MBS got very lucky, or you got very smart. &g

RE: OT - ugh!

Whoa...déjà vu... From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 8:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - ugh! I hate to sound corny or mystical, but I'll write it anyway: if you believe, the Universe will provide. You just have to be wi

RE: OT - ugh!

d Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 10:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - ugh! Yeah I already figured I'd need 4 more clients of the same size as by biggest one. My biggest client is 3-10 hrs/week during "non-server upgrade" months. It would take 4

RE: OT - ugh!

ned up before I jumped. If I was single it would have been a no-brainer long ago... Dave From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 3:04 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - ugh! I want it now. :) Three clients isn't enough. I have 5 HUGE

RE: OT - ugh!

em Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! In 2007 I was doing so much AD and Exchange work, I seriously considered dropping Citrix from my skill set. I probably did 50% AD, 49% Exchange and 1% Citrix. Now it is 50% AD and 50% Citrix and my last production Exchange project was June 2008. My Exchange skil

Re: OT - ugh!

In 2007 I was doing so much AD and Exchange work, I seriously considered dropping Citrix from my skill set. I probably did 50% AD, 49% Exchange and 1% Citrix. Now it is 50% AD and 50% Citrix and my last production Exchange project was June 2008. My Exchange skills are so rusty, I am embarrassed

Re: OT - ugh!

y, February 06, 2012 8:20 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: OT - ugh! > > You can look at it in one of two ways: > > Either you and MBS got very lucky, or you got very smart. > > The niches you've chosen are specialised enough that you aren't doing > d

RE: OT - ugh!

Subject: Re: OT - ugh! You can look at it in one of two ways: Either you and MBS got very lucky, or you got very smart. The niches you've chosen are specialised enough that you aren't doing daily grunt work (punching down patchpanels, patching workstations, applying antivirus, replacing

Re: OT - ugh!

ster.com > > > From: David Lum > Reply-To: NT Issues > Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 22:31:45 + > To: NT Issues > Subject: RE: OT - ugh! > > That’s part of my fear of dropping %dayjob% and going 100% on my own biz – > feast or famine! With just three clients I have I’m al

Re: Infrastructure Specialist defined - was: OT - ugh!

ws Server Support > > > -Original Message- > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 1:03 PM > To: Heaton, Joseph@DFG; NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Infrastructure Specialist defined - was: OT - ugh! > > What MBS said - however, I do

Re: OT - ugh!

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:17:21 -0500 To: NT Issues mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>> Subject: Re: OT - ugh! >>If it gets any better, MBS is going to want a referral fee or commission! Not a bad idea. :) ASB http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker Harnessing the Advantages of Technolo

Re: Infrastructure Specialist defined - was: OT - ugh!

Talk like that and you will get Shooky Baby to drooling. :) Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com On 2/6/12 1:59 PM, "Michael B. Smith" wrote: >The last time I was in Seattle, I tried one on. They are very subst

Re: OT - ugh!

ant a referral fee or commission! > > >Carl Webster > > Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional > > http://www.CarlWebster.com <http://www.carlwebster.com/> > > From: David Lum > Reply-To: NT Issues > Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 22:31:45 + > To: NT Is

RE: OT - ugh!

em Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! I can only speak for me, and it has been feast since I went out on my own Feb 1st last year. So far this year, the feast is even better as there is very little agency work so I get 100% of the billables. :) Yes, I am complaining all the way to the bank.

Re: OT - ugh!

lost money those first two > months if I hadn’t spent the money on advertising. :-P > > ** ** > > Regards, > > ** ** > > Michael B. Smith > > Consultant and Exchange MVP > > http://TheEssentialExchange.com > > ** ** > > *From:* Don Kuhl

RE: OT - ugh!

m: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 5:49 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! I can only speak for me, and it has been feast since I went out on my own Feb 1st last year. So far this year, the feast is even better as there is very little agency wor

RE: Infrastructure Specialist defined - was: OT - ugh!

t defined - was: OT - ugh! That's a lot of money for one item of clothing, though... Joe Heaton ITB – Windows Server Support -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 1:03 PM To: Heaton, Joseph@DFG; NT System Admin Issues Subject

RE: OT - ugh!

Simply awesome. From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 2:49 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! I can only speak for me, and it has been feast since I went out on my own Feb 1st last year. So far this year, the feast is even better as

Re: OT - ugh!

Feb 2012 22:31:45 + To: NT Issues mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>> Subject: RE: OT - ugh! That’s part of my fear of dropping %dayjob% and going 100% on my own biz – feast or famine! With just three clients I have I’m always amazed at how often their feast/famine cycles

RE: Infrastructure Specialist defined - was: OT - ugh!

cture Specialist defined - was: OT - ugh! What MBS said - however, I do still stand out from the crowd, because it's not all *that* common. For instance, nobody at work besides me has worn one. It's still very common that I go to a public venue and get comments from folks - always approving an

RE: OT - ugh!

n SBS 2003 - SBS2011 swing for two of them. One of these clients I can go months with nothing other than patching. From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 9:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! I find myself busier than a one-arm paper h

Re: OT - ugh!

:33 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: Re: OT - ugh! PLEASE DO. I paid my own money to take the course (using a fellow CTPs partner status to get it dirt cheap) but that is a set of software with a LOT of options. Thanks Carl Webster Cons

Re: Infrastructure Specialist defined - was: OT - ugh!

n't see many kilts here in Southern Indiana, and then > usually just at formal occasions. > > -Original Message- > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 11:40 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Infrastructure Speci

Re: OT - ugh!

