The website is (mostly) not in English! I found Tim's item after some effort...
Timothy W. Cook
Title: Healthcare Information Models & ApplicationsHealthcare
information is full of context. The current design approach to
healthcare information systems (HIS) doesn\'t provide a facili
dation for early bladder cancer has a nice way of
breaking things up.
Standard
Recommended
Opinion
Only the "standard" will be useable in all patients, for at least an
acceptable but finite period in time.
Nandalal Gunaratne
- Original Message
From: Adrian Midgley &l
I do too!
Nandalal Gunaratne MS FRCS MRACS
--- Fred Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your application is sounding more and more
> exciting!! I look forward to your
> release!
>
> -FT
>
> On Dec 19, 2007 8:37 AM, Hemant Shah
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
I have the same question. Is it Linux or Redhat?
nandalal
--- Will Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim,
>
> What is "the most prolific open source platform on
> the planet"???
>
> With best regards,
>
> [wr]
>
> - - - - - - - -
>
> On Apr 16, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
>
> >
> >>>
We must not forget the end user who can contribute
ideas, report bugs and thus feels closer to the
developer and has a sense of belonging to a community
- "our software".
Nandalal
--- Will Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dirk Riehle. "The Economic Motivation of Open Source
> Software:
> Stake
To get a visa we need a formal document to show that
there is a conference with dates and signed by
someone.
Nandalal
--- Molly Cheah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *Visa Requirements for Travel To Malaysia*
>
> Your passport must be valid for at least 6 months...
>
> http://www.imi.gov.my/eng/pe
icular purpose.
Nandalal
--- Tim Churches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> > Karsten,
> >
> > That is true. I suspect OIO library has not been
> > updated for a long time though.
> > Do you know how to set this up? What was used
> re
5:53:22PM -0800, Nandalal
> Gunaratne wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [openhealth] Experimental OSHCA
> catalogue of FOSS application for health and
> healthcare
> >
> >
> > --- Tim Churches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Nandalal Gunaratn
I think a map will be cool. There is a map in one of
the exibit demos, but it does not show up when I go
into it.
Tiddliywiki is a really nice tool. I can add a gui
toolbar to it and make it editable, then anyone can
easily edit it. It is easier than exibit in thay way.
But on the other hand those
David,
You are the best person to advice us on this matter.
What should go into the "open standards in
healthcare?" section?
The list below is what I compiled for starters to be
edited and corrected.
Nandalal
Open Healthcare Framework (OHF) Project
eHealth Standardization Coordination Group (Wor
Tim and David,
I wonder if David is looking at the Tiddlywiki?
Given below is the part of the JSON file and the links
are correct. The CorbaMed link has been corrected.
It is not listed under standards anymore and is under
software applications. Is it necessary to have
application framework as a
--- Tim Churches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> it separates the data from the presentation. Not
> every view has to use
> or display every data element.
>
> Tim C
This is wh
I think Tim can add a home button on the first page
Nandalal
--- Molly Cheah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim,
>
> When I click this Trial SIMILE link, it opens on
> same window and does
> not take me back to the previous page,
> http://www.oshca.org/healthdir/
> Maybe its better to make it ope
Tim,
--- Tim Churches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have quickly put together an experimental OSHCA
> catalogue of FOSS
> application for health and healthcare, using The MIT
> SIMILE Semantic Web
> research lab's fabulous Exhibit and Timeline
> products (open source of
> course).
>
> See http:
If Medsphere OpenVista is to be included in OSHCA,
alongside World Vista, please give me the details that
should be included and if any clauses need to be
mentioned.
Nandalal
--- Tim Churches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fred Trotter wrote:
> > The software in question was not VistA at all. It
>
Thanks Ross!
Due to your question i have come to know the present
state of text mining and NLP. These will give you your
solution I guess.
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1089824&dl=acm&coll=&CFID=15151515&CFTOKEN=6184618
nandalal
--- Will Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear 80n,
>
>
Will,
It is not a good idea to have sensitive information in
free text. If you do, it should not go to "general
circulation", right?
