RE: What is Pentax equipment?

I'm new to Pentax bodies having used crappy Ricoh's until I bought an LX recently. Therefore I have non-Pentax lenses. Yes, I plan to buy Pentax lenses as soon as the budget allows but in the meantime I will get by with my off-brand lenses. Incidentally I have a Vivitar Series 1 105mm Macro tha

Best Zoom lens

hi all. after spending the last few days scanning all my slides from my summer hols, I've decided to stomp my 28-200 Pentax lens to dust. (luckily, I was also using another lens as well, so I have most of the shots twice thank [Insert appropriate Deity here]. I shot a LOT of Provia F (Sharp,

Re: third party zoom lenses

Asahi built the Tower cameras that Sears sold. Not the lenses. The lenses sold with these cameras I think had the Asahi name on them. Later Sears branded cameras were from Ricoh and maybe Chinon (I seem to remember a couple of models from Sears that looked like then current Chinon offerings). I

Re: A butchered (AKA "modern") LX

I confess I'm not familiar with an F5. Is it really true then that I can remove a winder and the autofocus drive and associated weight? (Gotta be able to drop down to a light weight here.) Is CW IDM metering really available? Tell me all about it! Regards, Bob... From: "Skofteland, Christian" <[

Re: More London eye shots (Re: This moths PUG photos that work for me)

Charing Cross 1 - beautiful shot. too good reflections. Which film is it Jostein ? how long was the exposure ? btw, which scanner do you use ? >From: "Jostein Xksne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: More London eye shots (Re: This moths PUG pho

Pentax FA 24-90 enabled

Bought it together with a B&W slim MRC UV filter and a B&W slim MRC circ. polarizer. Let the fun begin. Frank - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.k

Re: What is Pentax equipment?

I shouldn't think so. Requiring all items, including your strap and your belt buckle to be Pentax is a bit foolish. No one has ever complained over occasional third party glass in the open galleries. I've never heard anyone be so purist as to insist on yer flash be Pentax. Regards, Bob... From:

Re: Slides vs digital

Either you have a fantastic lab or you don't scan enough and use digital yet. I scan all my negs and the huge difference is that my Coolpix digital images don't have all the dust cleanup and scratch problems my film negatives have. Much like CD's and vinyl records. Right now I think sensitivity

Re: Slides vs digital

Bob R. wrote: > In order for digital to match conventional processes, the dynamic range must > be increased and then the linear range must be translated to the standard > "S" curve to give the gradations available to conventional film and print > material. Think here of a d-max of greater that 6.

RE: What is Pentax equipment?

> Incidentally I have a Vivitar Series 1 105mm Macro > that focuses to 1:1. It is far superior to Pentax > and Nikon glass in my humble opinion. Christian, My experience is that the Macro may account for a good part of the distinction. The Pentax A100/2.8 Macro is a cut above most other Penta

RE: third party zoom lenses

These "202" series lenses, made in Korea, have proven themselves to be not only good values, but just plain good lenses. There's also a 135/2.8 of the same manufacturer that's pretty good as well. They usually sell for about $15-$20 -- even the later ones with the 'A' setting! A bit flare prone

Re: Best Zoom lens

> I already have most of the primes to cover > these ranges, but there are times when you > don't want to lug 4 lenses with you, which > is why I want a nice crisp zoom. T, I've grown to like the A35-105/3.5 zoom. With a M20/4 and a M200/4 you have most everything covered with a light kit. Re

RE: Vivitar Series 1 lens?

