Girts Zeltins wrote:
I want to say that Solaris must be as NetBSD and must be available for all
platforms.
I don't think you will find too many who would disagree with you.
I would note, however, that it took several painful years to evolve
a multi-platform NetBSD from BSD's initial Net/2 dum
I think, this is _not_ good idea. Solaris = Sparc = Best power,
nothing else. AMD and Intel are exceptions. :))
For me is _now_ Solaris the best operating system.
best regards
On 5/31/07, Girts Zeltins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all,
I want to start discussion about one important thing.
>
>
> Glynn Foster wrote:
>
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > Here's the project proposal that should have been
> out a long while
> > back (apologies, I'm happy to take the blame on
> this one). Before
> > anyone gets too caught up in how little the
> proposal actually
> > covers, I intend to follow up
Hello all,
I want to start discussion about one important thing. I want to say that
Solaris must be as NetBSD and must be available for all platforms. This is idea
which come to my mind some time ago and now I want to ask all Solaris funs to
start discuss about this.
If Sun Microsystems will g
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
If you want to create an OpenSolaris reference distribution, or any
distribution that advertises itself as having that status,
Why does Indiana have to meet these requirements when Nexenta, Belinix,
MartUX, Schillix, SX, and all the other OS.o distros don't?
Why are y
Hello,
Yes, this is bad thing and one of biggest Sun Microsystems mistakes. I already
talk about lot of mistakes in Solaris recently and I want to say:
Sun Microsystems will lose lots of Solaris users if they will use Java in
installation system and in graphical desktop. There is no need any Jav
For background on what this is, see:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=24416#24416
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=25200#25200
=
opensolaris-discuss 04/16 - 04/30
=
Size of all threads du
Glynn Foster wrote:
Hey,
Here's the project proposal that should have been out a long while
back (apologies, I'm happy to take the blame on this one). Before
anyone gets too caught up in how little the proposal actually
covers, I intend to follow up with my thoughts if and when the
proje
Francois Saint-Jacques wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:56:47AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> Hopefully we'll start having some excellent productive
>> discussions over the coming weeks.
>
> Public or internal discussions? I'm curious to hear the juicy
> details.
Public.
For exam
Attempted to reproduce:-
“Compiz on Solaris x86 - Eye Candy for Solaris’s Desktop”
http://linux.wordpress.com/tag/linuxunixos/5-solaris-based/
>Secondly you need at least Solaris Express Build 60. It should also work on
>
61 and 62.
Have SXCE build 62 (64 bit) up and running
>T
I assume that you mean inappropriate line breaks are being placed in
the text. If so can you send me a sample textfile, so I can see what
you are experiencing.
brian
On 5/30/07, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe someone can offer some suggestions to resolve this issue that I'm sure
I'm not
Hey,
Francois Saint-Jacques wrote:
> 1. 6 month is WAY too short in my opinion. There is nothing more painfull
> than upgrading Fedora core 1 to 6 or Ubuntu abc to xyz while dist-upgrading
> 3-4
> releases. Update process *should not* take more than 3 hours. I understand
> this is may be impossib
Maybe someone can offer some suggestions to resolve this issue that I'm sure
I'm not to the first to encounter.
Sending text fiels with mailx and they show up in Outlook wrapped. I ran the
unix2dos on the files before emailing, but they are still wrapping. the new
line chars were replaced with
1.4 Involvement
There is a strong intention for this to be a community grass roots
project, with open contribution. We hope for this project to be
consensus driven, though ultimately the project leads will need
to dictate direction if that proves unfeasible for delivering
a ti
Although I don't agree with the requirement of a Sun Employee to have
final sayso on decisions, I would like to voice my support for this
project.
Let us begin discussions in an appropriate list to flesh out proposal details.
brian
___
opensolaris-disc
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:04:46PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
> No where did I mention a reference distribution - I agree, we're not
> necessarily at that point yet. Maybe we can schedule a discussion at
> next week's OGB meeting?
