Hi,
a 'hardware loadbalancer' was too expensive for us, but we
are using a 'linux virtual server' which do the same thing without
any cost - very good.
look at http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org
klaus
> -Original Message-
> From: calvin matthews [mailto
Not sure if this helps but
With web servers like IIS, people generally store the session info in a
database when using a 3rd party hardware load balancer.
/Jason
-Original Message-
From: calvin matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 3:42 PM
To: Orion
Hi,
How can you replace the loadbalancer application with a hardware load
balancer, such that all servers are accessing the same application and the
session integrity is maintained?
Has any one done it?
Thanks,
Calvin
In following the discussions from the person working with Iplanet, I understand that
you could have a hardware solution with multiple Orion servers. Did I understand that
correctly? Let me pose a hypothetical question:
Suppose a company the size of Sears, picked Orion and Gemstone as the
hi everybody!
does anyone have a link / hint about hardware&software configuration for
08/15 web apps?
in my concrete case i need a solution for a mid-sized business (20-30
concurrent connections, userbase ~1000, a system for retailers ordering
stuff directly from the producer). we do not
0Mhz cpus, 1GB
memory, Ultra SCSI 160 hds, etc.
Hope that helps. Feel free to ask questions..
> -Original Message-
> From: Neal Kaiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 2:04 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: Clustering Advice, Software or Har
s
and cons of hardware vs software clustering?
Thanks, Neal
At 06:53 PM 10/12/2000 +0200, you wrote:
>Hi Kevin,
>
>Do you create the database in IBConsole ? Because the ibconsole has an bug
>when
>creating databases.
>If so, you probably have to get the newer version of IBConsole :
>URL : http://www.interbase.com/open/downloads/ib_download.html
>goto the
t: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 2:37 PM
>> To: Orion-Interest
>> Subject: RE: HARDWARE FOR J2EE apps
>>
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Robert Krueger wrote:
>>
>> [description of budget-friendly Orion setup - snip]
>>
>> &
18:53
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: Re: HARDWARE FOR J2EE apps
>
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Do you create the database in IBConsole ? Because the ibconsole
> has an bug when
> creating databases.
> If so, you probably have to get the newer version of IBConsole :
> URL : http://
At 13:58 12.10.00 , you wrote:
> >it's a shame Software AG failed so miserably making Adabas D a
> >well-supported product. they were the first commercial database vendor to
> >port to linux and the software has all the features you need (including
> >clustering support) at an unbeatable price. so
At 13:58 12.10.00 , you wrote:
> >it's a shame Software AG failed so miserably making Adabas D a
> >well-supported product. they were the first commercial database vendor to
> >port to linux and the software has all the features you need (including
> >clustering support) at an unbeatable price. so
Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
>
> Sybase JDBC drivers are called "JConnect". Current version is 5.2 (for
> JDBC2) and 4.2 (JDBC1)
>
> I had a few problems with them ages ago and bought a commercial driver -
> never tried again, but they have evolved I think.
> > And JDBC drivers for Sybase? Las
>it's a shame Software AG failed so miserably making Adabas D a
>well-supported product. they were the first commercial database vendor to
>port to linux and the software has all the features you need (including
>clustering support) at an unbeatable price. somehow nobody outside germany
>seems to
sage-
> > From: Scott Stirling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 3:25 PM
> > To: Orion-Interest
> > Subject: RE: HARDWARE FOR J2EE apps
> >
> >
> > Why would you use mySQL over Postgresl? They're both free,
> > bu
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Kinnvall
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 5:29 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: Interbase Details [Was HARDWARE FOR J2EE apps]
>
>
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> > I'm not sure wh
-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Rimov
> > Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 3:06 PM
> > To: Orion-Interest
> > Subject: Interbase Details [Was HARDWARE FOR J2EE apps]
> >
> >
> > At 06:24 PM 10/11/2000 -0
u have highly available ejbs when
> > the database server goes down. many people use clustered apache/jserv on
> > linux and cheap pc-hardware for high volume transactional websites but have
> > a large enterprise sun running oracle in the back. anyone out there running
> >
servlets but
> > the really expensive part is, when you want that high availability for
> your
> > database. it doesn't buy you much if you have highly available ejbs when
> > the database server goes down. many people use clustered apache/jserv on
> > linux and cheap pc-h
Hi!
