On 2 Sep 2004 at 15:54, Ryan Lee wrote:
Oh I don't know, but that'd be pretty good, eh?
Aren't you just a little glad that they didn't print little kangas and koalas
all over it? Especially in gold :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL
What about Pentax-A, Pentax-F, Takumar-A and Takumar-F lenses? Where do
they fit in?
John Francis wrote:
I find it's best to fit them into the big round hole in the front of the
camera.
A lenses are manual focus, F lenses are auto-focus. The Takumar
branding generally
I should probably mention Steve Irwin's grinning semblance was etched just
above the CF card door- I concealed it with some epoxy and careful
airbrushing.. I wonder if that voids the warranty. Maybe I should have left
it on.. All you need is a Japanese lady to say that's cute, and her Pentax
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Toralf Lund
Subject: Re: The meaning of letters in lens names?
Zenit is an old Soviet brand (for those of you who didn't know.)
I named one of my dogs Zenit.
He, he.
I started wondering if these cameras are actually still being
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Fred Widall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: September PUG comments
Nikki Lea by Dave Madsen. A beautiful portrait of a beautifu woman.
Her green eyes work very well with the green
Ryan Lee a écrit :
http://home.iprimus.com.au/heygoose/1BackwStrap.JPG
http://home.iprimus.com.au/heygoose/1FrontwStrap.JPG
On Ebay, # 3837417201,
1500 $
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 18:06:33 +0300, Boros Attila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://ns.atn.ro/~attila/album/
These are my first scans with the new scanner. Photos taken in the
Botanical Garden at Cluj, Romania. There will be some more, but I'm
yet to scan those.
I spent a pleasant morning
On 1 Sep 2004 at 23:37, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I work on a Mac. I'm not sure what you're working on. But I use a
generic RGB color profile and the ColrSynch workflow. I convert RAW in
PhotoShop CS, sharpening and adjusting other parameters as my eye sees
it. Then I convert to a 144
Hello.
Currently I'm using a 50mm 1.7 A, an I like that lens. I'm looking for a
second 50mm lens because one lens can not sit on both bodies (ist and
MZ-5) at the same time. (And I hate swapping lenses.).
I know an M lens won't function properly on the ist, but how does an M
lens function on
Michel,
Apropos, l'appareil sur eBay est la deuxieure que j'ai d'acheter et je
souhait le vendre..
Salut,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Michel Carrère-Gée [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: 50th Anniv Ltd Ed. *ist D pics
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Henri Toivonen wrote:
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Henri Toivonen wrote:
So the question is, should I pop up the flash for the TTL to function,
or something else?
No, at least not in the SFXn and the MZs I have.
So what could it be?
I would
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Henri Toivonen wrote:
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Henri Toivonen wrote:
So the question is, should I pop up the flash for the TTL to function,
or something else?
No, at least not in the
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Jim Colwell wrote:
Thanks for the link - I haven't been there before. They list 3 SMC Pentax
18/3.5, plus a number of other relatively rare SMCP lenses. I've added many
to SPLOSdb for the next update.
I checked for about 15 seconds, saw what they were asking for a
Ryan Lee a écrit :
Michel,
Apropos, l'appareil sur eBay est la deuxieure que j'ai d'acheter et je
souhait le vendre..
Tiens, un francophone !
Merci, je vais juste repeindre le mien:-))
Amitiés, Michel
Thanks Amita - the Empire State building has already been put on their list,
as they didn't get to it last time.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 11:20 AM
Subject: RE: OT:
Johan, all my M lenses work perfectly on the MZ-5, which is good because I
still have more M lenses than A or later!
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Johan Uiterwijk Winkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 5:56 PM
Hi, Arnie,
I'm here in Ithaca, and I haven't run out of things to shoot yet ...
gorges and impressive waterfalls, creeks and inlets, an old
industrial side of town and a couple of picturesque college campuses,
farmers' markets and antique shops, the old high school converted to
a downtown
I used Portra 400VC in my 6x7. Negative film scans very nice, and it's
much more forgiving. And Portra colors pop.
