Steve Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it me, or is the Ricoh XR-M a copy of the SF1n?
It's you, Steve. If you've ever peered through an XR-M, you'd know what I
mean. The interface looks like the cockpit of a jet fighter. And TTL side
flash, like the Contax T* and Olympus XA series of
As I understand it, the SMC-M 100/4 macro will do 0.5x magnification on its
own, but is capable of 1x with an extension tube - what length tube would I
need to get this capability?
Thanks.
-Matt
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Paul,
I have one of those side XR flashes, but the latch that keeps it down when
not in use, is broken. Would you know if they are repairable?
If I don't use it, I have to remove it from the camera to avoid battery
drain.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Paul F. Stregevsky [EMAIL
After a very quick look at this month's PUG so pictures jumped
out at me.
Flavio's Mesita something about this photo appeals to me I just
not sure what.
Ann Sanfedele's Mirror and Window, San Francisco the warmth of
the wall makes this picture for me.
Tadek van Bussel's Caramel Macchiato
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: woo hoo
What's with the fear the turtle business, though?
'Fear the Turtle': Maryland Wins NCAA Tournament.
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
On Monday, April 1, 2002, at 11:00 PM, Butch Black wrote:
Does anyone know how the new Ilford Gallerie smooth gloss compares to
Pictorico Photo gallery glossy paper and glossy white film? I understand
they both use a microporus ceramic coating, is this correct? I love the
Pictorico line but
On Monday, April 1, 2002, at 05:51 PM, Brendan wrote:
I bet if it were Kodak Gold 200 they would have no
problem with it, But Agfa XPS isn't EXOTIC .
Sure is if you're a minilab that never sees it. Agfa Portrait is not
exactly as common a film as Kirkland or Gold Max.
-Aaron
-
This
On Monday, April 1, 2002, at 07:22 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I've never heard of it either. Perhaps extinct instead of exotic?
Agfa XPS is the three-letter code for Agfa Portrait. It is quite
certainly still in production and easily available, as long as you have
an Agfa dealer near by.
My Alma Matter.
Go Treps!
Christian
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 00:09, tom wrote:
This
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tom/little_crow.html
is a picture I took at the University of Maryland with a Pentax lens.
Fear the turtle.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
http://webhome.idirect.com/~trini/photo/17.jpg
Aargh, Toronto is collapsing!
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
And Tom was practicing for the ravens on Grandfather Mountain.
Bill KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:58 AM
Subject: Re: woo hoo
Ravens are crows, technically. As the Yeoman
Don't know about you guys, but we see an awful lot of Imation junk come
through our lab.
Bill KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: O T Venting anger with chain
On Tuesday, April 2, 2002, at 12:09 AM, tom wrote:
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tom/little_crow.html
He looks rather interested in what you're doing.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
Good thing Franks away on holiday'sG
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 09:18:08 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: FA 28-105 or FA 28-70 ?
http://webhome.idirect.com/~trini/photo/17.jpg
Aargh, Toronto is
I just needed an excuse to post something Terrapin-related.
Sorry, I'd had a couple o' Basses. ;)
tv
On 2 Apr 2002 at 9:07, Bill Owens wrote:
And Tom was practicing for the ravens on Grandfather Mountain.
Bill KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Mark
Evan Hanson wrote:
After a very quick look at this month's PUG so pictures jumped
out at me.
Flavio's Mesita something about this photo appeals to me I just
not sure what.
I agree - it was a real still life for one thing.
Ann Sanfedele's Mirror and Window, San Francisco the warmth
Hmmm. Looked fine on my old netscape 4.6 browser, Tiger.
ann
Tiger Moses wrote:
The pic by Satish Kumar isn't linked properly
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
Mark Roberts wrote:
Ravens are crows, technically. As the Yeoman Warders at the Tower of London will
tell you (or at least they told me), they're the largest member of the crow
family.
