I really like this one too.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/22/07, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 22, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
One from Boulogne:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/7757564
Love it. Print it big and put it on the wall.
- Dave
Good God man, how did you last that long.
vbg
Dave
On 1/22/07, SJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry for replying late to this, i have been travelling and staying
away from the Net for the last ten days.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
LOL.
Those are great.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/22/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking for stuff on the 77mm limited when I came across this
gallery, it's a hoot.
http://www.pbase.com/mikerigel/debbie
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 1/22/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good God man, how did you last that long.
vbg
On 1/22/07, SJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry for replying late to this, i have been travelling and staying
away from the Net for the last ten days.
dave,
:) it's my once-a-year test of will
ROTFL
What's the white stuff? Dust?
:-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/22/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean like standing under the snow machine at a ski resort and
talking about the blizzard that is hitting the area? Let's see, I think
I still have my photo of the aftermath somewhere
I notice the file is tagged for ProPhotoRGB colour space. It looks
much better viewed in PS IMO.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/22/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 21, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with
Hi Paul,
Check your printer driver. If you're on Windows, it might be that
you're using some Windows auto-installed driver for your printer
which does not work (in this case you are likely to have several
drivers installed for the printer). Choose the correct Epson driver
or re-install it. I
I didn't do the math on my D. If I would I should also calculate the
costs of my Lens Buying Addiction which exceeds the istD price.
The D was the primary infection resulting in my LBA :)
Toine
On 1/21/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All
Since I am soon to receive my K10D, which
Fra: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/21/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gonz
Subject: Re: Hello! (introduction)
I don't differentiate.
Do you integrate?
I
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/22 Mon AM 04:28:35 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Hello! (introduction)
On 1/21/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gonz
Subject: Re: Hello! (introduction)
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/22 Mon AM 09:55:27 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Hello! (introduction)
Fra: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/21/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no idea how I can check the exact amount of shutter actuation
which occured from my D. Is there an EXIF tag somewhere ?
2007/1/22, Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I didn't do the math on my D. If I would I should also calculate the
costs of my Lens Buying Addiction which exceeds the istD
Thank you James.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J
and K Messervy
Sent: 21. januar 2007 20:40
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - Repose
I've got no problem with that mate.
James
Thanks Antti-Pekka,
I'm on a Mac and have reinstalled the latest driver. I'm beginning to
think it's a printer problem. It's only a few weeks old, perhaps the
store will exchange it.
Paul
On Jan 22, 2007, at 3:50 AM, Antti-Pekka Virjonen wrote:
Hi Paul,
Check your printer driver. If you're
On Jan 22, 2007, at 2:38 AM, SJ wrote:
the US
isn't perceived as being very different
Utter nonsense.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Why close a school because of two inches? To make sure the kids don't have
fun in the schoolyard?
I have good news today. Now we have about four inches here, and it is still
snowing. It feels good, mainly because it makes me relax a bit about the
world climate (don't get me wrong I'm still
I'd try the printer on a different machine to see if it's a
printer problem. But you may as well take it back, the store
propably has easier access to a computer they can use to test
it :-).
I seem to remember there have been similar problems with the
Epson printers in the past and the service
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 12:57 AM
Subject: somebody else's gallery
I was looking for stuff on the 77mm limited when I came across this
gallery, it's a hoot.
Thanks Tom.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/22/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice job David. I especially like the 1st and last in column 1.
Tom C.
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/GESO/GESO_013/index.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
For those who have installed the latest K10D firmware...??
has there been any improvement on the banding issues ?
Regards
Patrick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thank you Ann.
It was a new experience form me (photographically speaking).
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/22/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice going, Dave - and how great to be able to see the thing , let alone
document it so well.
Celestial stuff doesn't usually appeal to me (except
Don't you know digital is the way of the future? Time to trade up Mike:
http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/item.cfm?ID=915
Cheers,
Dave ;-)
On 1/22/07, Beaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OOPS- try
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sets/72157594492416654/
Cheers
Mike
--
PDML
I don't care what sort of scanner it is, you are now making a comparison of
a first generation image to a third generation image.