Paul
On Sep 2, 2004, at 8:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All.
To the dismay of some ,and to the may of others(me)summer or what
passed as summer is
Stunning Hans
What ever you did with the 3 images to get DOF works wonders.
I'm amazed at the number of good macros i have seen lateley with that lens.
Going on the wish list.lol
Good work
Dave Brooks
I do believe that the K-mount Takumars were labeled Bayonette Takumar. All screw
mounts were takumars: Takumar, Auto Takumar, Super Takumar, or SMC Takumar.
Bayonette Takumars were the economy K-mount lenses before Pentax started selling
rebadged junk.
Anyway that is how I recall it.
--
Kostas
On 2 Sep 2004 at 6:34, Paul Stenquist wrote:
When I open the tiffs in PhotoShop it converts
them to Generic RGB, but there is very little color shift. For most web
use, the PhotoShop CS Generic RGB files look fine and upload without
problem. For PhotoNet pages, I have to use PhotoShop's
I would think the drawback would be a loss of one stop in the viewfinder and on
the sensor. Also any inperfections in that big hunk of glass would affect the
image. Like everywhere else, the only thing you get for nothing is nothing,
everthing else has a cost even if it is hidden at first
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:09:41 -0400, you wrote:
I'm here in Ithaca, and I haven't run out of things to shoot yet ...
gorges and impressive waterfalls, creeks and inlets, an old
industrial side of town and a couple of picturesque college campuses,
farmers' markets and antique shops, the old high
Just as an interesting observation, Dave went digital before almost anyone else
on the list. While all the folks here were crying digital SLR's were too
expensive he bit the bullet and paid the big bucks for a Nikon D1, and has
upgraded to a D2H. Yet unlike most of those here, he has no problem
Toralf Lund wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
[...]
All the above is my personal understanding, and if I'm wrong, the real
experts here will correct me in a hurry! grin
Experts? Hmmm. I shouldn't answer then, I guess...
My understanding is that after the original M42 Takumar lenses were
Thank you all for the comments.
Shel wrote:
SB The first one, Palm Tree in Color, is quite nice. A lot of beginning
SB photogs shoot up into the trees, and most every shot I've seen like that
SB has been terrible: cliche, boring, unimaginative, derivative, poorly
SB composed, and so on.
In fact
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:55:32 -0400, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, it looks like a box turtle to me...
Very nice.
Looks like someone (probably Christian) pissed him off...
vbg
Seriously, I like the way the exposure was handled here. Nice shot.
cheers,
frank
--
The
The M lens will work fine on an MZ-5, just no auto aperture or program
modes. You'll haveto shoot full manual or aperture priority.
I've used both the M50/1.7 and the A50/1.7. Both are excellent lenses,
especially for the price. Some may complain about the focusing feel on
the A lenses, but mine
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:31:41 +0200, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I just found out that I´ve been at it for exactly half a year (26
PAW´s). I´ve tried to keep posting pictures taken within the previous
week, but its hard to get an interesting shot every week so it is time
to stop :-)
Hi all.
Does anyone know when this lens will be available in the US ?
Thanks.
Chris
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:11:45 +0200, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The link:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/paw/paw09.jpg
The technical stuff:
*ist D, DA16-45mm @ 29mm (43mm equiv.), 1/350 sec, f/5.6, 200 ISO.
I really like this one. The concentration on the girl's face is
wonderful.
You'll lose the aperture information in the viewfinder with the M lens,
(but then you didn't have it in manual mode anyway). Some extremely
picky people on this list think there's a huge difference between the M
and A versions. But they are the same optical design, the coatings are
similar,
On 2 Sep 2004 at 21:04, David Mann wrote:
Since you're shooting RAW with Adobe RGB I would suggest setting that
as your working space, and using that colour space to archive your
images.
I suspect in reality the gamut of the cameras RAW output is undefined before the
demosaic transform is
Aren't both the M and A 50/1.7 lenses about the cheapest Pentax
lenses you can find, aside from the 50mm f/2 lenses? Since they're
both wonderfully compact and very sharp, they're also great values.
