Douglas Newman wrote:
Actually, it's the opposite. CMOS use much less power
than CCD but they have higher noise levels.
ok
Canon CMOS have very low noise levels because of a
proprietary noise elimination circuit that is
patented by Canon. This type of technology only works
with
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
So, how well does Canon do at higher ISO setting? Do they equal or exceed
what we've seen thus far from Pentax?
Not sure you can extract viable conclusions about CMOS this way, Shel,
in the sense that the software plays a great part in the equation.
On 1/10/06, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
The lack of noise at high sensitivity is something people claim as an
advantage for CMOS. Supposedly a drawback is that they suck more power.
Just the opposite dear boy. They use less power - that is why they are
attractive.
--
Cheers,
Welcome back Alan!
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
William Robb wrote:
I fear I may be in for a new monitor to replace the CRT I've been using
for the past 5 years or so.
I presume that flat panels are the way to go now.
Whats good in a screen of a reasonable size, 19-21 inches?
Thanks
On a budget of sorts, I'm super happy with my 19 Dell
It's quite funny. Everyone are so used to see Canon and Nikon labels
when shooting on street, they don't think you working, but shooting with
Pentax you get attention and nobody complaint. Of course once and again
you hear some old pentaxians exclaim Pentax!, almost like heureka and
approach
On 1/10/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I shot about 1500 pictures.
I edited it down to a couple of hundred.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/2006vacation.html
Great stuff. Love the 'Women' shot. Bestiality too ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Cotty wrote:
On 1/10/06, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
The lack of noise at high sensitivity is something people claim as an
advantage for CMOS. Supposedly a drawback is that they suck more power.
Just the opposite dear boy. They use less power - that is why they are
On 2/10/06, Roman, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's quite funny. Everyone are so used to see Canon and Nikon labels
when shooting on street, they don't think you working, but shooting with
Pentax you get attention and nobody complaint. Of course once and again
you hear some old pentaxians
Looks like a great trip. I love this one:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/vacation/festival/pages/_IGP2733.htm
It made me laugh.
Some good stuff in there.
doug
On Oct 2, 2006, at 12:20 AM, William Robb wrote:
I shot about 1500 pictures.
I edited it down to a couple of hundred.
You got yourself an Erwitt there, Bill.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Looks like a great trip. I love this one:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/vacation/festival/pages/_IGP2733.htm
It made me laugh.
Some good stuff in there.
doug
On Oct 2, 2006, at 12:20 AM, William Robb wrote:
I shot
Hey Cotty,
I was away for a week so just read the news...
Congratulations and the best of luck. Any chance of any Top Gear stuff
(given Hamsters recovery) ?
Cheers,
Simon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: Friday, 29 September
Reloading 110 cassettes is a bit of a pain as you have to carefully
slit the cartridge open and re-roll the film with the backing paper.
You also have to be certain to use no perf or single perf film, and
orient single perf the right way, and be sure that your camera will
work without the
Speaking of Erwitt, he was in town the other day. I took my wife up
to Lexington to see an exhibition of a friend's paintings at the UK
Art Museum. While we were there, we wandered through some other
exhibits on site, and found a room that had several of Erwitt's
prints on the walls. After
During my collecting days, I did pick up the Auto 110 Super and the 18mm
Pan. I even found the transparent Auto 110, and the Beige colored 110.
I got the Super new when it came out. I guess it's kind of rare?
Do you still have any of those?
If so, are you interested in selling?
John
It's been mentioned before, but hey Petnax (just going with the spelling
in the subject line)! How about a 110 DSLR with the original lens
mount? Nice small sensor, fixed aperture, small review screen (ok
really small, but who cares?), make it ISO 200/400, RAW would be good,
but I'd settle
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Simon King wrote:
I was away for a week so just read the news...
Congratulations and the best of luck. Any chance of any Top Gear stuff
(given Hamsters recovery) ?
Cotty will be working with ITV, TG is BBC. Is it possible now you are
a freelancer, Cotty?
