Re: Pentax D FA* 400/4 ED IF

On 06.10.2006, at 08:34 , Cotty wrote: > Or you could join the collective > > Oh no! Did Canon changed you that much Cotty??? ;-) Pozdrowienia Sylwek -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listi

NorCal: SF Fleet Week

Any NorCal PDMLers going to Fleet Week in San Francisco this weekend? I'm going to try to get down to where we were last year to shoot the Blue Angels and the other air shows this Saturday between 12 and 5. I can't guarantee I'll be there, since I told my brother I'd help him with something, b

Re: Pretty Cheap SD

That matches what I've seen reported; you should get at least a 133x card, and you might see a very small improvement with 150x. On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:15:59PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote: > It might be able to take advantage of cards of 150X. > Paul > On Oct 5, 2006, at 10:45 PM, Joseph Tain

OT: GVS (RE: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > It all started with the Great Vowel Shift... > > -frank > == > Okay, I'll bite. What the heck is the Great Vowel Shift?

Re: Stuck Filter

> > From: Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/10/06 Fri AM 12:57:58 GMT > To: Pentax Discuss > Subject: Stuck Filter > > Hi guys, > > Well, I'm in quite a quandry now. I've got a polarizing filter stuck on > the front of one of my lenses, as I discovered the other day. Trying to >

Re: K10D and AF speed

So what camera would you say is "state of the art"? John On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:22:07 +0100, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes I did. > This video proofs or more suggests that it is fast with non USM lenses > too. > My only concern now is the IQ. If my expectations about IQ are fulfi

Re: Flat or punchy

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Tom C wrote: > The flatness actually enhanced the photo and made > it a better, more artful photograph, in my opinion. To which one could respond: "No, it's too flat for my liking." Excellent, we are commenting on a hypothetical picture. PDML first? :-) Kostas -- PDML Pen

Re: K10D and AF speed

LX Gold? ;-) On 06.10.2006, at 10:48 , John Forbes wrote: > So what camera would you say is "state of the art"? Pozdrowienia Sylwek -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Pentax DA 12-24/4

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: > >>> I have no idea where a credible source for MTF data on the DA14/2.8 >>> might be. I'm commenting based on what I see from examining 800-1000 >>> photographs made with it. >> >> I assumed th

Re: Pentax D FA* 400/4 ED IF

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, John Celio wrote: >> Because there's no actual gain from making a subframe lens at that >> length, so no reason to do a DA lens. > > Could you explain further? I was wondering why the long lenses were D-FA > too, and I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Not sure anyone re

Re: Pentax D FA* 400/4 ED IF

- Original Message - From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Another part of the rumor is that it might be an F5.6. We will just have > to wait and see. I sincerely hope not. Such lenses are rather passè today and much better served by zooms; like 80-400/5.6. A 400/4 is about the

Re: K10 samples

On 10/06/06 8:29 AM, "Ken Takeshita", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am sure they are still working on the firmware. But these samples show already v1.0 Ken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Pentax DA 12-24/4

Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >> On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: >> I have no idea where a credible source for MTF data on the DA14/2.8 might be. I'm commenting based on what I see from examining 800-1000 photogr

Re: K10 samples

On 10/5/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I downloaded the sample files, and am printing 10x14 inch prints from > them. > The picture of the sheep has some veiling flare. > Good one Pentax > Otherwise, the pictures look fine, I must say. The same but selected samples also shwon in

Re: K10 samples

On 10/06/06 8:29 AM, "Ken Takeshita", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am sure they are still working on the firmware. They must be still working on high ISO samples. I like to see other sample routines such as night scene etc. Ken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net

Re: K10 samples

- Original Message - From: "Digital Image Studio" Subject: Re: K10 samples >> I downloaded the sample files, and am printing 10x14 inch prints from >> them. >> The picture of the sheep has some veiling flare. >> Good one Pentax >> Otherwise, the pictures look fine, I must say. > >

Re: Pentax D FA* 400/4 ED IF

On Oct 6, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Pål Jensen wrote: > I sincerely hope not. Such lenses are rather passè today and much > better > served by zooms; like 80-400/5.6. A 400/4 is about the longest and > fastest > lens that can be handheld, a real bonus with Pentax SR. In addition > it will > work wel

