Hi Bruce
I agree, a very beautiful picture.
Maybe I would have tried to capture everything of the green leaves at the
right top and bottom,
but otherwise the picture and the colors are very nice.
Markus
Love the creamy bokeh, lovely detail (well focused, and I don't know how
much sharper you'd
Hi Jens
a quick glance at your website showed me, that you experimented with a Right
Angle Scope.
I also got one from a flee market for nearly nothing but have not used it
yet. It seems
to be very hard to focus with it, because it moves with the lens, I think
you understand what I mean.
Did you
Hi Dave
the picture is too minimalistic for my personal taste and I would like to
see more details of the plants.
I like the idea behind.
happy Sunday
Markus
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/bullrush.jpg
I like that photo for it's strangeness and the composition too.
I could imagine it would not have the same effect in color.
How does the original look, do you have a link for it too?
thanks
Markus
The B/W photo at the top of this page -
http://home.earthlink.net/~allaround6/token.htm - was
Hi
John
thanks for that overview.
Have you ever dropped such a micro drive without damaging and would you say
that they are reliable?
just wondering
happy Sunday
Markus
--
I've got a couple of 1GB Hitachi MicroDrives I use in my *ist-D.
Sure, they draw more power than a compact flash card. But
John Francis wrote:
I often used to wonder if I should have bought an LX, but in
all honesty the MX probably served me just as well, and I
doubt if I'd have got almost three decades of service out of
an LX with only two visits to the repair shop.
One of my MXs will be going for the first
Hi,
Saturday, April 24, 2004, 10:57:34 PM, Rob wrote:
Salt and pepper on that hat sir?
...and a bit of mayo...
Just waiting to see Button put in a decent time around Imola...
see you in about 3 years then.
--
Cheers,
Bob
1. Pentax SMC-FA 28-80/3,5-4,7 (Amazingly good, concidering the pricetag,
weight and powerzoom. It just isn't pro-quality).
2. Pentax SMC-F 70-210/4-5,6 (A poor lens compared to the earlier F version)
I bought them with my PZ-1 in 1992 and sold both of them 4 or 5 years ago. I
replaced them with:
Just wanted to say thanks for all the comments on this PAW. It was
one where I wasn't quite sure how I felt about it. Seems that it was
reasonably well liked by most. That is what I like about the PAW, it
helps validate ideas and directions as we attempt to learn.
Bruce
Sunday, April 25,
Hi Markus
You are rigt about the focusing. You need a manual or an internal focusing
lens.
I use it mostly on a 135mm MF lens. And I can use it on my SONY F717 (58mm
filter thread) as well. Oh, you can get nice shots! The quality and state of
the mirror are setting limits, of cource - it has to be
Your welcome Bruce and I start wondering, which pictures you felt right
about :-)
Markus
Just wanted to say thanks for all the comments on this PAW. It was
one where I wasn't quite sure how I felt about it.
Hi Jens
do you happen to have used the Tokina AF 28-70mm SD 3.5-4.5 too and can
comment on it.
I got it with a used SFX wonder, whether I should start using it instead of
the Pentax
SMC F 35-125 3.5-4.5.
I did not quiet understand which F 70-210mm zoom you liked/disliked, was
there a typo
in your
På 25. apr. 2004 kl. 01.19 skrev Mark Roberts:
OK, here's a new question:
What camera or lens have you bought that you regretted purchasing?
I'll go first because my answer will startle you at first:
Pentax A20/2.8
(Now the other shoe drops). because now that I have an ist-D I wish
I'd
Well, I don't understand 1/2 of what you guys have been talking about, but it
sure makes me paranoid about archiving photos.
Marnie aka Doe
To me that line is nonexistent.
Photos have been altered in the dark room from the beginning. Also,
any decision you make before or during the exposure is a manipulation,
as I have illustrated in this folder of unmanipulated photos:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder.tcl?folder_id=366144
So
Quite right.
John
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:54:58 +0100, Nick Clark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a correction - It was the GLC. The GLA is the current reincarnation
also led by Ken Livingstone, but with far less power.
