What's RTF?
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Rob Studdert
As for the RTF it's a waste of space on my camera,
it seems to work but I'm never the one
Sorry, but what this really means is Pentax is doomed.
I hear you loud and clear Mark.
Do you know where I can unload my Pentax gear?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Nirvana!
M.A. Galloway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow!
(R)e(T)ractable (F)lash.
The pop-up thingy on top. ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 4:07 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Another firm believe shattered
What's RTF?
Shel
You meet the nicest
I'm offering a sanitary Pentax gear disposal service,
for a nominal fee of course. ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 4:13 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Nirvana!
Sorry, but what this really means
I had my first one replaced in January 2004, for this exact same fault.
Repair agents, here in NZ, had it for about two months trying to fix it, but
gave up in the end and sent me a new one.
Max
Reading about Don's problems with his *istD and built-in flash has
prompted me to write.
My *istD
Cotty is civilized?
I'm either terribly disappointed in Cotty, or totally bummed that
civilization hasn't worked out.
Godfrey
obligatory smiley added
On Oct 30, 2005, at 1:55 PM, John Forbes wrote:
... However, Frank was making the point that he wished the whingers
would follow your
On 30/10/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
On the other hand, I was on the tube yesterday sat next to some sad iGit
reading a magazine about Mac computers. The magazine seemed to be all about
how everything to do with Macs was unbearably iCool. It included an article
which appeared to be
Congratulations Scott.
http://twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=226
Who's that big ugly bloke with your wife??
;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
1) The instant review *is* representative of the data you
captured ... the JPEG processing is consistent and shifts from what
the RAW file is by a consistent amount, so you can use it as a guide
to what your actual exposure is. The hotspot blinkies are, to me, the
most telling and useful
On Oct 30, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
I try to keep photos of my own kids to a minimum, but this one's brand
new. Molly joined us very early Saturday morning. Meet Molly:
http://twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=225
Congratulations, Scott!
Godfrey
I guess then that a camera with a flash that does not pop up has a
Tractable Flash?
What a dumb acronym.
thanks
Godfrey
On Oct 30, 2005, at 2:25 PM, Don Sanderson wrote:
(R)e(T)ractable (F)lash.
The pop-up thingy on top. ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff
Rob Studdert wrote:
Another pic from my trip. Bad bad Rob, I forgot that the camera was in manual
exposure mode and in a rush shot off five frames which were at least a stop
and a half too hot. What this tends to do apart from the obvious is turn the
sky a very icky turquoise colour, so
On 30/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
The whingeing Frank is talking about concerns Pentax bodies. As you
bought a Canon DSLR, you have surely in that sense defected.
However, Frank was making the point that he wished the whingers would
follow your example, buy a body that
On 30/10/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty is civilized?
Bolshit.
I'm either terribly disappointed in Cotty, or totally bummed that
civilization hasn't worked out.
I like to think that civilisation is a good idea. It's just that it
wasn't *my* idea.
Cheers,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Rob ...
BW seems like a good way to present this photo. Good choice. The subject
and location looks like it would offer a lot of possibilities, although I'm
not sure that you caught the best possibility with this shot. However,
the problem here is that the
On 30/10/05, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have this problem, too --
my monitor is set at 1024 x 768 - I can't make it
any finer than that
My monitors are 1024X768 as well. What I do on a Mac is drag the pic
straight from the web browser window and drop it onto the desktop. Then I
On Oct 30, 2005, at 17:05, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I have this problem, too --
my monitor is set at 1024 x 768 - I can't make it
any finer than that for
a number of reasons having to do with my
eyesight. I used to have it at 800 x 640,
but I was missing tons of stuff that way.
Both Internet
Hello Dave,
I like the shot but your tonal rendering is off the mark. I made an
adjustment as example. It might not be what you want to see in this
photo, but consider it as an example of how to get started.
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/DB/
Godfrey
On Oct 30, 2005, at 7:50 AM, [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller
Subject: Re: Nirvana!
Sorry, but what this really means is Pentax is doomed.