Re: Pentax D FA* 400/4 ED IF

I use my 400 on a tripod where practical. But I frequently use it handheld as well. For example when shooting birds in flight. For that both the speed of the f4 lens and the SR of the K10D will give be a big advantage over my current A4009/5.6 on the *istD. Paul -- Original message

FS Friday -- ist and battery grip

I'm selling my *ist and BG-20 grip. Using the quote form at KEH, the *ist and grip are EX+. Everything works as it should. KEH is currently listing the same gear for about $260. I'm offering the set for $225 shipped within the CONUS. Shipping will be a bit extra for addresses outside the lower

Re: K10 samples

Hi Ken, I don't understand your comment about "in camera raw processing." These pics are JPEG's, and the two that I dl'd last night had no EXIF info (that I could find). So where does raw fit into all this? The pic of the old man looked pretty good on my screen. Bokeh of the 70mm looked ok as

Re: Pentax medium formats

I have to agree about durability. MF version of 645 is like a piece of rock. 645 is great for portraits, because of handholdability and shallow DOF. And of course for landscapes. Gasha Mark Roberts wrote: > On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:14:46 +1000, you wrote: > Somewhere I have a list of the advantage

Re: Pentax DA 12-24/4

Indeed AFAIR the DS/DL/K100 only have the "normal" program preset. D users (as Z1(p) and probably MZ-S) can choose for MTF, speed, depth or normal and set by custom fuction. 2006/10/6, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >

Re: Pentax D FA* 400/4 ED IF

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 6/10/06, Gonz, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >>>Anyone want a brain? One owner, only lightly used... >>> >> >>You might get some offers in the Canon forum. :) > > > > > > Or you could join the collective > >

Re: Quick question

Hawaii and Alaska. -- Original message -- From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi! > > People often say "lower 48" or "low 48" in regard to some of the United > States. What are the states that do not belong to low 48? > > Thanks. > > Boris > > -- > PDM

Re: Quick question

Alaska and Hawaii. Tom Lesser On Oct 6, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: > Hi! > > People often say "lower 48" or "low 48" in regard to some of the United > States. What are the states that do not belong to low 48? > > Thanks. > > Boris > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdm

Quick question

Hi! People often say "lower 48" or "low 48" in regard to some of the United States. What are the states that do not belong to low 48? Thanks. Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

RE: Quick question

The term most often used is "Lower 48," sometimes - more rarely - is Continental US (you may have seen the abbreviation CONUS). The two states you asked about are Alaska and Hawaii. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Boris Liberman > People often say "lower 48" or "low 48" > in regard to som

Re: Quick question

Alaska and Hawaii, which are not contiguous to the other 48 states, Hawaii being a chain of Islands, and Alaska having Canada in between it and the rest of the Continental US. -Adam Boris Liberman wrote: > Hi! > > People often say "lower 48" or "low 48" in regard to some of the United > Stat

fOR SALE fRIDAY

http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQfgtpZ1QQfrppZ25QQsassZjco Fyi, 5 items found : SMC Pentax 55mm F1.8 K Series Lens - 35mm SLR / DSLR - $69.99 $79.99 Not specified 1d 10h 44m RMC Tokina 400mm F5.6 Super Telephoto Lens M42 For Pentax Screw mount 35mm SLR - $129.99 Not specified 2d

Re: Quick question

Boris, These states were added during my lifetime to the USA. They were territories and lobbied to become states with full voting rights. Hawaii is a long way from the mainland USA and occupied by Japanese tourists. Alaska is still a frontier town with the population in wet coastal areas. (It's par

Re: Quick question

Hi! > The term most often used is "Lower 48," sometimes - more rarely - is > Continental US (you may have seen the abbreviation CONUS). The two states > you asked about are Alaska and Hawaii. Great many thanks everyone who responded. Well, now I am just a little bit wiser ;-). Thanks again! B

Re: NorCal: SF Fleet Week

Hello John, I really wish I could. As it stands I have a wedding to shoot that day so will be unable to attend. It sure was fun last year! -- Bruce Friday, October 6, 2006, 12:25:57 AM, you wrote: JC> Any NorCal PDMLers going to Fleet Week in San Francisco this weekend? I'm JC> going to tr

Re: FS: the remaining stuffs...

