Hi,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 5:08:59 AM, Andre wrote:
Goodbye dear PDMLers. I will be back in august. I'll be busy taping
music and sounds in Mongolia for an independant movie but will for
sure find time to photograph the surroundings and their people. And
once back, show my paws.
I'm
Since I don't have this lens, I cannot give precise procedure. For fixed
focal length lens, the focus setting screws (usually 3) can be accessed from
the front (might need to remove some barrels first), or underneath the
rubber depends on the design. It has nothing to do with the lens mount.
This is very intersting Herb. Thanks for sharing this info!
All the best
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 30. juni 2004 01:49
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: The public and
I checked their optical diagrams and they look identical. Interestingly, the
AF Nikkor 105/2.8 macro also has the same optical diagram as the Pentax
F/FA100/2.8 macro.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
That 14/2.8 Nikkor is actually a rebadged Tamron.
Hmmm. Based on the specs it COULD
Well I've taken the front group out and there is 3
screws in there, but I thought it just held the front
barrel to the rear section, there is also 3 around the
body of the focus section when you remove the rubber
brip part.
Why would there be three? Would I just loosen them
all and adjust and
If you are certain you can fix it yourself, you might just strip it down and
order the parts from Pentax Canada. It will be much cheaper this way. Or
search for a broken Z-1p for parts.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I have a Z1-p and its great except the flash doesn't
work and it
Thanks Kostas
John
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:11:19 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: Sigma 16mm f/2.8 fisheye c1980's
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, John Whittingham wrote:
Yeah I've striped it down and throughly cleaned the
corroded board, it didn't help though. The board that
I think it might be would be 50 Canadian plus taxes
and shipping and take up to 6 weeks to come in from
Japan, and for all I know it might not even work.
So thats why I'm asking you guys
There's only one real Alice Springs :-)
Cheers
Shaun
Markus Maurer wrote:
Source: Tages Anzeiger Zurich
The Helmut Newton Foundation (Helmut Newton and June Newton a.k.a Alice
Springs)
opened the museum for photography in Berlin near Bahnhof Zoo.
It is located in the house of former
If you are not a repair guy - sell it for parts and get annother used one in
good working order. You might get one for 100-125 USD.
It's really a brilliant camera. My P-Z1 have worked fine since September
1992 (two repairs only, self-inflicted - because of dropping it and by
damaging the shutter
That's a pretty big place! All over Mongolia?
Do take care, and we look forward to your safe retutn...
keith whaley
Andre Langevin wrote:
Goodbye dear PDMLers. I will be back in august. I'll be busy taping
music and sounds in Mongolia for an independant movie but will for sure
find time to
The F is a variable aperture zoom, that means it is _useless_ on both
MX and LX in manual mode. Presto. Take the M - it is a very good zoom.
With the F, you will get _wrong_ exposure during zooming unless in
auto mode.
Fra
AL M is easier to use with manual focus because it has only one ring and
AL a good grip, but if F is substancially better optically, I'll go for
I do not think that the F is substantially better. I once tried out
the 80-200 (or which it was - there were several from K to M) and it
was pretty
Tuesday, June 29, 2004, 11:41:58 PM, Fred wrote:
I'm looking for a second hand AF Pentax body. [snip] Would an SFX
or Z70/PZ70 do the trick?
Other than the freight train sound my SF-1 makes when the shutter
is tripped,and the film advances,'m pretty satisfied with that
one.
F ...and the
frank theriault wrote:
Unfortunately, Boris,
The old man and his dog are little specks on my monitor. They really
aren't part of the photo in any meaningful sense, at least not for me.
It's actually a pretty cool shot of the city through the trees. But the
two figures on the grass neither
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 9:06:39 AM, Alan wrote:
AC I checked their optical diagrams and they look identical. Interestingly, the
AC AF Nikkor 105/2.8 macro also has the same optical diagram as the Pentax
AC F/FA100/2.8 macro.