Kostas
--
PDML
On Oct 2, 2006, at 12:17 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Film affords one a quiet period of relaxation and gentle anticipation
between the shooting and the viewing. Sorta nice change, huh?
I'm not sure that this is any different for me. I don't shoot
quickly, and don't do much other than glance at a
On Oct 1, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Eric Featherstone wrote:
At the beginning of September I went along to the Spitfire Anniversary
Air Show at Duxford. Not many Spitfires actually flew because of high
winds but there were plenty of other displays. I've put together a
small gallery. Comments
On Oct 2, 2006, at 4:48 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Oct 1, 2006, at 11:41 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
No matter how
little intentional
art was involved, or how poor the exposures were, as a group
they deserve
some attention as a piece of history.
I concur.
I agree as well, but someone
Welcome back Alan!
Kostas
Thanks Kostas. :-)
Regards,
Alan Chan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Oct 2, 2006, at 8:08 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 2/10/06, Roman, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's quite funny. Everyone are so used to see Canon and Nikon labels
when shooting on street, they don't think you working, but
shooting with
Pentax you get attention and nobody complaint. Of course
A number of people have written me to let me know the server is
sending out double password notices. Indeed, I got a set at my work
address. I'm not certain what is causing this, but I suspect some
mucking about by the hosting company; I've gotten a couple odd
messages from their
On Oct 2, 2006, at 8:25 AM, John Celio wrote:
As for the backing paper, couldn't I just put some thick black tape
over the
window and count frames if I really needed to?
Not really. The paper thickness is calculated into the position of
the focal plane and determines where the emulsion
John:
Looking inside my Auto110, I don't see anything that would need
to touch the film itself for the camera to function. There's a
little gear in the left film chamber, which I'm assuming is
turned by the spool inside the 110 cassette. I'll have to open a
110 cassette to make sure
Some nice shots. My favorite is the last one on the first page. Your
dog giving your wife a wake-up hug. Great shot.
Paul
On Oct 2, 2006, at 12:20 AM, William Robb wrote:
I shot about 1500 pictures.
I edited it down to a couple of hundred.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/2006vacation.html
I tend to shoot the same way. I don't waste a lot of frames with
digital or 35mm film. However, when shooting 10-frame rolls in the 6x7,
I'm even more selective. I've always found it to be a camera that
really forces one to think.
Paul
On Oct 2, 2006, at 4:57 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On
I recommended AVG to a friend, and it appears they have gone pay-only.
I've always used a free version. Does anyone know if it is still possible
to get a free version, or do they have any other recommendations?
TIA
John
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
On Oct 2, 2006, at 4:18 AM, William Robb wrote:
I fear I may be in for a new monitor to replace the CRT I've been
using
for the past 5 years or so.
I presume that flat panels are the way to go now.
Whats good in a screen of a reasonable size, 19-21 inches?
I'm using an Apple Cinema
The free version is still listed on their site:
http://www.grisoft.com/doc/289/lng/us/tpl/tpl01
and
http://free.grisoft.com/doc/1
As for a recommendation I've been using Avast Home Edition on my new
machine (Norton was driving me nuts on my old computer):
I know what you mean. I felt that way every time I used to pull out
the Hasselblad. I realized that it was using the tripod that did the
trick ... slows down my actions to meet my thinking pace ... so I
have started using a tripod more and more since.
Godfrey
On Oct 2, 2006, at 11:19 AM,
It's more a matter of exposure evaluation than image processing,
Shel. You need to stuff the highlight areas where you want detail up
as close to saturation as you can get without hitting the saturation
level, which often seems like overexposure to a film camera shooter,
and then adjust
I got a new version of the free AVG a couple of weeks ago.
Don
John Forbes wrote:
I recommended AVG to a friend, and it appears they have gone pay-only.