But don't both of them sell for anywhere from $20 to $40, tops?
They're often the free body
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:05:39 +0200, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Believe it or not, this is Bon Jovi :-)
(name written on the ear tab)
The link:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/paw/paw11.jpg
The tech stuff:
*ist D, DA16-45mm @ 16mm (24mm equiv.), 1/350 sec, f/8, 200 ISO.
Great
Why would Save for Web change the appearance of my files? As I said I have to crank
up brightness considerably and contrast a bit before saving a file for web.
On 2 Sep 2004 at 6:34, Paul Stenquist wrote:
When I open the tiffs in PhotoShop it converts
them to Generic RGB, but there is
On 2 Sep 2004 at 9:09, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I used Portra 400VC in my 6x7. Negative film scans very nice, and it's
much more forgiving. And Portra colors pop.
Got to agree here too, on longer trips I generally take two 67 bodies, one
loaded with Provia 100F and the other with Portra 400VC
I cannot find mine. Are there cables available off the shelf somewhere?
I see cables that look like the correct connector. I don't see anyone
selling a dedicated cable. I would like a longer one (maybe, I don't
remember how long it was) to use it with the Phote Remote Assistant.
Mark Stringer
Does anyone have any views on this Camera?
- Original Message -
From: Mark Stringer
Subject: istD usb cable
I cannot find mine. Are there cables available off the shelf
somewhere?
I see cables that look like the correct connector. I don't see
anyone
selling a dedicated cable. I would like a longer one (maybe, I
don't
Original
From: Peter J. Alling
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 07:02:16 -0700
---
You'll lose the aperture information in the viewfinder with the M lens, (but then you
didn't have it in manual mode anyway). Some extremely picky
On 2 Sep 2004 at 10:10, Peter J. Alling wrote:
You'll lose the aperture information in the viewfinder with the M lens,
(but then you didn't have it in manual mode anyway). Some extremely
picky people on this list think there's a huge difference between the M
and A versions. But they are
This shows the hazards of jumping into a thread somewhere in the middle,
this discussion was about the letter designations ie A, F, AF, FA, M,
(K) on K mount lenses. Then wandered into the names on lenses Pentax vs
Takumar, where unfortunately Pentax decided to use the Takumar name for
second
On 2 Sep 2004 at 14:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would Save for Web change the appearance of my files? As I said I have to
crank up brightness considerably and contrast a bit before saving a file for
web.
I don't know, when I use save for web I can still embed an AdobeRGB profile
if I
Or save for ist ?
Does anyone have any views on this Camera?
Yessir! Your points are well stated, and correct.
I meant my statements about Takumar lenses to apply only to the M42 threaded
lenses...
Thanks for the clarification.
keith whaley
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Keith Whaley wrote:
To pass off screw-mount Takumar lenses as being
You are splitting the light sending some to the viewfinder and some to
the sensor, you lose between 1/3 to a full
stop in exposure, and have a rather dim viewfinder. (I'm not sure about
what effect light leaking through the viewfinder
might have on the exposure as well but it probably isn't
On 2 Sep 2004 at 9:23, graywolf wrote:
I would think the drawback would be a loss of one stop in the viewfinder and on
the sensor. Also any inperfections in that big hunk of glass would affect the
image. Like everywhere else, the only thing you get for nothing is nothing,
everthing else has a
William Robb wrote on 9/2/2004, 10:16 AM:
Pretty sure the camera end is unique to the camera,
What I found interesting is that the Optio 330 cable is the same as the
*ist D but the Optio S and Optio MX share the same cable which is
different than the 330/ist D (these are the 4 cameras I
Dave ... there's another option. Shoot slides and have a nice, large
Ilfochrome print made. You may be very surprised at the results ;-))
Shel Belinkoff
People who hate cats will come back as mice in their next life.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would i be better off just sticking with print
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Christien Bunting wrote:
Does anyone have any views on this Camera?
I think you will find plenty if you search for MZ-6 (same camera) on
the archive.