You can't tell from the diagrams. They are very simplified, do not
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
BD My screen resolution is 1400 X 1050 on a 16 LCD. The reason I state
BD that is because when I look at the pic I see One dot, another dot,
BD and the city - I really can't make out the man or his dog other than
BD two small blobs. Maybe a bigger image would help.
Oh!
Wider than 28mm there's the 24/2.8 from (Kiron?) Vivitar
and the 24/2.5 from Tamron. But not much else.
Pentax has a strange history of focal lengths.
15mm
20mm
30mm
40mm
50mm
85mm
120mm
150mm
200mm
and the rest of the odd-ball lengths to fill in the gaps. :)
Collin
This one time, at band camp, Brian Dipert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4800 dpi for $249 USD..
http://eletters.pcmag.com/zd1/cts?d=81-880-4-4-194435-78649-1
==
Brian Dipert
Technical Editor: Mass Storage, Memory, Multimedia, PC Core Logic and
Peripherals, and
Don'r forget the Sigma 24mm/2.8 MF a fine lens IMHO.
John
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:04:05 -0400
Subject: Re: off-brand lenses they didn't make
Wider than 28mm
We mage an offer and asked for an address. Please advise if we have a deal
and where to send payment(SFXn entire kit).
- Original Message -
From: Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 12:30 PM
Subject: FS: Beautiful SF1n kit w/lens choice and
graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only 75% of them actually use their cameras?
89% of all statistics are meaningless.
John Forbes wrote:
Interesting to speculate on how the 54% do digital photography when
only 40% own a digital camera.
John
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:47:05 -0400, Mark
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's overly aggressive anti-spam filtering or something.
Whatever, quite a few friends have complained that it sometimes takes
several tries to get through to me. Maybe time to change to Yahoo.
If you switch to yahoo you'll soon be longing for
I think the picture might be a lot better if the dots were closer
to the trees. If you had moved up, you would have lost the trees
framing the dog and man, or at least pushed them to the frame edges.
Getting closer probably would not have helped.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hello Boris ...
This is a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a $500 used Sigma 14/3.5 because I couldn't scrape together $1300
for a new Nikkor 14/2.8.
That 14/2.8 Nikkor is actually a rebadged Tamron.
Hmmm. Based on the specs it COULD be
Actually,
Herb wrote:
20,000/month is the same target sales figure they had for the *istD.
REPLY:
Not so. The *ist D target was 5000/month.
Pål
Herb wrote:
however, because of the necessity to keep the prestige of the
Pentax brand name (which they feel is necessary for maintaining
opto-component sales to other digital camera companies without the ability
to design high quality lenses), they will do what is necessary to hold their
camera
G'day all
OK - I've put this off long enough. I've been hanging around here for a couple of
months so it's about time I let you have a go at an image or two.
This one was taken a few years ago (when I was a bit keener about getting up
early on foggy winter's mornings). It was taken not far from
Like the K2.8/105mm, if that's an odd ball :-).
Not to mention 31mm, 35mm, 43mm, 77mm, 300mm, 400mm, 500mm, 600mm, 1000mm
1200mm of course.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Collin Brendemuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt:
What's confusing about this comparison is that film was essentially an
SLR or PS choice. With digital, you have this whole class of EVF
cameras like the Nikon 5700 or K-M A2 or the new 8 mp ones that appeal
to serious amateurs. I also have no doubt that any GFM digital photo
contest will have a
DJE said, among many other things:
Wide angles wider than 28mm are rare. 20mm was either too expensive to
build, too hard to design, or too extreme to sell in sufficient volume
because almost nobody but the manufacturers made them. Only Sigma makes
one, and that is recent. ...
A Vivitar
Very intersting, Thibouille.
Nice for people without any old gear.
But I allready own four classic slave flashes (Osram and Phoenix).
I kind of solved my problem using af third party flash
(Pentax AF280T or a Metz 32 Z-2) in the camera hotshoe.
It works exacly like with a film camera - just one
DJE said, among many other things:
Wide angles wider than 28mm are rare. 20mm was either too expensive to
build, too hard to design, or too extreme to sell in sufficient volume
because almost nobody but the manufacturers made them. Only Sigma makes
one, and that is recent. ...
