I may go ahead and shoot B&W. I'm more interested in the people than
the cars. However, I'll probably shoot a roll or so of color just to
see how it reacts under the lights. I just can't imagine using a
flah. Heck, I don't even know how to work one.
I liked your earlier idea about using a
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brewer"
Subject: Re: PUG 2003 Themes
It was a =joke=, Bill...
But still, it might be interesting to see the interpretations.
Oops. Sorry, I thought you were sewious. OTOH, it might
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
At 09:31 PM 11/15/01 -0600, you wrote:
>If anyone has the time I'd appreciate any critique on the following image:
I love the lighting and composition.
Gary J. Sibio
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don'
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:14 PM
Subject: Re: Auro Show Snaps
I don't use flash. I don't own a flash. Flash is intrusive and
annoying for the type of photography that I do.
Simple solutio
At 08:58 AM 11/15/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Just a poll:
>Where do you buy your film?
B&H or Adorama
Gary J. Sibio
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://p
Earlier this month a major office building in the area was wrapped in an
American flag. I shot a number of frames of this unique event, and
here's one that I'd like to share with you all. Hope you enjoy it, and
feel free to comment.
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/flagbldg.html
--
Shel Be
Paul Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >From my calculations it should start at 4:00am in Melbourne. As its 1:00 am
> for HK and 2:00am for Tokyo and Melbourne is 3 hours infront of HK and 2
> hours in front of Tokyo.
>
> What times sunrise in Sydney and Melbourne at the moment?
not sure, but here in Byron
Hi Mafud:
I'm probably not entirely serious about scanning everything!
However, I do have a collection of negatives and slides which I have been asked
to give to a web-based institute, as they are an almost unique record of a
particular place taken between 1967-69, and they number several hundre
With it being overcast here I ended up going into Ft. Lauderdale to
take
some shots. Not much to speak of but at least I got out. I ended up visiting
some pawn shops and camera shops. I think I hit paydirt!
I found this neat little camera shop that repairs cameras. They did
not
ha
In a message dated 11/15/01 11:14:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> I don't use flash. I don't own a flash. Flash is intrusive and
>
May I then forewarn you you won't be happy with the color rendition of ~any~
image you take under all that mixed lighting? Not only w
It's all going to depend on how many there really are. If it's a storm, I
don't plan to leave my shutter open for much more than a minute, possibly a
good deal less, otherwise they will wipe each other out on the film. If
there's only 1 a minute or so, then I'll probably use a longer exposure.
T
In a message dated 11/15/01 3:13:50 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This certainly hasn't been my experience of them.
Your experience is ~rare~ with B&H, on the phone or in person. If you
remember, they are New Yorkers. But their vast inventories, order taking
procedur
Hi,
>From my calculations it should start at 4:00am in Melbourne. As its 1:00 am
for HK and 2:00am for Tokyo and Melbourne is 3 hours infront of HK and 2
hours in front of Tokyo.
What times sunrise in Sydney and Melbourne at the moment?
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Waterson" <
What's to critique? An excellent image! I can see nothing that needs improvement.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Delano Mireles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax discuss pdml.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:31 PM
Subject: Critique request
| If anyone h
> I may be wrong in this but I think the OM-10 has OTF metering only in the
flash
> mode while the more professional single digit OM's (OM2/3/4) have OTF in
both
> flash and ambient light metering.
> BTW, it's a lovely camera and part of a truly great system.
> RK
If my understanding of the manua
Bill Owens wrote:
> I'm anxiously awaiting the Big Brown Truck with the first component of my
> desire to wax nostalgic and have cameras I have owned and liked in the past.
> The first is an Olympus OM-10 with the GC manual adapter and 50/1.8 lens,
> which should arrive today or tomorrow.
>
> Is
I don't use flash. I don't own a flash. Flash is intrusive and
annoying for the type of photography that I do.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You might test a flash indoors to see what I mean.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/pow/enter_pow.html
http
Richard Seaman wrote:
> folks,
>
> Here's a NASA website talking about the upcoming Leonid shower:
>
> http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast08nov_1.htm
That all looks good for us in Australia, but I dont know what time I should
be looking?
anyone?