How can one extract such info from free text? One way
is to remove such words from free text files using a
macro of some sort. "FInd and replace" can be used to
re
It was VistA itself I was asking about. Porting it to
Java was being attempted, was it not?
Nandalal
--- Joseph Dal Molin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CPRS is based on Delphi not MUMPSand yes it
> is being ported to
> Java by VA.
>
> Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
&g
e a difficult job?
Nandalal
--- Joseph Dal Molin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It got 95% of the way there and needs more funding
> to complete the work.
> Right now it is in hibernation.
>
> Joseph
>
> Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Th
dea of what it
> is like by going to the online demo that the VA has:
>
> www.va.gov/cprsdemo
>
> Joseph
>
>
> Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> > Does this have a GUI interface? IS there a demo
> online
> > to try out?
> >
> > Nandalal
>
Does this have a GUI interface? IS there a demo online
to try out?
Nandalal
--- Joseph Dal Molin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a couple of important clarifications to
> Bhaskar's post:
>
> > Please note that this VERSION OF THE software has
> not been field tested.
>
> this specific ve
I agree with Tim. The licensing is ambiguous in regard
to open licenses (OSI) and copyleft principles of
FOSS.
However OpenEHR may want to keep this "open" for
change.
The archetypes at least, must be protected from being
commercialised as they are the collaborative work of
many people.
Nandala
can cause confusion and inaccuracy, will
last forever. The correct path is the middle path.
nandalal
--- Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> --- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Beale
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Nandalal Gunaratne wrote
in the
blood or iron?
Nandalal
--- Thomas Beale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> > The power of this approach is hard to appreciate
> >
> >> until you're in a
> >> situation where lots of people have lots of
> things
The power of this approach is hard to appreciate
> until you're in a
> situation where lots of people have lots of things
> they want to
> characterize in a system. It allows non-developers
> to own and
> augment their own notions of what data matters to
> them, without
> altering the underly
This is just the type of discussion we should have in
the May OSHCA Conference!!
"FOSS interoperability - from theory to practice"
Nandalal
--- David Forslund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Churches wrote:
> > Paul wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Dave,
> >>
> >> Our API is built around the standard heal
Klaus,
Most of asia use ICD and other WHO standards. SNOMED
is considered too expensive and too closed. I hope the
new initiative would change that.
Nandalal
--- Klaus Veil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christian,
>
> I'd be happy to contribute something on HL7 and
> would also help to get
> sp
Hi Christian,
You are right on-the-ball here. What the asian
colleagues would want is exactly what you suggested -
intro to the core of the standards and what they mean
in simple short form. They may also want more
interactive hands on stuff regards FOSS apps rather
than talks on them. The thing i
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> > --- Tim Churches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Public health/epidemiology (think avian/pandemic
> >> influenza):
> >>
> >> OpenEpi is a useful tool: http://www.openepi.com/
&g
Hello THomas,
>
> To give you an idea of the kind of thinking that
> could be exposed, here
> is my opinion:
> I think they should be open and freely usable - in
> fact I think the only
> sensible business model for standards development is
> to give them away
> free and charge some money for c
re
OpenEHR is one practical implementation of standards
that we can show case. Therefore let us dicuss how we
are going to collaborate on "testing and improving"
it. Maybe Thomas will be at the OSHCA meeting?
Nandalal
>
> Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> > --- Molly Cheah <[E
--- Molly Cheah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Open Source is also a open standard of software
development! We need to define/re-define these open
standards, remove the obsolete and invoke those of the
future.
As for objective 4, we need to discuss this now rather
than wait. Think big and start smal
work in the Phoenix project.
> The billing and
> scheduling development work done during the Phoenix
> project has all
> been released into the ClearHealth code under a GPL
> copyright.