A Vivitar
Ooh! A truly iconic representation of human society being reduced to
the microcosm of circuitry. The looping wires representing the
convoluted path. to the ancient biological interfaces, roughly scribbled
words on plywood like the modern echo of primitive cave drawings. So
moving. . . .
Nice
I seem to remember that at least part of Pentax USA was being renamed
Pentax Imaging. Has anyone else heard this?
A famous internet auction site has listed a developing tank (sometime called
a rewind tank) for cine film from 8mm to 35mm, closing in 2 days. Users of
250 shot magazines might find such an item useful.
In view of the embargo that most PDMLers choose to honour, I won't reveal
the URL openly.
Now your just teasing us all Pål
5 DA lenses, and new FA lenses as well...if only!
Incidentally, when was the last FA lens introduced (other than the
'Limited' range).
Cheers
Shaun
Pål Jensen wrote:
Heres a few old rumors (from around christmas time):
1) Pentax is likely to implement in body
Well, I haven't used variable-aperture zooms on manual cameras very
often -- they are far more useful and there is less inconvenience
with cameras with at least some auto exposure, because the camera
would then at least adjust for the changing aperture value when
zooming. But my point was that
28,135, and 200 were the standard optional lenses for amateurs. The sold by the
millions. Other focal lengths only sold by the thousands. It is simply where the
market was in the 60's and 70's.
Interestingly 85/90 tended to be European focal lengths, and 100/105 tended to
be Japanese. I never
Sorry I'm late to this thread. Work's been crazy and I'm a day or so behind
on the digests.
I concur that I wouldn't go with hot lights. The one thing I haven't seen in
the threads (up to where I've read so far) is what your friend is shooting.
If it's primarily small items like jewelry or
IIRC, Richard Seaman was a PDML'er as recently as the
Duxford airshow in July, 2003:
http://www.macads.co.uk/pdml/
But alas, he's another who has gone over to The Dark Side:
http://www.richard-seaman.com/Photography/index.html
Regards,
Stephen
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That makes sense. I think 135mm is often too long (in door) for candid
portraits. The 105mm is more convenient to use.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 30. juni 2004 16:29
Til: [EMAIL
At one time it was normal to rate the focal length to standards even though the
design came out differently. For instance, the lens on my Graphic is 133mm but
it is labled 135. It maybe that in their special lenses Pentax desided to simply
spec them at their true focal length rather than their
Steve ...
That's their problem, not yours. Regardless of what approach you take,
what subject(s) you present, there will be people who don't get it, don't
like it, don't appreciate it, or who love what you're doing. You must work
from the premise that you can't please everyone all the time,
Now we are actually getting into advertising claims. The tests I have seen show
the Vivitar 19mm as actually being 21mm. In fact, many lenes are only within
(10% or so) to their nominal focal lengths.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DJE said, among many other things:
Wide angles wider than 28mm are
Sorry to hear that!
Stephen Moore wrote:
IIRC, Richard Seaman was a PDML'er as recently as the
Duxford airshow in July, 2003:
http://www.macads.co.uk/pdml/
But alas, he's another who has gone over to The Dark Side:
http://www.richard-seaman.com/Photography/index.html
Beautiful. Cropping issued can always be discussed. I bit off the buttom
perhaps. But it's still very nice as it is.
I'm glad I'm not the only one using (at least owning) a P50. It's brilliant,
apart from the missing option to adjust ASA setting. And extremly pretty
too. I like the Leica-like
I like it. I like the mood, cliche or not. You should have put this in
the PUG cliche month! I don't think the scanner did that bad of a job.
It might have been interesting if you had gone a little wider, 24mm or
even 20mm maybe, and move your perspective closer to the water.
rg
Brian
I have not followed this thread until now. The aircraft in the pictures are
aircrafts from a different planet! Great stuff!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Daniel J. Matyola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 30. juni 2004
Leica, on many of their lenses, notes their exact focal length. Can't say
for sure if it's still being done, or if it's done on all focal lengths,
but if you observe the markings on the lenses, and understand their
meaning, you'll see that, for example, a nominal 50mm lens may actually be
a
William wrote:
The 1Ds is not Pentax's traditional target market. They have never
really competed there, and only had a camera in it for a short time.