Am interested in Cokin P121 filter. How much to ship to Ottawa, K2K 2E6? dk On 10/5/06, Alan Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a little updates & price cuts. Feel free to make me any offers. I can > cut the prices a little more with multi-items. Always quote the lowest > shipping by air. > h

Re: Quick question

Alaska, Hawaii, and any non State overseas possessions such as Puerto Rico. Boris Liberman wrote: >Hi! > >People often say "lower 48" or "low 48" in regard to some of the United >States. What are the states that do not belong to low 48? > >Thanks. > >Boris > > > -- Things should be made as

Re: K10 samples

The K10D has the capability to produce a JPEG file (in camera) from a shot originally exposed as a RAW image - kind of like a RAW+JPEG exposure, but with the JPEG being created at a later time. In the (mostly Japanese) text alongside the image the line that identifies the firmware as V1.00 also

Re: K10 samples

OK, so if I understand you, the pics were made in RAW and converted to JPEG within the camera, using the camera firm/software, as opposed to being shot in JPEG or converted to JPEG in editing software like Photoshop. Correct? Shel > [Original Message] > From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Quick question

Alaska and Hawaii. "The Lower 48" means the same thing as "Continental US", or "the contiguous states". There is beyond those 50 states the District of Columbia (federal capital) and a couple of protectorates whose people are considered US Citizens. However the US is slowly becoming part of Mex

Re: Quick question

Canada. From: "Boris Liberman" > > People often say "lower 48" or "low 48" in regard to some of the United > States. What are the states that do not belong to low 48? > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Pentax DA 12-24/4

It's always been a question mark to me whether the MTF line was used in any of the DS' Program or Program-presets. Not that I use any of the Program modes much anyway ... I think my camera has been used only on Av and M modes this entire trip so far. Godfrey On Oct 6, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Thib

Re: K10 samples

Yes. Pages 98-99 in the K10D instruction manual show how you can select and tweak a RAW file into a JPEG, in camera. Godfrey On Oct 6, 2006, at 5:40 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > OK, so if I understand you, the pics were made in RAW and converted > to JPEG > within the camera, using the camera

Re: K10 samples

Yes. This a capability unique to the K10D and Nikon D80. -Adam Shel Belinkoff wrote: > OK, so if I understand you, the pics were made in RAW and converted to JPEG > within the camera, using the camera firm/software, as opposed to being shot > in JPEG or converted to JPEG in editing software lik

K10 samples

OK, so if I understand you, the pics were made in RAW and converted to JPEG within the camera, using the camera firm/software, as opposed to being shot in JPEG or converted to JPEG in editing software like Photoshop. Correct? Shel - I find this puzzling. Don't all JPEGs originate as RAW

Re: Quick question

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The term most often used is "Lower 48," sometimes - > more rarely - is Continental US That's 49 states; Alaska is Continental. The Lower 48 is equivalent to the Contiguous US. Doug __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam?

Re: Stuck Filter

That's what I thought, too. But I had one stuck on my old 200mm f2.5 and it worked. -Brendan --- Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 06/10/06, Brendan MacRae > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Doug, > > > > I'm kinda suprised by a lot of the advice you been > > given so far. The o

Re: K10 samples

The Olympus C8080WZ also had this capability. I don't know of any others that do at this time. Godfrey On Oct 6, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > Yes. > > This a capability unique to the K10D and Nikon D80. > > -Adam > > > Shel Belinkoff wrote: >> OK, so if I understand you, the pics were

Re: Quick question

--- graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: << "The Lower 48" means the same thing as "Continental US", or "the contiguous states". >> No, no, no, Alaska IS continental... It's not an island! (Neither is Rhode Island, but that's another story ;-).) Continguous, on the other hand, does indeed refer t

Re: K10 samples

That would be my interpretation, yes. The result should produce basically the same file as would have been produced by shooting in JPEG (or RAW+JPEG), but of course you've still got a RAW file for use with your favourite image editor. It's handy if you usually shoot RAW, but need a JPEG file fa

Re: Stuck Filter

A wide rubber band has usually worked for me. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Stuck Filter > On 06/10/06, Brendan MacRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Doug, >> >> I'm kinda suprised by a lot of the advice you been >> gi

Re: K10 samples

Joseph Tainter wrote: > OK, so if I understand you, the pics were made in RAW and converted to > JPEG within the camera, using the camera firm/software, as opposed to > being shot in JPEG or converted to JPEG in editing software like > Photoshop. Correct? > > Shel > > - > > I find this p

