It was actualy the road after i flew over the car :)
Is the bike fixable? seems a shame to damage a Guzzi.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Raimo Korhonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 5:32 PM
Subject: Vs: Back again
> Your shoulder was worse
I think your points are very good, Collin. I Have been thinking alon the
same lines too. :-)
There was a report to the List this winter that Pentax had set up a new
factory in China to produce digital cameras (which was very positively
received by the stock market, IIRC). To a relatively speaking s
Hi folks,
Any safe places/services on the web where I can upload data files from my
hard drive as temporary backup ? For some reason, my computer has become a
mess and worst part is my CD writer is not working.
Any help, please ..
anand
___
hm...
Looks like a bright future for the FAJ-lenses, then... :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The norm now is a motor driven aperture. The camera tells the lens what
> f/stop it wants, and the lens goes to it.
> They either work, or they don't,
Hi Heiko,
But OTOH you can use your old lenses better than every Nikon D100 or Canon D60/10D user can do.
Well, I wouldn't consider buying into Nikon or Canon. However, getting a
4000 dpi slide scanner for me is an alternative to buying a DSLR.
I have only a SMC-M 50/1.7 and a (often under
On June 14, 2003 09:31 pm, Jostein wrote:
> Valentin,
> I think the diaphragm itself will continue to be made from little metal
> pieces for a pretty good while yet.
>
> Erratic electric contacts will of course cause errors. Unless you have some
> interesting definitions of "erratic", "electric", "
On June 14, 2003 11:40 pm, William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Caveman
> Subject: Re: Velvia was Re: Exposure
>
> > Simple. Follow the ISO standardized method of determining the film ISO
> > rating.
>
> The ISO standardized method is the first thing that is abandoned by
> adv
At a given price point, pan-tilt is usually a better
value. More precise, locks down better, steadier.
Unless you know you need a ballhead (which are easier
to use when recomposition is frequent), stick with
a pan-tilt. This amounts to conventional wisdom
as I understand it, and my experience (3
Speaking of the right time to enter the market with a product, how about
Kodak, and it's 27 exposure "one-time-use camera system [disposable]
DIGITAL cameras?
My Sunday paper came in a plastic wrapper/envelope, with the Kodak adv.
on the outside.
Order Premium prints and you'll get a CD with your i
I think it's just marketing hype. It appears to me that they are selling
the same old disposable at an increased price to include a Photo CD. Not a
bad concept considering that Joe and Jane Sixpack probably don't have a
scanner and/or image editing software, but do have a computer that enables
th
Hi,
I was going to recommend Kturn, but their server is down. Try this:
http://www.streamload.com/?AID=5470617&PID=529358
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Anand DHUPKAR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 3:22 AM
Sub
Also Pentax has a disposable digital camera:
http://www.letsgodigital.nl/webpages/news/df/pentax/single_use_uk.html
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 12:44, Keith Whaley wrote:
> Speaking of the right time to enter the market with a product, how about
> Kodak, and it's 27 exposure "one-time-use camera system
On June 15, 2003 07:44 am, Keith Whaley wrote:
> Speaking of the right time to enter the market with a product, how about
> Kodak, and it's 27 exposure "one-time-use camera system [disposable]
> DIGITAL cameras?
> My Sunday paper came in a plastic wrapper/envelope, with the Kodak adv.
> on the outs
Arnold wrote:
I can't believe that Pentax will leave its 35mm system like that, especially with the
1.5x factor of the digital sensors. More extreme wide-angle lenses must eventually be
coming. hopefully WITH aperture ring, so that they are usable on older cameras,
too, and in * or Limited
Ramesh wrote:
I am planning replace my existing tripd with corbon
fibre tripod, so was thinking about the ball heads.
I have few doubts about them.
Are there any advantages in using ballhead instead of
pan-tilt style ones?
Which is more stable?
REPLY:
I suggest you look into the Berlebach woo
Bruce quoted:
>From photo.net:
"Can anyone think of a single valid reason why a new lens mount should be necessary? "
Ask Canon or Minolta. They did such a stunt and made a lot of business sense.