Pentax has always been more about very good lenses attached to middle
of the raod performance bodies.
REPLY:
True enough but the market has
Don't miss the Pentax Digital Camera Showcase at
Ulan Bator while you're in the neighborhood!
Bill
Any taxi driver will know where it is, hopefully...
Golly, some of the folk here on the list have interesting jobs.
graywolf
They pay my plane, my food, etc. It's a small independant
Yes, she is shooting many small items. But she also sells clothing,
which she puts on a mannequin. Its the larger items that are going to
require a different lighting setup. I found this non-hot lighting
setup, which you can buy on BH for about $150:
http://tinyurl.com/2urz2
She only has a
Great shot, Brian. Maybe it's trite, maybe not, but, like you, I'm a
sucker for those misty morning, foggy afternoon shots. There's something
warm and encompassing about them. I like walking in fog and mist, the
ambiance created by fog and mist, and almost any good photo that exploits
the fog
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DJE said, among many other things:
Wide angles wider than 28mm are rare. 20mm was either too expensive to
build, too hard to design, or too extreme to sell in sufficient volume
because almost nobody but the manufacturers made them. Only Sigma makes
one, and that is
Hi gang,
I'm still here, but my job (quitting soon), university
and girlfriend leaves few space for pdml.
Just wanted to let you know that my website has moved
to a new domain:
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
There are some new pics.
The design section will be ready soon.
By the way, if
My understanding from the Pentax Rep is that has already happened.
In fact, IIRC, what he said was Pentax USA (photographic stuff), Pentax Medical
(edoscopes,etc), and Pentax Digital(?)(printers, etc.) have been combined into
Pentax Imaging Corporation. So all the Pentax subsideraries in the US
Jens Bladt a écrit :
Like the K2.8/105mm, if that's an odd ball :-).
Not to mention 31mm, 35mm, 43mm, 77mm, 300mm, 400mm, 500mm, 600mm, 1000mm
1200mm of course.
And 17mm (Super Takumar and K 4/17mm fish eye)
Tell that to the judge. What do you want to do? Put all the expert witnesses out
of business? Yer Onner, dis photo shows de difinit's dog bitting de planif.
Grin.
--
Cotty wrote:
On 30/6/04, graywolf, discombobulated, offered:
In the past couple of weeks we have seen several photos which had
Translation: You need to work on it a bit.
--
Steve Jolly wrote:
I tried that with my last PAW - I got two confused replies from people
saying they couldn't work out what the subject was, and not a single
comment on the photo! :-)
S
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, graywolf wrote:
This brings up something
Nice shot Brian. I like the monochrome effect the fog/light give.
Tom C.
From: Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW: The River
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:10:33 -0600 (MDT)
G'day all
OK - I've put this off long enough. I've been hanging
Thanks for sharing... definitely some nice shots there. Rutan's designs do
remind me of Gerry Anderson and the Thunderbirds.
Tom C.
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Space Ship One
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:42:47 -0400
Merci Michel.
Intersting to see a photograph of this ancient one!
Perhaps I have got it all wrong?
I was refering to the camrea - Pentax Spotmatic, which I believe was
announced to have an on-board spot meterering facility - like most modern
SLRs. I believe the prototype Spotmatic at Photokina
We all know that Pentax marketing has their head up their collective a**
when it comes to advertising. Why should their marketing
estimates be any better.
Herb Chong wrote:
20,000/month is the same target sales figure they had for the *istD.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Pål
My dc260 doesn't shoot sparks, but it does have the vertical/horizontal
auto rotation. (And it's nearly 6 years old, ancient for a digital photo
product).
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Norm Baugher
Subject: Re: wouldn't it be nice
My frickin' Kodak Easy Share has
A famous internet auction site has listed a developing tank (sometime called
a rewind tank) for cine film from 8mm to 35mm, closing in 2 days. Users of
250 shot magazines might find such an item useful.