Mine is the F2.8. I got it a few years ago before going to the Grand Canyon. Christian Skofteland -Original Message- From: Steve Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 9:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Vivitar Series 1 lens? - Original Message

Re: The PUG Guy yips a second time

Flavio Minelli wrote: > > Robert Harris wrote: > > > > Flavio Minelli wrote: > > ... > > > > > > Come on, can't we be consistent with ourselves? > > > > "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds." > > ... > > I don't know, but it resembles a phrase by Beldin in some Eddings' book >

Re: Slides vs digital

In biblical terms, Legion would be a gathering of demons. :) Collin Original As Dave Mann points out, that number is turning out to be legion. A legion that swells its numbers with every passing day. - --Mike - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go

Re: Slides vs digital

"Skofteland, Christian" wrote: > > I (and I'm sure most people on this list) do not agree. > > Print film, slide film, any film will not go away. He didn't say that. > Digital imaging will > never replace a photograph. This statement makes no sense. > > There is no substitution for the

Screwed Up

Got myself some T-Max 100 sheet film, 100-sheet box. Opened it in my changing bag. Found out it comes in 25-sheet packs. Convenient. Opened the first one in the bag and moved it to a smaller box for convenience and put the rest into the freezer. Examined the bag. Looked to be light-tight. So I

RE: A butchered (AKA "modern") LX

Hey, I was just suggesting that if you want a FULL featured SLR that does everything an LX does (interchangeable finders, focusing screens, etc.) with all the auto-focus, -auto-program, auto-film critiquing in a "modern" SLR then the F5 is the only autofocus SLR system that has those features. Su

Grandfather Mountain, NC

I finally got to go, though without any fellow PUGsters. For those who haven't been, this is a worthy place for our equipment. It has a little bit of everything, something for your widest angle and something for your longest telephoto. Looking forward to next year outing! - This message is from

RE: Slides vs digital

Think of this next time you see one of those high tech computer generated digital movie spectaculars. I think they qualify as having high quality color saturation and contrast. That capability is certainly there for digital, it is only a matter of time before it comes down to the consumer level.

Re: Best Zoom lens

I have very similar feelings about my 28-200 Pentax, plus I was annoyed from the start with the cheap feel/build quality of the lens. When I updated to AF in 1997, I thought "Great! I can carry just one lens now.", but soon found that wasn't true. At infinity focus, it's more like 180mm, while

Re: Slides vs digital

"Nenad Djurdjevic" writes: >As far as I know digital technology has no answer to slides. Does anyone know if >digital >technology can produce high resolution slides that can be projected? (and I >don't mean >via one of those projection TV systems). Hi, yesterday I was with a lab guy, and he

Re: Slides vs digital

Hey! You misquoted, I didn't say that. tv "Lewis, Gerald" wrote: > > Think of this next time you see one of those high tech computer generated > digital movie spectaculars. I think they qualify as having high quality > color saturation and contrast. That capability is certainly there for > di

Re: Shooting cats, that I can understand, but Trumpeter swans?

Mike. No they are not in season yet.Just the cats(my wife has 5 please help me).The swans chase me. In regards to your story,we had a similar event about a year or so ago,were some one walked into a local barn and killed 2 horses , then returned a few months later and repeated the process.No on h

RE: Slides vs digital

I believe even THAT digital wizardry is put on film before we watch it at the theater Christian Skofteland -Original Message- From: Lewis, Gerald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:30 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Slides vs digital Think of t

Re: Manual back-up bodies

Chris wrote: > I think that other than in auto-focus it is a lower specification tool than > the PZ-1. It lacks the "Hyper" shift capability that is really useful. This isn't entirely correct. The MZ-S offer hyper modes; it does have aperture priority mode and manual simultaneously available s

Re: MZ-S; fit for the outdoors?

Paul wrote: >In regards to > build-quality, I know that the MZ-S is much better than my Z-1p, but how > much of the MZ-S is actually metal? Much more than on the Z-1p at least. It really doesn't matter. The main difference is that the MZ-S is designed for being sturdy snd stiff whereas the Z-

RE: Best Zoom lens

>after spending the last few days scanning all my slides from my summer >hols, I've decided to stomp my 28-200 Pentax lens to dust. I had the Tamron version of that lens. i just sold it, rather than stomping it to dust, but I know what you mean. >Currently, my thoughts would be: >Tamron 24-135

RE: Slides vs digital

Sorry, it was in the original post you responded to...sorry Jerry -Original Message- From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Slides vs digital Hey! You misquoted, I didn't say that. tv "Lewis, Gerald" wrote: >

