On Feb 4, 2005, at 1:12 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
PS: Fisheye contact lenses. Now ~there's~ an idea... LOL
I'm gonna patent it!
It'd be cheaper and easier to just get drunk. That'd also solve the
problem of getting out-of-focus fisheye images.
Stereoscopic, too.
I wonder if you could patent
On Feb 4, 2005, at 1:41 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
so far as i am concerned, there are a handful of useful editing
programs that do color management right for a photographer: Photoshop,
Photoshop Elements, PhotoPaint, and Picture Window Pro. the programs
included with cameras generally do it right
On Feb 4, 2005, at 11:50 AM, Tom C wrote:
Appearances are deceiving, if he had fallen, there was a nice ledge
four or five feet under, that would have caught him.
I hate to go OT but a guy was rescued off NZ's tallest mountain the
other day. He slipped while climbing near the summit and fell
On Feb 4, 2005, at 2:18 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
You don't have to however if the image is mapped to Adobe RGB colour
space and
you open it as if it were sRGB mapping the colours will be slightly
desaturated
and slightly the wrong hues and the image will lack contrast.
If using Photoshop you can
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've already written too much.
Does that mean you have to kill all of us? If there's a choice of methodology,
I'd like to try a surfeit of Lampreys, please.
mike
-
Email provided by http://www.ntlhome.com/
On Feb 4, 2005, at 1:31 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Neither sRGB or Adobe RGB are really good matches for ink print
processes
however true colour photographic processes are pretty close in gamut
to sRGB.
To expand on this point a bit, ink processes are CMYK (a subtractive
process) while you might
OK, I have an *IstD as well ...
Regards, JvW
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:38:44 -, Nick Clark wrote:
Oh alright then, I've got a D.
Nick.
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02/02/05 20:05:11
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.netpentax-discuss@pdml.net
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/02/04 Fri AM 06:24:42 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Still Standing
Went out to farm country today. Done it before, took picture of barn one time
while there. Taken pictures of trees, hills, farmhouse, horses, etc. Today I
went a bit
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/02/03 Thu PM 11:15:49 GMT
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: OT - For 20 Quid...
... I got the Fujica ST605n with Fujinon 55mm f/2.2 today, and as a
surprise bonus, the seller included a Fujinon 35mm f/2.8 !
It's all immaculate
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/02/03 Thu PM 11:15:58 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: RE: PESO - Another Concert Shot
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:56:18 -0500, John Francis wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:23:05AM +, [EMAIL
Nice pictures!
Michael
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Rolling Red [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2005 19:32
An: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Betreff: Re: PESO: Pentax girl
Thanks for the intro, Juan :)
I'd like to post a few pics I took while holding that brand
Sorry, Why do you take the logo? I didn't understand your explanation.
Michael
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Februar 2005 01:33
An: pentax list
Betreff: Re: PESO: Pentax girl
On 3/2/05, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
David,
If I remember correctly, I think you're working on a Mac. Is there any
drawback to printing with the ColorSynch workflow? I've been getting
excellent results that way. I use the Apple Cinema Display and print to
an Epson 2200 with PS CS on a G4 with 10.3.7. I select colorsynch
workflow
Dave,
This is very interesting stuff. Like Mike, I would rather you didn't
limit your explanations for fear of saying too much. We can take it!
I've always used Adobe up 'til now, but will switch to SRGB. 99% of my
pictures never go near a print; they are only ever seen on a screen.
