http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/conary-eval/files/
New test packages for x86:
# ls -al /pkgs total 6368 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 9 Oct 24 02:20 .
drwxr-xr-x 30 bochnig other 48 Oct 24 02:17 ..
* rw-r—r— 1 bochnig other 18504 Oct 24 02:18
EXTRACTTHISIN_YourHOMEDIR.tar.bz2
* rw-r—r—
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> The manifest is defined in /var/svc/manifest/network/rpc/rstat.xml
> Trye to see if you can start the default exec_method from the cmd line, such
> as:
>
> /usr/lib/netsvc/rstat/rpc.rstatd
>
>
Yes, that did start it. Odd that the "correct" method failed and gave
no indi
alan pae wrote:
> Are we seeing the end of the line for doing CD installs and therefore
> we can assume that going forward that it will be DVD's only?
There is no plan to end CD installs long term, AFAIK. However, I also
not sure when they will be returning.
Derek
>
> thanks,
> alan
> --
> This
> I'm not a developer, just a Sys Admin with an appreciation for good
> technology. Not communicating with the community is quite off putting.
I agree, OPENSOLARIS is a misleading name at times
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris
Are we seeing the end of the line for doing CD installs and therefore we can
assume that going forward that it will be DVD's only?
thanks,
alan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensola
+1
On 10/24/08, William Kucharski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So if there is sufficient interest in a MIPS project, I would be happy to
> get
> the ball rolling by formally proposing the creation of such a project under
> the
> Emerging Platforms CG.
>
> I'd just need to know the charter and who
So if there is sufficient interest in a MIPS project, I would be happy to get
the ball rolling by formally proposing the creation of such a project under the
Emerging Platforms CG.
I'd just need to know the charter and who wants to be the project leads.
William Kucharski
__
The manifest is defined in /var/svc/manifest/network/rpc/rstat.xml
Trye to see if you can start the default exec_method from the cmd line, such as:
/usr/lib/netsvc/rstat/rpc.rstatd
Also verify its deps are running well, e.g. svc:/network/rpc/bind
%martin
_
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> On 10/23/08, Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The service won't start and there isn't a reason:
>>
>> svcs -xv svc:/network/rpc/rstat:default
>> svc:/network/rpc/rstat:default (kernel statistics server)
>> State: maintenance since Thu Oct 23 20:25:31 2008
>> R
the error message should have read "use crle, linux-man"
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The error msg came, because options need to go last into the cmd line:
>
> # LD_PRELOAD=/tmp/y/a.out conary update tuxpaint --resolve
>
Derek,
Thanks for the update.
Do you think something could be posted to announce to let everyone know?
Cheers,
Matt
On 23 Oct 2008, at 17:19, Derek Cicero wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
>> Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
>>> Shawn Walker schrieb:
I'm pretty sure that one-line update would be, "
no.
Is there no error log in /etc/svc or syslog?
%martin
On 10/23/08, Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The service won't start and there isn't a reason:
>
> svcs -xv svc:/network/rpc/rstat:default
> svc:/network/rpc/rstat:default (kernel statistics server)
> State: maintenance since Thu
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Thai Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to port a linux app to OpenSolaris OS. There is a API used in
> linux codes that I don't know how to port to OpenSolaris:
>
> ioctl(fileFD, FIBMAP, &FsBlock)
>
> Any one pleases help, tell me how to do t
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:51:20 -0500 Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> First of all, with OpenSolaris 2008.x, I think you'll see far more
>> software packaged, and secondly, far more of it will be up-to-date.
>
> Yes, b
On 10/23/08 9:19 AM, Derek Cicero wrote:
> There were a number of problems with 100 and it had to be re-spun. Due
> to the timing it would have come out right around the time of 101, so
> they punted.
>
> 101 is due next Thursday.
>
> I think the issue is simply that there is delay as the mail gets
The service won't start and there isn't a reason:
svcs -xv svc:/network/rpc/rstat:default
svc:/network/rpc/rstat:default (kernel statistics server)
State: maintenance since Thu Oct 23 20:25:31 2008
Reason: Restarter svc:/network/inetd:default gave no explanation.