RE: Slides vs digital

Even if the digital images are transferred to film, if the resulting color saturation and contrast looks like film, then the digital image must have been that good in the first place for film to capture it. Furthermore, all-digital projection *is* coming. The most recent Star Wars movie was shot

RE: Slides vs digital

That was the original question, putting digital images on transparencies for projection Movie film is on positive transparency film... -Original Message- From: Skofteland, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:14 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:

Re: A butchered (AKA "modern") LX

Christian wrote: > The LX has everything I need! But thats not what its all about. The fact remains that the LX is out of production because not enough people were buying them anymore. The camera was past its selling date. And this is not due to some evil conspiration. The LX doesn't have w

ebay vs. camera shows

I'm going to my first camera show on Sept. 16th. I'm looking forward to the chance to look at lots of equipment. I was wondering, am I likely to get ripped off there, or is there a chance the dealers will be fair? Thanks, Amita - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe

RE: PUG Comment - Edward Kreis

Thanks, Jim! Your words magnificiently colorize this overcast september day for me :) Edward Kreis >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jim Brooks >Subject: PUG Comment - Edward Kreis > >Edward's shot "Riga, After a Thunderstorm", is mag

RE: Slides vs. digital

It doesn't mean I have to like it I will be the last holdout, many, many, years from now with my manual focus LX and slide film while EVERYONE around me is shooting digital My original point was that digital photography is not and never will be a REPLACEMENT for film. It is just another

RE: A butchered (AKA "modern") LX

I'd like to see what Pentax comes up with. I won't rush out to buy it because I'm sure it will be very expensive. Also, with all those features it would have to be bigger than expected. I would think of it as comparing the F3 to the LX. Therefore the modern counterpart to the F3 being the F5 an

RE: Slides vs. digital

Crikey, dont start them on this one, we have already had vinyl/CD and cinema film/digital - lets not do video/DVD/film too! -Original Message- From: Skofteland, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 September 2001 17:12 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Slides vs. digital It

RE: Slides vs. digital

>And before any one argues the whole videotape vs. film issue let me say that >video has replaced film in consumer markets but not in the motion picture >and documentary industry. And that's one replacement that I can guarantee never *will* happen: the motion picture and documentary makers will s

Re: A butchered (AKA "modern") LX

From: "Skofteland, Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [skipped] > > Also, with all those features it would have to be bigger than expected. I > would think of it as comparing the F3 to the LX. Therefore the modern > counterpart to the F3 being the F5 and the F5 is a monstrosity. > I don't want a

Re: ebay vs. camera shows

In a message dated 9/4/2001 10:47:52 AM US Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I'm going to my first camera show on Sept. 16th. > I'm looking forward to the chance to look at lots > of equipment. I was wondering, am I likely to get > ripped off there, or is there a chance the d

Re: More London eye shots (Re: This moths PUG photos that work for me)

Nice shots - nice composition. But they're too dark! Maris - Original Message - From: "Jostein Xksne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 6:08 AM Subject: More London eye shots (Re: This moths PUG photos that work for me) | Tim, Rex, and the r

Re: analog vs digital, etc

Christian wrote: > I believe even THAT digital wizardry is put on film before > we watch it at the theater > From: Gerald Lewis, > Think of this next time you see one of those high tech > computer generated digital movie spectaculars. Bear in mind, though, that motion pictures

RE: Slides vs. digital

or stick with film! :-) Christian Skofteland System Administrator ServerVault Inc. "Securing the Internet" (703)652-5971 (Direct) (703)333-5900 (Main) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, Septe

FS: Pentax SMC-M 28/3.5

Fabulous little lens. Sharp and flare-resistant. With original Pentax hard case. (The case is a bit worn looking but the lens is in EX+ condition.) $65.00 -- Mark Roberts www.robertstech.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and fo