We can, but I think it would be premature. First, I was making
as
Hey,
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> If you want to create an OpenSolaris reference distribution, or any
> distribution that advertises itself as having that status, some type
> of community-wide approval will be required. It seems likely that the
> OGB is the appropriate body to consider such a prop
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:02:16PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
> Including a list of leaders is easily doable, though I was worried
> that it might alienate the people who are keen to be involved - or
> those within other projects that are doing a lot of the work
> building the technology. If it's
On May 31, 2007, at 00:37, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:24:40PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
The process requires that this be sent to one or more community
groups
for sponsorship consideration - have you sent it to the
Distributions
an
Hello Glynn, Ian and others,
I am not active on this list, but I started following your thread this
weekend because I'm really intrigued by the Indiana project. My first
experience with OpenSolaris was on Nexenta, which is a quite nice
distribution.
Since Indiana is aimed at attracting the Linux
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:24:03AM +0100, Alan Burlison wrote:
> Or they could just ignore it entirely and put their projects on
> SourceForge...
They could do that with endorsed projects, too. Hosting services are
artifacts, not the main reason to seek endorsement. In fact, although
7.10 requ
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:30:08PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
Looks like I've missed a set of meeting minutes - I'll try and write up based on
the recording as soon as possible.
No. You published a fine set of minutes for this meeting. They're at
http://mail.opens
Hi,
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:30:08PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
>
>> Looks like I've missed a set of meeting minutes - I'll try and write up
>> based on
>> the recording as soon as possible.
>
> No. You published a fine set of minutes for this meeting. They're at
Hi,
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:41:52AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
>
>> Here's the project proposal that should have been out a long while back
>> (apologies, I'm happy to take the blame on this one). Before anyone gets too
>> caught up in how little the proposal actual
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:30:08PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
> Looks like I've missed a set of meeting minutes - I'll try and write up based
> on
> the recording as soon as possible.
No. You published a fine set of minutes for this meeting. They're at
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/og
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:44:13PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
> > It also would seem to directly counteract any desire to be a binary
> > distribution named "OpenSolaris" given it would be under the sole
> > control of somebody other than OpenSolaris.
>
> I agree with you in principle..however..
> Anne wrote:
>> Does anyone know if Solaris 10 has the ability to index all of it's
>> contents and those contents are available for query? (Akin to Red Hat's
>> "locate" and "updatedb" features.) The "find" command is so sllow
>
> Those aren't Red Hat features, but features of the GNU findut
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:57:32PM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> >On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:41:52AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
> >
> >The process requires that this be sent to one or more community groups
> >for sponsorship consideration...
>
> I
Alan Burlison wrote:
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
I take it that means either I missed something (if so, help please)
or the
OGB is behind on publishing meeting minutes...
I think this is about more than meeting minutes. If there is a new
policy, it seems there should be email to at least the -a
Richard Lowe wrote:
> Brian Gupta wrote:
>>> 1.4 Involvement
>>>
>>> There is a strong intention for this to be a community grass roots
>>> project, with open contribution. We hope for this project to be
>>> consensus driven, though ultimately the project leads will need
>>> to di
Brian Gupta wrote:
1.4 Involvement
There is a strong intention for this to be a community grass roots
project, with open contribution. We hope for this project to be
consensus driven, though ultimately the project leads will need
to dictate direction if that proves unfeasible for
On Mon, 28 May 2007 23:40:08 +0200, "Martin Bochnig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
>
> > > "Ian Murdock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If OpenSolaris/Indiana moves to an Ubuntu/MacOS X
> > > style "always log in
> >
> > Is this an announcement? And what is this OpenSolaris/Indiana? A nam
Hi,
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
> Eric Boutilier wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I know we approved it...
>>
>>
>> I take it that means either I missed something (if so, help please) or
>> the
>> OGB is behind on publishing meeting minutes...
>
> I think this is about m
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:56:47AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Hopefully we'll start having some excellent productive
> discussions over the coming weeks.
Public or internal discussions? I'm curious to hear the juicy
details.
--
Francois Saint-Jacques
http://www.networkdump.com
__
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
I take it that means either I missed something (if so, help please) or
the
OGB is behind on publishing meeting minutes...
I think this is about more than meeting minutes. If there is a new
policy, it seems there should be email to at least the -announce alias
and new t
Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
I know we approved it...
I take it that means either I missed something (if so, help please) or the
OGB is behind on publishing meeting minutes...
I think this is about more than meeting minutes. If there is a new
policy
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
I know we approved it...
I take it that means either I missed something (if so, help please) or the
OGB is behind on publishing meeting minutes...
Eric
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-dis
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:41:52AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
The process requires that this be sent to one or more community groups
for sponsorship consideration...
