On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:00:50 +0200, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK folks, a night has passed but I don't feel so much better.
> When the effort exceeds the enjoyment it's time to stop, isn't it?
> Bye and al the best,
>
> Dario Bonazza
>
Like several others who've posted on thi
Hi Frank ...
Just one comment on your comment about my comment: we indeed see view
photos differently. I tend to get locked into a more conventional way of
seeing things, and there are times when I want to break out of that
conservative mold (define mold any way you want ) With that said,
regard
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:31:08 +0100, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Cousin It lives!
Took the words right out of my mouth!!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:38:28 -0700, Pat White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last week I was watching Fashion Television (they often do segments on
> fashion and art photographers), and saw a bit on the 4th annual Naked in the
> House competition. It's a location shoot, with only 10 photographers
>
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 04:46:34 -0700, Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thing is, they NEVER put bus terminals in decent places, do they?
>
If they put bus terminals in nice places, the inevitable "Terminal
Cafe" would lose it's irony...
Too bad they're almost gone now (Terminal Cafe's
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:37:34 +0100, Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Caveman wrote:
> > I still wonder where you focused. Or didn't you ? Oh these lazy
> > youngsters.
>
> That's not unfocussed, it's *theriaultian*.
>
Yes!
It's "not unfocussed". I like that terminology.
Of course,
Just in case you don't know what Cotty is referring to:
http://www.k12.nf.ca/roncallips/familyliving/addams%20fam/cousin_itt.htm
Maciej Marchlewski wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Well, in 70s I only got what I was boprn with and not much more, but
here's a pic from the late 90's:
http://www.kajko.wdb.p
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:57:14 -0700, Shel Belinkoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some people have lives of comfort and luxury, and can be entertained by
> breakfast in a warm, comfortable bed: juice, toast, coffee, the morning
> paper, all delivered and presented by someone who cares for them. Othe
mike wilson wrote:
Well, in 70s I only got what I was boprn with and not much more, but
here's a pic from the late 90's:
http://www.kajko.wdb.pl/to_sem_ja.jpg
We have a definite winner! That's about the same length as mine but I
have no presentable evidence.
For now it just proofs tahat I was
Honestly, I'm not arguing with you in this reply, Shel. Normally I
don't comment on comments - I mean after all, I asked for comments, so
I don't want to be seen as taking someoen to task for doing exactly
what I asked them to do. In fact, I'm not taking you to task, I guess
I'm about to indicate
On 29/10/04, Maciej Marchlewski, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Well, in 70s I only got what I was boprn with and not much more, but
>here's a pic from the late 90's:
>http://www.kajko.wdb.pl/to_sem_ja.jpg
ROTFL
Cousin It lives!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pasti
Flat on it's back.
Feet in the air.
Belly up.
Out to lunch.
Bought the farm.
DOA.
Etc.
Cotty wrote:
And, for that matter, why does "tits up" mean "broken"?
It means that it is lying on its back I think I won't pursue that
analogy any further.
Slipped and fallen over.
My PE instructor in 7th
Hi,
Friday, October 29, 2004, 9:50:56 PM, Shel wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> She wasn't making a pitch at all. She wasn't asking anything from anyone.
Hi,
> She wasn't making a pitch at all. She wasn't asking anything from anyone.
I don't think Mike meant it that way. Over here if you pitch a tent it
On 29/10/04, jtainter, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Five'll get you ten that there is a blueprint somewhere whose title reads:
>
>Telecommunication Interface Erect Stance Lightly Hooded Mini Vestibule Thing
>
>Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
>-
>
>Ah, Cotty, you're wonderful.
On 29/10/04, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I just ordered yesterday, a Lexar 1GB 40x High Speed Compact Flash Card,
>from tigerdirect.com for $89.99 w/$30 rebate. Shipping was about $10 which
>is outrageous. Still compared to my first 1GB card purchased in Febrauary,
>it was a great dea
That's good to know about the curved filters. I usually just take filters
off when doing such shooting. I'll have to look into getting some of those.