Re: Best Zoom, etc

Mark (?) wrote: > The SMC-A 35-105 is a great lens. A bit on the big and > heavy side but that's the price you pay for quality. I had the good fortune to acquire a SMCK 45-125mm f4 from a fellow Pugster here a while back. This is as good an opening as any for me to exp

Re: Re: analog vs digital, etc

That is why i show my digital pictures to people very fast.WALC(with a little chuckle) Dave motion pictures (any sort) need just the minimum in resolution & stuff. They move so fast in frames/sec that the eye-brain connection easily "sees what it wants to see and

Re: PUG: beyond cameras

>Where are all the threads discussing Pentax endoscopes for sale on >Ebay? I've seen one on offer, but it is full of fungus Pieter, I have some news. That's not *fungus* Cotty ___ Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MacAds traffic

RE: Slides vs. digital

Only until digital becomes tenable from a cost standpoint (which will be a few--very few--years). I'll bet still "chemical" photography survives much longer than motion picture film. As Bill Casselberry pointed out, the resolution needed for motion pictures is lower than for stills. The material

37th Frame to Canada?

Dave wrote: > BTW do you ship your 37th Frame to Canada?? Sure. Sent a few more copies off to Canada in today's mailing. Where would photo magazines be without Canada? We used to mail a lot of copies of _PHOTO Techniques_ to Canada too, and a disproportionate number of contest entries used to

Re: Slides vs digital

I think that there may be some confusion here. May I add to it? >>And before any one argues the whole videotape vs. film issue let me say >that >>video has replaced film in consumer markets but not in the motion picture >>and documentary industry. > >And that's one replacement that I can guarante

RE: Slides vs digital

At 12:50 AM 9/4/2001 -0500, you wrote: >At 10:18 AM 9/3/01 +0100, you wrote: >>For your information, vinyl sales grew at a faster rate than CDs last >>year! There are now upgraded versions of CD with higher sampling rates >>to try and emulate vinyl more closely. If CDs were so perfect then SACD

Re: Christian's loyalty to slides

At 04:07 PM 9/4/2001 -0500, you wrote: >I may be the only person on the planet who is both getting into digital in a >big way and ALSO building a fine custom black-and-white darkroom in my >basement at the same time. I seem to be going down the same path. I'll probably be buying that ridiculous

Re: flash bracket wanted/needed and travel plans.

I use a Stroboframe Press-T and Pro-T. I like the Press-T better since it's a little more compact. It's easier on the wrists.. tv At 05:17 PM 9/4/2001 -0400, you wrote: >I have the same flash I use on a PZ1P for weddings. I use Strobeframe >camera flip. With this bracket the camera flips to do

Re: flash bracket wanted/needed and travel plans.

Thanks, Harry I'll check it out - was hoping someone here had something useful -so will wait a few days before I run to the store. annsan Harry Baughman wrote: > > I have the same flash I use on a PZ1P for weddings. I use Strobeframe > camera flip. With this bracket the camera flips to do vert

Re: flash bracket wanted/needed and travel plans.

So that makes two votes for Stroboframe - I take it these are not major financial investments? a tom wrote: > > I use a Stroboframe Press-T and Pro-T. I like the Press-T better since it's > a little more compact. It's easier on the wrists.. > > tv > > At 05:17 PM 9/4/2001 -0400, you wrote: >

Indiana, along route 24 (Was: flash bracket wanted/needed and travel plans.

Ann S. wrote: > I got nary a response to my previous post and realized I had > lumped too many subjects into one post. Besides, 've been > such a blabber mouth lately > you guys may be deleting every thing I write :) Nah, don't worry Ann, you're no blabber mouth. I for one read your posts and e

Re: third party zoom lenses

At 07:38 4-9-2001 -0400, you wrote: >Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 23:01:18 -0700 >From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: third party zoom lenses > > >I've decided it's time to get a cheap zoom lens > >to play around with. There's a Super Albinar > >80-200mm 4.5 on ebay right now. I've never

website (finally)

My new website is at http://homepage.mac.com/hood1616/PhotoAlbum.html for the time being. Cameron more to come - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://

Re: Indiana, along route 24 (Was: flash bracket wanted/needed andtravel plans.

