I just posted my first photo to WebAperture that I have taken with a
Pentax camera. The story and all are on the page. Please let me know
what you think I should have done differently, or better. BTW, the
negative from which I took the scan has been sitting, unprotected,
rolled up in a cupboard
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:17:09 +1100, Trevor Bailey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> G'day Frank.
> Cooee means call, phone, let u know etc etc etc
> Hooroo means good bye, seeya, byebye, pissenzeoffski, etc etc etc'
Thanks, Trevor,
Hooroo I knew (hey, that rhymes! ).
Now I know what Cooee means.
It
On Jan 9, 2005, at 7:46 PM, Alan Chan wrote:
I remember you asked me about the built-in filters of the 15/3.5. I
just relubed my
lens last week and took a snap of the filter disc.
(snip)
Wow, 12 screws just to hold a filter assembly together. And I thought
it was the front element that made the
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:10:32 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arggg.
> I apologize for the bum Flickr link. I swear I'm getting techno dumber as the
> decade goes
> on.I seem
> to have a problem with this photo storage place.
>
> Anyway, here is a few links to pho
G'day Frank.
Cooee means call, phone, let u know etc etc etc
Hooroo means good bye, seeya, byebye, pissenzeoffski, etc etc etc
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor
Australia
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 9 January 2005 5:42 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pd
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:39:41 -0500, Luigi de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Taking pictures of bands is tricky. I can't ever get them all lit and in the
> frame at once, so I have to take pictures of one member at a time. Don't
> know why--I just figure it's worth giving everybody equal t
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:39:41 -0500, Luigi de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 09 January 2005 01:30, frank theriault wrote:
> No, you're making perfect sense.
>
> I know there are an awful lot of them on there. But I guess the non-PDML
> traffic on the my LJ page all know the guys in
On Sunday 09 January 2005 01:44, frank theriault wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:24:19 -0500, Luigi de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I hope you fixed yourself a good sandwich, at least :)
>
> Nah, I did go get a drink though.
>
> Sorry about being snippy. I'm still pissed that
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:51:22 -0500, frank theriault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -frank (who also spent all day watching football - I hate the Jets)
Actually, that's not true. I am frank (that part's true), but
football only started at about 4:30. Before that, I did get to go out
and play with m
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 22:41:03 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've owned this lens for a long time but only used it once in anger. It's
> just been sitting. But there's been a lot of talk about it here lately, so I
> took it out today and shot the goose. I shoot the goose whe
On Sunday 09 January 2005 01:30, frank theriault wrote:
> Okay, now that I've gone and look at the photos, they're mostly okay -
> maybe even pretty good. I think there are too many of them. You
> could probably lose about 1/2 to 2/3 of them, and it would have much
> more impact. For instance,
I remember you asked me about the built-in filters of the 15/3.5. I just
relubed my
lens last week and took a snap of the filter disc. The filters are actually SMC
glasses, about 1mm thick and 1cm diameter (not exact). The edges of the filters
are
half perpendicular (up), and half 45 degree rough
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:24:19 -0500, Luigi de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope you fixed yourself a good sandwich, at least :)
>
Nah, I did go get a drink though.
Sorry about being snippy. I'm still pissed that the goddam Jets beat
the Chargers. I hate the Jets. I like the Charg
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:58:46 +1100, Trevor Bailey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'll give you a Cooee when they arrive.
> Hooroo.
Yer gonna have to use English with us North Americans, Trevor.
Cooee?
Hooroo?
I was going to comment on where your friend is from (Ulladulla), then
realized that in
I'm a dolt. direct links to pictures, a few of 'em:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v293/Brunellus/Sandbox%20Kings%2028%20Dec%2004/Molly.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v293/Brunellus/Sandbox%20Kings%2028%20Dec%2004/Mariachi03.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v293/Brunellus/Sandbox
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Bailey"
Subject: Pentax 67 lens fitted to ZX-L.
G'day All.