Kevin
-
This message is from the Pentax-
I buy all my film from Don's Photo. Since I work there, it makes sense...
:)
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Juan J. Buhler wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I put together a page of pictures I took when meeting other people
> from the list. Nothing great photographically (some are almost good,
> though) but a nice collection of good moments.
>
> http://www.jbuhler.com/html/pdml.html
That's
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Jim Apilado wrote:
> I purchase all my wedding film (Fuji) from B & H in NYC. Heck. Let's
> say I buy most of my film from them. Locally, Portland OR, I like to
> buy the 12 exposure rolls of Fujicolor from Ritz Camera. Short of
> bulk loading B&W film, I wish I could get
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> > John Mustarde wrote:
> >
> >> Last Friday I finally got all my 78 rpm records transferred
> >> to 8-track tapes. So what's next?
> >>
> But John, that's a technological step backwards! You should be
> transferring those 78s to wax cylinders, which
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:11 PM
Subject: Buying a scanner
> Also I might be able to get a scanner so I need you opinion on which
> brand
> and model is best for around $500. Sorry my budget
Todd,
I have not heard of this lens. Do you know where I might be able to find
out more about this lens? I'm intrigued by the thought of a fisheye.
Thanks,
Delano
on 11/15/01 9:42 PM, Todd Stanley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have found the 19mm Vivitar reasonably sharp, but flare prone
folks,
Here's a NASA website talking about the upcoming Leonid shower:
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast08nov_1.htm
There's a great looking photo on the site, taken with a fisheye over a four
hour period.
The Leonids are annual, and this one's supposed to be much better than the
19
I have found the 19mm Vivitar reasonably sharp, but flare prone and poor
contrast. Seems well built though. It is in the same price range is the
Zenitar 16mm fisheye. The Zenitar is a better lens in almost every aspect
(about the only way the Vivitar is better is that you can use any filter
wit
If anyone has the time I'd appreciate any critique on the following image:
http://www.photocritique.net/g/s?00n2Vn
Thank you!
Delano
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
Me: What does "Digital" mean? All photos submitted to PUG have been
digitized.
Bill: I dunno, it was just a word that popped into my head.
Me again: Okay...barring further clarification, it's an open month.
Me: What does "Professional" mean? (Heck, I'm a professional, but
not in photography.)
Haven't I answered this before?
The huge reason is that majordomo does not have this capacity. Since it doesn't,
someone would have to build a hack. That someone would have to be someone other than
me, because A.) I have no time and B.) I have no interest in spending the time to
build a redun
> http://homepage.mac.com/simonster/PhotoAlbum3.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Richard Seaman writes:
> I know what a "professional" is when applied to a person, but what
> qualifies a photo to appear in the PUG "professional" gallery?
>
> Does it have to be a photo shot for money?
It doesn't say anything about professional photography. I like the idea as its
I was reading that to shoot meteors, you should
use the widest angle lens possible and do
5-to-10-minute exposures. Does anyone here have
any tips they'd like to share? This will be my
first meteor shower.
Thanks,
Amita
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
When I need some "last minute" film for a job, I will buy at Citizens. It
still is cheaper to buy at B&H even with the shipping added.
I use to buy at Camera World in their retail store downtown. They were
still higher than B&H but I was a loyal customer, having started with them
way back in the
I have the above lens for sale. I'll take the first $35.00 plus $5.00 shipping.
If you are interested please reply OFF LIST to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The glass is clean and it works perfectly. The only distraction is a very little paint
loss around the filter ring.
Believe me, it 'it's =very= litt
B&H for everything but the Kodak Gold 100, which I get at K-Mart for less than $1.35
per roll.
Bill Sawyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cory or Brenda Waters
Sent: November 15, 2001 8:59 AM
Just a poll:
Where do you buy your film?