BTW - I agree with your opinion.
Nick.
-Original Message-
So it seems. Just my dirty mind.
John
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:20:28 -0400, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds much more interesting in English than it is...
Anders Hultman wrote:
John Forbes:
What does strumpbyxor? Sounds interesting.
Stretch tights; panty hose.
She
Yes, I had this Tokina zoom once - I sold it with an ME-Super. I's not bad,
but kind of average I believe. It got very nice review when it was
introduced long ago, though. I guess it doesn't quite compare to the PRO II,
though.
About the Pentax 70-210mm. The FA (Power Zoom - made for PZ-1) is not
my case doesn't have as nice a setup. still, i think only one of my drive
failures was because of overheating.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: Harddisk MTBF IDE versus SCSI
the new ones still draw a lot of power, about twice as much as a solid state
CF card during normal use. peak writing current is considerably higher and
sends the camera power management scheme into low power warning on a fresh
set of batteries and a burst of shots. if you leave the camera on and
You might do some tests:
Shoot the same scene at different apertures using a sturdy tripod. Use slide
film to be able to compare the shots in, let's say, 1.8m 1.2m (50 times
enlargement) or even 100 times. Pick scenery with lots of detail. You can
cut the slides in halves and mount two comparable
Dag T wrote:
Well, I bought mine two ears ago, and yes, I now want the AF
version :-)
Well, they say expensive things cost an 'arm and a leg', so why can't time
be measured in 'ears'.
Dag, thanks for raising a smile here on an otherwise boring day.
Malcolm
It is a great lens. Here´s some examples:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=83826
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=72128
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=71919
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=71209
I've had good luck converting color neg, even high speed, to bw.
The color mixer tool in Photoshop is a good place to start when
performing the conversion; there are plugs and actions available
to assist as well.
The problem you might have will be _printing_ them. Most inkjet
type printers can't
Thanks for your comment, Markus.
I was trying more for the silloette of the bullrushes,but i dont think i achieved that
very well.
Dave
Hi Dave
the picture is too minimalistic for my personal taste and I would like to
see more details of the plants.
I
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/topdml_1.jpg
Here is a quick collage of some i took yesterday.
Top row: Landing duck, Nesting Goose (shes in the crook of a willow tree with her
nest)
Middle row: Jeff shooting geese, Frank shooting the abansoned building # 3
Botton row: Jeff and Frank
Hi Jens
I wanted to see the full street cafe picture on your website but when I
click on the thumbnail, nothings but an empty page with the navigation bars
shows up. Slideshow does not work too here.
I also tried the link you provided before in emails. Do you use any
scripting language that my
That's right, Markus. Thanks for letting me know.
I think there's a problem with www.fotopic.net at the moment.
The link for my concert shots - Den Hvide Alf (The White Elf) is however
working fine: http://gallery59991.fotopic.net/c162875.html
I will check my PAW-gallery and keep you posted.
DagT
Very nice wide angle shots. I'm glad you like this lens (one of my
favorites) - I realize now, that I should use mine more often. Mine has a
tendensy to overexpose - only on some cameras (Z1) for some odd reason.
All the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Boris, Boris, Boris,
As I said in response to Bill Owens last week or so, when he said, something
to the effect, I like a critique that tells me what I did wrong, don't
take my words as gospel. Or anything else of authority.
Especially in the situation of your photo. I was telling you what I
Peter,
If some Eastern Potentate, Bill Gates or the Pope lived in that house, I
might be okay with it.
But it's probably just some day trader, who's fortune could be wiped out by
a burp in the stock market...
vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
Shel,
That's the cool thing about art (I seem to be on that this weekend - don't
know why, maybe doing 10 or 15 PAW commentaries yesterday morning has me
considering these sorts of things). I love it when people see things in my
photos that I didn't. I don't mean actual physical details, but
Thanks to the advice from a Pentax users in this group I have today created
an account with www.photo.net
and placed 2 old and one recent photo at the following link:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2313816
This is just a test, I will soon place recent photos there. But Furball
really
In a message dated 4/24/2004 10:47:57 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps you remember this gang from an earlier pic. Here
they are again, hanging out on the sidewalk in San
Francisco's Mission District one summer afternoon. Comments
and crits are always welcome.