Kostas
Well, AFAIK it's an MZ-6 with a data back. So, if you disregard the data
back, this recent thread might be useful:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg198866.html
Hope this helps,
Z.
At 16:27 02/09/04, you wrote:
--
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 10:15:49 -0400
I don't think anyone knows when it will be available anywhere as of yet.
Christien Bunting wrote:
Hi all.
Does anyone know when this lens will be available in the US ?
Thanks.
Chris
--
Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is a virtue. Fleas are interested
in dogs.
P. J.
Peter J. Alling wrote:
This shows the hazards of jumping into a thread somewhere in the middle,
this discussion was about the letter designations ie A, F, AF, FA, M,
(K) on K mount lenses.
The post by John Francis (copied below) named Takumar-A and Takumar-F, as
tho' they existed.
It was
CRB wrote:
Original
From: Peter J. Alling
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 07:02:16 -0700
---
You'll lose the aperture information in the viewfinder with the M lens, (but then you didn't have it in manual mode anyway). Some
On 2 Sep 2004 at 8:55, Mark Stringer wrote:
I cannot find mine. Are there cables available off the shelf somewhere?
I see cables that look like the correct connector. I don't see anyone
selling a dedicated cable. I would like a longer one (maybe, I don't
remember how long it was) to use it
keller.schaefer wrote:
M lenses will work just fine on the MZ-5 (in M or aperture priority mode) -
because the MZ-5 has the aperture coupler that tells the body how much the lens
has been stopped down. Even if you don't like doing that ;-) I recommend you
take the lenses off both cameras and
Alan Chan wrote:
I know an M lens won't function properly on the ist, but how does an
M lens function on the MZ-5 ?
Will work fine. You can even mask the lens mount so that the
multi-segment meter will work. However, I have found my Z-1p
overexpose with any pre-F lenses. For instance, M135/3.5
Comments interspersed:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:26:04 -0700, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank
Fair enough, although on my monitor, even with more light than usual in the
room, the couple is seen clearly. True, they are a bit on the dark side,
which was my intention as I
I think that this might be an acceptable loss given the smooth
operation. Also, I never notice the viewfinder as being particularly
dark. OTOH, that was a f2-2.4 zoom.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
Yes.
Christien Bunting wrote:
Does anyone have any views on this Camera?
--
Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is a virtue. Fleas are interested
in dogs.
P. J. O'Rourke
The Diabolical Dr Z wrote:
Well, AFAIK it's an MZ-6 with a data back. So, if you disregard the
data back, this recent thread might be useful:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg198866.html
I might perhaps add that I didn't buy the camera, or at least haven't
done so yet, but I had
One thing that everyone seems to be missing is that the M and the A lenses
may provide different results wrt color. That may be an issue for some
people under some circumstances, such as photographing the same subject
using the different lenses. IOW, the benefit of using one series or
another
Johan Uiterwijk Winkel wrote:
keller.schaefer wrote:
M lenses will work just fine on the MZ-5 (in M or aperture priority
mode) -
because the MZ-5 has the aperture coupler that tells the body how
much the lens
has been stopped down. Even if you don't like doing that ;-) I
recommend you
take the
Keith Whaley wrote:
Peter J. Alling wrote:
This shows the hazards of jumping into a thread somewhere in the
middle, this discussion was about the letter designations ie A, F,
AF, FA, M, (K) on K mount lenses.
The post by John Francis (copied below) named Takumar-A and Takumar-F,
as tho'
Joe Wilensky wrote:
Aren't both the M and A 50/1.7 lenses about the cheapest Pentax lenses
you can find, aside from the 50mm f/2 lenses? Since they're both
wonderfully compact and very sharp, they're also great values. But
don't both of them sell for anywhere from $20 to $40, tops? They're
Thanx for the information. Now they only reason not to get an 'M'
lens is the 'Pentax *ist D junior'. Are there any wizards who can
tell me if that one will have a crippled lens interface :-)
No. I have, however, been lead to believe that 'M' lenses are quite
usable on the *istD even though
I have a problem that's a bit bizarre, The finder is now jammed on one
of my LXin, it could have happened at any time
in the last few weeks but I just noticed it yesterday when I wanted to
remove the finder and use the screen at waist level
for a candid. The damned thing wouldn't come off. I
On 2/9/04, Toralf Lund, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sincerely and without bullocks (What's a bullock, anyway?),
bullock
noun [C]
a young male cow that has had its testicles removed
bollock
noun [C]
one of those testicles
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 2/9/04, Ryan Lee, discombobulated, unleashed:
The things you'll do when you have a crush on 99..