In view of the embargo that most PDMLers choose to honour, I won't reveal
the URL
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, frank theriault wrote:
I hate Hotmail. I guess ya gets what ya pays for, eh?
I can recommend Gmail, Google's new web mail service.
Makes mailing lists very easy to follow, too.
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
I've seen Richard Seaman's site before, but this time was the first I've
actually noticed his section on WarBirds.
I had the privilege of flying in an F7F Tigercat in 1952. One of the few
still flying at the time.
Lovely aircraft! A memory to last a lifetime.
keith whaley
Daniel J. Matyola
Hi,
Malcolm Smith wrote:
And who are they going to sell them too? If you took a random street poll of
the British public (I can't say for the US and elsewhere) my guess the top
three camera names people would give you would be Nikon, Canon and Olympus.
I think that would be more and more likely to
Hey William,
Regarding the use of the Pentax 17/4.0 fisheye, you said not to stop down
any more than necessary. Why is this? Does diffraction set in early? I'm
quite curious!
I do macro work so always focus manually. What matters to me is the
quality
of the optics. I like an extremely deep
No of the SF cameras were quiet... OTOH, they are nice (if bit ugly)
cameras with very good build quality compared to more recent models.
The internal chassis is metal, they have good viewfinder.
But they lack features like aperture display in
I can't claim great expertise on other brands of fish-eye lenses but the
Pentax 17mm f4 is quite small and light
next to most other fish-eyes that I've handled. The results it produces
are more than respectable and you can usually
find them for quite reasonable prices, especially if you're not
Which just proves that you can please some of the people all of the time,
and all of the people some of the time, but you can't please all of the
people all of the time. And some peple you can never please anytime.
If anyone finds the item I referred to, without the direct link, it will be
From: Shel Belinkoff
A lot of people (here and in other venues) produce mediocre pap which is
very appealing to many people. Their work makes few, if any, demands on
the viewer, offers little to think about, teaches nothing, and is appealing
only in its inoffensiveness and neutrality. If
mike wilson wrote:
I think that would be more and more likely to be Canon, Nokia
and Sony.
Not necessarily in that order.
Quite likely. Shame Pentax isn't in the top three.
Malcolm
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
Either don't mention the auction at all (especially if you recognise
any familiar names in the bidding), or if you consider the item falls
into the 'rare unusual' exception category go ahead and post the URL.
Or, if
First rate photography, equal to and often better than the press offerings
and the official Space Ship One site. Richards website is mighty impressive
too.
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's an interesting shot that someone
That would only be true if you were using a hand held meter. The big
problem is with flash, if you
don't have a TTL flash for the LX. It's not useless, it just requires a
bit more care. That said I'd go
with the non variable f-stop and better manual focusing on the M if I
weren't carrying an
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: wouldn't it be nice
My dc260 doesn't shoot sparks, but it does have the
vertical/horizontal
auto rotation. (And it's nearly 6 years old, ancient for a digital
photo
product).
If it doesn't frick, then what good is it?
William
Hi,
I think that would be more and more likely to be Canon, Nokia
and Sony.
Not necessarily in that order.
Quite likely. Shame Pentax isn't in the top three.
Pentax appears several times on the Independent's list of the 50 best
cameras:
It's a comfort to know that Bob classes us all amongst the better sort of
person.
:-)
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pentax appears several times on the Independent's list of the 50 best
cameras:
76% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
Mark Roberts wrote:
graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only 75% of them actually use their cameras?
89% of all statistics are meaningless.
John Forbes wrote:
Interesting to speculate on how the 54% do digital photography when
only 40%
I like it. You seem to have captured the feel of a misty morning very
nicely.
Brian Walters wrote:
G'day all
OK - I've put this off long enough. I've been hanging around here for a couple of
months so it's about time I let you have a go at an image or two.