>
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2007, at 4:38 AM, Nandalal Gunaratne
> wrote:
t; generation of PIDS will result from the current
> EIS RFP from the OMG which is currently
> soliciting responses. The EIS is a joint effort
> of the OMG and HL7. We would like to provide
> an implementation of EIS as part of OpenEMed and
> are soliciting help in anyone interested
--- Tim Churches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The African project OpenMRS (see
> http://openmrs.org/wiki/OpenMRS ) is,
> to my mind, the most exciting open source clinical
> application at
> present, in the field, good technical underpinnings,
> and charging ahead.
>
Thanks Tim for this info, I
Hello Will,
I do not see any MPI projects in the OpenHRE except
the description of four Patient-Data Matching
Software.
The OpenEMed project is somewhat dormant and did not
have a fully developed MPI software based on it's
Person identification service. I am not sure if during
the aborted Phoenix
Hi Will,
The whole song from Bob Dylan is great, and
appropriate.
The article makes me proud to be a FOSS advocate, and
I am proud of all the great people who gave and give
and will give to concepts of software freedom.
Let them who became rich and powerful, prevail for
now, but let us work to s
Done!
:-)
--- Ignacio Valdes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've written an original book review on Marcel
> Gagne's Moving to Free
> Software book on Linux Medical News. Book reviews
> tend to generate a
> lot of traffic for a website but the current queen
> of it all is Digg.
> If
--- David Forslund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think
> EHR applications should be interoperable without
> having to use the same
> underlying code. Given some time and effort I
> would like to show that
> OpenEMed
> can accommodate the OpenEHR specifications.
Since the archetypes are centra
David H Chan, MD, CCFP, MSc, FCFP
> Associate Professor
> Department of Family Medicine
> McMaster University
>
> - Original Message
> From: Nandalal Gunaratne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: openhealth@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, November
I would certainly like to help. Since I am a Surgeon
interested in HIT (rather than a HIT specialist
interested in surgery!), tell me how I could help, and
I most certainly will.
Best regards
Nandalal
--- Thomas Beale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Will Ross wrote:
> >
> > in other words, in my ne
Why not hand over the keeping of the patient records
to patients ( like PING), where clinicians just upload
to this, and they also carry it with them in a storage
format that is secure and easily accessible?
The National Health Card Taiwan
http://www.gi-de.com/portal/page?_pageid=42,55000&_dad=por
s assisting. I believe in a
> distributed
> EMR with control by the patient. Sometimes we
> called
> this a Virtual Medical/Patient Record (about 10
> years ago in a
> journaled publication).
>
> Dave
> Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> >
> > IT would seem to me that,
I presume you mean that holding it at the GP level is
far more stable for the patient?
Admin/manager changes can vary, and their approach to
change as well. THerefore it all depends. As for
change in underwear, this could vary as well, if you
listen to this story :-)
A customs officer was checkin
IT would seem to me that, what you favour is a system
where, all patients will have their EMR with their GPs
and nobody else and nowhere else. What is done in a
hospital encounter, for example a Urological Surgery,
Cardioloical tests, CT scan reports, will be sent to
the GP for inclusion in the EMR
--- Adrian Midgley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>as The Rt Hon Mr
> Anthony Blair MP steps back to being a back bench
> MP, the plan is likely
> to fall apart.
>
I hope not! In the sense that the NHS forgets about
plans for EMR. Maybe a more sensible and practical
approach will result?
Nandalal
>
--- Adrian Midgley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What do they mean exactly by "requests"?
> >
>
> A form, slip of paper, or letter (or at least in
> theory text hammered
> into a terminal) saying "Please do a mammogram on
> this patient". I
> understand in much of the world these are calle
that could
> prompt and print mammogram requests over the 10
> years of our
> surveillance?
What do they mean exactly by "requests"?
Ideally it would be a program which
> would also act as a
> very basic database of patients such that we could
> recall all basic
> details (i.e. Node positives or
Since I am thinking of doing the same thing, it would
be nice if you have a howto (OK! I am lazy!).