Cory W
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, lbparis wrote:
> The word professional has changed in meaning over the past
> several decades. At one time there weren't a lot of professions
> because there had to be a clear path to a professorship in the
> career field to be one. Now, all one has to do to be considered
>
If memory serves, Olympus guaranteed reliable exposure down to 2 seconds but the
camera will actually go much longer.
Reciprocity and all that kicks in so I guess they figured they'd best not claim too
much.
ppro
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
The word professional has changed in meaning over the past
several decades. At one time there weren't a lot of professions
because there had to be a clear path to a professorship in the
career field to be one. Now, all one has to do to be considered
a professional is to earn a living doing whate
TO BAD IT DOES NOT ACCEPT PENTAX GLASS
BOB RAPP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Studdert
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: First 6-mp full-frame digital SLR is out
On 15 Nov 2001, at 14:19, R
Thursday, November 15, 2001, 6:27:07 PM, Robert wrote:
RH> William Robb wrote:
>> Find something else to talk about.
RH> Why? This is so much fun.
RH> Bob
Cause you are hijacking "my" thread... I didn't want to start another
"discussion" - only future will tell, and it really doesn't matter to
Thursday, November 15, 2001, 6:55:48 AM, Mike wrote:
MJ> Len wrote:
>> Except, perhaps, for the Olympus E-10 and E-20n which SLRs with
>> manual zoom, and will zoom just as fast as you want. They're
>> priced a lot lower than Nikon and Canon SLR digitals. DPReview
>> is a good place to read abou
Well, if they put them into full auto mode, the pictures should
be pretty sharp and well exposed. The days of photography
courses that insist on fully manual cameras for the students are
pretty much over. I've seen messages posted here that support
doing that because it frees the mind to concent
Wednesday, November 14, 2001, 5:31:30 PM, Tom wrote:
TR> I do not have experience submitting digital photos to a newspaper, but I do
TR> know that most such photos have been taken with a 2000-2500 ppi SLR such as
TR> the Kodak DCS *20 series or the Canon D30. In fact the old AP2000 was a 2000
TR>
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:29:10 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have the chance to get a 200 f/4 macro lens, but I have no clue what a
>reasonable
>price for this lens is. Can anyone help?
>
The Pentax A* 200/4 ED IF macro sold new for $950 US at B&H and other
repuitable mail-order companies. It alway
I am ~assuming~ that you are talking about the A*
200mm f4 macro (not the new FA*). The A* version comes
up rarely on e-bay and they seem to sell for around
$850 U.S. That is aproximately what I paid for mine in
like-new condition with a soft case and a B+W UV
filter attached. Mind you, though, th
Thanks for the kind words, Gianfranco. I agree -- that wood in the
background bothers me a bit too. Amazing how much 210mm will compress
foreground and background. Would have liked to get closer to the girls and
use a wider lens, but I didn't dare distract them any more that I already
was. :-)
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:58 PM
Subject: PUG 2003 Themes
Okay, Bill:
What does "Digital" mean? All photos submitted to PUG have been
digitized.
I dunno, it was just a word that popped into
On 15 Nov 2001, at 8:58, Cory or Brenda Waters wrote:
> Just a poll:
> Where do you buy your film?
L&P Photographics in Artarmon (North Sydney), good prices and plenty of
big fridges but shipping might be a little expensive for you though.
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9
On 15 Nov 2001, at 14:19, Rob Brigham wrote:
> And at $6500 US!
>
> This is inside the tantaive price spoken by Pentax for the MZ-D.
Hi Rob,
Pentax never made claims about the price, the figure that was floating about
was a speculated price only based on the cost of one off CCD purchase that
Albano wrote:
> The police asked some more data, a handshake and I went back to work with
the
> biggest smile and happiness you can imagine
I hope that among the data there wasn't your address!
And then:
> / Thanks. We have a football cheer song that claims "Policia
> Federal, la verguen
Hi Bill,
It's really a wonderful shot!
If I have to find something to critique, the girl dressed in red
suffers from the dark wooden truss (?) in the background right
over her head, which is a bit disturbing, but it's almost
splitting hairs...
Well done!