This one was taken a few years ago
That's a great shot. It's humorous, well composed, offers a point of view,
and has great potential in many venues I can see it as a wonderful Easter
card, a calendar shot, and perhaps even an Anti-TS Elliot comment (April is
the cruelest month ...LOL). The photos I've seen you post are
Hi!
ft Just a guy holding a dog. Not even his dog (Fritz belongs to Helene). If
ft you knew Julian, you'd know this is actually him (hard to explain):
ft http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2471920
As such (just a guy holding a dog) it is a little too out of focus,
Frank. It looses
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Jim Apilado wrote:
Konica and Minolta merged. Could Pentax merge with another company that has
more name recognition, like Nikon? That might improve the stature of both
companies.
Konica's SLR line has been dead for years or decades.
If that happened I expect that
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Don't you find the SpaceShipOne to resemble SciFi movies and book
covers of the Fifties or older?
That spindle shape, all those portholes, not to speak of the blue starlets
here and there...
To me, it looks like a naive design, very different from what I expected
from
Hi!
SB http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/paw/manbus2.html
The positions of drawn and real arms are very fitting. I can almost
feel that it is you who is drawn on the bus in a caricaturistic
(speller does not like word, duh!) kind of way. You know - here is
humorous self-portrait of an
Hi!
KW Reeds in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan
KW http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
KW Comments - likes/dislikes - what would you have done differently
KW Thanks in advance for looking /commenting
Ken, really, what is hiding behind the right most part of the frame.
KW Reeds in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan
KW http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
KW Comments - likes/dislikes - what would you have done differently
Oh, I know, it points to the citation from Frank Zappa g...
Just kidding.
Boris
([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL
Hi gang,
I'm still here, but my job (quitting soon), university
and girlfriend leaves few space for pdml.
Just wanted to let you know that my website has moved
to a new domain:
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
There are some new pics.
The design section will be ready soon.
By the way, if somebody
Today I saw at a 2nd hand shop something I never saw.
A 6x7 600mm lens. Ouch. What a monster. Didn't have my camera to take a
picture of this lens (I know, seems stupid) but I'm still shocked.
Thibouille
Hola Albano, no creo que hemos hablado antes. Me gustan mucho tus fotos
y tu pagina web. Tienes buen ojo y buen gusto. A proposito, el boton de
design no hace nada, o al menos asi era mi experiencia cuando visite
la pagina. Las fotos de la señora mayor y su casa son especialment
buenas. Que
Thanks Boris!
I wish I could try again. The dog is long gone, and the boy is 31. At
the age show in the photo, it was rare to get one to slow down long
enough to get a photo, let alone both. They were sitting down looking
very nice, but when I grabbed the camera, they both gave me the deer
www.dpreview.com states as qouted below, that the AF is rather slow, you
must push down the biult-in flash maunally (AF assist) before takeing the
picture, if yoy don't want ti use flash light, and that the AF assist light
may require more than one attempt before focus lock is achieved.
Is this
This one time, at band camp, Thibs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I saw at a 2nd hand shop something I never saw.
A 6x7 600mm lens. Ouch. What a monster. Didn't have my camera to take a
picture of this lens (I know, seems stupid) but I'm still shocked.
Thibouille
did it have a price
Just out of curiosity, does the *istD have a matte focusing screen? Has
anyone tried to add the ZX-M split screen to it?
t
On 6/30/04 13:52, Jens Bladt wrote:
www.dpreview.com states as qouted below, that the AF is rather slow, you
must push down the biult-in flash maunally (AF assist)
One of the many interesting articles at Luminous Landscape addresses the
practical obstacles when using this combination:
http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/600mm.shtml
t
On 6/30/04 13:27, Thibs wrote:
Today I saw at a 2nd hand shop something I never saw.
A 6x7 600mm lens.
Hi,
Bob W wrote:
Pentax appears several times on the Independent's list of the 50 best
cameras:
http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/photography/story.jsp?story=431522
I like Canon Ixus III or similar. That brand not really important,
then; just make sure it's got one of those groovy alloy bodys
LOL
Reminds me of the 800mm f4.0 for the 6x7 that Bob Sullivan and I saw in
Chicago a couple of years ago. WheeeHoo! What a monster. What's the
aperture on that puppy?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Thibs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 6/30/2004 1:29:25 PM
Subject:
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