Dave
This Asahi filter is a UV filter. What I don't know is: will
"no-filter" also give ghost images? If not, no filter is better than
UV filte
>> And, for that matter, why does "tits up" mean "broken"?
>
>It means that it is lying on its back I think I won't pursue that
>analogy any further.
Slipped and fallen over.
My PE instructor in 7th grade called it going 'butt over tea-kettle' :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Good idea - why didn't I think about the obvious thing first?
I'll try tomorrow.
thanks,
Sam
- Original Message -
From: "Graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: Slim or normal filter for DA-14?
Why not take the camera and
Hi,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
She wasn't making a pitch at all.
The barrier of a common language rears its head again. I meant pitch as
in camping, not as in place to sell your wares. It's such an odd place
for some one to have (presumably) slept, that it looks like you have
said to a model "We
Was Dave Brooks the only one besides me who saw the item about the Naked in
the House competition? 12 photographers, each with only one camera, one
lens, one roll of film, and only 30 minutes with the model to produce a
winning photo.
More info at: http://www.pulse24.com/Showbiz/Top_Story/2004
I know someone who cut split screens for the *istD from some other pentax
split screens, so maybe they can be cut for other cameras, too.
And there are 3rd party dealers like Intenscreen who sell focusing screens,
too.
There should be a list of available screens somewhere in the net I'd say.
Sa
It's always worth looking at outpost.com for this kind of stuff, too.
Tom C mused:
>
> I just ordered yesterday, a Lexar 1GB 40x High Speed Compact Flash Card,
> from tigerdirect.com for $89.99 w/$30 rebate. Shipping was about $10 which
> is outrageous. Still compared to my first 1GB card pu
Thanks, Ann. I finally got tired of grooming it and cut my hair short in
1982, after I'd been shooting with my MX for 2 years (Pentax content).
Pat White
Somehow, Maris I don't think ~you~ need a wake-up call ... some people,
however, most certainly do.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Maris V. Lidaka Sr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Good photo, Shel - your photos are often a wake-up call to those of us
more
> fortunate.
>
> Maris
>
> Shel Belinkoff
Hi Mike,
She wasn't making a pitch at all. She wasn't asking anything from anyone.
For whatever reason she just wanted to stretch out there and enjoy whatever
comfort she could take from that place at that time. She didn't even ask me
for anything, and we spoke for a while. As for her posing, w
It was pretty early one morning when I saw what appeared to be a pile of
rags on the sidewalk. No one was around. I went over to see what was up,
and there was this woman, lounged out there, having eaten or just about to
eat her Burger King breakfast, enjoying a cigarette, and apart from the
loca
If everything were normal the tits would be down, (think Cow).
John Francis wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
From: "John Whittingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2004/10/29 Fri AM 09:14:15 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - English Summer (was: Re: Zoom vs Prime)
Hi Cotty
Up in the Gr
Good light to ya.
Come back to the list later. We'll welcome you back.
Cory
has been here long enough to remember most of the people that come up in
those "remember when X was on the list?" threads.
- Original Message -
From: "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
Five'll get you ten that there is a blueprint somewhere whose title reads:
Telecommunication Interface Erect Stance Lightly Hooded Mini Vestibule Thing
Cheers,
Cotty
-
Ah, Cotty, you're wonderful. This made my afternoon.
This is so redeeming that I recommend
David Madsen wrote on 10/29/2004, 4:12 PM:
> Isn't it amazing how one's perspective is influenced by one's situation.
> For instance, when I first looked at the photo I saw dispair and felt
> lucky
> that I was not in that situation. Upon closer inspection I noticed
> that the
> woman is
Now, if anybody could tell me what is better Soligor 20/2.8 or Mir 20/2.5 I would be
happy. :)
- Original Message -
From: "Mishka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: Russian lenses
> not zenitar. zenitar is fine.