I've always used a free version. Does anyone know if it is still possible
to get a free version, or do they have any other
In general, the differences between CCD and CMOS sensors today are
more important to the hardware/manufacturing process then any
benefits of one type over the other are to the photographer. How a
specific design is implemented and built into a camera affects the
photographer much more than
Thanks, David.
There seem to be several different sites for AVG, presumably aimed at
different markets, and the ones I looked at didn't list the free version.
But I knew I'd find the answer here!
Thanks again.
John
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:35:19 +0100, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In Cape Town just after the war there was a company called Movie Snaps.
They may still be there for all I know. They employed half a dozen men
with Leicas (with 50ft magazines) who took your picture as you walked
along and handed you a card with a number. The next day you could go to
the shop
I thought folks on these lists might be interested in some of my
informal testing with the DA21. I've posted to DPReview.com's Pentax
SLR Forum:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?
forum=1036message=20283944
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 10/1/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A friend and her coven put on a yard sale yesterday to generate some money
for a local charity. I stopped by intending to make some photos and
document the event. Alas, my batteries crapped out and I had no spares, so
I could only get about
Last time I tried to find AVG Free the free version was well hidden.
However a search in google for AVG Free and a bit of poking around
eventually will get you here:
http://free.grisoft.com/doc/avg-anti-virus-free/lng/us/tpl/v5
John Forbes wrote:
I recommended AVG to a friend, and it appears
Hi Godfrey,
Thanks for the test! Sharpness looks good, althogh I was really hoping
there would be less distortion. I had a quick go at removing it in PS,
and worse, it seems not to be the simple kind PS's lens distortion
slider can fix - is this true?
And by the way, hi everyone! Have been
On 10/1/06, Eric Featherstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the beginning of September I went along to the Spitfire Anniversary
Air Show at Duxford. Not many Spitfires actually flew because of high
winds but there were plenty of other displays. I've put together a
small gallery. Comments
Certainly there is a great variation in the pattern and pace of
shooting for each individual. Post processing being THE big difference,
particularly for those who don't do 'dark room'.
In my case, when on a photo/sightseeing trip, I don't want editing or
PS capability, simply a way of clearing the
On 10/1/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip In the air, the
Spitfire is the most beautiful aircraft ever made, IMHO.
Is there an airplane on the ground that's prettier?
cheers,
frank
ps: I agree with you, BTW, Mark
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Glad to hear that Paul.
I intend to shoot my 6x7 this weekend(our Thanksgiving) but it might
only be BW. The only lab in this area, that i know of, that could do
C41 and E6, of the 120 size is no longer here.
At least the BW i can do at home, when th emood hits.
LOL
Dave
Quoting Paul
Very clever. In Amsterdam - if you bicycle gets stolen. Ypou can walk around
the next corner and buy a used one - perhaps even your own bike!
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is really a response to Paul's bandwagon thread. Yesterday was
strange. I spent the afternoon in PJ mode, shooting a family picnic
with the K100D. I nearly filled a 1GB card in about two hours.
This is my daughter. As I was taking this, she was explaining to me
that it was measuring her
I put a 1, 2, 3 etc. in front. My last exposure is appr. 41500 on the D.
I make folders saying 3-35000-october 2005.
This is not a perfect system thoug. When I get the K10D I'll have to thinkof
something else - perhaps K-11255-12500 - january 2007.
You may use a photo dasabase like ACDSee or
Thanks for your comment, Frank. I don't usually do cute (except with my
cats) so it's nice to know that someone thinks I caught it.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank theriault
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/dog_w_helmet.html
I was going for cute here.
If you were going for
I understand that part, and that's what I've been doing (I shoot a lot @
+.3,+.7, even +1, and sometimes, depending on the light and the scene,
+1.3), and getting good results. But ... when I want a low key shot, with
lots of dark areas in a photo, that's where my results suffer. Noise in
the
Interesting shot ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Scott Loveless
This is my daughter. As I was taking this, she was explaining to me
that it was measuring her hand.
