We need to do some database maintenance, so the opensolaris.org site will
be offline briefly starting around 9:00 - 9:15 am PDT today (Wednesday).
We expect the outage to last no more than 15 minutes.
Eric
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
>
> the opensolaris.org site will be offline briefly starting around 9:00 -
> 9:15 am PDT today (Wednesday)...
>
Correction: "today (Thursday)"
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
We need to bring the Mailman service down starting now. We
expect it to be back online in 60 - 90 minutes.
Eric
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Mario Goebbels wrote:
>
> ...
> I don't think that the name "OpenSolaris" is making the big difference
> here
>
Agreed. I'd even go so far as to say uptake of Nevada might be
on the verge of /skyrocketing/ with this release. I believe
there's massive, long-building, pent up
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Shawn Walker wrote:
>
> I suggest you choose more accurate and less inflammatory
> descriptions of actions taken...
>
I agree.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
>> On 31/10/2007, Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Simon Phipps wrote:
>>>
> Who is it? I think it's an important question.
There is no arbiter - that would imply a political frame. This is an
open source co
Ian Murdock wrote:
> Eric Boutilier wrote:
>> Agreed. We're certainly being watched very closely by the rest
>> of the FOSS/UNIX/Linux world -- and from day one we've been
>> breaking exciting new ground in that world in tons of wonderful
>> ways -- but
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> [ Moving to advocacy-discuss ]
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Alan Burlison wrote:
>> Eric Boutilier wrote:
>>
>>> As Alan Coopersmith just alluded to, it's not up to the OGB to
>>> mandate a vote. (Nor is it up t
[ Moving to advocacy-discuss ]
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Alan Burlison wrote:
> Eric Boutilier wrote:
>
>> As Alan Coopersmith just alluded to, it's not up to the OGB to
>> mandate a vote. (Nor is it up to Sun of course); and among those
>> who do have the power
Eric Boutilier wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Alan Burlison wrote:
>> MC wrote:
>>
>>> My understanding of the OpenSolaris constitution, community, and
OGB is that the OGB appoints members of the community ("core
contributers") to have the power to vote on
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Alan Burlison wrote:
> MC wrote:
>
>> My understanding of the OpenSolaris constitution, community, and OGB is that
>> the OGB appoints members of the community ("core contributers") to have the
>> power to vote on issues that concern the community.
>>
>> The naming issue obv
ulson wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Mark Martin wrote:
>
>> On 10/11/07, Eric Boutilier wrote:
>>>
>>> Basic spam filtering with SpamAssassin is now running on the
>>> Mailman server. As a result, we recommend that mail-list owners
>>> (modera
Basic spam filtering with SpamAssassin is now running on the
Mailman server. As a result, we recommend that mail-list owners
(moderators) reinstate "friendly" handling of non-subscriber
posts, as follows:
- Go to the Privacy -> Sender Filters screen and change the
"generic_nonmember_action" opt
Alan Burlison wrote:
> ...
>
> Anyone interested, please take a look at
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/website/ and post followups to
website-discuss.
>
>
+1
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Dave Miner wrote:
> Eric Boutilier wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Dave Miner wrote:
>>> ... See:
>>>
>>> http://blogs.sun.com/dminer/entry/indiana_installer_prototype
>>
>> This news (which I think is *awesome*, by the way) mak
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Dave Miner wrote:
> ... See:
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/dminer/entry/indiana_installer_prototype
This news (which I think is *awesome*, by the way) makes me wonder
now more than ever which install clusters do/don't contain
non-redistributable files (if any).
http://mail.opensola
games-discuss seems to be the best place for people interested
in wine on OpenSolaris these days.
Via Jive forum:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=97
Via "listserv" (Mailman actually):
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/games-discuss
___
[Cross-posting to osol-discuss and indiana-discuss. Followups to
laptop-discuss please. I've set the reply-to header accordingly.]
Prompted partly by anticipation (and delight) of the distro constructor
project being discussed on indiana-discuss recently, I bought an
"economy model" laptop ove
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Ian Collins wrote:
I just tried installing the codec pack from
http://opensolaris.es/codec-pack.sh and the install fails with
In case this helps, on indiana-discuss, the author of the codec
pack wrote:
= ...
= The bright side is that I committed all the patches I wrote for
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
You can also try Dennis Clarke's "A Step by Step Guide to Installing Solaris
10":
http://www.blastwave.org/docs/s10u3_howto.html
I feel guilty for never bothering to send feedback to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
There is also a Solaris x86 FAQ at:
http://faq
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Simford Dong wrote:
Project Proposal: Globalization Workspaces
G11N (Globalization) Consolidation has released a couple of source tarballs
in Sun Download Center last year:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/g11n/downloads/software/current/
Community users can download and browse the
it's nice. Could you post your configure options for Qt 4.3.0 ?? ...