As you know, Shel,
I just love this whole series - I still think/hope you can somehow get it
published; it's such a wonderful chronical of those times.
In this case, you show us how to use an ultra-wide on the street! The kid
in the foreground dominates the frame, even though we know he's
Interesting that the two in the back are wearing coats, but the two in front
are in t-shirts.
If the weather is cool enough for coats, I bet the ice cream cone won't melt
for a while!
vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true.
Hi Shel
it is the first photo I see from you and I like it, because it seems to be
real kids life to me.
The gang seems proud and cool and enjoying the photo session but trying to
hide their thoughts somewhat.
Critics:
Nothing missing if it is a single snapshot
I would like to see alternatives
I´m planning to do a couple of days motorcycling in Denmark so I have to
unsubscribe for the duration. I hope to see my e-mails, though.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http:\\www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL
Hi Markus ...
So pleased that you liked the PAW this week. The kids were
great ... there are more to be posted at another time. Stay
tuned LOL
You asked to see another one, here it is ... ;-)))
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/images/trike.html
shel
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Shel
Hi Frank ...
I believe it was Mark Twain who was reported to have said,
The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in San
Francisco. Those are not ice cream cones, rather, some
sort of candy bar, like a taffy, iirc.
shel
frank theriault wrote:
Interesting that the two in the back are
Hi Frank ...
You always see more in my photos than I do ;-)) Thanks for
your keen observations and kind comments.
I'm sure you remember this one
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/images/trike.html
Somewhat different perspective with the 20mm lens, which I
used quite a bit when
LOL Those are not ice cream cones. They are a candy bar
of some sort, perhaps taffy, IIRC.
I spent a fair amount of time with these kids, and I'm sure
there's a photo of them by the store in which they bought
their delicious treats. Might be a closer shot of them
enjoying the candy, as well.
I guess it must the temperate due to its proximaty with the ocean.
Nova Scotia's like that. Cool summers. When the temp gets around 70F the
locals are telling me how hot it is, while I'm wondering when summer's going
to come.
They call it The Air Conditioned Province.
-frank
The optimist
- Original Message -
From: David Miers
Subject: RE: D76
I'm certainly not an expert in this field and offer this link only
for your
examination. Draw your own conclusions.
I have.
The old fashioned way.
Running sensitometric tests of T-Max 100 and 400 film in both
developers.
I
I sure do remember that one (which I liked a lot, but I like the new one
better - there's more of a dynamic happening, not as static).
I can see now that they're eating some sort of taffee. Marnie threw me off
by mentioning ice cream cones. g
Amazing how other people see things in one's work
I gotta proof read before I hit send! vbg
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess it must the temperate due to its proximaty with the ocean.
snip
Hi Steve
I am not certain about or whether it is a race, could be Norwegische
Waldkatze = Norwegian forest cat.
They wanted to kill him 3 years ago, because he was fighting with all the
other cats, I got him from the
doctor and do not know more about his history.
Yes, Leo Leu Lowenzahn is a bit
Hi William
is there a way to reset the camera to it's defaults - you would loose
personal settings?
just guessing, that's what I have to do with computer equipment sometimes
:-)
Markus
I was out shooting this morning and on my last picture, the *ist D
told me that the Battery Depleted, so I
Some very nice pics, there ;-))
Do you have a large one of this:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=71209
which I REALLY like quite a bit. It seems to have just the
elements I'm looking for in order to make a comparison to
my 20mm and 18mm
Thanks!
Dag T wrote:
It is a
Markus,
Unfortunatly there is no way to reset the defaults in the current
condition. The camera will only blink the empty battery symbol at me.