The sad fact of life is that if you want to pull the best you can from film,
you need to print it optically.
That is so true. I recently had some prints done from
Hi Paul an Mark
do they have a website?
I would like to see some Krappy photos :-)
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 1:00 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: A couple of woo-hoos
I can't answer your question Patrick as I haven't installed it, but
speaking of banding.
Is it possible that banding could be an issue when the battery is
nearly depleted?
I've only had one series of shots that displayed banding and none since then.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/22/07, Patrick Genovese
Don't know about Krappy, but I have a wide selection of really crap photos.
Cheers,
Dave ;-)
On 1/22/07, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Paul an Mark
do they have a website?
I would like to see some Krappy photos :-)
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mike wilson wrote:
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/22 Mon AM 09:55:27 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Hello! (introduction)
Fra: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/21/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As real scientists MIT should be ashamed.
SJ wrote:
On 1/22/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
then why did you bother?
Because I'm tired of the crap.
you take the words out of my keyboard
I did a bit of real research, Human Rights Watch for the estimate
Mark. You're snow flake
I didn't see this before, I didn't know Paul thought Mark was snow flake...
I would think them 's fightin' words.
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Paul an Mark
do they have a website?
I would like to see some Krappy photos :-)
Markus
-Original Message-
From:
From: Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/22 Mon AM 10:47:27 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A little *ist D statistics
I have no idea how I can check the exact amount of shutter actuation
which occured from my D. Is there an EXIF tag somewhere ?
David, that's valid assumption methinks.
You see, when my *istD feels the batter is getting depleted, the
noise levels (notably blue channel noise levels) go visibly up.
On 1/22/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't answer your question Patrick as I haven't installed it, but
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling Subject: somebody else's gallery
I was looking for stuff on the 77mm limited when I came across this
gallery, it's a hoot.
http://www.pbase.com/mikerigel/debbie
From the same guy
http://www.pbase.com/mikerigel/image/71302882
He has
And here I thought you were talking about the film camera. Besides,
that is the cats camera.
I'll post his next roll.
Cheers
Beaker
On Jan 22, 2007, at 7:31 AM, David Savage wrote:
Don't you know digital is the way of the future? Time to trade up
Mike:
Christian wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/22 Mon AM 09:55:27 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Hello! (introduction)
Fra: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
DagT wrote:
Fra: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mike wilson wrote:
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fra: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/21/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Gonz
I don't differentiate.
Do you integrate?
Fra: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dato: 2007/01/22 Mon PM 02:29:09 CET
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Hello! (introduction)
mike wilson wrote:
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/22 Mon AM 09:55:27 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Quote The first paragraph of the article.
We used the plush cat and a robotic cat and found that a robotic cat
was more self-engaging and triggered positive emotions and interest
more than the plush cat,
If a poor imitation is better than a worse imitation just think how
beneficial the real
Fra: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dato: 2007/01/22 Mon PM 02:29:09 CET
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Hello! (introduction)
mike wilson wrote:
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/22 Mon AM 09:55:27 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject:
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/22 Mon PM 01:29:09 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Hello! (introduction)
mike wilson wrote:
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/22 Mon AM 09:55:27 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
On 23/01/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/mikerigel/image/71302882
He has some good work posted.
I just stumbled upon a gallery of some particularly good work too:
http://www.motljus.com/motljus5_0.php?language=english
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
David Savage wrote:
I notice the file is tagged for ProPhotoRGB colour space. It looks
much better viewed in PS IMO.
Aaaargh! No wonder people aren't seeing what I'm seeing!
Thanks for tipping me off, Dave. One of the revisions I've been doing
to my web site is making sure all the images in the
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts Subject: Re: Another PESO from Florida
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
Try:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/oldtree.jpg
It's still a sucky picture.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
This seems to be more of a scanner test.(?)
My experience has been the complete opposite. Obviously, personal
impressions, also, play a roll.
Jack
--- Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't care what sort of scanner it is, you are now making a
comparison of
a first generation
Fra: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dato: 2007/01/22 Mon PM 02:57:46 CET
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Re: Hello! (introduction)
DagT wrote:
Fra: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mike wilson wrote:
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fra: mike wilson [EMAIL
Hi, guys (and gals)!