In case this helps, I'm working on maintaining a "clearinghouse" of
published OpenSolaris freeware (F/OSS) porting data, aka build recipes:
http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/BuildRecipesReference
Case in point: The build
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Ian Murdock wrote:
+1. Can we have our list now?
+1 from me for what it's worth. In other words getting that resource (a
list) typically goes hand-in-hand with a project going from proposal status
to community-approved status, but I'm pretty sure that's just protocol, not
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Ian Murdock wrote:
On 5/31/07, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before we go too far down the track of creating a "so called" reference
binary distribution of OpenSolaris I think we need to first clearly for
the whole community document exactly what problem we are
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Simon Phipps wrote:
On May 31, 2007, at 13:36, James Carlson wrote:
I don't think anyone is saying that you can't create a distribution
yourself without bothering with any project, community, or governing
board. You can. Knock yourself out.
But that's not what's happeni
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Ian Murdock wrote:
...
...
*Building a reference isn't the main goal*. What is the main goal? Making
OpenSolaris more accessible to people like this: ...
Understood, and that's precisely why I keep saying Indiana needs a reset
based on case 2007/047. Indiana's goals (e.g. Ma
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Ian Murdock wrote:
...
Given how negative this community is on Linux...
But when one looks literally *anywhere* else on opensolaris.org besides this
list one finds the complete opposite, namely, flexibility, diversity,
non-zealotry, and non-fear. And with that in mind, it's
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears to me that item #2 can be broken down further. The idea of
having a reference distribution is totally different from the
requirement to be compatible.
Right; AFAIK distributions like "Nexenta" would not fall under the
"compatible" defin
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Eric Boutilier wrote:
Me too. In fact for me it's the CRUX of the whole problem.
(Assuming this project still wants to be Sun-derived.) It's
THE single show-stopper. In other words, without it, then I'd
be happy to see the project go forward as-is.
Clari
On Thu, 31 May 2007, James Carlson wrote:
Glynn Foster writes:
...
The only other sticking point is the name, and I agree with your concerns -
though arguably that's the most exciting part of the project proposal. I'm not
trying alienate all the other current or future distributions in any of th
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Alan DuBoff wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Eric Boutilier wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, the OGB _has_ put the new process in force.
Correction Alan.
That was not me, it was Keith saying that.
Eric
___
opensolaris-di
Here are links to the latest batch of overview reports (05/01 - 05/15).
You can also receive them by subscribing to the RSS feed:
http://del.icio.us/rss/bootblog/oss:rollups
Or bookmarking the URL:
http://del.icio.us/bootblog/oss:rollups
clearview-discuss 05/01 - 05/15
h
12 shaybery at gmail.com (shay)
12 dougs at truemail.co.th (doug scott)
11 eric.boutilier at sun.com (eric boutilier)
11 wp at hawaiilinux.us (w. wayne liauh)
11 artem.kachitchkin at sun.com (artem kachitchkine)
10 moinak.ghosh
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:50:07AM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
Twice this month, for the creation of new projects, I posted
the following:
"Also copying OGB... FYI, we're moving ahead with with the setup of this
project und
+1. I'm 100% in the camp with those who hold the views
expressed in this message (and, of course, those expressed in
James' message subsequent to this one).
Eric
On Thu, 31 May 2007, James Carlson wrote:
John Plocher writes:
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
If you want to create an OpenSolaris refer
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:57:32PM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:41:52AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
The process requires that this be sent to one or more community groups
Here are links to the batch of overview reports that were
just posted.
You can also receive them by subscribing to the RSS feed:
http://del.icio.us/rss/bootblog/oss:rollups
Or bookmarking the URL:
http://del.icio.us/bootblog/oss:rollups
clearview-discuss 04/16 - 04/30
http
For background on what this is, see:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=24416#24416
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=25200#25200
=
opensolaris-discuss 04/16 - 04/30
=
Size of all threads du
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
I know we approved it...
I take it that means either I missed something (if so, help please) or the
OGB is behind on publishing meeting minutes...
Eric
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-dis
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:41:52AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
The process requires that this be sent to one or more community groups
for sponsorship consideration...
I don't agree. Here's how I'd put it: "The almost-but-not-quite-yet OGB
blessed p
Thanks, Dave. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to
get you set up.
Eric
On Fri, 25 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Summary:
Provide source code for the Emulex Fibre Channel device driver that
operates in the Leadville environment.