None of the buttons, or dials work :-(
Thanks though,
Bill
On Sunday, April 25, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi William
is there a
Hi William,
on 25 Apr 04 you wrote in pentax.list:
Anyone know if this is a glitch that can be fixed easily, or am I
going to have to send my *ist D in for service?
Try using the batteries either in the camera or the grip only, not in
both battery compartments.
Cheers, Heiko
LOL!
Norm
William Robb wrote:
Very few photos are worth archiving anyway. It is human arrogance
that makes people think that their photos are worth the effort.
David,
THANK YOU!! I went ahead and recharged my rechargeables, and
moved all of the alkalines off into a pile. The rechargables just
finished recharging and I tossed them right into the grip . . . low and
behold, the camera is now fine. That gave me quite a start. I guess
the
This one is nice Markus, I like the lighting, composition and subject.
Nice mood.
Norm
Markus Maurer wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2314030
Usually grave stones lead to sadness but the light late in the afternoon
and the animal with the nut (don't know it's name in
Actually, I'm quite impressed with the reliability of the *ist D. I've
shot more than 3000 frames without a problem. I think there were some
initial build defects (I sent my first camera back), but I haven't
heard many reports of genuine in-use failures. Most reported failures
have proved to
I should add that I like simple, old cameras as well. But I do love
what digital has done for my workflow.
Paul
On Apr 25, 2004, at 10:53 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I can't help you at all, but it amazes me what you digital
users have to put up with some times. Aaack!! is right.
Almost every day
How large do you want it :-)
I´ve got a 60MB 16bit TIFF-file with 3816x2604 pixels scanned with a
Minolta Elite II scanner, but I have to send it by mail...
DagT
På 25. apr. 2004 kl. 17.30 skrev Shel Belinkoff:
Some very nice pics, there ;-))
Do you have a large one of this:
On 25/4/04, BOB W, [severely] discombobulated, offered:
one of the pleasures of the PDML is the scarcely believable variety of
people it attracts. How else would it be possible for somebody like me
to meet in one evening:
1. someone who lives on a volcano
2. someone who turned down an offer of
On 24/4/04, BOB, [fatally] discombobulated, offered:
Just about to head off up to town to meet up with Bob, Gianco, Steve J
and John F.
Just waiting to see Button put in a decent time around Imola...
see you in about 3 years then.
Cheeky [expletive deleted].
POLE!
2nd in the race!
Oh ye
Last night I got together with some friends and their telescopes.
I brought along my *ist D.
This was shot with a 1540mm f11 telescope (Orion Starmax or something)
and the *ist D in prime focus (telescope acting as the primary lens).
ISO 200, 1/10.
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: where is the crossing line ?
I wonder why or if it's difficult to make a viewfinder with a 100%
view
The high end Nikon F cameras were 100% viewfinders. I recall when I
bought my F2s, that the word was that the 100% viewfinder added
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Pentax A20/2.8 Query
Ohhh ... that sounds nice. I like that 100 macro feel, also
the way the A135/1.8 felt. Some of the A lenses have a very
unsatisfactory feel.
67mm filters, right?
67mm filters.
William Robb
Are the other two chaps really tall too, or did Cotty have on his short
shoes?
keith
John Forbes wrote:
I've recorded this aspicious event here:
http://www.johnforbes.homechoice.co.uk/john/pdml.htm
John
I just ran across the PENTAX User magazine online, published quarterly in
the UK. Any opinions from the group as to it's usefulness? Is it worth the
subscription price of almost $30 US for four issues?
Tom C.
_
FREE pop-up
Sunday evening Survey :-)
what photographic publications do you read often and which books about
photography
are a must to read and look at and why?
- I bought a used set of 12 Time life books about photography themes and the
history of photography over an internet auction lately and enjoyed
Those aren't his real legs. He's actually standing in the river.
John
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:38:24 -0700, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are the other two chaps really tall too, or did Cotty have on his short
shoes?
keith
John Forbes wrote:
I've recorded this aspicious event here:
Ahh... I believe you but I don't understand... I would think alignment and
precision were an integral part of any camera design.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: where is the crossing line ?