Gianfranco
- Original Message -
Okay, Bill:
What does "Digital" mean? All photos submitted to PUG have been
digitized.
What does "Professional" mean? (Heck, I'm a professional, but not in
photography.)
Thanks,
Joe
P.S. I thought Synchronicity was being dropped.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubs
Hi all,
http://www.photocritique.net/g/s?zzn33n-p15121403
As always, comments and criticisms appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Bill Peifer
Rochester, NY
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visi
On Thursday, November 15, 2001, at 02:40 PM, Delano Mireles wrote:
> Along the same lines, I just saw on BH a Sigma 24mm 2.8 - any comments
> on
> this as well?
I have the manual focus one and I'm quite fond of it. Flare control
isn't great (even with the dinky hood), but it's nice and sharp
> Bill Owens wrote:
>
> >MacBurt wrote:
> >> WHY CAN"T WE LOOK LIKE THIS???
> >
> > BECAUSE DOUG DOESN'T HAVE THE TIME OR FUNDS TO DO THIS.
>
> NOT BAD BILL BUT YOU SHOULDA USED SOME EXCLAMATION MARKS!!!
>
> --
> Mark Roberts
> www.robertstech.com
Darn, I knew I forgot
i buy from the film shop in new york. fuji reala mostly. when you buy
$100.00 worth the shipping is free. delivery is about two days .
Received: from smtpin-102-4.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.55) by
storefull-162.iap.bryant.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2001
09:36:37 -0800 (PST)
Receiv
Juan J. Buhler wrote:
>When you have problems with an order, B&H is usually excellent.
This certainly hasn't been my experience of them. when they had a problem
verifying a credit card of mine once, they delayed my shipment for nearly a
week and were extremely rude and unhelpful, especially when
Some answers to great PDMLers:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Congratulations Albano!
Great story (and a happy ending, no less)
Thanks, Mark.
Tom C wrote:
Glad you got your LX back! Good you stood your ground. Too bad there's
jerks out there like that. Makes you wonder if some of the police ar
In a message dated 11/15/01 1:52:21 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I don't use flash. So, with that in mind, would you suggest an 800
> speed film over a 400 speed film? I never heard of a faster film
> "neutralizing" color cast. Why is that?
>
I suggested an 800 speed
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" <
Subject: Re: OT: CD-RW Question
> Very true. There's a lot to be said for having a local place
to go to when
> something goes wrong. But there are alternatives to CompUSA.
There are plenty of
> small, independent copmuter shops around; you jus
Bill Owens wrote:
>MacBurt wrote:
>> WHY CAN"T WE LOOK LIKE THIS???
>
> BECAUSE DOUG DOESN'T HAVE THE TIME OR FUNDS TO DO THIS.
NOT BAD BILL BUT YOU SHOULDA USED SOME EXCLAMATION MARKS!!!
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Along the same lines, I just saw on BH a Sigma 24mm 2.8 - any comments on
this as well?
thanks,
Delano
> From: Delano Mireles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:30:11 -0600
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Low budget WA?
>
> With a couple of birt
Jim...
Have you shopped at Citizen's Photo for film? I'm curious to see how their
prices compare to B&H. Obviously B&H will be cheaper, but by how much?
t
On 11/15/01 6:27 AM, Jim Apilado wrote:
> I purchase all my wedding film (Fuji) from B & H in NYC. Heck. Let's say I
> buy most of my film
One vote for B&H...
On 11/15/01 5:58 AM, Cory or Brenda Waters wrote:
> Just a poll:
> Where do you buy your film?
>
> Cory Waters
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax
With a couple of birthday's on the horizon and Christmas around the corner
the budget is a little tight but I'm constantly looking for a little more
"space" in certain shots.
Does anyone have any experience with the 19mm Vivitar? I realize this by
far no pro lens but it "affords" me a wider angl
Sheesh, first Shel looks like Hannibal Lecter, now Gianfranco turns out
to look like Stanley Kubrick!
Why can't I look like Tom Cruise? Why why WHY?