>
> mir 20
Portraits of the Less Fortunate, as Shel calls them, can be
interesting. With Shel's intro it seems like we're supposed to feel
sorry for this lady, for all the obvious social reasons.This photo
fails to provoke such emotions with me. She's just an obese woman,
smoking and munching junk food on the
Absolutely boring. No novel subject, no interesting framing, point of
view, lighting or postprocessing whatsoever.
The only interesting part is that you are attracted to do this every so
often.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/b-in-b.html
Isn't it amazing how one's perspective is influenced by one's situation.
For instance, when I first looked at the photo I saw dispair and felt lucky
that I was not in that situation. Upon closer inspection I noticed that the
woman is smiling. Even in her situation she still has something to smile
John Francis wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
From: "John Whittingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2004/10/29 Fri AM 09:14:15 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - English Summer (was: Re: Zoom vs Prime)
Hi Cotty
Up in the Great North West LOl, sorry for delayed replies my webmail went
tits u
That's good to know about the curved filters. I usually just take filters
off when doing such shooting. I'll have to look into getting some of those.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dario Bonazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 7:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
Good photo, Shel - your photos are often a wake-up call to those of us more
fortunate.
Maris
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Some people have lives of comfort and luxury, and can be entertained
> by breakfast in a warm, comfortable bed: juice, toast, coffee, the
> morning paper, all delivered and present
These are very valid points - I love my istD even though I am not blind to
it's weaknesses. I love all of my cameras and each one of them has some
weakness or another, that's the way it goes. That said, it is hard to
listen to people bash on your decisions based on their own, probably very
differ
Dario,
I've enjoyed your contributions and insights into things Pentax over
the years. I still don't own a *istD but am glad to have your
recommendations. Hurry back...
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:29:06 -0600, David Madsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You will be greatly missed, you
Me, too!
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:13 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Bye...
On 29/10/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>It's those silent people that should speak up more often. Their views are
>important a
You will be greatly missed, you are one of my favorite contributors to this
list.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dario Bonazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 6:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bye...
OK folks, a night has passed but I don't feel so much bett
Pat White wrote:
> Thanks for posting the pictures, Dario! Now I'm wondering, what did you
> look like in the 70s?
>
> Pat White
Pat, I think you tied me for longest hair...
pretty impressive!
annsan
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
> OK, nothing spectacular, especially in digital era :-) But I couldn't resist
> and bought nice KX Still great camera, with enough features for good
> photography in its pure form... Beautiful body finishing quality, nice
> shutter sound. True pleasure to use, despit
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
Tamron performs really well for a non SMC lens, but shows a
strange kind of reflections, as it sometimes duplicates small,
strong lights on the scene (and it is not predictable in the
finder, so I guess it is a problem of reflections of light
hitting the sensor and th
Maciej Marchlewski wrote:
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
So, who of us had the longest hair, then?
Pictures, please...
Well, in 70s I only got what I was boprn with and not much more, but
here's a pic from the late 90's:
http://www.kajko.wdb.pl/to_sem_ja.jpg
We have a definite winner! That's about the
Hi,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/b-in-b.html
That's weird. If I was in that social position, I would not be
comfortable making my pitch in the middle of the pavement. It looks
almost posed.
BTW, did you ever manage to resend the cheque? I can't get through to
you
Hi,
John Francis wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
From: "John Whittingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2004/10/29 Fri AM 09:14:15 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - English Summer (was: Re: Zoom vs Prime)
Hi Cotty
Up in the Great North West LOl, sorry for delayed replies my webmail went
tit
I just ordered yesterday, a Lexar 1GB 40x High Speed Compact Flash Card,
from tigerdirect.com for $89.99 w/$30 rebate. Shipping was about $10 which
is outrageous. Still compared to my first 1GB card purchased in Febrauary,
it was a great deal.
I think they also have a Sandisk 4 GB card for $3
No more...
Kingston has run out of the cards for this special and so have I.
So far Paul Setnquist has paid for the ones he requested. I have 5 left
at this point. There are 5 or 6 other people who expressed varying
levels of interest so I'm going to go on a first-come-first serve basis.
Limit of
I do not agree. The volume of this list is so big - overwhelming - so it
would be really good if only those who have something to contribute
contributed.