I hear you loud and clear Mark.
Do you know where I can unload my Pentax gear?
If yer dunping it, I'll take your 600.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
How does the
photographer who doesn't have access to this information improve his or
her
photography by relying on what may be considered misinformation without
someone explaining the
All this talk of panos got me trying some myself.
The program is pretty simple to use.
Here's what it gave me 1st try... (380Kb)
members.aol.com/rfsindg/marmo.jpg
Here's a 2nd try to develop greater resolution...(3762Kb)
members.aol.com/rfsindg/curve.jpg
Some strange things happening
Congratulations Scott!
Trust mother and baby are both doing well?
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 6:03 AM
Subject: PESO -- Brand New Molly
I try to keep photos of my
On 30 Oct 2005 at 17:58, Bob Sullivan wrote:
All this talk of panos got me trying some myself.
The program is pretty simple to use.
Here's what it gave me 1st try... (380Kb)
members.aol.com/rfsindg/marmo.jpg
Here's a 2nd try to develop greater resolution...(3762Kb)
Thanks Godfrey
That looks better.I used the Channel Converter,set the %'s to 25-75-5 as per
your starting
points. Then i masked the sky
and darkened it.I then masked the building and grass and did a curves adj
layer(keep in
mind i usually dont use layers
and this is quite new to me)
I then
I agree. I'm just starting to work with layers and i'm in a coinfused state
right now.(as
if that needed an
expanationvbg)
Help is appreciated
Dave
Looks to me that it could use a bit more
contrast.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
The smiles on their faces shows that the joy of sharing the captured
moment is indeed worth something. This is one place that digital has
really been wonderful. My own children have interest in the pictures
I take, because they can see them right after taking them. When doing
film, they took no
Hi group
I'll be talking to the service guy who upgraded my PC Monday, but i thought i'd
run this
by to see if i can get a start to the
problem.
PC went in for parisite removal,bigger HD and a DVD writer. Everythibng was
going well, i
was able to access my internet etc
until this morning. I
On 10/29/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/10/05, Frank, discombobulated, unleashed:
Pardon me Frank, but I still own and use Pentax photographic equipment. I
don't consider myself a defector.
first of all, i have no problems with defectors. it's whiners i have
a problem with.
On 10/30/05, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty,
The whingeing Frank is talking about concerns Pentax bodies. As you
bought a Canon DSLR, you have surely in that sense defected.
However, Frank was making the point that he wished the whingers would
follow your example, buy a body
You'd have to right click on the pic. and save it to the desktop but it
would work about the same way.
Cotty wrote:
On 30/10/05, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have this problem, too --
my monitor is set at 1024 x 768 - I can't make it
any finer than that
My monitors
Unless there's something horribly wrong with an image I don't use
layers. In photoshop I convert to bw by first optimizing the color
image as much as I can. Then I use this method.
1. Create a new adjustment layer Hue/Saturation
2a. Set Hue to -180
2b. Set Saturation to +100
2c. Set
There's never been a shortage of grumpy old men.
TR
The perception of the deterioration of life and things as they were
has been noted in the writings of men since the ancient Greeks, that
is, since the dawn of written history. I think I mentioned that once
before.
On 10/29/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'd been meaning to ask how the injuries were healing. Not fast enough,
I gather?
well, the nerve that runs behind the collarbone out to the arm seems
to be pinched or pressured, so my hand is numb, has shooting pains,
itches, burns, and
At least you've retained your sense of humor.
frank theriault wrote:
On 10/29/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'd been meaning to ask how the injuries were healing. Not fast enough,
I gather?
well, the nerve that runs behind the collarbone out to the arm seems
to be
All pentax auto focus cameras will do this, I think. Mount a manual focus
lens, focus on a point in space that a moving object will pass through,
(can't be moving too fast however, no 90 mph fast balls here), hold the
shutter release down. The camera will fire when the object moves the
She's beautiful and her big sister is adorable, too! Congratulations!
Heidi
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 12:03 PM
Subject: PESO -- Brand New Molly
I try to keep photos of my own kids to a
Sorry, but what this really means is Pentax is doomed.