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#4981291498720985106
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Thanks, Bill ... what I intended to do was photograph the items for sale
and the way they were laid out, figuring some cute pix might be of some
interest to the women, maybe their kids, and then get some people shots as
well. Always carry spare, fresh or freshly charged batteries.
Shel
I find that if I want low-key with lots of shadow, I get better results by
pulling down the shadows in post processing, generally with curves adjustments.
Exposing for heavy blacks always creates noise, particularly at high ISO.
Paul
-- Original message --
From:
Hi!
This was taken just outside the Golden Gate Bridge outside of the bay
in San Francisco. I'm curious as to what fish are hanging around
this rugged bit of coast.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, handheld
ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/13
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3347a.htm
For some
Den 2. okt. 2006 kl. 11.46 skrev Doug Brewer:
A number of people have written me to let me know the server is
sending out double password notices. Indeed, I got a set at my work
address. I'm not certain what is causing this, but I suspect some
mucking about by the hosting company; I've gotten
William Robb wrote:
I shot about 1500 pictures.
I edited it down to a couple of hundred.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/2006vacation.html
Have fun
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'll save the link
Hi!
I thought it interesting to see the fog blowing into the bay. The
Golden Gate Bridge is partially shrouded but you can still see out in
the bay, some sun that hasn't been obscured yet.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/1000 sec @ f/8.0
Hi!
I shot about 1500 pictures.
I edited it down to a couple of hundred.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/2006vacation.html
Bill, you sure did have some fun... I liked most that green vehicle with
green trailer. It made me think of my *istD and Jostein's battery grip
for it ;-).
Boris
Right down the bottom of the products page:
http://www.grisoft.com/doc/products-avg-anti-virus-free-edition/lng/uk/tpl/tpl01
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/02 Mon AM 10:15:56 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Subject: OT - Free antirus program AVG now paid
David Savage wrote:
Thanks for sharing Bill.
Pretty country.
These two made me laugh:
Bleeding obvious!:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/vacation/festival/pages/_IGP2733.htm
I just knew it had to be a sign shot - HAR!
one of those, damn - I wish I'd been there shots for me
Hi!
At the beginning of September I went along to the Spitfire Anniversary
Air Show at Duxford. Not many Spitfires actually flew because of high
winds but there were plenty of other displays. I've put together a
small gallery. Comments welcome.
Hello everyone.
Well, recently I turned 35 ;-), and my best friend and my brother asked
me what kind of gift I wanted. Or, they threatened, they would buy me
something of their own choosing and that most probably it would be
useless...
So, today I finished doing proper backup of all my
Doug Brewer wrote:
Speaking of Erwitt, he was in town the other day. I took my wife up
to Lexington to see an exhibition of a friend's paintings at the UK
Art Museum. While we were there, we wandered through some other
exhibits on site, and found a room that had several of Erwitt's
prints
Back from Disneyland. I enjoyed it, but I did not enjoy the crowds. Fewer
people after Labor Day, but still way too many. I waited over 1 hour for 1
ride,
and never did again. Others I really wanted to catch, I did during the
fireworks at night, or 1/2 hour before closing.
But I have no
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/02 Mon PM 02:18:48 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO - Yard Sale Snap
Thanks, Bill ... what I intended to do was photograph the items for sale
and the way they were laid out, figuring some cute pix might
Yes - and that's certainly true around here. However, I'd have had to
leave the site of the sale and drive about a mile or so to the nearest
shopping area, and the AA Battery Store wasn't going to be open for almost
another hour, so I just went off to work.
Shel
[Original Message]
From:
That's what I've been seeing too.
Photog hires a few shooters to cover all three rings at a show and
shoots lots (just hold the button down). There is a fancy booth with
viewing stations. All you have to do is ID your dog and write down the
sequence numbers/class and you can buy all 138 full-res
On 10/2/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is really a response to Paul's bandwagon thread. Yesterday was
strange. I spent the afternoon in PJ mode, shooting a family picnic
with the K100D. I nearly filled a 1GB card in about two hours.