I´m not sure if I have something to contribute but you get my point... do
you?
Not good to see Dario go because he has made his share of contr
"Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:50:37 -0600, William Robb wrote:
>
>> > With weather like that, why didn't you become Italians several
>> > centuries ago. :-)
>>
>> More amazing, is that the Italians bothered occupying the place.
>
>That I can almost understand.
Some people have lives of comfort and luxury, and can be entertained by
breakfast in a warm, comfortable bed: juice, toast, coffee, the morning
paper, all delivered and presented by someone who cares for them. Others
don't have quite the same luxuries, but still can enjoy a simpler, and
perhaps no
"Ryan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm interested in a couple of those- was trying to send a note to you
>offlist, but for some reason I just kept gettings a 'mail delivery failure,
>connection not authorised'. Is it a mail filter or is something wrong on my
>end?
My hosting service has some
Thanks for posting the pictures, Dario! Now I'm wondering, what did you
look like in the 70s?
Pat White
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
So, who of us had the longest hair, then?
Pictures, please...
Well, in 70s I only got what I was boprn with and not much more, but
here's a pic from the late 90's:
http://www.kajko.wdb.pl/to_sem_ja.jpg
Cheers,
Maciej
Somewhere around here I have a skyline photo taken with the Tokina and a plain
jane Vivitar 2x. I will try and find it an put up a scan.
--
Doug Franklin wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:48:15 -0600, William Robb wrote:
I've used it with the 2X-S and found it to be surprisingly good.
The lens is pr
For those that might want a bigger card, PC Mall -pcmall.com- offers 1GB Sandisk High
Speed Ultra II CF card for $87 with a $15 mail in rebate, offer good till the end of
OCT.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Oct 29, 2004 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Why not take the camera and lens into your dealers and ask them to let you try
the filter. Nice thing about digital is you don't even have to waste a roll of film.
--
Sam Jost wrote:
Hi!
I just received my DA-14 and would like to attack an UV filter to it for
lens protection.
With a lens this w
*exactly*.
:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:56:07 +0200, Jostein wrote:
>
> > Honestly, I'd be more worried if EVERYONE looked strange...
>
> In that case, you're still the strange one ... normal has just been
> redefine
Good to see you stepping out & learning.
With the more powerful lights you can always turn the power down as needed.
But having one or two depends on what you're shooting. Having units with modeling
lamps is important, imnsho. You can see more of what is going on.
With one light, get a large r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
>
>
> >
> > From: "John Whittingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2004/10/29 Fri AM 09:14:15 GMT
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: OT - English Summer (was: Re: Zoom vs Prime)
> >
> > Hi Cotty
> >
> > Up in the Great North West LOl, sorry for delayed replies
Hi all,
I'm giving some serious thought to purchasing
Adorama's Flashpoint II 620 strobe kit. They were
written up in this month's Pop Photo magazine. I'm
thinking of starting with this one-light kit (w/ a
more powerful 300 w/s), as opposed to say a SP Studio
Systems 2-light kit. My reasoning i
I think that you just ran into the "my new toy syndrome". Folks do not want to
hear that their new toy is not perfect. They will defend their toy to the death.
All of that is just basic human psychology. No need to get upset.
However, I can understand the aggravation you feel when you are wantin
Me too.
> -Original Message-
> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 October 2004 17:13
> To: pentax list
> Subject: Re: Bye...
>
>
> On 29/10/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >It's those silent people that should speak up more often.
> Their views
> >a
On 29/10/04, Steve Jolly, discombobulated, unleashed:
>> Hey join the queue Jolly
>
>Whoops - have I offended the Sekrit PDML Cabal of Acronym Authorisers
>(SPCAA) or something?
No no no no no. Ryan's pic of the lass - swon.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
On 29/10/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>It's those silent people that should speak up more often. Their views are
>important and valuable contributions, even if they're expressed only as a
>short "me too" or "I agree" note.
I agree.