We hear a lot about 31mm and 77mm LTD lenses. It's been a while since
anyone has mentioned much about the 43. Who's using one? What do you
think of this lens compared to to other 'normal' lenses from Pentax?
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Shoot more film!
It is true,
all labs now print on some Noritsu machine.
And they do 3072x2048 scanning during process.
This weekend i sent 6x4.5 scanned Provia 100F to lab, and resized it to
that size to get A4 (20x30cm) image. Print was good, much better than
most of other pics, and i managed to get 1st
On Jan 22, 2007, at 5:29 AM, Christian wrote:
I don't differentiate.
Do you integrate?
I assimilate.
You, too? I thought it was just Cotty.
I thought he permutated.
No, he is a derivative
Just as long as he is not multiplying.
This thread does not add up
It's combinatoric,
With the rebate program going on, I became very interested in the
43mm since the price would be in a reasonable range for a Limited. In
the end, I opted for the FA28/2.8 AL instead ... 40-43mm is just a
little too long for a normal, and a little too short for a portrait
tele. The 28mm fit
On Jan 22, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
One from Boulogne:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/7757564
Very nice, Ralf! I like the open sparseness in this composition.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I am, I like it. Then again I always liked longish normal lenses and
the 43ltd on the APS-C format is a bit longer than a 58mm on 35mm
format. When I shot a lot more film I used a 55mm f1.8 quite a bit on
my MX and LX bodies, and wished it were a tad longer.
Scott Loveless wrote:
Hi, guys
Ah yes, the semi-legendary Fekkinar 85/1.4 ...
Cotty wrote:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/mods/a85ineos.html
It has been assimilated and yearns not for the life it had before.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Scott Loveless wrote:
We hear a lot about 31mm and 77mm LTD lenses. It's been a while since
anyone has mentioned much about the 43.
My recollection of comments I have read here is that it is a very good
lens, just not on par with the other two. Not on price either, I
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Digital Image Studio wrote:
I just stumbled upon a gallery of some particularly good work too:
http://www.motljus.com/motljus5_0.php?language=english
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 1/21/2007 8:56:27 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, here is a K10D shot of a group of 12. K10D, DA 16-45/4, ISO 200,
1/125 sec @ f/13, studio strobes.
Reference photo:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/shaeffer_009.htm
100% view of a single person:
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 22, 2007, at 5:29 AM, Christian wrote:
I don't differentiate.
Do you integrate?
I assimilate.
You, too? I thought it was just Cotty.
I thought he permutated.
No, he is a
In a message dated 1/21/2007 8:10:35 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Congratulations, Mark! That's great.
I had good news yesterday too ...
I had work hanging at the Pacific Art League's Portfolio Show in
December which I picked up just before New Years, thinking
Hi Bruce
the resolution of the single person looks good enough for me. It seems that
perfect exposure and lightning is an important factor.
What I would like to know: While the skin tone on the single shot looks
natural for me, the skin of the men
are quite brown/reddish. Would you say that your
Hi Gasha
didn't they crop parts of your photos, the A4 prints described as 20x30
are more like 20x27cm here?
Or can you choose if you want the photos scaled down with a border?
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Gasha
Sent:
Taken over the weekend. K100D, 18-55 at 43mm, ISO800, f4.5. Auto
contrast, levels, color correction, a little unsharp mask, and save
for web. Any feedback is appreciated, especially technical gripes.
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#5022892507949108034
--
Scott Loveless
This makes no sense at all, digital capture has exposure latitude
just like film does which means BOTH overexposure
or underexposure will noticably degrade the image at some
point with most subjects and the widest exposure latitude digital
is still not as wide as the widest exposure latitude
films
On Jan 22, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Taken over the weekend. K100D, 18-55 at 43mm, ISO800, f4.5. Auto
contrast, levels, color correction, a little unsharp mask, and save
for web. Any feedback is appreciated, especially technical gripes.