Overview:
We propose the creation of a new
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Gueven Bay wrote:
So, the presentation was held. All the people there learned what Project
Indiana is.
Can someone write in some short sentences what Mr. Murdock told you,please?
...
The core draft of their idea, which they plan to refine with com
On Tue, 29 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the OGB have any plans for when the first release
of OpenSolaris from the OpenSolaris community will be
made?
No, but the opensolaris-ma
Neale -- Do you want to be set up with a project space? --Eric
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Neale Ferguson wrote:
It will be a project as well but it's my understanding that projects now exist
within communities, so this is the 1st step.
Hi Neale,
There will probably be a new Community Group (CG) called Platform Ports
that this project is perfect for. (*big* +1
On Tue, 22 May 2007, James Carlson wrote:
...
The implication of what Ian has been suggesting is that this new
distribution will essentially have Major release binding. All options
are open, and what we had thought of as legacy interfaces preserved
for compatibility (such as default "df" output
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Ian Murdock wrote:
On 5/22/07, Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Ian Murdock wrote:
> On 5/21/07, Brian Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't think one distro can be all things to all
>> people.
>
> A
On Thu, 17 May 2007, James Carlson wrote:
Ian Murdock writes:
(And, once again, I'm not sure I see anything here that isn't fixed
with a "Solaris classic" environment.)
Do we force future project teams to test in both environments?
Eh? Ian -- if the above is a valid question, then my brain i
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Ian Murdock wrote:
On 5/21/07, Brian Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think one distro can be all things to all
people.
Agreed. That's why there's still plenty of room for other distros,
regardless of what Sun does.
Ian, you aren't gonna win this one by trying to
On Wed, 16 May 2007, John Plocher wrote:
...
...
Technical Description
My list: packaging, installation, GNU userland alongside
"Solaris classic userland", and laptop support (see what I mean
that there are already people working on these things?).
Indeed. Deja vu
Thanks, Joey. I'll contact you offline to get you setup.
Also copying OGB... FYI, we're moving ahead with with the setup of this
project under the old process. The 2-business-day discussion period has
been satisfied, it has sponsorship of the Academic and Research Community,
and has been seconded
Thanks, Nicolas. I'll contact you offline to get you setup.
Also copying OGB... FYI, we're moving ahead with with the
setup of this project under the old process. The
2-business-day discussion period has been satisfied, it has
sponsorship of the Networking Community, and has been
seconded.
Eric
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I realize the Indiana Project is in the early requirements stage,
nevertheless I think it would be _ver
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I realize the Indiana Project is in the early requirements stage,
nevertheless I think it would be _very_ useful to note the alignment
between where the Indiana project appears to be headed and the
I realize the Indiana Project is in the early requirements stage,
nevertheless I think it would be _very_ useful to note the alignment
between where the Indiana project appears to be headed and the design goals
of the BeleniX OpenSolaris developer community.
Some very recent news and related disc
Thanks, Gavin. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to
get you set up.
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Gavin Maltby wrote:
The Project
This project proposes improving the generic support of x86
CPUs that implement the Machine Check Architecture (MCA). It
also proposes to cr
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Bryan Cantrill wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:54:17AM -0700, John Mark Walker wrote:
Coming from a Linux background, I don't expect OpenSolaris to look and
feel like Linux, but I do expect the OpenSolaris community to actively
engage with people like me. My impression is
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Eric Boutilier wrote:
...
Good point. Even though that document is not official policy yet, it's
really close. So in addition, I'd like to suggest that Gavin work with the
FM Community Group leaders to pull together the information outlined in
section 2.2.
Just
It should probably be pointed out here that Michal is
announcing (I'm pretty sure) a development effort, JPack,
that exists within the JDS Project (that exists within the
opensolaris.org Desktop Community Group); as opposed to
seeking official opensolaris.org Project status for JPack.
(Sorry to
On Thu, 10 May 2007, James Carlson wrote:
Gavin Maltby writes:
The Project
This project proposes improving the generic support of x86
CPUs that implement the Machine Check Architecture (MCA). It
*whew* PS/2 flashback ...
+1 on the idea, but the currently proposed project cre
MC wrote:
...
OpenSolaris is Solaris code that Sun has made open source...
I'd be more inclined to say it like this:
OpenSolaris, on June 15th 2005, was Solaris code that Sun
made open source, thereafter OpenSolaris is OpenSolaris
Community code[1].
Eric
1. As codified by the charter + cons
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Brian Gupta wrote:
What is OpenSolaris?