Re: K10 samples

On Oct 6, 2006, at 12:11, Joseph Tainter wrote: > > I find this puzzling. Don't all JPEGs originate as RAW data that are > then JPEG-ized in the camera? > Yep - but processed per the settings you have already selected BEFORE pressing the shutter release. > Pentax is advertising that you can do

Re: K10 samples

Another advantage would be if you are like me, I set white balance later. So if I was shooting in incandescent light, a normal jpeg would be wrong. Shooting Raw+jpeg would have me end up with a poor jpeg. Shooting raw alone and then later converting one image to jpeg in camera, hopefully the whit

Friday Foto Fun

It is that time of the year when Nobel prizes are heaped on a few deserving and needy. All the rest can always hope for the alternative Ig Nobel Prize, and that's where we find the photography connection. The math prize went down under to Nic Svenson and Piers Barnes who have calculated the

Re: Pentax D FA* 400/4 ED IF

>> Another part of the rumor is that it might be an F5.6. We will just have >> to wait and see. > >I sincerely hope not. Such lenses are rather passè today and much better >served by zooms; like 80-400/5.6. A 400/4 is about the longest and fastest >lens that can be handheld, a real bonus with Penta

PESO: Yosemite, halfdome plus reflection

Came across this one while selecting some stuff for large format prints today, it is a scan from a 67 slide taken at Yosemite. http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=182 A split ND filter was used to reduce contrast between the dome and its reflection ... This was taken during day h

Re: Pentax DA 12-24/4

> It's always been a question mark to me whether the MTF line was used > in any of the DS' Program or Program-presets. Not that I use any of > the Program modes much anyway ... I think my camera has been used > only on Av and M modes this entire trip so far. I only just recently discovered the "Pr

Re: Stuck Filter

mike wilson wrote: > As you are dealing with both a polariser and that something else > has come loose, I think it is unlikely that you are going to be > able to manage to remove it without damaging something or > unintentionally dismantling your lens. Unless you are very lucky > or skillful. Th

Re: K10 samples

>> This a capability unique to the K10D and Nikon D80. > The Olympus C8080WZ also had this capability. I don't know of any > others that do at this time. I believe most Olympus E-xxx dSLRs have that option, though I could be wrong. I think Olympus was the first company to feature RAW-->jpg in-c

RE: Pentax D FA* 400/4 ED IF

Now I understand why they call you Steady. Handholding a 4009mm is quite an achievement. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 6. oktober 2006 16:02 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail L

Re: PESO: Yosemite, halfdome plus reflection

Post card shot! Well seen and composed. I do have a question about focus/aperture. It may be the small file, the focus in combination with the chosen aperture, my eyes and/or monitor, but the dome ridge looks sharper than the intervening trees which, themselves, are a fair distance away. Does the 6

K10D Manual download

My servers must be overloaded again, I've been trying to download the K10D manual again to do a bit more reading, but "page cannot be found" has come up numerous times over the last hour. Anyone else? Just wondering if I'm alone again. :-[ Jack __ D

Re: PESO: Yosemite, halfdome plus reflection

Hi Jack, On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 11:58:00 -0700 (PDT), Jack Davis wrote: >Post card shot! Well seen and composed. Thanks! >I do have a question about focus/aperture. It may be the small file, >the focus in combination with the chosen aperture, my eyes and/or >monitor, but the dome ridge looks sharpe

Re: Quick question

- Original Message - From: "Bob Sullivan" Subject: Re: Quick question > Boris, > These states were added during my lifetime to the USA. > They were territories and lobbied to become states with full voting > rights. > Hawaii is a long way from the mainland USA and occupied by Japanese

Re: Pentax D FA* 400/4 ED IF

- Original Message - From: "Tim Øsleby" Subject: RE: Pentax D FA* 400/4 ED IF Now I understand why they call you Steady. Handholding a 4009mm is quite an achievement. I bet it's a mirror lens. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/li

Re: Quick question

- Original Message - From: "Boris Liberman" Subject: Quick question > Hi! > > People often say "lower 48" or "low 48" in regard to some of the > United > States. What are the states that do not belong to low 48? BC, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, Nove Scotia, PEI, Ne