No technical gripe. But, IMHO it would look better in portrait orientation.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott Loveless
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 11:33 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - Flower Faery
Taken over
Scott Loveless wrote:
Taken over the weekend. K100D, 18-55 at 43mm, ISO800, f4.5. Auto
contrast, levels, color correction, a little unsharp mask, and save
for web. Any feedback is appreciated, especially technical gripes.
Very cute girl, beautiful lighting, nicely defocused
background. I like it!
Rick
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken over the weekend. K100D, 18-55 at 43mm,
ISO800, f4.5. Auto
contrast, levels, color correction, a little unsharp
mask, and save
for web. Any feedback is
If you are shooting digital, many have said to underexpose to save the
highlights. You are correct to expose accurately for both ends of the
spectrum. The issue with digital, I think, is that the shadow areas
tend to show noise more - so it is really best to expose for the
highlights without
Hi Scott
a lovely photo so far. I would try bluring the background a bit, brighten
t(he white of ) the eyes and take a bit of the blue out of the dress.
Maybe I would have liked it even more from a slightly greater distance.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm...as to color cast, in this shot, the men are somewhat that way
already. I do notice that color correcting for flash shots can be
somewhat like you say. When they are wearing Black and white clothing
like in this shot, you can reasonably correct any color cast. The
other thing that I have
Hello Scott,
No real complaints about the processing. She is a cute girl - makes
for a good subject. Small improvements could possibly be made. For
the shot as presented, I agree with Godfrey that square may be better.
For a future shot, perhaps vertical orientation and just a touch of
fill
I actually look at my value from the *istD in another way:
One of the first dozen shots I took with my *istD (all just test shots of my
kids, then 3yrs and 1yr old) was worth the price of the camera alone - even if
I had dropped it in the sea the next day and lost all of my money. I was
On 1/22/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken over the weekend. K100D, 18-55 at 43mm, ISO800, f4.5. Auto
contrast, levels, color correction, a little unsharp mask, and save
for web. Any feedback is appreciated, especially technical gripes.
Thanks to those that replied. Hopefully the camera will arrive soon,
and I will be able to try it out!
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joseph Tainter
Sent: 19 January 2007 17:57
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: RAW processing for K10D
I don't think that's the case since I can create banding whenever I want it.
Long exposures even at moderate ISO are quite prone to it...
Admittedly it is easy to hide by pulling down the shadows a little
bit. But it can sometimes limit you wrt the sort of manipulation you
can perform on an
On 1/22/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 22, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Taken over the weekend. K100D, 18-55 at 43mm, ISO800, f4.5. Auto
contrast, levels, color correction, a little unsharp mask, and save
for web. Any feedback is appreciated, especially
On 1/22/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Scott,
No real complaints about the processing. She is a cute girl - makes
for a good subject. Small improvements could possibly be made. For
the shot as presented, I agree with Godfrey that square may be better.
For a future shot,
On 1/22/07, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No technical gripe. But, IMHO it would look better in portrait orientation.
Done! Thanks, Bill.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Shoot more film!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 1/22/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very cute girl, beautiful lighting, nicely defocused
background. I like it!
Thanks, Rick!
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Shoot more film!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I took this picture yesterday, with my *ds. I went to take pictures of
Eagles but they must not have wanted their pictures taken. This is
something I have always wanted to do. This is also the first time in 11 yrs
I have been laid off in Jan. So I figured why not. Well I guess I will
On 1/22/07, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
Taken over the weekend. K100D, 18-55 at 43mm, ISO800, f4.5. Auto
contrast, levels, color correction, a little unsharp mask, and save
for web. Any feedback is appreciated, especially technical gripes.
Scott, I am surprised you are not getting more comments on its optical
quality.
Firstly, I don't have it. By reputation, it is weak wide open, but
lovely stopped down. People who have it started writing about the
three-dimensional effect it gives images. This started the whole
discussion
On Jan 22, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
If you are shooting digital, many have said to underexpose to save the
highlights. You are correct to expose accurately for both ends of the
spectrum. The issue with digital, I think, is that the shadow areas
tend to show noise more - so it is
Nice pic. I prefer the portrait crop, but it feels a bit too tight. I'd like to
see it close to a 4:3 frame.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/22/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 22, 2007, at 8:33 AM,
On Jan 21, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
and another one from Liège:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/extra/buddies/display/7752110
Just saw this one ... Unfortunately, the motion blur of the canal
boat proves too distracting for my taste in this case.