-- Pål Jensen
If some of you are old enough you might recall that Pentax also had to
change th
And as a serious comment. Canon does a lot of business because they always have the
right product at the right time, with the right technology and performance, not
because they changed camera mounts.
REPLY:
Really? So Canon EOS has nothing to do with the lens mount?
The technology and perform
Caveman:
Minolta also changed mounts, but that did not prevent them to be now in such a poor
shape that they're looking for a buyer for the company (I hear they're in talks with
Konica).
REPLY:
Minolta changed mount and sold 2.000.000 AF cameras of one single, expensive model in
2 years. Nobod
Collin wrote:
Given how technology changes and how fabrication needs
would seem to require some consistency ...
I wonder how many of these were made all in one batch
with the expectation that they'd be sold over time.
Perhaps make 500 (in whole or parts awaiting later assembly)
knowing that the st
Caveman:
They're not taken seriously there either. Otherwise we had heard of a third-party rush
to provide digital backs for the 645 or 67.
REPLY:
There have been "such a rush" even if you haven't heard about it. I know people who
have used a digital back for the 645N(II). The problem is that
Doug wrote:
Why the hell does it matter to you if Paal shoots to his satisfation? Does it affect
your photography even a little bit?
REPLY:
The modus operandi is the following: He doesn't use equipment where you can set
exposure consistently within 1/3s. When I say that I want such possibiliti
William wrote:
I actually quite envy Pål. It would be so much easier to only have to
toss images because I can't compose a picture worth looking at.
I have no problem with his assertion that his images are always
perfectly exposed.
He uses modern equipment that is well calibrated and I expect he k
Nah, Tom, stay where you are.
You can always come into the city for such events (although, as I said, I
didn't plan yesterday, I just happened to walk by and go in).
OTOH, I was awakened by a gunshot last night, at around 11:45. That hasn't
happened in about 2 years now... Must've been someone
I love this place!
ciao,
frank
Caveman wrote:
> Doug Brewer wrote:
> > Why the hell does it matter to you if Paal shoots to his satisfation?
>
> I actually don't care. I just objected to some pompous unsubstantial claims.
>
> cheers,
> caveman
--
"What a senseless waste of human life"
-The Cu
Hi Arnold,
on 15 Jun 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
>>But OTOH you can use your old lenses better than every Nikon D100 or
>>Canon D60/10D user can do.
>Well, I wouldn't consider buying into Nikon or Canon. However, getting
>a 4000 dpi slide scanner for me is an alternative to buying a DSLR.
What was it about the old Canon mount?
Too narrow? Too far from (or too near to)
the film plane? Have Nikon and Pentax been
able to keep cobbling along because their mount
dimensions were more generous? Somewhere this
must have been written about, but I've never
seen an article or discussion.
-L
In VA, if you have sex with a person who is sufficiently incapacitated
that is considered rape. We warn male students about this all the time.
If you are at a party and a women is really drunk, then don't have sex
with her even if she appears to be willing. If a court/jury decides
that you took
This one time, at band camp, "Anand DHUPKAR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Any safe places/services on the web where I can upload data files from my
> hard drive as temporary backup ? For some reason, my computer has become a
> mess and worst part is my CD writer is not working.
>
6 MP is simply good enough for a large number of folks. Sure, the price
of higher MP chips will come down, but 6 MP will be cheaper and DSLR
prices have a long way to fall to compete with film. This a the 35 vs.
MF argument resurrected. The biggest problem with 6 MP is the wide
angle problem.
Hi Heiko,
Well, I might do so, too, if there was no alternative, however I prefer
to first ask Pentax whether they really want me to damage my K- and M
series lenses so that I can use them on the *ist D
That might be the best option - wait and see. Did you contact Pentax
concerning this
Hi Caveman,
> "I suggest to repeat the test using slide film..."
>
I am in the process of doing that, I have some Kodak 100G loaded in
both cameras. I'll see how they come out.
I'd have posted an example but I have no access to a flatbed scanner,
just a slide scanner (not mine, but I can occasi
What about a second hard drive, instead? The same happened to me recently,
and I had several weeks of photos that I hadn't burned to CD.