On 4 Feb 2005 at 22:49, David Mann wrote:
If using Photoshop you can set it up to ask you what to do if the
tagged colour space does not match your default working space when
loading a file. You can either use the tagged space, convert to the
working space, or choose not to colour manage
On 4 Feb 2005 at 23:16, David Mann wrote:
As an experiment you can try opening a file that was captured as Adobe
RGB, then set up Photoshop to soft-proof with the sRGB profile as the
output device. Then turn on the gamut warning feature. That will tell
you whether or not your Adobe file
I'm currently taking a second semester of BW photography at the local
community college. They are currently filling about six classes a
semester for Photo I, and my instructor says my Photo II class is the
biggest he's taught (he's been
On 4 Feb 2005 at 7:17, Boris Liberman wrote:
http://webaperture.com/gallery/photos/42431
No comments. Only notice that this was shot at 1600 ISO. I must say
that 100% magnification of original image looks rather disappointing.
I should print it and see how it prints.
Hi Boris,
The image
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 21:47:05 +1300, David Mann wrote:
I wonder if you could patent getting drunk as a process for
improving photographic vision...
If Amazon.com can patent one click shopping then surely you ought to
be able to patent getting drunk as a process, much less one for
improving
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 9:05:09 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct. Both players are actually playing. Quite well, too!
http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/FourHands.jpg
If you look closely, you can see the back player's nose growing out
of the left side of the front player's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided to take the darkroom class again this winter,to break up
the week and
to
Glenn then said:
I'm currently taking a second semester of BW photography at the local
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/02/04 Fri PM 01:20:01 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: RE: PESO - Another Concert Shot
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 9:05:09 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct. Both players are actually playing.
Well folks I've just made a new friend, and have spent the last few
hours making introductions.
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/Friends.htm
I now understand why so may people love the LX. I can't wait to put
some film through this baby. I know it's bucking the trend somewhat,
but I suspect
Powerful shot, Shel. Great expression. Nice job!
Best,
Stephen Moore
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/nflguy2.html
I brought up the Ilford price increases here a few weeks back and that
started a bit of a What's going on with Ilford? thing because Mark
Roberts had been having problems getting some of the film (iirc).
I don't think film is dying or dead for that matter - just that less people
are using film
Hi!
The image looks OK in the small format as you have presented, it might have
benefited from being just a little darker overall as the intensity of the
lights signifies that the sky is likely a little too bright. I assume that you
aren't post processing using PC CS RAW as yet? Why I ask is
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 21:47:05 +1300, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. That'd also solve the
problem of getting out-of-focus fisheye images.
Out-of-focus is a problem?
always curious,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:35:56 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been doing a lot of scanning the past two days as I dug out some negs
from an overlooked batch in storage, so there may be a few more pics than
usual appearing here.
I met this guy in Berkeley and we sat and
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:40:10 -0800, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to compensate a little bit...
http://photos4.flickr.com/4191624_c63f1f23b3_o.jpg
Complete with ist DS, sporting M50 1.4 and black tape...
:-)
[istD, FA35/2--lighting was all kinds of strange colors]
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:31:50 -0800, Rolling Red [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the intro, Juan :)
I'd like to post a few pics I took while holding that brand new Penatx *ist
Ds.
I'd appreciate feedback:
http://neisthai.blogspot.com/2005/01/night-out.html
Btw, I just joined pdml. It
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:54:12 -0600, Robert Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to add to the compensation:
Another Pentax girl, found on photo.net
WARNING WARNING WARNING NUDITY!!!
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2469966
WARNING WARNING WARNING NUDITY!!!
Hey, nice
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:06:57 +0100, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I guess Leica users do this to minimize the risk of getting the camera
stolen.
We had a minor flame war about this several months ago, IIRC, but:
I think the whole tape up your camera (particularly, but not always
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:40:10 -0800, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to compensate a little bit...
http://photos4.flickr.com/4191624_c63f1f23b3_o.jpg
Complete with ist DS, sporting M50 1.4 and black tape...
:-)
[istD, FA35/2--lighting was all kinds of strange
Well folks I've just made a new friend, and have spent the last few
hours making introductions.