I don't agree. Here's how I'd put it: "The almost-but-not-quite-yet OGB
blessed p
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:24:40PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> >The process requires that this be sent to one or more community groups
> >for sponsorship consideration - have you sent it to the Distributions
> >and Packaging Group? The Constitution and OGB/2007/00
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
The process requires that this be sent to one or more community groups
for sponsorship consideration - have you sent it to the Distributions
and Packaging Group? The Constitution and OGB/2007/001 require any
project proposal to come from a Group.
Are we actually follo
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:41:52AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
> Here's the project proposal that should have been out a long while back
> (apologies, I'm happy to take the blame on this one). Before anyone gets too
> caught up in how little the proposal actually covers, I intend to follow up
> wi
Anne stated:
Hey,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At some point in time, it would be good if people inside Sun
> would come to the opensolaris community with half baked
> ideas for projects, rather than fully fledged ideas, so that
> the community could participate in the discussion about
> what the project should
> UNIX admin wrote:
>
> Other people have addressed the other issues you
> raised, I'll address
> this one:
>
> > I'm thinking that Java failed to deliver on the
> promise of "write
> > once, run anywhere". Java programs developed on
> Windows do not, up to
> > this present day, work on Solaris
UNIX admin wrote:
Don't you worry one bit - there's pah-lenty of Java stuff out there that
doesn't work WITHOUT code changes.
So badly written Java apps are obviously the fault of Java, just like
drink-drivers are obviously all Ford's fault. How stupid of me.
Now I don't care what caused
Hey,
Here's the project proposal that should have been out a long while back
(apologies, I'm happy to take the blame on this one). Before anyone gets too
caught up in how little the proposal actually covers, I intend to follow up with
my thoughts if and when the project alias gets created - I'd li
Anne wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Does anyone know if Solaris 10 has the ability to index all of it's contents
> and those contents are available for query? (Akin to Red Hat's "locate" and
> "updatedb" features.) The "find" command is so sllow
Actually I was making some research in this area a few mo
UNIX admin stated:
< > Differentiate between language, platform (and then,
< > especially, its implementation) and api.
<
< Why?
<
< > Fluent in JAVA?
<
< Not any more. I was formally educated in it though. Java and Swing, threaded
programming.
< That was years ago though, and not an experience
The key thing at the end of this quote should have cut the debate before it
started:
> As has been repeatedly discussed here, the current
> memory requirements
> of the developer release installer are an artifact of
> its hurried
> implementation (eg 2 jvms). This will not continue
> to be the ca
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Anne wrote:
> > Does anyone know if Solaris 10 has the ability to index all of it's contents
> > and those contents are available for query? (Akin to Red Hat's "locate" and
> > "updatedb" features.) The "find" command is so sllow
>
> Those aren't
Interesting! All these years of using them and I never knew that. Wonder why
SUN hasn't bothered to include it (as Red Hat did) in their installs?
Thanks for the great info!
Anne
-Original Message-
From: Alan Coopersmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 6:10 PM
> Differentiate between language, platform (and then,
> especially, its implementation) and api.
Why?
> Fluent in JAVA?
Not any more. I was formally educated in it though. Java and Swing, threaded
programming.
That was years ago though, and not an experience I care to repeat.
> And the other t
Anne wrote:
Does anyone know if Solaris 10 has the ability to index all of it's
contents and those contents are available for query? (Akin to Red Hat's
"locate" and "updatedb" features.) The "find" command is so sllow
Those aren't Red Hat features, but features of the GNU findutils which
y
Hi All
Does anyone know if Solaris 10 has the ability to index all of it's contents
and those contents are available for query? (Akin to Red Hat's "locate" and
"updatedb" features.) The "find" command is so sllow
Thank you
Anne
___
opensolaris-d
> Of course using the 'glass half empty' model would
> resort to you getting 32-bit Oracle OCI libs instead.
Quite right. I've meanwhile managed to locate Oracle 10.1.0.3, old, but 32-bit.
That ought to do the trick.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
The first option on the post-boot menu (Solaris Express Developer Edition)
requires 768MB of memory. All other options only require 512MB of memory.
Choose one of those options, and you should be good to go.
Cheers
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
UNIX admin wrote:
Other people have addressed the other issues you raised, I'll address
this one:
I'm thinking that Java failed to deliver on the promise of "write
> once, run anywhere". Java programs developed on Windows do not, up to
> this present day, work on Solaris;
That is incorrect.