Reality: (My observation, a bit cynical)
-
OpenSolaris is Sun's Solaris development team's project site. The
process has been opened up to the public, to expand the Solaris
developer community to include unpaid volunteers. (unpa
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Cyril Plisko wrote:
On 5/3/07, Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So
Given the difficulties of incorporating the swt libraries needed
to make Azureus work on Solaris, what other BitTorrent client should
Solaris incorporate?
I'd say rtorrent[1]. It is my favorit
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Nicolas Droux wrote:
...
What is the current process to get a new community
started? Should I go with what is described in the communities page, or is a
new process required now that the constitution has been approved.
Any info or ptr will be appreciated.
Thanks!
Nicolas
Thanks, Cindi. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to
get you set up
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, cindi wrote:
The Project
This project proposes extensions to the fault management architecture (FMA)
to support a sensor abstraction layer for the collection and analysis of
sensor based telemetry
Thanks, Ted. You have seconds, and the Storage Community Group confirmed
sponsorship. I'll contact you offline to get you set up.
Eric
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Ted Pogue wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-
Thanks, Nitin. Your proposal has been seconded, and the
Networking Community confirmed sponsorship. I'll contact you
offline to get you set up.
Eric
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Nitin Hande wrote:
Overview:
IP on Infiniband (IPoIB) is a GLDv2 based driver implemented as per IETF RFC 4392 "IP over
In
Here are links to the latest batch of overview reports (rollups).
You can also receive them by subscribing to the RSS feed:
http://del.icio.us/rss/bootblog/oss:rollups
or bookmarking the URL:
http://del.icio.us/bootblog/oss:rollups
clearview-discuss 04/01 - 04/15
http://mail
This is a belated "Links to rollup reports" post. It
corresponds to the batch of overview reports posted a couple
weeks that covered the 2nd half of March.
The current one is coming next.
--
clearview-discuss 03/16 - 03/31
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/clearview-discuss/2007-April/00091
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
I don't see them here though...
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=79
They were sent to just the community leaders
25 alan.coopersmith at sun.com (alan coopersmith)
24 darren.moffat at sun.com (darren j moffat)
19 dclarke at blastwave.org (dennis clarke)
15 eric.boutilier at sun.com (eric boutilier)
14 tripivceta at hotmail.com (unix admin)
14 bd
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Alan DuBoff wrote:
...
If Chung wants to help, he should get involved and try to fix it...
+1000
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Chung Hang Christopher Chan wrote:
If Chung wants to help, he should get involved and
try to fix it.
I have started trying to compile apt and dpkg under
Sun Studio 11...
Chung,
Just so I'm clear, the Nexenta design philosophy is (as with many other
people) one of the t
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, sujay wrote:
Greetings,
We have ported parted :)
Nice!
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, homerun wrote:
Hi
zfs makes solaris now good choise to store media content.
could it be possible to get as part of "freeware" and integrated to /usr/sfw -
tree some Upnp mediaserver.
i have found two media servers that runs on linux
- MediaTomb http://mediatomb.cc
- GMediaS
Sorry for the accidental Cc to opensolaris-discuss.
<:-(
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Eric Boutilier wrote:
Hi Eric
We need a few items to initiate your project:
- A short name for the URL. This is generally one word or
abbreviation (e.g tesla), or two words separated by a hyphen.
- A one-l
Hi Eric
We need a few items to initiate your project:
- A short name for the URL. This is generally one word or
abbreviation (e.g tesla), or two words separated by a hyphen.
- A one-line title (Tesla?)
- A descriptive sentence or short paragraph (a few sentences)
explaining the project or
Thanks, Eric. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline
to get you set up.
EricB
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Eric Saxe wrote:
I'd like to propose a project to provide an enhanced platform independent
power
management architecture...to be known as "Project Tesla".
From a high level, this project woul
Thanks, Pramod. Your proposal has been seconded. I'll contact
you offline to get you set up.
Eric
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Pramod Badripra Gunjikar wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose an open solaris project for :
Solaris Open Fabrics User Verbs / API Support
Open Fabrics User Verbs / API is
g)
23 binarycrusader at gmail.com (shawn walker)
18 eric.boutilier at sun.com (eric boutilier)
17 rlhamil at smart.net (richard l. hamilton)
16 dclarke at blastwave.org (dennis clarke)
15 mb1x at gmx.com (martin bochnig)
14 wp at hawaiilinux.
Thanks, Garrett. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline
to get you set up.
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
I would like to propose the creation of a project to incorporate various
platform specific support for Tadpole platforms into OpenSolaris. This
would include core platform
Thanks, Shivakumar. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to
get you set up.