Coincidentally my hard drive was getting uncomfortably full (above 70%) so I
took the opportunity to install an additional hard drive.
It was such an easy job I
>From Arnold
>I insist that a software update should easily cure the problem. The way
>the *ist and the *ist D are programmed now, in aperture priority mode
>(which really is an "open aperture mode" when there is a K or M lens
>attached) the light meter and the viewfinder information are switched
>
Throat diameter is just one thing. What Canon did was to system engineer
an entire SLR system from a fresh start. This means that folks sat down,
figured out what they wanted the system to do and then figured out the
best way to do it. They determined that electronic control of the lens
was bes
Every serious professional photographer that I have ever read about uses a
ball head. I'm sure there are exceptions but rarely do I see pan tilts
recommended in photography magazines. Maybe it's the magazines I read (outdoor
photographer primarily) but I can't imagine ever using anything but a
At 12:08 PM 6/8/2003 +0200, Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
I do not think so. I think that Pentax's future really lies in the
crippled (AKA FAJ-mount, AKA Kaf3), and if they are to do this thing,
then why not now? For the kinds of customers that Pentax is after, it
really makes sense economically to le
Pål Jensen wrote:
The meter and camera is never wrong.
After so many posts on the subject you're still making this insane claim.
There's no meter with 0% error and mechanical device with 0% tolerances.
Can you understand that ?
cheers,
caveman
Hi
I want to quit using close-up filters and start using a macro lens for
flowers, insects, etc. Which lens would be a good place to start?
Thanks,
Tony
Pål Jensen wrote:
Doug wrote:
Why the hell does it matter to you if Paal shoots to his satisfation? Does it affect
your photography even a little bit?
REPLY:
The modus operandi is the following: He doesn't use equipment where you can set
exposure consistently within 1/3s.
Trying to change the s
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Every serious professional photographer that I have
> ever read about uses a
> ball head
That is what made me think about ballhead.
Thanks
Rameh
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Well, if they were on a disk that rotated the proper hole into the lens
axis, fixed stops would be just as quick as diaphragm stops. Would probably
work better on a P&S type camera though.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Zentena" <[E
Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What was it about the old Canon mount?
>Too narrow? Too far from (or too near to)
>the film plane? Have Nikon and Pentax been
>able to keep cobbling along because their mount
>dimensions were more generous? Somewhere this
>must have been written about,
Hi,
Vivitar Series 1 90-180/4.5 or Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5 with 1:1 adapter,
coupled with an LX you have a great macro system.
Accessory #1) 58mm male to 58mm male filter ring.
Accessory #2) Vivitar Series 1 28/1.9 for reverse-mounting on 90/2.5
with 1:1 adapter for extreme close ups.
Steve Lar
Pal wrote:
> Light ballheads are sturdier than light pan/tilt
> heads simply because theres more material going into
> a pan/tilt head.
Thanks for technical explanation.
Thanks for everybody for responding.
Regards
Ramesh
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now
I started with Pentax FA 50mm macro and then added
Pentax FA 100mm macro.
My suggestion is you can start directly with 100mm
macro and for most of the people 100mm may be enought
for macro work. You may not need 200mm macro.
Coming brand I think Pentax or Sigma.
No need to tell; Pentax is really
One with around 100mm focal length. Doubles as a portrait lens too.
Inexpensive options:
- Pentax FA 100/3.5 (autofocus)
- Vivitar S1 90/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5, Tokina ATX 90/2.5 (manual focus)
Expensive options:
- Pentax F or FA 100/2.8, Sigma EX 105/2.8 (autofocus)
- Pentax A 100/2.8 (manual focus)
I was referring to f2.8 verions.
--- Ramesh Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I started with Pentax FA 50mm macro and then added
> Pentax FA 100mm macro.
> My suggestion is you can start directly with 100mm
> macro and for most of the people 100mm may be
> enought
> for macro work. You may not n
You left out the Sigma 50/2.8 manual focus EX. I don't think autofocus would
help me much for macro work.
Doon
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002
- Original Message -
From: "Caveman" <[EM
--- Tony Cogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> I want to quit using close-up filters and start
> using a macro lens for
> flowers, insects, etc. Which lens would be a good
> place to start?