D'OH!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O
I bought the 16-45 with the D, with the rebate the lens was only about
$200.00 US.
Don't really use it much but it is a very fine piece of glass.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
Having been recently introduced to the pleasures of the KM, KX cameras, and
knowing that a split image focusing screen was available, I wonder if a
standard screen can be replaced by a split image screen. If so, I'd
suppose finding a split image screen may be a bit of a challenge. Are
screens fro
Thanks Stephen! I'm not sure how often a stock agency gets a request for a
woodturning picture, but seeing how I've never submitted anything to a stock
agency, I'll take your word for it! How does one get involved with a stock
agency anyway?
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Step
lol! If only!
He's referring to the imaginary buy-a-kiss queue :-)
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Jolly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: PESO Found some time to put some shots together
> Cotty wrote:
>
Also FS (non-Pentax items):
A 67mm Quantaray circular polarizer, LN condition, with plastic case. $20.
A Polaroid SX-70 kit with separate third-party (Focal) electronic
flash. This is the original SX-70, sleek and well-engineered, made of
aluminum and that leather-type material. It's not the very
Still available for sale:
SMC-FA 28mm f/2.8, LN- condition. Includes caps, original
box/packaging, and I'll throw in the proper Pentax soft lens case.
$140.
SMC-F 70-210mm f/4-5.6, bargain+ condition. Heavy-duty and well-made
body shows some wear on sharp edges, but glass is beautiful. Includes
It wasn't the DG- just the EX DF (the first incarnation wasn't DF, i.e. no
focus 'clutch'- think those float about the used market quite often..) Have
they released the DG 28-70 2.8 already? Guess I haven't been keeping up to
date. When I purchased mine 3 years ago, it was just before the 24-70 2.
This one is surplus to my requirements because I do not have any AF bodies.
The flash has no external sensor, TTL only, works with the current
generation of AF Pentaxes.
Would 30 euros be a good price? Mail me off-list.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupun
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 29 Oct 2004 at 9:46, Steve Jolly wrote:
I would just mention
that JPEG compression also introduces artefacts that look very similar
to the ones you mention here - did you check the web versions to make
sure that nothing extra was introduced?
Hi Steve,
A very fair questio
Does the name Oswego, N.Y. ring a bell. Growing up in N.J. in the late 50's, we'd hear
about the massive amounts of snowfall in & around Oswego, phenominal amounts. A good
winter in NJ would yield 20 to 40 inches of snow, while Oswego regularily got that
much in a single dump.
& No, I don't wan
On 29 Oct 2004 at 9:46, Steve Jolly wrote:
> I would just mention
> that JPEG compression also introduces artefacts that look very similar
> to the ones you mention here - did you check the web versions to make
> sure that nothing extra was introduced?
Hi Steve,
A very fair question, I did tr
Steve Jolly wrote:
> Get out there and take some fantastic photos. :-)
There are a few among the many I took last month in Cologne that I planned
to post for PAW/PESO, but still haven't had the time to choose.
Some of them will probably show up in my website sooner or later.
Thanks,
Dario
Although i dont make a habit to find and watch the show my self,i do tune in once and a
while for a
few minuites and have noticed the same thing Pat.
I see quite a few use the 6x7. :-)
I saw a show ,maybe the first or second annual Naked in the House and was fasinated by
the
idea.
A local Roge
It's those silent people that should speak up more often. Their views are
important and valuable contributions, even if they're expressed only as a
short "me too" or "I agree" note.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> please bear in mind that a
> significant m
AF200T
In generally good condition but has had a minor battery leak.
One spring has corrosion. A good cleaning of the top of it
will give you a fully functional flash @ a reasonable price.
With case.
The "T" model flashes are analog & have the TTL setting.
A perfect compact flas
Cotty wrote:
Hey join the queue Jolly
Whoops - have I offended the Sekrit PDML Cabal of Acronym Authorisers
(SPCAA) or something?
S
Dario Bonazza wrote:
OK folks, a night has passed but I don't feel so much better.