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/Friends.htm
I now understand why so may people love the LX. I can't wait to put
some film through this baby. I know it's bucking the trend somewhat,
but I suspect
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:13:53 -0800, Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I dropped by a local waterfall today and was experimenting with the long
exposure setting on my family's new digital ps. It goes down to 4sec,
which is 3sec longer than my SLR (one of my main gripes about the P3n), but
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:07:09 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sadly, I don't think I can be brutal. I don't know why, but I'm
always a sucker for the long exposure to make the moving water look
cool shots. I know they're cliche, but I like 'em.
Beyond that, I like the
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 06:45:37 -0800, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You find that pretentious? I see the LOL but... don't you mean it?
How about, when held against her chest, in a venue that's as dim as
she's in, and against her chosen clothing, the camera almost disappears?
It
Apologies if that has been mentioned already - cannot keep up with the
list at the moment!
UKTV History channel Saturday 5th February 19:00 to 00:00
Decisive Moments: the Photographs That Made History
Pictures! Pictures! Pictures!
Series focusing on the celebrated images captured in the 20th
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 23:40:42 +1000, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4 Feb 2005 at 7:17, Boris Liberman wrote:
http://webaperture.com/gallery/photos/42431
No comments. Only notice that this was shot at 1600 ISO. I must say
that 100% magnification of original image looks rather
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:46:42 +0800, David S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well folks I've just made a new friend, and have spent the last few
hours making introductions.
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/Friends.htm
I now understand why so may people love the LX. I can't wait to put
some
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:42:06 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This doesn't appear to have made it to the list. Sent it last night and
this morning. One more try
A while back I discovered a frame on a roll of Tri-X that I could not
account for. There was no recollection of
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:25:52 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Went out to farm country today. Done it before, took picture of barn one time
while there. Taken pictures of trees, hills, farmhouse, horses, etc. Today I
went a bit too late, too many shadows and the shadows
Marnie,
I love it! The shot takes risks by combining two
cliches (overhanging branch and
line-through-the-field), and goes way beyond them.
The detail in the tree bark creates tension that is
balanced by the relaxed gentleness of the fields and
hill. Beautiful.
Did you use fill flash to bring
In a message dated 2/3/2005 11:36:18 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A perfect shot from a very nice place! Great DOF. Do you use HFD charts?
All the best
Jens Bladt
No. But I sort of know it. Learned it sort of in photography class. Sort of
remember it. It's
Actually I think the shadows make the picture. To me any photo that makes me
look twice is a great picture. First look said, The lighting does not match
that shadow of a big tree. Second look said, Ahh, the ditch and those little
trees. Two pats on the back for this one, Marnie.
graywolf
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:21:30 -0700, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since fisheyes are all the rage right now :) ...
Taken outside entrance to Grand Canyon NP...
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2825551
And another that will make you scroll (Frank), but I don't want to resize
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 06:45:37 -0800, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You find that pretentious? I see the LOL but... don't you mean it?
How about, when held against her chest, in a venue that's as dim as
she's in, and against her chosen clothing, the camera almost
No, Frank, a black 77 looks perfect on the LX. OTOH, a chrome 77 would look
perfect on your MX. So you have to buy two. A black one for your LX, and a
chrome one for your MX. GRIN!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
frank
MEGA Photography TV Night tomorrow (UK only).
Hmmm... If it's UK only, then how could it really be MEGA?
[Just kidding, you, Rob - g.]
Fred [from the Colonies across the pond]
In a message dated 2/4/2005 7:36:08 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/farm2.htm
Comments welcome, naturally.
I like it a lot.
The way the old tree frames the hill, the way the fence-line bisects
the hill, the little orchard on
Since I just mentioned on another thread that I'm going to spend the
weekend with my kids in Kingston, Ontario, I'll also tell you what we
have planned.
Tomorrow we head up to Ottawa (our nation's capital, about 2 hours
north of Kingston) for a day of skating on the Rideau Canal, the
world's
In a message dated 2/4/2005 7:37:36 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie,
I love it! The shot takes risks by combining two
cliches (overhanging branch and
line-through-the-field), and goes way beyond them.