I have interested in wether a Pentax 67 lens can be fitted to the
ZX-L.
Yes
Does anyone know if it needs an adaptor?
Yes.
If so, where are they
available?
eBay works sometimes. I managed to buy
On Sunday 09 January 2005 01:22, frank theriault wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:30:24 -0500, Luigi de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > http://www.livejournal.com/users/ouij
> >
> > Finally got around to posting some more concert pics onto the LJ.
> >
> > Comments always welcome.
> >
> > Yeah,
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 22:24:54 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The changing slides don't allow enough time to really look at each photo.
> I don't know about others, but I ike to take my time when looking at photos
> - linger, move forward/back at my own pace. The situation is made
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:22:39 -0500, frank theriault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> They certainly are taking a long time to load (they're still loading
> as I type this - I just got real bored of waiting). Maybe it's my old
> computer, but there are still a few of us using equipment that's a
> cou
The changing slides don't allow enough time to really look at each photo.
I don't know about others, but I ike to take my time when looking at photos
- linger, move forward/back at my own pace. The situation is made worse by
the fact that some pics have to be scrolled in order to see them in the
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:30:24 -0500, Luigi de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.livejournal.com/users/ouij
>
> Finally got around to posting some more concert pics onto the LJ.
>
> Comments always welcome.
>
> Yeah, I know--I'm getting a bit monotonous, subjectwise. I gotta get me so
>Anyone who's had these lenses or similar lenses apart know of a source for
>something that will replace them?
Let me know the length and width of the spring and I'll see if I find anything
that
might work for you.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
On Sunday 09 January 2005 01:09, John Celio wrote:
> > Canon, David, C-A-N-O-N ... why is it that so many people are hesitant to
> > use the names of other camera manufacturers here? There's no such
> > reluctance to use the names of other lenses.
> >
> > CANON NIKON KONICA MINOLTA (See, we're all
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:10:13 +1100, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My first gallery-every-so-often for the year.
>
> Late last year, my friend did a pleasant show at the Tilbury Hotel.
> Special guest singer, Noah Taylor.
>
> http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~derbyc/Tilbury_slowhand/inde
Canon, David, C-A-N-O-N ... why is it that so many people are hesitant to
use the names of other camera manufacturers here? There's no such
reluctance to use the names of other lenses.
CANON NIKON KONICA MINOLTA (See, we're all still breathing and no worse
for
the experience)
What about OLYMPUS?
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 14:38:23 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No sooner do I start using my 35-85 Varifocal Zoom on my *ist-D then the
> aperture ring
> begins to become quite stiff and rough. No problem says I just open 'er
> up and clean out
> the mechanism, it's not like it's
I don't know the lenses are. I haven't seen them as my mate lives in
Ulladulla which is about 9 hours from me.
He is going to bring them up in a month or so.
I'll give you a Cooee when they arrive.
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor
Australia
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Gianfranco,
While I as well have had problems with the battery indicator being
reliable on the *istD, that may not be the problem.
I have seen the striping effect at ISO 1600 and 3200 with good batteries
in the camera. There have been several threads in the Pentax SLR forum
in dpreview about th
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:59:31 +, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Friday, January 7, 2005, 2:57:31 PM, Graywolf wrote:
>
> > Delete in computereze really only means "delete the directory entry" the
> > file
> > remains
>
> Depends on the file system, of course. It can also mean:
>
frank theriault wrote:
An alternate title I was thinking of was, "Please Completely Insert
Your Quarter..."
Foul language warning: If swear-words offend you, don't open this url:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3124455/
Comments are always welcome!
thanks,
frank
Good shot Frank.
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:50:21 -0800, Powell Hargrave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It got a bit white here today.
>
> http://members.shaw.ca/hargravep/Image1.htm
>
> Powell
>
Surely, ~that~ is the mother of all clothes lines!
Cool shot!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."