Wow - that's very cool. Carl.  Also very encouraging.  Thanks for sharing! Don K From: Webster To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 1:35 PM Subject: Re: OT - ugh! I will have to give MBS 100% credit.  He bugged, pestered, annoye

RE: OT - ugh!

Stoppit, you guys are making me dream... From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 11:36 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! I will have to give MBS 100% credit. He bugged, pestered, annoyed and prodded me until I started writing. Once I

Re: OT - ugh!

, 6 Feb 2012 19:35:57 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: Re: OT - ugh! I will have to give MBS 100% credit. He bugged, pestered, annoyed and prodded me until I started writing. Once I started writing, people started reading. Once people started

RE: Consulting (was: OT - ugh!)

://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 2:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Consulting (was: OT - ugh!) All of the above, including tapping your professional network. Also look at sites such as Guru.com and

Re: Consulting (was: OT - ugh!)

Thanks Mr. ASB :) From: Andrew S. Baker To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 1:17 PM Subject: Re: Consulting (was: OT - ugh!) All of the above, including tapping your professional network. Also look at sites such as Guru.com and

RE: OT - ugh!

rds, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Don Kuhlman [mailto:drkuhl...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 2:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT - ugh! This may be out of scope for the list, but since it's been touched on, do

RE: Infrastructure Specialist defined - was: OT - ugh!

-Original Message- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 2:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Infrastructure Specialist defined - was: OT - ugh! Just curious. We don't see many kilts here in Southern Indiana, and then usually ju

Re: OT - ugh!

mailing list (who is in Alaska this >>week) who waited even longer than I did. :-) >> >>Regards, >> >>Michael B. Smith >>Consultant and Exchange MVP >>http://TheEssentialExchange.com >> >> >>-Original Message- >>From: Maglinger, Paul

Re: Consulting (was: OT - ugh!)

ream coming in at the beginning? > > Don K > > -- > *From:* Michael B. Smith > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Sent:* Monday, February 6, 2012 9:47 AM > > *Subject:* RE: OT - ugh! > > I put off starting my own business for YEARS

RE: Infrastructure Specialist defined - was: OT - ugh!

fined - was: OT - ugh! Well, not to bed, nor while bathing, and not when I'm getting up on my roof to clean the gutters, but other than that, yeah, all the time... Kurt On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 06:37, Maglinger, Paul wrote: > All the time? > > -Original Message- > From: Ku

Re: OT - ugh!

ng? Don K From: Michael B. Smith To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 9:47 AM Subject: RE: OT - ugh! I put off starting my own business for YEARS because I was afraid of what I already knew. :-) Whereas, in retrospect, I wish I'd done it much earlier.

Re: OT - ugh!

> > >Michael B. Smith > >Consultant and Exchange MVP > >http://TheEssentialExchange.com <http://theessentialexchange.com/> > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] > >Sent: Monday, Febr

Re: OT - ugh!

sysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:53:32 + To: NT Issues mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>> Subject: Re: OT - ugh! I ran as a contractor through a managed services company for about six years before taking the plunge myself. Whereas now I

Re: OT - ugh!

ember yet! :) > > >Carl Webster > > Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional > > http://www.CarlWebster.com <http://www.carlwebster.com/> > > From: James Rankin > Reply-To: NT Issues > Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:53:32 + > To: NT Issues > &

Re: Infrastructure Specialist defined - was: OT - ugh!

rt.b...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 4:16 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Infrastructure Specialist defined - was: OT - ugh! > > I wear a kilt, so I'm pretty much exempt from your amendments - > especially the first one... > > Heh. > > O

Re: OT - ugh!

lt-software.com>> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:53:32 + To: NT Issues mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>> Subject: Re: OT - ugh! I ran as a contractor through a managed services company for about six years before taking the plunge myself. Whereas now I find myself counting th

Re: OT - ugh!

Michael B. Smith >Consultant and Exchange MVP >http://TheEssentialExchange.com > > >-Original Message- >From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] >Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 10:28 AM >To: NT System Admin Issues >Subject: RE: OT - ugh! > >I remember re

Re: OT - ugh!

; -Original Message- > From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 10:28 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: OT - ugh! > > I remember reading something awhile back stating that the reason that some > "non-college educated&

Re: OT - ugh!

I wish. I'd have spent most of last year rioting. :-) Sent from my SR-71 Blackbird -Original Message- From: Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 11:17:56 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: RE: OT - ugh! I think I remember reading something

RE: OT - ugh!

I think I remember reading something about that game. Isn't that where, when their team loses, half the fans riot? Subject: Re: OT - ugh! To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com From: kz2...@googlemail.com Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 22:38:36 + I was told once being a Sunderlan

RE: OT - ugh!

I think I remember reading something about that game. Isn't that where, when their team loses, half the fans riot? Subject: Re: OT - ugh! To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com From: kz2...@googlemail.com Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 22:38:36 + I was told once being a Sunderlan

RE: OT - ugh!

Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 10:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - ugh! I remember reading something awhile back stating that the r

RE: OT - ugh!

riginal Message- From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 8:33 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - ugh! No, you don't need a degree to start a billion dollar company, but you do need brains and a lot of hard work. Of course if it's so

  1   2   >