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004
In a message dated 4/25/2004 7:19:39 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LOL Those are not ice cream cones. They are a candy bar
of some sort, perhaps taffy, IIRC.
I spent a fair amount of time with these kids, and I'm sure
there's a photo of them by the store in which they
Cool shot Alex!
It's always been my aspirations to get into astrophotography, especially
deep space objects.
Tom C.
From: alex wetmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW: moon
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
Last night I got
Right.
So, here's some that Jeff took. At least you can see my face in one (it's a
horrible photo, though - I really don't look like that much):
http://img30.photobucket.com/albums/v90/jefkom/Stouffville/
BTW, those horses are at the stable where Dave keeps the family nag (just
joking, she's
Have you checked the electrical contacts - they may be dirty, oxidised or
otherwise damaged?
And - Yes digital users have to put up with a lot (RAMcards, cardreaders,
computers, batteries, printers, cartridges etc.). Just not film developers,
tanks, water and chemical containers, enlargers etc.
In a message dated 4/23/2004 5:08:52 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From dpreview, a full summary someone has posted:
I've collected the important specifications info included it in the
list,
together with the prices via http://www.NexTag.com as of today:
Portable Hard
That's another pretty cool IR piccie.
You'll make a believer outta me yet, Larry!
BTW, what lens did you use? Looks wide-ish.
Oh yeah, the comp is just lovely. Pretty hard to make ponds look
interesting ('cause one's seen so many that after a while, a pond's a pond's
a pond, if ya know what
Marnie,
I wear shorts and sandals almost year round, here in S. Calif.
That includes Winter, if it's not too bitter.
When we're going out somewhere, my wife has to tell me, You have to put
on shoes, you know! Then I know what to expect. g
keith whaley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message
I've been getting it for a while. Must be a full year now, maybe more...
I'd say that if your interest emcompasses all things Pentax, and you are
fond of the older Pentaxes as well as the newest ones, if you like some
technical articles on equipment, techniques and reviews, you'll find all
of
I like this a lot, Marnie.
The colours are so harmonious! And, very spring-like (which we need here
today - after a nice, if coolish day yesterday, it's currently +3C, raining
very hard, and very windy - yuck!).
I really like the composition, the way all the blooms are pointing in the
same
Markus Maurer wrote:
what photographic publications do you read often and which
books about photography are a must to read and look at and why?
I subscribe to Amateur Photographer and Pentax User Magazine. My
photographic books are more 'how to do' than examples of a particular
professional's
Hm, Hm and hmmm...
The second one: well, the first time I looked at it, I immediately said, I
like the first one better!
But, now the second one's growing on me. Definitely more impressionistic.
Maybe that's why I'm coming to like it: it's different, but it works. It
would be
Tom C wrote:
I just ran across the PENTAX User magazine online, published
quarterly in the UK. Any opinions from the group as to it's
usefulness? Is it worth the subscription price of almost $30
US for four issues?
I subscribe to this, mainly for the discount in servicing and some of
I have a subscription to Outdoor Photographer (which I got in a bundle of
magazine subscriptions, I mean I picked it out to make up four subscriptions).
It's not bad, some interesting articles. But the main thing is, naturally, they
are selling camera equipment -- i.e. the ads and articles.
In a message dated 4/25/2004 11:31:42 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You got in there nice and close, and it's sharp enough, too.
Yup. A lovely shot.
thanks,
frank
---
Thanks, frank.
Marnie vbg
In a message dated 4/25/2004 11:36:38 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But, now the second one's growing on me. Definitely more impressionistic.
Maybe that's why I'm coming to like it: it's different, but it works. It
would be nice if ~one~ of the blooms were in sharper
Link 2 don't work neither.
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: William M Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Flowers
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004
In a message dated 4/25/2004 11:33:37 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie,
I wear shorts and sandals almost year round, here in S. Calif.
That includes Winter, if it's not too bitter.
When we're going out somewhere, my wife has to tell me, You have to put
on shoes, you
Don't crash.