Lasse Karlsson wrote: > > Ann S. wrote: > > I got nary a response to my previous post and realized I had > > lumped too many subjects into one post. Besides, 've been > > such a blabber mouth lately > > you guys may be deleting every thing I write :) > > Nah, don't worry Ann, you're no blabber

Re: Slides vs digital

On Tue, 4 Sep 2001 20:55:12 +1000, you wrote: >I really do not understand the comparison. Slides offer the highest >resolution available in colour film. Start comparing digital to say 3200 >negative film. Don't read it here - go try it yourself. Digital is as good as 35mm film - right now - for

Re: A 70-210 lens

At 22:05 3-9-2001 -0400, you wrote: >Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 14:30:30 -0700 >From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: A 70-210 lens > > >I recently acquired an A70-210 zoom lens. I have since discovered that > >there is a touch of fungus inside. It doesn't appear to be too bad as it is >

Re: Texas PUG gathering

I would be willing, but my car club (Alfa Romeo) has a gathering for the Wings Over Houston event. open to ideas. I saw that there is a bike race in Houston on Sunday morning, Sept. 16, ever since watching the Giro D'Italia and Topur de France I have been interested in doing some biking pi

Re: Slides vs digital

Mike Johnston wrote: > > Hehee! Who said this? Somebody who hasn't printed digital yet, obviously. > You can control the contrast and saturation of a digiprint to degrees not > even conceivable on film. (snip) And it's even better when you start with film and digitize it on a high-end scanner.

Re: A butchered (AKA "modern") LX

Short answer no. There is no need for for a long answer. At 06:25 AM 9/4/2001 -0700, you wrote: >I confess I'm not familiar with an F5. Is it really true then that I can >remove a winder and the autofocus drive and associated weight? (Gotta be >able to drop down to a light weight here.) Is CW ID

Re: Slides vs digital

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Furthermore, all-digital projection *is* coming. The most recent Star Wars > movie was shot directly onto computer, then edited and assembled and put > onto film for distribution. But a few places (with high-dollar equipment) > displayed it digitally, so what the viewe

Re: PUG Commentary: Bill Peifer

Bill Peifer asked, in regard to my PUG submission, "Amy," Can you tell us where you positioned the > reflector with respect to the subject. High, low, to her front, to her > left, etc? Hi Bill, Thanks for the comments regarding my PUG submission. The reflector was facing the subject. It was

Re: Texas PUG gathering

Sounds like a good idea, but I would prefer a more central location like Austin. Hopefully, more would attend. On Tuesday 04 September 2001 16:05, you wrote: > Let's have one! > Any fall event besides Reneassance Fair in October that is a good > photo op? There is a big air show sometime soon i

RE: Slides vs digital

Not true. Movie film is on negative and a positive "Print" is created later. At 09:36 AM 9/4/2001 -0600, you wrote: >That was the original question, putting digital images on transparencies for >projection Movie film is on positive transparency film... > >-Original Message- >From: S

Re: ebay vs. camera shows

Amita, Before there was eBay, there were the camera swap meets. I would look forward to them in hopes of finding SMC Takumar lenses that I wanted to accumulate for my ES cameras. I would dicker with some of the sellers and sometimes got a good deal. The best part was near the close of the swap

Re: The PUG Guy yips a second time

Who's next Houdini? At 03:31 PM 9/4/2001 -0400, you wrote: >??? Ralph is posting on the list? The spiritualists must be right. > > >Robert Harris wrote: > > > > > > Close but that's not it. Mike Johnston got it -- Ralph Waldo Emerson. > > (See his posts.) > >-- >Tom "Graywolf" Rittenhouse >Grayw

Re: Slides vs digital

At 06:18 PM 9/4/2001 -0500, you wrote: >On Tue, 4 Sep 2001 20:55:12 +1000, you wrote: > >Forget the technical arguments about pixel count vs >resolution vs everything else. Yes, please...I have to laugh a bit when I read or hear people using suspect mathematics to prove that digital can't produ