Hey Dario; best wishes for a PDML-free period, and I shall hope to see
you return at some point in the future. I know how annoying it can get
when the same old misconceptions keep rearing their heads on this list
Well, I don't follow the *istD threads, but It appears that some folks have
driven off another venerated old-timer and valuable resource.
Congratulations to the lot of ya for your dubious accomplishment.
Regards,
Bob...
---
"No man's life, liberty or property is safe while
On 29/10/04, Steve Jolly, discombobulated, unleashed:
>That's more of a WBOPAAO (Whole Bunch Of Photos All At Once) :-)
>
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2755889 is very cool indeed.
> As are many of the others, but that one in particular caught my eye.
>
>S
Hey join the queue Jol
On 29/10/04, John Whittingham, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Up in the Great North West LOl, sorry for delayed replies my webmail went
>tits up for a couple of days!!!
Oh bloody hell that explains it then mate ;-)
The weather up there is a lada sheeyite.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
Steve Larson wrote:
> Hi Dario,
> You haven't "disturbed" any normal people.
I suspected that, but sometimes a confirmation helps. Thanks.
> Please reconsider.
Sorry, not at this time. Maybe one next day (week, month, year...) I'll
strike back :-)
Dario
On 28/10/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I do tend to be pretty confrontational.
>Mr. Sensitivity I am decidedly not.
>
>William Robb
And that's just his wife speaking
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.c
I've used a normal SMC Pentax UV-filter since I got the lens, and haven't seen any
problems.
Some sample pictures are here:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=408620
DagT
>
> fra: "Sam Jost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> dato: 2004/10/29 fr PM 01:58:46 CEST
> til: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> emne
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
> Tamron performs really well for a non SMC lens, but shows a
> strange kind of reflections, as it sometimes duplicates small,
> strong lights on the scene (and it is not predictable in the
> finder, so I guess it is a problem of reflections of light
> hitting the sensor
Hi Dario,
You haven't "disturbed" any normal people. Please reconsider.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 5:00 AM
Subject: Bye...
> OK folks, a night has passed
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
> The
> Tamron performs really well for a non SMC lens, but shows a
> strange kind of reflections, as it sometimes duplicates small,
> strong lights on the scene (and it is not predictable in the
> finder, so I guess it is a problem of reflections of light
> hitting the s
Hi Dario,
The list can be a frustrating place sometime.
Good luck and chat to you soon.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Andre Langevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already have a 24-90mm and rarely go to 90mm so performance
from
> 24mm to 75mm is what interests me. Portability is not a key
feature.
> Only optical performance (including flare control).
>
> Thanks,
Hi Andre,
I own both and a couple of weeks ag
I don't have the $5000.
- Original Message -
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: Tokina AT-X 80-200 2.8 manual focus with 2X teleconverter
> you haven't compared the output.
>
> Herb...
> - Original Me
Ryan Lee wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=309526
Comments appreciated!
Nice work!
"Bruce Woodturning," "Kaz," and "Abandon Tree" are
my favorites. "Woodturning" would make a heckuva good
stock shot.
Best,
Stephen Moore
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:50:37 -0600, William Robb wrote:
> > With weather like that, why didn't you become Italians several
> > centuries ago. :-)
>
> More amazing, is that the Italians bothered occupying the place.
That I can almost understand. The yen for someplace different, and all
that.
TT
> Are you allowed to say tits on College webmail? Or on PDML? Let's see if
the spam filter
pick it up
>
> mike
Isn't it a kind of bird?
(or some kinds of bird?)
ER
And think of long focal length (so much prone to thermal focus shift) on
small format film (so much demanding about proper focus). The Graphic is
another thing: not enough long focus and not enough small format to show the
problem, I guess.
I can assure you that precise focus at infinity is a well-
OK folks, a night has passed but I don't feel so much better.
When the effort exceeds the enjoyment it's time to stop, isn't it?
So I'm very tired I have to explain again and again my arguments and being
misunderstood most of the time.
Maybe I'm not able to express my thoughts well, after all Engli
101 - 200 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