The detail in the tree bark creates tension that is
balanced by
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 10:45:05 -0500, Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, Frank, a black 77 looks perfect on the LX. OTOH, a chrome 77 would look
perfect on your MX. So you have to buy two. A black one for your LX, and a
chrome one for your MX. GRIN!
Sorry, Thomas, but I must respectfully
frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:42:06 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This doesn't appear to have made it to the list. Sent it last night and
this morning. One more try
A while back I discovered a frame on a roll of Tri-X that I could not
account for. There was
frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:54:12 -0600, Robert Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to add to the compensation:
Another Pentax girl, found on photo.net
WARNING WARNING WARNING NUDITY!!!
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2469966
WARNING WARNING WARNING NUDITY!!!
In a message dated 2/4/2005 7:58:00 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually I think the shadows make the picture. To me any photo that makes me
look twice is a great picture. First look said, The lighting does not match
that shadow of a big tree. Second look said, Ahh, the
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:21:17 -, Rob Brigham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip In this edition, the golden age of celebrity photography, in which
photographers such as Yousuf Karsh, Dennis Stock and Sam Shaw reveal how
they secured the cooperation of subjects including James Dean, Marilyn
Monroe
I hate you.
Not only do you have an LX, but you have 2 of the 3
Limited lenses I so greatly desire. (31, 43, 77).
I've got an LX, I just need to find someone willing to
part with the 3 Limited lenses for cheap. :) I only
got the LX cause by some freak chance it went cheap
enough for me to
Hi All,
I have for sale:
SMCP-FA 28-105mm f/3.2-4.5 AL IF Autofocus Lens
complete with hood original caps. Excellent
condition.
$150 plus shipping
Sigma 70-300 f4-5.6 APO MACRO Super with hood. Good
condition. Zoom feels a little stiff compared to some
others I own.
$100 plus shipping
On 4/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
We are all very happy for you. Now, you have to go to a shop (Jessop's
is a good one) and ask the nice boy behind the counter for something
called film. He might have difficulty understanding you.
Film? Oh yeah that stuff. I have a
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:28:19 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. Love it!
Thank you, Frank!
The lighting (both the colour and direction from which it comes) is
amazing. Like the tilt. Like the way she seems oblivious to the fact
she's being photographed (she
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 21:47:05 +1300, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. That'd also solve the
problem of getting out-of-focus fisheye images.
Out-of-focus is a problem?
always curious,
frank
Not for you...
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:43:16 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[on black tape]
I'm guessing that now people do it for all sorts of reasons, from a
desire to be stealthy, to a no-logo anti-corportate sentiment, to
simply being pretentious (see me? I'm like HCB!).
All three, for
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:25:52 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/farm2.htm
Other people have stated why this picture is good better than I could,
but just wanted to say I like it too. I don't usually care too much
for pictures
Hmmm...It's about NOT foucsing at infinity if you want maximum DOF.
H=F2/Fc
H: HFD
F2 = FxF: Focal length (Focal length X Focal length)
fc = f-stop x Circle of Confusion (CoC) on the neg/CCD
You can download DOFmaster Hyper focal Chart (software) at:
www.dofmaster.com
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:15:49 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... I got the Fujica ST605n with Fujinon 55mm f/2.2 today, and as a
surprise bonus, the seller included a Fujinon 35mm f/2.8 !
It's all immaculate and beautiful. Size, wise, smaller than I recall (had
one when I was 19) - and
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:56:01 +0100 (CET), Anton Browne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find it quite good for portraits, the only thing is you have to shout
directions at your model. The slight awkwardness of the manual diaphragm
isn't an issue as you can leave it wide open.
Cornelius
Henk Terhell wrote:
Denali at midnight: very good. This really should be seen from the slide
projector for all the details.
Hank, thank you
But actually, it needs to be seen in real life for _all_ the details :)
I got very lazy, too, and didnt re scan this from the original slide.