Try the link below:
http://cooltools.sunsource.net/coolstack/
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 30/05/07, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As has been repeatedly discussed here, the current
> memory requirements
> of the developer release installer are an artifact of
> its hurried
> implementation (eg 2 jvms). This will not continue
> to be the case.
I just can't believe Sun con
>> Solaris 11 still run in 256MB just fine, it's just
>> the installer which
>> wants to copy X and Java to ramdisk which is costing
>> so much.
>
> X ok - but why Java??? I never quite understood that ...
>
>> Use "vanilla install" without graphics and it should
>> be fine.
>
> What do you mean?
Now there's a way to make oneself marketable in the "street corner programmer"
business.
Actually Java is the primary language used to teach object oriented
programming concepts today. (At the university level)
No. Every sysadmin I've ever met, and every system engineer I've ever met for tha
> Solaris 11 still run in 256MB just fine, it's just
> the installer which
> wants to copy X and Java to ramdisk which is costing
> so much.
X ok - but why Java??? I never quite understood that ...
> Use "vanilla install" without graphics and it should
> be fine.
What do you mean? Is this an ins
> > As has been repeatedly discussed here, the current
> > memory requirements
> > of the developer release installer are an artifact of
> > its hurried
> > implementation (eg 2 jvms). This will not continue
> > to be the case.
>
> I just can't believe Sun continues to push such a crappy technol
> > Then try to use rxvt.
>
> What is(are) the advantage(s) of rxvt over xterm?
Don't you claim to be such a friend of man pages?
Btw, as I added, take mrxvt, not rxvt.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>> sorry, missed that .. the S/N ratio here can often be ... well you know.
> You could help that by having installation-related conversations on
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
oops .. sorry .. away I go to the correct maillist :-\
dc
___
opensolaris-discuss mai
> I have at least three textbooks here on Java
> programming in front of me and
> I actually went back to University of Toronto for a
> semester to study Java
> programming. Sort of a super fast way to learn this
> technology.
Now there's a way to make oneself marketable in the "street corner pro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At some point in time, it would be good if people inside Sun
would come to the opensolaris community with half baked
ideas for projects, rather than fully fledged ideas, so that
the community could participate in the discussion about
what the project should be about rathe
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
controllers, terribly simple graphic
Thanks, Dave. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to
get you set up.
Eric
On Fri, 25 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Summary:
Provide source code for the Emulex Fibre Channel device driver that
operates in the Leadville environment.
Overview:
We propose the creation of a new
>> As has been repeatedly discussed here, the current
>> memory requirements
>> of the developer release installer are an artifact of
>> its hurried
>> implementation (eg 2 jvms). This will not continue
>> to be the case.
>
> I just can't believe Sun continues to push such a crappy technology lik
> Then try to use rxvt.
What is(are) the advantage(s) of rxvt over xterm?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> As has been repeatedly discussed here, the current
> memory requirements
> of the developer release installer are an artifact of
> its hurried
> implementation (eg 2 jvms). This will not continue
> to be the case.
I just can't believe Sun continues to push such a crappy technology like Java
a
>
>>I think that the installer will still fail even in text mode.
>
> 512MB will work.
>
> Even 256MB works but requires a shrunk miniroot (I generally make one which
> is only 64MB in size as opposed to the standard 170MB; the latter gives
> precious little room on a 256MB system)
>
> Casper
>
s
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> [...]
>> Hello Moinak :
>>
>>I am working my way through a few Sun blueprint docs and trying to put
>> together a small bootable CDROM prototype that will allow me to pkg-get
>> all of the rest of the regular SUNW packages as well as a pile of CSW
>> packages. I figur
Good point. It's a solaris 10 box, T1000.
Think it's hardware? Ouch. No warranty!
-Original Message-
From: Bart Smaalders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 2:32 PM
To: Anne
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 error VOLTAG
Dennis Clarke wrote:
[...]
Hello Moinak :
I am working my way through a few Sun blueprint docs and trying to put
together a small bootable CDROM prototype that will allow me to pkg-get
all of the rest of the regular SUNW packages as well as a pile of CSW
packages. I figure this sort of thing
>
>>I think that the installer will still fail even in text mode.
>
> 512MB will work.