I hear you loud and clear Mark.
Do you know where I can unload my Pentax gear?
Kenneth Waller
Ken,
I'm really sorry to tell you this. You waited too long. Your stuss is all
worthless now but I'll do something really foolish and
i thought it looked pretty cool when i took it. now i'm not so sure.
still, here it is for your consideration:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3839932
comments are always welcome.
tanx,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Nirvana!
Ken,
I'm really sorry to tell you this. You waited too long. Your stuss is all
worthless now but I'll do something really foolish and give you a couple
hundred bucks for your 600/4. Please don't tell anyone I'm
Thanks Bruce. My on-year-old grand daughter is fascinated by her image,
both on the lcd screen and on paper. The downstairs hall of my house is
lined with 8x10s of her mother, aunts and uncle from when they were
toddlers. My grand daughter always points to them, and we've been
teaching her who
I got roped into buying a calender page for my kennel club.
Here is what I have to offer.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/IMGP9675.html
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/IMGP9676.html
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/IMGP9677.html
Enjoyed it. Quite amazing. She seems to be saying something that wants me
sit up, take notice and listen. Would love to see her brother too, if you shot
him too and both of them together. You indeed are gifted.
Gaurav
On 10/29/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was taken yesterday
Quoting William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I got roped into buying a calender page for my kennel club.
Here is what I have to offer.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/IMGP9675.html
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/IMGP9676.html
Great picture. Caught the right mood and composed just right. And
choice of colors
is best because colors actually would probably lost the focus on the
mood, moment
and expression. Thanks for sharing.
Gaurav
On 10/29/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The title says it all.
You're missing out on a lot of capability.
1) You first have to define what optimizing the color image means
in the context of producing a grayscale rendering. An optimized
rendering for color presentation is not necessarily the best way to
prep for producing a grayscale rendering.
2)
On 31 Oct 2005 at 10:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vote for 9677. Expressions on the faces are entertaining.
I have them all up in front of me too, 9677 is the one that really shows the
three connected.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL
Hi Bob ...
I looked at the small pic - big one's to large to DL on my little wind-up
connection - and liked it quite a bit. It certainly appears to be a good,
if not great, first attempt.
Colors are great!
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Bob
I don't quite know what to make of this. It's got a nice tonal range,
well focused, somewhat interesting composition, but, there's just
something missing.
frank theriault wrote:
i thought it looked pretty cool when i took it. now i'm not so sure.
still, here it is for your consideration:
I vote for 9677. Expressions on the faces are entertaining.
I have them all up in front of me too, 9677 is the one that really shows
the three connected.
--
Bill, I recommend the first one, 9675. I think that in 9677, the left
Chihuahua looks frightened.
Joe
9677 is the most interesting 9678 a close second. Got any pix of cats?
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: William Robb
I got roped into buying a calender page for my kennel club.
Here is what I have to offer.
I placed my bid and just won an F* 600 F4:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemssPageName=ADME:B:EOIBSAA:US:11Item=7556939330
I never thought I'd own one. Wow. But my heart really is doing a
pitter-patter at spending so much. Right now, fortuitously, I have the
money, but still feel
Looks like one of those pix that seemed like a good idea at the time ...
;-))
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
frank theriault wrote:
i thought it looked pretty cool when i took it. now
i'm not so sure. still, here it is for your consideration:
They're all just so cute, (ya big softy)...
William Robb wrote:
I got roped into buying a calender page for my kennel club.
Here is what I have to offer.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/IMGP9675.html
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/IMGP9676.html
I can remember when I worked for Hawker Aircraft in 1957 that we had a very
large machine room using NC controllers. I don't think the technology was
all that new, maybe ten years or so? Engineers on the list will have a
better idea.
HTH
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original
I'm no expert on big glass prices, but I think this was a very good
deal. Congratulations,.
Paul
On Oct 30, 2005, at 9:39 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I placed my bid and just won an F* 600 F4:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemssPageName=ADME:B:
EOIBSAA:US:11Item=7556939330
I
Scott,
I love the picture of the two girls together.