I know I know, but ravens have lots more character and don't hang out in
gangs,
They are friendlier to
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele
Subject: Re: April Pug
Hmmm. Looked fine on my old netscape 4.6 browser, Tiger.
ann
The back and next links are not working.
William Robb
Tiger Moses wrote:
The pic by Satish Kumar isn't linked properly
-
This message is from the
First impressions are favorable. The build is up to Pentax standards. The focus is
buttery smooth, like my best-focusing lens, a Kiron 105/2.8 1:1 macro. The focusing
ring travels 180 degrees.
The multicoating is a beautiful blue and the glass is immaculate. The body has no mars
or scratches.
tom wrote:
I just needed an excuse to post something Terrapin-related.
Sorry, I'd had a couple o' Basses. ;)
all is forgiven. And my mate won the office pool on the
games :) I'll get killed for not getting the reference!
a
tv
On 2 Apr 2002 at 9:07, Bill Owens wrote:
And Tom
Matt Bevers writes:
As I understand it, the SMC-M 100/4 macro will do 0.5x magnification on its
own, but is capable of 1x with an extension tube - what length tube would I
need to get this capability?
Just out taking pictures of fiberglass kows with one of these this
morning.. a
No Brendan, I think this does deserve an answer.. it's called ROR :-)
later,
patbob ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Brendan writes:
WHAT!!! these guys actually think people will fall
for that ( ok don't answer that one ).
AS SEEN ON eBay!
* Tired of slow, sluggish shutter speeds?
* Keep
On Tuesday, April 2, 2002, at 09:17 AM, Bill Owens wrote:
Don't know about you guys, but we see an awful lot of Imation junk come
through our lab.
Mmmm Imation, the world's worst film. ;)
Lucky me, since I don't run a minilab and don't do proofing, I rarely
see even Gold Max. I think we
So, I assume you folks that own a RIcoh XRM have been
happy with this camera body? It has held up well?
WHat exactly do you mean it looks like a jet fighter?
I have not had a chance to look at one of these
before.
Will my Pentax AF200T flash provide TTL flash with
this body?
Thanks again...
I am giving serious thought to this camera. I guess,
based on the responses to my post, there are no older
metal-style bodies that have spot metering? I was
hoping to maybe save a few $'s.
thanks again.
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve,
I think I would recommend the ZX-5n.
Sorry, one more question for ZX 5N owners. I would
prefer to buy this camera without the date back, but
it seems that every dealer in the US sells it with the
date back? Has anyone found a place to buy one
without the date back?
Thanks for your help!
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damn...
and here I was going to bring in some Kodak 126 film for you to proof and
print for me from my Instamatic.
Oh well...
Cheers,
Dave ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron Reynolds
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:24 AM
To:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Steve Pearson wrote:
Sorry, one more question for ZX 5N owners. I would
prefer to buy this camera without the date back, but
it seems that every dealer in the US sells it with the
date back? Has anyone found a place to buy one
without the date back?
I bought mine from
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, David Chang-Sang wrote:
and here I was going to bring in some Kodak 126 film for you to proof and
print for me from my Instamatic.
I want to dig out my disc camera, now, and see if I can track down film
for it.
--
http://www.infotainment.org
The destructive
I realize I could turn that feature off. I just don't
want to pay extra for a feature that I will never use.
I've had a Super Program for 20+ years and never
needed a date back. So, the camera that came from
KEH-Did it have a date back on it or not? Just
curious..
--- gfen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve,
Surprisingly, you will pay extra to not have that feature. I suspect
that the cost to Pentax between the two backs has more to do with
volume than the feature. Since all the other ZX bodies use the same
back, it is cheaper to just supply the date back. When I have seen
the ZX-5n
Sorry, Jeff, I've never owned that camera (or its dedicated side flash). So I don't
know if it's repairable, but I doubt a repair would be cost-effective. Adorama has one
of the side flashes in its Used Ricoh gear, and Google can usually turn up a few.