-Aaron
who looks more like Ed from Barenaked Ladies
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Bob Walkden wrote:
> good story. Which scanner, printer, paper and ink/pigment did he
> eventually choose?
Yes, tell us Mike! Some of us also shoot a Leica with 50mm Summicron,
and would like to know what's better to print digitally than the piezo
setup!
Piezo prints also
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Cory or Brenda Waters wrote:
> Just a poll:
> Where do you buy your film?
Usually at B&H in New York.
The last order went to filmshop.com, which was a bit cheaper than B&H.
Service was just as good, but I didn't have any problems. When you
have problems with an order, B&H i
Sorry Netscape users.
I just fixed it, and checked the page on Netscape for Win2000.
The URL, again, is
http://www.jbuhler.com/html/pdml.html
(not that the pictures are really worth all that anticipation)
Apologies,
j
--
-
> WHY CAN"T WE LOOK LIKE THIS???
BECAUSE DOUG DOESN'T HAVE THE TIME OR FUNDS TO DO THIS.
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax User
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
> Juan J. Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://www.jbuhler/com/html/pdml.hmtl
>
> Hi Juan,
>
> Are you sure the URL is correct? I'm not able to open the page.
> Am I doing something wrong?
Sorry, my mistake. Make that slash a dot:
> > htt
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, tom wrote:
> They work on IE, not netscape.
>
> The end of the table and the body seem not to be coded...
Oh gosh, I always do that. Sorry guys. I'll fix it right away.
Ever since I switched to Opera I end up not realizing when I have
unfinished tables in my pages...
Give
START START START START
In a message dated 11/15/01 7:43:20 AM, MacBurt writes:
Several times I've written and asked why this site cannot use a numbered
index. It is easier to look at a numbered index and then find a numbered
entry. It is easier then attempting to read similiar entries from
I usually buy from New York, either B&H (www.bhphotovideo.com) or Adorama
(www.adorama.com). I have to pay about $6 ups charges, but you can save far
more than that if buying a reasonable amount (I usually get at least 10
rolls at a time, usually 20 and stash it in the fridge). For me it's mainly
Hi,
The way I read the article, the camera is not yet "out" but will be
available in February. Let's see if it actually hits the stores and
will find its way into the hands of consumers.
Mike Johnston wrote:
>
> The Contax N1 is finally out, using the full-frame 24x36mm 6-megapixel
> Philips
No pics on my system
Bill Owens wrote:
>
> Gosh, I had no idea Shel was even bigger than I am.
> > This works:
> >
> > http://www.jbuhler.com/html/pdml.html
> >
> > Gianfranco
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/pow/enter_pow.html
-
This messag
Thanks for that tidbit. I found it strange that the lens was so
light. When I get home I will have to look at the specs of the 300 f/4
Takumar and compare.
I do not see myself using the lens much, but then again you never
know. But there was no way I was going to walk away from
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill D. Casselberry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tele-Takumar 300 f6.3
>
> Paul wrote:
>
> > It takes a smaller filter if memory serves correctly, and other
> > than that,
Gosh, I had no idea Shel was even bigger than I am.
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This works:
>
> http://www.jbuhler.com/html/pdml.html
>
> Gianfranco
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
v
Although I'll never buy one I like the looks, sort of like a digital Maxxum
9.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Johnston
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: First 6-mp full-frame digit
Hi Dick,
That's strange, I have no problems with the photos.
You are not able to see even the thumbnails?
There should be 14 of them.
Gianfranco
- Original Message -
From: dick graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: Me
Rob Brigham wrote:
> And at $6500 US!
>
> Thanks for nothing Pentax - you have now officially MISSED THE BOAT!!!
What's new? :)
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Use
More fun would be an M39>M42 and an M42>K plus the AF 1.7x AF and have
autofocus Leica lenses on a Pentax body.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Brogden
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
800 ASA and no tripod
>From: "Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Film for ballet performance
>Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 01:39:16 -0600
>
>My niece is performing in Chicago this weekend (Friday, so I'm looking for
>help today Th
Cory or Brenda Waters wrote:
> Just a poll:
> Where do you buy your film?