Actually, the Sony is an early model and is steam powered
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So you've rigged your Sony digicam to run on solar? LOL
>
>
> > I prefer no batteries ...
> >
> > Shel
> >
> >
> > > [Original Message]
> > > From: John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Shel,
Perhaps more of us than you thought have viewed the image.
It seems to me a dark image of a dark place.
Like a Chekov play, it's interesting, but I don't want to see it.
...Too depressing.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:46:54 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dav
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:09:03 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was goofing around with a 135mm lens and playing with some Ilford XP2
> when this little scene appeared. Made a quick grab and then completely
> forgot about the shot. Even overlooked it when viewing the negs through
So you've rigged your Sony digicam to run on solar? LOL
> I prefer no batteries ...
>
> Shel
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > What Battery Type Do You Prefer?
> > http://www.neovenator.com/blogger.html
>
>
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:37:48 +, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/1/05, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Well here it is, what you've all been waiting for. My first PESO taken
> >with the *ist-D. It's not the most
> >inspired photograph I've ever taken. But I've been s
I prefer no batteries ...
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What Battery Type Do You Prefer?
> http://www.neovenator.com/blogger.html
Tongue firmly in cheek, Shel said: Of course, I could clone out the clutter.
Yes you could. Cloning out the clutter is both a blessing and a curse of the
digital age. It can dramatically improve a photo, and it can dramatically
shorten one's play time.
Batteries seem to be a major dicussion point lately. Out of curiosity, I've
put together a quick poll on my weblog:
What Battery Type Do You Prefer?
http://www.neovenator.com/blogger.html
Curious John (Celio) (not a monkey)
--
http://www.neovenator.com
http://www.newpixel.net
AIM: Neopifex
"Hey,
Someone was looking for a link to these lenses, and i deleted the
message by
mistook.
Here is an ex PDMLer's (Ppro) link i visit on occasion.
http://whitemetal.com/pentax/index_pentax_lenses.htm
Oooh, VERY informative site, that one. Too bad it's missing the 18mm f/11
fisheye I have,
Without USM and IS like technology, I am afraid nothing Pentax could do to
impress
high end 135 users.
I hate to say it, but I agree. Pentax needs something to really set it
apart from the other guys. Consistantly making smallest-in-their-class
cameras isn't enough for serious photographers.
Nope, not at all an artful image, but I kinda like it for the story. It's
just a quick little grab shot. Of course, I could clone out the clutter
...
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think the ingredients are here for an interesting story, but
> due to clutter an
Canon, David, C-A-N-O-N ... why is it that so many people are hesitant to
use the names of other camera manufacturers here? There's no such
reluctance to use the names of other lenses.
CANON NIKON KONICA MINOLTA (See, we're all still breathing and no worse for
the experience)
Shel
> [Original
Hi Frank ...
The prints were different sizes. They ranged from being printed on 8x10
through (I think) 20x24 paper. The 16x20 paper was my favorite in most
instances. Of course, the paper used when the prints were first made, Agfa
Brovira, no longer exists (at least as it used to) and if the pr
I think the ingredients are here for an interesting story, but due to clutter
and other composition problems they don't add up to an artful image. However,
it's still worth a look, and I enjoyed it.
Paul
> I was goofing around with a 135mm lens and playing with some Ilford XP2
> when this littl
What 67 lenses do you have? They are very nice used on a 67 body :-).
Paul
> G'day Paul.
> Thanks for the reply.
> I asked because a mate bought a box of stuff at a garage sale and there
> are a couple of these lenses in the box of stuff.
> I have no idea as to what the lenses are.
>
> Thanks.
I was goofing around with a 135mm lens and playing with some Ilford XP2
when this little scene appeared. Made a quick grab and then completely
forgot about the shot. Even overlooked it when viewing the negs through
the loupe. Just caught it by accident this evening. Really don't like the
Ilford
G'day Paul.
Thanks for the reply.
I asked because a mate bought a box of stuff at a garage sale and there
are a couple of these lenses in the box of stuff.