Jeff wrote: Paul,
I have one of those
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Steve Pearson wrote:
needed a date back. So, the camera that came from
KEH-Did it have a date back on it or not? Just
curious..
Guess I neglected to mention that part.. yes, it did.
--
http://www.infotainment.org
The destructive character is cheerful. -
No but you can just shut it off, MY MZ-3 has the date
back always off, you can also pull the battery to
really make sure it doesn't work.
--- Steve Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, one more question for ZX 5N owners. I would
prefer to buy this camera without the date back, but
it
Well, they aren't actually charging any more for the date back, if it's the
money you're concerned about. If it isn't the money, just don't put a
battery in the date back. It uses a separate battery. I think having the
ability to put the date on a picture is valuable when you are shooting
Hi folks,
Can anyone tell me off-hand whether the lugs on all the medium-format bodies
are the same size? For instance, will a pair of lug clips (is that the
right terminology) for a 67 II also fit on the earlier 6x7/67 lugs?
Conversely, will the lug clips for a 645 fit on the 6x7/67/67 II
In a message dated 4/2/2002 8:46:12 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry, one more question for ZX 5N owners. I would
prefer to buy this camera without the date back, but
it seems that every dealer in the US sells it with the
date back? Has anyone found a place to
In a message dated 4/2/2002 9:08:29 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I realize I could turn that feature off. I just don't
want to pay extra for a feature that I will never use.
I've had a Super Program for 20+ years and never
needed a date back. So, the camera that
Greetings from Idaho,
Winterhawk Photography, Inc. is coming along slowly but surely. I'll be
happy to be busy when all of this start-up business is done.
Despite a very slow start, I'm beginning to get business...if it could only
pay. : )
I'll be making a photograph of 'lighting a match'.
I havent had it long enough to pass a judgement on it (i like it so
far). You can see the links below for other people's opinion.
http://www.chem.helsinki.fi/~toomas/photo/ricoh-xrm-review.html
http://www.camerareview.com/templates/reviews.cfm?camera_id=338
I doubt if af200t would give you ttl
Hi Paul,
Don't know if this got through, but I am having emails to you returned, so
will post this to PDML.
...
I was out with my Son this afternoon, and spotted some cameras in a
Jeweller's
Many years ago Gary Larson of Far Side fame penned a cartoon
called Cow Tools. In the cartoon a cow stood beaming over a work
bench of crudely designed tools. The unspoken point being that
if cows made tools, lacking opposable thumbs the tools would
likely be quite primitive. According to
Hi;
This is my first time commenting on the PUG submissions.
Orange; Very interesting lighting. It has an abstract feel to it. What was
the background material?
Fruit: Gorgeous color and saturation. I like the lighting.
Tulip: Great lighting effect on the front tulip.
Summer Blossom: Very
I think that by looking back only to 1990 you miss the
sea state change started by Minolta with the first fully
integrated AF in 1985. Not only did the Minolta 7000
start the AF revolution (yes I know about the Pentax ME-
F and the Nikon F3-AF), but also introduced a whole new
interface.
But the worst has to be re-loaded single use cameras with no-name 100 speed
film in them.
Don't know about you guys, but we see an awful lot of Imation junk come
through our lab.
Mmmm Imation, the world's worst film. ;)
BUTCH
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to
If you really want some:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1343372950
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
Bob Walkden wrote:
Hi,
Tuesday, April 02, 2002, 8:45:21 PM, you wrote:
I know I know, but ravens have lots more character and don't hang out in
gangs,
They are friendlier to humans, [...]
Konrad Lorenz was circumcised by a raven.
and your point is ??? ;)
probably
But the worst has to be re-loaded single use cameras with no-name 100
speed
film in them.
Careful, a list member was seen last August shooting with a re-loaded single
use camera loaded with 400 speed film.