See: http://sun.com/msg/SMF-80
Building src inside conary, sample output:
# conary emerge --no-deps zlib:source
+ Methods called:
Zlib.setup
+ Building [EMAIL PROTECTED]:devel[]
warning: Could not find the following troves needed to cook this recipe:
bash:runtime
binutils:devellib
binutils:lib
binutils:runtime
bzip2:runtime
c
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all, with OpenSolaris 2008.x, I think you'll see far more software
> packaged, and secondly, far more of it will be up-to-date.
That may be, but I have been hearing that for the better part of a
decade, so I'll no
Hi,
I am trying to port a linux app to OpenSolaris OS. There is a API used in
linux codes that I don’t know how to port to OpenSolaris:
ioctl(fileFD, FIBMAP, &FsBlock)
Any one pleases help, tell me how to do this, find out a FileSystemBlock of the
offset in a file, in OpenSolaris.
Many thank
Last I checked, today's thursday after a uploadless friday.
accordingly you literally cannot get any later without encroaching on
the following week's build.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
>> Shawn Walker schrieb:
>>> I'm prett
Matt Wilby wrote:
> Derek,
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Do you think something could be posted to announce to let everyone know?
Yes, I just did.
Derek
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matt
>
>
> On 23 Oct 2008, at 17:19, Derek Cicero wrote:
>
>> Shawn Walker wrote:
>>> Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
Sh
On 10/23/08 9:17 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
> Stephen Lau wrote:
>> On 10/23/08 8:58 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
>>> Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
Shawn Walker schrieb:
> I'm pretty sure that one-line update would be, "it hasn't been
> released
> because it's not ready yet." :-)
>
A
Paul Gress wrote:
> The way I see it, is they stated they would have gnome 24 in release 101
> and they are fixing the font problems after removing numerous fonts and
> installing freely available fonts. So it must be taking a little longer
> then expected to complete these tasks. This is al
Shawn Walker wrote:
> Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
>> Shawn Walker schrieb:
>>> I'm pretty sure that one-line update would be, "it hasn't been released
>>> because it's not ready yet." :-)
>>>
>> And what about a schedule? Something like 'We hope to have it ready by
>> next Friday.'?
>
> There is a
Stephen Lau wrote:
> On 10/23/08 8:58 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
>> Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
>>
>>> Shawn Walker schrieb:
>>>
I'm pretty sure that one-line update would be, "it hasn't been released
because it's not ready yet." :-)
>>> And what about a schedule? Som
On 10/23/08 8:58 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
> Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
>
>> Shawn Walker schrieb:
>>
>>> I'm pretty sure that one-line update would be, "it hasn't been released
>>> because it's not ready yet." :-)
>>>
>>>
>> And what about a schedule? Something like 'We hope to have
Shawn Walker schrieb:
> Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
>> Shawn Walker schrieb:
>>> I'm pretty sure that one-line update would be, "it hasn't been
>>> released because it's not ready yet." :-)
>>>
>>
>> And what about a schedule? Something like 'We hope to have it ready by
>> next Friday.'?
>
> There i
Just from my point of view, I've seen quite a bit of push from Sun
sales guys about 'Open Storage'.
If Sun are touting OpenSolaris as the OS for this low cost DIY
storage platform, they won't do themselves any favors by delaying
releases without explanation.
It can't be hard to write a one
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:51:20 -0500 Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all, with OpenSolaris 2008.x, I think you'll see far more
> software packaged, and secondly, far more of it will be up-to-date.
Yes, but will it be packaged in usable form, or will it be configured
to work on a
Indeed. It's all good stuff.
Just wanted to find out when the next release is due
Steve - Is your example just an example? :-)
Cheers,
Matt
On 23 Oct 2008, at 16:27, Stephen Lau wrote:
> On 10/23/08 8:06 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
>> What some of the corporate sponsors for the community cho
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:16:03 +0200
"Martin Bochnig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I would venture to guess that a significant majority o
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:28:13 -0500
Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:49:36 PDT "Richard L. Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>> I'd much rather see a ports type implementation than
> >>> an rpm
> >>> implementation - particularly
Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
> Shawn Walker schrieb:
>> I'm pretty sure that one-line update would be, "it hasn't been released
>> because it's not ready yet." :-)
>>
>
> And what about a schedule? Something like 'We hope to have it ready by
> next Friday.'?
There is a schedule:
http://opensolaris
Stephen Lau wrote:
> On 10/23/08 8:06 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
>> What some of the corporate sponsors for the community choose to do with
>> their products and trademarks is their rightful decision and community
>> members should not expect to have control over them.