I have no idea as to what the lenses are.
Thanks.
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor
Australia
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailt
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:55:52 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> The frame around the image isn't white. It matches some of the grey tones
> in the image.
Now that you mention it, I now see that you're right.
The photo is supposed to be oppressive.
I was thinking
Battery pack containing 3xAAA fallen due to loose screw in
the jungle while on exercusion tour. Locally explored the market here
Lahore-Pakistan but without positive results.Even defective winder 600/610
can run the camera provided its supply system is in working order. Will
appreci
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 02:56:06 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're right, Shel. That is nice. I finally got to see it. I've come to
> ignore flickr images, because I have to append everything after the @ to see
> them. Can't just click on the url. And then they take forever
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:58:56 -0500, frank theriault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An alternate title I was thinking of was, "Please Completely Insert
> Your Quarter..."
>
> Foul language warning: If swear-words offend you, don't open this url:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/312
You're right, Shel. That is nice. I finally got to see it. I've come to ignore
flickr images, because I have to append everything after the @ to see them.
Can't just click on the url. And then they take forever to load.
But I digress. Great shot Frank. But don't you have a photo.net page?
Paul
Hi Frank,
The frame around the image isn't white. It matches some of the grey tones
in the image. The photo is supposed to be oppressive. Shooting heroin is
a very serious business. The print looks a lot better than this cheesy web
image ... the black is richer, the grey tones glow, the specul
Frank, that's great - just effin' great! Too bad that stupid flickr site
won't allow a bigger image, or, if it does, I've not figured out how to see
it. There are a few little things I could nit pick, but they are truly
mionr, and may really be of no consequence (or even exist) in the full
sized
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:25:19 -0500, David Chang-Sang
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.chang-sang.com/paw/
>
> It's with the EOS-3.. I'm hoping to have some film back from the lab this
> week that I can post next weeks PAW as a K1000 shot..
>
> Cheers
> Dave
>
Cool shot, Dave!
I have trie
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:04:17 +, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not everybody has the same experience of people injecting. I've seen
> people shooting up heroin, but never insulin, as far as I know. I have
> no idea whether or not it's different. Maybe it's different still for
> methadone
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:46:54 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks! You're the only person to comment on this pic, and probably one of
> the few to have seen it (based on web page stats).
>
> Lighting was from one small window located above and behind the scene. P
http://www.chang-sang.com/paw/
It's with the EOS-3.. I'm hoping to have some film back from the lab this
week that I can post next weeks PAW as a K1000 shot..
Cheers
Dave
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:55:12 -, Ryan Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only the ones with funny names and bunny ears!
Humph!
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
An alternate title I was thinking of was, "Please Completely Insert
Your Quarter..."
Foul language warning: If swear-words offend you, don't open this url:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3124455/
Comments are always welcome!
thanks,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."
Seeing as how I've owned and still own a number of "That Brand's" cameras ;)
I can say that the A series is solid.
If memory serves me correctly the A series just enough of a little manual
control to grow into while still offering the usual "consumer" modes that
make it easy to use.
I wanted some
You can purchase an adapter to mount a 67 lens on a Pentax 35mm k-mount camera.
But why would you want to? The 67 lenses are bigger and heavier, and they're
not optimized for the 35mm image circle.The results will be just okay, and the
penalties will be significant.
Paul
> G'day All.
> I have
G'day All.
I have interested in wether a Pentax 67 lens can be fitted to the ZX-L.
Does anyone know if it needs an adaptor? If so, where are they
available?
how will the camera handle? Manual focus? metering? etc etc
Thanks
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor
Australia
"Every normal man must be tempted at
The Canon A series seems to be a good value and offers decent pics. I've got
an A70, and my only complaint is the strong flash and laggy shutter release
(which affects all P&S AFAICT). A friend asked for advice on a digi P&S; he
was looking at the Canon S500. I pointed him in the direction of the
Hi,
Saturday, January 8, 2005, 10:46:14 PM, Shel wrote:
>
> It was just a couple of pics back that someone said titles and context are
> often a detriment.