RE: More London eye shots (Re: This moths PUG photos that work for me)

Hey. Lighten up! Len (Grinning, ducking, and running for cover) --- > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: More London eye shots (

Re: Texas PUG gathering

There is the Raptor Festival held by Heard Natural Science Museum in McKinney, north of Plano, on Sept 15. Lots of great birds that are used to humans so that you can get good and close, and lots of donations. Big event so it's not something that would lend itself to privacy though. Nick --

Re: OT: m42 lens + M42->K adapter + AF Adapter = AF m42 lens?

Yes it can be done. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hi! >I bet this is asked 1000 times before, but anyway :) Is %subj% true? If it >is, what are the limitations (there _should_ be some)? Sorry for possibly >wrong naming of all the parts. > >Regards, > Atvars - This message is from the Pentax-Discu

Re: Slides vs digital

"Mark D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Furthermore, all-digital projection *is* coming. The most recent Star Wars >> movie was shot directly onto computer, then edited and assembled and put >> onto film for distribution. But a few places (with high-dollar equipment)

Re: More London eye shots (Re: This moths PUG photos that work for me)

jostein, i would say instead of having trying another when there is more light, try with faster film ? it will allow to close down aperture as well ? - needs to be thought over the plusses and minuses. what i feel is taking that shot at night with a bit faster film will give better contrast a

Re: Slides vs digital

yes, motion picture industry is a very valid point somehow we all have been missing so far. >From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Slides vs digital >Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 22:52:33 +0100 > >I think that there may be some

Re: ebay vs. camera shows

On Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:46:35 -0400, you wrote: >I'm going to my first camera show on Sept. 16th. >I'm looking forward to the chance to look at lots >of equipment. I was wondering, am I likely to get >ripped off there, or is there a chance the dealers >will be fair? > I've stopped going to the Dal

Re: website (finally)

These are nice Cameron. I particularly like 'Tulip Fields'. Why do you have the same shot twice (LH Rocks)? tv At 03:45 PM 9/4/2001 -0700, you wrote: >My new website is at > >http://homepage.mac.com/hood1616/PhotoAlbum.html > >for the time being. > > >Cameron - This message is from the Pentax-D

Re: Best Zoom lens

>Currently, my thoughts would be: >Tamron 24-135 (I've read some rave reviews about this lens, and my >experience with tamron is quite good to date - the 90/2.8 macro is awesome, >as is the 20-40 zoom) > >Pentax 35-1?5 (Cant remember which one this is (105 or 135?), but I've seen >quite a few peop

Re: Vivitar Series 1 lens?

I have the Vivitar Series I 19-35. I bought it for a trip up north where I wanted a more recta linear wide angle than the F 17 - 28. It's a good lens - fairly sharp and good color rendition. The only problem I experienced was with flair - I had a few shots that could have been titled "Beam m

Test - OT

Just changed my email address for the PDML. This is only a test. :-) Later, Gary - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Grainless at 3200 was: Re: Slides vs digital

From: tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Imagine a completely grainless 11x14 shot at 3200... Hey Tom, Can you explain this to me. I have a hard time understanding why one would want a grainless 11X14 shot at 3200. When I think of of ISO 3200, I think "nightime" and "grainy." What shooting condition are

Re: Grainless at 3200 was: Re: Slides vs digital

At 08:14 PM 9/4/2001 -0700, you wrote: >From: tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Imagine a completely grainless 11x14 shot at 3200... > >Hey Tom, > >Can you explain this to me. I have a hard time understanding why one would >want a grainless 11X14 shot at 3200. For the same reasons you'd ever want a g

RE: Zoom 90-WR question

Of course I can't find my manual tonight so I may mess up some features. Drive Button - 1-self timer, 2-multi timer? 3-"motor drive" mode (slow) 4-multi exposure 5 interval (set between every 10 sec to every 60 min by holding drive button and pressing zoom buttons) Flash button - If flash