>>
> Very true... however I
Shawn Walker schrieb:
>
> I'm pretty sure that one-line update would be, "it hasn't been released
> because it's not ready yet." :-)
>
And what about a schedule? Something like 'We hope to have it ready by
next Friday.'?
The way it is right now, I get the impression only three or four people
a
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moinak Ghosh wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/23/08 8:06 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
What some of the corporate sponsors for the community choose to
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 10/23/08 8:06 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
>>> What some of the corporate sponsors for the community choose to do with
>>> their products and trademarks is their rightful decision and community
>>> member
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/23/08 8:06 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
>> What some of the corporate sponsors for the community choose to do with
>> their products and trademarks is their rightful decision and community
>> members should not expect to hav
On 10/23/08 8:34 AM, Matt Wilby wrote:
> Indeed. It's all good stuff.
>
> Just wanted to find out when the next release is due
>
> Steve - Is your example just an example? :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matt
Yup, t'was purely an example. I'm not at Sun, so I have no insight as
to why it's delayed eithe
Matt Wilby schrieb:
> No note explaining the delay. Not very 'open' is it?
>
> b101 on consolidation doesn't contain all the files either.
>
> Not comparing Opensolaris with Linux or BSD for a minute, but at least with
> something like OpenSUSE you get a basic explanation for delays in releases
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Bochnig wrote:
>>
>> Sun *is* talking to the community, simply because they consider
>> themselves (their exclusive employees) to constitute the "community".
>>
>> So YOU or I have no right to complain.
>>
>> See my d
On 10/23/08 8:06 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
> What some of the corporate sponsors for the community choose to do with
> their products and trademarks is their rightful decision and community
> members should not expect to have control over them.
>
Very true... however I don't think Matt was expres
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Bochnig wrote:
>>
>> Sun *is* talking to the community, simply because they consider
>> themselves (their exclusive employees) to constitute the "community".
>>
>> So YOU or I have no right to complain.
>>
>> See my d
Matt Wilby wrote:
> No note explaining the delay. Not very 'open' is it?
>
> b101 on consolidation doesn't contain all the files either.
>
> Not comparing Opensolaris with Linux or BSD for a minute, but at least with
> something like OpenSUSE you get a basic explanation for delays in releases.
>
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Sun *is* talking to the community, simply because they consider
> themselves (their exclusive employees) to constitute the "community".
>
> So YOU or I have no right to complain.
>
> See my distro generator, THEY DON'T CARE.
> NO INTEREST whatsoever.
> 0xFF other examples.
Sun *is* talking to the community, simply because they consider
themselves (their exclusive employees) to constitute the "community".
So YOU or I have no right to complain.
See my distro generator, THEY DON'T CARE.
NO INTEREST whatsoever.
0xFF other examples.
I'm a stupid developer and sysadmin
Fredrich Maney wrote:
> I would submit that in the desktop realm, you would be correct.
> However, in my experience in the server realm, custom builds are
> pretty common. For example, until very recently (like the last 2
> years), I've rarely seen anyone run the Sun provided BIND, Sendmail or
> Ap
No note explaining the delay. Not very 'open' is it?
b101 on consolidation doesn't contain all the files either.
Not comparing Opensolaris with Linux or BSD for a minute, but at least with
something like OpenSUSE you get a basic explanation for delays in releases.
I'm not a developer, just a
There is a good argument a certain widely used OS from Redmond is a form of
malware:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/12/monocultures_an.html
When thinking of Windows one is reminded of Mr Smith from the Matrix reflecting
on humans behaving like cancer. It is not accident that Windows
I would submit that in the desktop realm, you would be correct.
However, in my experience in the server realm, custom builds are
pretty common. For example, until very recently (like the last 2
years), I've rarely seen anyone run the Sun provided BIND, Sendmail or
Apache daemons on production serve
A friendly reminder of tonight's meeting.
We have some giveaways we're raffling off.
Everyone is welcome, on all systems, OpenSolaris, Linux, and FreeBSD, come
one come all.
Refer to my blog for latest info, and see the Wiki for info as well.
My blog:
http://blogs.sun.com/aland/
Wiki:
http:/
51 matches
Mail list logo