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> I'm not sure why noone has mentioned Sybase yet? Sybase 11.0.3.3 on Linux is
> free for all uses, and supports replication, backup servers etc etc etc.
> Very full featured and quite fast from my experience, a true enterprise
> RDBMS.
And JDB
L PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Rimov
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 3:06 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: Interbase Details [Was HARDWARE FOR J2EE apps]
>
>
> At 06:24 PM 10/11/2000 -0400, you wrote:
> >Why would you use mySQL over Postgresl
At 06:24 PM 10/11/2000 -0400, you wrote:
>Why would you use mySQL over Postgresl? They're both free, but Postgresql
>has a
>JDBC driver that's XA-compliant. Also, mySQL is known to blow away your whole
>database if it has a bad crash, whereas Postgresql is better at persisting
>data
>through a
gt; hard to set up clustered web services with static pages and servlets but
>> the really expensive part is, when you want that high availability for
your
>> database. it doesn't buy you much if you have highly available ejbs when
>> the database server goes down. many peop
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stirling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 3:25 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: HARDWARE FOR J2EE apps
>
>
> Why would you use mySQL over Postgresl? They're both free,
> but Postgresql
make this
work?
> -Original Message-
> From: David Kinnvall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 2:37 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: HARDWARE FOR J2EE apps
>
>
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Robert Krueger wrote:
>
&
compare to Postgresql? Is it free?
Scott Stirling
West Newton, MA
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Duffey, Kevin
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 4:01 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: HARDWARE FOR J2EE apps
>
services with static pages and servlets but
> the really expensive part is, when you want that high availability for your
> database. it doesn't buy you much if you have highly available ejbs when
> the database server goes down. many people use clustered apache/jserv on
> linux
when you want that high
> availability for your
> database. it doesn't buy you much if you have highly
> available ejbs when
> the database server goes down. many people use clustered
> apache/jserv on
> linux and cheap pc-hardware for high volume transactional
> websites
t is, when you want that high availability for your
database. it doesn't buy you much if you have highly available ejbs when
the database server goes down. many people use clustered apache/jserv on
linux and cheap pc-hardware for high volume transactional websites but have
a large enterprise sun runn
ght.
> I would be very gratefull if anyone with experience tell me what
> it's the appropiate hardware to develope ejbs, servlets and
> jsps, and what
> it's the appropiate in order to run an app with a great load
> of concurrent
> users.
>
> I wanna know
I would be very gratefull if anyone with experience tell me what
it's the appropiate hardware to develope ejbs, servlets and jsps, and what
it's the appropiate in order to run an app with a great load of concurrent
users.
I wanna know your opinion about what to choose Unix(
Funny,
We are using 4500's here and they haven't skipped a beat.
On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 06:23:07PM -0700, Kevin Duffey wrote:
> Orion hardware?Hi,
>
> We had some disaster problems with IBMs NetFinity racks. We had to send all 5 back
>at various times. The HDs died,
Hello,
I am in a similar situation. However Orion is up against the likes of
WebLogic, WebSphere and IAS.
On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 06:25:53PM -0400, Hani Suleiman wrote:
> F5 load balancer in front. Has anyone experienced any issues with
> scalability given this hardware? The main concern
Title: Orion hardware?
Hi,
We had
some disaster problems with IBMs NetFinity racks. We had to send all 5 back at
various times. The HDs died, the systems overheated, etc. They looked nice in
principal, but in reality they didn't hold up so well. We now use Dell servers
which kick ass
Title: Orion hardware?
I've almost convinced my company to go with Orion as our choice of application server (vs Dynamo, which is horrific). Now, the intended hardware is a bunch of IBM servers, dual pentium's with 1gb of ram, with an F5 load balancer in front. Has anyone exper
By now, I'm only developing EJBs but in a short time we want to
implement a real application and I want to know more or less the harware
requirements for a high load production enviroment with orion.
Suppose 1000 pages/sec 500.000 pages/day.
MEmory, proccesor, number of CPUs
PLease i
36 matches
Mail list logo