Re: PESO: Yosemite, halfdome plus reflection

Nicely done. It makes me want to be there in person. Jan van Wijk wrote: >Came across this one while selecting some stuff for large format >prints today, it is a scan from a 67 slide taken at Yosemite. > > http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=182 > >A split ND filter was used to redu

RE: K10D Manual download

It's been removed from the site as it was a preliminary draft and shouldn't have been put up. You can get it from here: http://www.priyantha.nl/tweakers/index.php?dir=pentax/K10D/samples/ Richard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Davis

Re: Quick question

What about New Brunswick? Tom C. Original Message Follows From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Subject: Re: Quick question Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 13:09:54 -0600 - Original Message - From: "Boris Liber

Re: Quick question

I think we want to negotiate. Will you take California too? William Robb wrote: >- Original Message - >From: "Bob Sullivan" >Subject: Re: Quick question > > > > >>Boris, >>These states were added during my lifetime to the USA. >>They were territories and lobbied to become states with

Re: New Monitor Time.

- Original Message - From: "Mat Maessen" Subject: Re: New Monitor Time. > If your video card doesn't have a DVI output, be sure to add one that > does to the shopping list. How doea one know? William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/list

Re: New Monitor Time.

On 10/6/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If your video card doesn't have a DVI output, be sure to add one that > > does to the shopping list. > How doea one know? Look at the video card, and reference this picture - http://www.karbosguide.com/images/_780.jpg Don't worry about the T

Re: K10 samples

On Oct 6, 2006, at 7:28 PM, John Celio wrote: >> The Olympus C8080WZ also had this capability. I don't know of any >> others that do at this time. > > I believe most Olympus E-xxx dSLRs have that option, though I could be > wrong. I think Olympus was the first company to feature RAW-->jpg > in-

Re: New Monitor Time.

- Original Message - From: "Mat Maessen" Subject: Re: New Monitor Time. > On 10/6/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > If your video card doesn't have a DVI output, be sure to add one >> > that >> > does to the shopping list. >> How doea one know? > > Look at the video card

RE: K10D Manual download

Thanks Tom, William and Richard. It's now securely "saved". Jack --- Richard Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's been removed from the site as it was a preliminary draft and > shouldn't > have been put up. > > You can get it from here: > http://www.priyantha.nl/tweakers/index.php?dir=pentax/K

ACR (beta 3.6) with K100D support

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0610/06100601acr36beta.asp Have fun ;) -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille -- *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Quick question

- Original Message - From: "P. J. Alling" Subject: Re: Quick question >I think we want to negotiate. Will you take California too? > No, but we will consider Oregon and Idaho. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.

Re: Quick question

- Original Message - From: "Tom C" Subject: Re: Quick question > What about New Brunswick? What about it? William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: New Monitor Time.

On Oct 6, 2006, at 8:37 PM, William Robb wrote: >> If your video card doesn't have a DVI output, be sure to add one that >> does to the shopping list. > > How doea one know? You can tell from the connectors available on the graphics card if nothing else. This page is useful regards DVI: htt

RE: Quick question

How about you keep Quebec and we'll trade you Mississippi for New Mexico. Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom C Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 3:38 PM To: pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: Quick question What about New Brunswick? Tom C.

Re: K10 samples

This is a wonderful feature. It solves a problem a friend and I were thinking about not very long ago. If nothing else, I'm loving some of the features the camera offers. Next is to get my sweaty paws on one ... Thanks to all who jumped in with an answer or a comment. Shel > [Original Mess

Re: ACR (beta 3.6) with K100D support

Hmm, well, ACR v3.5 already processes K100D PEF files with no problem at all. DNG Converter does the same to transform them to DNG format. I suspect that Adobe simply neglected to list them, or they didn't test them adequately (to their standards) for the v3.5 release. Now let's see how long

About Sigma 21-35 f/3.5-4.2

Anybody with an idea on this lens ? It could be a cheap way of getting a 21mm on 35mm. -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille -- *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: K10 samples

On 10/06/06 12:28 PM, "John Francis", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The K10D has the capability to produce a JPEG file (in camera) from > a shot originally exposed as a RAW image - kind of like a RAW+JPEG > exposure, but with the JPEG being created at a later time. > > In the (mostly Japanese) tex

Re: PESO: Yosemite, halfdome plus reflection

I agree with you about Zion and Yellowstone, but would have to put Grand Teton right next to Yosemite. Jack --- Jan van Wijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jack, > > On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 11:58:00 -0700 (PDT), Jack Davis wrote: > > >Post card shot! Well seen and composed. > > Thanks! > > >I do