>
> Thanks,
> Tony
>
>
Hi,
I use the FA50mm most. For larger magnifications I
prefer the 50mm over t
I am very happy with Vivitar Series 1 105/2.5 (which is the same as Kiron 105/2.5); does 1:1 without extensions, great build, backwards focusing direction (compared to Pentax lenses). It can be had for <$120 in great condition.
Mishka
From: Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Which macro len
In a message dated 6/15/2003 2:25:25 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> You have an artists eye, lovely composition and execution.
Whoa, THANKS!
Marnie aka Doe :-)
Hi Jens,
both cameras have no aperture simulator but we do know that after
properly setting the according custom function the *ist and a
pre-production *ist D can work with K and M lenses
- either in "metered open aperture mode" (aka "aperture priority mode")
in which the aperture stays open al
Or Tamron 90mm/2.8 Autofocus. I have this lens, highly recommended.
The impression I have from reading various tests and user experiences:
you can't go wrong with any of the 90~100mm macro lenses. The
differences are not big. If I had to choose again, I might go for the
the F or FA100mm/2.8 Pentax
Nice job, Marnie!
keith whaley
Some P.S. thoughts:
Not too many wide open spaces in Contra Costa County anymore, are there?
I loved that barn shot!
I lived in Concord, way back in '58-'63, and a revisit in about '95 left
my head reeling!
My little house, in a very small, quiet community of 2 B.R.
They have promised more lenses in the fall. This in their press release and
also circulating in the rumor mill. The press release says it is lenses
suited for the *istD something I think means wide angles. Some PDML member
heard at PMA that there are both a 16/2.8 and a 16-35/2.8 coming. They bo
These graphic artists sneak in here and pretend photography is hard for them
. Nice work.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 2:44 PM
Subject: "My" Photography Show
> We
Take a look at your negatives. Are they really dark?
Did the lab pull these images our of bad negatives?
It sounds like your metering is way off.
Look at the batteries and the contacts in the battery chamber.
New batteries are cheaper than another roll of film.
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECT
How much room do you need, I can give you space on my server for free just
let me know how much room you need and how big the files are (tiff or jpg).
al
-Original Message-
From: Anand DHUPKAR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 6:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: O
After the yet to be finished adventure of my brand new FA31 (being checked
with Pentax now), I discovered something interesting about my FA77
yesterday. I have purchased an used metal Takumar 100mm hood and see if it
works on my FA77 which has a rather shallow hood. It seemed to work fine,
but
In a message dated 6/15/2003 3:16:30 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Nice job, Marnie!
>
> keith whaley
>
> Some P.S. thoughts:
> Not too many wide open spaces in Contra Costa County anymore, are there?
> I loved that barn shot!
> I lived in Concord, way back in '58-'63, a
The only 2 parts that could cause the drag is F101 & F131 as far as I can
imagine. But I could be wrong.
regards,
Alan Chan
After the yet to be finished adventure of my brand new FA31 (being checked
with Pentax now), I discovered something interesting about my FA77
yesterday. I have purchased a
In a message dated 6/15/2003 3:40:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> These graphic artists sneak in here and pretend photography
> is hard for them
> . Nice work.
>
> Ciao,
> Graywolf
Hehehehe. I never was a graphic artist actually, just a painter once. For a while,
long
On 03.6.15 4:53 PM, "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The
> strange thing is, the focus ring feels light again if the camera was shifted
> to portrait format (on camera or not really doesn't matter).
I too have been aware of it since I purchased it when it came out. In fact,
it was first
I have, and I grasp it very well thank you. May you gain wisdom with time
as well my son.
At 09:29 PM 6/15/03 +0200, you wrote:
To grasp the true meaning of socialism - try a little reading!
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 15. juni 2003 21:23
Til
Perhaps Pentax made the helical portion too narrow (F101) because the design
is basically the same as M lenses.
regards,
Alan Chan
I too have been aware of it since I purchased it when it came out. In
fact,
it was first pointed out by someone in this list at that time.