Bill KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
Strange, I was always under the impression that the 80-200 4.7-5.6 wasn't
that good of a lens. I'm not sure where I got that impression...I won't need
a fast lens (will be using 400 or 800 ASA) The idea of getting something
cheap is so I can eventually get a better/faster lens (or wait until
Actually the 80-200 F4.7-5.6 is one lens I regret
selling :-( it was small light and sharp, equal to the
Sigma 70-300 between 80-200 but a bit better contrast
and lets not forget 1/3 the size. The internal zoom
was also very nice, I loved not having the front stick
out 7 while zooming.
---
we prefer the 400 speed
Doug
where =are= those scans?
At 03:36 PM 4/2/02 -0500, you wrote:
But the worst has to be re-loaded single use cameras with no-name 100 speed
film in them.
BUTCH
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Hi Pentaxians the world over,
A very minor update to the PDML UK 2002 website now featuring a confirmed
guest list. I hope to gather some more info and do some more work
tomorrow so finger's crossed a bit more info soon. If you would like to
come along but don't know for sure, hold off until
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:35:45PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what did Pentax do? They made cameras that seemed a
lot like everyone elses with a feature or two they could
call their own: power zoom Hyper Programs for
instance. All the market progress they made in the 70's,
they
I think that by looking back only to 1990 you miss the
sea state change started by Minolta with the first fully
integrated AF in 1985.
It is just where I started my search through the magazines. A decade looked
good to me. I understand it missed a few things.
Ever since that time camera
On Tuesday, April 2, 2002, at 03:02 PM, gfen wrote:
Do you know someone with the film manufacturing equipment, too?
Maybe I could become the sole supplier of disc-film to a disc starved
naition!
...you probably could, and go broke doing it, too. ;)
Remember, if they still have a disc
Brendan
Actually the 80-200 F4.7-5.6 is one lens I regret
selling :-( it was small light and sharp, equal to the
Sigma 70-300 between 80-200 but a bit better contrast
and lets not forget 1/3 the size. The internal zoom
was also very nice, I loved not having the front stick
out 7 while
That's the two zooms I own now, both for my ZX-5n. I think that they
make a good pair. The feel of the zoom ring is far better on the 80-2--
than the 28-70/4. I've had a couple of the latter so I don't think that
it was my particular sample.
William in Utah.
David Spaulding wrote:
That's the two zooms I own now, both for my ZX-5n. I think that they
make a good pair. The feel of the zoom ring is far better on the 80-2--
than the 28-70/4. I've had a couple of the latter so I don't think that
it was my particular sample.
William in Utah.
I'm just north of Utah. Has
In answer to Steve Pearson, who wrote:
Will my Pentax AF200T flash provide TTL flash with
this [Ricoh] body?
Pentax TTL flashes like 200T and 280T (and later ones) won't go TTL
on the Ricoh TTL bodies (XR-P, XR-M etc.). I remember I once put a
280T on a XR-P, trying to fit the Pentax
Hey gang,
Just got back from having my HD devistated by a virus. Apparently it
was one that wiped out nearly everything on the hard drive, including my
bookmark files. Anyone mind sending me PERSONALLY a short list of
bookmarks for PDML?
Thanks,
Illinois Bill
-
This message is from the
Hi,
[snip]
This thread is getting dangerous - I pass g
Yes, time to cut it short...
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I shyed away from the 28-70 F4 for build reasons, the
old F 35-80 is better built but optically short of it.
The 80-200 zoom ring is so nice and smooth, due to the
internal zoom design and I suspect more durable. The
older black finished 80-200 is the one you want, the
49mm filter thread is a
Hi William,
goto http://www.nrg666.com/pdml.shtml
Regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: William Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:44 AM
Subject: Viruses
Hey gang,
Just got back from having my HD devistated by a
Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
[snip]
This thread is getting dangerous - I pass g
Yes, time to cut it short...
You're being redundant: You could have left that message with just the [snip]
;-)
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Brendan
I shyed away from the 28-70 F4 for build reasons, the
old F 35-80 is better built but optically short of it.