Don't break anything (which shouldn't be a problem if you observe suggestion
#1, above).
Have fun!
vbg
cheers,
frank
ps: if you go to Copenhagen, don't hit any bike couriers, as my friend
Kasper works there.
-f
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
Yeah, it's a tough life, eh, Marnie?
vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
OTOH, I want to try out my fisheye lens too. So much to try, so much to
shoot, and so little
William Robb wrote:
Very few photos are worth archiving anyway. It is human arrogance
that makes people think that their photos are worth the effort.
-
I'd call it more wishful thinking.
Marnie In my case, anyway.
I looked at the pix this morning, and only just read the text now.
Great job, John. Not on the photos. With that motley crew (no, not the
rock band), you did what you could, but one can only do so much with modern
imaging software. vbg
No, I meant the text was most enjoyable and
Hi
John
thanks for that overview.
Have you ever dropped such a micro drive without damaging and would you say
that they are reliable?
just wondering
happy Sunday
Markus
I've never dropped one. I try very hard not to drop *any* photographic
equipment - lenses like being dropped even
Even though the cat's body fades into OOF, it seems that you've named your
cat very appropriately. vbg
Very nice photos. I find that my cats co-operate when I drug them. A bit
of catnip, they get all frisky, then go into that stupor. If cats could
smile, they'd be doing so.
Cosmic Kitty
67mm filters, right?
67mm filters.
Yes, mounted to threads on a flared-out flange at the front of the
lens, so that a filter cannot vignette on the front of what is,
after all, a very wide angle lens.
I love my A 20/2.8, easily my most-used wide angle lens.
Fred
My point such as it was, was that you don't need western materialist
values to want more than you need. Additionally I have less trouble with a
day trader owning it. He/She might enjoy it more while it lasts.
frank theriault wrote:
Peter,
If some Eastern Potentate, Bill Gates or the Pope
Exceptionally cool!
Norm
alex wetmore wrote:
Last night I got together with some friends and their telescopes.
I brought along my *ist D.
This was shot with a 1540mm f11 telescope (Orion Starmax or something)
and the *ist D in prime focus (telescope acting as the primary lens).
ISO 200, 1/10.
On 24/4/04, MALCOLM, discombobulated, offered:
How far is photographic manipulation acceptable and true to the image taken?
Quite honestly, if you need to go to lengths in Photoshop or whatever,
you've taken the wrong picture.
Re-entering this one late, so apologies if you've already been
On 25/4/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, offered:
I am not certain about or whether it is a race, could be Norwegische
Waldkatze = Norwegian forest cat.
Holy cow! That's Jostein!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Not as sharp as I would have hoped. indeed. This appears to be a very
sharp photo.
alex wetmore wrote:
Last night I got together with some friends and their telescopes.
I brought along my *ist D.
This was shot with a 1540mm f11 telescope (Orion Starmax or something)
and the *ist D in prime
http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/Chicken.jpg
From the wildlife preserve north of the Kennedy Space Center, Florida.
This guy swam out of the marsh and cautiously crossed the road.
Taken with the LX and 77mm limited thru the car windshield,
as I didn't know how hungry he was.
I was on business in
Don't tell me you've been reading this!
http://www.ambrosiasw.com/Ambrosia_Times/September_95/2.5HowTo.html
Cotty wrote:
On 25/4/04, BOB W, [severely] discombobulated, offered:
one of the pleasures of the PDML is the scarcely believable variety of
people it attracts. How else would it be
I hope to try that too. I don't think that the *ist D is the right
camera for it though (longer exposures will have more noise). A lot
of the coolest deep space astrophotography is being done with
dedicated cameras that can have proper cooling for the CCD. Many of
these are actually hacked from
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Peter J. Alling wrote:
Not as sharp as I would have hoped. indeed. This appears to be a very
sharp photo.
You can see a full resolution version at
http://www.phred.org/~alex/pictures/moon/moon-bluesky-large.jpg
It appears to me that the telescope was slightly out of
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