Eric
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, gns wrote:
Project proposal : busybox-ksh93
Busybox on OpenSolaris is about providing a busybox equivalent for OpenSolaris.
This will help in making possible small sized distros and dist
Thanks, William. Your proposal has been seconded. I'll
contact you offline to get you set up.
Eric
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Guan Zhi (William) wrote:
PROJECT PROPOSAL - CPK Cryptosystem
I would like to propose a "CPK cryptosystem" project to implement
CPK (Combined Public Key) algorithm on OpenSola
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Re-thinking this... OSNet maybe needs to be designated special status in
the OpenSolaris Community/Project structure. It's "neither fish nor fowl".
We don't want to encourage forking at the core (kernel) level, therefore we
don't need an umbrella k
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Re-thinking this... OSNet maybe needs to be designated special status in
the OpenSolaris Community/Project structure. It's "neither fish nor fowl".
We don't want to encourage forking at the core (kernel) level
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Mark J. Nelson wrote:
1. Rename OpenSolaris ON Community to "OSNet"
This change is actually an artifact of the community/project shared
namespace on os.o. It's a confusing annoyance, but really this
community
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Stephen Lau wrote:
Mark J. Nelson wrote:
7. I haven't figured out what will be needed in the way of an on-discuss
mailing list. We traditionally have not had such a beast inside Sun,
though on-all has occasionally been [discuss]used in this fashion.
Anybody got an
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Mark J. Nelson wrote:
1. Rename OpenSolaris ON Community to "OSNet"
This change is actually an artifact of the community/project shared
namespace on os.o. It's a confusing annoyance, but really this
community should be where the on-gate project lives, and that project
Thanks, Yong. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to
get you set up
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Yong Sun wrote:
I'd like to propose a project about Input Method for OpenSolaris.
The scope of this project would be:
1. To support IIIMF (which is currently the defualt IM framework on Solaris) on
Here are links to the latest batch of overview reports (rollups).
You can also receive them by subscribing to the RSS feed:
http://del.icio.us/rss/bootblog/oss:rollups
or bookmarking the URL:
http://del.icio.us/bootblog/oss:rollups
cab-discuss 03/01 - 03/15
http://mail.opens
Thanks, John. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to
get you set up.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, John Forte wrote:
The NWS project consists of drivers, libraries and utilities in support of
storage interconnect technologies including both Fibre Channel and iSCSI.
The NWS project source code ha
alan.coopersmith at sun.com (alan coopersmith)
22 james.d.carlson at sun.com (james carlson)
18 mb1x at gmx.com (martin bochnig)
17 darren.moffat at sun.com (darren j moffat)
17 eric.boutilier at sun.com (eric boutilier)
14 binarycrusader at gma
[Convention-aware me: "I'm sorry here for following up to my own post."
Actual Me: "Why should I be?"]
Previously, I wrote:
Previously, Dave Miner wrote:
At the risk of repeating myself for about the 50th time in the past year,
I'd encourage these packaging-related discussions to occur with th
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Dave Miner wrote:
...
Hey, if it would help get people directed in the right place I'd split off a
packaging-discuss list for the SVR4 packaging project, but I tend to doubt it
would have any real effect, since these conversations (as was the case here)
all too often are
At the risk of repeating myself for about the 50th time in the past year, I'd
encourage these packaging-related discussions to occur with the community
list specifically devoted to them, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Those in
the community with ideas can actually start working on them, since the
packaging
Would it help cost-wise to consider migrating some things? I would think at
least some of your apps/DB/mail systems could use the HW/SW infrastructure
and bandwidth that opensoloaris.org provides...
Re-reading this, and based some of the darker days this this
list has seen, I now fear a reply l
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Erast Benson wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 08:18 -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
But that just brings us back to Joe's original point:
Isn't that Nexenta?
Note the Nexenta project is by all rights and intentions (Erast, correct me
if I'm wrong) a projec
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Alan DuBoff wrote:
On Monday 19 March 2007 05:13 pm, David Lloyd wrote:
Joe,
Indeed, apt-get for Solaris would be quite useful :P
Isn't that Nexenta? Had to say it.
I don't want the Ubuntu Userland on an OpenSolaris code base. I'd prefer
a distribution as close to Sun'
The sfwnv-discuss list might be a better venue for this discussion. Some of
the people subscribed there might not be subscribed here.
Eric
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
This is not an FAQ -- official, unofficial, authorized,
unauthorized, or any such. It's a just some questions and
answers about OpenSolaris project management that I've
harvested from my outbox and cleaned up a bit. Comments
welcome.
[This message is cross-posted to opensolaris-discuss and
websit
1 - 100 of 545 matches
Mail list logo