Why encrypt the swap partition? Isn't it a risk only
in the unlikely event of it being stolen while it is
on and your son is working on it? Is this your
concern? Is not the swap partition erased whe
. Therefore it will
remain dependent on a commercial product even on
linux! But if it works, this is acceptable in my
opinion, as CPRS itself can be modified by anyone
subsequently.
Nandalal
--- Gregory Woodhouse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2006, at 5:18 AM, Nandalal Gunar
You said:
> As always, critiques, comments and questions are
> welcome.
Are you serious?
If you are, let me request that a document on how to
use this, once installed, with a real example, with
screenshots where necessary be put up. Without this it
is useless. The LiveCD you kindly sent me was no
Thank you for clearing many things. However, the way
VistA is developing and branching out, will create
many problems in the future. I hope World Vista takes
suitable precautions to ensure that future users of
the FOSS version of World VistA, will not get into
difficulties as you have pointed out i
Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 23, 2006, at 8:36 AM, Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
Not being a lawyer, I'll ask a naive question: It's one thing to
choose to license your own work under GPL, but why would anyone think
Thanks Joseph, for the clarification. It is good to know that the value of the
open source model is becoming more accepted and that in the future, GUI based
versions of VistA too, will be open source.
What type of open source licence is likely to be used for these
implementations? "Public Do
Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Indeed it is confusing to have many versions of VistA, but it is even more
worrying as their usage begins. Implementing VistA outside the USA is going to
be quite tricky. Getting a good law firm involved to look into the possible
copyright/patent
I agree with Tim. VistA has a lot going for it, but there are some good fully
FOSS projects that can be developed further. They are build on modern languages
and well established FOSS - like LAMP. The end users are more IT literate now
than at the time VistA started, and would like to be able to
I second what Tim says. Do not think of the politics/politicians of the country concerned, but of the ordinary people of that country, who form the VAST majority too - though wasted and ignored by the media!
;-)
Your expertise is of value to them, not to politicians.
"Tim.Churches" <[EMAIL
I second what Tim says. Do not think of the politics/politicians of the country concerned, but of the ordinary people of that country, who form the WASTE majority!
Your expertise is of value to them.
"Tim.Churches" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Forslund wrote:
> I apologize for bringi
David Forslund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What is happening with the setting up of OSHCA in Malaysia? It has been
quiet for some time now.
It is disturbing to see the Prime Minister of Malaysia shaking hands
with the Hamas terrorist Mahmoud Zahar. What
possible good can come from
Thanks Joseph
nandalal
Joseph Dal Molin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI
Original Message
Subject: [hif-net] Announcing the launch of PLoS Clinical Trials
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 06:55:22 -0400
From: Emma Veitch, UK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: HIF-net - Health In
These should go up on our web site on "How to win clients and influence the corporate customer on FOSS".
nandalal
Rod Roark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday 19 May 2006 09:03 pm, Thomas Beale wrote:
...
> - so you (the customer) are paying for 30% of the total cost, upfront
> for a gene
I think your argument to convince business is pretty good, if they are accepting it.
In the same way we mayed a way to convince them that the use of interoperability also saves them a lot of money in the long term and gives them bargaining power when purchasing software from different vendors
Thus the necessity to inculcate the need for interoperability as the most important part of healthcare IT to politicians. If they insist on it from the top and revise OMG HDTF with the same enthusiasm Mr Bush promotes VistA, things may go in the right direction.
Anyone here on a mailing list
This is another interesting paragraph
"A statement from IBM said the company will engage with industry leaders. But it did not mention whether it will coordinate efforts with the so-called Interoperability Consortiuma group of large IT vendors including IBM, Cisco Systems Inc., Microsoft Cor
Thank you for the detailed explanation. I will tell some people who are into epideomological aspects of healthcare to look at Netepi.
Regards
Nanda Gunaratne
Tim Churches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> Is NetEpi based on EpiInfo or something growi
ICD-10 has tried to be more accurate in making the diagnosis, thereby going into great detail, with the obvious effects of bloat.