This is my daughter. As I was taking
What a wonderful shot!
Dan
On 9/30/06, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again captured in the back yard with the Sigma 50mm macro.
http://tinyurl.com/fogj5
Any constructive criticism welcome.
James M
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I love # 139. Now THAT was an airplane!
Dan
On 10/1/06, Eric Featherstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the beginning of September I went along to the Spitfire Anniversary
Air Show at Duxford. Not many Spitfires actually flew because of high
winds but there were plenty of other displays. I've
On 10/2/06, D Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glad to hear that Paul.
I intend to shoot my 6x7 this weekend(our Thanksgiving) but it might
only be BW. The only lab in this area, that i know of, that could do
C41 and E6, of the 120 size is no longer here.
At least the BW i can do at home,
Sounds good.
I recently turned 54 and my wife said NO, to every camera request.
Go fiqure.:-)
Dave
Quoting Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello everyone.
Well, recently I turned 35 ;-), and my best friend and my brother asked
me what kind of gift I wanted. Or, they threatened, they
Marnie -
Iceberg is best handled when grabbed with both hands and torn apart!
Maybe it was supposed to be an insect head with antennae and shrimp for
eyes. ;) *Presentation* is nice, but that one sounds ludicrous.
I know what you mean about crowds. I'd probably be willing to go to
On Oct 2, 2006, at 10:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really, that half dome of iceberg lettuce with shrimp sticking out
of it on
toothpicks was one of the funniest things I have ever seen, and
sure didn't
look like a salad.
It was only after I started writing this I realized --
was it
On 9/25/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought it interesting to see the fog blowing into the bay. The
Golden Gate Bridge is partially shrouded but you can still see out in
the bay, some sun that hasn't been obscured yet.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/1000 sec @
On 10/2/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot about 1500 pictures.
I edited it down to a couple of hundred.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/2006vacation.html
Have fun
I looked through the Garlic Festival shots, and was quite disappointed
in that I didn't see a single photo of a
In a message dated 10/2/2006 9:38:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie -
Iceberg is best handled when grabbed with both hands and torn apart!
Maybe it was supposed to be an insect head with antennae and shrimp for
eyes. ;) *Presentation* is nice, but that one sounds
On 10/1/06, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again captured in the back yard with the Sigma 50mm macro.
http://tinyurl.com/fogj5
Any constructive criticism welcome.
Wow!
The 3D effect is palpable!
Terrific shot!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
In a message dated 10/2/2006 2:53:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A number of people have written me to let me know the server is
sending out double password notices. Indeed, I got a set at my work
address. I'm not certain what is causing this, but I suspect some
On 9/25/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/9/06, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks, yes, it is a wind surfer.
You could always use the clone tool...and have a fleet of them :-)
YES!
They could be in formation, perhaps spelling out patriotic sayings,
like God Bless
I think a columnist in the Mercury News expressed it better last week;
while a photograph doesn't lie, it can be selective as to which truth
is shown
Sounds like some lawyers I know (not referring to Knarf)
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/1/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good shot with some real action motion blurr, Bill
Dave
Got this shot last night at a local high school football game. If you look
closely, you can see the ball in flight. Taken with the *ist D at 1600 ISO
and 1/60 sec.
Quoting frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 10/2/06, D Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glad to hear that Paul.
I intend to shoot my 6x7 this weekend(our Thanksgiving) but it might
only be BW. The only lab in this area, that i know of, that could do
C41 and E6, of the 120 size is no longer
Thanks for your continued support,
Doug
No Doug. Thank you for all your efforts !
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Doubled Notices, a message from the List Guy
A number of people have written me to let me know the server is
What - no photos???
I, too, dislike designer food. Especially if it ends up
tasting like...well, not tasting
very good.
But I can't imagine in a million years going to Disneyland -
you couldn't pay me to.
I'm trying to think of a guilty pleassure of mine that would
make all of you squirm...