That depends on the type of photograph and the use it's put to. Any
picture which purports to be journalism - and I'm not suggesting that
Graywolf wrote:
> Knowledgable types ignor all those words that are suposed to create a buying
> frenzy such as "Vintage", "Rare", and "Bargain".
You missed the biggest "stay away" flags of all: "minty" and "L@@K"!
I also refuse to bid on anything described as a "lense" on principle
alone!
;-)
-
#1 Bogen 3033 with 3047 head Good, used condition. $115
#2 Nikon FG with E 50/1.8 lens. Works perfectly, with case. Just a
modest ding on top. $85
#3 Old box of Kodaligh ortho film type 3, 16x20 (the big stuff!) dated
3/1991.
Originally a 100-sheet box. Count unknown. Will count f
You sure about that?
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: Test
Fibber
Cotty wrote:
On 8/1/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
To get rid of silly anti-virus signature.
It worked.
Cheers,
I agree in principle. But repair services have already quit servicing the LX.
Make a few calls to verify if you wish. I shoot with mine once in a while, but
it's becoming a museum piece. The *istD will undoubtedly follow, but not for at
least five years.
Paul
> Hi,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
A few weeks ago I asked for some digicam suggestions for my sister. This
morning she informed me that she bought a Canon Powershot A75 which some
people on the list suggested. So, thanks to all who offered suggestions,
especially to those who thought the A75 would be a worthwhile
consideration.
Fibber
Cotty wrote:
On 8/1/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
To get rid of silly anti-virus signature.
It worked.
Cheers,
Cotty
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 06/01/2005
___/\__
||
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be surprised if you'd be able to get either the *istD or the LX serviced in 10 years. In fact, it's difficult to get the LX serviced now. Independents won't touch it. It's too specialized. And I think Pentax is on the verge of abondoning it. Don't get me wront.
We're clean on the Mac here pal.
> On 8/1/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >To get rid of silly anti-virus signature.
>
> It worked.
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 26
On 8/1/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>To get rid of silly anti-virus signature.
It worked.
Cheers,
Cotty
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 06/01/2005
___/\__
|| (O) | Peopl
I would be surprised if you'd be able to get either the *istD or the LX
serviced in 10 years. In fact, it's difficult to get the LX serviced now.
Independents won't touch it. It's too specialized. And I think Pentax is on the
verge of abondoning it. Don't get me wront. I love my LX, and I will d
Great shot. It's quite obvious what's going on here. Even if one doesn't know
how heroin is injected, the mood of the photo makes it obvious that this is not
a good thing. Good work, Shel.
Paul
>
>
> It was just a couple of pics back that someone said titles and context are
> often a detrimen
Hmmm, posted the wrong url for the 100% crop. It's here:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3020337&size=lg
> I've owned this lens for a long time but only used it once in anger. It's
> just
> been sitting. But there's been a lot of talk about it here lately, so I took
> it
> out tod
It was just a couple of pics back that someone said titles and context are
often a detriment.
I think the pic makes it pretty clear as to what's going on, but then, I've
seen lots of people shooting heroin and injecting insulin, as well as
shooting up lots of other injectables, so I'd not confus
To get rid of silly anti-virus signature.
There are four hands, in a rather normal, or at least, not unusual,
position for shooting heroin.
Shel
> From: mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I find it rather odd. There seem to be three hands.. If the one on
> the left side was not there it would be a much stronger image, although
I've owned this lens for a long time but only used it once in anger. It's just
been sitting. But there's been a lot of talk about it here lately, so I took it
out today and shot the goose. I shoot the goose when I want to see how a lens
performs. I didn't get real serious about this. Just handhe
Hi,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Dave,
Thanks! You're the only person to comment on this pic, and probably one of
the few to have seen it (based on web page stats).