B&H or Adorama.
Of course, I can visit them -- I don't know if I would want to use mail
order these days, with the threat of irradiation of mail coming up.
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To un
Mike Johnston wrote:
[snip]
I have in my own collection several LARGE prints...
> (larger than 11x14) that look superb.
>
> A photorealistic printer in this day and age costs $200-$300. The Epson C80,
> the Canon S600. Both capable of gorgeous output up on up to letter size
> sheets. Certainly
I get it to open but I can't find the PDMLers pics. Where are they?
DG
At 03:34 AM 11/15/01 -0800, you wrote:
>This works:
>
>http://www.jbuhler.com/html/pdml.html
>
>Gianfranco
>
>
>--- Gianfranco Irlanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Juan J. Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > http:
I buy all my Velvia and Provia at the local camera store...
Christian Skofteland
> -Original Message-
> From: Cory or Brenda Waters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Just a poll:
> Where do you buy your film?
>
> Cory Waters
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubs
I purchase all my wedding film (Fuji) from B & H in NYC. Heck. Let's say I
buy most of my film from them. Locally, Portland OR, I like to buy the 12
exposure rolls of Fujicolor from Ritz Camera. Short of bulk loading B&W
film, I wish I could get BW film in 12 exposures.
Jim A.
> From: "Cory o
And at $6500 US!
This is inside the tantaive price spoken by Pentax for the MZ-D.
Sounds like Pentax had a change of heart then, because the sensor is
obviously available, and it can be done for the money that was rumoured.
Thanks for nothing Pentax - you have now officially MISSED THE BOAT!!!
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 14, 2001, at 08:24 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
>
> > And will meet you at 12:00 Noon on Friday, November 16, 2001 at Camera
> > World
> > with my 4x6 digital print that is equal to or better than the average
> > minilab print.
>
> Cue the music from "The
MacBurt wrote:
>Several times I've written and asked why this site cannot use a numbered
>index. It is easier to look at a numbered index and then find a numbered
>entry. It is easier then attempting to read similiar entries from a long
>list, unnumbered.
List maintainer Doug Brewer answered you
In a message dated 15/11/01 10:32:47 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I've been looking at a Tokina AT-X 24-40mm F2.8 to replace some of the
primes I own.
Is this a good lens? How much is a reasonable price for it?
Hiroto >>
Hiro
Miyama have one listed in their ad this m
For slides, EPT or EPJ (do they still make these?), or if no tungsten then
possibly Fuji Multispeed. For prints the Fuji Press 800 is admirable.
I shot indoor sports on 400-1600asa, lens apertures generally 2.8 and wider.
Kind regards
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
> John Mustarde wrote:
>
>> Last Friday I finally got all my 78 rpm records transferred
>> to 8-track tapes. So what's next?
>>
But John, that's a technological step backwards! You should be
transferring those 78s to wax cylinders, which are easily listened to
with a pin and a piece of paper.
Just a poll:
Where do you buy your film?
Cory Waters
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
The Contax N1 is finally out, using the full-frame 24x36mm 6-megapixel
Philips CCD. See:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0111/0501contaxn1digital.asp
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
On Wednesday, November 14, 2001, at 08:24 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
> And will meet you at 12:00 Noon on Friday, November 16, 2001 at Camera
> World
> with my 4x6 digital print that is equal to or better than the average
> minilab print.
Cue the music from "The Good, The Bad And The Ugly".
-Aaron
On Thursday, November 15, 2001, at 05:21 AM, Bob Rapp wrote:
> I'm particularly interested in the responses. I personally think that
> digital is a long way from replacing B&W. I doubt that there are many
> printers available at any cost that can do justice to the full grey
> scale of
> a B&W p
Bob R. wrote:
> I'm particularly interested in the responses. I personally think that
> digital is a long way from replacing B&W. I doubt that there are many
> printers available at any cost that can do justice to the full grey scale of
> a B&W print.
You haven't seen enough Piezography prints y
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