Cheers,
Ryan
You're too young to remember Get Smart!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
original -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 08:04:31 -0700
-
One thing that everyone seems to be missing is that the M and the A lenses
may provide different results wrt color. That may be an
The f2.0's are free body caps, the f1.7's especially the A's and later
can get to be quite expensive.
Joe Wilensky wrote:
Aren't both the M and A 50/1.7 lenses about the cheapest Pentax lenses
you can find, aside from the 50mm f/2 lenses? Since they're both
wonderfully compact and very sharp,
On 2 Sep 2004 at 11:33, Peter J. Alling wrote:
I have a problem that's a bit bizarre, The finder is now jammed on one
of my LXin, it could have happened at any time
in the last few weeks but I just noticed it yesterday when I wanted to
remove the finder and use the screen at waist level
JB This reminds me of Monty Python
JB ...I will not buy this record, it is scratched!
JB No, no, no. Tobacconist!
JB ... I will not buy this tobacconist, it is scratched!
JB http://www.serve.com/bonzai/monty/classics/TheHungarianPhrasebookSketch
LOL ;-)
So the good Hungarians on the list
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 2:20:36 AM, Paul wrote:
PS I removed my *istD hot shoe cover the first time I used a flash and
PS never put it back. It's somewhere in the bottom of my Pelican case
PS where it shall remain for the duration.
PS Paul
PS On Sep 1, 2004, at 5:59 PM, Ryan Lee wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 11:33:40 -0400, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem that's a bit bizarre, The finder is now jammed on one
of my LXin, it could have happened at any time
in the last few weeks but I just noticed it yesterday when I wanted to
remove the finder and use
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:48:17 +0200, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it's a big conspiracy of the camera companies, you see. They make
all the expensive little piece of cheap plastic or rubber
accessories easily misplacable (I lost the rubber eyecup from my
non-Pentax DSLR on the first
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:29:57 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're too young to remember Get Smart!
We live in a universe of re-runs. BTW, ever consider using the Cone
of Silence, Cotty?
vbg
cheers,
frank - who's definitely not too young!
--
The optimist thinks this is the best
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 12:48:06 AM, Rob wrote:
RS On 1 Sep 2004 at 15:37, Frantisek wrote:
You mean like this ;-)
http://members.chello.cz/fotof/temp/gaffa.jpg
RS Man that looks beaten and abused, it is it an M4-P?
Guessed right, M4-P. I couldn't afford M6. It's been used by a PJ
Looks like we're gonna get together for a bit tomorrow . Should be fun.
No bunny ears, I promise. I'm going to let her use my MX, though
(we're gonna go do some shooting, I think).
Full report to follow!
cheers,
frank
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
I don't know a solution :-( Good luck with it!
fra
See, im very temped to get a Maxxum 70, seeing that I have a 70-210F4 lens
for it. However I have 4 Pentax lenses and 2 bodies(ZX-50 and a Ricoh XR-10
super-which I love). Waiting on the new 100mm F2.8 macro really. Now if
it's worth it ( the mz-6/zx-l ) I'll spring for it ( it's $189 at
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 6:33:18 PM, Caveman wrote:
C LOL:
C http://www.pbase.com/image/33220568
Finally, a Leica with bollocks! It would be good for posed
environmental portraiture though, everybody would smile at you and
would take pride in posing for you ;-)
fra
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:38:37 -0400, Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/image/33324162
http://www.pbase.com/image/33324101
Which one do you guys preffer and why ?
Cheers !