Re: Quick question

You didn't include it in the list of other states... Tom C. Original Message Follows From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Subject: Re: Quick question Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:07:10 -0600 - Original Message -

Re: Pentax D FA* 400/4 ED IF

On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:12:57PM -0600, William Robb wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Tim ?sleby" > Subject: RE: Pentax D FA* 400/4 ED IF > > > Now I understand why they call you Steady. Handholding a 4009mm is quite > an > achievement. > > I bet it's a mirror lens. Would t

Re: Quick question

- Original Message - From: "Tom C" Subject: Re: Quick question > You didn't include it in the list of other states... They are in a state of confusion. We don't pay them much heed. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pd

Re: A nice K10D feature

Well you can set your exp comp +/- up or down depending on the direction you want to bracket, take the three, now you have 0, one over, two over, or vice versa. Maybe thats more than what you want, but at least its in the direction you want. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 06/10/06, Paul Stenqu

Re: OT: CPU question

For the update file: I bought another 512 stick of PC3200 ram today. Is my message any faster? CW - Original Message - From: "cbwaters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:29 AM Subject: Re: OT: CPU question > Thanks Mat. > This ASUS

Re: Re: K10 samples

On 10/6/06, K.Takeshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I liked about those samples which I suppose were the same as the UK > ones, I noticed that UK samples were in jpeg. Ken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Stuck Filter

On 07/10/06, Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The "strap wrench" I mentioned is basically a big rubber band with a > handle, and that's what I was able to get enough purchase with to > actually make something rotate. The problem, as Mike notes, is that the > something that rotated wasn

FS: Battery pack FG

I STILL have the battery pack FG. For all MZ/ZX cameras. It's new, in the box. Buy it now, you know you want one. $20 + shipping. Thanks, Cory -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: A nice K10D feature

On 07/10/06, Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well you can set your exp comp +/- up or down depending on the > direction you want to bracket, take the three, now you have 0, one over, > two over, or vice versa. Maybe thats more than what you want, but at > least its in the direction you want. I

Re: K10 samples

On 07/10/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried it once or twice but never really used it at all. The C8080WZ > was mostly too slow at capture time to work with RAW effectlively. > Frankly, it was an excellent performer but a very irritating camera > to use. > > The feature migh

RE: K10D and AF speed

Good question John. Honestly I don't know what I meant using this term ;-) Higher specked, pro bodies, full frame and such. Thinking about it I'd say that D200 is not state of the art, either is 5D (it is a good camera, but it is not a fine tuned refined camera). So I believe I was referring to h

Re: OT: CPU question

cbwaters wrote: >For the update file: >I bought another 512 stick of PC3200 ram today. >Is my message any faster? Absolutely. I was able to read it in less than a tenth of a second! Ain't technology wonderful? -- Mark Roberts Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com 412-687-2835 -- P

Re: PESO: Yosemite, halfdome plus reflection

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack Davis wrote: >I agree with you about Zion and Yellowstone, but would have to put >Grand Teton right next to Yosemite. Right, I usually include that in Yellostone trips :-) Regards, JvW

Re: About Sigma 21-35 f/3.5-4.2

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 22:26:01 +0200, Thibouille wrote: >Anybody with an idea on this lens ? >It could be a cheap way of getting a 21mm on 35mm. I have one that I used way back, on an MX and later SFXn. It was a good WA for film, a sliding-zoom and manual focus. (but there could be other/newer vari

Re: Stuck Filter

- Original Message - From: "Digital Image Studio" Subject: Re: Stuck Filter > On 07/10/06, Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The "strap wrench" I mentioned is basically a big rubber band with a >> handle, and that's what I was able to get enough purchase with to >> actually

Re: Quick question

No, no, no! We never agreed to take the Frenchies. You gotta keep them, or spin them off. We've already got two official languages - English and Spanish. There is no room for a third official language. Maybe we could help you out with Quebec, but not until after the Iraq war. Then we could send B

K10D Remote shutter release

May be this was discussed recently, but I was skimming thru the k10D manual and noticed that the Self-Timer lamp/Remote control receiver are located on both front and rear of the camera. I assume this will enable the normal remote trip behind the tripod, like in case of people photo or macros. I al

  1   2   >