Lighting was from one small window located above and behind the scene. Pic
made with a banged up old Spottie and a yellowed Super Tak 5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/8/2005 10:26:24 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I'd remove "VINTAGE" from that group --
it just means (or should)
(1) it is old and seller isn't sure of precise dates or ..
(2) ebay has not seen fit to supply date breakdowns in
Hi,
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Joseph Tainter"
Subject: Re: *istD EOL...
"What I was told is that there are less than 1000 bodies left in
factory inventory, and when they're gone there'll be no more made"
Hmmm. I wonder how long there will be parts for repairs? I
> Of course I leave the batteries in the camera for multiple
> shoots. Lithium AAs will reliably deliver at least 2000
> exposures when used with the battery grips. Of course I never
> travel without a spare set,
Same here. The last time I left the house without backup batteries, I ran
out of
Hi,
> I was rivited to it as soon as i opened it Shel. :-)
> Fantastic image. Speaks volumes.
> Great lighting and framing.
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/shooting.html
> >
> > Some years ago this little pic made it into a booklet on the subject
...
It's a good picture, and very inte
Thanks, Dave.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 8. januar 2005 16:48
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: PESO: Eight O' Clock Flower
Hi Dave,
Thanks! You're the only person to comment on this pic, and probably one of
the few to have seen it (based on web page stats).
Lighting was from one small window located above and behind the scene. Pic
made with a banged up old Spottie and a yellowed Super Tak 50/1.4, should
anyone care
On 8/1/05, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Well here it is, what you've all been waiting for. My first PESO taken
>with the *ist-D. It's not the most
>inspired photograph I've ever taken. But I've been screwing around with
>this thing for a few day's now
>and I've begun to get t
not if you download the Mac version.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 2:32 PM
Subject: RE: IstD PS plugin question
> I have downloaded this file and unzipped it. It's called: PENTAX RAW
> Plugin.sea
> What do I do
Paul, do you know if Mr. Miles is the singer for one of the current
Greenfield Village TV Ads? From what I can make out from the ad, it looks
like him.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: An Oxymoro
Of course I leave the batteries in the camera for multiple shoots. Lithium AAs
will reliably deliver at least 2000 exposures when used with the battery grips.
Of course I never travel without a spare set, and I have two bodies. I've had
too many bad experiences with rechargable reliability. Lith
Thanks Dave. I am going to work on the background, and I'll do a BW conversion
as well before sending them all to Mr. Miles. I have probably a couple dozen
shots he's never seen, and while I don't ask for anything in return, I enjoy it
when I see one on one of his posters or CDs. I'm guessing th
11 degrees celsius and very stormy in northern Germany, April-weather
Looks nice, white landscape in winter.
Best, Bernd
Powell Hargrave
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:47:28 -0800
It got a bit white here today.
http://members.shaw.ca/hargravep/Image1.htm
Powell
I don't doubt that for a minute.
The internal compartment arrangement of this back pack eliminates the
possibility of imposing a force on the body/lens during normal transporting.
Now if it gets run over by a car
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/1/05, Jeff Tokayer, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I'm telling you Dave, the E-1 is the one you need to replace both the
>D2H & *istD.
A genuine comedian!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I don't have any pictures of Robert Johnson lookin' that happy.
Good shot Paul. If it was in B&W the background might not be so bad.
Then again i like to shoot the blues in B&W.That film was made for the
blues.Then again
the band
i shoot wants colour all the time,but i sneak in a roll once in aw
CUTE!
I have actually found that the back of a legal pad works pretty good with
optical mice, BTW.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 8/1/05, David Mann,
Thats quite the set up.
Now that i believe would be a tad hard to hand hold for a 6x7.LOL
Dave
> Experimenting with scanner calibration I
stumbled across the following
> Kodachrome from 1986. Me and one of my 67s with the 400/4, 2X TC and Helicoid
> tubes, t
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