I have a similar one with my boys.
#1 was so excited when #2 arrived that he just had to hold the baby.
(Hard to do when #1 is only 2 years old.)
I see your problem is similar and really enjoyed seeing them together.
It brought back lots of
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I placed my bid and just won an F* 600 F4:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemssPageName=ADME:B:EOIBSAA:US:11Item=7556939330
Joe, you rat bastard! If only I had $7k for the lens I want
Okay, now I need
Saw this as I was about to board the train for San Francisco Friday. It's
one of those that seemed like a good idea to grab, but deep down you think
it's a wasted shot. So, WTF, with digi I can do it without feeling guilt
at having wasted a frame. Now I'm feeling guilty about posting it here
Bill,
77 for the interaction between the three.
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/30/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're all just so cute, (ya big softy)...
William Robb wrote:
I got roped into buying a calender page for my kennel club.
Here is what I have to offer.
- Original Message -
Definitetly:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/IMGP9677.html
for the record, if anyone is keeping track, my first D was replaced because
the power-switch wouldn't stop the lens down when pushed to the DOF preview
location.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: With a fluttering heart...
I'm no expert on big glass prices, but I think this was a very good deal.
That's only 600 bucks more than I paid for my A600/5.6.
I would say that was a very good deal indeed.
Interestingly, over at
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: With a fluttering heart...
I placed my bid and just won an F* 600 F4:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemssPageName=ADME:B:EOIBSAA:US:11Item=7556939330
I never thought I'd own one. Wow. But my heart really is doing a
And a small tracked vehicle to mount the whole assembly on for travel...
Christian wrote:
- Original Message - From: Joseph Tainter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I placed my bid and just won an F* 600 F4:
Maybe just a little red wagon to pull your lens and tripod around in?
-Mat
On 10/30/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And a small tracked vehicle to mount the whole assembly on for travel...
Christian wrote:
Okay, now I need recommendations for a tripod and head for Big Bertha.
The
There seems to be something very wrong with the process as you've described
it.
Apart from anything else, when setting the lightness to minus 100, you'll
get a black screen - no info. Care to double check the steps and the
process?
BTW, I agree with everything that Godfrey said ...
Shel
You
Try it, it doesn't work the way you think it does.
I posted this a while ago:
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_beast.html
I just did a conversion using the method I described...
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_beastbw.html
Possibly not the best candidate, but I did
Another vote for 9677
-P
William Robb wrote:
I got roped into buying a calender page for my kennel club.
Here is what I have to offer.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/IMGP9675.html
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/IMGP9676.html
Hi!
I placed my bid and just won an F* 600 F4:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemssPageName=ADME:B:EOIBSAA:US:11Item=7556939330
I never thought I'd own one. Wow. But my heart really is doing a
pitter-patter at spending so much. Right now, fortuitously, I have the
money, but
Hi!
I got roped into buying a calender page for my kennel club.
Here is what I have to offer.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/IMGP9675.html
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/IMGP9676.html
Hi!
My monitors are 1024X768 as well. What I do on a Mac is drag the pic
straight from the web browser window and drop it onto the desktop. Then I
double-click on that new icon on my desktop and it opens the pic in a
simple picture-viewing utility application as large as the screen will
allow,
Focal length more than half a meter? More than two yards!
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
I placed my bid and just won an F* 600 F4:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemssPageName=ADME:B:EOIBSAA:US:11Item=7556939330
I never thought I'd own one. Wow. But my heart really is doing a
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: With a fluttering heart...
Focal length more than half a meter? More than two yards!
600mm= 6/10 meter.
Approximately 23.6 inches.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: PESO Silk purse or sows ear?
Hi!
My monitors are 1024X768 as well. What I do on a Mac is drag the pic
straight from the web browser window and drop it onto the desktop. Then I
double-click on that new icon on my desktop and it
Hey, I can dream can't I...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: With a fluttering heart...
Focal length more than half a meter? More than two yards!
600mm= 6/10 meter.
Approximately 23.6 inches.