It is hard to tell what
I doubt that it is as simple as all that. Roanoke is still a small town.
You're dealing
with a local paper, not the New York Post or Daily News, it is most likely
they toned down
their report rather than playing up the more sensational aspects of the
case to spare the
local populaces's sensibil
1. Yesterday I've loaded a TMax 100 film to my ZX-L. ME Super is going
to be cleaned and probably mirror foam going to be replaced. ZX-L
rated the TMax 100 as 160 ISO film. How come?
Try to clean the DX contacts on the camera and the film cartridge and see if
it solves the problem.
2. I've got 49
will give repeatable aperture sizes to very close tolerances.
If calibrated properly. :-)
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
Looks like a bright future for the FAJ-lenses, then... :-)
Yep, the future FAJ, not the current FAJ.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Hi,
Sunday, June 15, 2003, 10:04:03 PM, you wrote:
> And photography *IS* hard. ;-)
you've done well in that set to show some variety within a coherent
theme. This is something that the Royal Photographic Society (RPS)
stresses when people submit work for their distinction awards. But
having sat
Were the Kodak Photo CDs you used to get back when requested recorded
with a proprietary format, but they're offering jpegs now? Don't know,
but I'll bet someone here has the info...
There are 2 CDs from Kodak. PhotoCD is the high quality 4000dpi scans while
PictureCD is low quality format.
regar
Shell's wife had enough of the whole thing:
http://www.roanoke.com/roatimes/news/story150953.html
BR
> I am planning replace my existing tripd with corbon
> fibre tripod, so was thinking about the ball heads.
> I have few doubts about them.
As indeed I did when I was in your position. Having since purchased a
Manfrotto 486RC2 ball head some months ago, I can truly say that it has
proven faultles
Hi There,
No one has mentioned the Tamron 90mm AF f2.8 1x macro.
I've got one and it's superb!!
Sincerely,
Ryan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
but if Pentax knew this was the direction they were going in why not
include on-body aperture control?
Judging from the Pentax K mount history, I have a strong feeling that they
have never had a strong vision, let alone direction. We all know they have
had many never-seen-the-light products, as
Oh, I very much doubt that. You'd be surprised at what goes on regularly in
small towns, and what the cops find on a regular basis. A LARGE portion of
the weirdness in this country is in its small towns, and if I were to
describe to you some of the stuff that has gone on in our little town of
2,500
I live in a small town too, and I understand the weirdness that can lie
below the surface.
I was only commenting on small town newspapers, (who in my experience gloss
over such
things), and politics, (I believe that district attorneys are elected in
Virginia which
makes a very political office e
As someone who grew up in Roanoke and still visits quite often...
It's not what you would normally picture as a small town. The city of
Roanoke has a population of ~90,000 and the metropolitan area brings it well
over 100,000. Since Radford University and Virginia Tech are the largest
universiti
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Well, not "mine." I finally finished the advanced
> photography class I was taking and it ended in a little
> show. Actually, when everything was hung (eight students
> remaining) it looked d__n good and not
Shit, you guys think 90,000 is a small town. I live in a town of 2,500
and think it's big enough (admittedly Melbourne is only 60 kilometres
away and has 3~4 million). The best part about my town is that nothing
ever happens, and I mean nothing
Cheers
Shaun Canning
Cultural Heritage Services
Well, more properly the town I live in used to be a small town, about 20
years ago we had a year round population of about 3000, now it's about 20,000.
It's still got a small town mentality.
At 09:30 AM 6/16/03 +1000, you wrote:
Shit, you guys think 90,000 is a small town. I live in a town of 2,500
Marnie,
I really like the barn. I drive from Sacramento to SF fairly often
and have thought over and over that I would like to capture those
beautiful hills. Getting the right composition is the real trick. I
am always in a rush and can never take the time to do it. Your barn
shot is quite in
This reminds me of a story I heard recently. It goes like this:
A girl goes to the police station and reports that she was raped. The desk
sergeant asks when it happened. She says, "Two weeks ago". The desk
sergeant asks, "When did you realize that you had been violated? She says,
"When th
My Dad always said Roanoke was "too big to be a small town and too small to
be a big town.