It
For sale:
Pentax SFXn, EX+ condition. (Same exact camera as the SF1n). Includes
the SMC-F 28-80mm f/3.5-4.5 zoom -- not the Pentax-F or Takumar-F
cheaper zooms that often came with the SF bodies.
Camera is in perfect working condition -- definitely a low-mileage
body with minimal signs of use
Hey, Frank Have a GREAT weekend. You seem so excited I'm sure
it's gonna be a super time. What's the difference between a toboggan and a
sled?
Shel
From: frank theriault
Since I just mentioned on another thread that I'm going to spend the
weekend with my kids in Kingston,
She's looking at the first pic and it scared the crap outta her LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank theriault
I'm sure I'm way off base with this, but the lady reminds me of an
Eastern European peasant or villager. She looks quite frightened
wendy beard wrote:
Hi All,
I have for sale:
SMCP-FA 28-105mm f/3.2-4.5 AL IF Autofocus Lens
complete with hood original caps. Excellent
condition.
$150 plus shipping
Is this the good version of this lens? I know there were several versions.
Thanks,
rg
Sigma 70-300 f4-5.6 APO MACRO Super with
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:58:38 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I brought up the Ilford price increases here a few weeks back and that
started a bit of a What's going on with Ilford? thing because Mark
Roberts had been having problems getting some of the film (iirc).
I don't
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hey, Frank Have a GREAT weekend. You seem so excited I'm sure
it's gonna be a super time. What's the difference between a toboggan and a
sled?
Shel
A sled has two steel runners, to run on packed snow or ice.
A toboggan is flat on the bottom, made of long wood
Herb,
For some reason, the PEF files you uploaded doesn't load correctly in
PhaseOne C1 RAW. The lower 15% of the image is just black. Never seen
this with my own PEFs... Any ideas?
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent:
Hi, Jeff and Jeff. I'm touched that you missed me. But for the past few months
there has been nothing to complain about!
Thanks for the help and for Mail-Archive.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Breidenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Feb 3, 2005 8:14 PM
To: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A sled can be steered, a tobaggon is un-steerable. (Yes, I know you're
supposed to lean but I say it's un-steerable).
Keith Whaley wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hey, Frank Have a GREAT weekend. You seem so excited I'm sure
it's gonna be a super time. What's the difference between a
Thanks for the details, Keith. I kinda sorta thought that might have been
the diff, but in NYC where I grew up we only had sleds, and the only
toboggans I saw were pictures illustrating stories from the early 20th and
19th centuries. I just thought they were old fashioned sleds.
Speaking of
Does anyone have an emailable/downloadable copy of the original software
anywhere easy?
I do have mine but I will have to wade through piles of junk in the loft
to find it - I didn't install it when I replaced my PC because it was so
poor compared to Photoshop CS, but I want to have a look at the
If you consider your K1000 takes to much space... ;)
Thibouille
I hate you.
Not only do you have an LX, but you have 2 of the 3
Limited lenses I so greatly desire. (31, 43, 77).
I've got an LX, I just need to find someone willing to
part with the 3 Limited
Thanks for the feedback Frank, et al. Be looking forward to seeing your
prints.
Tom C.
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Fisheye Desert Vistas
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:41:51 -0500
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005
Have a great time Frank. Looks like it should be a beautiful weekend,
with temperatures around plus 4C. Think I'll head for the beach myself
VGB.
Speaking of weather this was posted on the UW bulletin website this
morning
It was a month of extremes in temperature at the University
of
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomorrow we head up to Ottawa (our nation's capital,
about 2 hours
north of Kingston) for a day of skating on the
Rideau Canal, the
world's longest skating rink (so they say, although
Hans Brinker may
have something to say about that...).
Your photograph doesn't show any EXIF info.