William Robb
--
When you're worried or
Wow! I think all my Pentax lenses could probably fit inside
this one and weigh less.
Have fun,
Gautam
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Tainter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 6:39 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: With a fluttering heart...
I
1. Create a new adjustment layer Hue/Saturation
2a. Set Hue to -180
2b. Set Saturation to +100
2c. Set Lightness to -100
3. Change Mode to Lab Color, (if asked, yes do discard the layer).
4. In channels delete layer a.
5 Convert to gray scale.
Adjust curves or brightness/contrast for fine
Yeah, like your guy looking down a hole .. .right Shel? ;-)
Seriously, it's a technically excellent shot but it has little real
content or weight to it.
Godfrey
On Oct 30, 2005, at 6:40 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Looks like one of those pix that seemed like a good idea at the
time ...
G'day Rob.
Mate, I like it...2 thumbs up.
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor.
Grafton
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 30 October 2005 11:25 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO Silk purse or sows ear?
Another pic from my trip. Bad bad Rob, I
Stood on the beach in Monterey this morning with my daughter. This
dog was having the best time chasing away all the sea birds.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, handheld
ISO 200, 1/1000 sec @ f/8.0
Converted from raw using Capture One LE
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2424.htm
Comments welcome
Hello Boris,
Not quite sure what the experiment is. I'm generally not as
interested in animal shots in a zoo, where the animal is obviously 'in
the zoo.'
Brutally, doesn't really do much for me.
--
Bruce
Sunday, October 30, 2005, 9:57:00 AM, you wrote:
BL Hi!
BL I am also experimenting...
Wow! That's a huge lens. Congratulations.
I can understand your concern. I certainly never spent this much at once, on
photographic equipment.
I guess I never will. Not that I don't WANT to, but...
I do use a 510mm set-up sometimes. A 300mm and a 1.7 adapter. But the 600mm
delivers a much brighter
G'day Bruce.
Really like the drops of water in the air.
It implies to the viewer the force with which the dog has entered the
water. i.e.: To raise the water drops that high.
My 0.02c worth.
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor.
Grafton.
Australia
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton
Exactly - actually, Frank's pic provided the impetus for posting the
guy-looking-down-the-hole pic. ;-))
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Yeah, like your guy looking down a hole .. .right Shel? ;-)
Seriously, it's a technically
Retractable Thu-the-lens-metered Flash.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What's RTF?
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Rob Studdert
As for the
Of course, Mark. Pentax has finallly taken Herb's advice and gone out of
business. Wal-Mart bought up the remaining cameras and is having a
close-out sale on them.
signed, Gloom and doom.
a smilely here for those who can not recognize humor unless it is
spelled out in detail like this
On 30/10/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I got roped into buying a calender page for my kennel club.
Here is what I have to offer.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/IMGP9675.html
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/IMGP9676.html
Nero works fine... With Windows.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi group
I'll be talking to the service guy who upgraded my PC Monday, but i thought i'd
run this
by to see if i can get a start
Hi, I tried it again. Looks to me that you get the same results
eliminating the Hue/Sat manipulation and just converting to Lab color and
working with the luminosity or lightness channel. It's an OK technique for
some conversions, but there are many other BW conversions that offer far
greater
More advice needed.
I saw, somewhere, mention of a cable
release (switch) for the *ist D. I need
to make one can someone please let me
know what I need? Does one modify a
Canon cable?
Don
--
Dr E D F Williams
___
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
See
I tried to fix the spelling mistake, but
too many copies had been mailed out by
the time I did. And it's not quite right
anyway because the camera is faulty.
Belief.
D
graywolf wrote:
Retractable Thu-the-lens-metered Flash.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
On 30/10/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
2c. Set Lightness to -100
I thought the lightness was set to 000 ?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Well, they were correct grin.
With this damn PS Digital camera I am trying to use I have to spend
minutes trying to figure out how to tell the damn camera to do something
I know how to do almost without thinking with a purely manual camera.
With a manual camera it takes me about 10 minutes to
101 - 193 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