The ICD-10 -PCS is taking quite the opposite way of doing things, but could be difficult to get people to use it for this reason. They will not have their favorite
Is NetEpi based on EpiInfo or something growing out of that?? I used EpiInfo it some years ago and can remember writing to the CDC to create a linux version :-)
Regards
Nanda Gunaratne
"Tim.Churches" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ignacio Valdes wrote:
> Linux Apache MySQL PHP server setu
Jason Tan Boon Teck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well anything making the work of an evil mind more difficult is worth it :-)
Total security being a myth.
Nanda
On 5/12/06, Franklin M. Siler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 11, 2006, at 10:22 PM, Jason Tan Boon Teck wro
tence proofs that OMG specs
can be implemented in open source.
It might be possible to implement CPT codes in open source, but not to
be able to deploy it for free. I don't think
open source "necessarily" implies "free". This is the old argument as
to what one
Any thoughts about that statement? Can we actually call a standard open
> if there are limitations
> to its implementation by FOSS?
>
>
> alvin
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Nandalal Gunaratne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
>
naratne
alvin
--- Nandalal Gunaratne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> "Alvin B. Marcelo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are quite right. Interoperability depends in turn on the agreement on standards. Coding
> systems included.
>
James Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is the way it is and multiple licences are necessary depending on the number of users. Maybe things have changed recently?
Nanda Gunaratne
On May 11, 2006, at 8:23 AM, David Forslund wrote:
> In the US (and UK) SNOMED-CT is freely a
"Bhaskar, KS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It has it's benefits, but not a great practical solution, nor safe
> enough, as one may want to assume.
[KSB] Like perfection, absolute security does not exist in this
universe. All we can do is make intelligent trade-offs!
Yes! This tru
David Forslund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The coding system standards in the US have been specified by CHI. We
should share coding systems, but
even more important is to provide mappings between coding systems, since
not everyone will ever use the
same coding system. OSS could lead
"Bhaskar, KS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me take an even stronger position. If you really want to secure
your network of PCs, you should run the OS off a Linux live CD-ROM which
cannot be infected. It is so straightforward to create customized Linux
live CDs, that I see no reason to
"Alvin B. Marcelo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You are quite right. Interoperability depends in turn on the agreement on standards. Coding systems included.
Unfortunately the best nomenclature coding system is SNOMED-CT which is a proprietary product. But I am sure the new versions of the
Jel Coward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
>
Have you got the latest build with the greater granularity of permissions?
OSCAR 2.1.0 is what I am experimenting with.
--
Jel Coward
SPONSO
Jel Coward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
>
Have you got the latest build with the greater granularity of permissions?
OSCAR 2.1.0 is what I am experimenting with.
--
Jel Coward
SPONSO
Nice thoughts!
If you are having Zope on your server i hope you tried Open Infrastructure for Outcomes, which is the best software for research and audit for clinicians you can get!
Torch is another quite "complete" and usable system running on Zope.
I have setup OSCAR on Ubuntu Breezy
Hi David,
Does OSCAR allow patients to keep their own records or access them? Are you hoping to implement something on the lines of PING?
I have installed OSCAR and am trying it out. I installed it on Ubuntu, and I am also documenting things as I go along. As a surgeon I must find a way to
...
Thanks
Nandalal Gunaratne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all,
I'm collating standards (open or otherwise) that are being used in open
source health applications.
I'd appreciate if the developers on the list would explicitly publish what
standards they base their applications on a
Could you please explain the difference between the Templates (there are quite a few of these, but very basic) and the eforms? If one needs to add patient data regarding the procedures they undergo, what is the best approach?
I believe that all the data is stored in the MYSQL database, and PD
Will Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
dear sir,
unfortunately, i believe the record will show that i am qualified to
share the disputation sandbox from this side of the pond. we can't
have california not represented; after all, look who we elected
governor.