But according to the DOF master a 35mm lens on a APS size senser should give
you sharpness at infinity at F 8 if the distance is set to app. 6.2 meter/20
feet. This way you'll get maximum sharpness in the foreground (like yours)
and still sharp at
JF I've always used Adobe up 'til now, but will switch to SRGB. 99% of my
JF pictures never go near a print; they are only ever seen on a screen.
Even for onscreen, you should consider not abanding AdobeRGB. I have
found that for many photos with more coloured or mixed lighting, the
sRGB had
--- Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wendy beard wrote:
Hi All,
I have for sale:
SMCP-FA 28-105mm f/3.2-4.5 AL IF Autofocus Lens
complete with hood original caps. Excellent
condition.
$150 plus shipping
Is this the good version of this lens? I know there
were several
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Went out to farm country today. Done it before, took picture of barn one
time
while there. Taken pictures of trees, hills, farmhouse, horses, etc. Today
I
went a bit too late, too many shadows and the shadows got deeper by the
time I
was done
I don't know if the
Tks! The guy was very photographable ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Stephen Moore
Powerful shot, Shel. Great expression. Nice job!
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/nflguy2.html
Last night I found a roll of Kodak RG25 in the back of the fridge. It's
about three years out of date, iirc. What sort of results can be expected
from this film? Fogged? Color shift? Other things? Do I need to tell
the lab anything to adjust development?
Shel
I'm looking for an 8X to 10x loupe for 35mm viewing. Is there anything out
there that can be recommended?
Also, since I'm now the owner of a 6x6 format camera, which loupes can be
recommended? Anything that'll cover the entire neg and give about a 4x -
5x magnification?
Shel
They'll probably be fine, perhaps a little underexposed. Rate it perhaps a
little lower.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 4. februar 2005 19:38
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne:
It should be fine if it was in the fridge. If not, there's really nothing you
can do to correct it. Just shoot it normal. Of course you wouldn't use it for
anything critical. When I've had problems with outdated film, it's been color
shift. But I suppose anything is possible.
Paul
Last night
I didn't answer the survey, too. Writing mails isn't that comfortable and
quick for me, because I am on the digest-list and most of the time I prefer
looking across the archive. But maybe it's no excuse (wearing sackclothes
and ashes ...)
I have got a *istDs body three weeks ago and I am quite
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Last night I found a roll of Kodak RG25 in the back of the fridge. It's
about three years out of date, iirc. What sort of results can be expected
from this film? Fogged? Color shift? Other things? Do I need to tell
the lab anything to adjust development?
Shel
Is it
In the 4X range, I have one of these that I am very
happy with:
http://scientificsonline.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_3037701
Great field of view, great eye relief, no distortion,
no color fringing, and great for the money. The Pentax
5.5X is very nice, but twice the cost.
In the 10X range, I have a
The way color film ages is from a greenish cast to magenta. If it's
been in the fridge all this time the aging
process has been retarded, but it will still have a magenta cast of some
kind. It may also be a bit fogged.
If this a professional film then it will be a bit more magenta than an
Got back my first roll of colour just now. From the corner grocery
minilab, so you know what to expect. Still, some fun shots.
The one of the porch is my front porch, during our biggest snowfall of
the winter.
The others were taken in Kingston, Ontario on my previous visit with
the kids. I
How wonderfully English
Tom C.
I hate to go OT but a guy was rescued off NZ's tallest mountain the other
day. He slipped while climbing near the summit and fell about 5 metres.
If his foot hadn't caught in some rocks on a small ledge he'd have fallen
1500m further.
He set off his
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:14:28 -0500 (EST), wendy beard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't forget that it's also the beginning of
Winterlude, so bring loads and loads of film for the
ice sculptures and stuff!
Wendy
Thanks for the heads-up, Wendy. I'd say let's get together and snap
some
What else you got growin' back in there Shel? I'd like to see a picture of
what was in front of the roll of film. :) In color.
Tom C.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Out Dated Color Neg
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