You're welcome.
I couldn't shoot straight on to the wall as I was getting my
reflection in the center window, so the distortion you're seeing is a
combination of barrel distortion and keystoning from the angle I was
shooting at. There's also probably a bit of off-axis tilt as well, it
is
That one made my day!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, October 2, 2006, 12:15:34 AM, you wrote:
DB Looks like a great trip. I love this one:
DB http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/vacation/festival/pages/_IGP2733.htm
DB It made me laugh.
DB Some good stuff in there.
DB doug
DB On Oct 2, 2006,
In a message dated 10/2/2006 10:22:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to think of a guilty pleassure of mine that would
make all of you squirm...
h. Watching reruns of Vegas, Charlies Angels and Buck
Rogers ?
(alas, I can't find those anymore on tv)
eating
In Spanish, in the very active site with the
'offensive' logo:
http://tinyurl.com/fdvxk
http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/pentax-k10d-mario-britschgi,1_2742
You can try with an automatic translator:
http://tinyurl.com/eaufa
Thanks, Knarf
Hope to see you at GFM next year
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
frank theriault
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 1:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Re Field Goal
On 10/1/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL
hi,
anybody here using UFRaw on linux? i use only linux at home (currently
on a heavily updated slackware 10.2) and UFRaw (using DCRaw) seems to
be the best option yet. Digikam also seems to have a basic Raw
converter plugin. how does UFRaw compare with the Adobe Raw plugin?
am also planning to
On 2/10/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
I judge the cameras I buy based on the total package, not specifics
of component implementation.
Wise words.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
I recommended AVG to a friend, and it appears they have gone pay-only.
I've always used a free version. Does anyone know if it is still possible
to get a free version,
When AVG came out they promised to always maintain a free personal version.
They have, but they are finding better ways
Whaddya mean, Frank? There's a real gen-yew-wine
dancing garlic clove right here:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/vacation/festival/pages/_IGP2799.htm
(fun pix!)
Rick
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked through the Garlic Festival shots, and was
quite disappointed
in
On 2/10/06, Simon King, discombobulated, unleashed:
I was away for a week so just read the news...
Congratulations and the best of luck. Any chance of any Top Gear stuff
(given Hamsters recovery) ?
Har! I don't know anyone on that prog. Would love to work on it - maybe
I'll get lucky ;-)
Time for a bee joke.
Two beekeepers are chatting. One says to the other, ' So how many bees
do you have then?'
The second beekeeper answers, 'Oh about twenty thousand'.
The first says, 'Twenty thousand, eh? Right. And so how many hives do
you have?'
The second answers, ' Ten hives'.
The
On Oct 2, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
In my case, when on a photo/sightseeing trip, I don't want editing or
PS capability, simply a way of clearing the card to safe storage 'til
returning home.
Odd, I suppose, but the image processing will be done as a separate
event.
I did that on
On 2/10/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty will be working with ITV, TG is BBC. Is it possible now you are
a freelancer, Cotty?
Of course. Actually Top Gear is made by an outside production company,
but it doesn't matter. I am (will be) free to lobby as many possible
On Oct 2, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Subash Jeyan wrote:
anybody here using UFRaw on linux? i use only linux at home (currently
on a heavily updated slackware 10.2) and UFRaw (using DCRaw) seems to
be the best option yet. Digikam also seems to have a basic Raw
converter plugin. how does UFRaw compare
Me, too. Nice composition particularly.
Speaking of inchworms, though, the digital thing is
creeping up on you, Scott. Your tag line Shoot more
film! will be replaced with Shoot film!, then
Shoot some film!, then Shoot a little film, if you
feel like it, and finally just Shoot! And then
we'll
Hmm. I don't recall receiving any files, but it *has* been really
pretty busy lately and I might have missed them.
Similar to Paul's effort, I find that for some images you just need
to pull the shadows down with a Levels/Curves adjustment layer to
push the noise into solid black. Here's an
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