The 80-200 zoom ring is so nice and smooth, due to the
internal zoom design and I suspect more durable. The
older black finished 80-200 is the one you want, the
49mm filter
http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1343690403
Merkle Camera in Toronto's got it up for bids..
Currently $199.00 US and the bidding just started... :(
Cheers,
Dave
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
I've been trying to unload an accessory kit for a Yashica rangefinder. The original
buyer never sent the money ($60+), so after a week or so I emailed. His wife replied
that he had had a heart attack, was in grave condition in the hospital, and would not
be out for some time.
Another buyer
On 2 Apr 2002 at 18:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is this Yashica kit the only item I've sold to have this happen--not once,
but twice? It's like the 2001 mystery: Why did three European dealers who
claimed to have the Rikenon 55/1.2K not reply to my emails? That lens; no other.
I have a
- Original Message -
From: Steve Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: Bodies w/ Spot Metering?
Will my Pentax AF200T flash provide TTL flash with
this body?
No, but the Ricoh 300P will.
Jeff.
-
This message is from the
On Tuesday, April 2, 2002, at 06:24 PM, tom wrote:
I have a date in June that's been cancelled twice by separate wedding
clients.
I've never had anyone else cancel.
Leave town that day.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
What does the Yashica kit consist of? I have a Lynx 14
Bill KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:13 PM
Subject: OT: my disappearing buyers (a mystery)
I've been trying to unload an accessory kit
KODAK PLUS-X Pan and PLUS-X Pan Professional Films will be discontinued
in
October, 2002 when stocks are expected to be depleted. As a recommended
alternative, we suggest KODAK PROFESSIONAL T-MAX 100 Film / 100TMX. For
technical information, see KODAK Publication F-4016, KODAK PROFESSIONAL
You captured the one rider going over the log
wall just the way they like them.In Hunters/Jumpers
they want to see themselves at the top of the curve,
the field Hunters/Eventers like to see themselves
comeing out of the arc and or at the bottom of said
curve.
Dave
Good grief, I didn't know
On 2 Apr 2002 at 18:43, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Tuesday, April 2, 2002, at 06:24 PM, tom wrote:
I have a date in June that's been cancelled twice by separate wedding
clients.
I've never had anyone else cancel.
Leave town that day.
I was thinking I'd just crash one of them.
tv
On 2 Apr 2002 at 15:54, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
KODAK PLUS-X Pan and PLUS-X Pan Professional Films will be discontinued
in
October, 2002 when stocks are expected to be depleted.
Yuck.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Another One Bites the Dust
KODAK PLUS-X Pan and PLUS-X Pan Professional Films will be
discontinued
in
October, 2002 when stocks are expected to be depleted. As a
recommended
alternative, we suggest KODAK PROFESSIONAL T-MAX 100 Film
In a message dated 4/2/2002 6:54:58 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KODAK PLUS-X Pan and PLUS-X Pan Professional Films will be discontinued
in
October, 2002 when stocks are expected to be depleted.
Probably due to disappearing users - like me. I quit Plus X ten
Couple's break up. Or something else happens to make them put
off the wedding. Bad luck. I hope you make them pay something
at reservation time. If the prospective bride or groom was an
accident victim, I usually return whatever fee was paid. It
doesn't help keep food on the table but it
In a message dated 4/2/2002 7:14:35 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And I always liked Plus-X. Telling me that T-Max is a
replacement is an insult.
William Robb
-
Grin Consider yourself politely and sympathetically insulted.
Ed Matthew
-
This message is from
Thanks for all the help with the Ricoh info. I bid on
one on Ebay lost it. Oh well-probably a good sign.
Still, I can't believe that there is not one older
Pentax brand body style that has spot metering???
Come on, please, some one tell me there is one. Or
else, I might be forced to get the
I've seen a couple so far, both almost new. Nice pics of the camera- helps
keep me motivated while scrap the cash together to buy one.