I think they're both strong images, Val. I like the second one,
because there's more fog or
ft Does Pentax make eyeglass lenses? I know Nikon does, and it seems to
ft me that someone here once said that Pentax does as well.
ft So, there you have it! That's why the rubber eyecups never stay on.
ft The right lens of my eyeglasses is all scratched to hell because my
ft Pentax bodies have
We can't see you behind the snow banks and the polar bears!
frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:31:48 -0400, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, the Brit's actually recognized that there was a Canada...
Now if we could only get you 'Murricans to realize that we're up
Not sure about eyeglass lenses, but the diopter adapter I have for my
SuperProgram usually ends up rattling around in the bottom of my
Lowepro...
Luckily the camera has enough eye relief that I can use it with my
glasses on, most of the time...
-Mat
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:59:55 -0400, Herb Chong wrote:
no it won't. i have revived many drives with broken partition tables this
way. repartition identically to what originally was there and if the FAT
isn't corrupted too, the drive is back. there is nothing physically wrong
with the drive from his
Thanks Frank. It's Lac Ha! Ha! (no not a joke, it's marked as such on
the map too) in the Laurentides, you can get there on route 381. A
really *beautiful* area. Highly recommended, no matter if you go for
taking pics, fishing or just sightseeing.
Hey you forgot the compulsory beaver joke ;-)
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
We can't see you behind the snow banks and the polar bears!
frank theriault wrote:
Now if we could only get you 'Murricans to realize that we're up here...
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Northern Hemisphere, Southern New England, USA Average Daily
Temperature for the past few days 80° F. (Quite hot
actually), unfortunately no.
Ah, rats! Mind you, I don't work well in those sort of temperatures. I hope
it is a simple fix.
Malcolm
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:33:18 -0400, Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL:
http://www.pbase.com/image/33220568
Some guy at who sells cameras at a local flea market had an old m39
Leica (can't remember which one, probably one of the III's) with that
bulk back.
He was asking $10,000 Cdn.
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 13:09:36 -0400, Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Frank. It's Lac Ha! Ha! (no not a joke, it's marked as such on
the map too) in the Laurentides, you can get there on route 381. A
really *beautiful* area. Highly recommended, no matter if you go for
taking pics,
Thanks Shel for that indea.
Not really knowing what Ilfochrome is, i did a Google and found The LightRooms site
on
the net. Near
or in Berkley it looks like.
Some nice samples there and probably would fit the bill.
Now to see if anyone in this area still does that.
Dave Brooks
Caveman wrote on 9/2/2004, 12:38 PM:
http://www.pbase.com/image/33324162
This one.
Better composition: i like the single boat in the left corner. I also
think the single boat gives a more lonely/solitary feel to the picture
which creates a cool mood overall.
--
Christian
[EMAIL
frank theriault wrote on 9/2/2004, 12:59 PM:
I think I prefer the first one, though. The solitary kayak, the
mountain on the right, sticking out of the lake like some sort of a
lone sentinal - to me it speaks to the isolation of the wilderness -
definitely a different mood from the
More of them:
http://www.pbase.com/image/33220570
Wonder what's the use of that hinge for. An accessory for crushing your
bo...cks after you accidentally open the back of those critters in
daylight and ruin all of them last 1000 or so photos ?
;-)
frank theriault wrote:
Some guy at who sells
As a rule, anytime you have two lenses that are similar in focal length, it's
useful to differentiate them to add flexibility.
For example, I use two normal lenses:
1. f/2 to f/4: Rikenon 50/2P
2. f/5.6 to f/16: Pentax SMC 55/1.8K
I prefer the Rikenon for available light; otherwise, I prefer
Thanks for that guys.
I do remember trying some Portra 160 and maybe the 400VC when i was searching for a
film
that i
liked in the 6x7.(settled on Reala but the Portra was good IIRK) Seems to me that i did
not poo poo it
to much.vbg
Sounds like a good way to go. Some Portra in the 6x7
Since the price drop has been announced ...
Does anyone yet know what it will be?
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
-
'Every one of us is, even from his mother's womb, a master craftsman of idols.'
-- John Calvin (1509-64)
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