>
> Even 256MB works but requires a shrunk miniroot (I generally make one which
> is only 64MB in size as opposed to the standard 170MB; the latter gives
> precious little room on a 256MB system)
64MB ? perfect
Glynn Foster wrote:
Hi,
Eric Boutilier wrote:
I can't see how it makes sense for the reference distro of
a community project to be a Sun internal project.
Who said anything about a Sun internal project?
I too am under the impression that the design and blessing of an
O
>I think that the installer will still fail even in text mode.
512MB will work.
Even 256MB works but requires a shrunk miniroot (I generally make one which
is only 64MB in size as opposed to the standard 170MB; the latter gives
precious little room on a 256MB system)
Casper
> Glenn Lagasse wrote:
>> * Dennis Clarke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>>> I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
>>> at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
>>> and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SC
It looks like a power or hardware issue (MB or PS probably). Call your support
provider and get the PS replaced.
Brett
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Anne wrote:
Hi All
I received this error:
"VOLTAGE_SENSOR at MB/V_+3V3STBY has exceeded low soft shutdown threshold"
It immediately shuts down my entire system.
I looked at Sun.com for answers. Everything they threw at me, hasn't proved
fruitful.
Any ideas on how to fix this error?
Perhaps
>>Am I to understand that the x86 miniroot on there will fill up all of my
>>RAM and still need more? Gee. Time for a new machine I guess but this
>>one won't die and it runs Solaris 10 just fine.
>>
>>So then, whats the minimal system spec that Solaris 11 is shooting for?
>>
>
> Solaris 11 stil
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* Dennis Clarke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
controllers
>I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
>at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
>and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
>controllers, terribly simple graphics and no sound. It just works.[1]
>
>I
> * Dennis Clarke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>> I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
>> at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
>> and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
>> controllers, terribl
Hi All
I received this error:
"VOLTAGE_SENSOR at MB/V_+3V3STBY has exceeded low soft shutdown threshold"
It immediately shuts down my entire system.
I looked at Sun.com for answers. Everything they threw at me, hasn't proved
fruitful.
Any ideas on how to fix this error?
Thank you
Anne
_
* Dennis Clarke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
> at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
> and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
> controllers, terribly simpl
Bart Smaalders writes:
> As has been repeatedly discussed here, the current memory requirements
> of the developer release installer are an artifact of its hurried
> implementation (eg 2 jvms). This will not continue to be the case.
It's also true that it's an artifact of upgrading in the slow a
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
>> at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
>> and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
>> controllers, terribly simple graphics and no
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
controllers, terribly simple graphics and no sound. It ju
I was shocked to see that my old old trusty HP Kayak XU tower was finally
at a point where it can not install Solaris. I have run Solaris 8 and 9
and 10 on it for years and years. It has two DVD burners and three SCSI
controllers, terribly simple graphics and no sound. It just works.[1]
I burned
Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Gueven Bay wrote:
So, the presentation was held. All the people there learned what
Project Indiana is.
Can someone write in some short sentences what Mr. Murdock told
you,please?
...
The core draft of their idea, which they
Hello,
Well, that isn't bad news. There are a few ways to go
about getting the 64-bit versions of those products.
If you like to 'roll your own' packages then get the
stats on how the Oracle libs were compiled and build
accordingly for proper linkage.
Of course using the 'glass half empty' model
We are working on an automated System Inventory and Data Center
automation Framework. It is currently in planning stage. If anyone is
interested in contributing please let me know.
Could everyone please review this list, and let me know if there data
fields that are important to youe environment
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Gueven Bay wrote:
So, the presentation was held. All the people there learned what Project
Indiana is.
Can someone write in some short sentences what Mr. Murdock told you,please?
...
The core draft of their idea, which they plan to refine with com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I've managed to compile the latest PHP (5.2.2) against the Solaris-bundled
Apache2, MySQL, and PostgreSQL. And with Sun Studio compilers to boot, using
"-xO4 -xprefetch=auto -xarch=generic -xipo=2 -R/..."
However, I'd also like to compile and link against Oracle OCI, so that I have
support for
Girts Zeltins wrote:
Hello,
How I must correctly to use pstack command to make report of CD Player
application crash?
What I must write in Terminal?
pstack core ( assuming that CD player application crash available as
filename 'core' in current directory ).
Thanks
P.S.M.Swamiji
Thank Y
99 matches
Mail list logo