Yeah, yeah, I know, notifying the list about stuff from eBay is bad
form,
but still Is this the first MZ-S on eBay?
- Original Message -
From: Amita Guha
Subject: RE: PUG Stuff
The link that was pointed out as broken is fixed.
Hey, are you doing the PUG again?
No.
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Looks like there is an increased interest in ricoh cameras recently and
prices seem to be going up :) I got my xr-m with 50/1.4 ricoh p lens for
$66. I saw body alone with px flashlight go for $102.5 today :)
If you are patient about it, you can get one cheaply enough.
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Another One Bites the Dust
In a message dated 4/2/2002 8:50:29 PM US Eastern Standard
Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cherry picker
companies such as Fuji are bad news for photographers.
William Robb
And why did Kodak
No, some store has been selling NIB MZ-S for some time.
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 10:43 pm, you wrote:
Yeah, yeah, I know, notifying the list about stuff from eBay is bad
form, but still Is this the first MZ-S on eBay?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1343745539
--Mark
I'm considering an equipment change.
Keeping the A100/2.8.
Parting with my A35/2.8, A50/1.4, and Tokina 80-200/2.8.
Replacing them with 43/1.9.
Just an observation, Collin, that you can't really ~replace~ an
80-200 with a 43mm lens - g.
Well, you did say anyone...
Fred
-
This message is
Unfortunately, they buying public (at least US) are very price
sensitive, much more so than quality or choice. So as long as Fuji
sells cheap Super HQ crap, people will buy it. They will acknowledge
Kodak doing much more, but never put their money where there mouth is.
Eventually a company like
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re[4]: Another One Bites the Dust
Unfortunately, they buying public (at least US) are very price
sensitive, much more so than quality or choice. So as long as
Fuji
sells cheap Super HQ crap, people will buy it. They will
acknowledge
This month's PUG features lots of sensual photos...lots of cool
textures, and some that even evoked memories of scents. My favories:
Orange by Thibault Grouas - it looks like a celestial event :)
Juicy by Harald Rust - it just looks so appetizing!
Peachy II by Steve Larson - I could
Did you get it off Ebay, private party, or local
camera store?
Thanks for the info.-that was the camera that I bid on
today! Now that I know what you paid for yours, I'm
glad I didn't win it.
Thanks again!
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
-
This message
- Original Message -
From: Evan Hanson
Subject: Cow Tools
snip
I've been starring at William Robb's Maria
for about 15 minutes and I'm still at a loss to explain what
it
is or why I like it. Can anyone help?
Hi Evan, glad you like it.
I had a lot of fun making that photo.
Having one
In a message dated 4/2/2002 4:14:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Telling me that T-Max is a
replacement is an insult.
Here, here!
Brendan MacRae
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Hi all,
I recently bought a set of 6x7 extension tubes. Soon after I
discovered what I thought to be a bit of a problem; the stop-down
coupling on the #1 tube doesn't spring back into place when you move
it with your finger. Is this normal? I actually opened it up
thinking the spring
Hi,
This may just be my mind at work, but it seems to be fairly
obviously a nude, with the thighs in the background (knees at
the top), shoulder in the left foreground and breast in the
right foreground.
Fairly obviously above is in reference to deciding the subject
matter. For me, it is
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 23:18:38 -0600
Ken Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, some store has been selling NIB MZ-S for some time.
I am thinking of putting my MZ-S on ebay and purchase a 645nII.
Does the 645nII have a digital back available?
Kevin
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hi,
mike wilson wrote:
Too much
Apologies for the excessive quote. It's early here - won't
happen again.
m
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
oh, it was a non-ebay sale hence the low price :) Dont expect to get it
for what i paid since i got a rather good deal. But yeah, 100 is too
much for it (not that it isnt worth it) considering its demand.
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 09:51:23PM -0800, Steve Pearson wrote:
Did you get it off Ebay,
98 matches
Mail list logo