Bill
> Well, more properly the town I live in used to be a small town, about 20
> years ago we had a year round population of about 3000, now it's about
20,000.
> It's still got a small town mentality.
>
>
And to think people have been comparing me to Bob
shell, K
__
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
> Well, not "mine." I finally finished the
advanced
photography class I was taking and it
ended in a little show. Actually, when everything was hung (eight students remaining)
it
looked d__n good and not that little. This is my part of the show. Depending
I agree with you, Bruce,
The barn is my fave, too.
Well done, Marnie! All were wonderful shots. So now that it's all over, what do you
think of your instructer?
cheers,
frank
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Marnie,
>
> I really like the barn. I drive from Sacramento to SF fairly often
> and have tho
Well, Leonard,
You've hit the nail on the head. He's innocent until proven guilty. And the
State has to prove it's case against him "beyond a reasonable doubt" (not beyond
a shadow of a doubt - commone mistake ). Hard to know what the guy did or
didn't do, or what the girl did or didn't agree t
Biting my tongue, biting my tongue, biting my tongue...
-frank
Brendan wrote:
> And to think people have been comparing me to Bob
> shell, K
>
> __
> Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
--
"What a senseless
Fank be nice :D
--- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: > Biting my tongue, biting my tongue, biting my
> tongue...
>
>
>
> -frank
>
> Brendan wrote:
>
> > And to think people have been comparing me to Bob
> > shell, K
> >
> >
>
___
Naah, listen to good old Caveman: you have to get married first. This is
the only true way to get a divorce. (And that's why wimin are so
insistent about it.)
Then get a studio and do nudes. Lots of them, including fetish, bondage
and the whole dark side. Get published. From this moment wife wi
So that's why you work in an underground bunker, completely impervious to
nuclear (or as GW would say, nuk-u-lar) attack? So your signifcant other
won't know what evil lurks in your mind?
cheers,
frank
Caveman wrote:
> Naah, listen to good old Caveman: you have to get married first. This is
>
The circumstances of her death will weigh heavily against him. Remember
there is
a death involved here. There is no question of the girl agreeing or not, she's
dead that is not an option of consent, not in any jurisdiction I'm aware of.
At 08:40 PM 6/15/03 -0400, you wrote:
Well, Leonard,
You'
frank theriault wrote:
Hard to know what the guy did or
didn't do, or what the girl did or didn't agree to,
Strange: a tape recorded with a porn movie constitues evidence
("pornography found on premises"), while one with a record of what
actually happened in the room can't be used as evidence in
And as a serious comment. Canon does a lot of business because they always
have the right product at the right time, with the right technology and
performance, not because they changed camera mounts.
Really? So Canon EOS has nothing to do with the lens mount?
The technology and performance would
That was clearly an improper instruction, and if appealed, would likely have
resulted in a new trial. The fact that the Crown didn't appeal just says
that they didn't give a s**t either...
-frank
William Robb wrote:
> We had a case here a few years back where a couple of rich white kids
> whack
In a message dated 6/15/2003 3:22:11 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Very nice Marnie,I too like the barn shot.Good composition and lighting.
> On a side note,your montage shots are exactly what i'm looking for a program to do
> automatically.I can do them somewhat in PS bu
frank theriault wrote:
I didn't mix sex into it at all, the police did. AFAIK, he hasn't been charged with
murder yet, only with "sodomy" (which shouldn't be a criminal charge, imho), and with
"sexual penetration with an object" (which shouldn't be a criminal charge, either).
Huh. So using a suppo
Who the hell am I kidding? Any reference to my sex life must be presented in the past
tense.
-frank
I rather optimistically wrote:
> No one here knows anything about my
> sexual preferences (and it's gonna stay that way!)
--
"What a senseless waste of human life"
-The Customer in Monty Pytho
I wouldn't say this can't happen here but it shouldn't.
At 08:03 PM 6/15/03 -0600, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Peter Alling
Subject: Re: Did you hear the one about Bob Shell?
> The circumstances of her death will weigh heavily against him.
Remember
> there is
> a death involved
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