G
--
PDML
Thanks for the feedback, folks. I kinda thought it was probably a bit
more work than necessary, but figured a handful of you would be able
to offer a reasonable second opinion. Boy, was I wrong! (Kidding.
Don't kick me.) I wasn't super impressed with the final rendering
offered in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see what you're saying.
Gonz wrote:
Thanks for looking Boris. Yes, it seems many, if not all, HDR shots
have this glow around areas of high contrast. It must be related to
the merge somehow.
Yes, it is kind of weird, but it can have some interesting
Sandra -
I love this picture - the buildings look like little castles, and the
composition is also great. I hope the eagles comply with your wish to
photograph them next time you try to do so.
rg2
- Original Message -
From: Sandra Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent:
This is my son Peter, on his first airplane trip.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo#5022929159140389634
comments welcome
rg2
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I think you are mistaken about the K10D
or any digital camera for that matter
being able to match or surpass the dynamic
range of all color films.
Most of them are rated in the linear
range but the color neg films do have a useful
knee that still captures highlights
without blowing them out and
Thanks, Paul. I loosened it up a bit and gave it the 4:3 treatment
you suggested. Godfrey suggested I also loosen up my square crop. So
I did that, too.
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#5022929835509877618
Mark Roberts wrote
DagT wrote:
Fra: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mike wilson wrote:
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fra: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/21/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Gonz
I don't differentiate.
Once again, Ralf, these are stunning. Especially the first one.
Would you mind giving us a brief explanation as to how you calculate
exposure?
On 1/21/07, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One from Boulogne:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/7757564
and
Hi Pentaxians
still 12 hours to go for the very first snow this year in Zurich and large
parts of Switzerland.
In joyful anticipation of snow :-) I prepared myself with some close-ups of
frozen plants last week.
I really look forward to take some panoramic shots of Zurich with snow in
the next
On Jan 22, 2007, at 10:13 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Speaking of linear RAW conversions, who's using what? Or rather,
what's available? I currently have access to the software that came
with the K100D and CS2.
My production system is Photoshop CS2 + Bridge + Camera Raw (current
version of
On 1/22/07, Sandra Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took this picture yesterday, with my *ds. I went to take pictures of
Eagles but they must not have wanted their pictures taken. This is
something I have always wanted to do. This is also the first time in 11 yrs
I have been laid off
Lovely subject! I agree that it's slightly dark.
Nice lighting for a 24 year old on a date, but such beautiful clear
skin and features deserve a bit more light. IMHO
Be sure and file this one in a safe place. =)
Jack
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/22/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Jan 22, 2007, at 10:54 AM, rg2 wrote:
This is my son Peter, on his first airplane trip.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo#5022929159140389634
Any technical comments are completely overwhelmed by the wonderful
expression you captured. :-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Wonder-ful. Soft pensive catch. I gather the vertical background edges
are a part of the window frame, but in any case, I might try softening
them some.
Thanks for the look.
Jack
--- rg2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my son Peter, on his first airplane trip.
maybe twice but some of my messages seem to disappear ... Markus
-Original Message-
From: Markus Maurer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 6:19 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: PESO - Flower Faery
Hi Scott
a lovely photo so far. I would try
One of my goals for 2007 is to have some of my photos exhibited at a
local coffee shop. I'm choosing images that reflect my life for the
past 2 years, living as a teacher in northern Alberta. This gallery
is not final - you will notice that I have a duplicate (actually a
PESO that I posted not
As far as I can tell, yes.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: K10D pre-release firmware 1.10 now wireless flash
For those who have installed the latest K10D
On 1/22/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 22, 2007, at 10:54 AM, rg2 wrote:
This is my son Peter, on his first airplane trip.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo#5022929159140389634
Any technical comments are completely overwhelmed by the wonderful
1 - 100 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