Yes! And he will
Joseph Dal Molin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It was Tim Cook who created the OSHCA moniker
and Ignacio has played a great part in the
propogation of openhealth and made most people
aware of the existence of the openhealth list!
nandalal
John,
Yes...a wiki page will be great fo
motion to close the discussion, which is
seconded and passed.
does this "disrupt the process" or is it a legitimate part of the
process? you decide.
[wr]
- - - - - - - -
On Apr 25, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
>
>
> Fred Trotter wrote:
>
> F
LSB 3.1 also incorporates the recently approved ISO standard LSB Core (ISO/IEC 23360) into the standard. The Free Standards Group also has said that Red Hat, Novell, Ubuntu, Asianux and others are all certifying their versions of their operating systems to the LSB, delivering true world-wide cov
Fred Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fred,
There was enough time given for dissent/discussion. Molly asked everyone repeatedly to comment on the issues. We can't wait for ever, therefore a time limit was set, and the FINAL draft was set down. Therfore there was really nothing to disag
Joseph Dal Molin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Will,
Please forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing ;-)
They have not done this before!
Perfection is worth striving for, but it is almost never reachable, Therefore it was agreed by most of us that it was OK to get it
David Forslund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David,
If the OSHCA takes on the task of making the "glue"
* to get FOSS for Health groups to understand the true value of FOSS which is sharing/contributing and collaborating with ideas and code
*to demonstrate the value of interoperability
CHITS but we would hardly
> > > call it standard. (It takes a global community to create a standard?)
> > >
> > > Does OSHCA have a framework of some sort for this kind of health
> > > software object interchange? That's where gap is m
ant to them.
www.oemr.org
-- Rod
www.sunsetsystems.com
On Monday 17 April 2006 08:58 am, Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
>
> Andrew Schamess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
> There are several open source products but I doubt if any one of them can
> d
> cooperation I had expected from OSHCA 'products' before. And that's
> where FOSS is strong and gains an edge over proprietary products.
>
>
> --- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Nandalal Gunaratne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
>
And that's
where FOSS is strong and gains an edge over proprietary products.
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Nandalal Gunaratne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> alvinbmarcelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This looks like a very good s
Andrew Schamess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew,
There are several open source products but I doubt if any one of them can do
all that you ask.
LAMP based ones include OpenMed, FreeMed, MirrorMed and ClearHealth. All look
good but still not able to give you what you need.
JAVA bas
alvinbmarcelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This looks like a very good system. Congratulations!
I will try this and introduce it to my colleagues in community health. Maybe
some of them are already aware of it.
Nandalal
Hello all. This is Alvin Marcelo (formerly of NLM) re-subscribin
"Tim.Churches" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tim,
All the following work with Firefox - in that i am taken to the correct URL!
What were you trying to point out here?
Nandalal
That leads to a whole genre of single word, non-deterministic URLS in
Firefox. Try these (in Firefox, results
"Tim.Churches" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You are quite right, TIm. This is a funny thing with Firefox. I am using 1.0.7
maybe they ahve sorted things in 1.5.1, hopefully!
Nandalal
Tim.Churches wrote:
> Nandalal Gunaratne wrote:
> > It is indeed mos
It is indeed most encouraging to see such developments. When I clicked the
"screenshots" i was taken to the Microsoft web site!!!
Your link should be
http://www.mirrormed.org/fb/
Not
http://http//www.mirrormed.org/fb/
Regards
nandalal
Ignacio Valdes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The
Philippe AMELINE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Joseph,
Should we envision Oshca the path to success through a bottom up or top
down evolution.
If the mother organization is already well know or strongly established,
you have better have lightweight branches... just like franchises, as
It seems to me that Fred is going to review just these, and others are supposed
to chiop in with some reviews or part of reviews of any other EMRs worth
talking about.
Open VistA remains to be reviewed and OSCAR.
Zope based SPIRIT? and OIO are two others that come to mind. While the ones
r
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
